How to Turn Fear into Fuel for Innovation

The Change Mindset

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The relentless pace of modern business ensures one constant: Change is mandatory. Yet, the average project failure rate stubbornly hovers around 70%. This failure isn’t technical; it’s human. It’s the result of change-makers ignoring the most fundamental driver of resistance: Fear.

Fear — of the unknown, of losing control, of being exposed as inadequate — is a natural, physiological response to disruption. In the workplace, this fear becomes a powerful, paralyzing force. Our primary goal as innovation and change leaders must therefore be to cultivate a widespread, innate Change Mindset — the ability to not just tolerate organizational anxiety, but to consciously process and convert it into the potent energy required for creative action. This is the bedrock of Braden Kelley’s Human-Centered Change methodology.

Recognizing Resistance as a Vital Signal

When resistance appears, our default managerial response is often to push harder, double-down on communication, or blame culture. This is a mistake. Resistance is not an adversary to be defeated; it is a vital signal — a rich source of insight. The human brain’s threat-detection center, the amygdala, doesn’t distinguish between a saber-toothed tiger and a new organizational chart. It simply signals danger, initiating a “fight or flight” response.

To unlock the Change Mindset, we must move beyond the Adoption Mindset — which focuses on forcing the “what” of the change—to an Engagement Mindset — which focuses on co-creating the “how” and “why.” The goal is to interrupt the fear-to-resistance loop by making the process itself safe.

Three Levers for Cultivating the Change Mindset

A resilient Change Mindset is built on systemic practices that address the three deep human needs for motivation: Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose (AMP).

De-Risk Failure and Celebrate Unlearning: The primary fear is often the consequence of failure (public critique, professional setback). Leaders must create a “Failure Budget” where lessons learned are not hidden, but treated as necessary R&D costs. More critically, we must celebrate unlearning — the difficult work of letting go of old, comfortable competencies. The mantra must shift from “Do this perfectly” to “Experiment, learn quickly, and share the failure data.”
Engage the Co-Creation Imperative: No one resists what they help create. The fastest path to mitigating the fear of losing control is to distribute control. Change should not be designed in an ivory tower and then ‘cascaded.’ Involve the end-users — those whose lives will be most impacted — in the design of the new process from the beginning. This shared ownership is the most powerful antidote to resistance.
Translate Fear into a Shared North Star: Fear is paralyzing when it’s personal. It becomes motivating when it’s acknowledged, externalized, and channeled toward a compelling, shared future. The leader’s job is to define the North Star — the purpose that clearly links the pain of change today to a truly meaningful, beneficial outcome tomorrow. This purpose is the sustainable fuel, far more potent than any mandate or bonus.

Case Study 1: The Global Financial Services Firm – Co-Designing Compliance

Challenge: Shifting to Agile in a Risk-Averse Environment

A major financial services firm had to adopt an iterative digital product model, but faced massive cultural resistance. The entrenched fear, particularly from Legal and Compliance teams, was that faster development would inevitably lead to regulatory breaches and career-ending risk.

Intervention:

The firm avoided a traditional mandate. Instead, they created cross-functional “Innovation Pods” that explicitly included key members from Legal and Compliance. Leaders openly validated the regulatory fears. They then empowered these Pods to co-design a new, accelerated compliance process that built real-time, automated regulatory checks directly into the development tools. The mindset shifted from “Compliance is an obstacle” to “Compliance is a co-creator of speed and safety.” By letting the most fearful groups design the control mechanisms, resistance evaporated, and product development speed increased by over 40%.

Case Study 2: The Healthcare Provider Network – Peer-Led Mastery

Challenge: EHR Integration and Physician Burnout

A large hospital network faced a change management catastrophe: merging three disparate Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. This change amplified existing physician burnout and deep-seated fears about workflow disruption and patient safety issues.

