Ethical Considerations in Adopting Emerging Technologies

Ethical Considerations in Adopting Emerging Technologies

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the rapidly evolving world of technology, the race to innovate is often fraught with ethical dilemmas. As both a human-centered change agent and thought leader, it’s crucial to address the implications of emerging technologies on society. The discourse should not focus solely on what technology can achieve, but rather on what it should achieve without compromising ethical standards. This article explores these considerations through two case studies, illustrating both cautionary tales and promising practices.

Case Study 1: Facial Recognition Technology

Facial recognition technology has rapidly integrated into various sectors, offering benefits from enhanced security measures to personalized user experiences. However, its implementation hasn’t been without ethical pitfalls.

Consider the case of facial recognition in law enforcement. While it provides a powerful tool for identifying suspects, studies have shown a high rate of false positives, particularly among minority groups. This raises ethical concerns about racial bias and privacy infringement.

San Francisco became the first major U.S. city to ban its use by law enforcement, setting a precedent for others. The decision stemmed from community concerns about surveillance overreach and the potential for discrimination. This case highlights the need for ethical frameworks that prioritize transparency, accountability, and fairness in deploying such technologies.

Case Study 2: Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) promise enhanced safety and convenience, yet their development has stirred ethical debates. The programming of AVs involves complex ethical decision-making that must balance safety, liability, and morality.

One scenario often referenced is the “trolley problem”—how should an AV be programmed when faced with a split-second decision that could harm passengers or bystanders? Regulatory and ethical guidelines are still evolving to address such dilemmas.

The case of Uber’s self-driving car accident, where a pedestrian was tragically killed, underscores the urgency of addressing these issues. The incident led to increased scrutiny and the creation of safety frameworks that demand comprehensive testing, transparency, and clear ethical guidelines to ensure such technologies prioritize human life.

Moving Forward: Ethical Frameworks for Technology Adoption

To navigate these ethical waters, organizations and policymakers must develop robust frameworks that guide the ethical adoption of emerging technologies. Key components should include:

  • Inclusive Design: Engage diverse stakeholders in the design process to ensure technologies serve all groups equitably.
  • Accountability Mechanisms: Establish clear lines of accountability to address misuse or errors in technology deployment.
  • Transparent Policies: Implement transparent policies that inform the public about how data is collected, used, and protected.

By incorporating these principles, we can foster innovation that not only accelerates growth but also aligns with our ethical values. The future of technology must be shaped by thoughtful consideration of its impacts on humanity, ensuring that its benefits do not come at the cost of our ethical principles.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Cultural Change Goes Beyond Structures and Processes

Cultural Change Goes Beyond Structures and Processes

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the realm of organizational transformation, many leaders focus predominantly on altering structures and processes. While these elements are critical, true cultural change transcends mere mechanics. It permeates the essence of human interactions and the underlying beliefs within an organization. To achieve sustainable cultural change, one must delve deeper into the nuances of human-centered design and leadership.

The Essence of Cultural Change

Structural and procedural changes often provide the framework for transformation, but the real challenge lies in reshaping the mindset and behaviors of individuals. Culture is not just “the way we do things around here”; it is a dynamic entity influenced by shared values and the collective identity of an organization.

Human-centered change emphasizes empathy, active listening, and ongoing engagement. Leaders must recognize that individuals need to feel seen, heard, and valued to embrace change genuinely. Building trust and facilitating open dialogues are essential steps toward this holistic approach.

Case Study 1: Zappos – Delivering Happiness Through Culture

Zappos, the renowned online retailer, offers a compelling example of cultural transformation beyond structures and processes. When CEO Tony Hsieh took the helm, he prioritized company culture as a driver of success. His philosophy was simple yet profound: happy employees lead to happy customers.

To embed this cultural philosophy, Zappos introduced a “cultural fit” interview during its hiring process, ensuring alignment with its core values. Hsieh also championed transparency and open communication between all levels of staff, fostering a family-like atmosphere. The company’s unique culture became its competitive edge, exemplifying that when employees are empowered and valued, they become passionate and innovative contributors.

Case Study 2: The Transformation of Microsoft

Under Satya Nadella’s leadership, Microsoft underwent a remarkable cultural shift from a know-it-all culture to a learn-it-all culture. Recognizing that innovation stems from curiosity and learning, Nadella inspired a move away from rigid hierarchies toward a culture that fosters collaboration and continuous learning.

