Category Archives: Change

Innovation and Transformation Advisory and Connection Opportunity

Leave a reply

Innovation and Transformation Advisory and Connection Opportunity

Braden Kelley has been focusing on human-centered change and innovation for more than twenty years, bringing in elements of design thinking, customer experience, employee experience and digital transformation as needed.

On November 18, 2022 our founder will be in New York City (Midtown Manhattan) and available to connect for any of the following purposes:

  • Private keynote or workshop for your organization

  • Certification session on the Change Planning Toolkit™ and/or FutureHacking™ sets of tools for your team

  • Featured keynote speaker or workshop for a sales event or conference

  • Advisory session to provide input on a specific innovation project or your overall innovation or transformation program

  • Audio or video podcast appearance

  • Grab a coffee or a meal — to connect or reconnect

  • Or, if you think Braden should interview you on camera to join the video interviews he’s done with luminaries like Dean Kamen, Seth Godin, Dan Pink, Roger Martin, Kevin Roberts, and most recently – PepsiCo’s Chief Design Officer Mauro Porcini – Braden will bring his video camera!

If you work in Manhattan or are willing to travel in from elsewhere in the greater New York City metropolitan area (or the world) and are looking to increase the innovation or transformation capabilities of your organization or to de-risk an innovation project by getting an outside perspective, or just to connect, contact Braden to book time on November 18, 2022.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How Stories Drive Transformational Change

Leave a reply

Leading with Narrative

How Stories Drive Transformational Change

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

When faced with the need for transformational change, leaders often turn to the tools they know best: data, strategy, and process. We craft meticulous spreadsheets, present compelling graphs, and outline new organizational structures. We believe that if we can just provide enough logical evidence, people will get on board. But as a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I have seen time and again that this approach is fundamentally incomplete. Data informs, but it is **narrative that inspires**. We are not logical machines; we are storytelling beings. The most successful leaders don’t just manage change; they craft and champion a compelling story that connects with the hearts and minds of their people.

Our brains are wired for stories. When we hear a narrative, our brains light up. We release oxytocin, the “trust hormone,” and we enter a state of engagement and empathy. A well-told story is more memorable, more persuasive, and more emotionally resonant than any data point. It takes a complex, abstract idea—like a new corporate strategy—and makes it personal, tangible, and relatable. A story creates a shared reality and a sense of collective purpose. It turns a group of individuals into a tribe, united by a common journey. Therefore, if you are not leading with a powerful narrative, you are leaving your most potent tool for change on the table.

Crafting a Narrative for Change: The Human-Centered Blueprint

A powerful change narrative isn’t a simple announcement; it’s a carefully constructed journey that positions your team as the heroes. Here’s a blueprint for crafting a story that drives transformation:

  • The “Why” Story (The Call to Adventure): Begin by telling the story of why change is necessary. What is the fundamental problem you are solving? Don’t just show market share declines; tell a story about a frustrated customer whose needs aren’t being met. This emotional “why” is the foundation of your narrative.
  • The “What If” Story (The Vision of a New World): Paint a vivid, aspirational picture of the future. What will life be like for employees, customers, and the world after the change? Use rich details and sensory language. What will your company feel like? What will a customer’s day be like with your new product? Make the future feel tangible and desirable.
  • The “Hero’s Journey” (The Role of Your People): Position your employees as the heroes of the narrative. They are not passive recipients of change; they are the ones who will overcome the obstacles and bring the new world to life. This narrative arc gives them purpose and a sense of ownership, transforming them from resistors into champions.
  • The Power of Anecdotes (Sustaining the Story): A single, powerful story can be more effective than a hundred data points. As the change unfolds, leaders must continuously collect and share stories of small wins, customer triumphs, and individual acts of bravery. These anecdotes keep the narrative alive and provide concrete evidence that the journey is progressing.

“Facts tell, but stories sell. In the business of change, you are not selling a strategy; you are selling a story about a better future.”

Case Study 1: Satya Nadella and the Transformation of Microsoft

The Challenge:

In the early 2010s, Microsoft was a technology giant struggling with a stagnant culture. It was known as an internal “know-it-all” organization, marked by intense competition, siloed business units, and a lack of agility. The company was losing relevance in a world dominated by mobile and cloud computing. The challenge for new CEO Satya Nadella was not just to change the strategy, but to change the very soul of the company.

The Narrative-Driven Solution:

Nadella’s approach was a masterclass in leading with narrative. He didn’t just present a “cloud-first, mobile-first” strategy; he crafted a new story for Microsoft. He shifted the focus from competing with others to **empowering every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more**. This was a profound, human-centered “why” that resonated deeply. He replaced the “know-it-all” culture with a **”learn-it-all”** growth mindset. This narrative repositioned employees from being defenders of a legacy to being explorers of a new future. He used his personal story, his love of poetry, and his focus on empathy to make the narrative feel authentic and deeply human. He constantly reinforced the story with anecdotes of customer successes and internal collaboration.

The Result:

The transformation was a resounding success. The shared narrative of empowerment and the growth mindset fundamentally changed the company’s culture. It broke down silos, fostered collaboration, and unleashed a wave of innovation that led to the creation of products like Microsoft Teams and the explosive growth of Azure. By leading with a new story, Nadella didn’t just change what Microsoft did; he changed who they were, proving that narrative is a powerful lever for the most profound organizational change.

Case Study 2: Southwest Airlines and the Story of the Underdog

The Challenge:

In the 1970s, the airline industry was dominated by large, bureaucratic carriers. A small, upstart airline in Texas, Southwest, faced a monumental challenge. They couldn’t compete on size or resources, so they had to compete on something else. Co-founder Herb Kelleher’s challenge was to inspire a team and a customer base to believe in a new, unconventional way of flying.