Intervention:

The project used a Human-Centered Change approach focused on peer-to-peer enablement. They identified respected Physician Change Champions who were trained in both the new system and Change Leadership principles. These champions led short, peer-focused “unlearning” sessions designed to remove the five most frustrating administrative steps from the old system first. The narrative was intentionally shifted from “We’re losing the old system” to “We are adopting better tools to reclaim time for patient care and achieve better outcomes.” This focus on shared purpose and empowering clinical autonomy resulted in a 95% adoption rate within the first quarter and a measurable reduction in administrative friction.

Conclusion: Change is a Human System

The Change Mindset is not about eliminating fear; it’s about acknowledging it and leveraging its energy. We must stop treating resistance as an adversary and start seeing it as the raw, powerful energy of human emotion that comes with any significant disruption. To lead change is to be the ultimate Human-Centered Designer. It means designing the environment and the process to make it psychologically safe for people to take the necessary risk of letting go of the past.

“The Change Mindset is the belief that the energy generated by fear, when properly acknowledged and channeled through co-creation, is the most sustainable and potent fuel available for continuous innovation. Embrace the human system.”

Your first step toward a Change Mindset is simple: Before launching your next initiative, pause and map the three greatest fears of your end-users. Then, invite them to design the solutions to those fears. The future belongs not to the fastest technology, but to the most adaptable human system.

For more detail on different elements of people’s change mindsets to harness going into any change or transformation initiative, I encourage you to check out Braden Kelley’s Eight Change Mindsets

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Top 10 Risks of Not Doing Annual Customer Experience Audits

Leave a reply

Top 10 Risks of Not Doing Annual Customer Experience Audits

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Organizations today are more focused than ever on delivering superior customer experiences. However, when businesses neglect to conduct annual Customer Experience (CX) audits, they expose themselves to numerous risks that can undermine their success. Identifying and addressing these risks is crucial to maintaining not just customer satisfaction, but also overall business health.

Risk 1: Ignoring Customer Needs

Failing to audit your customer experience annually can result in blind spots regarding what your customers truly need. Markets change, and so do customer expectations. If you do not periodically examine your customer interactions, you may overlook evolving preferences and miss opportunities for innovation.

Risk 2: Increased Customer Churn

Without reassessing your customer experience, it’s possible to miss signs of dissatisfaction that lead to customer churn. Regular CX audits help identify areas causing friction, allowing you to address them before it’s too late.

Risk 3: Damage to Brand Reputation

Negative customer experiences can quickly damage a brand’s reputation in the age of social media. An annual audit helps spot potential issues in customer touchpoints and interactions before they snowball into damaging reviews and negative word-of-mouth.

Risk 4: Competitive Disadvantage

Companies that ignore customer experience audits may find themselves losing ground to competitors who leverage these audits to innovate and improve their offerings. Staying competitive requires a proactive approach to understanding and enhancing the customer journey.

Case Study: Company X’s Wake-Up Call

Company X, a retail giant, believed that their customer satisfaction scores were sufficient proof of their customer experience success. They skipped CX audits for several years, only to discover widespread customer dissatisfaction that culminated in a measurable drop in sales. Once identified, issues such as outdated return policies and slow customer service were rapidly addressed, but the company had already suffered a substantial competitive setback.

Risk 5: Loss of Employee Engagement

An overlooked aspect of customer experience is its impact on employees. When organizations neglect regular audits, they may miss recognizing areas where employee-customer interactions could be improved, resulting in decreased employee engagement and morale.

Risk 6: Financial Consequences

Poor customer experiences can have direct financial repercussions. From loss of sales to increased marketing spend needed to win back lost customers, the absence of annual CX audits could hit the bottom line hard.

Risk 7: Inadequate Personalization

In today’s market, personalization is key. Without annual audits, organizations might fail to recognize the shift towards personalized customer experiences, falling behind competitors who adeptly grasp and apply this knowledge.

Risk 8: Inaccurate Market Positioning

Without annually measuring the customer experience, businesses may inadvertently misposition themselves over time relative to their market and customer expectations.

