Tag Archives: airbnb

Why CIOs Should Co-Lead Customer Experience

GUEST POST from Howard Tiersky

Forrester recently gathered top Customer Experience (CX) professionals from around the world for the Forrester CX Forum in New York. For the uninitiated, CX is the discipline of defining the step-by-step customer journey from marketing through sales and service. It defines the key capabilities, content, and interfaces that need to be present at each customer touchpoint and how those touchpoints work together to form a cohesive experience.

At the conference, extensive data was presented to support the argument that delivering a seamless customer experience is more important than ever. In fact, it’s the primary way digital disruptors, like Uber and Amazon, are taking share from more traditional brands.

Forrester found that from 2011 to 2015, revenues for companies that scored near the top of the Forrester CX Index™ outgrew that from a group of companies who scored poorly (CX laggards in Forrester’s terminology) by more than five to one.

But who is actually in charge of CX, and who should be? Many CIOs classically would respond that these types of matters―the design of the website, its features, and generally how we interact with the customer―is the responsibility of marketing or other areas of “the business.” Once “business” decides what they want, IT will build and support it – that’s the breakdown of responsibilities. For the CIO, this may seem to be the most efficient arrangement, as they have plenty to worry about and sometimes it’s nice to be able to identify something they don’t have to focus on.

But in testing this classic mindset through conversations with many of the CX experts at the Forrester Summit, I heard a strong, unanimous dissent with this traditional view. The view of the CX community is that to deliver great results in customer experience, senior IT leadership must be intensively involved in the full CX lifecycle, not merely a recipient of requirements when it’s time to write some code, and not merely kept apprised in an “FYI” type fashion. For example, Ori Soen, General Manager of Medallia Digital, a leading provider of CX software, offered, “We clearly see that when CIOs and their IT teams are customer-centric and focused on CX, the organization is able to generate much better business outcomes from its CX investment.”

These experts point to successful CX companies, such as Google, Facebook, and Airbnb, where the development teams and business teams are working as one unit, making decisions about the experience, and implementing it together.

As Daniel Davenport, Managing Director of Liquid Hub, an agency that focuses on customer engagement, articulated, “I think it is important for the CIO to have a voice at the table and co-create the ultimate solution.”

But as busy as enterprise CIOs and their key lieutenants are, I pressed the CX experts at the Forrester Forum as to exactly why it’s truly essential that the CIO be so aggressively involved in CX and what the specific areas of value are. After speaking with some CX professionals, I derived five key areas of significant value that are derived from CIO involvement in the CX process.

1. Art of the Possible

CX innovation sits at the intersection of customer need and the ever-changing landscape of what is technically possible. It’s too abstract for CX professionals to define requirements and ask IT to figure out how to make them work if the CX teams don’t have a good sense of what they have to work with. New technologies from Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Virtual Reality to In-memory computing make it possible to do things today that were impractical just a year or two ago. But IT can’t be expected to “brief” CX professionals on every technology in the world. Instead, the process needs to be a collaboration of those studying what customers need and those studying what technology is newly enabling so that they can pool their knowledge and find new intersections where value can be created for the customer and the company. That only happens when IT is intimately involved in the ongoing process of considering the next generation CX.

2. Understanding Level of Effort and Dependencies for Prioritization and Planning

In an enterprise, there are typically many systems and many simultaneous programs going on that impact what can be implemented, when it can be implemented and with what level of effort. CX teams need to be constantly considering how their visions intersect with the technical reality of enterprise IT to develop CX roadmaps that aggressively bring new capabilities to market, but don’t crash headlong into other initiatives, system upgrades, or compliance issues.

Furthermore, CX design requires the continuous balancing of the customer’s optimal experience and various business considerations, including the cost of implementing new capabilities and the cost of supporting them. A significant component of these cost factors is IT. Therefore, there is a constant and ongoing need to both understand from IT what the level of effort might be for any given enhancement, and perhaps even more importantly, IT should be a creative collaborator in thinking about how to optimize technical approaches so that great CX ideas can be implemented with a sensible value equation. To do this effectively, IT can’t just “cost out” requirements provided by the business, but needs to be “on the inside” to understand what is really trying to be accomplished. Sometimes the answer that works economically relies on a different set of requirements than that which was initially envisioned, and an engaged senior IT partner can get creative with their colleagues to search for the best value equation.

3. Measuring CX

Measurement is a huge component of CX. The goal of CX is to move the customer through a journey from awareness to consideration to purchase to advocacy and loyalty. Many discreet components make up this journey across various touchpoints: the emails sent to customers, individual features of an app, the information available to call center representatives, and the way returns are handled. The constant obsession of CX professionals is, “How do we make this process better so the customer is more delighted and the business outcome is even more robust?” But to do so, it is essential to constantly measure the impact of each individual component of the customer’s mindset and behavior. Measuring these many interactions is often complex because it requires collecting data across many different touchpoints and then being able to correlate it so as to figure out the puzzle of causality. That requires understanding enterprise data and how to connect it across very diverse systems ― an expertise that IT needs to bring to the table.