The Narrative-Driven Solution:

Kelleher didn’t just create a low-cost airline; he created a powerful narrative. The story of Southwest was that of the **underdog fighting the Goliaths** of the industry. The narrative was centered on rebellion, fun, and common sense. Employees were not just ticket agents or flight attendants; they were the heroes fighting for the everyman, making flying affordable and enjoyable. They were empowered to be funny, to go off-script, and to treat customers like friends. Every internal communication and external advertisement reinforced this core story, from flight attendants in shorts to cheeky taglines.

The Result:

This powerful narrative created a culture of fierce loyalty and an employee base that was so engaged they would go above and beyond to delight customers. The story of the underdog resonated with the public, building a customer community that was fiercely loyal to the brand. Southwest became one of the most consistently profitable airlines in history, not by having the most features, but by having the most compelling story. The narrative of rebellion and fun was the single most powerful tool for attracting talent, retaining customers, and driving a truly unique and successful business model.

Conclusion: The Leader as a Storyteller

In the final analysis, leaders are not just managers of resources; they are guardians of a story. Whether you are leading a team, a department, or an entire organization, your ability to inspire change is directly tied to your ability to articulate a compelling narrative. It is the story that provides context, creates purpose, and forges the emotional connections required for people to take on the difficult journey of change.

So, the next time you are faced with a transformation, put away the spreadsheets and data for a moment. Instead, ask yourself: What story are we telling? What is our “why”? What does the new world look like? And who are the heroes who will bring it to life? The most powerful and enduring transformations are built not on logic, but on the enduring and timeless magic of a great story.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of October 2022

Leave a reply

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of October 2022Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are October’s ten most popular innovation posts:

  1. Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Reality — by Braden Kelley

  2. How Do You Judge Innovation: Guilty or Innocent? — by Robyn Bolton

  3. Scaling New Heights – Building Resilience — by Teresa Spangler

  4. What Great Transformational Leaders Learn from Their Failures — by Greg Satell

  5. Your Brand Isn’t the Problem — by Mike Shipulski

  6. What’s Next – Through the Looking Glass — by Braden Kelley

  7. Don’t Blame Quiet Quitting for a Broken Business Strategy — by Soren Kaplan

  8. The Ways Inflection Points Define Our Future — by Greg Satell

  9. How to Use TikTok for Marketing Your Business — by Shep Hyken

  10. Making Innovation the Way We Do Business (easy as ABC) — by Robyn Bolton

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in September that continue to resonate with people:

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last two years:

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

3 Mind-Blowing Things I Learned in Nebraska

Leave a reply

3 Mind-Blowing Things I Learned in Nebraska

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

In the Before Times, we attended conferences to learn, make connections, and promote ourselves and our businesses. Then COVID hit, and conferences became virtual.   Although that made them easier to attend, it also made them easier to skip. Because, if we’re honest, most conferences were more about connecting and promoting than learning.

Last week, I went to one of those rare, almost mythical, conferences more focused on learning and connecting than promoting. It was fantastic! It was also in Nebraska (which is a pretty interesting place, btw).

Here are my three biggest mind-blowing takeaways from Inside Outside’s IO2022 Summit:

“Strategy is the direction you take to win in the future”

Kareen Proudian, Managing Partner at Faculty of Change

It’s a bit embarrassing to admit, but if you asked me to define “Strategy,” I’d respond with a long and rambling answer. Which means I can’t define “strategy.”  This admission is especially embarrassing because I have a resume littered with places where I developed, drafted, and implemented strategies, so I should have learned what the word means. But nope, I didn’t.

I suspect I’m not alone.

Asking for the definition of strategy is like asking if you must wear clothes to the office. You should know the answer. But unlike whether or not clothing is mandatory, most of us don’t know the answer, AND it’s easy to get away with never knowing the answer.

The elegant simplicity of Kareen’s definition of strategy blew my mind. It’s short, memorable, and something that most people can understand. Maybe I should share the definition with my alma maters and past employers.

“When we feel threatened, our IQ drops 50 to 70 points”

Alla Weinberg, CEO at Spoke & Wheel

When I first heard talk about Psychological Safety and Safe Spaces in today’s business world, I rolled my eyes. Hard. As a Gen X-er, I grumbled about how we didn’t need “safe spaces” when I grew up because we were tough and self-reliant, and I lamented the inevitable downfall of society caused by weak and coddled Millennials.

I was wrong.

Psychological Safety is absolutely and unquestionably essential for individuals to grow, teams to work, companies to operate and innovate, and societies to function and evolve. I’ve seen teams and businesses transform and achieve unbelievable success by discussing and living the elements they require for Psychological Safety. I’ve also seen teams and businesses fail in its absence.

These results aren’t surprising when you realize that you feel threatened when you are in a complex situation in which you cannot accurately predict the outcomes. And when you feel threatened, you are half as intelligent, effective, and creative as you are when you’re calm.

So, if you’re a manager and you’re upset that your people aren’t as intelligent, effective, or creative as they should be, it may not be their fault. It may be yours.

“Stage expertise, not industry expertise, is key to innovation success”

Sean Sheppard, Managing Partner at U+

There is deep comfort in the known. It’s why we gravitate to people like us. It’s also why companies ask job candidates and consultants about their experience in the industry and choose those with deep experience and impressive expertise. Often, there’s nothing with this question or the resulting decision.

Sometimes, it’s precisely the wrong question.

Sometimes, functional expertise is significantly more important than industry experience. After all, if you’re the hiring manager at a healthcare company looking for a Director of Finance, who would you hire – a Marketing Director from a competitor or a Finance Director from a CPG company?

That’s the case with innovation.

Decades of real-world experience (not to mention the successful launch of 100+ startups) show that successful corporate startup teams had expertise (mindsets, skillsets, executional drive) in the startup’s phase and a working knowledge of the industry rather extensive industry expertise and little to no innovation experience.

Questions are good. The right questions are better. So, the next time you’re staffing up an innovation team (or hiring a consultant), choose based on their innovation experience and willingness to learn about your industry.

