Tag Archives: psychological safety

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of September 2023

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of September 2023Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are September’s ten most popular innovation posts:

  1. The Malcolm Gladwell Trap — by Greg Satell
  2. Where People Go Wrong with Minimum Viable Products — by Greg Satell
  3. Our People Metrics Are Broken — by Mike Shipulski
  4. Why You Don’t Need An Innovation Portfolio — by Robyn Bolton
  5. Do you have a fixed or growth mindset? — by Stefan Lindegaard
  6. Building a Psychologically Safe Team — by David Burkus
  7. Customer Wants and Needs Not the Same — by Shep Hyken
  8. The Hard Problem of Consciousness is Not That Hard — by Geoffrey A. Moore
  9. Great Coaches Do These Things — by Mike Shipulski
  10. How Not to Get in Your Own Way — by Mike Shipulski

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in August that continue to resonate with people:

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last three years:

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Building a Psychologically Safe Team

Building a Psychologically Safe Team

GUEST POST from David Burkus

One of the most consistent findings in organizational behavior over the last decade has been just how significantly team performance is affected by psychological safety. A psychologically safe team is one where team members feel comfortable being themselves, expressing their ideas and opinions, and taking risks without fear of being punished or ostracized. Teams with high psychological safety learn faster, communicate better, and hence collaborate more effectively.

At its core, psychological safety is marked by a sense of mutual trust and respect. And these are two different things. Trust is how much teammates feel they can share their authentic selves with others. Respect is how much teammates feel the team will accept that self. If I trust you, then I will share honestly with you. If you respect me, then you will value what I’ve shared.

In this article, we’ll cover four ways to create a more psychologically safe team—with the first two focusing on trust and the second two on respect.

Be Vulnerable First

The first way to build a psychologically safe team is to be vulnerable first. This is a powerful way to build trust because trust on a team grows reciprocally. When someone makes themselves vulnerable, they signal to the team that they’re trusting the team. And teammates feel trusted and respond in a trustworthy manner (most of the time). This cycle repeats itself over time and trust grows alongside it. As a leader, that means it falls upon you to demonstrate trust first by being vulnerable first. You don’t need to share embarrassing secrets or your deepest fears, but a simple “I don’t know” when discussing a problem or a simple sharing of a few weaknesses can be an important moment in the development of trust on your team. Don’t make people earn your trust. Trust them and let them respond with trustworthiness.

Accept (but learn from) Failures

The second way to build a psychologically safe team is to accept (but learn from) the team’s failures. Failures on a team can’t be avoided—and they can’t be ignored. You’ll have to deal with repeated failures or performance issues, but often unexpected failures get overlooked (or worse). Projects sometimes run over budget, clients change their mind, global pandemics threaten the supply chain and force everyone to work at home in their pajamas. When failures happen, the human reaction is to deflect or excuse away failures. So, when teams face failures, they often fight over who is to blame. But psychologically safe teams recognize failure is a learning opportunity and see honest conversations about what happened and what can be changed in the future to prevent failures. As a leader, take your team through an after-action review when failures happen and celebrate any moments of honesty or responsibility you see. Doing so sends the message that failure is feedback—not something to be deflected.

Model Active Listening

The third way to build a psychologically safe team is to model active listening. This helps teammates feel respected, the other side of psychological safety. Leaders don’t have to accept every idea their team shares to build respect, but they do have to ensue every teammate feels listened to. And modelling active listening not only ensures you’re listening to the team—it also teaches the team by example how to listen better to each other. Make sure you’re actively focused on the person speaking, not looking at a phone or laptop. Nod your head and utter small “hmms” and “ahhs” to show you’re responding and processing what you hear. Follow up with questions based on what you heard that signal listening and encourage them to expound on their ideas. And before you offer your thoughts, summarize what you heard them say to confirm that you understand. Doing so will ensure the other person feels listened to—because you were actually listening.

