Tag Archives: psychological safety

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of January 2024

Leave a reply

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of January 2024Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are January’s ten most popular innovation posts:

  1. Top 40 Innovation Bloggers of 2023 — Curated by Braden Kelley
  2. Creating Organizational Agility — by Howard Tiersky
  3. 5 Simple Steps to Team Alignment — by David Burkus
  4. 5 Essential Customer Experience Tools to Master — by Braden Kelley
  5. Four Ways To Empower Change In Your Organization — by Greg Satell
  6. AI as an Innovation Tool – How to Work with a Deeply Flawed Genius! — by Pete Foley
  7. Top 100 Innovation and Transformation Articles of 2023 — Curated by Braden Kelley
  8. 80% of Psychological Safety Has Nothing to Do With Psychology — by Robyn Bolton
  9. How will you allocate your time differently in 2024? — by Mike Shipulski
  10. Leadership Development Fundamentals – Work Products — by Mike Shipulski

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in December that continue to resonate with people:

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last four years:

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How to Use Your Nervous System to Feel Psychologically Safe

Leave a reply

or “Why Mandating a Return to the Office Destroys Safety”

How to Use Your Nervous System to Feel Psychologically Safe

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

In last week’s episode, we learned that psychological safety is more neuroscience than psychology and the huge role our nervous system plays in our experience of safety. 

This week, we’re going deeper into our nervous system and how we can use our understanding of it to influence our psychology.

I’m sensing I can’t think my way to safety.  So, can I fix my nervous system to feel safe and smart?

This is where I go beyond Dr. Amy Edmondson’s definition of psychological safety to incorporate neuroscience and how our nervous system works.

Our nervous system has three states:

  1. Immobilization or the freeze response, as you felt, is often accompanied by a sense of overwhelm
  2. Fight-and-flight when you try to either end the conversation or become more aggressive, resistant, and push back on exploring other alternatives.
  3. Rest-and-Digest when you feel safe, social, and connected to the people around you

This third state sets humans and mammals apart from other living things.  Communicating and connecting serve as a survival mechanism and represent a safe state for our nervous system.  When we communicate and connect, our tribe looks out for us and keeps us safe from threats like lions or unfriendly tribes.

So, the answer is to foster more profound connections among human beings, which requires going well beyond our work roles and activities.

Does it require hugging?  I knew it would require hugging.

Don’t worry, hugging isn’t mandatory.

We, as individuals, have a strong desire to connect and communicate, but it doesn’t necessarily require physical proximity. Being physically together doesn’t guarantee anything.

But what about the push to return to the office? There’s even research to support executives’ claims that physical proximity is essential to culture, innovation, and connection.

Not only does physical proximity not guarantee anything, but being forced to return to the office causes more harm than good. 

From a safety perspective, our nervous system doesn’t want to feel trapped. Being forced back to the office activates our flight-or-fight response and erodes safety. Because of how our nervous system perceives choices, the more choices people have, the safer they feel.

Even though I’m tempted to ask questions about building psychological safety at the team or company level, I want to stay on the individual level for a moment. We talked about how I wasn’t consciously unsafe during a phone call. How can I tell when I feel unsafe if I’m not conscious of it?

There’s physical science behind what happens when you feel unsafe. Your heart rate increases, you might hold your breath, and your body may tense up.  Your thoughts might blank out, and your peripheral vision may narrow as your body prepares for fight or flight.  Your body doesn’t differentiate; it treats any threat as a threatening event.

On the other hand, feeling safe doesn’t mean you lack emotions or feel calm. Feeling calm and internally relaxed signifies safety, but it’s more than that.  When your nervous system is regulated, your emotions align with the situation. They’re not an extreme overreaction or underreaction. There’s congruence. If your emotional response matches the situation, your nervous system and brain feel safe.

That makes sense, but it’s not easy.  We’re trained to hide our emotions and always appear calm.  I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard and said, “Be a duck.  Calm on the surface and paddling like hell below it.”

And that is not congruent.  But congruence doesn’t mean you act out like a toddler, either.

Step one in creating safety is calming your nervous system by verbalizing your feelings. If you say, “This conversation is overwhelming for me. I need a break. Let me get some water,” you’re safe and regulated at that moment. There’s nothing wrong.

But when you can’t verbalize what you’re experiencing and freeze, that’s a sign you’re no longer in a safe state. Your body starts pumping cortisol and adrenaline, preparing for whatever it perceives as a threat.

Even if you feel overwhelmed, if you’re aware of that feeling and can take some breaths or a short break and return to the conversation, you’re in a safe, regulated state.

I can’t imagine admitting to feeling overwhelmed or asking for a break! Plus, I work with so many people who say, “I feel overwhelmed, but I can’t take a moment for myself.  I need to plow through and get this done.”

