Category Archives: Innovation

Strategy for a Post-Digital World

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

For decades, the dominant view of strategy was based on Michael Porter’s ideas about competitive advantage. In essence, he argued that the key to long-term success was to dominate the value chain by maximizing bargaining power among suppliers, customers, new market entrants and substitute goods.

Yet digital technology blew apart old assumptions. As technology cycles began to outpace planning cycles, traditional firms were often outfoxed by smaller competitors that were faster and more agile. Risk averse corporate cultures needed to learn how to “fail fast” or simply couldn’t compete.

Today, as the digital revolution is coming to an end, we will need to rethink strategy once again. Increasingly, we can no longer just move fast and break things, but will have to learn how to prepare, rather than just adapt, build deep collaborations and drive skills-based transformations. Make no mistake, those who fail to make the shift will struggle to survive.

Learning to Prepare Rather Than Racing to Adapt

The digital age was driven, in large part, by Moore’s law. Every 18 months or so, a new generation of chips would come out of fabs that was twice as powerful as what came before. Firms would race to leverage these new capabilities and transform them into actual products and services.

That’s what made agility and adaptation key competitive attributes over the past few decades. When the world changes every 18 months, you need to move quickly to leverage new possibilities. Today, however, Moore’s Law is ending and we’ll have to shift to new architectures, such as quantum, neuromorphic and, possibly, biological computers.

Yet the shift to this new era of heterogeneous computing will not be seamless. Instead of one fairly simple technology based on transistors, we will have multiple architectures that involve very different logical principles. These will need new programming languages and will be applied to solve very different problems than digital computers have been.

Another shift will be from bits to atoms, as fields such as synthetic biology and materials science advance exponentially. As our technology becomes infinitely more powerful, there are also increasingly serious ethical concerns. We will have to come to some consensus on issues like what accountability a machine should have and to what extent we should alter the nature of life.

If there is one thing that the Covid-19 crisis has shown is that if you don’t prepare, no amount of agility will save you.

Treating Collaboration as a New Competitive Advantage

In 1980, IBM was at an impasse. Having already missed the market for minicomputers, a new market for personal computers was emerging. So, the company’s leadership authorized a team to set up a skunk works in Boca Raton, FL. A year later, the company would bring the PC to market and change computer history.

So, it’s notable that IBM is taking a very different approach to quantum computing. Rather than working in secret, it has set up its Q Network of government agencies, academic labs, customers and start-ups to develop the technology. The reason? Quantum computing is far too complex for any one enterprise to pursue on its own.

“When we were developing the PC, the challenge was to build a different kind of computer based on the same technology that had been around for decades,” Bob Sutor, who heads up IBM’s Quantum effort, told me. “In the case of quantum computing, the technology is completely different and most of it was, until fairly recently, theoretical,” he continued. “Only a small number of people understand how to build it. That requires a more collaborative innovation model to drive it forward.”

It’s not just IBM either. We’re seeing similar platforms for collaboration at places like the Manufacturing Institutes, JCESR and the Critical Materials Institute. Large corporations, rather trying to crush startups, are creating venture funds to invest in them. The truth is that the problems we need to solve in the post-digital age are far too complex to go it alone. That’s why today, it’s not enough to have a market strategy, you need to have an ecosystem strategy.

Again, the Covid-19 crisis is instructive, with unprecedented collaborative efforts driving breakthroughs.

Drive Skills-Based Transformations

In the digital era, incumbent organizations needed to learn new skills. Organizations that mastered these skills, such as lean manufacturing, design thinking, user centered design and agile development, enjoyed a significant competitive advantage. Unfortunately, many firms still struggle to deploy critical skills at scale.

As digital technology enters an accelerated implementational phase, the need to deploy these skills at scale will only increase. You can’t expect to leverage technology without empowering your people to use it effectively. That’s why skills-based transformations have become every bit as important as strategic or technology-driven transformations.

As we enter the new post-digital era the need for skills-based transformations will only increase. Digital skills, such as basic coding and design, are relatively simple. A reasonably bright high school student can become proficient in a few months. As noted above, however, the skills needed for this new era will be far more varied and complex.

To be clear, I am not suggesting that everybody will need to have deep knowledge about things like quantum mechanics, neurology or genomics a decade from now any more than everybody needs to write code today. However, we will increasingly have to collaborate with experts in those fields and have some sort of basic understanding.

Making the Shift from Disrupting Markets to Pursuing Grand Challenges

The digital economy was largely built on disruption. As computer chips became exponentially faster and cheaper, innovative firms could develop products and services that could displace incumbent industries. Consider that a basic smartphone today can replace a bundle of technologies, such as video recorders, GPS navigators and digital music players, that would have cost hundreds of thousands of dollars when they were first introduced.

This displacement process has been highly disruptive, but there are serious questions about whether it’s been productive. In fact, for all the hype around digital technology “changing the world,“ productivity has been mostly depressed since the 1970s. In some ways, such as mental health and income inequality, we are considerably worse off than 40 or 50 years ago.

Yet the post-digital era offers us a much greater opportunity to pursue grand challenges. Over the next few decades, we’ll be able to deploy far more powerful technologies to solve problems like cancer, aging and climate change. It is, in the final analysis, these physical world applications that can not only change our lives for the better, but open up massive new markets.

The truth is that the future tends to surprise us and nobody can say for sure what the next few decades will look like. Strategy, therefore, can’t depend on prediction. However, what we can do is prepare for this new era by widening and deepening connections throughout relevant ecosystems, acquiring new skills and focusing on solving meaningful problems.

In the face of uncertainty, the best way to survive is to make yourself useful.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

A Human-Centered Approach to Mastering Disruption

Leave a reply

A Human-Centered Approach to Mastering Disruption

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Disruption. The word itself can evoke a sense of panic in the boardrooms of established organizations. It represents the unknown, the sudden shift that threatens to destabilize markets, render existing strategies obsolete, and even collapse empires. Yet, in our volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world, disruption is not just a possibility; it’s a relentless certainty. The true differentiator for success in this era isn’t about avoiding disruption, but about mastering its management. And at the heart of this mastery lies a profound commitment to human-centered change and innovation. It’s about recognizing that people – your employees, your customers, your partners – are not merely components of the machine, but the very engines of resilience and reinvention.