Treat Conflict As Collaboration

The fourth way to build a psychologically safe team is to treat conflict as collaboration. It’s difficult to model active listening when the person speaking is sharing an idea or action in conflict with something you’ve previously said. It’s hard to actively listen when in conflict because you’re wanting to jump in and defend your original idea. But for building respect, it’s crucial to remember that task-focused conflict is a form of collaboration. People who disagree with their teammates aren’t (usually) saying their teammates are dumb, they’re saying they see the situation differently and care enough to share. Resist the urge to shoot down the conflicting idea, and use the questioning time during active listening to ask questions about the assumptions made or information that leads this person to a different conclusion. Meet conflict with curiosity about how they concluded something different than you. You’ll not only maintain respect, you’ll often find out that their way is a better solution anyway.

Looking at these actions collectively, it’s easier to notice the interplay between trust and respect that leads to a psychologically safe team. Trusting moments need to be met with respect, otherwise they might trigger distrust. But when teams develop both simultaneously, they start to share diverse perspectives and generate better ideas—and they gradually become a team where everyone can do their best work ever.

Image credit: Pixabay

Originally published at https://davidburkus.com on February 25, 2023.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of May 2023

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of May 2023Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are May’s ten most popular innovation posts:

  1. A 90% Project Failure Rate Means You’re Doing it Wrong — by Mike Shipulski
  2. ‘Innovation’ is Killing Innovation. How Do We Save It? — by Robyn Bolton
  3. Sustaining Imagination is Hard — by Braden Kelley
  4. Unintended Consequences. The Hidden Risk of Fast-Paced Innovation — by Pete Foley
  5. 8 Strategies to Future-Proofing Your Business & Gaining Competitive Advantage — by Teresa Spangler
  6. How to Determine if Your Problem is Worth Solving — by Mike Shipulski
  7. Sprint Toward the Innovation Action — by Mike Shipulski
  8. Moneyball and the Beginning, Middle, and End of Innovation — by Robyn Bolton
  9. A Shortcut to Making Strategic Trade-Offs — by Geoffrey A. Moore
  10. 3 Innovation Types Not What You Think They Are — by Robyn Bolton

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in April that continue to resonate with people:

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last three years:

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Psychological Safety, Growth Mindset and Difficult Conversations to Shape the Future

Psychological Safety, Growth Mindset and Difficult Conversations to Shape the Future

GUEST POST from Stefan Lindegaard

How can we embrace and implement the growth mindset and psychological safety in our organization? How can we train our people and in particular our leaders on this? How do we get better at shaping the future?

Those are questions I hear often these days as the interest in the above topics rises fast.

In this post, I share lots of ideas on how you and your organization can embrace the growth mindset, psychological safety and related attributes in the context of shaping the future. Feel free to use my work as you see fit as long as you give due credit!

At the same time, I hope you will read this and give me some feedback as this is also a work-in-progress approach for how I work with my clients on these topics.

It’s a longer than usual read, but skim through and stop, read more if you find something of interest to you. I have also added a number of images at the end. Enjoy!

Introduction

The purpose is to help individuals, teams and leaders get even better at shaping the future in the context of people and organizational as well as market and business perspectives.

The key pillars are the growth mindset, psychological safety and innovation for an agile, learning organization.

The problem/challenge

In general, the leaders in most large organizations are very capable at managing the day-to-day activities while they struggle in terms of mindset, skills and tool-box on shaping the future activities.

The challenge is that leaders can’t become great leaders – or even good leaders – who can take your organization to the next level if they do not find the right balance between managing the day-to-day activities and shaping the future.

This balance should not be 50/50. It should not even be close to that as the day-to-day issues will always require more focus and attention than the future-shaping activities. However, the current balance of 90/10 as we see in most companies is not healthy and we need to change this in order to develop an organization that will be even more ready for a future driven by constant change and disruption on many levels.

Why do we need to work with the growth mindset and psychological safety in this context?

It’s quite simple. If these pre-requisites are not in place, you can’t build an environment that allows your organization to be good at shaping the future and then you are left with only being good at managing the day-to-day activities.

This has been enough to be successful for decades, but it will not work for the future. So, do you want your leaders to be stuck at the past and present or should they get ready for shaping the future as well?

The approach, solution

You can develop a tailored program based on The Collective Growth Mindset framework which helps you embrace and implement the growth mindset approach and complementary attributes such as psychological safety within your organization.

It’s a training and coaching program that builds on these five elements: Mindset, Shape/Pulse, Communicate, Learn and Network.

Here’s a short description on the elements for each area.