It takes a tremendous amount of self-awareness. If you want to create safety and emotional intelligence, you must know what you’re feeling and be able to name it. You also need to sense what others are feeling and understand your emotional impact on them.

For example, if you say, “I’m feeling overwhelmed right now,” and I respond calmly and slow my cadence of speech, your nervous system receives the message that everything is okay.  However, if I’m in “fight or flight” mode and you’re overwhelmed, we’ll end up in a chaotic and unproductive cycle.

Self-awareness and understanding are essential to safety. Unfortunately, many organizations I speak with need help with this.

Amen, sister,

Stay tuned for next week’s exciting conclusion, 3 Steps to Building a Psychologically Safe Environment or The No-Cost, No-Hug Secret to Smarter Teams

Image Credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

80% of Psychological Safety Has Nothing to Do With Psychology

5 Replies

or Why the Lack of Psychological Safety Makes You Dumber

80% of Psychological Safety Has Nothing to Do With Psychology

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

It’s been over 20 years since “Psychological Safety” exploded onto the scene and into the business lexicon.  But as good as it sounded, I always felt like it was one of those “safe space, everyone gets a trophy, special snowflake” things we had to do to make the Millennials (and subsequent generations) happy.

Then I read Alla Weinberg’s book, A Culture of Safety, and realized I was very, very wrong.

It’s not the equivalent of an HR-approved hug and high-five. 

It’s the foundation of what we do. Without it, there is no productivity, creativity, or progress.

Needing to know more, I reached out to Alla, who graciously agreed to teach me.

Thanks for speaking with me, Alla.  Let’s get right to the point: why should I, or any business leader, care about psychological safety?

The short answer is that without psychological safety, you are dumber.  When you feel unsafe, your operating IQ, which you use for daily tasks, drops in half.

Think about all the people you work with or all the people in your company.  They’re there because they’re smart, have experience, and demonstrated that they can do the job.  But then something goes wrong, and you wonder why they didn’t anticipate it or plan appropriately to avoid it.  You start to question their competence when, in fact, it may be that they feel unsafe, so parts of their brain have gone offline.  Their operating IQ isn’t operating at 100%.

I am so guilty of this.  When things go wrong, I assume someone didn’t know what to do, so they need to be trained, or they did know what to do and decided not to do it. It never occurs to me that there could be something else, something not logical, going on.

We all forget that human beings are biological creatures, and survival is the number one evolutionary trait for all living beings. Our body and mind are wired to ensure our continued existence.

A part of the brain – the prefrontal cortex, responsible for planning, executive thought, and analysis – is unique to humans, and it goes offline when our body feels unsafe. 

When we experience extreme stress, our body and mind cannot distinguish an impending deadline from a lunging tiger.  Our body and mind prioritize survival, so we experience all the biological responses to a threat, like getting tunnel vision, losing peripheral vision, and perceiving limited options.

So, when you’re trying to meet a deadline, and your manager or supervisor asks why you didn’t consider alternatives or complete a specific task, it’s because you physically couldn’t think of it at that moment. This is how human beings operate.

My first reaction is to wonder who can’t tell the difference between a deadline and a tiger because if you can’t tell the difference between the two, you may have bigger problems.  But when you mentioned the inability to perceive options, I immediately thought of something that happened yesterday.

I was on a call with a client, someone I’ve worked with for years and consider a friend, and we were trying to restructure a program to serve their client’s needs better.  I didn’t feel under threat…

Consciously.  You didn’t consciously feel under threat.

Right, I didn’t feel consciously under threat. But I froze.  I absolutely couldn’t think.  I put my head in my hands and tried to block out all the light and the noise, and I still couldn’t think of any option other than what we were already doing.  My brain came to a screeching halt.

That’s your nervous system, and it’s a huge driver of psychological safety.  80% of the information our brain receives comes from our nervous system.  So, while you didn’t consciously feel unsafe, your body felt unsafe and sent a signal to your brain to go into survival mode, and your brain chose to freeze.

But it was a Zoom call.  I was sitting alone in my office. I wasn’t unsafe.  Why would my nervous system think I was unsafe?

Your nervous system doesn’t think. It perceives and reacts.  Let me give you a simple illustration that we’ve all experienced.  When you touch something hot, your hand immediately pulls away.  You say “ouch” after your hand is away from the heat source.  When you felt the hot object, your nervous system entered survival mode and pulled away your hand.  Your brain then had to catch up, so you saw “Ow” after the threat was over.

Hold up.  We’re talking about psychological safety.  What does my nervous system have to do with this?

I define psychological safety as a state of our nervous system with three states: safe, mobilized (fight or flight), and immobilized (freeze response). The tricky part is not psychological but neurobiological. You cannot think your way to safety or unfreeze yourself. The rational mind has no control over this. Mantras and mindsets won’t make you feel safe; it’s a neurobiological process.

That is a plot twist I did not see coming.