Effective disruption management transcends mere contingency planning. It demands an organizational culture that is inherently adaptable, relentlessly curious, and deeply empathetic. It requires the courage to challenge assumptions, the agility to pivot rapidly, and the wisdom to learn from every experience – both good and bad. Let’s explore how leading organizations have exemplified these principles through two powerful case studies, revealing the human thread that weaves through their triumph over turbulence.

Case Study 1: The Global Logistics Industry & The COVID-19 Shock

From Supply Chain Gridlock to Agile Lifeline

The dawn of 2020 brought with it a disruption of staggering scale: the COVID-19 pandemic. For the global logistics and supply chain industry, it was an existential shockwave. Traditional systems, built on predictable flows and just-in-time efficiencies, buckled under unprecedented demand surges, crippled by sudden labor shortages, and fractured by international border closures. The world watched as shelves emptied and critical medical supplies became scarce.

However, amidst this chaos, giants like Amazon, FedEx, and a constellation of regional innovators didn’t just survive; they redefined their roles. Their success wasn’t born from static playbooks, but from a dynamic, human-centered response. They rapidly iterated and deployed contactless delivery models, adapting safety protocols not just for efficiency but for the psychological safety of both their workforce and customers. They harnessed the power of real-time data analytics, not just for route optimization, but to predict demand fluctuations and proactively reroute essential goods to areas of greatest need.

Perhaps most profoundly, their leadership empowered frontline employees. Truck drivers, warehouse workers, and delivery personnel became critical innovators, devising on-the-ground solutions for complex, evolving challenges. Leaders listened, decentralized decision-making, and invested in immediate support—from personal protective equipment to rapid retraining. This cultivated an extraordinary level of trust and shared purpose, transforming a fragmented network into a resilient, adaptive lifeline for global communities.

Key Lessons from the Logistics Response:

Distributed Intelligence & Empowerment: Equip and trust your frontline teams; they hold the most immediate insights and often the most pragmatic solutions.
Rapid Experimentation (Build-Measure-Learn): Don’t strive for perfection upfront. Test, learn from feedback, and quickly iterate new solutions, even under immense pressure.
Empathy-Driven Operations: Prioritize the physical and psychological well-being of your employees and customers; their safety and trust are foundational to resilience.
Data as a Human Enabler: Utilize data not just for efficiency, but to inform human decisions and adapt quickly to evolving needs and risks.

Case Study 2: Netflix vs. Blockbuster – The Empathy Divide

A Masterclass in Customer-Centric Disruption

The story of Netflix and Blockbuster is a cautionary tale and a beacon, respectively, in the annals of disruption. Blockbuster, the once-dominant king of video rentals, famously dismissed an opportunity to acquire a nascent Netflix in 2000 for $50 million. Their rationale? Netflix’s DVD-by-mail model seemed niche, and their own late fees were too lucrative to abandon. This was a classic product-centric, rather than human-centered, blind spot.

Netflix, conversely, was built on a foundation of deep customer empathy. They didn’t just offer DVDs; they offered a solution to the frustrations of physical stores, limited choices, and the egregious late fees that plagued Blockbuster’s customers. They listened to the human desire for convenience, variety, and a sense of fairness. As broadband internet became ubiquitous, Netflix didn’t hesitate to disrupt its *own* successful DVD-by-mail model. They recognized the evolving human need for instant gratification and personalization, investing heavily in streaming technology and, crucially, in data-driven content recommendations and original programming.

Blockbuster, meanwhile, clung to its brick-and-mortar legacy, unable or unwilling to shed the very aspects of its business that were becoming pain points for consumers. Their leadership failed to understand the human shift towards digital access and personalized entertainment experiences. Netflix, by consistently putting the customer’s evolving needs at the very core of its strategy – a true demonstration of Human-Centered Change™ in action – didn’t just manage disruption; it orchestrated it, evolving from a DVD service to a global entertainment powerhouse.

Key Lessons from Netflix’s Triumph:

Obsessive Customer-Centricity: Deeply understand and anticipate evolving human needs and frustrations; this is your ultimate compass.
Strategic Cannibalization: Be willing to disrupt your own profitable business models if it serves a superior, emerging customer experience.
Long-Term Vision over Short-Term Myopia: Resist the temptation to prioritize immediate gains when fundamental market shifts are underway.
Culture of Continuous Learning & Adaptation: Foster an organizational mindset that embraces new technologies and business models, even if they seem small or unprofitable at first.

The Human Thread: Cultivating Resilience and Reinvention

These case studies underscore a critical truth: successful disruption management is not a technological problem; it’s a human one. It demands a leadership commitment to fostering environments where curiosity thrives, experimentation is encouraged, and empathy guides every decision. To build an organization capable of not just surviving but thriving amidst continuous disruption, consider these human-centered imperatives:

Cultivate Psychological Safety: Create a culture where speaking up, challenging norms, and even failing fast are embraced as vital components of learning and innovation. Fear is the enemy of adaptation.
Empower the Adaptive Mindset: Invest in continuous learning, providing opportunities for employees to develop skills in areas like design thinking, agile methodologies, and data interpretation. Equip your people to be lifelong learners.
Champion Cross-Functional Collaboration: Break down silos. Disruptive challenges rarely fit neatly into departmental boxes; solutions emerge when diverse perspectives converge and collaborate.
Lead with Radical Transparency & Empathy: During times of uncertainty, clear, honest, and empathetic communication from leadership builds trust and reduces anxiety, freeing people to focus their energy on solving problems.
Design for Human Resilience: Build systems, processes, and a culture that is inherently flexible, capable of absorbing shocks, learning from them, and quickly reconfiguring. This means focusing on human capabilities and adaptability, not just rigid procedures.

