“Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently.”– Henry Ford
The Insight: Viewing failure not as a setback but as a vital part of the learning process is a transformative approach for any leader. This mindset shift from fearing failure to embracing it as an opportunity can significantly enhance a team’s creativity, adaptability, and resilience.
The Research: While I can’t cite specific new studies, foundational research in organizational behavior underscores the value of embracing failure. For instance, Amy C. Edmondson’s concept of psychological safety, detailed in her work, highlights how creating an environment where team members feel safe to take risks and learn from failures leads to higher levels of innovation and performance.
Similarly, the principles of resilience, as discussed by Martin E.P. Seligman, suggest that learning from setbacks is crucial for developing a more agile and robust team. These theories support the idea that a culture tolerant of failure fosters an atmosphere where creativity and growth are not just encouraged but flourished.
Implement & Grow: To nurture a culture that embraces failure, start by openly discussing both successes and setbacks. Highlight the lessons learned from each failure and how these can drive future successes. Encourage your team to experiment and take calculated risks, reassuring them that failure is a step toward innovation, not a reason for punishment. Remember that the key about failure is learning.
This practice not only promotes a growth mindset but also strengthens the team’s cohesion and drive for continuous improvement.
Thus, by redefining failure as a cornerstone of learning and innovation, leaders can unlock their team’s potential and pave the way for groundbreaking achievements.
This is another post in my series on Strategies for Team Dynamics + Leadership Growth. Stay tuned for more!
Image Credit: Pixabay, Stefan Lindegaard
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.
At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?
But enough delay, here are March’s ten most popular innovation posts:
If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!
Have something to contribute?
Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.
P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last four years:
In the previous article on agile innovation we covered the main concepts around agile, business agility and its role as a driver for innovation. Now, let’s see how to actually leverage agility to innovate and how other companies have succeeded in this area.
Agility is an enabler for innovation. The pace of innovation, while not easy to achieve, has become the ultimate competitive advantage as we all need to adapt quickly to evolving environments, the digital age and increasing pressing needs.
The reality is that agile thinking is changing the world whether we decide to adopt it or not.
Those who succeed at this are ahead of the game. McKinsey research suggests that agility is a critical factor for organizational success.
The Organizational Health Index (OHI) assesses various aspects of organizational health, including agility, and examines how these factors correlate with business success. An increased organizational health is linked with more resilient, adaptive, and high-performing organizations that can better navigate complexity, drive innovation, and achieve strategic goals.
What’s more, agile organizations are best at balancing both speed and stability, and these are also the companies that rank highest in the organizational health index.
Source: McKinsey&Company
The research goes even deeper and identifies a series of management practices that differentiate the most from the least agile companies.
As you can see, there’s more to business agility than meets the eye and a few sprints just won’t cut it.
However, if we look at the agile principles, there are several ways in which they can enable innovation:
They bring an empirical process control approach, which emphasizes transparency, evaluation, and adaptation.
They enable experimentation and learning as teams are encouraged to test hypotheses, validate assumptions, and learn from both successes and failures. This experimental mindset is essential for innovation.
They are about adaptive planning processes that allow teams to adjust their priorities, strategies, and product roadmaps based on emerging opportunities and threats.
They emphasize customer-centricity. By focusing on delivering value to customers through continuous delivery and customer feedback loops, you make sure your innovations meet real market demands and solve genuine problems.
Theyencourage cross-functional collaboration and self-organizing teams, bringing together diverse perspectives and expertise.
To get a better idea of how this looks in practice, we’ll take the example of ING Bank.
ING Bank
ING is a global financial institution originally from the Netherlands and a good example to illustrate how agile can be introduced organization-wide, the right way.
ING wanted to become agile for the right reasons. The shift to agility wasn’t about working faster or growing more—it was about being flexible and adaptable. Even though things were going well financially in 2015, ING noticed that customer behavior was changing due to trends in other industries, not just in banking. So, they knew they had to change too.
ING Bank embraced several key principles of agility, drawing inspiration from the practices of tech companies to align with their objectives and operations:
Cross-Functional Teams: ING structured its IT and commercial departments into agile squads, mirroring the approach seen at Tesla. This integration fosters cross-functionality and collaboration, with teams physically situated together within the same premises.
source: McKinsey & Company
Rapid Decision-Making and Experimentation: Without bottlenecks created by middle management, ING facilitates swift decision-making and continuous experimentation. This agile approach enables the organization to constantly refine and test customer offerings without bureaucratic delays.