Case Study: Hotel Z’s Strategic Pivot

Hotel Z thought they understood their clientele, but declining bookings told a different story. After finally undertaking a comprehensive CX audit, they discovered shifting demographics amongst their guests towards younger tourists seeking tech-savvy environments. By pivoting their strategy to offer digital concierge services, they rejuvenated their business model and saw an upsurge in bookings.

Risk 9: Regulatory Non-Compliance

Often overlooked, regulatory compliance is an area that could be at risk without regular audits. Changes in laws and consumer protection guidelines need to be constantly monitored to ensure ongoing compliance.

Risk 10: Missed Innovation Opportunities

Customer feedback gleaned during an audit can serve as a catalyst for innovation. Companies that forgo these audits may miss critical insights into how they can enhance or transform their offerings.

Conclusion

In an era where customer expectations are rapidly evolving, not conducting regular Customer Experience audits can subject firms to significant risks. From eroding brand reputation to losing competitiveness, understanding these pitfalls highlights the necessity of integrating CX audits as a staple in any comprehensive business strategy. For more insights on enhancing your business strategies, consider visiting these articles on Innovative Ways to Gather Customer Feedback and Understanding Customer Needs and Expectations.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Forbidden Truth About Innovation

2 Replies

Forbidden Truth About Innovation

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

If you heard it once, you heard it a thousand times:

Big companies can’t innovate
We need to innovate before we get too big and slow
Startups are innovative. Big companies are dinosaurs. They can’t innovate.

And yet you persevere because you know the truth:

Big companies CAN innovate.

They CHOOSE not to.

Using Innovation to drive growth is a choice.

Just like choosing to grow through acquisition or expansion into new markets is a choice.

All those choices are complex, uncertain, and risky. In fact:

70 – 95% of innovations fail
70 – 90% of acquisitions fail
~80% of market entry efforts fail

Hold on. The odds of failure are the same!

All three growth drivers have similar failure rates, but no one says, “Big companies can’t acquire things” or “Big companies can’t expand into new markets.”

We expect big companies to engage in acquisitions and market expansion.

Failed acquisitions and market expansions prove us (or at least our expectations) wrong. Because we don’t like being wrong, we study our failures so that we can change, improve, and increase our odds of success next time.

We expect big companies to fail at innovation.

In this case, failure proves us right. We love being right, so we shrug and say, “Big companies can’t innovate.”

We let big companies off the hook.

Why are our expectations so different?

Since the dawn of commerce, businesses engaged in innovation, acquisitions, and market expansion. But innovation is different from M&A and market expansion in three fundamental ways:

Innovation is “new” – Even though businesses have engaged in innovation, acquisitions, and market expansion since the very earliest days of commerce, innovation only recently became a topic worthy of discussion, study, and investment. In fact, it wasn’t until the 1960s that Innovation was recognized as worthy of research and deliberate investment.

Innovation starts small – Unlike acquisitions and new markets that can be easily sized and forecasted, in the early days of an innovation, it’s hard to know how big it could be.

Innovation takes time – Innovation doesn’t come with a predictable launch date. Even its possible launch date is usually 3 to 5 years away, unlike acquisition closing dates that are often within a year.

What can we do about this?

We can’t change what innovation is (new, small, and slow at the start), but we can change our expectations.

Finish the sentence – “Big companies can’t innovate” absolves companies of the responsibility to make a good-faith effort to try to innovate by making their struggles an unavoidable consequence of their size. But it’s not inevitable, and continuing the sentence proves it. Saying “Big companies can’t innovate because…” forces people to acknowledge the root causes of companies’ innovation struggles. In many ways, this was the great A-HA! of The Innovator’s Dilemma: Big companies can’t innovate because their focus on providing better (and more expensive) solutions to their best customers results in them ceding the low-end of the market and non-consumers to other companies.

Be honest – Once you’ve identified the root cause, you can choose to do something different (and get different results) or do everything the same (and get the same results). If you choose to keep doing the same things in the same ways, that’s fine. Own the decision.