Stay tuned for Part 2:

How to Use Your Nervous System to Feel Psychologically Safe, or “Why Mandating a Return to the Office Destroys Safety”

Image Credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of September 2023

Leave a reply

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of September 2023Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are September’s ten most popular innovation posts:

  1. The Malcolm Gladwell Trap — by Greg Satell
  2. Where People Go Wrong with Minimum Viable Products — by Greg Satell
  3. Our People Metrics Are Broken — by Mike Shipulski
  4. Why You Don’t Need An Innovation Portfolio — by Robyn Bolton
  5. Do you have a fixed or growth mindset? — by Stefan Lindegaard
  6. Building a Psychologically Safe Team — by David Burkus
  7. Customer Wants and Needs Not the Same — by Shep Hyken
  8. The Hard Problem of Consciousness is Not That Hard — by Geoffrey A. Moore
  9. Great Coaches Do These Things — by Mike Shipulski
  10. How Not to Get in Your Own Way — by Mike Shipulski

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in August that continue to resonate with people:

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last three years:

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.






Building a Psychologically Safe Team

1 Reply

Building a Psychologically Safe Team

GUEST POST from David Burkus

One of the most consistent findings in organizational behavior over the last decade has been just how significantly team performance is affected by psychological safety. A psychologically safe team is one where team members feel comfortable being themselves, expressing their ideas and opinions, and taking risks without fear of being punished or ostracized. Teams with high psychological safety learn faster, communicate better, and hence collaborate more effectively.

At its core, psychological safety is marked by a sense of mutual trust and respect. And these are two different things. Trust is how much teammates feel they can share their authentic selves with others. Respect is how much teammates feel the team will accept that self. If I trust you, then I will share honestly with you. If you respect me, then you will value what I’ve shared.

In this article, we’ll cover four ways to create a more psychologically safe team—with the first two focusing on trust and the second two on respect.

Be Vulnerable First

The first way to build a psychologically safe team is to be vulnerable first. This is a powerful way to build trust because trust on a team grows reciprocally. When someone makes themselves vulnerable, they signal to the team that they’re trusting the team. And teammates feel trusted and respond in a trustworthy manner (most of the time). This cycle repeats itself over time and trust grows alongside it. As a leader, that means it falls upon you to demonstrate trust first by being vulnerable first. You don’t need to share embarrassing secrets or your deepest fears, but a simple “I don’t know” when discussing a problem or a simple sharing of a few weaknesses can be an important moment in the development of trust on your team. Don’t make people earn your trust. Trust them and let them respond with trustworthiness.

Accept (but learn from) Failures

The second way to build a psychologically safe team is to accept (but learn from) the team’s failures. Failures on a team can’t be avoided—and they can’t be ignored. You’ll have to deal with repeated failures or performance issues, but often unexpected failures get overlooked (or worse). Projects sometimes run over budget, clients change their mind, global pandemics threaten the supply chain and force everyone to work at home in their pajamas. When failures happen, the human reaction is to deflect or excuse away failures. So, when teams face failures, they often fight over who is to blame. But psychologically safe teams recognize failure is a learning opportunity and see honest conversations about what happened and what can be changed in the future to prevent failures. As a leader, take your team through an after-action review when failures happen and celebrate any moments of honesty or responsibility you see. Doing so sends the message that failure is feedback—not something to be deflected.

Model Active Listening

The third way to build a psychologically safe team is to model active listening. This helps teammates feel respected, the other side of psychological safety. Leaders don’t have to accept every idea their team shares to build respect, but they do have to ensue every teammate feels listened to. And modelling active listening not only ensures you’re listening to the team—it also teaches the team by example how to listen better to each other. Make sure you’re actively focused on the person speaking, not looking at a phone or laptop. Nod your head and utter small “hmms” and “ahhs” to show you’re responding and processing what you hear. Follow up with questions based on what you heard that signal listening and encourage them to expound on their ideas. And before you offer your thoughts, summarize what you heard them say to confirm that you understand. Doing so will ensure the other person feels listened to—because you were actually listening.

Treat Conflict As Collaboration

The fourth way to build a psychologically safe team is to treat conflict as collaboration. It’s difficult to model active listening when the person speaking is sharing an idea or action in conflict with something you’ve previously said. It’s hard to actively listen when in conflict because you’re wanting to jump in and defend your original idea. But for building respect, it’s crucial to remember that task-focused conflict is a form of collaboration. People who disagree with their teammates aren’t (usually) saying their teammates are dumb, they’re saying they see the situation differently and care enough to share. Resist the urge to shoot down the conflicting idea, and use the questioning time during active listening to ask questions about the assumptions made or information that leads this person to a different conclusion. Meet conflict with curiosity about how they concluded something different than you. You’ll not only maintain respect, you’ll often find out that their way is a better solution anyway.