Microsoft’s “Growth Mindset” initiative emphasized the importance of embracing challenges and valuing feedback as a tool for personal and professional growth. By cultivating a more inclusive and open environment, Microsoft saw increased innovation and revitalized its employee engagement and satisfaction, driving its resurgence as a tech leader.

Moving Forward: Steps for Leaders

For leaders striving to enact human-centered cultural change, it is vital to lead with empathy and clarity. Begin by identifying and articulating the core values you wish to see flourish in your organization. Model these values consistently and reward behaviors that align with them.

Encourage cross-functional collaboration and create opportunities for employees to connect on a personal level. These interactions build the social fabric that sustains a positive culture. Regularly gather feedback and be willing to pivot strategies based on the insights gained.

Ultimately, cultural change is a continuous journey rather than a destination. By focusing on the human experience beyond structures and processes, leaders can cultivate a resilient, innovative, and thriving organizational culture.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: 1 of 850+ FREE quote slides available at misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Surfacing Your Hidden Assumptions

Successful strategy and innovation are about how fast you can become aware of your assumptions.

Surfacing Your Hidden Assumptions

GUEST POST from Soren Kaplan

When it comes to strategy and innovation, success depends on how fast you become aware of your assumptions and then modify them. But it’s a paradox:  You can’t see your most fundamental assumptions until you overcome them. This means that you can only understand your mindsets that were barriers retrospectively.

Let’s look at how this works. I have a quick story for you, then a question.

A bus driver was heading down Van Ness Avenue in my hometown of San Francisco. He went through a stop sign without even slowing down, then turned onto a one-way street going the opposite direction as the rest of the traffic. A police officer saw the whole thing but he didn’t stop him or issue a ticket because no laws had been broken. The question for you is this: How can this scenario be possible?

If you answered that the bus driver was walking down the street, you are correct. This is a very simple example to illustrate how we all make assumptions. Most people just assume that a bus driver is always driving a bus. But of course, that’s not the case. The most important part of this exercise isn’t to point out that an assumption may have been made in the first place – it’s only natural to do so. It’s to show that most of us only recognize that we’ve made an assumption after we’ve discovered that our thinking was invalid or that it led us astray. And by then, it can often be “too late.”

Let’s go back to the bus driver for a moment. What if I had framed things up in the scenario a little differently and included another statement up front that said “In San Francisco, people use cars, take the bus, or walk down the street to get where they’re going.”  How would this have impacted your assumptions? For most people, the idea that it’s possible the bus driver could be walking down the street would have been planted in their brains as they read the rest of the scenario – and they would have more easily overcome their limiting assumption that bus drivers only drive buses. The goal is to continually broaden your perspective so that you can overcome your assumptions before they limit your options or slow you down.

Here are a couple of tried and true approaches I’ve used to challenge and expand mindsets.

Identify Areas of Intrigue

When it comes to developing your strategy or innovating, get clear on what you need to know and learn. List up to 4-5 topics. Examples might include things like board games children like most, the healthiest yet best tasting desserts, or the most successful social media influencers. For each topic, create a list of guiding questions that, if answered, would really give you a solid understanding of the area. For instance, using the board games children like mostexample, you could come up with questions like: What are the most popular children’s board games? How long do the best games take to play? Do adults usually play with the children? What does it take to win? This exercise will help you better understand what’s most important to further explore so you can broaden your perspective.

Adapt a Business Model

Find a company completely outside of your industry or market and look at what makes them different and what they do really well.  Then adapt their model to your cause.  Use the format “I want to be the ____________ of ____________” by putting a company name into the first blank and the area of your target market or innovation area into the second blank.  For example, if you want to transform the fashion industry, you might try “I want to be the Netflix of fashion”, which could lead you down the path of high-end evening gown rental services like Rent the Runway.  Consider companies like Starbucks, Twitter, Domino’s, NIKE, Home Depot, or any other innovative company you can think of.

Your mindsets naturally constrain your ability to consider alternatives and possibilities that go beyond the boundaries of your thinking. Your limiting assumptions can be about personal skills, team knowledge and abilities, organizational capabilities, market needs, technology, financial limitations, partnership possibilities, competition, or just about anything else. The goal is to recognize you hold assumptions and then act to surface them.