Change your choice. Change your expectations – If you do choose to do things differently, address the root causes, and resolve the barriers, then walk the talk. Stop expecting innovation to fail and start expecting it to be as successful as your acquisition and market expansion efforts. Stop investing two people and $10 in innovation and start investing the same quantity and quality of resources as you invest and other growth efforts.

The first step in change is admitting that change is needed. When we accept that “big companies can’t innovate” simply because they’re big, we absolve them of their responsibility to follow through on proclamations and strategies about the importance of innovation as a strategic driver of growth.

It’s time to acknowledge that innovation (or lack thereof) is a choice and expect companies to own that choice and act and invest accordingly.

After all, would it be great to stop persevering and start innovating?

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Leading in the Age of Uncertainty

Leave a reply

How to Anticipate and Adapt with Confidence

Leading in the Age of Uncertainty

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

The defining characteristic of the modern business environment is not speed, but volatility. We live in a perpetual state of VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity). For many leaders, this constant flux generates paralysis, a desperate clinging to old, rigid plans. As a champion of Human-Centered Change, I argue that this uncertainty is not a threat to be managed, but a resource to be leveraged. The true differentiator of effective leadership today is the ability to move beyond mere reactivity and cultivate a proactive culture of Anticipatory Adaptation.

Anticipatory Adaptation is the fusion of foresight and flexibility. It recognizes that in a world where AI, geopolitics, and customer demands shift monthly, the most dangerous strategy is having no strategy for change itself. It’s about building an organizational immune system that can detect weak signals, prototype rapid responses, and maintain psychological safety throughout the process. This approach is the engine that keeps Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire to burn brightly, even through the fog of the unknown.

The Three Pillars of Anticipatory Leadership

To lead confidently amidst the chaos, we must operationalize foresight and agility across three interconnected domains:

1. Institutionalizing Weak Signal Detection

Most organizations are blind to the future because they only listen to strong, incumbent signals — the loudest customers, the direct competitors, the latest earnings reports. Proactive leaders institutionalize the detection of weak signals — the faint, emerging trends on the periphery of their industry. This means empowering diversity of thought and challenging the organizational echo chamber. Who is talking to the fringe users? Who is monitoring the startup ecosystem that could completely disrupt your business model? This exercise, often facilitated through tools like FutureHacking sessions, turns passive watching into active, strategic reconnaissance.

2. Prioritizing Minimum Viable Actions (MVAs)

Uncertainty creates risk aversion, leading to large, slow, ‘bet-the-farm’ projects. The adaptive leader breaks down major strategy into small, rapid, reversible experiments—Minimum Viable Actions (MVAs). The goal of an MVA isn’t scale; it’s learning. MVAs are designed to test the underlying assumptions of a trend or a threat with minimal resource commitment. By running five small, fast experiments instead of one huge pilot, you dramatically accelerate your learning curve and reduce the cost of failure. Speed of learning is the only sustainable competitive advantage in an uncertain age.

3. Anchoring Decision-Making in Purpose

When the environment is stable, processes guide decisions. When the environment is volatile, processes break down. The only constant anchor is a clear, shared purpose. The human-centered leader ensures every team member understands the organizational Why—the mission that transcends quarterly earnings. When faced with an unforeseen threat or a pivot opportunity, team members can independently and rapidly make aligned decisions because they share a common moral and strategic filter. This decentralized, purpose-driven decision-making is the ultimate expression of empowered agency in an uncertain world.

Case Study 1: The Retailer’s Digital Pivot

A major brick-and-mortar retailer with a strong regional presence was initially slow to adopt e-commerce. As the pandemic hit, they faced imminent closure. Traditional leadership might have panicked and attempted a massive, desperate digital overhaul, likely failing due to speed and cost.

Instead, the new leadership team adopted an Anticipatory Adaptation approach. They didn’t try to build Amazon overnight. Their weak signal detection—which they had instituted pre-crisis—had already flagged the rapid shift toward local delivery apps. Their MVA focused solely on testing one assumption: Could their existing store associates execute high-quality, local, last-mile delivery? They launched a pilot within 72 hours, integrating with a single local courier service, manually tracking results. When the MVA proved successful, they rapidly scaled the model, granting each store manager the agency to customize the local delivery integration based on their specific community needs.