Disruption is not a wave to be merely endured; it is a current that can be navigated, harnessed, and even ridden to new horizons. By placing the human element – our innate capacity for innovation, collaboration, and resilience – at the heart of your strategy, you can transform the daunting challenge of disruption into your greatest opportunity for sustained growth and meaningful impact.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: 1 of 850+ FREE quote slides from http://misterinnovation.com

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Machine Learning for Predictive Analytics

Leave a reply

Mastering Foresight in a Fast-Changing World

Machine Learning for Predictive Analytics

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Greetings, fellow innovators! Art Inteligencia here, and today we’re tackling a concept that’s not just revolutionizing business, but fundamentally reshaping how we approach the future: Machine Learning for Predictive Analytics. For too long, organizations have been navigating with a rearview mirror, focusing on what *has* happened. But in our rapidly evolving landscape, the real game-changer is the ability to anticipate, to see around corners, and to proactively shape what *will* happen. This isn’t science fiction; it’s the power of machine learning bringing foresight to the forefront.

Think about it: Every decision you make, every strategy you craft, is inherently a gamble on the future. Predictive analytics, supercharged by machine learning, transforms this gamble into an educated bet. It allows you to move beyond simply understanding “what happened” to confidently predicting “what *will* happen” and, even more critically, “what *could* happen if we make specific choices.” It’s about empowering smarter, more agile human decision-making, not replacing it.

The Human-Centered Core of Predictive Power

Let’s ground this firmly in a human-centered philosophy. Technology, at its best, amplifies human potential. Predictive analytics isn’t about automating away human intuition; it’s about providing our sharpest minds with unprecedented clarity and actionable insights. Imagine your most critical decision-makers, freed from the exhaustive task of sifting through mountains of historical data, now armed with highly probable future scenarios. This empowers them to focus on the truly human aspects of their roles: creativity, empathy, strategic thinking, and decisive action.

Machine learning excels at uncovering hidden patterns and subtle relationships within colossal datasets – patterns too complex for human eyes or traditional statistical methods to detect. It’s like equipping a detective with the ability to instantly connect a million seemingly unrelated dots to reveal a clear picture of future events. This capability isn’t just about efficiency; it’s about unlocking entirely new avenues for value creation, risk mitigation, and truly personalized experiences.

The Engine of Foresight: How Machine Learning Works Its Magic

At its heart, machine learning for prediction involves training algorithms on vast historical data sets. These algorithms “learn” from the patterns they identify, building a model that can then be applied to new, unseen data to generate predictions. It’s a dynamic, iterative process, far from a static report. Different types of machine learning algorithms are suited for different predictive challenges:

Regression Models: For predicting continuous numerical values. Think sales forecasts for next quarter, projected customer lifetime value, or expected energy consumption.
Classification Models: For predicting categorical outcomes. Examples include identifying customers likely to churn, flagging fraudulent transactions, recommending the next best product, or diagnosing potential equipment failure.
Time Series Models: Specifically designed for forecasting future values based on sequential, time-stamped data. Crucial for demand planning, financial market predictions, and even predicting website traffic.
Clustering & Anomaly Detection: While not strictly “predictive” in the traditional sense, these techniques identify natural groupings or unusual events, which can then inform proactive strategies (e.g., identifying high-value customer segments, detecting unusual network activity before a breach occurs).

The success isn’t just in picking the “right” algorithm, but in the meticulous preparation of data, the intelligent selection of variables (features), and the continuous cycle of model training, validation, and refinement. It’s a powerful blend of data science rigor and deep business understanding.

Case Study 1: Transforming Patient Outcomes with Proactive Healthcare

Predicting Readmissions at HealthHorizon Hospital Network

HealthHorizon, a leading hospital network, grappled with persistently high patient readmission rates for specific chronic conditions. This wasn’t just a financial burden; it represented a failure in continuity of care and negatively impacted patient well-being. They possessed rich, longitudinal patient data: clinical notes, lab results, medication histories, socio-economic factors, and prior readmission events.

The Predictive Solution: HealthHorizon implemented a sophisticated machine learning model (leveraging a combination of ensemble methods like Gradient Boosting and Random Forests) trained on years of de-identified patient data. The model’s objective: predict the probability of a patient being readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Key predictive features included medication adherence patterns, recent emergency room visits, access to follow-up care, and specific comorbidities.

The Impact: Nurses and care managers received real-time “risk scores” for patients upon discharge, allowing them to instantly identify high-risk individuals. This empowered targeted, proactive interventions: intensive patient education, prioritized home health visits, medication reconciliation by pharmacists, and immediate connection to social support services. Within two years, HealthHorizon achieved a remarkable 22% reduction in 30-day readmission rates for their chronic disease cohort, translating to millions in cost savings and, more importantly, vastly improved patient health and satisfaction. This is a prime example of technology enabling more human, empathetic care.

Case Study 2: Revolutionizing Retail with Hyper-Accurate Demand Planning

Predicting Peak Demand at Nova Retail Group

Nova Retail Group, a multinational apparel and electronics retailer, faced perennial challenges with inventory optimization. Inaccurate demand forecasts led to either expensive overstocking (requiring heavy discounting) or frustrating understocking (resulting in lost sales and customer dissatisfaction). Their traditional forecasting methods couldn’t keep pace with rapidly shifting consumer trends and global supply chain complexities.

The Predictive Solution: Nova deployed a multi-modal machine learning system for demand forecasting. This system integrated various models, including advanced Time Series Neural Networks (e.g., LSTMs) and tree-based models, to predict demand at the SKU-store level. Data inputs were comprehensive: historical sales, promotional schedules, competitor activities, social media sentiment, local economic indicators, weather patterns, and even global news events. The models dynamically learned the interplay of these factors.

The Impact: The new system delivered significantly higher forecast accuracy. Nova was able to fine-tune their purchasing, logistics, and in-store merchandising strategies. They saw a dramatic 18% reduction in inventory carrying costs while simultaneously experiencing a 5% increase in sales due to improved product availability. This shift freed up capital, reduced waste, and allowed their human merchandising teams to pivot from reactive problem-solving to proactive trend analysis and innovative product launches. It was about making supply chains smarter and more responsive to human desire.

