Tag Archives: iphone

Why Conversations Are the New Digital Gold

Leave a reply

The Big New Revenue Opportunity for Google, OpenAI and Anthropic

Why Conversations Are the New Digital Gold

by Braden Kelley and Art Inteligencia

I. Introduction: The Disruption of the Clickstream

For over two decades, the digital economy operated on a straightforward, predictable currency: the clickstream. Organizations built vast marketing engines, customer experience frameworks, and product strategy backlogs around keyword volumes, cost-per-click (CPC) bidding, and web analytics. If you could capture user search intent at the top of the funnel and guide them through a sequence of web pages, you owned the customer relationship.

That paradigm is experiencing an irreversible structural breakdown. We are witnessing a profound behavioral migration away from typing fragmented queries into a text box toward engaging in fluid, multi-turn dialogue with generative AI assistants. Whether users are speaking directly to Gemini on Android and iOS devices or consulting ChatGPT and Claude for complex decision-making, the mechanics of discovery have fundamentally changed.

The Death of “10 Blue Links”

The traditional search results page — dominated by ranked links, banner inventory, and sponsored listings — is giving way to synthesized, conversational answers. When users speak to an ambient assistant, they aren’t looking for a list of websites to evaluate independently; they are seeking a resolved outcome. Speech-to-text, natural voice interaction, and inline AI reasoning mean problem-solving happens within the dialogue itself, drastically reducing the need to visit external brand properties.

The Shrinking Digital Surface Area

This rise in zero-click interactions presents an existential challenge for traditional web analytics and performance marketing. As consumer click-through rates decline, brands face a dramatic reduction in their visible digital touchpoints:

  • Attribution Blindness: Traditional conversion tracking breaks down when the research and evaluation phases occur entirely inside an AI model’s context window.
  • Diminishing SEO Returns: Optimizing for keywords and site traffic yields shrinking returns when AI models synthesize answers directly without referring users to source URLs.
  • Loss of Direct Engagement: The digital surface area where brands can present their unique visual identity, messaging, and experience design is rapidly compressing.

The Foresight Premise

In any major technology transition, structural shifts create immediate information asymmetries. Every change initiative produces winners and losers based on who recognizes where value is re-aggregating. The primary battleground of the AI era is no longer about driving traffic to a destination — it is about controlling, understanding, and translating the rich context of human conversational intent.

II. The Blind Spot: How Brands Are Losing the Voice of the Customer

The transition from traditional web search to ambient AI interaction is creating an unprecedented intelligence blackout for commercial enterprises. For years, organizations refined their understanding of consumer behavior by tracking the digital breadcrumbs left across search engines, landing pages, and digital storefronts. As customer decision-making migrates into private, dynamic AI dialogues, that pipeline of actionable data is drying up.

This shift represents far more than a marketing disruption — it is a fundamental erosion of the qualitative feedback loops that drive modern product innovation and experience design.

From Keywords to Unfiltered Intent

Keyword search was always a compromised, low-fidelity medium. Users learned to compress their complex human needs into unnatural, fragmented phrases meant to nudge a search algorithm into producing useful links. The language of traditional search was structured around constraints rather than context.

Generative AI and voice interfaces have eliminated those constraints. When individuals speak to an assistant like Gemini, ChatGPT, or Claude, they express their needs with full nuance, nuance, and emotional framing. Consider the structural difference between these two modes of inquiry:

  • Traditional Search Query: best running shoes flat feet
  • Conversational Intent: “I’m training for my first rainy marathon in three months, but I have mild overpronation and a old knee injury. What shoes under $150 will give me enough stability without causing blisters on long runs?”

The conversational prompt contains rich layers of context: budget parameters, timeline constraints, physical vulnerabilities, weather considerations, and personal goals. However, because this interaction takes place within an AI context window rather than on a brand’s website or an open search results page, the business whose product is being evaluated receives zero visibility into the exchange.

The Customer Insight Vacuum

As consumer preference formation moves into continuous multi-turn conversations, brands are losing access to critical moments of truth across the buyer journey. This creates three severe operational blind spots:

  • Unseen Feature Trade-offs: Brands cannot see which specific product attributes, specifications, or pricing structures cause a potential customer to eliminate them from consideration during an AI dialogue.
  • Invisible Competitive Comparisons: When an AI assistant evaluates three competing solutions side-by-side for a user, the losing brands receive no signal explaining why the model recommended an alternative.
  • Obsolete Voice-of-Customer (VoC) Data: Traditional surveys, focus groups, and social listening tools capture lagging, highly filtered opinions. They fail to reflect the real-time, unvarnished friction points articulated during natural conversations with AI.

The Experience Design Risk

Without access to the rich contextual signals embedded in everyday user prompts, corporate experience design initiatives risk operating on outdated assumptions. Customer journey maps, persona frameworks, and friction-point analyses quickly become stagnant snapshots of an obsolete digital funnel.

To design meaningful, human-centered experiences, leaders must understand the authentic language and evolving expectations of their audience. When that language is spoken exclusively to third-party AI assistants, organizations that fail to secure access to conversational intelligence will find themselves innovating in the dark.

III. The Big Pivot: Monetizing Context, Not Clicks

Every major shift in technology redistributes economic value. As traditional cost-per-click advertising yields diminish under the pressure of zero-click conversational answers, the business models of the AI platform giants — Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic — must evolve. The next multi-billion-dollar monetization opportunity will not come from placing banner ads inside conversation flows, but from harvesting, structuring, and licensing the vast reservoir of real-time human intent being shared with their models every second.

Human conversation is the new digital gold. For businesses desperate to recover lost visibility into the buyer journey, aggregated conversational intelligence represents the ultimate strategic asset.

The New Revenue Engine for AI Titans

Advertising models built on static keyword triggers are fundamentally mismatched with fluid, multi-turn AI reasoning. Forcing intrusive sponsored links into a personalized voice response destroys the user experience. Instead, AI providers are positioned to monetize the output side of their platforms by acting as enterprise data brokers, transforming raw dialogue logs into high-value intelligence feeds.