Innovation happens everywhere

That’s why people from San Francisco, Austin, Washington DC, NYC, Toronto, Boston, and dozens of other places converged on Lincoln, Nebraska.

We went to see innovation in action and learn about the thriving startup community in the middle of the country. We also went to learn and connect with others committed to creating new things that create value.

Getting our minds blown was a bonus.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Spotting Frauds and Hucksters

1 Reply

Spotting Frauds and Hucksters

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

Within hours of planes crashing into the World Trade Center on 9-11, stories began circulating that it was not, in fact, the planes that caused the towers to collapse, but explosives planted inside by someone with access. Since then, a number of conspiracy theories have circulated that people ranging from government employees to Wall Street Traders were responsible for the attack.

So, it shouldn’t be surprising that there is no shortage of alleged schemes about the coronavirus epidemic, from theories that the disease is caused by 5G mobile networks to that Bill Gates cooked it up as part of a global plot to electronically track us through vaccinations. Even the president’s son has a pet theory.

The simple truth is that when a tragic event happens, we lose our sense of control and there will never be a shortage of hucksters willing to take advantage of that, for profit or for other reasons. Often, these are elaborate narratives and can seem very convincing. Yet the schemes tend to have common characteristics which we can use to spot and nullify their effect.

Questionable Credentials

The first and most obvious thing most fraudulent conspiracy theories have in common is questionable credentials. Credentials, like a professional degree or certification, are important because they show that someone’s expertise has been recognized by other experts in a specific field of endeavor and that person has subjected themselves to evaluation.

That doesn’t mean someone has to have a piece of paper for their ideas to matter. In fact, as Thomas Kuhn pointed out decades ago, it is often outsiders, like Richard Feynman in virology and Elon Musk in space exploration, who drive paradigm shifts in a particular domain. However, in those cases, the outsiders are almost always working in conjunction with recognized experts.

Of course, the hucksters understand the importance of credentials, so they use several ploys to confuse us. They often appear in videos in white lab coats and use scientific sounding words. Like a cargo cult, they adopt the appearance and forms of a scientific method but discard the substance. Often, they will point to the lack of acceptance by “the establishment” as proof that their ideas are so important, they are being silenced.

So, the first thing we should look at is the credentials of the person or people making the claim. Lacking credentials doesn’t immediately make you wrong and having them doesn’t necessarily make you right. Nevertheless, when someone is unwilling to accept some type of training and evaluation it should put us on our guard.

A Lack of Transparency

Real science is transparent. There are no trade secrets. You are providing information on your materials and methods as well as the data that results. The idea is that you want to give everybody all of the information they would need to question your conclusions and judge the value of what you profess to be contributing.

Conspiracy theorists don’t do this. That’s why YouTube is a favorite medium. It’s so hard to fact check. You aren’t expected to provide links or data in an appendix to a video. You can just make assertions set to dramatic music. You can flash images that suggest nefarious activities without making any real assertions.

Another favorite ploy of the hucksters is to point to the lack of data as proof of the importance of their ideas. Of course, they don’t have data! That’s part of the cover up! So, they refuse to give any real proof and try to bury you in false assertions. They shift the burden of proof to anybody who questions them. Can anybody prove the data doesn’t exist?

We want to constantly ask ourselves, “Is this person giving me all the information I would need to come to a different conclusion? Is he or she open to different interpretations of the same data?”

A Persecution Complex

While researching my book, Mapping Innovation, I interviewed dozens of top innovators. Some were world class scientists and engineers. Others were high level executives at large corporations. Still others were highly successful entrepreneurs. Overall, it was a pretty intimidating group.

So, I was surprised to find that, with few exceptions, they were some of the kindest and most generous people I have ever met. The behavior was so consistent that I felt that it couldn’t be an accident. So, I began to research the matter further and found that, to a surprising extent, generosity can be a competitive advantage.

One particular case that comes to mind is Jim Allison, who had his idea for curing cancer rejected by the establishment. The pain was apparent in his voice even 20 years after the fact. Yet he didn’t blame anybody. He tried to understand why people were skeptical, went back and further validated his data, pounded the pavement and kept advocating for his idea. Jim won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2018.

Conspiracy theorists, on the other hand, often go to great lengths to explain how they have been silenced by the establishment and say this is proof of the importance of their ideas. They ascribe malevolent motives to those who disagree with them. For them, there is no such thing as honest dissent.

Have You Ever Seen a Humble Conspiracy Theorist?

One thing that always impressed me about the innovators I researched was how they insisted on giving credit to others. This came through especially during fact checks, when they would insist, I note the contributions of their collaborators. They never claim that they did it all themselves.

The people who make the biggest breakthroughs aren’t necessarily smarter or harder working than anybody else. However, they are effective knowledge brokers who build up strong networks of collaborators. They don’t always know more, but they know who knows more and that helps them to access that random piece of knowledge or insight that allows them to crack a really tough problem.

Yet conspiracy theorists would have us believe that they possess, by either innate ability or opportunity, some unique insight that others are not privy to. They don’t invite collaboration, scrutiny or alternate perspectives because they believe they are already possessing the absolute truth.

We need to have a healthy skepticism, especially with ideas we would tend to agree with. We should ask questions, explore alternative explanations of the same data and be open to additional evidence. What we need to look out for are people who would suggest that we shouldn’t do these things, because they are the ones looking to deceive us.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

AI-Powered Foresight

Leave a reply

Predicting Trends and Uncovering New Opportunities

AI-Powered Foresight

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world of accelerating change, the ability to see around corners is no longer a luxury; it’s a strategic imperative. For decades, organizations have relied on traditional market research, analyst reports, and expert intuition to predict the future. While these methods provide a solid view of the present and the immediate horizon, they often struggle to detect the faint, yet potent, signals of a more distant future. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I believe that **Artificial Intelligence is the most powerful new tool for foresight**. AI is not here to replace human intuition, but to act as a powerful extension of it, allowing us to process vast amounts of data and uncover patterns that are invisible to the human eye. The future of innovation isn’t about predicting what’s next; it’s about systematically sensing and shaping what’s possible. AI is the engine that makes this possible.