Looking at these actions collectively, it’s easier to notice the interplay between trust and respect that leads to a psychologically safe team. Trusting moments need to be met with respect, otherwise they might trigger distrust. But when teams develop both simultaneously, they start to share diverse perspectives and generate better ideas—and they gradually become a team where everyone can do their best work ever.

Image credit: Pixabay

Originally published at https://davidburkus.com on February 25, 2023.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.






Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of May 2023

Leave a reply

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of May 2023Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are May’s ten most popular innovation posts:

  1. A 90% Project Failure Rate Means You’re Doing it Wrong — by Mike Shipulski
  2. ‘Innovation’ is Killing Innovation. How Do We Save It? — by Robyn Bolton
  3. Sustaining Imagination is Hard — by Braden Kelley
  4. Unintended Consequences. The Hidden Risk of Fast-Paced Innovation — by Pete Foley
  5. 8 Strategies to Future-Proofing Your Business & Gaining Competitive Advantage — by Teresa Spangler
  6. How to Determine if Your Problem is Worth Solving — by Mike Shipulski
  7. Sprint Toward the Innovation Action — by Mike Shipulski
  8. Moneyball and the Beginning, Middle, and End of Innovation — by Robyn Bolton
  9. A Shortcut to Making Strategic Trade-Offs — by Geoffrey A. Moore
  10. 3 Innovation Types Not What You Think They Are — by Robyn Bolton

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in April that continue to resonate with people:

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last three years:

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.






Psychological Safety, Growth Mindset and Difficult Conversations to Shape the Future

Leave a reply

Psychological Safety, Growth Mindset and Difficult Conversations to Shape the Future

GUEST POST from Stefan Lindegaard

How can we embrace and implement the growth mindset and psychological safety in our organization? How can we train our people and in particular our leaders on this? How do we get better at shaping the future?

Those are questions I hear often these days as the interest in the above topics rises fast.

In this post, I share lots of ideas on how you and your organization can embrace the growth mindset, psychological safety and related attributes in the context of shaping the future. Feel free to use my work as you see fit as long as you give due credit!

At the same time, I hope you will read this and give me some feedback as this is also a work-in-progress approach for how I work with my clients on these topics.

It’s a longer than usual read, but skim through and stop, read more if you find something of interest to you. I have also added a number of images at the end. Enjoy!

Introduction

The purpose is to help individuals, teams and leaders get even better at shaping the future in the context of people and organizational as well as market and business perspectives.

The key pillars are the growth mindset, psychological safety and innovation for an agile, learning organization.

The problem/challenge

In general, the leaders in most large organizations are very capable at managing the day-to-day activities while they struggle in terms of mindset, skills and tool-box on shaping the future activities.

The challenge is that leaders can’t become great leaders – or even good leaders – who can take your organization to the next level if they do not find the right balance between managing the day-to-day activities and shaping the future.

This balance should not be 50/50. It should not even be close to that as the day-to-day issues will always require more focus and attention than the future-shaping activities. However, the current balance of 90/10 as we see in most companies is not healthy and we need to change this in order to develop an organization that will be even more ready for a future driven by constant change and disruption on many levels.

Why do we need to work with the growth mindset and psychological safety in this context?

It’s quite simple. If these pre-requisites are not in place, you can’t build an environment that allows your organization to be good at shaping the future and then you are left with only being good at managing the day-to-day activities.

This has been enough to be successful for decades, but it will not work for the future. So, do you want your leaders to be stuck at the past and present or should they get ready for shaping the future as well?

The approach, solution

You can develop a tailored program based on The Collective Growth Mindset framework which helps you embrace and implement the growth mindset approach and complementary attributes such as psychological safety within your organization.

It’s a training and coaching program that builds on these five elements: Mindset, Shape/Pulse, Communicate, Learn and Network.

Here’s a short description on the elements for each area.

The mindset of your team

  • Know the mindset of yourself and your team members
  • Map the mindset of key stakeholders and/or a specific leadership team
  • Group reflection on behaviors and actions (if any) to be taken on this

The shape and pulse of your team

  • What’s in it for me? – address an important question
  • Know the T-shapes
  • Understand your level of psychological safety and ability to have hard conversations
  • Do you play to win or not to lose?
  • Know your barriers, obstacles and attack the root causes in the context of getting stuff done

The communication of and around your team

  • Know how to have the hard conversations
  • Build mechanisms to ensure better feedback
  • Create a common language (big picture, smaller tasks)
  • Work your stakeholders with consistent messages

The learning ways for your team

  • Know how you learn the best as individuals and as a team
  • Apply shared, peer learning for better access to “tacit” knowledge
  • Take the first steps for a PLC, a personal learning cloud

The network and networking capabilities of your team

  • Network for the future, not the past
  • The mindset of your network
  • Learn to build better networks and relationships

The key delivery elements within our program are training sessions (physical and on-demand) and coaching for individuals and teams. See more on this below.