The mindset of your team

  • Know the mindset of yourself and your team members
  • Map the mindset of key stakeholders and/or a specific leadership team
  • Group reflection on behaviors and actions (if any) to be taken on this

The shape and pulse of your team

  • What’s in it for me? – address an important question
  • Know the T-shapes
  • Understand your level of psychological safety and ability to have hard conversations
  • Do you play to win or not to lose?
  • Know your barriers, obstacles and attack the root causes in the context of getting stuff done

The communication of and around your team

  • Know how to have the hard conversations
  • Build mechanisms to ensure better feedback
  • Create a common language (big picture, smaller tasks)
  • Work your stakeholders with consistent messages

The learning ways for your team

  • Know how you learn the best as individuals and as a team
  • Apply shared, peer learning for better access to “tacit” knowledge
  • Take the first steps for a PLC, a personal learning cloud

The network and networking capabilities of your team

  • Network for the future, not the past
  • The mindset of your network
  • Learn to build better networks and relationships

The key delivery elements within our program are training sessions (physical and on-demand) and coaching for individuals and teams. See more on this below.

Actions, desired achievements

Having the above five elements as the starting point, we focus on specific actions and desired achievements such as:

Identification of needs and opportunities

The Collective Growth Mindset framework offers much depth, but we need to make sure our efforts fit the needs and opportunities of our participants. We map this out and use it as the main guiding tool for our activities.

Training sessions

Shorter sessions (even micro-learning – few minutes) and up to full-day workshops are used to address the needs and opportunities. It will be a mix of inspirational insights and hands-on workshops. We focus on mindset as well as actions. This will be delivered physically and virtually and when possible, we will save this for on-demand learning.

Coaching

Constructively thought-provoking coaching sessions will be made available for individuals as well as teams. Here, we can go in-depth with more specific and even personal elements.

Role models

We help leaders become role models on the growth mindset. We do this by minimizing and eliminating the negative behaviors while enforcing the positive behavior in the context of the growth mindset for teams and the organization.

Story-tellers

Once, we are on track to help leaders become better role-models, we work with them to become good story-tellers on the growth mindset. This allows us to build a positive circle of strong communication that can help change behaviors for the better.

Hard conversations

Great leaders can facilitate hard conversation within their own leadership teams as well as within the teams they lead themselves. For this, we help them identify and address the weaknesses and strengths and we give them practical tools for having such conversations.

Conversation and feedback guides

We develop feedback guides and tools to help your people, teams and leaders get better at feedback. This goes for giving as well as receiving.

Network for the future, not just the past and the present

Networking, relationship skills are underrated and underserved. It’s unfortunately often assumed that this – networking – happens by itself. Not true as this requires direction, effort and time. We address this in the context that the people you network and associate yourself with are highly influential on what and how you learn. Thus, this impacts your mindset.

Behavioral metrics and KPI’s

There are too few metrics and KPI’s that focuses on behaviors and in particular some that can measure a “live” progress. We will address this through on-going self- and team assessments and the tracking a chosen keywords within the communication of our target groups.

Creating the psychological safety, team by team

Professor Amy C. Edmondson defines psychological safety as “a belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes.” We work with assessments and exercises to help your teams and organization to create a high level of psychological safety.

Personal learning cloud

Within the current learning systems at Wartsila, we build a personal learning cloud with training and materials that are targeted to and relevant for each participant. Although this has a personal starting point, it will also be social and collaborative as this is how we need to embrace and implement the growth mindset and its attributes.

Conclusion

I sense a lot of power and value in the growth mindset approach and its attributes like psychological safety, hard conversations, networking etc.

However, we are also in the early phases of developing the concepts and frameworks we need to make this happen within our organizations.

My ambition is to share what I know to help move this forward in a collective way. The tide rises all boats. We all win. Let’s help each other get better!

Thanks for reading this. Your likes, shares, questions and comments are much appreciated.

Image Credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of Psychological Safety in Fostering Innovation

The Role of Psychological Safety in Fostering Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the rapidly changing world of business, innovation isn’t just encouraged—it’s essential for survival. Yet, fostering an environment where innovation thrives isn’t merely about investing in the latest technology or having creative job titles. At the foundation of sustained innovation lies a crucial and often overlooked factor: psychological safety.