The human brain is a marvel of pattern recognition, but it is limited by its own biases, a finite amount of processing power, and the sheer volume of information available today. AI, however, thrives in this chaos. It can ingest and analyze billions of data points—from consumer sentiment on social media, to patent filings, to macroeconomic indicators—in a fraction of the time. It can identify subtle correlations and weak signals that, when combined, point to a major market shift years before it becomes a mainstream trend. By leveraging AI for foresight, we can move from a reactive position to a proactive one, turning our organizations from followers into first-movers.

The AI Foresight Blueprint

Leveraging AI for foresight isn’t a one-and-done task; it’s a continuous, dynamic process. Here’s a blueprint for how organizations can implement it:

  • Data-Driven Horizon Scanning: Use AI to continuously monitor a wide range of data sources, from academic papers and startup funding rounds to online forums and cultural movements. An AI can flag anomalies and emerging clusters of activity that fall outside of your industry’s current focus.
  • Pattern Recognition & Trend Identification: AI models can connect seemingly unrelated data points to identify nascent trends. For example, an AI might link a rise in plant-based food searches to an increase in sustainable packaging patents and a surge in home gardening interest, pointing to a larger “Conscious Consumer” trend.
  • Scenario Generation: Once a trend is identified, an AI can help generate multiple future scenarios. By varying key variables—e.g., “What if the trend accelerates rapidly?” or “What if a major competitor enters the market?”—an AI can help teams visualize and prepare for a range of possible futures.
  • Opportunity Mapping: AI can go beyond trend prediction to identify specific market opportunities. It can analyze the intersection of an emerging trend with a known customer pain point, generating a list of potential product or service concepts that address an unmet need.

“AI for foresight isn’t about getting a crystal ball; it’s about building a powerful telescope to see what’s on the horizon and a microscope to see what’s hidden in the data.”

Case Study 1: Stitch Fix – Algorithmic Personal Styling

The Challenge:

In the crowded and highly subjective world of fashion retail, predicting what a single customer will want to wear—let alone an entire market segment—is a monumental challenge. Traditional methods relied on seasonal buying patterns and the intuition of human stylists. This often led to excess inventory and a high rate of returns.

The AI-Powered Foresight Response:

Stitch Fix, the online personal styling service, built its entire business model on AI-powered foresight. The company’s core innovation was not in fashion, but in its algorithm. The AI ingests data from every single customer interaction—what they kept, what they returned, their style feedback, and even their Pinterest boards. This data is then cross-referenced with a vast inventory and emerging fashion trends. The AI can then:

  • Predict Individual Preference: The algorithm learns each customer’s taste over time, predicting with high accuracy which items they will like. This is a form of micro-foresight.
  • Uncover Macro-Trends: By analyzing thousands of data points across its customer base, the AI can detect emerging fashion trends long before they hit the mainstream. For example, it might notice a subtle shift in the popularity of a certain color, fabric, or cut among its early adopters.

The Result:

Stitch Fix’s AI-driven foresight has allowed them to operate with a level of efficiency and personalization that is nearly impossible for traditional retailers to replicate. By predicting consumer demand, they can optimize their inventory, reduce waste, and provide a highly-tailored customer experience. The AI doesn’t just help them sell clothes; it gives them a real-time, data-backed view of future consumer behavior, making them a leader in a fast-moving and unpredictable industry.

Case Study 2: Netflix – The Algorithm That Sees the Future of Entertainment

The Challenge:

In the early days of streaming, content production was a highly risky and expensive gamble. Studios would greenlight shows based on the intuition of executives, focus group data, and the past success of a director or actor. This process was slow and often led to costly failures.

The AI-Powered Foresight Response:

Netflix, a pioneer of AI-powered foresight, revolutionized this model. They used their massive trove of user data—what people watched, when they watched it, what they re-watched, and what they skipped—to predict not just what their customers wanted to watch, but what kind of content would be successful to produce. When they decided to create their first original series, House of Cards, they didn’t do so on a hunch. Their AI analyzed that a significant segment of their audience had a high affinity for the original British series, enjoyed films starring Kevin Spacey, and had a preference for political thrillers directed by David Fincher. The AI identified the convergence of these three seemingly unrelated data points as a major opportunity.

  • Predictive Content Creation: The algorithm predicted that a show with these specific attributes would have a high probability of success, a hypothesis that was proven correct.
  • Cross-Genre Insight: The AI’s ability to see patterns across genres and user demographics allowed Netflix to move beyond traditional content silos and identify new, commercially viable niches.

The Result:

Netflix’s success with House of Cards was a watershed moment that proved the power of AI-powered foresight. By using data to inform its creative decisions, Netflix was able to move from a content distributor to a powerful content creator. The company now uses AI to inform everything from production budgets to marketing campaigns, transforming the entire entertainment industry and proving that a data-driven approach to creativity is not only possible but incredibly profitable. Their foresight wasn’t a lucky guess; it was a systematic, AI-powered process.

Conclusion: The Augmented Innovator

The era of “gut-feel” innovation is drawing to a close. The most successful organizations of the future will be those that have embraced a new model of augmented foresight, where human intuition and AI’s analytical power work in harmony. AI can provide the objective, data-backed foundation for our predictions, but it is up to us, as human leaders, to provide the empathy, creativity, and ethical judgment to turn those predictions into a better future.