By capturing how millions of people naturally discuss needs, compare options, and express frustrations, platform owners can package anonymized context into enterprise-grade analytics products that command recurring software-as-a-service (SaaS) subscription premiums.

Packaging the “Digital Gold”

This new intelligence layer will yield actionable commercial products tailored for product strategists, marketers, and executive leaders:

  • Brand Health & Recommendation Telemetry: Real-time quantitative dashboards tracking how frequently a brand is mentioned during advice seeking, the sentiment surrounding those mentions, and the exact contexts in which competitors are favored.
  • Unmet Need & Latent Demand Mapping: Algorithmic extraction of emerging consumer pain points long before they manifest in formal search trends, support tickets, or market research reports.
  • Decision Boundary & Friction Analysis: Synthesized reports detailing the specific trade-offs (price points, missing features, usability concerns) that systematically cause prospective buyers to reject a product during AI-driven evaluations.

Democratizing Enterprise Intelligence

The power of conversational analytics lies in its scalability across the economic spectrum. While enterprise corporations will pay premium tiers for custom API integrations and real-time category alerts, small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) will finally gain access to market research previously reserved for Fortune 500 budgets.

A local bike shop or boutique software firm could subscribe to a regional category feed to instantly discover the precise features or price barriers driving customer choices in their specific niche. By turning unvarnished human dialogue into structured insight, AI platforms will unlock an indispensable revenue model powered by authentic human context.

IV. Human-Centered Change & Ethical Governance

Unlocking the commercial value of conversational data requires navigating a complex intersection of consumer trust, regulatory compliance, and organizational transformation. Because natural language dialogue contains deep personal context, commercializing this information demands rigorous ethical boundaries. The success of conversational intelligence as a revenue model hinges on maintaining strict user privacy while helping enterprises build the internal capabilities needed to act on these new insights.

Privacy by Design: The Ethical Imperative

Monetizing conversational context cannot come at the expense of individual privacy. AI platform operators must engineer robust data architecture standards that prevent the exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) while preserving strategic utility:

  • Differential Privacy & Aggregation: Injecting mathematical noise into datasets so macro-level consumer trends can be analyzed without ever exposing individual user transcripts.
  • Synthetic Data Modeling: Generating artificial, representative datasets derived from real conversation patterns, allowing brands to analyze buyer behavior without touching live user interactions.
  • Strict Brand-Level Anonymization: Ensuring that enterprise dashboards expose category-level intent and competitive positioning without revealing specific user identities or sensitive personal attributes.

Overcoming the “Surveillance” Backlash

Public perception will determine the speed at which conversational analytics becomes mainstream. If consumers view the monetization of their conversations as invasive surveillance, user churn and regulatory pushback will quickly follow. AI providers and brands must collectively frame conversational analytics around mutual value creation.

When customer intent data is anonymized and applied ethically, it leads directly to better product design, more intuitive user interfaces, and the elimination of persistent market friction points. The objective must be presented clearly: using collective, human-centered feedback to build products and experiences that better serve actual human needs.

Managing Organizational Readiness

Accessing conversational intelligence is only half the equation; corporate leadership teams must also transform how they make decisions. Applying the principles of Human-Centered Change™, organizations must actively prepare their cultures, workflows, and talent to interpret fluid conversational data rather than static web metrics.

This operational transition requires shifting leadership focus away from legacy digital KPIs like bounce rates, page views, and click-through rates toward modern conversational indicators: share of voice in model recommendations, prompt inclusion rates, and conversational intent fulfillment. Companies that successfully align their internal culture around these human-centered insights will build an enduring competitive advantage in the AI era.

V. FutureHacking™: Strategic Implications for Business Leaders

To navigate the shift from transactional clickstreams to continuous conversational context, executive leadership cannot afford a reactive stance. Applying a FutureHacking™ lens — scanning weak signals around emerging user behaviors today to anticipate the structural realities of tomorrow — reveals a multi-phase transformation in how organizations will make decisions, design experiences, and compete for market share.

The transition toward conversational intelligence will unfold across three distinct horizons over the next decade.

Near-Term Horizon (1–2 Years): The Rise of Generative Engine Optimization & Intelligence Pilots

In the immediate term, traditional Search Engine Optimization (SEO) will yield ground to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). As organic web traffic declines, brands will pivot from optimizing page headers and backlinks to structuring brand narratives and product specifications so they are accurately ingested and cited by foundational AI models.

Concurrently, early adopter enterprises will join private pilot programs hosted by Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. These initial telemetry dashboards will give brand managers their first high-level visibility into prompt inclusion rates, category mention frequencies, and overall model recommendation sentiment.

Medium-Term Horizon (3–5 Years): Synthetic Focus Groups & Simulated Customer Journeys

As the granularity of anonymized conversational datasets improves, market research will undergo a radical evolution. Rather than waiting weeks to conduct traditional focus groups or analyze retrospective survey results, product strategy teams will query specialized AI models trained on billions of real-world conversational signals.

Organizations will routinely run product concepts, pricing adjustments, and brand positioning messaging against synthetic persona populations. These simulated customer panels will instantly predict friction points, feature trade-offs, and competitive migration risks based on real-time consumer intent trends, drastically compressing product development cycles.

Long-Term Horizon (5+ Years): Closed-Loop Innovation Systems

Over a five-year horizon, conversational intelligence will move from a passive diagnostic tool to an active driver of automated organizational workflows. Leading enterprises will construct closed-loop innovation engines where real-time conversational data directly informs cross-functional operations:

  • Automated Backlog Prioritization: Product engineering roadmaps will dynamically re-prioritize feature requests based on unprompted feature complaints captured across category-wide AI dialogues.
  • Dynamic Experience Adaptation: Digital touchpoints and customer service flows will auto-tune their messaging and support options based on emerging friction patterns identified by ambient assistants.
  • Continuous Portfolio Alignment: Mergers, acquisitions, and line extensions will be evaluated using continuous, real-time demand signals extracted directly from human-AI problem-solving sessions.