Enhanced Collaboration and Transparency: Recognizing the importance of collaboration, ING implemented structural changes to break down silos. Clear delineation of roles, responsibilities, and governance structures fosters improved cooperation across teams and departments.
Accelerated Delivery: Instead of their usual annual product launches, ING adopted a more agile release cycle, rolling out software updates every two weeks. This agile delivery model allows the organization to respond promptly to market demands and customer feedback, ensuring rapid innovation and adaptation.
The first step in achieving this agile transformation was to develop a clear strategy and vision. They started small and rolled out the new structures and way of working across the entire headquarters in eight to nine months.
Last, but not least, they invested significant energy and leadership time in fostering a culture of ownership, empowerment, and customer-centricity, which are foundational elements of an agile culture.
As Bart Schlatmann from ING points out, agility is a means to an end, not the end goal itself; it is the pathway to achieving innovation.
Drawing from these examples and research from other organizations, we can summarize the five tenets of agile organizations:
Purpose-Driven Mindset: Shift from a focus on capturing value to co-creating value with stakeholders, embodying a shared vision across the organization.
Empowered Network of Teams: Transition from top-down direction to self-organizing teams with clear responsibility and authority, fostering engagement, innovative thinking, and collaboration.
Rapid Learning Cycles: Embrace uncertainty and continuous improvement through iterative decision-making and experimentation, prioritizing quick adaptation over rigid planning.
Innovation Culture: Cultivate ownership, empowerment, and customer-centricity, enabling employees to drive organizational success.
Integrated Technology Enablement: View technology as integral to unlocking value and enabling responsiveness to business and stakeholder needs, leveraging advanced tools for seamless integration and rapid innovation.
Actionable Steps to Drive Innovation through Business Agility
We can’t wrap things up without going through some of the key steps that should not be missed in an agile transformation journey.
Constancy of purpose
You might have heard of Edwards Deming and even used his PDCA cycle in your continuous improvement work. He is well known for his legacy in the field of quality management, particularly for his contributions to the improvement of production processes in Japan after World War II. To some degree, his work is also seen as one of the main inspirations for the agile movement.
Among his work, we can also find the “14 Points for Management,” where Deming outlines how essential it is to have a clear and unwavering commitment to a long-term vision or mission.
He called it constancy of purpose. You can also call it your North Star. Regardless of the words you choose, it’s important to set your goals and align all activities, processes, and resources towards achieving them. How to do this?
Communicate the Purpose: Regularly communicate the organization’s purpose, mission and goals as well as how agility contributes to achieving them.
Define Goals: Clearly define objectives and goals that align with the organization’s purpose. These goals should support the overall mission and vision.
Empower Teams: Trust by default and enable teams to make decisions, take ownership of their ideas and work. Provide them with the autonomy and resources they need to innovate and deliver value.
Measure Progress: Measure progress towards your goals, but also establish metrics that can measure your ability to be responsive. Regularly review and assess how agile practices are contributing to the overall mission.
Adapt and Iterate: Embrace continuous improvement processes that align with your internal structures and needs. Encourage teams to experiment, learn, and iterate on their approaches.
Agile leadership
Adopt the ABC of leadership which drives innovation and makes the shift from “vertical ideology of control” to “horizontal ideology of enablement”.
Linda Hill, renowned professor at Harvard Business School, specializing in leadership and innovation makes a great point about the roles a leader should take if they want to drive innovation and agility.
Over time leadership evolved from a purely strategic role, to providing a vision that guides people in the same direction. More recently, research showed that a visionary leader is not enough. You need leaders that can also shape the culture and capabilities needed for people to co-create the future. This requires a different approach to leadership.
Research has identified that in order to lead an organization that innovates at scale with speed, you need leaders that fill in three different functions:
the Architect – to build the culture and capabilities necessary to collaborate, experiment and work.
the Bridger – to create the bridge between the outside and the inside of the organization by bringing together skills and tools to innovate at speed.
the Catalyst – to accelerate co-creation through the entire ecosystem.
Here is Hill’s short summary on the ABC of leadership:
Another top voice is Steve Denning who has been an advocate of agile and agile management for years. He makes some great points about the agile mindset which requires a new way of running organizations.
For an organization to be truly agile, the so called industrial-era management needs to be replaced with digital-age management which is strongly driven by an agile mindset.
The traditional management style makes it hard for agile to work because the old command-and-control approach goes against the agile principles. The top-down approach is riddled with bureaucracy which obstructs visibility to the customer and the realities at the lower levels of the organization.
Some of the most successful and innovative organizations, like Apple, Google, and Microsoft understood this early on and shifted their focus to delivering customer value first, one of the agile principles. This required a change in mindset but also in the corporate culture, which is no easy undertaking.