Embarking on Your Predictive Journey: Practical Steps for Success

Inspired? Good! But remember, the journey to becoming a predictive organization isn’t just about buying software. It’s about a strategic shift. Here are some critical considerations:

Key Takeaways for Implementation:

Start with a Human Problem: Don’t chase the tech. Identify a clear, impactful business or human problem where foresight can deliver significant value.
Embrace Data Maturity: Prediction thrives on clean, accessible, and relevant data. Invest in your data infrastructure, governance, and quality from day one.
Foster Cross-Functional Collaboration: Success requires a powerful alliance between data scientists, business domain experts, IT, and the end-users who will leverage these predictions.
Think Iteration, Not Perfection: Predictive models are living entities. Start small, prove value, then continuously monitor, refine, and retrain your models as new data emerges.
Prioritize Ethical AI: Understand and mitigate potential biases in your data and algorithms. Ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability, especially when predictions impact individuals’ lives or livelihoods.
Measure ROI Beyond Dollars: While financial returns are important, also track improvements in customer satisfaction, employee empowerment, risk reduction, and competitive differentiation.

As a thought leader committed to human-centered change, I urge you to look beyond the hype and truly grasp the transformative potential of machine learning for predictive analytics. It’s not merely a technological advancement; it’s an opportunity to build more resilient, responsive, and ultimately, more human-centric organizations. The future isn’t a fixed destination; with predictive intelligence, you have the power to help shape it for the better.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Power of Stopping

Leave a reply

The Power of Stopping

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

If when you write your monthly report no one responds with a question of clarification or constructive comment, this may be a sign your organization places little value on your report and the work it stands for.

If someone sends a thank you email and do not mention something specific in your report, this masked disinterest is a half-step above non-interest and is likely also a sign your organization places little value on your report and the work it stands for.

If you want to know for sure what people think of your work, stop writing your report. If no one complains, your work is not valuable to the company. If one person complains, it’s likely still not valuable. And if that single complaint comes from your boss, your report/work is likely not broadly valuable, but you’ll have to keep writing the report.

But don’t blame the organization because they don’t value your work. Instead, ask yourself how your work must change so it’s broadly valuable. And if you can’t figure a way to make your work valuable, stop the work so you can start work that is.

If when you receive someone else’s monthly report and you don’t reply with a question of clarification or constructive comment, it’s because you don’t think their work is all that important. And if this is the case, tell them you want to stop receiving their report and ask them to stop sending them to you.

Hopefully, this will start a discussion about why you want to stop hearing about their work which, hopefully, will lead to a discussion about how their work could be modified to make it more interesting and important.

This dialog will go one of two ways – they will get angry and take you off the distribution list or they will think about your feedback and try to make their work more interesting and important.

In the first case, you’ll receive one fewer report and in the other, there’s a chance their work will blossom into something magical. Either way, it’s a win.

While reports aren’t the work, they do stand for the work. And while reports are sometimes considered overhead, they do perform an inform function – to inform the company of the work that’s being worked. If the work is amazing, the reports will be amazing and you’ll get feedback that’s amazing. And if the work is spectacular, the reports will be spectacular and you’ll get feedback that matches.

But this post isn’t about work or reports, it’s about the power of stopping. When something stops, the stopping is undeniable and it forces a discussion about why the stopping started. With stopping, there can be no illusion that progress is being made because stopping is binary – it’s either stopped or it isn’t. And when everyone knows progress is stopped, everyone also knows the situation is about to get some much-needed attention from above, wanted or not.

Stopping makes a statement. Stopping gets attention. Stopping is serious business.

And here’s a little-known fact: Starting starts with stopping.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Why Data-Based Decisions Will Lead You Straight to Hell

Leave a reply

Why Data-Based Decisions Will Lead You Straight to Hell

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

Many years ago, Clay Christensen visited his firm where I was a partner and told us a story*.

“I imagine the day I die and present myself at the entrance to Heaven,” he said. “The Lord will show me around, and the beauty and majesty will overcome me. Eventually, I will notice that there are no numbers or data in Heaven, and I will ask the Lord why that is.”

“Data lies,” the Lord will respond. “Nothing that lies can be in Heaven. So, if people want data, I tell them to go to Hell.”

We all chuckled at the punchline and at the strength of the language Clay used (if you ever met him, you know that he was an incredibly gentle and soft-spoken man, so using the phrase “go to Hell” was the equivalent of your parents unleashing a five-minute long expletive-laden rant).

“If you want data, go to Hell.”

Clay’s statement seems absolutely blasphemous, especially in a society that views quantitative data as the ultimate source of truth:

“In God we trust. All others bring data.” W. Edward Deming, founding Father of Total Quality Management (TQM)
“Above all else, show the data.” – Edward R. Tufte, a pioneer in the field of data visualization
“What gets measured gets managed” – Peter Drucker, father of modern management studies

But it’s not entirely wrong.

Quantitative Data’s blessing: A sense of safety

As humans, we crave certainty and safety. This was true millennia ago when we needed to know whether the rustling in the leaves was the wind or a hungry predator preparing to leap and tear us limb from lime. And it’s true today when we must make billion-dollar decisions about buying companies, launching products, and expanding into new geographies.

We rely on data about company valuation and cash flow, market size and growth, and competitor size and strategy to make big decisions, trusting that it is accurate and will continue to be true for the foreseeable future.

Quantitative Data’s curse: The past does not predict the future

As leaders navigating an increasingly VUCA world, we know we must prepare for multiple scenarios, operate with agility, and be willing to pivot when change happens.

Yet we rely on data that describes the past.

We can extrapolate it, build forecasts, and create models, but the data will never tell us with certainty what will happen in the future. It can’t even tell us the Why (drivers, causal mechanisms) behind the What it describes.

The Answer: And not Or

Quantitative data Is useful. It gives us the sense of safety we need to operate in a world of uncertainty and a starting point from which to imagine the future(s).

But, it is not enough to give the clarity or confidence we need to make decisions leading to future growth and lasting competitive advantage.

To make those decisions, we need quantitative data AND qualitative insights.

We need numbers and humans.

Qualitative Insight’s blessing: A view into the future

Humans are the source of data. Our beliefs, motivations, aspirations, and actions are tracked and measured, and turned into numbers that describe what we believed, wanted, and did in the past.

By understanding human beliefs, motivations, and aspirations (and capturing them as qualitative insights), we gain insight into why we believed, wanted, and did those things and, as a result, how those beliefs, motivations, aspirations, and actions could change and be changed. With these insights, we can develop strategies and plans to change or maintain beliefs and motivations and anticipate and prepare for events that could accelerate or hinder our goals. And yes, these insights can be quantified.