As the writer John Seely Brown once said, the harder you fight to hold on to specific assumptions, the more likely there’s gold in letting go of them.

Image credit: Pexels

This article was originally published on Inc.com and has been syndicated for this blog.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Prototyping with Users is a Human-Centered Approach to Testing Ideas

Prototyping with Users is a Human-Centered Approach to Testing Ideas

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the rapidly evolving landscape of innovation, creating solutions that resonate with users is more crucial than ever. The key to successful innovation is not just creating value but delivering it in a way that meets users’ needs and expectations. This is where human-centered prototyping comes into play. By involving users in the prototyping process, organizations can gather valuable insights, refine their ideas, and ultimately create more meaningful products and services.

Why Human-Centered Prototyping?

Traditional approaches to prototyping often place the design team at the center, focusing on functionality and technical feasibility. However, this can lead to solutions that miss the mark in terms of user experience and desirability. Human-centered prototyping, on the other hand, involves users as co-creators. This approach ensures that prototypes are not only technically sound but also aligned with users’ real-world needs and behaviors.

1. Engaging Users Early and Often

By bringing users into the prototyping phase from the start, organizations can uncover unexpected use cases, validate assumptions, and identify pain points that may not be immediately obvious. Engaging users early helps to build empathy and ensures that the final product is grounded in reality.

2. Rapid Iteration and Feedback Loops

Human-centered prototyping emphasizes rapid iteration. By quickly creating and testing prototypes with users, teams can learn and adapt in real-time. This continuous feedback loop encourages experimentation and reduces the risk of costly failures further down the line.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Airbnb’s Evolution through User Insights

Airbnb’s rise to prominence is a testament to the power of user-centered prototyping. In its early days, the founders faced significant challenges in gaining traction. To address this, they adopted a strategy of directly engaging with their users — both hosts and guests.

By conducting in-person visits and creating low-fidelity prototypes of their platform, Airbnb’s team gathered firsthand insights into the needs and pain points of their users. This process revealed critical aspects, such as the importance of trust and the need for detailed property descriptions and quality photos.

Through continuous iteration based on real user feedback, Airbnb was able to refine their platform, resulting in a user experience that feels both personalized and intuitive. This approach was instrumental in transforming their business model into a globally recognized brand.

Case Study 2: IDEO’s Design Thinking in the Healthcare Sector

IDEO, a leader in applying design thinking to solve complex problems, utilized human-centered prototyping to innovate in the healthcare sector. They partnered with a hospital to improve patient experience in the emergency department.

IDEO’s process involved shadowing medical staff, interviewing patients, and creating role-playing scenarios to simulate the patient journey. By developing storyboards and low-fidelity prototypes, they could quickly test and iterate on different aspects of the experience.

One of the key insights was the importance of communication in alleviating patient anxiety. IDEO’s prototypes included redesigned information boards and communication tools that made processes more transparent and efficient. The result was a significant improvement in patient satisfaction and operational efficiency.

Conclusion

Human-centered prototyping is more than just a method; it’s a mindset that prioritizes empathy, collaboration, and real-world validation. By involving users throughout the prototyping process, organizations can create solutions that are not only innovative but also relevant and impactful.

As we move forward, the organizations that embrace this human-centered approach will be best positioned to navigate the complexities of innovation in the digital age. The lessons from companies like Airbnb and IDEO provide a compelling roadmap for leveraging user insights to drive meaningful change and deliver exceptional products and services.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Creating Innovation with Hardcore Soft Skills

Creating Innovation with Hardcore Soft Skills

Recently I had the opportunity to speak with Yadira Caro on the Hardcore Soft Skills Podcast.

In the episode I define what innovation really is, how people, process and technology come together to create innovation and where people go wrong.

The conversation includes a discussion of how to craft successful innovation teams because it’s such a crucial factor for successful innovation.



I also speak about the peril of idea fragments and the importance of respecting your employees by putting funding and execution capabilities in place BEFORE you ask your employees for even a single idea.

We talk about top-down innovation…

We talk about bottom-up or middle-out innovation…

And, we also speak about many different innovation misconceptions.

So, I encourage you to check out the episode!