In addition to the enterprise systems themselves, there are many excellent and deeply technical tools that support the CX measurement process. CIOs need to be deeply involved in these systems just as they would in finance or HR systems. I spoke with David McBride, a CX expert and Director of Product Management at IBM who argued, “CIOs have long been focused on creating technology to help businesses operate; when they participate in the CX process, they get to see data or even videos of customers and how they may be struggling to move through the current customer journey.” IBM’s Behavioral Analytics tool (formerly known as Tealeaf), for example, offers tools that record user sessions for analytical purposes. McBride notes, “There is nothing like seeing a session replayed to illustrate the extent of a particular struggle.”

4. True End-to-End Perspective

Lastly, in enterprises very often there isn’t just one CX initiative, but many, focused on different products, channels, touchpoints, or customer segments. The office of the CIO can often make sure that the ultimate customer experience is achieved by making sure that there is cohesion to both the technology and also the management of data across these different initiatives.

I spoke with Angela Wells, Senior Director, CX at Oracle about this, “At Oracle, what we have seen is that the CIO can and should be essential to CX decisions. What has happened at a lot of bigger companies is that they have made many ‘one-off’ decisions about what they thought were best-in-breed solutions in separate [areas of the business], and then the data didn’t talk to each other. It all got pretty sporadic and expensive, and it didn’t really deliver the customer experience [desired]. So, what we have found is that CIOs have become a centralized source for thinking about what’s going to happen to that data. They are thinking more of an umbrella; what’s best for the whole company, not just what’s best for my little niche?”

As small steps in customer experience grow into a larger program, you run the risk of chaos if there isn’t someone with the broader perspective. Dimitry Grenader, VP Product Marketing at Luminoso, a leading player in the AI arena, expressed this passionately, “In this day and age, CX should not just be left to marketers. Software is eating the world, and being able to put together the right platform will ultimately determine the success or failure of the efforts. Everything in today’s world starts as a feature, then becomes a product, which in turn becomes a platform, and finally becomes the operating system. If you don’t have the right operating system, you are building a castle on the sand.”

“I believe that a CIO must at the very least be a strong stakeholder, if not the driver of the CX process.”

Oracle’s Wells summed up this shift in terms of the evolving role of the CIO in our new digitally transformed world, “If you are thinking of the CIO as that straight tech-minded person, you are going to miss out on that more modern CIO that is a Chief Innovation Officer who takes responsibility to figure out how we make the most of what we are spending on technology to deliver the best customer experience.”

5. Changing the Way IT Operates

Finally, the level of transformation required to enable enterprises to deliver on their customer’s digital expectations may require a significant transformation in many facets of how IT operates, so it’s important for the CIO to deeply understand this difference.

As Forrester Vice President and Research Group Director Sharyn Leaver summed it up, “Compelling experiences, delivered digitally, separate CX winners from laggards. Firms that lead their industries to customer experience aggressively embrace business technologies to help win, serve, and retain customers — and they do so at rapid pace. This requires intense involvement from CIOs and their teams. Not at an arm’s length. But through ongoing collaboration and innovation.

“CX brings new prominence to technology’s role, but also new pressures on CIOs. The pervasive need for digital experiences exposes old systems, static organizations, and especially outmoded cultures that cannot deliver at the speed of the customer. For the CIO, this is much more daunting than merely spinning up a digital or mobile team. For many, success will require an overhaul of their organization – the people, processes, governance, and technology itself.”

This article originally appeared on the Howard Tiersky blog

Image Credits: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

False Choice – Founder versus Manager

1 Reply

False Choice - Founder versus Manager

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

Paul Graham, cofounder of Y Combinator, was so inspired by a speech by Airbnb cofounder and CEO that he wrote an essay about well-intentioned advice that, to scale a business, founders must shift modes and become managers.

It went viral.

In the essay, he argued that:

In effect there are two different ways to run a company: founder mode and manager mode. Till now most people even in Silicon Valley have implicitly assumed that scaling a startup meant switching to manager mode. But we can infer the existence of another mode from the dismay of founders who’ve tried it, and the success of their attempts to escape from it.

With curiosity and an open mind, I read on.

I finished with a deep sigh and an eye roll.

This is why.

Manager Mode: The realm of liars and professional fakers

On the off chance that you thought Graham’s essay would be a balanced and reflective examination of management styles in different corporate contexts, his description of Manager Mode should relieve you of that thought:

The way managers are taught to run companies seems to be like modular design in the sense that you treat subtrees of the org chart as black boxes. You tell your direct reports what to do, and it’s up to them to figure out how. But you don’t get involved in the details of what they do. That would be micromanaging them, which is bad.

Hire good people and give them room to do their jobs. Sounds great when it’s described that way, doesn’t it? Except in practice, judging from the report of founder after founder, what this often turns out to mean is: hire professional fakers and let them drive the company into the ground.

Later, he writes about how founders are gaslit into adopting Manager Mode from every angle, including by “VCs who haven’t been founders themselves don’t know how founders should run companies, and C-level execs, as a class, include some of the most skillful liars in the world.”