Qualitative Insight’s curse: We must be brave

When discussing the merit of pursuing or applying qualitative research, it’s not uncommon for someone to trot out the saying (erroneously attributed to Henry Ford), “If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said a horse that goes twice as fast and eats half as much.”

Pushing against that assertion requires you to be brave. To let go of your desire for certainty and safety, take a risk, and be intellectually brave.

Being brave is hard. Staying safe is easy. It’s rational. It’s what any reasonable person would do. But safe, rational, and reasonable people rarely change the world.

One more story

In 1980, McKinsey predicted that the worldwide market for cell phones would max out at 900,000 subscribers. They based this prediction on solid data, analyzed by some of the most intelligent people in business. The data and resulting recommendations made sense when presented to AT&T, McKinsey’s client.

Five years later, there were 340,213 subscribers, and McKinsey looked pretty smart. In 1990, there were 5.3 million subscribers, almost 6x McKinsey’s prediction. In 1994, there were 24.1M subscribers in the US alone (27x McKinsey’s global forecast), and AT&T was forced to pay $12.6B to acquire McCaw Cellular.

Should AT&T have told McKinsey to “go to Hell?” No.

Should AT&T have thanked McKinsey for going to (and through) Hell to get the data, then asked whether they swung by earth to talk to humans and understand their Jobs to be Done around communication? Yes.

Because, as Box founder Aaron Levie reminds us,

“Sizing the market for a disruptor based on an incumbent’s market is like sizing a car industry off how many horses there were in 1910.”

* Except for the last line, these probably (definitely) weren’t his exact words, but they are an accurate representation of what I remember him saying

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Benchmarking Innovation Across Industries

Leave a reply

Your Compass for Disruption

Benchmarking Innovation Across Industries

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In our perpetually accelerating world, the concept of innovation has evolved from a differentiator to an absolute imperative. Yet, many organizations find themselves sailing without a compass, unsure if their innovation efforts are truly moving them forward or simply spinning their wheels. How do you measure the efficacy of your innovation engine? How do you ensure your investments yield meaningful returns? And, most critically for the human-centered leader, how do you cultivate an environment where impactful, empathetic innovation consistently blossoms? The answer lies in the strategic, often counter-intuitive, practice of benchmarking innovation across industries.

Benchmarking, when applied to innovation, isn’t about mere imitation. It’s a profound exercise in strategic empathy – understanding the deep-seated mechanisms, cultural enablers, and human-centric design philosophies that drive breakthrough success in seemingly unrelated fields. Imagine innovation as a vast ocean: by observing the tides, currents, and successful voyages in different parts of this ocean, you gain insights far beyond the shores of your own industry. This cross-pollination of knowledge is the wellspring of truly disruptive thinking.

The Irresistible Case for Cross-Industry Innovation Benchmarking

Why cast your gaze beyond your immediate competitors? The reasons are compelling:

Shattering Paradigms: Your industry’s “best practices” often represent the collective wisdom of the past, not the blueprint for the future. Looking externally forces a healthy challenge to entrenched assumptions, revealing fresh perspectives on customer pain points and value creation.
Early Warning System & Opportunity Radar: Innovation frequently originates at the periphery. By observing how diverse industries respond to macro trends – technological shifts, demographic changes, or evolving consumer values – you gain an early understanding of both threats and untapped opportunities for your own organization.
Unearthing Novel Methodologies & Human-Centered Approaches: A financial services firm might discover powerful agile methodologies from a leading software developer, or a public sector agency could adapt customer journey mapping techniques perfected by a world-class hospitality chain. These aren’t just process improvements; they’re often deeply rooted in understanding and serving human needs better.
Fostering a Growth Mindset & Innovation Culture: Actively seeking and integrating external insights cultivates an organizational culture of continuous learning, curiosity, and bold experimentation. It signals to your teams that innovation is a shared journey, not a siloed activity.
Setting Ambitious, Data-Driven Goals: Understanding what “great” looks like elsewhere provides empirical context for setting truly ambitious yet achievable innovation metrics, from ideation velocity to commercialization success rates and the human impact of new offerings.

The Strategic Imperative: How to Benchmark Effectively

Effective cross-industry innovation benchmarking isn’t a passive observation; it’s a deliberate, strategic endeavor. Here’s a structured approach:

Pinpoint Your Innovation Challenge: Be specific. Is it accelerating product development, enhancing customer experience, fostering internal creativity, or improving innovation ROI? Your focus determines who you’ll benchmark.
Identify Unconventional Leaders: Look beyond direct competitors. Who is consistently lauded for innovation, regardless of their sector? Think companies known for breakthrough user experiences, unique business models, or unparalleled operational agility. Don’t shy away from smaller, nimble players who are disrupting.
Deconstruct Their Innovation Ecosystem: This is where the depth comes in. Don’t just look at their products. Investigate:
- Culture: How do they foster psychological safety and risk-taking?
- Processes: What methodologies (e.g., design thinking, lean startup) do they employ?
- Structure: How are their innovation teams organized and empowered?
- Metrics: What do they measure to track innovation success?
- Technology & Tools: What platforms enable their innovation?
- Customer Centricity: How deeply do they understand and integrate user needs?
Translate & Adapt, Don’t Copy: This is critical. The goal is to extract the underlying principles and human-centered philosophies, then thoughtfully translate them to your unique organizational context, capabilities, and customer base. A direct copy rarely works; thoughtful adaptation almost always adds value.
Implement, Measure & Iterate Relentlessly: Apply the insights. Crucially, establish clear metrics (e.g., speed to market, patent applications, employee innovation engagement, customer satisfaction with new features, revenue from new offerings) to track the impact of your adapted approaches. Be prepared to learn, refine, and evolve.

Case Study 1: Healthcare’s Surgical Precision from Formula 1 Pits

The Great Ormond Street Hospital & McLaren Racing

In a powerful example of radical cross-industry learning, the cardiac surgery team at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London faced a persistent challenge: transferring critically ill children from the operating theatre to intensive care. Errors, though rare, could have devastating consequences. They turned not to other hospitals, but to the fast-paced, high-stakes world of Formula 1 motor racing, specifically the pit crew of McLaren.