You can listen to the embedded podcast above or click this link to go to the podcast page.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

OKRs vs. KPIs: Choosing the Right Framework for Innovation

OKRs vs. KPIs: Choosing the Right Framework for Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the world of innovation, measuring success is as crucial as the innovation process itself (a powerful one being The Eight I’s of Infinite Innovation from Braden Kelley). Among the most popular tools for tracking progress are OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) and KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). Though they often appear interchangeable, each serves distinct purposes and can significantly impact the direction and success of innovation initiatives. So, how do we choose the right framework for fostering innovation?

Understanding OKRs and KPIs

OKRs are a framework that sets ambitious objectives linked with quantifiable key results. Invented by Intel and popularized by Google, OKRs encourage stretching beyond comfort zones to achieve groundbreaking advances.

“OKRs are not about spreadsheets. They are about focused and inspired work.” – John Doerr

KPIs, on the other hand, are metrics used to evaluate the performance of organizations, employees, or particular activities. They are generally well-defined and are used to track targets and processes that are stable and need consistency.

Case Study 1: Google – The Triumph of OKRs

Google’s remarkable growth and innovation can, in part, be attributed to its successful use of OKRs. Larry Page and Sergey Brin adopted OKRs from Intel, aiming to balance daunting aspirations with precise actions.

In a pivotal instance, Google aimed to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” The associated key results included increasing the number of pages indexed and enhancing user satisfaction through a streamlined user interface. This clear alignment of bold objectives and tangible results spurred innovation without stifling creativity, showcasing the transformative power of OKRs.

Case Study 2: A Traditional Manufacturer – The Stability of KPIs

Consider a traditional manufacturing company focused on operational efficiency and quality control. Here, KPIs are indispensable for maintaining precision and reliability in production.

The company aimed to reduce waste and improve product quality. By utilizing KPIs such as scrap rate, production downtime, and customer defect rate, they implemented incremental improvements that led to significant cost savings and enhanced quality.

This structure allowed them to consistently meet customer expectations and stay competitive, showcasing how KPIs serve businesses prioritizing stability and incremental innovation.

When to Use OKRs

OKRs shine in environments where transformative change is sought. Think of startups, tech firms, or any company looking to disrupt the status quo. OKRs encourage risk-taking, freeing teams to explore uncharted territories. They are ideal for organizations that embrace experimentation and are willing to pivot based on insights and discoveries.

When to Use KPIs

KPIs are optimal for situations that require reliability, consistency, and precise tracking. They fit well in established processes where steady improvement and performance monitoring are crucial. Industries like manufacturing, logistics, or healthcare, where the margin for error is minimal, benefit greatly from KPIs.

Integrating OKRs and KPIs for Holistic Innovation

Rather than choosing between OKRs and KPIs, consider blending them. Organizations can leverage the ambitious spirit of OKRs while grounding them with the stable, measurable metrics of KPIs.

For instance, a tech company could set ambitious OKRs to innovate a new product line with radical features, using KPIs to monitor development timelines, budget adherence, and defect rates. Such integration ensures a balance between aspiration and accountability, driving sustainable innovation.

Conclusion

The choice between OKRs and KPIs ultimately hinges on your organizational objectives, industry demands, and desired outcomes. Understanding their intrinsic differences and strategic applications is paramount in optimizing innovation effectiveness.

By carefully considering your framework choice and exploring the potential of combining these tools, businesses can foster an innovative culture that is both adventurous and accountable, paving the way for sustained success.

Innovation thrives on clarity, ambition, and measurable outcomes. Whether through OKRs, KPIs, or a tailor-made blend, harnessing the right framework is key to nurturing the next breakthrough.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Taking Personal Responsibility – Back to Leadership Basics

Taking Personal Responsibility – Back to Leadership Basics

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

I was first introduced to the principle of Taking Personal Responsibility when I attended a number of experiential workshops facilitated by Robert Kiyosaki who is now well known globally as the successful entrepreneurial author of the “Rich Dad Poor Dad” book series. At that time, in the late 1980s, the concept simply involved taking personal responsibility for your role in getting the results you get, in both challenging and problematic situations.

This principle has since evolved as the most crucial foundation for developing our emotionally intelligent, conscious, and transformational leadership capabilities. Largely through focusing on the development of self-awareness and self-regulation skillsets, which are especially important skills to cultivate in times of extreme uncertainty.