To make this transition, Denning talks about five major shifts that companies need to make:
From profit-focused to customer-focused goals.
From direct reporting to self-organizing teams where management’s role is not to check on employees, but to enable them to do their work by removing obstacles.
From bureaucracy, rules, and reports to work coordinated by Agile methods and customer feedback.
Prioritize transparency and continuous improvement over predictability.
Encourage horizontal communication rather than top-down directives.
While they are straightforward and make sense for most of us, these changes are maybe the hardest to make, especially for established organizations that are not used to challenging the status quo.
These big undertakings are what make agile possible at scale. But even if you’re not there yet, you can still apply the agile principles at a smaller scale to enable innovation.
Minimize complexity
Complexity is the enemy of agility. People in companies both large and small try to come up with the perfect solution, that often doesn’t exist in the first place, and only end up having solved the wrong problem.
On the other hand, if you were to simply move ahead quickly with something that creates real value and solves at least some of the problems, you’ll see which of your assumptions and concerns are real, and which aren’t. You’ll also see which problems you can work around, and which ones you simply must address directly.
This obviously eliminates a lot of uncertainty and reduces the complexity associated with solving the problem, which again helps you focus your innovation efforts on what matters – creating real value.
The bigger and more complex the problem, the more important it is to take an agile and modular approach.
Thus, the bigger and more complex the problem, the more important it is to take this agile and modular approach that focuses on the speed of making tangible progress.
Conclusion
As we explained in our complete guide to innovation management, there is no single perfect way of managing innovation. Different companies have different approaches for innovation management.
However, the common thread of successful organizations are structures and processes that mitigate the somehow chaotic nature of innovation management.
In these two articles we explored agile as a method to enable innovation and improve its management for sustained success. We don’t believe in quick fixes or miracle solutions. That’s why we made the case of agile as a mindset that should permeate every aspect of the organization.
Article originally published in full format on viima.com/blog
Image credit: Unsplash, McKinsey
Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.
For the past 50 years, innovation has largely been driven by our ability to cram more transistors onto a silicon wafer. That’s what’s allowed us to double the power of our technology every two years or so and led to the continuous flow of new products and services streaming out of innovative organizations.
Perhaps not surprisingly, over the past few decades agility has become a defining competitive attribute. Because the fundamentals of digital technology have been so well understood, much of the value has shifted to applications and things like design and user experience. Yet that will change in the years ahead.
Over the next few decades we will struggle to adapt to a post-digital age and we will need to rethink old notions about agility. To win in this new era of innovation we will have to do far more than just move fast and break things. Rather, we will have to manage four profound shifts in the basis of competition that will challenge some of our most deeply held notions.
Shift 1: From Transistor-Based Computers to New Computing Architectures
In 1965, Intel’s Gordon Moore published a paper that established predicted Moore’s Law, the continuous doubling of transistors that can fit on an integrated circuit. With a constant stream of chips that were not only more powerful, but cheaper, successful firms would rapidly prototype and iterate to speed new applications to market.
Yet now Moore’s Law is ending. Despite the amazing ingenuity of engineers, the simple reality is that every technology eventually hits theoretical limits. The undeniable fact is that atoms are only so small and the speed of light is only so fast and that limits what we can do with transistors. To advance further, we will simply have to find a different way to compute things.
The two most promising candidates are quantum computing and neuromorphic chips, both of which are vastly different from digital computing, utilizing different logic and require different computer languages and algorithmic approaches than classical computers. The transition to these architectures won’t be seamless.
We will also use these architectures in much different ways. Quantum computers will be able to handle almost incomprehensible complexity, generating computing spaces larger than the number of atoms in the known universe. Neuromorphic chips are potentially millions of times more efficient than conventional chips and are much more effective with continuous streams of data, so may be well suited for edge computing and tasks like machine vision.
Shift 2: From Bits to Atoms
The 20th century saw two major waves of innovation. The first, dominated by electricity and internal combustion, revolutionized how we could manipulate the physical world. The second, driven by quantum physics, microbial science and computing, transformed how we could work with the microscopic and the virtual.
The past few decades have been dominated by the digital revolution and it seems like things have been moving very fast, but looks can be deceiving. If you walked into an average 1950s era household, you would see much that you would recognize, including home appliances, a TV and an automobile. On the other hand, if you had to live in a 1900’s era home, with no running water or electricity, you would struggle to survive.