By anticipating these structural horizons today, forward-thinking leaders can begin building the data infrastructure, talent capabilities, and agile decision-making frameworks required to turn conversational signals into market leadership.

VI. Conclusion & Key Takeaways for Innovators

The transition from transactional keyword search to ambient, multi-turn AI dialogue represents one of the most profound structural shifts in the history of the digital economy. As consumers speak directly with Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude on their mobile devices and desktop interfaces, the clickstream era is drawing to a close. Waiting for traditional web traffic, cost-per-click efficiency, and search ad impressions to recover is not just an ineffective strategy — it is an existential risk.

The organizations that thrive in this next era will be those that recognize where strategic value has re-aggregated: away from driving website visits and toward capturing, understanding, and acting upon authentic conversational context.

Key Takeaways for Business Leaders

  • Acknowledge the Intelligence Blackout: Traditional SEO, web analytics, and click-through attribution models are providing a rapidly shrinking window into true customer behavior. Accepting this loss of visibility is the first step toward building modern, conversation-aware capabilities.
  • Prepare for the Conversational Data Economy: As traditional search advertising revenues face long-term pressure, Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic will monetize anonymized conversational data. Forward-thinking leaders should allocate budget now for emerging conversational telemetry feeds and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO).
  • Embed Human-Centered Change™: Shifting an organization from static KPIs (page views, bounce rates) to conversational metrics (share of voice in model answers, prompt inclusion, intent fulfillment) requires intentional change management. Re-align leadership, cross-functional teams, and innovation pipelines around these new signals.
  • Rethink Experience Design: Continuous multi-turn dialogues reveal unvarnished human friction points, budget constraints, and feature trade-offs. Integrate these real-time qualitative signals into your customer journey maps and product development roadmaps to eliminate customer friction faster than competitors. Invest in a Customer Experience Audit to find where you fall short.

Data was the primary oil of the early web era, but synthesized human conversation is the true gold of the AI era. By pairing ethical governance and human-centered design with the rich intent embedded in everyday dialogue, innovative organizations can illuminate their blind spots, transform their decision-making, and create products that resonate with authentic human needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are traditional search advertising and click-through rates declining?
As users shift from keyword-based search boxes to ambient AI assistants like Google Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude, they receive direct, synthesized answers rather than a list of web links. This rise in zero-click interactions significantly reduces website referral traffic and traditional ad impression volume.
How do AI platforms like Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic plan to monetize conversational data?
AI platform providers can package anonymized, aggregated conversation logs into enterprise intelligence feeds. By selling brand health telemetry, unmet need analytics, and consumer friction insights to businesses, AI companies create a massive new recurring revenue stream to complement or offset declining search ad yields.
How can businesses prepare for the shift from keyword search to conversational intelligence?
Organizations must transition their digital strategy from traditional SEO to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), adapt internal change management frameworks (such as Human-Centered Change™) to track conversational metrics like model share-of-voice, and subscribe to emerging conversational analytics feeds to inform product design and experience strategies.


Image credits: Gemini

Content Authenticity Statement: The topic area, key elements to focus on, etc. were decisions made by Braden Kelley, with a little help from Gemini to clean up the article.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Crossing the Possibility Space

Leave a reply

Crossing the Possibility Space

GUEST POST from Dennis Stauffer

Innovators are those who push themselves to move from what’s currently possible to what they hope will become possible—if they can make it happen. Doing that means crossing the space—that possibility space—between the two.

It’s the space Steve Jobs entered when he developed the iPhone, and where Elon Musk ventured when he launched SpaceX. It’s the space Florence Nightingale stepped into when she invented modern nursing and hospital cleanliness. The space Marie Curie crossed when she discovered radioactivity. And, that Muhammad Yunus was exploring when he created microloans to support third world entrepreneurs.

It’s a space roamed by countless inventors, scientists, entrepreneurs, change agents, social reformers—and perhaps people like you. This possibility space can be treacherous. Failure is common. Many never make it across. But for those with the courage to try and the personal capabilities to navigate through it, it’s an exciting journey and the rewards are immense.
To innovate successfully, you must be willing to step into that space, and know how to make your way through it. That often requires innovation tools and strategies. But above all, it takes a certain mindset—an innovator mindset.

An innovator mindset is your ticket across this possibility space, and the compass you use to navigate your way through it. It’s a mindset that helps you decide what you need to pack for the trip and how to find your way past those inevitable obstacles. It’s believing in the value of imagination over knowledge, in the courage to take risks, in a clear-eyed assessment of the challenges ahead, and an openness to understanding the world in entirely new ways.

What possibility space would you like to cross? In your work and in your life? What are your dreams and aspirations? Are you ready to get started?

A video version of this post is included below:

Image Credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Human Element in Futurism

Leave a reply

Understanding What Drives Tomorrow’s Behaviors

The Human Element in Futurism

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

We live in a world obsessed with technological predictions. We meticulously track Moore’s Law, debate the singularity of AI, and map the exponential curve of quantum computing. But I argue that this focus on hardware and code misses the single most volatile and vital factor in any prediction: the human being. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, my job is to look beyond the what of technology to the why of behavior. Futurism is not about predicting a new device; it’s about understanding a new human need. The key to successful future-casting — and successful innovation — lies in anchoring technological foresight to the immutable principles of human psychology and anticipating how technology will meet, or fail to meet, our deepest, most enduring needs for connection, control, identity, and security.

The history of failed predictions is littered with technologies that were brilliant on paper but died in the marketplace because they misunderstood or ignored human behavior. We often forget that technology is merely an accelerant; the engine of change is always a shift in human value. To effectively navigate and profit from the future, leaders must perform an exercise I call Behavioral Foresight. This means starting with the timeless human desire (e.g., the need for connection, status, or ease) and then envisioning the scenarios where a disruptive technology either amplifies that desire or simplifies the mechanism for achieving it. When technological capability meets a deep human truth, true transformation occurs.