Blaming, Justifying, and Denying

Taking personal responsibility involves encouraging people to step up and out of blaming themselves or others, out of justifying their position or denying what is really going on to largely avoid the cognitive, emotional, and visceral results and consequences of their actions.

Which are essentially, largely unconscious defensive reactions to the problem or situation. So, it sounds quite simple, yet, even now, it’s still largely a countercultural principle, and a neurologically challenging one, because we are wired to survive (fight/flight/freeze) in the face of what we perceive as danger!

Especially when many of us are living in an oppositional blaming and shaming political environment, or within a passively or aggressively defensive organizational culture. Where a large section of the community, has been forced by the constraints of the pandemic, into fearing that their security and survival needs will not be met. Alternately, the great resignation and the nature of the virtual hybrid workplace have increased some people’s fears about even being able to get their jobs done!

All of this creates distorted thoughts and language that focus on “scarcity” where many people are fearing that they are not “enough” and do not have “enough” to deal with their current circumstances. Rather than leaning towards exploring and eliciting the possibilities and opportunities available in our abundant world.  As there is no clear playbook about how people can effectively and responsibly lead and manage in this unique 21st-century context, many people are floundering, languishing into largely emotionally overwhelmed states.

Where it is easier, and sometimes safer, to be a victim, blame and shame others for their helpless or powerless situation, or to justify and deny any need to change their perspective about it, never mind their role in causing their own anxious and unresourceful emotional states.

Back to Leadership Basics

Yet, it is more important than ever, for leaders and managers to help people:

  • Take ownership of their consequences and be responsible for the emotional, cognitive, and visceral results of their actions,
  • Authentically connect, empower, and enable people and communities to flourish,
  • Provide safe, transparent, trusted environments and interdependence where people can dare to think differently and potentially thrive.

This means that the range of crises, uncertainty, and disruptions we are experiencing now is forcing us to go back to basic 101 management and leadership principles.

According to McKinsey & Co in a recent article “A Leaders Guide – communicating with teams, stakeholders and communities during Covid 19” – “Crises come in different intensities. As a “landscape-scale” event, the coronavirus has created great uncertainty, elevated stress and anxiety, and prompted tunnel vision, in which people focus only on the present rather than toward the future. During such a crisis, when information is unavailable or inconsistent, and when people feel unsure about what they know (or anyone knows), behavioral science points to an increased human desire for transparency, guidance, and making sense out of what has happened”.

The Maturity Continuum – Shifting to I and We

The principle of taking personal responsibility has evolved and been enhanced significantly through the work of Steve Covey, in the “Seven Habits of Effective People” and provides the core foundations for transformational and conscious leadership through the “Maturity Continuum”:

  1. Dependence is the paradigm of you – you take care of me; you come through for me; you didn’t come through for me; I blame you for the results. Dependent and approval-seeking people need others to get what they want.
  2. Independence is the paradigm of I – can do it; I am responsible; I am self-reliant; I can choose. Independent people get what they want through their own efforts.
  3. Interdependence is the paradigm of we – we can do it; we can cooperate; we can combine our talents and abilities and create something greater together. Interdependent people combine their efforts with the efforts of others to achieve their greatest success.

Putting the Maturity Continuum to Work

In the early 2000s I was an associate of Corporate Vision, Australia’s first culture change and transformation consultancy, now the globally successful Walking the Talk organisation, for fourteen years.

Where every culture, leadership, team development, or change program we designed and presented, introduced taking personal responsibility, as a fundamental, core learning principle. Aligning it with the principle of – For things to change first I must change, which deeply challenged and disrupted people’s belief systems, habitual mindsets, thinking styles, and ways of acting.

As a seasoned coach of twenty years, these two core principles seem to still profoundly challenge the majority of my coaching clients across the world, no matter how senior their role or position is, or how knowledgeable, skilled, and experienced they are!

Where many managers and leaders have failed to self-regulate, lack self-awareness, and have unconsciously slipped into feeling victimized, powerless, helpless, and in some instances, even hopeless about their futures where some are:

  • Feeling frozen, inert, paralyzed, overwhelmed, and immobilized in their abilities to affect any kind of positive change in both their work and home environments.
  • Unconsciously slipping into blaming and shaming others for their situations,
  • Justifying their inertia through a range of “reasonable reasons” and “elaborate stories” about how it’s “not their fault” or it’s not “up to them” to make any change.
  • Simply denying their current consequences, or the importance of needing to take positive actions, and make changes.
  • Unmotivated, lack any desire for control, or have the personal power to affect change in their situation.