Founder Mode: A meritocracy of lifelong learners

For Graham, Founder Mode boils down to two things:

Sweating the details
Engaging with employees throughout the organization beyond just direct reports. He cites Steve Jobs’ practice of holding “an annual retreat for what he considered the 100 most important people at Apple, and these were not the 100 people highest on the org chart.”

To his credit, Graham acknowledges that getting involved in the details is micromanaging, “which is bad,” and that delegation is required because “founders can’t keep running a 2000 person company the way they ran it when it had 20.” A week later, he acknowledged that female founders “don’t have permission to run their companies in Founder Mode the same way men can.”

Yet he persists in believing that Founder, not Manager, Mode is critical to success,

“Look at what founders have achieved already, and yet they’ve achieved this against a headwind of bad advice. Imagine what they’ll do once we can tell them how to run their companies like Steve Jobs instead of John Sculley.”

Leader Mode: Manager Mode + Founder Mode

The essay is interesting, but I have real issues with two of his key points:

Professional managers are disconnected from the people and businesses they manage, and as a result, their practices and behaviors are inconsistent with startup success.
Founders should ignore conventional wisdom and micromanage to their heart’s content.

Most “professional managers” I’ve met are deeply connected to the people they manage, committed to the businesses they operate, and act with integrity and authenticity. They are a far cry from the “professional fakers” and “skillful liars” Graham describes.

Most founders I’ve met should not be allowed near the details once they have a team in place. Their meddling, need for control, and soul-crushing FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) lead to chaos, burnout, and failure.

The truth is, it’s contextual. The leaders I know switch between Founder and Manager mode based on the context. They work with the passion of founders, trust with the confidence of managers, and are smart and humble enough to accept feedback when they go too far in one direction or the other.

Being both manager and founder isn’t just the essence of being a leader. It’s the essence of being a successful corporate innovator. You are a founder, investing in, advocating for, and sweating the details of ambiguous and risky work. And you are a manager navigating the economic, operational, and political minefields that govern the core business and fund your paycheck and your team.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Software Isn’t Going to Eat the World

Leave a reply

Software Isn't Going to Eat the World

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

In 2011, technology pioneer Marc Andreessen declared that software is eating the world. “With lower start-up costs and a vastly expanded market for online services,” he wrote, “the result is a global economy that for the first time will be fully digitally wired — the dream of every cyber-visionary of the early 1990s, finally delivered, a full generation later.

Yet as Derek Thompson recently pointed out in The Atlantic, the euphoria of Andreessen and his Silicon Valley brethren seems to have been misplaced. Former unicorns like Uber, Lyft, and Peloton have seen their value crash, while WeWork saw its IPO self-destruct. Hardly “the dream of every cyber-visionary.”

The truth is that we still live in a world of atoms, not bits and most of the value is created by making things we live in, wear, eat and ride in. For all of the tech world’s astounding success, it still makes up only a small fraction of the overall economy. So, taking a software centric view, while it has served Silicon Valley well in the past, may be its Achilles heel in the future.

The Silicon Valley Myth

The Silicon Valley way of doing business got its start in 1968, when an investor named Arthur Rock backed executives from Fairchild Semiconductor to start a new company, which would become known as Intel. Unlike back east, where businesses depended on stodgy banks for finance, on the west coast venture capitalists, many of whom were former engineers themselves, would decide which technology companies got funded.

Over the years, a virtuous cycle ensued. Successful tech companies created fabulously wealthy entrepreneurs and executives, who would in turn invest in new ventures. Things shifted into hyperdrive when the company Andreessen founded, Netscape, quadrupled its value on its first day of trading, kicking off the dotcom boom.

While the dotcom bubble would crash in 2000, it wasn’t all based on pixie dust. As the economist W. Brian Arthur explained in Harvard Business Review, while traditional industrial companies were subject to diminishing returns, software companies with negligible marginal costs could achieve increasing returns powered by network effects.

Yet even as real value was being created and fabulous new technology businesses prospered, an underlying myth began to take hold. Rather than treating software business as a special case, many came to believe that the Silicon Valley model could be applied to any business. In other words, that software would eat the world.

The Productivity Paradox (Redux)

One reason that so many outside of Silicon Valley were skeptical of the technology boom for a long time was a longstanding productivity paradox. Although throughout the 1970s and 80s, business investment in computer technology was increasing by more than 20% per year, productivity growth had diminished during the same period.

In the late 90s, however, this trend reversed itself and productivity began to soar. It seemed that Andreessen and his fellow “cyber-visionaries were redeemed. No longer considered outcasts, they became the darlings of corporate America. It appeared that a new day was dawning and the Silicon Valley ethos took hold.

While the dotcom crash deflated the bubble in 2000, the Silicon Valley machine was soon rolling again. Web 2.0 unleashed the social web, smartphones initiated the mobile era and then IBM’s Watson’s defeat of human champions on the game show Jeopardy! heralded a new age of artificial intelligence.