Actions, desired achievements

Having the above five elements as the starting point, we focus on specific actions and desired achievements such as:

Identification of needs and opportunities

The Collective Growth Mindset framework offers much depth, but we need to make sure our efforts fit the needs and opportunities of our participants. We map this out and use it as the main guiding tool for our activities.

Training sessions

Shorter sessions (even micro-learning – few minutes) and up to full-day workshops are used to address the needs and opportunities. It will be a mix of inspirational insights and hands-on workshops. We focus on mindset as well as actions. This will be delivered physically and virtually and when possible, we will save this for on-demand learning.

Coaching

Constructively thought-provoking coaching sessions will be made available for individuals as well as teams. Here, we can go in-depth with more specific and even personal elements.

Role models

We help leaders become role models on the growth mindset. We do this by minimizing and eliminating the negative behaviors while enforcing the positive behavior in the context of the growth mindset for teams and the organization.

Story-tellers

Once, we are on track to help leaders become better role-models, we work with them to become good story-tellers on the growth mindset. This allows us to build a positive circle of strong communication that can help change behaviors for the better.

Hard conversations

Great leaders can facilitate hard conversation within their own leadership teams as well as within the teams they lead themselves. For this, we help them identify and address the weaknesses and strengths and we give them practical tools for having such conversations.

Conversation and feedback guides

We develop feedback guides and tools to help your people, teams and leaders get better at feedback. This goes for giving as well as receiving.

Network for the future, not just the past and the present

Networking, relationship skills are underrated and underserved. It’s unfortunately often assumed that this – networking – happens by itself. Not true as this requires direction, effort and time. We address this in the context that the people you network and associate yourself with are highly influential on what and how you learn. Thus, this impacts your mindset.

Behavioral metrics and KPI’s

There are too few metrics and KPI’s that focuses on behaviors and in particular some that can measure a “live” progress. We will address this through on-going self- and team assessments and the tracking a chosen keywords within the communication of our target groups.

Creating the psychological safety, team by team

Professor Amy C. Edmondson defines psychological safety as “a belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes.” We work with assessments and exercises to help your teams and organization to create a high level of psychological safety.

Personal learning cloud

Within the current learning systems at Wartsila, we build a personal learning cloud with training and materials that are targeted to and relevant for each participant. Although this has a personal starting point, it will also be social and collaborative as this is how we need to embrace and implement the growth mindset and its attributes.

Conclusion

I sense a lot of power and value in the growth mindset approach and its attributes like psychological safety, hard conversations, networking etc.

However, we are also in the early phases of developing the concepts and frameworks we need to make this happen within our organizations.

My ambition is to share what I know to help move this forward in a collective way. The tide rises all boats. We all win. Let’s help each other get better!

Thanks for reading this. Your likes, shares, questions and comments are much appreciated.

Image Credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.






Psychological Safety: The Foundation of a Thriving and Innovative Culture

Leave a reply

Psychological Safety: The Foundation of a Thriving and Innovative Culture

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world defined by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA), the old rules of leadership no longer apply. For too long, we have celebrated organizational cultures built on a foundation of intense competition, relentless efficiency, and a drive for individual brilliance. The implicit message was simple: success belongs to the most competent, the most certain, and the most productive. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I am here to argue that this approach is fundamentally flawed. The most resilient, innovative, and high-performing teams are not the ones with the most talent, but the ones with the most trust. Their secret weapon is a concept known as **psychological safety**, the shared belief that the team is a safe place for taking interpersonal risks.

Psychological safety is not about being “nice” or creating a “safe space” for mediocrity. It’s about building a foundation of trust where people feel safe enough to be vulnerable. It’s the feeling that you can admit a mistake, ask a “stupid” question, or challenge the status quo without fear of being ridiculed, shamed, or punished. This is a crucial distinction. When psychological safety is absent, our natural human instinct to self-preserve kicks in. We self-censor, we withhold critical information, and we stick to the known, a recipe for stagnation and eventual failure. But when it’s present, something magical happens: individual intelligence transforms into collective genius. Teams learn faster, innovate more freely, and adapt to change with a level of agility that is impossible in a fear-based environment.

The Business Case for Safety: Why Trust is Your Greatest Asset

The argument for psychological safety isn’t just a philosophical one; it’s a strategic imperative with a clear business case. Research from a wide range of fields—from organizational psychology to neuroscience—confirms its power. In a landmark study, Google’s “Project Aristotle,” researchers set out to find the secret to the company’s most effective teams. They analyzed everything from individual skills to personality types, but the data revealed a surprising truth: the single most important factor was not talent, but psychological safety. This finding cemented psychological safety as the ultimate foundation for high-performance.