The Three Drivers of Tomorrow’s Behavior

While the expression of human needs changes with every innovation cycle, the underlying drivers remain constant. Successful futurism anticipates the convergence of technology with these three enduring pillars:

  • 1. The Need for Control and Autonomy: As the world becomes more complex, people inherently seek more control over their personal data, time, and environment. Any technology that democratizes power, decentralizes decision-making, or gives the individual greater agency (from blockchain to personalized health trackers) is inherently aligned with a fundamental human driver.
  • 2. The Pursuit of Ease (Frictionless Living): We are wired to conserve energy. Innovations that eliminate friction, simplify complex processes, or reduce cognitive load will always win. This is why a one-click purchase button is more successful than a three-step form, and why seamless integration beats powerful but complex software. Tomorrow’s successful behaviors are the easiest ones.
  • 3. The Desire for Authentic Identity and Belonging: Technology may connect us globally, but it also creates anxiety around authenticity and status. The future of social platforms and digital identities will be driven by platforms that allow for niche, meaningful connections and give people powerful tools to express their unique, evolving selves, resisting the homogenizing forces of mass culture.

“Predicting technology is easy. Predicting human behavior is the only thing that matters.”

Case Study 1: The Smartphone Revolution – Prioritizing Connection Over Capability

The Failed Prediction:

In the early 2000s, many tech experts predicted that the future of mobile phones would be driven by technical capability — faster processors, superior cameras, and advanced features. The prevailing wisdom was that professional and power users would be the primary adopters of these complex devices.

The Human-Centered Reality:

The iPhone’s success was not initially built on its superior processing power (which lagged behind competitors at launch), but on its ability to satisfy the human need for frictionless connection and belonging. The seamless interface, the easy access to email and social platforms, and the intuitive camera made it a powerful social tool, not just a business device. The killer applications were not spreadsheets; they were instant messaging, photo sharing, and social networking. The success was driven by the average person’s need to feel constantly connected and to easily share their lived experience. It prioritized the human element (ease, connection) over the technical element (raw power).

The Key Behavioral Insight:

The market demonstrated that people will tolerate significant complexity behind the scenes (processor architecture, network latency) if the interface perfectly addresses their core human need for immediate, effortless social interaction. The future of mobile wasn’t about power; it was about proximity to people.

Case Study 2: The Failure of Google Glass – When Status Conflicts with Comfort

The Technological Promise:

Google Glass was a technological marvel: a discreet, wearable computer that promised to deliver information directly into the user’s field of vision, representing the ultimate fusion of digital information and physical reality. Technically, it was a leap forward, aimed at maximizing efficiency and access to data.

The Human-Centered Failure:

Despite the technical brilliance, Glass failed spectacularly in the consumer market, largely because it created severe friction in two fundamental human areas: social identity and control.

  • Identity/Belonging: Users felt self-conscious, and the public saw the wearers — dubbed “Glassholes” — as arrogant or intrusive. The device was perceived as a symbol of status and exclusion, making the wearer feel separate rather than integrated.
  • Control/Security: The always-on camera and recording capability deeply violated the social contract of trust and privacy, making non-wearers feel a profound lack of control over their own image and security in the wearer’s presence.

The technology ignored the human truth that people value their sense of comfort, privacy, and social acceptance far more than instant access to search results.

The Key Behavioral Insight:

The market demonstrated that any technology that infringes upon the psychological safety and social norms of the community will be rejected, regardless of its utility. The human need for social acceptance and privacy trumped the efficiency gains offered by the wearable tech.

Conclusion: The Future is Human-Shaped

The most enduring innovations are not those that change the most things, but those that understand the things that never change—the immutable drivers of human behavior. Technology simply provides new pathways to fulfill these old needs.

For any leader charting a course into the future, your greatest tool is not a crystal ball or a supercomputer; it is radical empathy. You must look at emerging technologies through the lens of human psychology. Ask: Does this technology simplify an ancient frustration? Does it amplify a core need for connection? Does it empower the individual or take away their control?

The convergence of technological capability and human truth is where true value is created. By centering your future-casting on the timeless human element, you move beyond mere trendspotting to true FutureHacking – proactively shaping a world that is not only technologically advanced but also genuinely human-centered and aligned with the aspirations of the people it serves.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: 1 of 950+ FREE quote slides available at http://misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Balancing Creativity and Feasibility in Innovation

Leave a reply

Balancing Creativity and Feasibility in Innovation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Innovation. The very word pulsates with the promise of progress, often conjuring visions of breakthroughs that reshape industries and improve lives. Yet, beneath the glamour of the “aha!” moment lies a truth often overlooked: a brilliant idea, no matter how disruptive, is merely a whisper in the wind until it can be brought to tangible reality. This is the central paradox, the vital tension, at the heart of truly impactful innovation: the intricate dance between unbridled creativity and grounded feasibility.

Far too often, organizations stumble by overemphasizing one aspect at the expense of the other. Some become playgrounds for “innovation theater,” where whiteboard sessions brim with fantastical concepts, yet none ever see the light of day. These companies generate a flurry of ideas but lack the rigor to assess and execute them. Conversely, others are so risk-averse and steeped in pragmatism that their innovation becomes painfully incremental. They prioritize what’s immediately achievable, effectively stifling any truly transformative thinking and missing the larger opportunities that emerge from challenging the status quo.

“Ideas are easy. Execution is everything.” – John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins

The Indispensable Partnership: Creativity & Feasibility

Imagine creativity as the boundless ocean – vast, deep, and full of unexplored possibilities. It’s the engine of divergent thinking, pushing us to challenge assumptions, question norms, and explore uncharted territories. It asks, “What if? What else could we do? How might we completely reimagine this?”

Feasibility, then, is the experienced navigator and the robust ship. It represents convergent thinking, meticulously evaluating constraints, assessing available resources, and charting a realistic, sustainable course. It asks, “Can we truly build this? Is it sustainable at scale? Do we have the necessary resources and capabilities? What are the inherent risks, and how can we mitigate them?”