Psychological safety, a term popularized by Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, refers to a team climate characterized by interpersonal trust and mutual respect, where people are comfortable being themselves. In such an environment, team members feel safe to take risks, voice their ideas, and even fail—all without the fear of repercussion or ridicule. Let’s explore the pivotal role psychological safety plays in enhancing innovation potential within organizations, supported by real-world case studies.

The Science of Psychological Safety

Several studies highlight the profound impact of psychological safety on team performance. When team members feel psychologically safe, they are more likely to engage in learning behaviors—seeking feedback, sharing information, experimenting, and discussing mistakes. These behaviors are the bedrock of an innovative culture, fostering environments where breakthroughs happen and improvements are continuous.

“Innovation is fueled by the ability to connect previously unconnected information and ideas. This happens best when people feel comfortable to express their diverse thoughts without fear.” — Braden Kelley

Case Study 1: Google’s Project Aristotle

Google’s Project Aristotle was a comprehensive research initiative to understand what makes teams effective. After studying over 180 teams, Google discerned that the most successful teams shared a common characteristic—psychological safety.

Teams with high levels of psychological safety were not necessarily composed of all-star players. Instead, their success stemmed from encouraging equal speaking opportunities among team members, empathy towards one another, and valuing diversity of thought. These teams were more innovative and productive. Google now emphasizes psychological safety as a cornerstone of its team-building exercises and leadership training, firmly embedding it into their culture.

Case Study 2: Toyota’s Culture of Continuous Improvement

Toyota is renowned for its continuous improvement methodology, known as Kaizen. A significant contributor to the success of this approach is the cultivation of psychological safety within their teams. Toyota encourages its employees to voice their opinions and suggest improvements without the fear of negative consequences. This approach has led to significant innovations and enhancements in their production processes and has positioned Toyota as a leader in quality and efficiency in the automobile industry.

For example, Toyota’s commitment to psychological safety was evident in their assembly line workers’ empowerment. Workers could stop the production line if they identified a problem, so it could be fixed promptly. This policy not only improved overall quality but also reinforced the value of each worker’s input, thereby driving innovation from all levels of the company.

Creating a Psychologically Safe Environment

Launching into this cultural transformation isn’t merely a top-down directive. It involves cultivating a grass-roots shift and embedding psychological safety into the team’s DNA. Here are several strategies organizations can implement to foster a more psychologically safe environment:

1. Encourage Open Communication

Create an atmosphere where team members feel encouraged to share their ideas and opinions without judgment. Regularly solicit feedback and listen actively to what your team has to say.

2. Demonstrate Vulnerability as a Leader

Leaders should model the behavior they wish to see by admitting their own mistakes and uncertainties. This openness can help set a tone that failing and learning are part of the creative process.

3. Normalize Inclusivity and Diversity

Value and harness the diversity of your team by recognizing the variety of perspectives that members bring. Cultivate an inclusive environment where different viewpoints are appreciated and respected.

4. Provide Constructive Feedback

Deliver feedback that is constructive and focused on improvement rather than personal criticism. Encourage a growth mindset where feedback is viewed as a pathway to better performance and innovation.

5. Encourage Experimentation

Create opportunities for your team to try new ideas in a safe environment. Emphasize learning from what doesn’t work as much as from what does.

Conclusion

In a world where innovation is more critical than ever, creating and nurturing psychologically safe environments has proven to be a key enabler of creative and effective teams. By embracing psychological safety, organizations unlock the full potential of their workforce, allowing for the free exchange of ideas, increased engagement, and transformational innovations. When organizations commit to embedding this principle into their culture, they pave the way for sustainable success and groundbreaking advancements.

Let us champion the charge towards psychological safety and make innovation a cornerstone of our work environments, paving the path towards a brighter, more innovative future.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of Psychological Safety in Innovation

The Role of Psychological Safety in Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the rapidly changing world of business, innovation is the lifeblood of sustained success. Harnessing creativity, collaboration, and experimentation is crucial, yet these elements can only thrive in an environment where team members feel psychologically safe. Psychological safety is the belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes. This article explores the vital role of psychological safety in fostering innovation and presents case studies to illustrate its impact in real-world scenarios.