The next era will combine aspects of both waves, essentially using bits to drive atoms. We’re building vast databases of genes and materials, cataloging highly specific aspects of the physical world. We are also using powerful machine learning algorithms to analyze these vast droves of data and derive insights. The revolution underway is so profound that it’s reshaping the scientific method.
In the years to come, new computing architectures are likely to accelerate this process. Simulating chemistry is one of the first applications being explored for quantum computers, which will help us build larger and more detailed databases. Neuromorphic technology will allow us to shift from the cloud to the edge, enabling factories to get much smarter.
The way we interface with the physical world is changing as well. New techniques such as CRISPR helps us edit genes at will. There is also an emerging revolution in materials science that will transform areas like energy and manufacturing. These trends are still somewhat nascent, but have truly transformative potential.
Shift 3: From Rapid Iteration to Exploration
Over the past 30 years, we’ve had the luxury of working with technologies we understand extremely well. Every generation of microchips opened vast new possibilities, but worked exactly the same way as the last generation, creating minimal switching costs. The main challenge was to design applications.
So it shouldn’t be surprising that rapid iteration emerged as a key strategy. When you understand the fundamental technology that underlies a product or service, you can move quickly, trying out nearly endless permutations until you arrive at an optimized solution. That’s often far more effective than a planned, deliberate approach.
Over the next decade or two, however, the challenge will be to advance technology that we don’t understand well at all. As noted above, quantum and neuromorphic computing are still in their nascent stages. Improvements in genomics and materials science are redefining the boundaries of those fields. There are also ethical issues involved with artificial intelligence and genomics that will require us to tread carefully.
So in the future, we will need to put greater emphasis on exploration to understand these new technologies and how they relate to our businesses. Instead of looking to disrupt markets, we will need to pursue grand challenges to solve fundamental problems. Most of all, it’s imperative to start early. By the time many of these technologies hit their stride, it will be too late to catch up.
Shift 4. From Hyper Competition to Mass Collaboration
The competitive environment we’ve become used to has been relatively simple. For each particular industry, there have been distinct ecosystems based on established fields of expertise. Competing firms raced to transform fairly undifferentiated inputs into highly differentiated products and services. You needed to move fast to get an edge.
This new era, on the other hand, will be one of mass collaboration in which government partners with academia and industry to explore new technologies in the pre competitive phase. For example, the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research combines the work of five national labs, a dozen or so academic institutions and hundreds of companies to develop advance batteries. Covid has redefined how scientists collaborate across institutional barriers.
Or consider the Manufacturing Institutes set up under the Obama administration. Focusing on everything from advanced fabrics to biopharmaceuticals, these allow companies to collaborate with government labs and top academics to develop the next generation of technologies. They also operate dozens of testing facilities to help bring new products to market faster.
I’ve visited some of these facilities and have had the opportunity to talk with executives from participating companies. What struck me was how palpable the excitement about the possibilities of this new era was. Agility for them didn’t mean learning to run faster down a chosen course, but to widen and deepen connections throughout a technological ecosystem.
Over the past few decades, we have largely been moving faster and faster down a predetermined path. Over the next few decades, however, we’ll increasingly need to explore multiple domains at once and combine them into something that produces value. We’ll need to learn how to go slower to deliver much larger impacts.
You may know that I’m hunting for a Transformation Algorithm
Its goal is to help us move beyond the >70% failure rate of corporate transformations and create transformative experiences for employees, customers and society. Ambitious? Moi?
To get there, I’m walking around the problem.
Looking at it from all perspectives (Japan style). So without claiming expertise in any domain, I’m blending systems thinking with neuroscience, behavioral psychology, philosophy and my background in experience design. There’s even a little math (I couldn’t resist .
It’s a work in progress, but I’m getting there.
Meanwhile, here are some more thoughts as I put together the puzzle. The article starts a bit gloomy, but it ends more upbeat… I promise.
It’s all work in progress in which I’m still improving both language and content.
So don’t hold back on comments, compliments or corrections.
These days, every company wants to see a ‘mindset change’.
People need to be customer-centric. Digital. Agile. Sustainable. Innovative. More in love with the color blue. After all, the consultants, executive trainers and software vendors say this is the future. Not to mention Mark’s metaverse:
To make this happen, organizations unleash a barrage of initiatives
They do enthusiastic presentations. Introduce new KPIs and dashboards. Launch internal communication programs and training academies. Create new journey maps. Introduce AI. Get some fancy software.
Some even call me (obviously the smartest ones ).
At first, the signs are good.
After all, with enough pressure, you can get water to go uphill. Also, any decent third-party consultant or vendor will make sure that employees leave those workshops with a smile and some quick wins. Especially those that show progress in pretty graphs and numbers.