Yet still, we find ourselves in a new productivity paradox. By 2005, productivity growth had disappeared once again and has remained diminished ever since. To paraphrase economist Robert Solow, we see software everywhere except in the productivity statistics.

The Platform Fallacy

Today, pundits are touting a new rosy scenario. They point out that Uber, the world’s largest taxi company, owns no vehicles. Airbnb, the largest accommodation provider, owns no real estate. Facebook, the most popular media owner, creates no content and so on. The implicit assumption is that it is better to build software that makes matches than to invest in assets.

Yet platform-based businesses have three inherent weaknesses that aren’t always immediately obvious. First, they lack barriers to entry, which makes it difficult to create a sustainable competitive advantage. Second, they tend to create “winner-take-all” markets so for every fabulous success like Facebook, you can have thousands of failures. Finally, rabid competition leads to high costs.

The most important thing to understand about platforms is that they give us access to ecosystems of talent, technology and information and it is in those ecosystems where the greatest potential for value creation lies. That’s why, to become profitable, platform businesses eventually need to invest in real assets.

Consider Amazon: Almost two thirds of Amazon’s profits come from its cloud computing unit, AWS, which provides computing infrastructure for other organizations. More recently, it bought Whole Foods and began opening Amazon Go retail stores. The more that you look, Amazon looks less like a platform and more like a traditional pipeline business.

Reimagining Innovation for a World of Atoms

The truth is that the digital revolution, for all of the excitement and nifty gadgets it has produced, has been somewhat of a disappointment. Since personal computers first became available in the 1970’s we’ve had less than ten years of elevated productivity growth. Compare that to the 50-year boom in productivity created in the wake of electricity and internal combustion and it’s clear that digital technology falls short.

In a sense though, the lack of impact shouldn’t be that surprising. Even at this late stage, information and communication technologies only make up for about 6% of GDP in advanced economies. Clearly, that’s not enough to swallow the world. As we have seen, it’s barely enough to make a dent.

Yet still, there is great potential in the other 94% of the economy and there may be brighter days ahead in using computing technology to drive advancement in the physical world. Exciting new fields, such as synthetic biology and materials science may very well revolutionize industries like manufacturing, healthcare, energy and agriculture.

So, we are now likely embarking on a new era of innovation that will be very different than the digital age. Rather than focused on one technology, concentrated in one geographical area and dominated by a handful of industry giants, it will be widely dispersed and made up of a diverse group of interlocking ecosystems of talent, technology and information.

Make no mistake. The future will not be digital. Instead, we will need to learn how to integrate a diverse set of technologies to reimagine atoms in the physical world.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Incorporating User Feedback into Iterative Design

Leave a reply

Incorporating User Feedback into Iterative Design

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the realm of human-centered design, the influence of user feedback cannot be overstated. User feedback offers a compass that guides designers through the iterative design process, ensuring that products not only meet but exceed the needs and expectations of users. This article delves into the principles of incorporating user feedback into iterative design and provides real-world case studies to illuminate these principles in action.

Understanding Iterative Design

Iterative design is a cyclic process involving the continual refinement of a product through repeated cycles of prototyping, testing, and evaluation. The goal is to progressively enhance design decisions with each iteration, informed directly by user insights. Integrating user feedback into this loop ensures that designs are grounded in real-world usability and relevance.

The Critical Role of User Feedback

User feedback is the lifeblood of iterative design. It transforms subjective opinions into objective data, enabling designers to make informed decisions. By actively listening to users, designers can uncover unmet needs, identify points of friction, and discover opportunities for innovation.

Best Practices for Gathering User Feedback

Engage Early and Often: Involve users from the conceptual stage and maintain this interaction throughout the design process.
Diverse User Base: Ensure feedback from a wide demographic to capture diverse perspectives and needs.
Utilize Multiple Channels: Collect feedback through surveys, interviews, usability testing, and analytics to gather a comprehensive understanding.
Iterative Testing: Conduct frequent testing on prototypes to gather timely insights and adapt quickly.

Case Study 1: Airbnb

Revolutionizing Booking with User Insights

Airbnb, an industry leader in hospitality, exemplifies the power of user feedback in iterative design. Initially, Airbnb faced challenges with user booking processes and trust issues among the community.

To address these challenges, Airbnb conducted extensive user interviews and testing sessions. Feedback highlighted confusion around the booking interface and skepticism regarding property legitimacy and safety.

Based on these insights, Airbnb iterated on their design. They simplified the booking process by implementing a straightforward and transparent user interface. User profiles and reviews were made more prominent, improving trustworthiness through verified reviews and host information.

The result was a significant increase in user engagement and bookings, showcasing how targeted iterative design enhancements rooted in user feedback can lead to substantial business growth.

Case Study 2: Dropbox

Streamlining File Sharing with Continuous Feedback

Dropbox, a pioneer in cloud storage, faced challenges in its early stages with its file synchronization features. Initial users reported difficulties with the interface and inconsistent synchronization.

Dropbox’s response was to adopt an iterative design process heavily reliant on user feedback. They invited a broad user group to engage with beta versions, encouraging honest feedback and suggestions.