When psychological safety is high, a team can:

  • Embrace a Learning Mindset: Mistakes are seen as data points for learning, not failures to be punished. This enables rapid iteration and a “fail-fast” culture.
  • Unlock Creativity and Innovation: When people are free from the fear of looking foolish, they are more likely to share unconventional ideas, leading to genuine breakthroughs.
  • Improve Problem-Solving: Team members are more likely to speak up about potential problems, raise red flags, and engage in constructive conflict, allowing the team to address issues before they become crises.
  • Increase Employee Engagement and Retention: People want to work in an environment where they feel valued, respected, and safe. A culture of psychological safety fosters deep loyalty and reduces turnover.

“Talent gets you on the field, but psychological safety is what allows you to win the game.”

Case Study 1: Pixar’s “Braintrust” – A Masterclass in Candor and Trust

The Challenge:

In the high-stakes world of animated filmmaking, a single creative misstep can lead to a disastrous flop. For Pixar, the challenge was to create a mechanism for frank, honest, and even brutal feedback on films in progress without crushing the creative spirit of the director and their team. A typical corporate review process would be too political and hierarchical for the level of candid feedback needed.

The Psychological Safety Solution:

Pixar’s solution was the **Braintrust**, an exclusive group of the company’s most accomplished directors and storytellers. This wasn’t a formal committee; it was a culture built on psychological safety. The core rules of the Braintrust are simple yet powerful: a director is never obligated to act on the feedback, and the group’s purpose is to help the film succeed, not to assert power. The feedback is always on the work, never the person. This deep, shared belief that everyone is there to help and that no one is judging personal worth allowed for a level of open, candid criticism that is almost unheard of in other creative industries. Directors could present their half-finished, deeply flawed films and receive honest input without fear of professional harm.

The Result:

The Braintrust is a key reason for Pixar’s long-term, unprecedented creative success. It is a living testament to the power of psychological safety. By building an environment where candor and vulnerability were not just tolerated but celebrated, Pixar created a collective intelligence that consistently elevated the quality of every film. They proved that honest feedback, delivered with a foundation of trust, is the ultimate driver of creative excellence.

Case Study 2: The Boeing 737 MAX Crisis – The Catastrophic Cost of Silence

The Challenge:

In the years leading up to the two fatal crashes of the Boeing 737 MAX, the company was under immense pressure to compete with Airbus and deliver a new, fuel-efficient aircraft on an aggressive timeline. Internally, a culture of cost-cutting and a rigid, top-down hierarchy created a fear-based environment. Engineers and employees were aware of potential issues with the new flight control software (MCAS), but they felt unable to raise their concerns.

The Psychological Safety Failure:

In this culture of fear, with an emphasis on meeting deadlines at all costs, employees chose silence over speaking up. A damning report by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee found that a lack of psychological safety prevented whistleblowers from coming forward. Engineers felt that raising safety concerns would not only fall on deaf ears but could also lead to retaliation or professional damage. Instead of a collaborative problem-solving approach, the culture fostered a dangerous “don’t ask, don’t tell” mentality. The very people who could have prevented the tragedy were silenced by an environment that prioritized speed and cost over human lives.

The Result:

The absence of psychological safety at Boeing led to one of the most devastating corporate crises in modern history. The two fatal crashes killed 346 people and resulted in a massive financial and reputational blow. The case of the 737 MAX serves as a powerful cautionary tale, demonstrating that a lack of psychological safety is not just a cultural problem; it is a critical strategic risk with potentially catastrophic consequences. It’s a stark reminder that when people are afraid to speak up, the cost can be measured in both lives and livelihoods.

Conclusion: The Ultimate Foundation for Innovation

Psychological safety is not a “nice-to-have” or a buzzword from a corporate retreat. It is the ultimate foundation for building teams that are resilient, adaptable, and ready for anything. It is the soil in which innovation grows, where creativity flourishes, and where people are empowered to be their best, most authentic selves. As leaders, our most important job is not to have all the answers, but to create the environment where our teams feel safe enough to find them together.

In a world of constant change, the ability to learn and evolve is paramount. And learning only happens when we are willing to admit what we don’t know, to experiment without fear of failure, and to speak our minds without fear of judgment. The future belongs to the psychologically safe. Let’s start building it, one conversation and one act of vulnerability at a time.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.






The Power of Psychological Safety

Leave a reply

Building Teams Ready for Anything

The Power of Psychological Safety

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

For decades, we’ve defined high-performing teams by their collective talent, their competitive drive, or their relentless focus on execution. We’ve believed that success is a matter of gathering the smartest people in a room and demanding excellence. But as a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I’ve seen time and again that this model is insufficient for the complexity of our modern world. The most resilient, innovative, and successful teams are not defined by individual brilliance, but by a shared sense of trust and vulnerability. Their secret weapon is a concept known as psychological safety, a foundational element that empowers people to take risks, speak up, and learn from mistakes without fear of judgment or reprisal.