But then – one by one – the ‘old ways’ assert themselves
They raise dozens of practical, budgetary, emotional and IT concerns which are all valid and require the change program to be calibrated. After all, leaders need to be pragmatic. These thousand slight cuts erode the big transformative vision and expectations get lowered. Things might even become as they were.
#endofmindsetchange?
What if we were aiming at the wrong target?
If you look up mindset in a dictionary, you find it is a mental attitude or inclination. The combined set of assumptions, methods and notions with which each of us approaches problems and the world at large (our perspective). Something rooted in the way we view the world and our perception of reality (our paradigm).
This means that every mindset change is in fact a change in perspective or paradigm.
Let me illustrate with a consumer electronics company that wanted to go from product- to customer-centric value propositions. Digging deep, we found that from the engineer’s perspective, the requested mindset change meant letting go of their long held belief that as the world’s best technical experts they knew how to make the best products on the planet (and had the awards and accolades to prove it).
Instead, they had to embrace that the customer knew better what great looked like and their opinion didn’t matter as much as they thought.
If you’ve worked all your life to become that smart and esteemed technical expert, this is an existential pill to swallow. Especially if the only rationale from the top is that “our Net Promoter Score should improve”.
These shifts in perspective lurk in any transformation
Being agile means seeing that we live in a chaotic world where we can never really be sure of our best next step. True sustainability means accepting that there are limits to growth, also ours. Going digital means letting go of activities we have long considered to be uniquely human (ours?). Innovation requires unlearning the orthodoxies and beliefs we may have held since childhood. And so on.
For some people, these steps may be easy. But for most, they can challenge the core of who they are (even if they may not admit this to themselves).
Ignoring this deeper reality can doom your transformation from the start.
If the new KPIs, processes, systems and incentives you introduce do not match the worldview of the people you target, they will reject them. Sometimes they rebel. Sometimes they stand in the way without realizing it themselves. Either way, your culture will eat your strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
So what to do instead?
If you want mindset change, focus on the paradigm shift first.
Before you expect people to approach problems differently (mindset), work on the way they perceive these problems and their context. Clearly describe the required paradigm shift in a FROM… TO… statement and make it as compelling as possible. All while acknowledging the uncomfortable bits head on.
Then, give people opportunities to embrace this new narrative through experiential programs (remember: the old brain doesn’t do PowerPoint).
Once they see the world with fresh eyes, the mindset and changes will follow.
Or as my ultimate change guru Antoine de Saint-Exupéry used to say: “if you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.”
But always remember that your perception as a leader is flawed too.
When you say: ‘I want a mindset change’, you are actually saying: ‘I want you to see the world as I do’.
This is often a big ask, as chances are you live in a world that is more affluent, more educated and more informed (I won’t mention diversity … oops, I did). You probably have a different education, live in a different social media bubble and even shop in different stores. You may even have the freedom to make your own decisions.
Seeing life your way, may not be as easy for someone who has grown up, works and lives in a different context (no value judgment here, just observation).
Inversely, unless you’ve done their jobs and lived their lives, you will have difficulties to imagine the world through the eyes of your people. No matter how you try.
So before you talk about mindset change.
Understand and start from your people’s perspective and then expand it in the direction you propose. And if the gap between the two is too big, consider adapting your strategy.
Perhaps your world view and sense of possibility need an update too.
Image Credits: Pixabay
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.
The principles of agile development have revolutionized how teams work together, prioritize tasks, and deliver value to their stakeholders. Embedded within agile methodologies is the concept of continuous improvement, serving as a fundamental pillar to drive adaptability, efficiency, and growth. In this article, I will explore the crucial role of continuous improvement in agile, supported by two insightful case studies that highlight its transformative power.
The Essence of Continuous Improvement in Agile
Continuous improvement, embedded deeply in agile methodologies, ensures that teams constantly evaluate their processes, learn from their experiences, and iteratively enhance their workflows. This principle is particularly manifest in the ‘inspect and adapt’ process, which is central to Scrum’s sprints. Agile’s emphasis on regular reflection and incremental advancements enables teams to address inefficiencies and innovate without burnout.
Key Benefits of Continuous Improvement
Increased Efficiency: By continually reviewing processes, teams can streamline workflows, eliminate waste, and focus on high-value tasks.
Enhanced Quality: Iterative review periods allow teams to identify and fix issues quickly, improving the quality of deliverables.
Adaptability: Teams can swiftly adapt to changes, ensuring that they remain aligned with market demands and organizational goals.