Understanding Psychological Safety

Coined by Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, psychological safety describes a workplace culture where individuals feel secure enough to take interpersonal risks. This concept is critical for innovation because it encourages openness, where employees can freely share ideas, experiment without fear of failure, and embrace creative problem-solving processes.

Benefits of Psychological Safety for Innovation

  • Encourages Idea Generation: Team members are more likely to propose innovative ideas if they are confident they won’t be ridiculed or dismissed.</ li>
  • Facilitates Learning from Mistakes: A psychologically safe environment allows teams to learn and grow from failures, turning setbacks into stepping stones for future success.
  • Enhances Collaboration: When employees feel safe, they are more likely to share knowledge, ask for help, and work together effectively.
  • Increases Employee Engagement: Psychological safety fosters a sense of belonging and motivation, leading to higher levels of engagement and productivity.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Google’s Project Aristotle

Google embarked on a quest to understand what makes a team effective, which led to Project Aristotle in 2012. Through extensive research, they discovered that psychological safety was the most critical factor in high-performing teams.

Challenges Faced: Google identified that many of their teams struggled with collaboration due to fear of judgment or reproach.

Actions Taken: Google implemented practices to foster psychological safety. This included promoting open dialogue, encouraging risk-taking without penalization, and ensuring every team member’s voice was heard.

Results: Teams that embraced psychological safety showed significant improvements in innovation output, efficiency, and employee satisfaction. The project reinforced that fostering a safe environment for risk-taking and open communications was essential to driving innovation.

Case Study 2: W.L. Gore & Associates

W.L. Gore & Associates, the company behind Gore-Tex, is renowned for its unique organizational culture that emphasizes psychological safety.

Challenges Faced: As a company rooted in innovative product development, ensuring continuous creativity while managing market pressures posed significant challenges.

Actions Taken: W.L. Gore adopted a flat organizational structure and a philosophy called “lattices,” where associates have the freedom to speak up, propose ideas, and lead projects without hierarchical constraints.

Results: This approach led to groundbreaking products and technologies, such as the Gore-Tex fabric. By sustaining an environment where associates felt safe to experiment and potentially fail, Gore consistently maintained a pipeline of innovative products.

Conclusion

Innovation thrives where psychological safety is prioritized. Organizations that nurture an environment of trust and openness not only unlock their employees’ creative potential but also drive sustainable growth and success. Leaders must actively foster psychological safety to build dynamic, innovative teams ready to tackle the challenges of the future.

This article features a thorough examination of the role of psychological safety in innovation, with practical insights conveyed through notable case studies from Google and W.L. Gore & Associates, reinforcing the concept’s critical importance in real-world applications.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Impact of Psychological Safety on Innovation Success

The Impact of Psychological Safety on Innovation Success

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s rapidly changing business environment, the ability to innovate has become a crucial differentiator for organizations. However, one indispensable factor that often goes unnoticed is psychological safety. Teams that feel safe to take risks and voice their ideas without fear of retribution are the ones most likely to succeed in driving innovation. This article explores the profound impact of psychological safety on innovation success, supported by two compelling case studies.

What is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety is a shared belief held by members of a team that it is safe to take interpersonal risks. It was first introduced by Harvard professor Amy Edmondson, who described it as a climate in which people are comfortable expressing and being themselves. The concept is integral for fostering an innovative culture, as it encourages open dialogue, creativity, and the willingness to challenge the status quo.

The Link Between Psychological Safety and Innovation

Organizations that cultivate psychological safety can expect a more engaged, motivated, and innovative workforce. The freedom to fail without fear of humiliation or punishment leads to higher levels of experimentation and risk-taking, both of which are essential for innovation. Several studies have shown a strong correlation between psychological safety and innovation outcomes, making it a non-negotiable element for organizations aiming to stay ahead of the curve.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Google’s Project Aristotle

Google conducted an extensive research project, code-named Project Aristotle, to identify what makes an effective team. The study revealed that psychological safety was the most significant factor in determining team success.

  • Findings: Teams with high psychological safety were found to be more innovative and effective.
  • Implementation: Google implemented various strategies to foster psychological safety, including encouraging open communication, setting clear expectations, and creating a supportive environment.
  • Outcome: As a result, teams became more collaborative and productive, leading to numerous successful projects and innovations.