The hospital observed how McLaren’s pit crews executed complex, time-sensitive tasks with astonishing precision under immense pressure. They benchmarked their meticulous checklists, clear communication protocols, designated roles, and rigorous post-event debriefs. By adapting these human-centered process disciplines – focusing on pre-planning, standardized handovers, and structured team communication – the hospital significantly reduced errors and improved patient safety during this critical transition phase. It wasn’t about the cars; it was about the flawless execution of a complex, human-driven process.

Case Study 2: Financial Services Reimagining Customer Experience from Entertainment

Capital One & Walt Disney Parks and Resorts

For years, financial services were synonymous with rigidity and impersonal transactions. Capital One, seeking to radically transform its customer experience, didn’t just look at other banks. They looked at organizations renowned for creating magical, seamless human experiences. One key inspiration? Walt Disney Parks and Resorts.

Capital One benchmarked Disney’s approach to “imagineering” the customer journey, from the moment of initial interaction to ongoing engagement. They studied how Disney designs for emotion, manages queues (wait times), onboards new visitors (customers), and resolves issues with an emphasis on delight. This led to Capital One’s development of new branch designs (Capital One Cafés) that are less transactional and more experiential, offering inviting spaces, digital tools, and human support for financial well-being. They also redesigned their digital interfaces and customer service protocols, infusing a sense of warmth and proactive problem-solving, much like Disney’s commitment to creating memorable moments. They benchmarked not financial products, but the art and science of creating genuinely positive human interactions.

Your Call to Action: Broaden Your Horizon, Deepen Your Impact

As the lines between industries continue to blur, and as customer expectations for seamless, intuitive, and valuable experiences escalate, the future belongs to organizations willing to learn from anyone, anywhere. Don’t allow the comfortable confines of your industry’s echo chamber to limit your potential. Be curious. Be courageous. Be human-centered in your quest for knowledge.

By intentionally looking beyond your immediate competitive landscape – by recognizing that the best solutions to your challenges might exist in an entirely different domain – you not only accelerate your innovation velocity but also enrich your organizational culture. It’s time to equip your innovation engine with a compass that points beyond the obvious, towards the uncharted territories of cross-industry brilliance. That’s where true disruption, and lasting human value, will be found.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

This 9-Box Grid Can Help Grow Your Best Future Talent

Leave a reply

This 9-Box Grid Can Help Grow Your Best Future Talent

GUEST POST from Soren Kaplan

Hiring good people is tough. Retaining your best talent can be equally challenging. In today’s disruptive world, competitive advantage relies as much on people as it does technology.

So, how do you objectively know which people are your all-stars, especially in a bigger organization? And not just the best talent today, but the best for the future?

I originally wrote this article for my Inc. Magazine column. My team at Praxie.com created an online 9-Box app and I was stunned at how much interest there was from across industries for this solution.

Keeping & Growing Talent is Today’s Name of the Game

Just as it’s easier and cheaper to retain customers than to acquire new ones, the same goes for employees. Knowing who your current and future all-stars are helps you keep them and gives you the opportunity to help them grow into more strategic roles.

The 9-box talent grid categorizes your people into nine categories. The grid contains two axes, performance and potential, each of which includes three levels each: low, moderate, and high. When you match up the categories on the axes, you get nine boxes that become classifications.

Categorizing people helps reveal who’s contributing the most now, and who will likely contribute the most in the future:

Stars (High Potential, High Performance): Consistently high performance with high potential. Will likely become part of the future leadership team.

High Potentials (High Potential, Moderate Performance): Solid performance overall with high potential to grow. Will most likely advance in current or future roles and may become part of the future leadership team.

Enigmas (High Potential, Low Performance): While high potential, challenges exist in performance that may require additional support or training and development.

High Performer (Moderate Potential, High Performance): Consistently high performance with solid potential to advance in current role and future positions with the right opportunity.

Key Player (Moderate Potential, Moderate Performance): Overall good performance and potential with additional support and opportunities to grow.

Inconsistent Player (Moderate Potential, Low Performance): Low performance and moderate potential require additional support and training to validate growth opportunity.

Workhorses (Low Potential, High Performance): Highly effective performance yet may have peaked in terms of potential so coaching or training may help elevate potential.

Backups (Low Potential, Moderate Performance): Decent performance and an asset but may not become a more significant contributor.

Bad Hires (Low Potential, Low Performance): Low performance coupled with low potential means re-evaluating overall role in organization.

The team at Praxie.com has made the 9-Box application available to try to free.

9 Box Example

Shoot for the Stars

The easiest way is to assign people to the categories is based on your experience working with them. Or, if you’re in a larger organization, collect inputs from managers and aggregate the results.

Here’s how it works: The CEO of an organization works with their HR director to collect inputs from managers within the sales department. Twenty-five sales representatives are mapped into the nine boxes. The results are used to provide additional incentives, identify people for leadership development programs, and promote individual reps to managers for new territories.

The 9-box grid provides a snapshot in time. Use the tool to continually assess and reassess your talent. You’ll see some people move up and to the right while others may stay stagnant. Use these trends to help people grow. It won’t improve just your organizational culture. It will also improve your business.

Image credits: Praxie.com

This article was originally published on Inc.com and has been syndicated for this blog.

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovative Solutions for an Aging Population

Leave a reply

Innovative Solutions for an Aging Population

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The world is experiencing a significant demographic shift as the population ages. By 2050, it is estimated that there will be over 2 billion people aged 60 and above. This challenge presents not just a concern, but an opportunity for innovation. Developing effective solutions to improve their quality of life requires a multifaceted approach that combines technology, urban design, and community engagement.

Case Study 1: Technology-Enhanced Senior Care

One of the most promising areas of innovation in addressing the needs of an aging population is the use of technology in senior care. A prime example is the startup GrandPad, which developed a tablet specifically tailored for older adults.

GrandPad simplifies communication with family and caregivers through a user-friendly interface, allowing seniors to easily access video calls, photos, and the internet. With features such as automatic updates and a large touch screen, it has proven to bridge the digital divide for older adults.