By focusing on speed of learning with MVAs and leveraging their existing human assets (store associates), they successfully transformed their physical stores into micro-distribution centers, not only surviving the crisis but gaining market share by offering hyperlocal service that larger competitors couldn’t match. Their success was a product of small, rapid adaptations, not a sweeping, rigid plan.

Case Study 2: Hacking the Climate Risk

I worked with a global utility provider whose core infrastructure faced rising climate-related risks (severe storms, heat waves). The traditional response was a twenty-year capital expenditure plan. While necessary, it was too slow for the pace of change.

We instituted a futurology program centered on uncertainty. We didn’t ask, “What will the weather be?” but “What if the worst-case scenario happened five years early?” This forced cross-functional teams (engineering, finance, public relations, and frontline operations) to anticipate cascading failures. The MVA derived from this exercise was a decentralized Rapid Response Kit—a set of pre-approved procedures, pre-allocated minor budgets, and pre-trained local teams empowered to deploy immediate, tactical infrastructure solutions (like temporary microgrids) without waiting for C-suite sign-off during a crisis.

The result was a cultural shift from passive risk management to proactive resilience. The utility didn’t eliminate the climate risk, but they drastically reduced the time between recognizing a threat and taking decisive, purpose-aligned action. Their improved response times during subsequent extreme weather events saved millions in recovery costs and significantly boosted public trust, illustrating how empowering people to act within a purpose framework is the most effective defense against uncertainty.

“Confidence in an uncertain world isn’t about knowing the answer; it’s about trusting your organization’s ability to learn faster than the pace of change. Trust comes from human empowerment, not rigid control.”

The Adaptive Leader’s Next Steps

Leading with confidence in this environment means shifting your leadership focus:

Audit Your Blind Spots: Dedicate resources to actively seek and discuss weak signals that challenge your current success model. What customer are you losing that you aren’t talking about?
Institutionalize Rapid Testing: Require every major strategic initiative to be broken down into three to five low-cost, reversible MVAs. Celebrate the learning derived from failed experiments, not just the success of the winners.
Embrace Humility: Recognize that the smartest person is the network, not the individual leader. Your job is to facilitate learning, remove organizational friction, and anchor everyone in the shared purpose so they can adapt locally and autonomously.

Uncertainty tests the structural integrity of every organization. The leaders who succeed will be those who trust their people, prioritize learning over planning, and wield Anticipatory Adaptation as their core strategic competence.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

4 Key Aspects of Robots Taking Our Jobs

Leave a reply

4 Key Aspects of Robots Taking Our Jobs

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

A 2019 study by the Brookings Institution found that over 61% of jobs will be affected by automation. That comes on the heels of a 2017 report from the McKinsey Global Institute that found that 51% of total working hours and $2.7 trillion dollars in wages are highly susceptible to automation and a 2013 Oxford study that found 47% of jobs will be replaced.

The future looks pretty grim indeed until you start looking at jobs that have already been automated. Fly-by-wire was introduced in 1968, but today we’re facing a massive pilot shortage. The number of bank tellers has doubled since ATMs were introduced. Overall, the US is facing a massive labor shortage.

In fact, although the workforce has doubled since 1970, labor participation rates have risen by more than 10% since then. Everywhere you look, as automation increases, so does the demand for skilled humans. So the challenge ahead isn’t so much finding work for humans, but to prepare humans to do the types of work that will be in demand in the years to come.

1. Automation Doesn’t Replace Jobs, It Replaces Tasks

To understand the disconnect between all the studies that seem to be predicting the elimination of jobs and the increasingly dire labor shortage, it helps to look a little deeper at what those studies are actually measuring. The truth is that they don’t actually look at the rate of jobs being created or lost, but tasks that are being automated. That’s something very different.