AI is not here to tell you what to do; it’s here to show you what’s possible. Our role is to ask the right questions, to lead with a strong sense of purpose, and to have the courage to act on the opportunities that AI uncovers. By training our teams to listen to the whispers in the data and to trust in this new collaborative process, we can move from simply reacting to the future to actively creating it, one powerful insight at a time.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Microsoft CoPilot

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Building a Culture of Purposeful Innovation

Leave a reply

Engaging Hearts and Minds

Building a Culture of Purposeful Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the high-stakes game of corporate strategy, innovation is often treated as a pure business function. We measure it with metrics like Return on Innovation Investment, patent counts, and new product launches. We manage it with processes, frameworks, and a sterile, bottom-line focus. While these tools are certainly necessary, they are far from sufficient. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I am here to argue that the most transformative, lasting, and impactful innovation isn’t just about what you create; it’s about why you create it. The future belongs to organizations that have successfully engaged the hearts and minds of their employees and customers by building a culture of purposeful innovation.

Purposeful innovation is the strategic integration of a company’s mission and values into every stage of the innovation process. It moves beyond simply solving a market problem to solving a human problem—one that resonates with a deeper sense of meaning and social impact. When innovation is driven by purpose, it stops being a task and starts being a calling. It elevates the work from a mere job to a meaningful contribution, which in turn unlocks a level of passion, commitment, and creativity that no financial incentive alone can ever generate.

The Three Pillars of Purposeful Innovation

Building a culture of purposeful innovation requires a shift in mindset and a commitment to three core pillars:

  • 1. A Shared “Why”: The first step is to clearly articulate and communicate the organization’s purpose. This isn’t just a mission statement on a wall; it’s a living, breathing set of values that guides every decision. Leaders must connect the day-to-day work of innovation to this larger purpose, helping every employee see how their contributions make a difference in the world.
  • 2. Human-Centered Empathy: Purposeful innovation is rooted in a deep understanding of human needs, not just market trends. It requires teams to move beyond data points and financial models to truly empathize with the people they serve. This involves engaging with customers, listening to their frustrations, and understanding their aspirations.
  • 3. Measurable Impact: While purposeful innovation isn’t just about profit, it is not an exercise in altruism without results. The most successful organizations measure their innovation not just in terms of revenue, but also in terms of social, environmental, or human impact. This dual-purpose metric provides a more holistic view of success and reinforces the “why” for the entire organization.

“Profit is not a purpose; it’s a result. When a company’s purpose is to improve lives, profit naturally follows as a measure of the value it has created.”

Case Study 1: Patagonia – The Purpose-Driven Pioneer

The Challenge:

For decades, the outdoor apparel industry was driven by a focus on performance and profit. Patagonia, a brand that began with rock-climbing gear, faced the challenge of competing in a crowded market without compromising its core values. Their “why” was not just to sell products, but to save our home planet.

The Purposeful Innovation Response:

Patagonia has integrated its purpose into every aspect of its business, making innovation a means to an end. Instead of innovating just for new features, they innovate for sustainability. For example, their Worn Wear program is a brilliant example of purposeful innovation. Instead of encouraging consumers to buy new products, they actively encourage them to repair, reuse, and recycle their gear. This program is not just a marketing gimmick; it is a fundamental part of their business model that directly aligns with their environmental purpose.

  • The Innovation: The Worn Wear program, which includes repair services, a marketplace for used gear, and a fleet of repair trucks.
  • The Purpose: To reduce consumption and keep products in use for longer, directly contributing to their mission of environmental stewardship.
  • The Impact: The program has reduced the company’s environmental footprint, built an incredibly loyal customer base, and created a new revenue stream, proving that doing good can also be good for business.

The Result:

Patagonia’s purposeful innovation has made it a leader in its industry and a gold standard for purpose-driven brands. By consistently aligning their business decisions with their core values, they have built an unshakeable level of trust and loyalty with their customers. Their innovation isn’t just about creating a new jacket; it’s about creating a better world, and their employees are deeply engaged in that mission.

Case Study 2: TOMS – The “One for One” Model

The Challenge:

In the early 2000s, TOMS Shoes entered a highly competitive footwear market. The challenge was not just to create a comfortable and stylish shoe, but to stand out in a way that resonated with a new generation of socially conscious consumers. Their “why” was to create a business that could address a social problem at its core.

The Purposeful Innovation Response:

TOMS’s innovation was not in its product design, but in its business model. They pioneered the “One for One” model, a simple yet powerful purpose statement: for every pair of shoes purchased, a pair would be given to a child in need. This model became the brand’s primary reason for being and the engine of its growth.

  • The Innovation: A direct-to-consumer business model that intertwined sales with social impact.
  • The Purpose: To provide shoes and, later, other essential goods (like clean water and eye care) to people in developing nations.
  • The Impact: The model has resulted in millions of pairs of shoes being given away and has inspired countless other companies to adopt similar social impact models. It engaged not only customers but also employees who felt a deep sense of purpose and pride in their work.

The Result:

TOMS’s success proves that a powerful purpose can be the ultimate engine for innovation and brand loyalty. By making its social mission the central focus of its business, TOMS created a community of customers and employees who were not just buying a product, but participating in a movement. While the company has faced challenges and evolved its model, its legacy as a pioneer of purposeful innovation remains a powerful case study for any organization looking to connect its work to a higher purpose.

Conclusion: The Future is Purpose-Driven

In a world where products are increasingly commoditized and customer attention is a fleeting commodity, a strong purpose is the ultimate differentiator. It is the north star that guides innovation, inspires loyalty, and engages every member of an organization, from the leadership team to the newest employee. Purpose is not a nice-to-have; it is a strategic imperative for long-term growth and resilience.

Leaders must stop treating purpose as a standalone initiative and start embedding it into the very DNA of their innovation process. We must empower our teams to ask not just “What should we build?” but “Why does this matter?” By engaging the hearts and minds of our people and connecting their daily work to a meaningful cause, we will not only unlock unprecedented levels of creativity and passion but also build a better world in the process. The era of purposeful innovation is here, and it is the only path to a future that is both profitable and profoundly human.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: 1 of 950+ FREE quote slides available at http://misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Why We Resist Change and How to Overcome It

Leave a reply

Deconstructing Fear

Why We Resist Change and How to Overcome It

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In every organization, the journey of change and innovation is met with a familiar, often unspoken, adversary: fear. We label it as resistance, inertia, or a lack of buy-in. We try to overcome it with data, process flowcharts, and top-down mandates. But as a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I’ve seen that these approaches often fail because they don’t address the root cause. We resist change not because we’re stubborn or lazy, but because we are fundamentally wired to find comfort in the known and to view the unknown with apprehension. Fear is the primary reason we resist change, and until we deconstruct and address it, our best-laid plans for innovation will be met with resistance.