An important aspect of GrandPad is its safety features, which include emergency assistance and remote monitoring capabilities that alert caregivers if a senior has not used the device for an extended period. Feedback from users indicates that the device has significantly decreased feelings of isolation, with families reporting higher engagement levels with their aging relatives.

A study conducted by the University of California revealed that regular use of GrandPad led to a 30% reduction in reported feelings of loneliness among seniors, demonstrating technology’s powerful role in enhancing emotional well-being.

Case Study 2: Age-Friendly Urban Design

Another innovative approach can be found in urban planning, showcased by the city of Melbourne in Australia. Recognizing that aging populations are often under-served, Melbourne has taken significant steps to create an age-friendly urban environment.

The city has rolled out initiatives to install more benches and rest areas, making it easier for older adults to navigate the city comfortably. Additionally, the accessibility of public transportation has been enhanced through low-floor trams and better training for staff to assist seniors effectively.

Moreover, Melbourne’s project “Living Streets” encourages community involvement in designing public spaces, ensuring specific needs of older citizens are met. These efforts have shown positive outcomes, with a reported 40% increase in senior participation in community events since the program’s implementation.

These measures not only encourage older adults to remain active and engaged in their communities but also foster a sense of belonging, contributing to improved mental health outcomes.

Conclusion

As the global population continues to age, innovative solutions such as technology-enhanced care and age-friendly urban design will be critical in addressing the needs of older adults. By embracing these ideas and implementing data-driven initiatives, we can create a world where everyone, regardless of age, can thrive. As we move forward, it’s essential for stakeholders at all levels—from policymakers to entrepreneurs—to collaborate and champion innovative solutions that enhance the quality of life for our aging population.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How Consensus Kills Innovation

4 Replies

How Consensus Kills Innovation

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

“I hate consensus,” legendary Silicon Valley coach Bill Campbell used to growl. The problem, as the authors explain in the book, Trillion Dollar Coach, wasn’t that he didn’t want people to get along, but that an easy consensus often leads to groupthink and inferior decisions. It’s often just easier to fall in line than to engage in vigorous debate.

Research bears this out. In one study where college students were asked to solve a murder mystery, homogenous groups that formed an easy consensus felt more successful, but actually performed worse than more diverse teams that argued and voiced different viewpoints. When everybody agrees, nobody questions.

Make no mistake. If an idea is big enough, some people aren’t going to like it. Some will argue against it passionately and others may even try and actively undermine it. Yet rather than working to silence those voices, we need to learn to bring them to the fore. That’s how we can test our assumptions, consider other alternatives and, ultimately, come up with better ideas.

The Dangers of Consensus

Whenever the Harlem Globetrotters play the Washington Generals, there’s no doubt what the outcome will be, because the point isn’t to have a genuine contest. The games are essentially theatre set up to entertain the audience. All too often, we set up meetings in very much the same way — designed to reach a particular conclusion for the sake of expediency.

Unfortunately, leaders have strong incentives to drive quickly toward a consensus. Listening to dissenting views takes time and energy and we want to get things done quickly and move forward. So, it’s tempting to stock the room with people who are already on board and present the idea as a fait accompli.

Even if a leader isn’t consciously designing meetings for consensus, dissenting views can get squelched. In a famous series of conformity studies done in the 1950s, it was shown that we have a strong tendency to agree with the majority opinion even if it is obviously wrong. Subsequent research has generally confirmed the findings.

The truth is that majorities don’t just rule, they also influence. We can’t count on one or two lone voices having the courage to speak up. That’s why it’s not enough to simply listen to dissenting views, we must actively seek them out.

Uncovering Dissent

The biggest mistake a leader can make is to assume that they have somehow built a culture that is so unique, and that people feel so secure that they will voice their true views. We have to design for debate—it won’t just happen on its own—and there are several techniques that can help us do that.

The first is changing meeting structure. If the most senior person in the meeting voices an opinion, others will tend to fall in line. So, starting with the most junior person and then working up will encourage more debate. Another option is to require everyone to voice an opinion, either through a document or a conversation with a senior leader, before the meeting starts.

Another strategy that is often effective is called a pre-mortem analysis. Similar to a post-mortem analysis in which you try to figure out what went wrong, in a pre-mortem you assume a project has failed in the future and try to guess what killed it. It’s a great way to surface stuff you might have missed.

A third option is to set up a red team. This is an independent group whose sole purpose is to poke holes in a plan or a project. For example, while planning the Osama bin Laden Raid, a red team was set up to look at the same evidence and try to come up with different conclusions. They were able to identify a few key weaknesses in the plan that were then corrected.

Overcoming Opposition

While opening up a healthy discussion around dissenting views helps drive innovation forward, ignoring opposition can lead to its demise. Every significant innovation represents change, which creates winners and losers. There will always be some who will be so vehemently opposed that they will try to undermine an innovation moving forward.

Since my book Cascades was published, I’ve had the opportunity to work with a number of organizations working to drive transformation and have been amazed how reticent many are to identify entrenched opposition and build a strategy to overcome it. Often, they aren’t willing to admit that opposition is relevant or even that it exists at all.

Unlike those who merely have dissenting views, but share objectives and values with the transformation team, entrenched opposition wants to stop change in its tracks. For example, as I have previously noted, it was internal opposition, chiefly from franchisees and shareholders, not a lack of strategy or imagination, that killed Blockbuster Video.

That’s why, much like dissenting views, it’s important to bring opposition to the fore. In Blockbuster’s case, there were various actions that management could have taken to mollify the opposition and address some of the concerns. That wouldn’t have guaranteed success, but it would have made it far more likely.

Innovation Must Be Led

Steve Jobs was, by all accounts, a mediocre engineer. It was his passion and vision that made Apple the most valuable company on the planet. In a similar vein, there were plenty of electric car companies before Tesla, but Elon Musk was the first who showed that the technology can succeed in the marketplace.

Can you imagine what would have happened if Jobs had the iPhone designed by a committee? Or if Musk had put Tesla’s business plan to a vote? It’s hard to see either having had much success. What we would have ended up with is a watered-down version of the initial idea.