To understand why, consider the legal industry, which is rapidly being automated. Basic activities like legal discovery are now largely done by algorithms. Services like LegalZoom automate basic filings. There are even artificial intelligence systems that can predict the outcome of a court case better than a human can.

So, it shouldn’t be surprising that many experts predict gloomy days ahead for lawyers. Yet the number of lawyers in the US has increased by 15% since 2008 and it’s not hard to see why. People don’t hire lawyers for their ability to hire cheap associates to do discovery, file basic documents or even, for the most part, to go to trial. In large part, they want someone they can trust to advise them.

In a similar way we don’t expect bank tellers to process transactions anymore, but to help us with things that we can’t do at an ATM. As the retail sector becomes more automated, demand for e-commerce workers is booming. Go to a highly automated Apple Store and you’ll find far more workers than at a traditional store, but we expect them to do more than just ring us up.

2. When Tasks Become Automated, The Become Commoditized

Let’s think back to what a traditional bank looked like before ATMs or the Internet. In a typical branch, you would see a long row of tellers there to process deposits and withdrawals. Often, especially on Fridays when workers typically got paid, you would expect to see long lines of people waiting to be served.

In those days, tellers needed to process transactions quickly or the people waiting in line would get annoyed. Good service was fast service. If a bank had slow tellers, people would leave and go to one where the lines moved faster. So training tellers to process transactions efficiently was a key competitive trait.

Today, however, nobody waits in line at the bank because processing transactions is highly automated. Our paychecks are usually sent electronically. We can pay bills online and get cash from an ATM. What’s more, these aren’t considered competitive traits, but commodity services. We expect them as a basic requisite of doing business.

In the same way, we don’t expect real estate agents to find us a house or travel agents to book us a flight or find us a hotel room. These are things that we used to happily pay for, but today we expect something more.

3. When Things Become Commodities, Value Shifts Elsewhere

In 1900, 30 million people in the United States were farmers, but by 1990 that number had fallen to under 3 million even as the population more than tripled. So, in a manner of speaking, 90% of American agriculture workers lost their jobs, mostly due to automation. Still, the twentieth century became an era of unprecedented prosperity.

We’re in the midst of a similar transformation today. Just as our ancestors toiled in the fields, many of us today spend much of our time doing rote, routine tasks. However, as two economists from MIT explain in a paper, the jobs of the future are not white collar or blue collar, but those focused on non-routine tasks, especially those that involve other humans.

Consider the case of bookstores. Clearly, by automating the book buying process, Amazon disrupted superstore book retailers like Barnes & Noble and Borders. Borders filed for bankruptcy in 2011 and was liquidated later that same year. Barnes & Noble managed to survive but has been declining for years.

Yet a study at Harvard Business School found that small independent bookstores are thriving by adding value elsewhere, such as providing community events, curating titles and offering personal recommendations to customers. These are things that are hard to do well at a big box retailer and virtually impossible to do online.

4. Value Is Shifting from Cognitive Skills to Social Skills

20 or 30 years ago, the world was very different. High value work generally involved retaining information and manipulating numbers. Perhaps not surprisingly, education and corporate training programs were focused on teaching those skills and people would build their careers on performing well on knowledge and quantitative tasks.

Today, however, an average teenager has more access to information and computing power than a typical large enterprise had a generation ago, so knowledge retention and quantitative ability have largely been automated and devalued. High value work has shifted from cognitive skills to social skills.

Consider that the journal Nature has found that the average scientific paper today has four times as many authors as one did in 1950, and the work they are doing is far more interdisciplinary and done at greater distances than in the past. So even in highly technical areas, the ability to communicate and collaborate effectively is becoming an important skill.