The magic happens not when one dominates the other, but when they engage in a continuous, iterative dialogue. An initial creative spark is immediately subjected to a feasibility lens. This check doesn’t kill the idea; rather, it often sparks *new* creative solutions to overcome identified obstacles, refine the concept, or pivot towards an even stronger, viable solution. It’s a cyclical process, a perpetual feedback loop where each refines and strengthens the other.

Case Study 1: Apple’s iPhone – Synthesizing Vision with Viability

Apple’s iPhone – Synthesizing Vision with Viability

When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in 2007, it wasn’t just another mobile phone. It was a audacious creative leap – a seamless convergence of a phone, a widescreen iPod, and a breakthrough internet device, all controlled by a revolutionary multi-touch interface. The vision was to eliminate physical buttons, create an intuitive operating system from scratch, and integrate a vast, extensible application ecosystem.

However, the true genius of Apple wasn’t just in the audacious creative vision; it was in their unparalleled mastery of feasibility. They didn’t just dream big; they possessed the engineering prowess, supply chain expertise, and manufacturing discipline to turn that dream into a polished, mass-market reality. They painstakingly solved immense technical hurdles: perfecting the responsive multi-touch screen, miniaturizing powerful processors, optimizing battery life for constant connectivity, and building a robust, scalable software platform (iOS) that could attract developers. This wasn’t merely invention; it was the meticulous synthesis of creative foresight with an unwavering commitment to practical execution and scalability. Apple understood that for the creative vision to truly disrupt, it had to be undeniably *feasible*.

Case Study 2: Blockbuster vs. Netflix – The Peril of Myopic Feasibility

Blockbuster vs. Netflix – The Peril of Myopic Feasibility

Consider the stark contrast between Blockbuster and Netflix. Blockbuster, once the reigning king of video rentals, was deeply anchored in the feasibility of its existing physical store model. Their enormous physical infrastructure, established supply chains, and predictable revenue from late fees represented a very profitable, tangible business. When a nascent Netflix proposed a mail-order DVD service (a creative new approach), Blockbuster famously dismissed it, seeing it as a niche, unfeasible threat to their dominant brick-and-mortar empire.

Netflix, on the other hand, embraced a creative vision of convenience and accessibility that challenged the norm. They started with a relatively simple, feasible model (DVDs by mail) and continually iterated, demonstrating the feasibility of streaming and eventually content production. Blockbuster’s fatal flaw was allowing the perceived short-term feasibility and profitability of their existing model to blind them to the disruptive creative potential of a new one. Their inability to pivot and invest in a new, feasible model for digital distribution, even when the market signals were clear, led to their eventual demise. Netflix, by continuously balancing its creative vision for entertainment delivery with the evolving feasibility of technology, conquered the market.

Cultivating the Innovation Sweet Spot

So, how can organizations consciously foster this crucial balance? It demands a deliberate, integrated approach:

  • Embrace Structured Ideation & Rigorous Filtering: Encourage boundless brainstorming sessions, but immediately follow with structured evaluation frameworks that assess both creative potential (novelty, value proposition) and practical viability (technical feasibility, market fit, resource requirements).
  • Assemble Cross-Functional Catalysts: Break down silos. Bring together diverse perspectives – creative thinkers (designers, strategists), technical experts (engineers, data scientists), and operational pragmatists (finance, supply chain). This diversity ensures ideas are challenged and refined from all angles.
  • Prototype and Test Relentlessly (Lean & Agile): Don’t strive for perfection upfront. Build Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) and prototypes quickly to test core assumptions about both user desirability (creative validation) and technical/business feasibility. Iterate rapidly based on real-world feedback, making feasibility an ongoing learning process, not a final gate.
  • Develop Clear Innovation Pathways: Establish transparent stages in your innovation funnel where ideas are not just generated but rigorously evaluated and refined against both creative aspiration and practical viability criteria. This ensures a healthy pipeline of both breakthrough and incremental innovations.
  • Cultivate a Culture of Psychological Safety: People must feel empowered to propose radical ideas without fear of immediate dismissal, and equally safe to voice genuine concerns about feasibility without being labeled as negative or unsupportive. Open, honest dialogue is paramount.

Ultimately, true innovation isn’t about conjuring magic; it’s about disciplined imagination. It’s understanding that the most brilliant ideas are only half the battle. The other, often more challenging half, is the art and science of transforming that brilliance into tangible value for customers and the organization. By consciously nurturing the dynamic interplay between creativity and feasibility, organizations can transcend mere ideation and consistently deliver impactful innovation that truly reshapes the future.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Balancing Data-Driven Decision Making with Intuition in Innovation

Leave a reply

Balancing Data-Driven Decision Making with Intuition in Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the fast-paced world of innovation, leaders are often faced with the challenge of making critical decisions that can determine the success or failure of their initiatives. The rise of big data and advanced analytics has given organizations the tools to drive decisions based on empirical evidence. However, the role of intuition—those gut feelings honed by experience and tacit knowledge—remains irreplaceable. In this article, we will explore how to balance data-driven decision making with intuition, providing insights through two revealing case studies.

Case Study 1: Apple and the iPhone

When Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone in 2007, it revolutionized mobile technology. But this groundbreaking innovation wasn’t solely the product of data-driven decision making.

Data-Driven Insights

  • Apple analyzed the shortcomings of existing mobile phones in terms of user experience and functionality.
  • Market data indicated a growing interest in smartphones with internet capabilities, touchscreens, and multimedia features.
  • Advanced analytics helped Apple understand usage patterns, which influenced design elements like the touchscreen interface.

Intuitive Leadership

  • Steve Jobs’ intuition played a critical role in deciding to pursue the development of the iPhone despite potential risks.
  • He envisioned a device that combined a phone, an iPod, and an internet communicator, a concept unheard of at the time.
  • Jobs made bold decisions on user experience features based on his instinctual understanding of what users would love, rather than what traditional market research might suggest.