Initiating Taking Personal Responsibility

To accept and share responsibility starts with being bravely willing to courageously connect with our whole selves and consciously stepping back to hit our internal pause button, retreat into silence and stillness, and compassionately ask:

  1. What happened?
  2. What can I/we learn from it?
  3. What can I/we then do to create it?

Taking personal responsibility becomes a compassionate, creative, and courageous exercise in continuous learning, self-awareness, and emotional self-regulation in ways that safely disrupt people’s defensiveness and awaken them to the possibility of being personally powerful in tough situations.

It is also the basis for taking intelligent actions catalyze and cause positive outcomes, that deliver real solutions to crises, complex situations, and difficult business problems.

This is the first in a series of three blogs on the theme of taking responsibility – going back to leadership basics.

Find out more about our work at ImagineNation™

Find out about our learning products and tools, including The Coach for Innovators, Leaders, and Teams Certified Program, a collaborative, intimate, and deeply personalized innovation coaching and learning program, supported by a global group of peers over 9-weeks, starting Tuesday, October 18, 2022. It is a blended and transformational change and learning program that will give you a deep understanding of the language, principles, and applications of an ecosystem focus,  human-centric approach, and emergent structure (Theory U) to innovation, and upskill people and teams and develop their future fitness, within your unique context. Find out more about our products and tools.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration in Inclusive Design

Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration in Inclusive Design

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s rapidly evolving world, the need for inclusive design is more pressing than ever. Inclusive design ensures that products, environments, and services are accessible and usable by as many people as possible. It is a philosophy that goes beyond accessibility, focusing on user diversity and varying perspectives.

Cross-disciplinary collaboration is pivotal to inclusive design. By involving diverse disciplines, teams can leverage a broad range of insights and expertise to create solutions that are truly inclusive. This approach brings together different viewpoints, fostering an innovative environment where creative solutions can thrive.

Case Study 1: OXO Good Grips

One exemplary model of cross-disciplinary collaboration in inclusive design is OXO’s Good Grips line of kitchen tools. Initially inspired by a need for user-friendly kitchen tools that cater to people with arthritis, OXO’s design team incorporated professionals from various fields such as industrial design, occupational therapy, and market research.

The collaboration began with direct user input and testing, where users with arthritis provided first-hand insights into their struggles with traditional kitchen tools. The occupational therapists in the team translated these struggles into functional requirements, ensuring ease of use and ergonomic comfort.

Industrial designers brought creativity and technical knowledge to the table, developing prototypes and testing materials that were both durable and comfortable. This cross-disciplinary approach led to the creation of Good Grips tools, which feature larger, cushioned handles that are comfortable for all users, not just those with arthritis.

Case Study 2: Microsoft Inclusive Design Toolkit

Microsoft has long been a champion of inclusive design, developing tools and frameworks that guide cross-disciplinary teams in creating accessible technology. A pivotal example is their Inclusive Design Toolkit, which integrates insights from various fields, including psychology, technology, and user research.

The toolkit’s creation involved collaboration between engineers, designers, and psychologists, ensuring a well-rounded understanding of user needs. Psychologists helped identify cognitive and behavioral patterns among diverse user groups, while engineers and designers developed solutions that accommodated these findings.

Through continuous testing and improvement, facilitated by insights from users with disabilities, Microsoft was able to implement features such as adaptive controllers and voice recognition technologies. This cross-disciplinary effort culminated in products that not only serve users with disabilities but enhance the experience for all users.

Conclusion

These case studies underscore the transformative potential of cross-disciplinary collaboration in inclusive design. By merging expertise from different fields, organizations can foster innovation and creativity, ultimately leading to products that embrace user diversity.

As we move forward, it is imperative to continue championing cross-disciplinary collaboration in design processes. Only then can we create a more inclusive world, where every user, regardless of their abilities or background, can participate fully. Let’s commit to embedding inclusion at the heart of innovation, leveraging diverse perspectives to build solutions that empower all.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Need for a Dignity Economy

The Need for a Dignity Economy

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

Every era has its own ideology that creates assumptions and drives actions. At the turn of the century, titans like J.P. Morgan believed that monopolized industries provided stability against the disruptive influence of competition. More recently, the end of the Cold War was supposed to usher in a new era of capitalism and democracy.