Through this feedback, Dropbox identified specific areas for improvement, such as the need for clearer file status indicators and more reliable background synchronization. Iterative testing and design adjustments addressed these concerns, enhancing overall user satisfaction and experience.

This consistent feedback loop not only improved the functionality but also cemented Dropbox’s reputation for reliability and ease-of-use, leading to increased adoption and user retention.

Conclusion

Incorporating user feedback into iterative design is not merely an option but a necessity for creating products that truly resonate with users. As demonstrated through the success stories of Airbnb and Dropbox, continually engaging with users and adapting designs accordingly can unlock new levels of innovation and success.

By understanding user feedback’s critical role, adopting best practices for its integration, and learning from successful case studies, businesses can refine their design processes to cultivate products that deliver exceptional user experiences and sustainable growth.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovative Strategies for Crisis Management

Leave a reply

Innovative Strategies for Crisis Management

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s rapidly changing landscape, organizations must be equipped with effective strategies for crisis management. The ability to navigate a crisis not only determines the survival of a company but can also set the foundation for future success. Innovative thinking becomes crucial here. Let’s explore some key strategies and real-world examples of organizations that have excelled in crisis management.

Strategy 1: Embrace Agility

An agile approach allows organizations to respond quickly and efficiently to crises. This involves having flexible processes and empowering teams to make swift decisions. A culture of agility encourages constant evaluation and immediate action, which can significantly reduce the impact of unforeseen challenges.

Case Study: Airbnb’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, Airbnb experienced a major crisis as travel restrictions meant a significant drop in bookings. Instead of succumbing to the challenges, Airbnb embraced agility by pivoting their business model:

They introduced online experiences as a way to engage their community and support hosts. This strategic move not only provided a new revenue stream but also strengthened their brand by showing resilience and adaptability.

Strategy 2: Foster Transparent Communication

During a crisis, transparent and consistent communication is vital to maintaining trust among stakeholders. Organizations should aim to provide accurate information and manage expectations effectively. Clear communication minimizes panic and keeps all parties aligned.

Case Study: Johnson & Johnson’s Handling of the 1982 Tylenol Crisis

In 1982, Johnson & Johnson faced a severe crisis when their Tylenol products were tampered with, leading to consumer deaths. Their handling of the situation stands as a textbook example of crisis management:

They immediately launched a massive communications campaign to inform the public and recalled 31 million bottles of Tylenol, prioritizing customer safety above all. The bold and transparent approach not only mitigated the crisis but also restored public trust.

Strategy 3: Leverage Technology

Utilizing technology can offer innovative solutions during a crisis. Technology can facilitate real-time data analysis, communication, and the automation of processes—allowing organizations to respond swiftly and effectively.

Build a Resilient Community

Involving and supporting the community around your organization can serve as a strong foundation during a crisis. A resilient community stands together, helping not only the organization recover but also supporting each other through challenges.

Conclusion

Crisis management requires a balance of agility, communication, and technological innovation. By studying successful case studies like Airbnb and Johnson & Johnson, we learn the value of proactive strategies that prioritize flexibility, transparency, and community engagement. These elements are crucial to overcoming crises and setting a course for sustainable success.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

From Concept to Creation: A Guide to Ideation

Leave a reply

From Concept to Creation: A Guide to Ideation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the ever-evolving landscape of innovation, transitioning from a broad concept to a tangible creation can often be the most challenging yet rewarding journey an organization can undertake. Ideation, the creative process of generating, developing, and communicating new concepts, is a cornerstone of this journey. As a thought leader in human-centered change and innovation, it’s my pleasure to guide you through the critical stages of ideation using two compelling case studies as illustrations.

The Ideation Process

The ideation process involves several key stages: inspiration, creative generation, refinement, prototyping, and execution. Each phase is crucial, requiring both structured methodologies and a flexible mindset. Successful ideation fosters a culture of creativity and openness, leveraging diverse perspectives to develop solutions that resonate with real human needs.

Case Study 1: Airbnb – Revolutionizing Travel Accommodation

Inspiration:

The founders of Airbnb, Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia, were struggling to pay rent in San Francisco in 2007. They saw an opportunity during a local design conference, when hotels were fully booked. This sparked the idea of renting out air mattresses in their apartment to attendees looking for affordable accommodation.

Creative Generation:

The idea expanded beyond their immediate need. Chesky and Gebbia, alongside Nathan Blecharczyk, envisioned a platform where homeowners could list and rent spaces globally. This was revolutionary, challenging the traditional hotel industry.

Refinement and Prototyping:

Initial website versions were simple, but enough to validate the concept through real users. Continuous feedback helped refine the platform to better match user needs, laying the foundation for what Airbnb is today.

Execution:

Airbnb launched officially in 2008 and has since grown exponentially, leveraging lessons learned from user feedback and scaling the model to accommodate millions of users worldwide.

Case Study 2: The Dyson Vacuum Cleaner – Engineering Innovation

Inspiration:

James Dyson, frustrated with the inefficiency of traditional vacuum cleaners, sought out a solution. Noticing the industrial cyclone separators used in sawmills inspired him to apply similar technology to home vacuuming.