Yet all too often, managers seek out consensus because it’s easy and comfortable. It’s much harder to build a culture of trust that can handle vigorous debate, where people are willing to voice their opinions and listen to those of others without it getting personal. That, however, is what innovative cultures do.

Big ideas are never easy. Almost by definition, they are unlikely, fraught with risk and often counterintuitive. They need champions to inspire and empower beliefs around them. That’s why leadership drives innovation and consensus often kills it.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Importance of Diversity in Innovation Teams

Leave a reply

The Importance of Diversity in Innovation Teams

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world defined by rapid change and complexity, innovation is the engine of progress. But what powers innovation? The answer lies in diversity—the rich tapestry of perspectives, experiences, and ideas that diverse teams bring to the table. Diversity in innovation teams is not a luxury; it’s a necessity for creating solutions that resonate with a global audience. Diverse teams challenge assumptions, uncover blind spots, and spark breakthroughs that homogenous groups often overlook. In this article, we’ll explore why diversity is critical to innovation, examine two powerful case studies, and offer practical steps for building inclusive teams that drive human-centered change.

Why Diversity Fuels Innovation

Diversity in innovation teams encompasses more than demographics like race, gender, or age. It includes cognitive diversity—different ways of thinking and problem-solving—as well as socioeconomic, geographic, and professional diversity. This multifaceted approach ensures that teams approach challenges from multiple angles, leading to more creative and effective solutions. A 2015 McKinsey study found that companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity were 15% more likely to achieve above-average financial returns, while those with gender diversity were 25% more likely to outperform their peers.

But the benefits go beyond numbers. Diverse teams foster psychological safety, where team members feel empowered to share bold ideas without fear of judgment. This environment is critical for human-centered innovation, which relies on empathy to address the needs of diverse audiences. However, diversity alone isn’t enough—organizations must cultivate inclusion to ensure every voice is heard and valued. Without inclusion, diversity can lead to conflict or disengagement, undermining innovation efforts.

Case Study 1: IBM’s Design Thinking Transformation

In the early 2010s, IBM faced a challenge: how to stay competitive in a fast-evolving tech landscape. The company turned to design thinking, a human-centered approach to innovation, and prioritized diversity in its teams. IBM assembled cross-functional groups that included engineers, designers, data scientists, and marketers from diverse cultural, racial, and professional backgrounds. These teams were trained to empathize with users, define problems collaboratively, and prototype solutions iteratively.

The impact was profound. Diverse teams helped shape IBM’s Watson AI platform, ensuring its applications—particularly in healthcare—addressed the needs of varied patient populations. For example, insights from team members with international healthcare experience led to features that supported multilingual patient interactions, improving accessibility. By 2018, IBM reported a 300% increase in ROI for design-driven projects, with diverse teams credited for identifying user needs that might have been missed by less varied groups.

“Our diverse teams brought perspectives that challenged our assumptions and made Watson a truly global solution,” said Phil Gilbert, former President of IBM Design. “Inclusion was the key to unlocking their potential.”

[Image: A diverse IBM team collaborates in a design thinking workshop, using sticky notes and whiteboards to map user journeys. Alt text: A group of professionals from varied backgrounds brainstorming around a whiteboard filled with colorful sticky notes.]

Case Study 2: Procter & Gamble’s Connect + Develop Program

Procter & Gamble (P&G) revolutionized its innovation strategy with its Connect + Develop program, launched in the early 2000s. The initiative sought external partnerships to co-create products, and diversity was at its core. P&G formed teams that blended internal employees with external experts from startups, academia, and global communities, representing diverse industries, cultures, and socioeconomic backgrounds. This approach disrupted P&G’s traditional thinking and led to groundbreaking innovations.

The Swiffer product line is a prime example. A diverse team of chemists, marketers, and external designers from varied cultural contexts collaborated to address unmet consumer needs for convenient cleaning. Insights from team members with experience in emerging markets ensured the Swiffer was affordable and practical for a wide range of households. The result? Swiffer became a $1 billion brand within a few years, contributing to P&G’s reported 50% innovation success rate through Connect + Develop.

“Diversity gave us a window into consumer needs we hadn’t seen before,” said Laura Becker, a former P&G innovation leader. “Our global team members brought ideas that transformed our approach.”

[Image: A Swiffer product prototype being tested by a diverse focus group in a real-world setting. Alt text: A group of people from different backgrounds testing a Swiffer mop in a home environment.]

Overcoming Challenges in Diverse Teams

While diversity drives innovation, it can also present challenges. Differing perspectives may lead to conflict, and unconscious bias can hinder inclusion. To address these issues, organizations must invest in training to mitigate bias, establish clear communication norms, and promote active listening. Leaders should also set shared goals to align diverse teams around a common purpose, ensuring that differences become a source of strength rather than division.

Building Diverse Innovation Teams: Practical Steps

Creating diverse, inclusive innovation teams requires intentional action. Here are five practical steps to get started:

Recruit with Purpose: Actively seek talent from underrepresented groups and diverse disciplines to build a robust talent pipeline.
Foster Psychological Safety: Create a culture where team members feel safe to share ideas and take risks, using tools like anonymous feedback systems.
Use Human-Centered Frameworks: Adopt design thinking or similar approaches to focus on empathy and user needs, leveraging diversity to understand varied audiences.
Train for Inclusion: Provide regular training on unconscious bias and inclusive leadership to ensure all voices are valued.
Measure and Celebrate Success: Track diversity metrics and celebrate innovations driven by diverse teams to reinforce their value.

By implementing these steps, organizations can harness the full potential of diversity to drive innovation that resonates with a global market.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

Diversity is the cornerstone of innovation in a connected world. The case studies of IBM and P&G demonstrate that diverse teams deliver measurable results—higher ROI, breakthrough products, and solutions that serve diverse audiences. But building such teams requires commitment. As leaders, we must challenge ourselves to recruit inclusively, foster psychological safety, and leverage human-centered tools to unlock creativity. The future of innovation depends on our ability to embrace the full spectrum of human potential. Start today—audit your teams, identify gaps in diversity, and take action to build a more inclusive innovation culture.

Image credit: Pexels

Guest AI: Grok

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.