It didn’t work out that way. Instead we got oligarchy, authoritarian populism and we lost trust in the institutions that used to govern our society. In America, even competitive capitalism has been greatly weakened. We believed that we could leave everything up to market and technological forces, but they failed us.

Today, we are in the midst of a set of profound generational shifts that will rapidly transform our society over the next decade. As we have throughout history, we will need to own up to our past mistakes and chart a new course. That will mean focusing less on technocratic solutions and more on building a culture rooted in basic dignity and respect.

The Rise Of Merit

In 1940, James Conant, the President of Harvard, gave a talk at the University of California that was soon republished in The Atlantic magazine. Entitled, “Education for a Classless Society,” it advocated for the idea of social mobility based on merit, rather than privilege being handed down through inheritance.

To support this ambition, Conant championed the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) to help identify talented students for scholarships to Harvard. His hope, largely realized, was that other schools would follow suit and education in America would become a sorting mechanism, choosing men (at the time, it was largely white men) to receive advanced professional training.

Today, we have so thoroughly internalized Conant’s ideal that it’s hard to imagine that things could ever have been any different. College has largely become a prerequisite to a successful career and getting more kids to go to college is a top priority. The federal government spends about $80 billion on higher education programs, but less than $2 billion for vocational training.

As Michael Sandel points out in The Tyranny of Merit, this sorting system has had an insidious effect on our culture. Those who are deemed worthy get all the benefits that society has to offer. Those that are not, are not only left behind, but are seen as “takers” rather than “makers” and therefore undeserving of even basic things like access to health and child care.

Applying An Engineering Mindset

Once you accept the premise of meritocracy, the next logical step would be to optimize for meritocratic traits. We could, following the path James Conant established, develop a series of standardized tests to identify and reward our best students. And why stop there? Why not rate our teachers by their ability to produce students who get the best scores.

We can then extend that approach to all spheres of society. How should we best evaluate and manage the performance of an enterprise? Focus on shareholder value. How are we progressing as a society? Simply look at the GDP and job growth numbers and you should have a pretty good idea. What about countries that are falling behind? Well, just develop a standard reform package and then paint by numbers!

Eventually a clear doctrine emerged: A technocratic elite identifies a minimal number of key performance indicators and then, applying rigorous analytical techniques, devises a strategy to optimize based on those metrics. As the technocrats learn, they begin to build systems to increase efficiency and, eventually, those systems become encoded in algorithms.

This engineering mindset has prevailed for more than a generation and it has failed us. Except for a small slice of society, we’ve become poorer, sicker and more vulnerable. Our markets have weakened. We pay more and get less. We’re not only less happy, anxiety and depression have risen to epidemic levels.

Yet perhaps the most insidious effect of meritocracy and the engineering mindset is how we treat each other. If we believe that we have been anointed, through our talent and effort, for better things, we feel emboldened to consider our fellow citizens as something less than ourselves, which breeds not only inequality, but resentment and mistrust.

Holding Ourselves Accountable

In just one month in 1989, the world saw both the fall of the Berlin Wall and the emergence of the World Wide Web, both of which unleashed enormous enthusiasm and opportunity. We thought we were entering a new era in which democracy, free markets and technology would bring about a better world. We were wrong.

It wasn’t all a mirage. There were genuine accomplishments. I lived in post-communist countries in Eastern Europe for 15 years and the progress made was truly amazing. Miracle cures like cancer immunotherapy have saved millions of lives. The Internet has made it possible for an ordinary teenager today to have better access to information than a professional researcher at a major institution did a generation ago. Those are all great things.

Yet we are, in so many ways, worse off than we were 30 years ago. Productivity growth has been depressed, except for a short uptick from 1996-2004. Despite medical breakthroughs, life expectancy in the US has been declining. Markets are less free and less competitive. Poland and Hungary, previous models of democratic reform, have backslid. Even social mobility in the US, the entire aim or the meritocratic project, has been significantly diminished.

It’s time to hold ourselves accountable and chart a new course. Organizations are more than simple units of production. They are workplaces and members of communities. People are far more than economic inputs that can be reduced to resumes and statistics, but human beings worthy of dignity and respect.