There are some things that a machine will never do. Machines will never strike out at a Little League game, have their hearts broken or see their children born. That makes it difficult, if not impossible, for machines to relate to humans as well as a human can. The future of work is humans collaborating with other humans to design work for machines.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Innovation Dashboard

Leave a reply

Visualizing the Impact of Your People-First Approach

The Innovation Dashboard

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the relentless pursuit of progress, businesses often fall into the trap of measuring what’s easy, not what’s important. We meticulously track KPIs for revenue, efficiency, and market share, yet when it comes to innovation, our metrics often devolve into vague notions of “idea counts” or “project pipeline.” This is a fundamental flaw, especially for leaders committed to Human-Centered Change. To truly light your Innovation Bonfire, you need a different kind of visibility: an Innovation Dashboard that vividly illustrates the impact of your people-first approach.

Innovation isn’t a solitary act of genius; it’s a collective endeavor fueled by psychological safety, diverse perspectives, and empowered individuals. The challenge isn’t just to innovate, but to prove that investing in your people—their well-being, their ideas, their agency—is the most potent catalyst for breakthrough. This dashboard isn’t just about tracking ideas; it’s about visualizing human potential unleashed.

Beyond Output: Measuring Inputs and Outcomes

A truly effective Innovation Dashboard moves beyond simple output metrics (e.g., # of patents) to encompass both the inputs that foster innovation and the outcomes that demonstrate its impact on both people and profit:

1. Inputs: Cultivating the Innovation Environment

This section quantifies the health of your innovation ecosystem—the conditions that allow people to thrive and create. Key metrics here include:

Psychological Safety Index: Measured through anonymous surveys, pulse checks, or sentiment analysis, assessing how safe employees feel to speak up, challenge ideas, and take risks without fear of retribution. This is the bedrock of innovation.
Cross-Functional Collaboration Score: Tracking the frequency and effectiveness of interactions between different teams or departments, indicating how well ideas flow across silos.
“Purpose Alignment” Score: An internal measure of how well employees understand and connect with the organization’s overarching mission, ensuring innovation is guided by a shared “Why.”
Learning & Development Engagement: Tracking participation rates in skill-building workshops, hackathons, or knowledge-sharing sessions related to new technologies or methodologies.

2. Outputs & Outcomes: Impacting People and Performance

This section links the innovation efforts directly to tangible results, both for the business and for the people involved:

Employee-Generated Idea Conversion Rate: Tracking the percentage of employee-submitted ideas that move from concept to pilot, demonstrating a culture of action and feedback.
Time-to-Market for New Initiatives (Employee-Led): A measure of efficiency for innovations that originated from internal teams, highlighting agility.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) / Net Promoter Score (NPS) Impact from Innovations: Directly linking new products/services to improvements in customer experience metrics.
Employee Retention & Engagement for Innovators: Monitoring how well you retain and engage employees who are actively involved in innovation projects, recognizing that involvement often leads to higher satisfaction.
Revenue/Cost Savings Attributed to Innovation: Quantifying the financial impact of successful new offerings or process improvements.

Case Study 1: The “Engagement to Innovation” Link at a Tech Giant

A prominent technology company was struggling with innovation stagnation despite having a vast R&D budget. Their existing dashboards focused purely on project milestones and patent filings. Recognizing this flaw, the Chief People Officer partnered with the Head of Innovation to create a new, human-centric dashboard.

They started tracking “internal mobility” (movement between teams), “mentorship participation,” and crucially, a “Friction Score” derived from employee feedback channels, measuring systemic obstacles to creativity. They cross-referenced these with traditional innovation metrics. What they found was revelatory: teams with high psychological safety, frequent cross-functional exchanges, and low “Friction Scores” consistently produced higher-quality, market-ready innovations, even if they had fewer initial “ideas.”

The dashboard visually demonstrated that investing in employee well-being and psychological safety was a direct precursor to increased innovation output. This wasn’t just correlation; the data showed causation. It allowed leadership to justify a reallocation of resources from purely project-centric funding to culture-centric investments, proving that a robust internal ecosystem was their most powerful innovation engine. This led to a 15% increase in successful new product launches within two years, directly tied back to improved employee experience metrics.