The iPhone’s success illustrates how data-driven insights and intuitive leadership can complement each other to bring about transformative innovation.

Case Study 2: Netflix’s Transition to Streaming

Netflix has become synonymous with streaming entertainment, but the company’s journey from DVD rental service to streaming giant was not an obvious path.

Data-Driven Insights

  • Netflix leveraged data from its DVD rental service to understand customer preferences and viewing habits.
  • Subscriber data indicated a shift in consumer demand towards digital content delivery, driven by increasing internet speeds and access to devices.
  • Advanced algorithms and predictive analytics were used to recommend content, enhancing user engagement and satisfaction.

Intuitive Leadership

  • Reed Hastings, co-founder, and CEO of Netflix relied on his intuition when deciding to invest heavily in streaming technology, a risky move at that time.
  • Hastings intuitively understood that consumer behavior was shifting towards a preference for on-demand content, even when the data was still emerging.
  • His vision for the future of entertainment included producing original content, an idea driven in equal parts by intuition and data analytics of viewing trends.

By balancing data insights with intuitive foresight, Netflix was able to successfully pivot its business model, fundamentally changing the entertainment landscape.

Strategies for Balancing Data and Intuition

  • Embrace Collaborative Decision-Making: Encourage teams to integrate both data and intuition when making decisions. Promote discussions that leverage diverse perspectives and experiences.
  • Cultivate a Test-and-Learn Culture: Implement policies that allow for experimentation based on intuition while using data to validate or refine these ideas.
  • Leverage Technology Wisely: Use advanced analytics tools to gather actionable insights, but don’t let them overshadow the value of human intuition and creativity.
  • Continuous Learning and Adaptation: Encourage ongoing learning for leaders and teams to enhance their intuitive abilities and stay updated with data analytics advancements.

Conclusion

In the quest for innovation, it is not a question of choosing between data-driven decision making and intuition. Rather, the key lies in finding the right balance, where data provides a solid foundation for insights and intuition injects creativity and foresight into the decision-making process. The cases of Apple and Netflix illustrate how the fusion of data and intuition can lead to groundbreaking innovations that redefine markets and industries. By adopting strategies that honor both elements, organizations can navigate uncertainty and foster a culture of sustained innovation.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Design Thinking in Product Development

Leave a reply

Driving Success through User-centric Design

Design Thinking in Product Development: Driving Success through User-centric Design

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s fast-paced and highly competitive market, businesses can no longer solely rely on creating products based on assumptions or mere technical feasibility. Instead, they need to embrace a user-centric approach that prioritizes the needs and desires of their target audience. This is where design thinking comes into play. Design thinking is a problem-solving methodology that emphasizes empathy, ideation, prototyping, and continuous iteration. By incorporating design thinking principles into product development, businesses can drive success by delivering products that truly resonate with their users. In this article, we will explore the concept of design thinking and present two case studies that exemplify its effectiveness in creating successful products.

Case Study 1: Apple iPhone – Revolutionizing the Smartphone Industry

The Apple iPhone serves as a remarkable example of how design thinking can drive success in product development. Before the iPhone was introduced in 2007, smartphones were typically bulky, complicated, and lacked an intuitive user interface. Apple understood the need for a revolutionary design that prioritized the user experience. By immersing themselves in the lives of potential users and empathizing with their frustrations, Apple’s team of designers identified key pain points such as complex navigation, limited functionality, and lack of touch-based interaction.

Applying the principles of design thinking, Apple ideated and prototyped various concepts until they arrived at the iconic iPhone design. They focused on simplicity, ease of use, and intuitive gestures, leading to the creation of a touchscreen interface that eliminated the need for physical keyboards. The iPhone’s user-centric design not only won over millions of users but also disrupted the entire smartphone industry. By prioritizing the needs and desires of users, Apple achieved unprecedented success and set new standards for smartphone design.

Case Study 2: Airbnb – Revolutionizing the Hospitality Industry

Airbnb, the popular accommodation platform, utilized design thinking to redefine the hospitality industry. The founders of Airbnb recognized that travelers were seeking unique, affordable, and personalized experiences rather than sterile hotel rooms. By observing potential users and conducting in-depth interviews, they empathized with the pain points of both guests and hosts, including lack of trust, limited options, and cumbersome booking processes.

Applying design thinking principles, Airbnb ideated innovative solutions that addressed these pain points. They created a platform that connected hosts and guests, allowing users to personalize their travel experiences. To instill trust, Airbnb introduced user profiles, reviews, and secure payment systems.

Furthermore, Airbnb continuously iterated its platform based on user feedback, driving greater success. This user-centric approach revolutionized the hospitality industry, empowering individuals to monetize their spaces and providing travelers with unique, affordable, and authentic accommodations.

Conclusion

Design thinking offers a powerful framework for businesses to optimize product development processes. The case studies of Apple iPhone and Airbnb demonstrate how incorporating the principles of design thinking leads to successful, user-centric products. By empathizing with users, identifying pain points, and continuously iterating, businesses can deliver products that not only meet but exceed user expectations. As the market becomes increasingly user-driven, organizations that embrace design thinking have a competitive edge in driving success through user-centric design.

SPECIAL BONUS: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Disruptive Innovation vs. Sustaining Innovation

Leave a reply

Understanding the Difference

Disruptive Innovation vs. Sustaining Innovation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, innovation is often seen as the key to success. Companies are constantly seeking ways to gain a competitive advantage and stay ahead of the curve. Two concepts that often come up in discussions about innovation are disruptive innovation and sustaining innovation. Understanding the difference between these two types of innovation is crucial for companies looking to navigate the ever-changing marketplace effectively. In this article, we will explore the distinctions between disruptive and sustaining innovation and provide two real-world case studies to illustrate their practical applications.