Psychological safety is a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking. In simple terms, it’s the feeling that you can be yourself, ask a “stupid” question, admit a mistake, or propose a wild idea without being shamed, ridiculed, or penalized. This isn’t a “soft” concept; it’s a hard, strategic capability. In a world where change is the only constant, teams must be able to experiment, give and receive honest feedback, and pivot with agility. None of this is possible in a fear-based environment. The human instinct to self-preserve—to avoid looking incompetent—is a powerful force. Without psychological safety, we self-censor, we withhold critical information, and we stick to the known, a sure-fire path to stagnation and irrelevance. Conversely, when psychological safety is high, a team’s collective intelligence soars, and their capacity for innovation becomes limitless.

Cultivating a Culture of Safety: A Leader’s Blueprint

Building psychological safety is a leader’s most important job. It’s not about being “nice”; it’s about being intentional. Here are four essential practices for creating an environment where your team is ready for anything:

  • 1. Frame the Work as a Learning Problem: In a complex world, there is no single right answer. Frame every challenge not just as a task to be executed, but as a hypothesis to be tested. This reframes failure as a source of valuable data and reframes mistakes as essential steps on the path to a solution.
  • 2. Acknowledge Your Own Fallibility: Leaders must go first. When you admit a mistake, say “I don’t know,” or ask for help, you create a powerful permission structure for your team. This vulnerability signals that it’s okay for them to do the same, breaking down the fear of looking incompetent.
  • 3. Practice Inclusive Inquiry: Instead of simply stating your opinion, ask questions. Actively seek out the opinions of quieter team members. Say things like, “What are we missing?” or “I want to hear from someone who disagrees with me.” This signals that diverse perspectives are not just welcome but essential.
  • 4. Respond Constructively to Failure: When a project fails or a mistake is made, your response is everything. Avoid placing blame. Instead, lead with curiosity. Ask, “What did we learn from this?” and “How can we build a system to prevent this from happening again?” This turns a moment of potential crisis into a learning opportunity.

“Talent gets you on the field, but psychological safety is what allows you to win the game.” — Braden Kelley

Case Study 1: Pixar’s “Braintrust” – A Masterclass in Candor

The Challenge:

In the high-stakes world of animated filmmaking, a single creative misstep can lead to a disastrous flop. For Pixar, the challenge was to create a mechanism for frank, honest, and even brutal feedback on films in progress without crushing the creative spirit of the director and their team. A typical corporate review process would be too political and hierarchical for the level of candid feedback needed.

The Psychological Safety Solution:

Pixar’s solution was the Braintrust, an exclusive group of the company’s most accomplished directors and storytellers. This wasn’t a formal committee; it was a culture built on psychological safety. The core rules of the Braintrust are simple yet powerful: a director is never obligated to act on the feedback, and the group’s purpose is to help the film succeed, not to assert power. The feedback is always on the work, never the person. This deep, shared belief that everyone is there to help and that no one is judging personal worth allowed for a level of open, candid criticism that is almost unheard of in other creative industries. Directors could present their half-finished, deeply flawed films and receive honest input without fear of professional harm.

The Result:

The Braintrust is a key reason for Pixar’s long-term, unprecedented creative success. It is a living testament to the power of psychological safety. By building an environment where candor and vulnerability were not just tolerated but celebrated, Pixar created a collective intelligence that consistently elevated the quality of every film. They proved that honest feedback, delivered with a foundation of trust, is the ultimate driver of creative excellence.

Case Study 2: Volkswagen’s “Dieselgate” – The Cost of Silence

The Challenge:

In the years leading up to the “Dieselgate” scandal, Volkswagen was a highly centralized, hierarchical organization with a demanding culture of top-down perfection. Leaders set ambitious, often unrealistic, performance targets. The challenge was to meet a new set of strict emissions standards for their diesel vehicles, a goal that their engineering teams knew was physically impossible to achieve without compromising performance.

The Psychological Safety Failure:

In this fear-based environment, with a rigid emphasis on hierarchy and an intolerance for failure, employees were not psychologically safe to speak up. The engineers knew the emissions targets were unattainable, but they feared professional repercussions—demotion, firing, or public shaming—if they admitted failure. Instead of raising the impossible challenge to senior leadership, they chose to develop and install a “defeat device,” a software program designed to cheat on emissions tests. This was a direct, disastrous consequence of a culture that prioritized looking good over being honest and vulnerable.

The Result:

When the deception was discovered, it led to one of the biggest corporate scandals in history. The financial cost was in the tens of billions of dollars, but the damage to the company’s brand and reputation was incalculable. “Dieselgate” serves as a powerful cautionary tale. It shows that when psychological safety is absent, people will choose silence over speaking the truth, and a single, unaddressed problem can grow into a monumental crisis that threatens the very existence of the organization. It’s proof that a lack of psychological safety is not just a cultural problem; it’s a critical strategic risk.