Case Study 2: Microsoft’s Culture Transformation

When Satya Nadella became the CEO of Microsoft, he introduced a culture of openness and psychological safety that significantly contributed to the company’s turnaround and innovation success.

  • Findings: Nadella recognized that fostering a growth mindset and a safe environment for risk-taking were crucial for innovation.
  • Implementation: Microsoft launched several initiatives, such as internal hackathons and the “One Week” experiment, which encouraged employees to pitch and develop new ideas.
  • Outcome: This shift led to a surge in creative solutions and innovative products, helping Microsoft reclaim its position as a leading tech company.

Strategies for Building Psychological Safety

  • Encourage Open Communication: Foster an environment where team members feel comfortable sharing their thoughts and ideas without fear of judgment.
  • Promote a Growth Mindset: Encourage learning from mistakes and view them as opportunities for growth rather than failures.
  • Model Vulnerability: Leaders should demonstrate vulnerability by admitting their own mistakes and showing that it’s okay to not have all the answers.
  • Recognize and Reward: Acknowledge and reward innovative thinking and risk-taking to reinforce the value of psychological safety.

Conclusion

Psychological safety is a foundational element for any organization aiming to foster a culture of innovation. The case studies of Google and Microsoft demonstrate that creating an environment where employees feel safe to take risks, voice their ideas, and learn from failures leads to significant innovation success. By implementing strategies to build psychological safety, organizations can unlock the full potential of their teams and thrive in an ever-evolving business landscape.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Building a Change-Ready Culture

Exploring the key elements required to cultivate an organizational culture that embraces and welcomes change

Building a Change-Ready Culture

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s fast-paced, ever-evolving business landscape, organizations must be equipped with the ability to adapt and thrive amidst constant change. However, many companies struggle to adopt a change-ready culture, often leading to resistance, inefficiency, and missed opportunities. Building a culture that embraces and welcomes change is crucial for long-term success. This article will explore two case study examples highlighting the key elements required to cultivate such an organizational culture.

Case Study 1: Google

Google is renowned for its culture of innovation and agility. One significant factor contributing to this is its emphasis on psychological safety. Google understands that for employees to embrace change, they need to feel safe to take risks and share their ideas openly. The company fosters an inclusive environment where individual contributions are valued, encouraging employees to experiment and learn from failures without fear of retribution. By creating a psychological safety net, Google empowers its employees to adapt to changing circumstances and proactively seek innovative solutions.

Another essential element in Google’s change-ready culture is transparency. The company ensures that information flows freely throughout the organization, from top to bottom and horizontally across teams. This transparency helps employees understand the reasons behind changes and their potential impact on the business. By keeping everyone informed, Google minimizes resistance to change and enables employees to rally around shared goals.

Case Study 2: Netflix

Netflix is another organization renowned for its adaptive culture. One crucial element in Netflix’s change-ready culture is its focus on talent development and continuous learning. The company believes that agile organizations require agile minds. To cultivate a culture that embraces change, Netflix invests heavily in providing its employees with opportunities for growth and development. Constant learning and upskilling are seen as essential, not only for personal development but also for the organization’s ability to adapt to change effectively.

Netflix also prioritizes autonomy in decision-making. By empowering its employees to make decisions and take ownership of their projects, the company encourages a sense of accountability. This autonomy fosters agility by enabling employees to respond quickly to changing circumstances, without the delays associated with hierarchical approval processes.

Key Elements for a Change-Ready Culture:

1. Psychological Safety: Creating an environment where employees feel safe to take risks, share ideas, and learn from failures without fear of retribution.

2. Transparency: Ensuring open and clear communication to help employees understand the reasons behind change and foster a sense of shared purpose.

3. Talent Development: Providing employees with opportunities for continuous learning and growth to cultivate agile minds.

4. Autonomy: Empowering employees to make decisions and take ownership of their projects, allowing for quick responses to change.

Conclusion

Building a change-ready culture is crucial for organizations that want to thrive in today’s dynamic business environment. The case studies of Google and Netflix demonstrate the importance of elements such as psychological safety, transparency, talent development, and autonomy in fostering a culture that embraces and welcomes change. By incorporating these elements into their organizational DNA, companies can position themselves for long-term success in an ever-changing world.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.