Case Study 1: TechnoSolution Inc.
TechnoSolution Inc., a mid-size software development firm, embraced agile methodologies but initially struggled with rigid structures that stifled innovation. By implementing continuous improvement through retrospectives at the end of each sprint, the company saw substantial gains.
Teams began to utilize root cause analysis to understand deployment delays. Through strategic adjustments, they effectively reduced lead times by 30% and enhanced customer satisfaction. Continuous improvement fostered an environment where employees felt empowered to voice concerns, leading to increased morale and innovation.
Case Study 2: CreativeDesign Studios
CreativeDesign Studios, a leader in UX/UI design, recognized the importance of agility in staying ahead of design trends. However, the fast pace of agile sprints initially overwhelmed their creative process. By embedding continuous improvement methodologies, they transformed challenges into opportunities.
Through bi-weekly retrospectives, team members shared insights on design bottlenecks, resulting in a new collaborative workflow. With this approach, each sprint began to incorporate new tools and techniques based on previous learnings. Over six months, project delivery times were halved, and client feedback scores surged by 40%. Continuous improvement invigorated their agile framework and fueled creative excellence.
Conclusion
Continuous improvement is the heartbeat of agility, enabling teams to grow, adapt, and excel. It demands a culture of openness, reflection, and relentless pursuit of excellence. As demonstrated by TechnoSolution Inc. and CreativeDesign Studios, embedding continuous improvement within agile processes not only enhances performance but also fosters an innovative and dynamic work environment. Organizations that embrace continuous improvement within the agile ecosystem position themselves for long-term success and resilience.
By leveraging the power of constant refinement, teams are empowered to break down barriers, drive innovation, and deliver value in a rapidly changing world. Continuous improvement isn’t just a practice; it’s the pathway to enduring success.
Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.
Image credit: misterinnovation.com
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.
In today’s rapidly evolving business environment, agility is not just an option; it is a necessity. Embracing agile methodologies allows organizations to respond quickly to market changes, deliver customer value continuously, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Herein, I present two compelling agile success stories that highlight how businesses have effectively applied agile principles to drive innovation and achieve remarkable results.
Case Study 1: Financial Services Firm Revolutionizes Customer Experience
The first case study focuses on a large financial services firm that faced challenges with customer engagement and service delivery in an increasingly digital market. By deploying agile methodologies across their development teams, the firm successfully transformed its customer experience.
Implementing Agile
The firm restructured its teams to be cross-functional, promoting collaboration between IT, marketing, and customer service. With agile coaches leading the transformation, the organization adopted Scrum as its primary framework. The focus was on sprints aimed at delivering incremental improvements to their digital channels.
Outcome
Within a year, the firm reported a 30% increase in customer satisfaction scores. New features and improvements were delivered bi-weekly, significantly outpacing their previous quarterly release cycle. The agile transformation not only enhanced customer interactions but also improved employee job satisfaction by empowering teams to own projects end-to-end.
Key Points:
Cross-functional teams led to better collaboration and innovation.
Customer-centricity drove measurable improvements in satisfaction.
Case Study 2: Global Retailer Streamlines Supply Chain Operations
In our second example, a global retailer sought to optimize its supply chain operations to reduce costs and improve efficiency. By leveraging agile principles, the company transformed its logistics and operations to better align with market demands.
Agile Transformation
The retailer invested in agile training for supply chain managers and introduced Kanban boards to visualize workflows and identify bottlenecks. Teams were empowered to experiment with innovative solutions, with a focus on reducing waste and improving productivity.
Impact
Within six months, the retailer reduced inventory holding costs by 20% and improved order fulfillment rates by 15%. The advanced visibility into operations allowed for better forecasting and demand planning, directly impacting the bottom line.
Key Points:
Agile practices provided transparency and improved communication across the supply chain.
Focus on lean principles helped in reducing waste, cutting costs, and improving efficiency.
Enhanced decision-making capabilities led to improved customer service levels.
Conclusion
Both of these success stories underscore the power of agile methodologies in driving organizational transformation. By prioritizing collaboration, flexibility, and customer value, organizations not only navigate change more effectively but also pave the way for sustained innovation and success. Whether it’s enhancing customer interaction or optimizing back-end processes, agility holds the key to thriving in today’s dynamic business landscape.
SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.
Image credit: Pexels
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.
In an era where the technology landscape is constantly shifting, large organizations find themselves in a dilemma. How do they remain nimble and innovative while managing complex structures and processes? The answer for many is Agile—a methodology once the preserve of small teams, now being scaled to fit the groundwork of multi-layered businesses. But scaling Agile in large organizations isn’t just about implementing new processes and tools; it’s about fostering a culture shift that emphasizes collaboration, efficiency, and customer-centricity.