Our brains are built to seek patterns, create routines, and predict outcomes. This evolutionary hardwiring has served us well, allowing us to conserve cognitive energy and navigate our world efficiently. However, in today’s environment of rapid technological and market disruption, this same wiring becomes a liability. Change shatters our routines and forces us into a state of cognitive overload. It introduces risk, uncertainty, and a loss of control. To inspire change, we must stop treating people like cogs in a machine and start treating them like the human beings they are, acknowledging their fears and creating a safe path forward.

The Four Faces of Fear in a Changing World

Resistance to change isn’t a monolith. It manifests in different forms, and understanding these “faces” is the first step to overcoming them:

  • Fear of the Unknown: This is the most fundamental fear. People are not afraid of change itself; they are afraid of what they don’t know about the change. What will my job look like? Will I be able to learn the new system? Will I be relevant? This uncertainty creates anxiety and a powerful desire to cling to the status quo.
  • Fear of Incompetence: Change often requires new skills. An employee who was an expert in the old system suddenly feels like a novice. This can trigger feelings of inadequacy and a fear of being exposed or replaced. It’s a threat to their professional identity and self-worth.
  • Fear of Losing Control: When a change is imposed from the top down, employees can feel powerless. They lose their sense of autonomy and agency, which can breed resentment and passive resistance. This is particularly true when they are not consulted or included in the decision-making process.
  • Fear of Failure and Retribution: Innovation and change require experimentation and a willingness to fail. But in many corporate cultures, failure is punished. Employees are hesitant to embrace new processes or ideas if they believe a mistake could lead to negative consequences for their career or reputation.

“You can’t mandate courage, but you can create an environment where it’s safe to be brave.”

Overcoming Fear with a Human-Centered Approach

To lead people through change, we must replace fear with a sense of safety, purpose, and empowerment. Here’s how to do it:

  1. Increase Transparency and Communication: Proactively and consistently communicate about the “why” and “what” of the change. Address the unknown by providing as much information as possible. Share the vision, the goals, and the benefits of the new path.
  2. Invest in New Skills (Address Incompetence): Provide training, mentorship, and continuous learning opportunities. Show employees that you are invested in their future and that you will give them the tools to succeed. Celebrate the learning process, not just the end result.
  3. Empower and Co-create (Restore Control): Involve employees in the change process. Ask for their input, solicit their ideas, and give them a voice in how the change is implemented. When people have a hand in creating the future, they are far more likely to embrace it.
  4. Create Psychological Safety (Reduce Fear of Failure): Leaders must actively create a culture where it’s safe to experiment and fail. Acknowledge that mistakes will happen. Celebrate the learning that comes from failure and show, through your actions, that risk-taking is a valued part of the process.

Case Study 1: The IBM Mainframe to Cloud Transition

The Challenge:

In the late 2000s, IBM faced a monumental challenge. Its core business was built on decades of expertise in mainframes and legacy IT infrastructure. However, the market was rapidly shifting to cloud computing and open-source solutions. The company needed its engineers—many of whom had spent their entire careers working with legacy systems—to embrace an entirely new technology stack. This was met with significant resistance, a mix of the fear of the unknown and the fear of incompetence.

The Fear-Deconstructing Approach:

Instead of a top-down mandate, IBM’s leadership created a systematic, human-centered approach to reskilling. They invested billions of dollars in a massive educational initiative, partnering with online learning platforms and universities. The key was not just providing courses, but also:

  • A Sense of Security: They made it clear that their existing workforce was their greatest asset and that the goal was to reskill, not replace.
  • Empowerment: They gave employees the autonomy to choose their own learning paths based on their interests and career goals.
  • Peer-to-Peer Learning: They fostered an internal culture where new knowledge was shared and celebrated, turning learning into a collaborative, non-threatening experience.

The Result:

By directly addressing the fears of incompetence and the unknown, IBM successfully reskilled thousands of employees. They transformed their workforce from a legacy-focused team into one capable of building a multi-billion-dollar cloud services business. They didn’t just tell their people to change; they gave them the tools, the purpose, and the psychological safety to do so, turning a potential liability into their greatest asset.

Case Study 2: The Nordstrom Digital Transformation

The Challenge:

Nordstrom, a storied retail company known for its exceptional in-store customer service, had to pivot to compete in an e-commerce-dominated world. The shift required store employees—who were masters of in-person interactions—to embrace technology, digital tools, and a more data-driven approach. The core challenge was not technological, but cultural: convincing a workforce whose identity was tied to the physical store to embrace a digital future without losing their human touch.

The Fear-Deconstructing Approach:

Nordstrom’s leadership understood the deep-seated fear of losing control and the fear that technology would dehumanize their legendary service. They addressed this by:

  • Co-creating the New Vision: They actively involved store employees in the development of new digital tools. Employees provided feedback on everything from the new point-of-sale system to the mobile apps, giving them a sense of ownership.
  • Highlighting the “Why”: Leaders communicated that technology was not a replacement for their human-centered service, but an enabler. The tools were designed to free up time from administrative tasks so employees could spend more time with customers, reinforcing their core identity.
  • Celebrating Small Wins: They rolled out changes incrementally and celebrated every successful pilot, showing employees that the new approach was working and that their input was valuable.

The Result:

Nordstrom’s digital transformation was successful because they didn’t just implement new technology; they led a cultural shift. By deconstructing the fear of change and empowering their employees as co-creators, they built a hybrid model where technology and human service work in harmony. The in-store employees became powerful ambassadors for the digital tools, proving that when you address the human element, even the most daunting change can be embraced as an opportunity for growth.