Creative Generation:

The concept of a bagless vacuum cleaner took shape. Dyson’s vision was to create a powerful vacuum that maintained its suction, unlike traditional models losing power as bags filled.

Refinement and Prototyping:

Dyson created over 5,000 prototypes over five years, iterating designs based on performance and user input. This relentless refinement was driven by his commitment to solving a real problem.

Execution:

The Dyson DC01 launched in 1993 and revolutionized the market. Its success built upon Dyson’s perseverance through ideation stages, ultimately establishing a new standard in home cleaning technology.

Key Takeaways

Both Airbnb and Dyson exemplify the power of effective ideation. Here are a few key takeaways from their journeys:

User-Centric Mindset: Focus on understanding and solving real user problems.
Iterative Prototyping: Test, learn, and refine ideas continuously.
Persistence and Flexibility: Stay committed to your vision, but be flexible enough to adapt based on feedback and new insights.

Conclusion

The journey from concept to creation demands a balance of creativity, strategy, and resilience. By fostering a culture that embraces these qualities, organizations can transform great ideas into groundbreaking innovations. Remember, successful ideation is not just about having a bright idea — it’s about nurturing that idea through each phase of its evolution, just as seen in the transformative journeys of Airbnb and Dyson.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Empathy in Design: Understanding Your Users

Leave a reply

Empathy in Design: Understanding Your Users

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the swiftly changing world of technology and innovation, tapping into the minds and hearts of users has become more crucial than ever. As we strive to create products and services that truly resonate, empathy is our guiding star. Understanding users is about stepping into their world, uncovering their needs, desires, and challenges.

The Power of Empathy in Design

Empathy helps designers move beyond assumptions. It grounds us in reality, urging us to perceive things from the user’s perspective. By understanding how users interact with a product, we can ensure that it not only meets their needs but enhances their experience. Empathy-driven design fosters connection, satisfaction, and ultimately, loyalty.

Case Study 1: Airbnb – Designing for Belonging

Background

Airbnb started with a simple idea: offering a platform for people to rent out spaces in their homes. However, as it grew, the company realized it was about more than just travel accommodations—it was about fostering a sense of belonging.

Approach

Airbnb employed empathy mapping and journey mapping to understand the needs and emotions of their users. They spent time with hosts and guests, listening to their stories and observing their experiences. Through this process, Airbnb discovered that guests wanted more than a place to stay. They sought personal connections and authentic experiences.

Results

By empathizing with users, Airbnb transitioned from a mere booking platform to a community-driven experience provider. Features such as the introduction of Experiences—activities hosted by locals—reflected this deeper understanding. This shift in focus helped Airbnb achieve global success and distinguish itself in a crowded market.

Case Study 2: IDEO and the Design of an Accessible Voting Booth

Background

IDEO, a global design and innovation company, was tasked with redesigning the voting experience to make it accessible to everyone, including disabled and elderly people. The challenge was to create a booth that was easy to use, while ensuring the privacy and security of the vote.

Approach

IDEO researchers immersed themselves in the lives of voters. They involved people with disabilities in the design process, conducted interviews, and tested prototypes in multiple polling locations. The team sought feedback from users to understand their specific impediments and aspirations when voting.

Results

The outcome was a voting booth with a universal design that featured adjustable heights, intuitive layouts, and straightforward instructions. IDEO’s empathetic approach ensured that voting was accessible to all, empowering a segment of society that often faced obstacles in civic participation.

Implementing Empathy in Your Design Processes

Integrating empathy into design processes often involves the following steps:

Empathize with Users: Engage with diverse users to gather insights through interviews, observations, and participatory design.
Define Insights: Synthesize user feedback into actionable insights that capture their needs and desires.
Ideate Solutions: Develop creative solutions that address user challenges, involving them in the brainstorming process.
Prototype and Test: Build prototypes and test them with actual users to understand their experiences and refine designs accordingly.
Implement and Iterate: Launch solutions with room for improvements based on continuous user feedback and evolving empathy.

Conclusion

Empathy in design isn’t merely a process; it’s a mindset. By cultivating a deeper understanding of users, companies can create products that genuinely resonate and drive profound connections. As demonstrated by Airbnb and IDEO, empathetic design leads to solutions that meet real-world needs while building strong, sustainable relationships with users.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Prototyping with Users is a Human-Centered Approach to Testing Ideas

Leave a reply

Prototyping with Users is a Human-Centered Approach to Testing Ideas

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the rapidly evolving landscape of innovation, creating solutions that resonate with users is more crucial than ever. The key to successful innovation is not just creating value but delivering it in a way that meets users’ needs and expectations. This is where human-centered prototyping comes into play. By involving users in the prototyping process, organizations can gather valuable insights, refine their ideas, and ultimately create more meaningful products and services.

Why Human-Centered Prototyping?