The Need for Scaling Agile
Large organizations traditionally operate in silos, with distinct departments managing their own priorities. This often leads to misalignment and inefficiency. Agile methodology helps break down these silos, promoting cross-functional collaboration and aligning teams with the organization’s overall goals. The key to scaling Agile successfully is not merely in extending Agile practices organization-wide, but in tailoring them to fit unique organizational contexts while maintaining the core Agile principles.
Case Study 1: Implementing Agile at Scaled Levels – The Spotify Model
Spotify’s scaling of Agile is widely regarded as a benchmark for large organizations. Recognizing the limitations of traditional hierarchies, Spotify created a new organizational framework that supports agile at scale. They introduced ‘Squads’, which are akin to Scrum teams, emphasizing autonomy and accountability. These Squads are powered by ‘Tribes’ to maintain coherence, and ‘Chapters’ and ‘Guilds’ to foster skill development and knowledge sharing.
By focusing on cultural values and providing a structure that emphasizes trust, transparency, and strong team identity, Spotify was able to enhance its ability to innovate while scaling its business. The success of this model lies in its flexibility, allowing other organizations to adapt it to their own needs and challenges.
Case Study 2: Scaling Agile at Microsoft – The Journey to Business Agility
Microsoft’s transition to Agile was driven by the need to better respond to customer needs in a rapidly evolving market. By adopting agile practices across various product teams, Microsoft sought to improve its development processes and enhance product quality. The journey was not without challenges; initial resistance was expected and encountered.
Microsoft tackled these by investing in comprehensive Agile training programs and fostering a culture of continuous feedback and improvement. They broke down traditional silos and championed cross-functional teamwork, resulting in quicker release cycles and increased innovation.
The transformation at Microsoft underscores the importance of persistence, leadership commitment, and a well-articulated vision in scaling Agile across a large organization.
Conclusion
Scaling Agile in large organizations is more about mindset shifts than merely adopting a set of practices. It requires embracing transparency, collaboration, and a focus on delivering value to customers. The experiences of Spotify and Microsoft highlight the adaptability and benefits of Agile methods but also illustrate the necessity of context-specific strategies and strong leadership.
For large organizations looking to scale Agile, it’s crucial to drive cultural change, empower teams, and remain adaptable to continually refine the approach as new challenges and opportunities arise.
I hope you have enjoyed my attempt to provide a structured and informative perspective on how large organizations can scale Agile methodologies effectively, illustrated with case studies of Spotify and Microsoft.
SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.
Image credit: Pixabay
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.
Agile is not just a methodology, but a holistic approach to project management and software development. It emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and rapid iteration. The core of Agile lies in its set of principles and practices designed to advance productivity and responsiveness to changing customer needs.
The Core Principles of Agile
Customer Satisfaction through Early and Continuous Delivery: Deliver valuable software frequently, with a preference for shorter timescales.
Welcome Changing Requirements: Even late in the development process, Agile processes harness change for the customer’s competitive advantage.
Deliver Working Software Frequently: Prefer shorter timescales from a couple of weeks to a couple of months.
Collaborate Daily with Business People and Developers: Ensure a close, daily cooperation between business stakeholders and developers.
Build Projects around Motivated Individuals: Provide support and trust to the team, allowing them to get the job done.
Face-to-Face Conversation: The most efficient method of conveying information to and within a development team is direct communication.
Working Software is the Primary Measure of Progress: Focus on functional software to gauge how well the project is advancing.
Maintain a Sustainable Pace: Agile processes promote sustainable development — the team should maintain a constant pace indefinitely.
Continuous Attention to Technical Excellence: Enhances agility by focusing on good design and technical details.
Simplicity is Essential: Maximize the amount of work not done, which is important.
Self-Organizing Teams: The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams.
Regular Reflection and Adjustment: Periodically, the team reflects on how to become more effective and adjusts their behavior accordingly.
Case Study 1: Pixar’s Agile Film Making
Many might be familiar with Agile in software development, but Pixar, a leading animation studio, has effectively applied Agile principles in film making. Pixar’s process is not linear. Instead, they iterate on pieces of the film, from storyboarding to final animation, with constant feedback loops.
One key Agile principle Pixar uses is “early and continuous delivery of valuable increments.” This is evident where they focus on delivering short, rough sequences of the film for team and stakeholder review. These rough animations, or ‘reels,’ are iterated upon until the final movie emerges. Pixar also promotes a culture where it’s safe to fail early, as their focus is on rapid prototyping and feedback cycles.