Conclusion: Leading with Empathy

Change is inevitable, but resistance is not. The most effective leaders are not those who force change upon their people, but those who guide them through it with empathy and understanding. By deconstructing the fears that fuel resistance—the fears of the unknown, of incompetence, of losing control, and of failure—we can create an environment where change is not a threat but a shared adventure.

The next time you face resistance to an innovation, stop and ask a different set of questions. What are my people afraid of? How can I give them more control? How can I make it safe for them to learn? By leading with a human-centered approach, we can move beyond simply managing change and start inspiring it, one courageous step at a time.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Hero’s Journey of Innovation

Leave a reply

Inspiring Your Team to Embrace the Unknown

The Hero's Journey of Innovation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Every great innovation, like every great story, begins with a choice: to stay in the comfortable, known world or to answer the call to adventure and venture into the unknown. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I’ve seen countless organizations struggle with this fundamental challenge. We often focus on the mechanics of innovation — the processes, the tools, the metrics — but we fail to address the most critical element: the human spirit. To truly innovate, we must stop seeing it as a predictable business process and start seeing it as a hero’s journey, a narrative arc that inspires, empowers, and guides our teams through the uncertainty and risk required to create something new.

The Hero’s Journey, a concept popularized by mythologist Joseph Campbell, describes a universal narrative pattern found in countless stories, from ancient myths to modern blockbusters. It involves a hero who leaves their ordinary world, confronts trials and tribulations, gains new knowledge, and returns transformed. This framework is not just for fiction; it is a powerful metaphor for the human experience of change and growth. By re-framing the innovation process through this lens, we can transform it from a daunting, risky endeavor into a compelling adventure that people are excited to embark on.

The Innovation Journey: A Modern Myth

Let’s map the stages of the hero’s journey onto the innovation process to understand how we can better lead our teams:

  • The Ordinary World (The Status Quo): This is your company’s comfort zone—the familiar products, processes, and market position. It feels safe, but it’s also where stagnation begins. The hero (your innovator or team) is living in this world, and for a time, it feels good.
  • The Call to Adventure (The New Idea): A new market trend, a customer pain point, or a disruptive technology emerges. This is the call, the first glimmer of an opportunity to do something different. It is often met with resistance and fear.
  • Refusal of the Call (The Resistance): This is the most common stage. The team hesitates, citing risks, budget constraints, or a lack of resources. The “we’ve always done it this way” mindset is a powerful force of gravity. Leaders must recognize and address this fear head-on.
  • Meeting the Mentor (The Leader’s Role): This is where you, as the leader, step in. You are the mentor who provides guidance, psychological safety, and the tools needed to start the journey. You don’t have all the answers, but you offer wisdom, support, and the courage to take the first step.
  • Crossing the Threshold (The First Step): The team commits to the project. This is the moment they leave the comfort zone. It could be launching a small pilot project, building a prototype, or securing initial funding. This is where the risk becomes real, and the journey truly begins.
  • Tests, Allies, and Enemies (The Innovation Process): This is the long middle part of the journey. The team faces challenges—technical hurdles, budget cuts, internal skepticism, and market feedback. They also find allies—champions within the organization, external partners, and supportive customers.
  • The Ordeal (The Crisis): Every innovation journey has a moment of crisis—a failed prototype, a critical negative review, a major competitor launch. This is the low point, where the team’s resolve is tested. This is where resilience is built.
  • The Reward (The First Success): After the ordeal, a breakthrough occurs. A successful pilot, a positive beta test, or a critical finding. This is the hero’s reward, the moment of validation that fuels the rest of the journey.
  • The Road Back (The Scaling): The hero must now return to the ordinary world, but they are not the same. They must scale their innovation, integrate it into the business, and convince the rest of the organization of its value.
  • The Resurrection (The Big Launch): The final test. The public launch, the full-scale rollout. It is the culmination of the journey, where the innovation is either reborn as a new product or fails to make its mark.
  • Return with the Elixir (The New Normal): The hero returns, bringing with them a new product, a new process, or a new way of thinking. The organization is forever changed. The hero, and the team, have learned valuable lessons and are ready for the next adventure.

“An innovation culture isn’t built on a process flowchart; it’s built on a shared narrative of courage, resilience, and transformation.”

Case Study 1: The Pixar Journey from Toy Story to a Studio

The Challenge:

In the early 1990s, Pixar was a small computer graphics company with a radical idea: to create the world’s first feature-length film entirely with CGI. This was a monumental risk. They were leaving the “ordinary world” of short films and commercials for the unknown world of feature animation, competing with titans like Disney. The “Call to Adventure” was clear, but the “Refusal of the Call” was a powerful force from Hollywood and even within their own company, who doubted the technology’s ability to tell a compelling story.

The Heroic Innovation:

Pixar’s leaders acted as mentors, providing a clear vision and psychological safety for the team. The “Crossing the Threshold” was the initial investment and the start of production. The “Tests and Ordeals” were numerous—technical challenges (rendering a single frame took hours), a near-catastrophic script rewrite, and a constant battle to prove the viability of their approach. But they had allies in Steve Jobs and a dedicated team who saw the vision. The “Reward” was the first successful test screening, and the “Resurrection” was the theatrical release of *Toy Story*.

The Result:

The success of *Toy Story* was not just a commercial win; it was a testament to a heroic innovation journey. It proved that a team, when guided by a compelling narrative and a resilient leadership, could overcome seemingly impossible obstacles. The “Elixir” they returned with was not just a successful film, but a new model for animation and a creative culture that continues to define the industry. The journey transformed them from a tech company into a storytelling powerhouse.