Disruptive Innovation

Disruptive innovation refers to the introduction of a new product, service, or business model that fundamentally changes the existing market dynamics. It often disrupts traditional industries, displacing established products or services. Disruptive innovations usually start by serving niche markets or addressing the needs of under-served customers, eventually gaining traction and undermining existing market leaders. They often offer unique value propositions or bring significant cost advantages, enabling them to capture previously overlooked customer segments.

One prominent case study of disruptive innovation is Uber. Before Uber entered the transportation industry, traditional taxi services dominated the market. However, Uber brought a revolutionary business model by leveraging technology to connect passengers directly with drivers using their own vehicles. This disruptive approach offered several advantages like lower fares, real-time tracking, and cashless payments, giving it a competitive edge over traditional taxi services. This innovation not only transformed the ride-hailing industry but also revolutionized urban transportation around the world.

Sustaining Innovation

In contrast to disruptive innovation, sustaining innovation refers to incremental improvements made to existing products, services, or business models. It focuses on enhancing features, quality, or performance, helping companies improve their current market position or maintain a competitive advantage. Sustaining innovation allows companies to meet customer demands, keep up with changing market trends, and strengthen their market share by appealing to existing customers.

Apple’s evolution in the smartphone industry provides a compelling case study for sustaining innovation. When the first iPhone was introduced in 2007, it completely transformed the mobile phone landscape. However, instead of betting everything on a single disruptive innovation, Apple consistently pursued sustaining innovation by releasing new iterations of the iPhone each year. These subsequent models offered incremental improvements like faster processors, better cameras, and enhanced user experiences. By continually enhancing their product, Apple was able to maintain its market dominance and keep customers engaged, despite fierce competition from rival smartphone manufacturers.

Understanding the Difference

Differentiating between disruptive and sustaining innovation is crucial for businesses looking to adapt and thrive in today’s dynamic market environment. Disruptive innovation represents breakthrough changes that challenge existing norms, while sustaining innovation represents iterative enhancements aimed at maintaining market leadership.

By understanding the difference between these two forms of innovation, companies can make informed decisions about their strategic direction. They can identify opportunities for disruptive innovation to explore new markets, attract under-served customers, and potentially disrupt established industries. Simultaneously, they can also focus on sustaining innovation to enhance their existing products or services, ensuring they stay relevant and competitive.

Conclusion

Disruptive innovation and sustaining innovation play distinct roles in driving business success. While disruptive innovation can revolutionize industries and create new markets, sustaining innovation is essential for maintaining market dominance and satisfying current customer demands. Striking the right balance between these two forms of innovation can shape a company’s growth and longevity in an ever-evolving market.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Apple Announces Name Change to App-le

Leave a reply

Apple Announces Name Change to App-le

First Apple changed its name from Apple Computer to Apple to better reflect a business focus that was extending beyond computers to music players, smartphones, digital music sales, and more.

And last week Apple announced a flurry of new products including:

  • iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s plus
  • All new Apple TV
  • iPad Pro
  • watchOS 2
  • iOS9

What was clear from the announcements is that Apple’s view the future of computing and entertainment is an App-centric one.

First Apple created Apps for the iPod. Anyone remember the iPod? Apple barely does. They still make iPods, but they’ve been dropped from the main menu on Apple’s web site and relegated to the text links at the bottom of the page. Then they create Apps for the iPhone and the iPad and the watch. And this past week Apple announced their App-centric vision for the future of television.

What is this vision?

It’s pretty simple really. Want to watch major league baseball (MLB) on your television, buy the MLB app. Want to watch HBO, buy the app. Cartoon Network? Get the app. You get the idea.

Why does Apple have this vision?

This App-centric vision of entertainment grows their ecosystem and enables Apple to make money not only from hardware sales, but also from commissions in the sale of all of these Apps. And as people buy more apps, they lock themselves further into Apple’s hardware, by design.

Apple’s App-centric vision for the future of television is good for creators of popular, quality content like HBO, the National Football League (NFL), Premier League Football, CNN, BBC, and for movie-centric aggregators (Netflix, Amazon). The evolving App-centric approach to television also has the benefit to the content creators of enabling them to build Apps that yes play full-screen video (what people expect), but also to integrate information, commerce and social elements into their Applications as they see fit. The downside is that content creators will lose the perceived safety that cable network bundling offers.

But the smartest, best run content creators are more likely to gradually embrace this App-centric possible future, and as a result Apple’s App-centric television future is likely to be a disaster for cable companies and other television-centric aggregators (Hulu, Sling). Why would you need an intermediary like a cable company when you can go straight to the source?

Cable companies could however try to beat Apple to the App Store model and potentially also beat them to the Spotify model for television if they move quickly. But are speed and courage what cable companies are known for?

YouTube and Facebook could also be big winners in Apple’s App-centric television future as both sites could become the home for a treasure trove of free sample shows, a place for people to discover new content to subscribe to. Facebook has made a big push into video the past few years, making this potential area of growth possible for them.

Apple missed the App-centric transition in music, and they had to go out and overpay for Beats to try and catch up to Spotify and others. They’ve also missed the early days of the App-centric transition in paid video apps as well, with Netflix enjoying the early success. They don’t want to get completely left behind, so they are making their big push towards an App-centric television future. The only question is how?

Will Apple look to create a subscription service like Netflix or Spotify as their App, or focus on promoting content creator Apps (NFL, CNN, etc.) through an App Store, both, or something completely different?

No matter which direction Apple chooses, it’s clear that with Apple it is all about the apps. So will Apple change its name to App-le? Probably not. But, they’ve made it very

clear that their vision for the future is an App-centric one. Will they be able to realize it?

Image credit: mashable.com

This article originally appeared on Linkedin


Accelerate your change and transformation success

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Can Windows 10 Disrupt Android and Get Microsoft Back in Handset Game?

Leave a reply

Microsoft Tries to Disrupt Mobile Phone Market

Can Windows 10 Disrupt Android and Get Microsoft Back in Handset Game?I came across an article on Mashable recently highlighting a new Microsoft experiment. It highlights something that Microsoft has prototyped to test as part of their strategy to regain momentum in the mobile phone market by focusing on markets outside the United States where the first generation of the smartphone adoption battle hasn’t already been decided.