Traditional approaches to prototyping often place the design team at the center, focusing on functionality and technical feasibility. However, this can lead to solutions that miss the mark in terms of user experience and desirability. Human-centered prototyping, on the other hand, involves users as co-creators. This approach ensures that prototypes are not only technically sound but also aligned with users’ real-world needs and behaviors.

1. Engaging Users Early and Often

By bringing users into the prototyping phase from the start, organizations can uncover unexpected use cases, validate assumptions, and identify pain points that may not be immediately obvious. Engaging users early helps to build empathy and ensures that the final product is grounded in reality.

2. Rapid Iteration and Feedback Loops

Human-centered prototyping emphasizes rapid iteration. By quickly creating and testing prototypes with users, teams can learn and adapt in real-time. This continuous feedback loop encourages experimentation and reduces the risk of costly failures further down the line.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Airbnb’s Evolution through User Insights

Airbnb’s rise to prominence is a testament to the power of user-centered prototyping. In its early days, the founders faced significant challenges in gaining traction. To address this, they adopted a strategy of directly engaging with their users — both hosts and guests.

By conducting in-person visits and creating low-fidelity prototypes of their platform, Airbnb’s team gathered firsthand insights into the needs and pain points of their users. This process revealed critical aspects, such as the importance of trust and the need for detailed property descriptions and quality photos.

Through continuous iteration based on real user feedback, Airbnb was able to refine their platform, resulting in a user experience that feels both personalized and intuitive. This approach was instrumental in transforming their business model into a globally recognized brand.

Case Study 2: IDEO’s Design Thinking in the Healthcare Sector

IDEO, a leader in applying design thinking to solve complex problems, utilized human-centered prototyping to innovate in the healthcare sector. They partnered with a hospital to improve patient experience in the emergency department.

IDEO’s process involved shadowing medical staff, interviewing patients, and creating role-playing scenarios to simulate the patient journey. By developing storyboards and low-fidelity prototypes, they could quickly test and iterate on different aspects of the experience.

One of the key insights was the importance of communication in alleviating patient anxiety. IDEO’s prototypes included redesigned information boards and communication tools that made processes more transparent and efficient. The result was a significant improvement in patient satisfaction and operational efficiency.

Conclusion

Human-centered prototyping is more than just a method; it’s a mindset that prioritizes empathy, collaboration, and real-world validation. By involving users throughout the prototyping process, organizations can create solutions that are not only innovative but also relevant and impactful.

As we move forward, the organizations that embrace this human-centered approach will be best positioned to navigate the complexities of innovation in the digital age. The lessons from companies like Airbnb and IDEO provide a compelling roadmap for leveraging user insights to drive meaningful change and deliver exceptional products and services.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Understanding Human Needs is the Driver of Successful Design

Leave a reply

Understanding Human Needs is the Driver of Successful Design

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the realm of design and innovation, the ability to understand and respond to human needs is the cornerstone of creating solutions that truly resonate with users. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I’ve had the privilege of exploring and advocating for approaches that prioritize empathy and understanding in the design process. Today, we’re diving into why addressing human needs is the driving force behind successful design and innovation.

The Foundation of Human-Centered Design

Human-centered design (HCD) is not just a methodology; it’s a mindset. At its core, HCD asks, “What do people need?” rather than “What can we make?” This fundamental shift in perspective sets the stage for creating designs that are intuitive, effective, and beloved by their users.

The process typically involves three key phases: Inspiration, Ideation, and Implementation. Throughout these stages, designers focus on empathizing with users, defining their needs, ideating solutions, prototyping, testing, and finally, implementing the best ideas.

“Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works.” – Steve Jobs

Understanding Human Needs in Design

Understanding human needs goes beyond surface-level observations. It involves delving deep into the emotional, psychological, and functional requirements of users. This understanding can be broken down into several categories:

Functional Needs: These are practical requirements. Does the design solve a problem? Is it efficient and effective?
Emotional Needs: Designs must resonate on an emotional level. They should evoke feelings of happiness, security, and satisfaction.
Cultural Needs: Understanding the cultural context of users is crucial. Culture influences how designs are perceived and interacted with.
Social Needs: Consider how designs affect social interactions. Do they facilitate connections or create barriers?

Case Study 1: Airbnb – Designing Trust in Shared Spaces

When Airbnb first introduced the idea of short-term home rentals, the company faced a significant barrier: trust. Why would someone open their home to a stranger or choose to stay in a stranger’s home? The success of Airbnb hinged on addressing this fundamental human need for trust and security.

Airbnb tackled this challenge by implementing multiple trust-building features:

User Profiles and Reviews: Allowing both hosts and guests to create profiles and leave reviews helped build credibility.
Secure Payments: Airbnb introduced a secure payment system that protected both parties.
24/7 Customer Support: Access to constant support built additional layers of trust.

These design choices show a deep understanding of human needs for safety and trust, ensuring the platform’s widespread adoption and success.

Case Study 2: Apple – Intuitive User Experience

Apple Inc. has long been a pioneer in human-centered design. The company’s approach to meeting human needs is encapsulated in their focus on intuitive user experiences. This philosophy has been evident in products like the iPhone, iPad, and Mac.