Conclusion: The Ultimate Foundation for Innovation

Psychological safety is not a “nice-to-have.” It is the ultimate foundation for building teams that are resilient, adaptable, and ready for anything. It is the soil in which innovation grows, where creativity flourishes, and where people are empowered to be their best, most authentic selves. As leaders, our most important job is not to provide all the answers, but to create the environment where our teams feel safe enough to find them together.

In a world of constant change, the ability to learn and evolve is paramount. And learning only happens when we are willing to admit what we don’t know, to experiment without fear of failure, and to speak our minds without fear of judgment. The future belongs to the psychologically safe. Let’s start building it, one conversation and one act of vulnerability at a time.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.






The Role of Psychological Safety in Fostering Innovation

Leave a reply

The Role of Psychological Safety in Fostering Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the rapidly changing world of business, innovation isn’t just encouraged—it’s essential for survival. Yet, fostering an environment where innovation thrives isn’t merely about investing in the latest technology or having creative job titles. At the foundation of sustained innovation lies a crucial and often overlooked factor: psychological safety.

Psychological safety, a term popularized by Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, refers to a team climate characterized by interpersonal trust and mutual respect, where people are comfortable being themselves. In such an environment, team members feel safe to take risks, voice their ideas, and even fail—all without the fear of repercussion or ridicule. Let’s explore the pivotal role psychological safety plays in enhancing innovation potential within organizations, supported by real-world case studies.

The Science of Psychological Safety

Several studies highlight the profound impact of psychological safety on team performance. When team members feel psychologically safe, they are more likely to engage in learning behaviors—seeking feedback, sharing information, experimenting, and discussing mistakes. These behaviors are the bedrock of an innovative culture, fostering environments where breakthroughs happen and improvements are continuous.

“Innovation is fueled by the ability to connect previously unconnected information and ideas. This happens best when people feel comfortable to express their diverse thoughts without fear.” — Braden Kelley

Case Study 1: Google’s Project Aristotle

Google’s Project Aristotle was a comprehensive research initiative to understand what makes teams effective. After studying over 180 teams, Google discerned that the most successful teams shared a common characteristic—psychological safety.

Teams with high levels of psychological safety were not necessarily composed of all-star players. Instead, their success stemmed from encouraging equal speaking opportunities among team members, empathy towards one another, and valuing diversity of thought. These teams were more innovative and productive. Google now emphasizes psychological safety as a cornerstone of its team-building exercises and leadership training, firmly embedding it into their culture.

Case Study 2: Toyota’s Culture of Continuous Improvement

Toyota is renowned for its continuous improvement methodology, known as Kaizen. A significant contributor to the success of this approach is the cultivation of psychological safety within their teams. Toyota encourages its employees to voice their opinions and suggest improvements without the fear of negative consequences. This approach has led to significant innovations and enhancements in their production processes and has positioned Toyota as a leader in quality and efficiency in the automobile industry.

For example, Toyota’s commitment to psychological safety was evident in their assembly line workers’ empowerment. Workers could stop the production line if they identified a problem, so it could be fixed promptly. This policy not only improved overall quality but also reinforced the value of each worker’s input, thereby driving innovation from all levels of the company.

Creating a Psychologically Safe Environment

Launching into this cultural transformation isn’t merely a top-down directive. It involves cultivating a grass-roots shift and embedding psychological safety into the team’s DNA. Here are several strategies organizations can implement to foster a more psychologically safe environment:

1. Encourage Open Communication

Create an atmosphere where team members feel encouraged to share their ideas and opinions without judgment. Regularly solicit feedback and listen actively to what your team has to say.

2. Demonstrate Vulnerability as a Leader

Leaders should model the behavior they wish to see by admitting their own mistakes and uncertainties. This openness can help set a tone that failing and learning are part of the creative process.

3. Normalize Inclusivity and Diversity

Value and harness the diversity of your team by recognizing the variety of perspectives that members bring. Cultivate an inclusive environment where different viewpoints are appreciated and respected.

4. Provide Constructive Feedback

Deliver feedback that is constructive and focused on improvement rather than personal criticism. Encourage a growth mindset where feedback is viewed as a pathway to better performance and innovation.

5. Encourage Experimentation

Create opportunities for your team to try new ideas in a safe environment. Emphasize learning from what doesn’t work as much as from what does.

Conclusion

In a world where innovation is more critical than ever, creating and nurturing psychologically safe environments has proven to be a key enabler of creative and effective teams. By embracing psychological safety, organizations unlock the full potential of their workforce, allowing for the free exchange of ideas, increased engagement, and transformational innovations. When organizations commit to embedding this principle into their culture, they pave the way for sustainable success and groundbreaking advancements.

Let us champion the charge towards psychological safety and make innovation a cornerstone of our work environments, paving the path towards a brighter, more innovative future.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.