People as Ends in Themselves

One of the things I learned managing companies is how much more effective you can be if you assume that everybody wants to do a good job. It makes it possible to waste less time engineering incentives or enforcing rules and focus more on helping everybody actualize their potential. When you encounter the occasional bad apple, it’s not hard to fire them.

In much the same way, we need to learn to focus less on quantifiable signs of merit and more on dignity by treating people as ends in themselves rather than means to an end. Once you do that, it becomes obvious that everybody needs access to health care, that every child should be educated and that everybody deserves to feel safe in their community and in their home.

After all, who says that an anesthesiologist is more worthy than a hospice worker. Or that someone who makes a million dollars a year selling enterprise software makes a greater contribution to society than someone who works in a grocery store during a pandemic. Remuneration simply cannot be the only measure of value.

In the final analysis, ideology should serve people, not the other way around. The success of a society needs to be measured by the well-being of those who live in it. If we increase GDP, but our air and water are more polluted, our children less educated, we live unhappy lives and die deaths of despair, what have we really gained?

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Emotional Well-being as a Pillar of Employee Experience

Emotional Well-being as a Pillar of Employee Experience

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the ever-evolving landscape of work, organizations are increasingly recognizing that fostering a positive employee experience is crucial. Traditionally, companies focused on tangible benefits like compensation and office perks. However, it is becoming clearer that emotional well-being is fundamental to a holistic employee experience. As a thought leader in change and innovation, I am committed to exploring how organizations can integrate emotional well-being into their core strategies for sustainable growth and employee satisfaction.

The Importance of Emotional Well-being

Emotional well-being refers to an individual’s ability to manage and express emotions healthily. In the workplace, it impacts productivity, creativity, and overall job satisfaction. Employees who feel emotionally supported are more engaged, motivated, and loyal. Thus, emotional well-being is not just a benefit but a strategic pillar in crafting an exceptional employee experience.

Case Study #1: Google’s Comprehensive Mental Health Program

Google, known for its pioneering employee policies, has been at the forefront of integrating emotional well-being into the employee experience. The company recognized that stress and mental health issues were affecting productivity and employee satisfaction.

Google’s approach includes a comprehensive mental health program that offers resources such as counseling services, stress management workshops, and meditation classes. They also provide tools and platforms for ongoing peer support.

The results have been impressive. Google reports increased employee retention and engagement scores, along with a noticeable decrease in burnout-related issues. The company’s success underscores the importance of addressing emotional well-being proactively.

Case Study #2: Salesforce’s Ohana Culture

Salesforce has adopted the Hawaiian concept of “Ohana,” meaning family, to craft a nurturing and supportive workplace environment. This culture emphasizes empathy, mutual support, and open communication as central to the employee experience.

Salesforce’s initiatives include offering personalized mental health resources such as therapy sessions and wellness reimbursements. They also conduct regular mental health surveys to tailor support to employee needs effectively.

By treating employees like family, Salesforce has achieved remarkable results. Employee satisfaction scores are high, and the company has become recognized as one of the best places to work globally. Salesforce’s approach highlights how cultural integration of emotional well-being can lead to profound organizational benefits.

Integrating Emotional Well-being into Organizational Strategy

To successfully integrate emotional well-being into the employee experience, organizations must move beyond traditional benefits and adopt a holistic approach:

  1. Leadership Commitment: Senior leaders must champion emotional well-being initiatives, demonstrating commitment from the top levels of management.
  2. Tailored Programs: Programs should be adaptable to meet diverse employee needs, considering varying cultural and personal backgrounds.
  3. Open Communication: Encourage open dialogue about mental health to de-stigmatize these discussions and foster a supportive environment.
  4. Continuous Feedback: Regularly solicit employee feedback to adapt and improve emotional well-being initiatives.

Conclusion

As organizations strive to innovate and remain competitive, embedding emotional well-being into the employee experience is not merely an option but a necessity. The insights from Google and Salesforce demonstrate that when employees feel emotionally supported, companies benefit in terms of productivity, retention, and reputation.

Empowering employees to thrive emotionally creates a ripple effect that enhances business performance and contributes to a more humane and sustainable workplace culture. By prioritizing emotional well-being, companies can build a workforce that is not only successful but truly fulfilled.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.