Key aspects of Apple’s design philosophy include:

Simplicity: Apple’s design transcends complexity, focusing on what users need most without overwhelming them with features.
Seamless Integration: Apple products work together seamlessly, creating a cohesive experience that fosters customer loyalty.
Aesthetic Appeal: Apple understands the emotional need for products that not only work well but look and feel premium.

By deeply understanding the end-user’s needs, Apple continues to craft products that are not just tools but beloved companions in the lives of their users across the globe.

The Future of Human-Centered Design

As technology evolves and the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the principles of human-centered design will only grow in importance. The focus will remain on creating products and solutions that are not only functional but truly enriching and fulfilling for users.

Technological advancements like artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and the Internet of Things will provide designers with even more tools to understand and cater to human needs in nuanced ways. This will lead to innovations that are deeply personal and transformative.

Conclusion

Ultimately, understanding human needs is not just the driver of successful design; it is its very essence. By prioritizing empathy and deeply understanding the intricate tapestry of human experience, designers and innovators can create solutions that are truly impactful. As we continue on this journey of human-centered transformation, let us keep human needs at the forefront of our design aspirations.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of User Research in Creating Inspiring Experiences

Leave a reply

The Role of User Research in Creating Inspiring Experiences

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the rapidly evolving world of business, creating enchanting and inspiring customer experiences often requires organizations to focus deeply on user research. This vital process helps companies understand their customers, engage with their needs, and predict their expectations. But what role does user research play, and how can it be implemented effectively to create remarkable experiences? Let’s delve deeper.

The Essence of User Research

User research is a systematic approach to understanding your audience, their behaviors, preferences, and the contexts in which they engage with your product or service. It involves collecting data through surveys, interviews, observation, and testing, enabling businesses to make informed decisions about product design and strategy.

The insights gained from user research help in creating designs that not only meet customer needs but also exceed their expectations. By embedding the user at the heart of the design process, companies can develop solutions that resonate on an emotional level, promote loyalty, and build brand advocates.

Case Study 1: Airbnb – A Model of User-Centric Innovation

In the competitive landscape of hospitality, Airbnb has emerged as a frontrunner by understanding and prioritizing the user experience. When the founders launched the beta version of their platform, they encountered an unexpected challenge: hosts weren’t showcasing their properties effectively. To overcome this hurdle, Airbnb conducted extensive user research to identify real issues faced by their hosts and guests.

The user research revealed that potential guests were hesitant to book properties due to low-quality photos. With this insight, Airbnb sent professional photographers to capture high-quality images of hosts’ properties. This decision was based entirely on user feedback and led to a dramatic increase in bookings, propelling Airbnb toward exponential growth.

This case study demonstrates the power of user research. By listening to and observing their users, Airbnb disrupted the traditional accommodation industry, proving that customer-inspired innovation leads to superior business performance.

Case Study 2: Zappos – Crafting Delight Through Empathy

Zappos, an online shoe and clothing retailer, understands that user research doesn’t always need to be data-heavy. They adopted an empathetic approach to user experience by training call center representatives to actively listen and resolve customer issues on a personal level.

Instead of focusing solely on metrics like call time, Zappos empowered their representatives to take the time needed to make the customer happy—putting them at odds with many traditional call centers. This decision stemmed from understanding that their customers valued personalized service and emotional connections as much as or more than efficient transactions.

One notable case was when a Zappos representative helped a customer track down a specific shoe from a competitor, simply because Zappos didn’t carry it. These stories have become legendary and have established Zappos as an industry leader in customer service. By prioritizing empathy and understanding over traditional metrics, Zappos creates inspiring experiences that customers love and remember.

The Methodology Behind Effective User Research

Successful user research is not conducted in a vacuum. It involves continuous iterations and adaptations of methods, tools, and practices to align with evolving user needs. Various methods include:

Usability Testing: Observing users as they interact with your product can uncover pain points and barriers to a seamless experience.
Contextual Inquiry: Visiting users in their environment to observe how they naturally interact with a product offers deep insights.
Surveys and Interviews: Direct feedback through structured or semi-structured forms helps to gather quantitative and qualitative data.

What ties all these methodologies together is a commitment to empathy and open-mindedness. It requires design teams to leave their biases behind and truly listen to the user’s voice. This mindset results in insights that drive thoughtful and responsive design, ultimately creating inspiring experiences for the user.

Conclusion

In a world where customer expectations continue to soar to new heights, user research remains an indispensable tool in the quest to deliver inspiring experiences. It allows organizations to translate customer insights into actionable strategies, transforming products and services in ways that anticipate and exceed user desires. With the lessons gleaned from user research, companies like Airbnb and Zappos are exemplars of the transformative power of understanding and prioritizing users.

Moving forward, organizations that strategically integrate user research into their innovation processes will not only foster more loyal customer bases but will also thrive in an environment where customer satisfaction dictates market success. User research is not just an ingredient for competitive advantage; it is a prerequisite for creating the inspiring experiences that define the brands of tomorrow.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.