Case Study 2: Spotify and Agile Scaling
Spotify, the global music streaming service, provides a stunning showcase of scaling Agile. Instead of traditional teams, Spotify uses “squads” — small, cross-functional, and self-organizing teams. Each squad operates much like a mini-startup, with accountability for a particular aspect of the service.
Spotify has scaled Agile by structuring squads into Tribes, which work on related areas of the service, allowing for collaboration and alignment. Governance is decentralized, and autonomy is high, which aligns with the Agile principle of self-organizing teams. Another critical aspect is Spotify’s use of “guilds” — groups of individuals with shared interests spanning across different squads, facilitating knowledge sharing and continuous improvement across the organization.
Agile Practices to Implement
Below are several Agile practices to consider implementing in your organization:
User Stories: Captures requirements from the perspective of the end-user.
Sprint Planning: Prioritize and plan work in time-boxed iterations.
Daily Stand-ups: Short, focused meetings to synchronize the team and address obstacles.
Sprint Reviews: Demonstrate and inspect the product after each iteration.
Retrospectives: Reflect on the process to identify improvements.
Kanban Boards: Visualize workflow and limit work in progress to optimize efficiency.
Conclusion
The adoption of Agile introduces a paradigm shift in how teams approach project management and execution. By embracing its principles and practices, organizations can enhance flexibility, foster innovation, and better respond to evolving customer needs. The case studies of Pixar and Spotify illustrate the versatile application of Agile across different domains, highlighting its potential to drive success whether in film making or global software services.
SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.
Image credit: Pixabay
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.
Strategies for Designing Agile and Resilient Organizations that can Effectively Navigate Industry Disruptions
GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
In today’s fast-paced and ever-evolving business landscape, organizations face continuous disruptions that challenge their ability to remain competitive and thrive. To navigate these disruptions successfully, organizations must prioritize resilience and agility. By designing resilient organizations that can adapt and respond effectively, leaders can better position their businesses to weather industry disruptions and emerge stronger. In this article, we will explore strategies that can help build agile and resilient organizations, showcasing two compelling case studies that demonstrate their practical application.
1. Embracing a Culture of Adaptability:
A resilient organization begins with a resilient culture. Companies that foster a mindset of adaptability and continuous learning are better equipped to navigate industry disruptions. Organizations must first assess their current culture and identify areas in need of improvement. By encouraging innovation, risk-taking, and employee empowerment, businesses can build an environment that promotes flexibility and agility.
Case Study 1: Netflix
Netflix, originally a DVD rental service, recognized the shift in consumer behavior towards streaming services. Instead of resisting the change, Netflix embraced the disruption by evolving into a leading provider of online content. By prioritizing adaptability and empowering employees to experiment and take risks, Netflix capitalized on the opportunity to transform its business model, ultimately becoming one of the most influential disruptors in the entertainment industry.
2. Developing Robust Strategic Planning:
Strategic planning is essential for building resilient organizations. Effective planning allows businesses to anticipate disruptions, make proactive decisions, and quickly adapt to market shifts. Organizations must be willing to challenge conventional thinking, explore alternative scenarios, and foster an environment that supports experimentation.
Case Study 2: Amazon
Amazon’s journey from an online bookstore to a global retail giant serves as a testament to the company’s strategic planning capabilities. Amazon consistently invests in innovation, technology, and supply chain optimization to maintain a competitive edge. By staying ahead of industry disruptions, Amazon successfully integrated new business models like marketplace platforms and cloud computing, ensuring long-term sustainability.
3. Building Collaborative Networks:
In an increasingly interconnected business world, organizations cannot thrive in isolation. Resilient organizations actively cultivate partnerships, collaborations, and networks that allow them to leverage shared knowledge, resources, and expertise. Building strong relationships with suppliers, customers, and industry players fosters resilience by enhancing access to valuable information and enabling collaboration during times of disruption.
Conclusion
Building resilient organizations is vital to navigating industry disruptions successfully. By embracing a culture of adaptability, establishing robust strategic planning processes, and cultivating collaborative networks, businesses can enhance their resilience and fortify their ability to thrive amid uncertainty. The case studies of Netflix and Amazon exemplify these strategies’ effectiveness, showcasing how organizations that prioritize agility and resilience can not only survive but also lead industry disruptions. By leveraging these approaches, organizations can position themselves as catalysts for positive change and build a future-ready business ecosystem.
SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.
Image credit: Pixabay
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.