The first Microsoft branded phones are now appearing in the market as the relevance of the Nokia brand in the mobile phone market has nearly completely disappeared. With a single digit market share, Microsoft has to do something disruptive to get back in the game and get some value out of their huge Nokia acquisition. Most people would say that doing something disruptive is outside of Microsoft’s comfort zone, but there are examples to the contrary where Microsoft has been more innovative than Google or Apple, so nothing is impossible.

So enough buildup. What exactly is Microsoft fooling around with as a potential strategy to get back in the global smartphone market?

It is this…

Microsoft is working with Xiaomi to prove that it is possible to bring Windows to Android hardware. The technical details aren’t all that important, the bigger question is whether Android handset owners would consider doing this or not.

The big value proposition highlighted in the Mashable article is that Windows is less hungry for resources than Android and so especially for people with older smartphones the switch could make their handset feel more responsive. Someone switching like this probably wouldn’t make Microsoft any immediate money, but of course the hope would be that when they upgraded that they would choose a Microsoft OS handset for their next smartphone.

As someone who ditched his Android phone for a Nokia Lumia phone running Windows Phone and never looked back, I can confirm that Windows Phone is better than Android (althought the App selection is much smaller).

Given that Windows Phone biggest weakness is probably App availability, Microsoft better do everything they can to convert phones over to their new Windows 10 OS, other way that gap will never close. Will this experiment be fully unleashed? Will it work? Could Microsoft disrupt the smartphone market and get back in the game with this approach?

I guess only time will tell.

In the meantime, if you want to see more, check out the video above and work on your Chinese at the same time.

If you’re not sure what I meant by seamless computing when I referred to it above, I encourage you to check out my previous article – Cloud Computing is Dead, Long Live the Cloud! (which is also available as a narrated audio file)


Accelerate your change and transformation success

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Is there a market for Smartwatches? Can Apple create one?

Leave a reply

Stikkee 3 - Apple Watch

Okay, it’s been a week since the Apple Watch was announced, and do you know what the world’s most popular wearable is likely to be for 2014/2015?

It’s not the iWatch, but the iPhone 6, which is breaking the pre-sales records of the iPhone 5.

No, it’s not an iWatch. Don’t you dare call it that!

We’re Apple and we’ve decided that it’s far too sophisticated and exclusive to be an iWatch.

Oh, and we’ve also decided that you must own at least an iPhone 5 to be privileged enough to wear an Apple Watch.

Okay, so instantly Apple has reduced the potential market size for the Apple Watch from 6 Billion people to about 100 million people (based on statisticbrain’s numbers).

Now, layer on top of this the fact that in a YPulse survey of millenials, only 32% stated that they wear a watch regularly.

$96 million of smartwatches were sold between October and July according to CNet at an average price of $189 (and dropping fast) – often bundled with a phone – and with Samsung wrapping up 78% of the market. If you do the math, that’s just over 500,000 units, less than 1% of the likely iPhone 5 sales over the same period.

The Apple Watch starts at $349.

But wait, we’re not done yet.

Consider that Samsung has become a faster, nimbler innovator in some ways than Apple and are shipping a new version of their smartwatch next month, up to six months before the Apple Watch is expected to be available – oh, and you’ll be able to use their new watch to make phone calls and run lots of wellness apps (including some from Nike). Plus Samsung will probably launch an even more capable version shortly after the Apple Watch starts shipping.

Apple’s already playing catchup in the smartphone market and they haven’t even shipped their first unit.

So if Apple is entering a small market with a declining average unit price against a more nimble competitor, what rabbit do they have up their sleeve to grow the market and increase their stock price?

What will make the Apple Watch a must have?

The iPod was a must have because it allowed you to carry your entire music library around with you after easily organizing it on your PC and syncing it to the iPod. After that you could then easily navigate thousands of songs on the device with the handy click wheel.

The iPhone was a must have because it became the world’s most widely adopted personal, wearable computer. The iPhone disrupted the balance of power in the mobile phone industry and allowed device makers to start offering whatever applications they wanted (unencumbered by the carriers). The iPhone also disrupted the digital camera market, the Flip (super portable, simple video cameras), and the dedicated GPS market.

Other wearables are on the decline.

iPod sales in Q4 2013 were down 52% from Q4 2012.

Google Glasses got a lot of buzz early on, but interest has fizzled.

Fitbits and Nike Fuelbands have lost their luster and momentum.

Even the iPad, which became a must have after Apple solved the Value Translation riddle and properly highlighted its benefits as a more relaxing and accessible computing device, has seen sales fall the past two quarters as the large screen phones have started to become big enough to begin decreasing the need for a separate tablet. If you’re keeping score the iPad disrupted the gaming industry and challenged people to think deeply about their computing device preferences.

Now back to the Apple Watch…

Can a smartwatch really unseat the mother of all wearables, the smartphone?

In an era of declining interest in watches, can Apple change people’s behavior and lead a resurgence in watch wearing?

These are all very tough questions, but they are not tough challenges that Apple hasn’t faced before.

It’s easy to forget that the iPod didn’t become a runaway success until two years after its launch (with the launch of the PC version of iTunes), and that it took a year for Apple to really ramp up sales of the iPhone (after the launch of the App Store), or that Apple got killed in the press after the announcement of the iPad but figured out how to translate its value by the time they started shipping it.

So, is Apple up to the challenge this time?

After their recent string of game-changing innovations the pressure is on!

Please note the following licensing terms for Stikkee Situations cartoons:

1. BLOGS – Link back to https://bradenkelley.com/category/stikkees/ and you can embed them for free
2. PRESENTATIONS, please send $25 to me on PayPal by clicking the button 3. NEWSLETTERS & WEB SITES, please send me $50 on PayPal by clicking the button
License for presentations - $25
License for newsletters and web sites - $50

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.