Case Study 2: The Dyson Story – A Relentless Pursuit of an Idea

The Challenge:

In the 1980s, the vacuum cleaner market was a comfortable, established world dominated by large corporations and bag-based technology. James Dyson’s “Call to Adventure” was a simple observation: vacuum cleaners lose suction because their bags clog with dust. His idea for a bagless, cyclone-based vacuum was a radical departure, a clear challenge to the status quo that was met with widespread “Refusal of the Call” from every major manufacturer who dismissed the idea as commercially unviable.

The Heroic Innovation:

Dyson’s personal journey is a powerful example of the hero’s arc. He acted as his own mentor, and his lab became the “Unknown World.” The “Ordeals” were legendary: 5,127 failed prototypes over five years, countless rejections from manufacturers, and a constant struggle for funding. His “Allies” were his family and a few dedicated engineers. The “Reward” was the successful creation of the first Dual Cyclone vacuum. The “Resurrection” was its launch in Japan, followed by its triumphant return to the UK market.

The Result:

Dyson didn’t just innovate a new product; he innovated an entire industry. His “Elixir” was not just a successful vacuum cleaner, but a new design philosophy built on relentless experimentation and a refusal to accept the status quo. His story proves that a single-minded pursuit of a new idea, when framed as a heroic journey, can overcome immense odds and redefine an entire market, inspiring an entire generation of innovators to follow their own calls to adventure.

Conclusion: Lead the Journey, Don’t Just Manage the Process

The future belongs to the organizations that can consistently and courageously innovate. And to do that, we must move beyond the sterile, process-driven view of innovation and embrace it as a heroic journey. As leaders, our role is to act as mentors and guides. We must frame the challenges not as roadblocks, but as trials. We must celebrate the small victories as rewards and offer support during the darkest moments of the ordeal.

By telling a compelling story about the change we are trying to create, we can inspire our teams to step out of their ordinary worlds and into the unknown. We can transform fear into courage, hesitation into action, and failure into a source of valuable learning. The journey is difficult, but the rewards—a transformed organization and a team of true innovators—are immeasurable. It’s time to stop managing innovation and start leading the adventure.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Three HOW MIGHT WE Alternatives That Actually Spark Creative Ideas

2 Replies

Three How Might We Alternatives That Actually Spark Creative Ideas

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

Q: How might we brainstorm new ideas to serve our customers better?

A: Have a brainstorming session that starts with “How Might We help customers [Job to be Done/problem]?”

If only it were that simple.

How Might We (HMW) is an incredible tool (not BS, as some would assert), but we misuse it. We focus too much on the “we” and not enough on the “might.”

Might > We

HMW was first used to prompt people to be “wildly creative while simultaneously leveraging [company’s] innate strengths.”

IDEO popularized the prompt as a way to solve “wicked problems” – problems so complex that there is no right or wrong answer.

In both of these cases, the assumption was that the word “might” would free people from the shackles of today’s thinking and constraints and give people permission to dream without fear of judgment and reality.

“We” kept ideas tethered to the reality of the company’s “innate strengths,” providing a modicum of comfort to executives worried that the session wouldn’t result in anything useful and would, therefore, be a waste of time.

We > Might

Alas, as time went on and HMW became more popular, we lost sight of its intent (prompt wildly creative thinking about wicked problems) and twisted it to our purposes.

  • We end the HMW sentence with our problems (e.g., HMW cut costs by getting more customers to use self-service tools?).
  • We use it to brainstorm solutions to things that aren’t even problems (e.g., HMW eliminate all customer service options that aren’t self-serve?)
  • We mentally replace “might” with “will” so we can emerge from brainstorming sessions with a tactical implementation plan.

How Might Can YOU Fix HMW?

If you’re not getting creative, radical, or unexpected ideas from your brainstorming sessions, you have an HMW problem.< As a result, continuing to use HMW as a tool to prompt creative, radical, or unexpected ideas is the definition of insanity. And you are not insane. Instead, mix it up. Use different words to articulate the original intent of HMW.

How would we solve this problem if the answer to every request is YES?

Innovation thrives within constraints. Brainstorming doesn’t.

Even when you tell people not to constrain themselves, even implore them to value “quantity over quality,” you still get more “safe” ideas rather than more “crazy” ideas.

Do more than tell. Make a world without constraints real. Explicitly remove all the constraints people throw at ideas by creating a world of infinite money, people, capabilities, willingness, appetite for risk, and executive support. Doing this removes the dreaded “but” because there is no “but we don’t have the money/people/capabilities” or “but management will never go for it” and creates space for “and.”

What would we ask for if we were guaranteed a YES to only ONE request?

This question is often asked at the end of a brainstorm to prioritize ideas. But it’s equally helpful to ask it at the beginning.

This question shifts our mindset from “the bosses will never say yes, so I won’t even mention it” to “the bosses will say yes to only one thing, so it better be great!”  It pulls people off the sidelines and reveals what people believe to be the most critical element of a solution.   It drives passionate engagement amongst the whole team and acts as a springboard to the next brainstorm – How Might We use (what they said yes to) to solve (customers’ Jobs to be Done/problem)?

How would we solve the problem if the answer to every request is NO?

This one is a bit risky.

Some people will throw their hands in the air, declare the exercise a waste of time and effort, and collapse into a demotivated blob of resignation.

Some people will feel free. As Seth Godin wrote about a journal that promises to reject every single person who submits an article, “The absurdity of it is the point. Submitting to them feels effortless and without a lot of drama, because you know you’re going to get rejected. So instead of becoming attached to the outcome, you can simply focus on the work.”

For others, this will summon their inner rebel, the part of themselves that wants to stick it to the man, prove the doubters wrong, and unleash a great “I told you so” upon the world. To them, “No” is the start of the conversation, not the end. It fires them up to do their best work.

Don’t invite the first group of people to the brainstorm.

Definitely invite the other two groups.

How Might Will/Do YOU Fix HMW?

If you want something different, you need to do something different.

Start your next brainstorm with a new variation on the old HMW prompt.

How do people react? Does it lead to more creative or more “safe” ideas?

How might we adjust to do even better next time?

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.