Case Study 2: Designing for Impact in a Service Organization

I worked with a large, geographically dispersed service organization that needed to rapidly innovate its customer service model. Their initial approach was top-down, but it lacked traction. Human-Centered Design frameworks advocated for empowering front-line employees to drive solutions. To track this, we built a lean Innovation Dashboard focused on Employee-Led Solution Deployment.

Instead of just counting ideas, the dashboard visualized the journey of ideas from conception through pilot to full implementation. Key metrics included: “Time from Idea Submission to Pilot,” “Front-line Employee Participation Rate,” and “CSAT Impact of Employee-Led Solutions.” A critical visual component was a “Feedback Loop Health” indicator, showing how quickly and constructively ideas received feedback, reflecting the psychological safety to fail fast and learn.

The dashboard revealed that localized teams, given autonomy and rapid feedback, were prototyping and deploying solutions significantly faster than centralized initiatives. It highlighted specific branches and managers who were particularly effective at fostering internal innovation. This visibility allowed leadership to replicate best practices, provide targeted support, and, most importantly, celebrate the human architects of change. The result was a 10% improvement in first-call resolution and a significant jump in employee engagement for teams actively contributing to the innovation process.

“You cannot manage what you do not measure, but more importantly, you cannot inspire what you do not make visible. The Innovation Dashboard turns the intangible power of people into a strategic reality.”

Designing Your Impactful Dashboard

Creating your Innovation Dashboard is an exercise in Human-Centered Design itself. It should be:

Visually Intuitive: Easy to understand at a glance, with clear trends and actionable insights.
Balanced: Reflecting both the human inputs and the business outcomes.
Dynamic: Constantly updated and iterated based on what truly drives your organization’s innovation culture.
Empowering: Not just for executives, but for every team member to see their contribution and the collective progress.

By shifting your focus from simply tracking projects to visualizing the health of your innovation ecosystem and the impact of your empowered people, you provide not just data, but a compelling narrative. This Innovation Dashboard becomes a powerful tool for strategic decision-making, stakeholder alignment, and, most critically, for celebrating the human spirit that fuels all true progress.

Image credit: Google Gemini

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How to Drive Fear Out of Innovation

Leave a reply

The Tic Toc Exercise

Drive Fear Out of Innovation

“To Secure Ourselves Against Defeat Lines In Our Own Hands!” — Sun Tzu

GUEST POST from Teresa Spangler

One of my favorite books to pull out in times like these is Thinkertoys, by Michael Michalko. Keeping a fresh eye on what could catch me off guard in times when anxiety and stress could take over all mental faculties if we let it. How might we defeat these feelings that paralyze us: anxieties, stresses, and FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt)?

“Being defeated is often a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.” — Marilyn vos Savant

There is an exercise in Thinkertoys called Tic-Toc. It is somewhat fashioned after building anticipated scenarios of worst-case best case only this builds strength in creating our future realities by addressing the fears that we have head-on. Here is an example of the exercise:

Tic Side- write your fear	Toc-Side-write the opposite of the fear
Customers will never agree to these new ideas?	Customers will really like this idea if I apply myself and engage them in a deeper conversation.
My idea is so out there I will be laughed at	This is a good idea; I will share it as it doesn’t have to be accepted by everyone. If it helps just one person or if one person believes in this idea, they can help others believe in it.
Our leadership team’s plan could be so much better, but they will not listen to me.	I could help my leadership team understand there are additional ways we could approach their ideas and receive even better outcomes.

This seems like such a simple exercise, but it is in fact a very powerful exercise that can have dramatically positive outcomes if you act on the right side of the chart but recognize the left side of the chart. Here you are battling your fears head on, you are training yourself to have more conviction and take actions that may lead you out of challenges seen and unseen. Tic Toc exercises that accompany your written set of worst-case best-case scenarios could be a trigger to new and even innovative thinking.

Innovative thinking, remodeling our businesses, considering what new normal trends will be critical to every business’ survival. Innovation does not get out the door if we have our own self-doubts and no plans of what it really could be if we put our heart, minds, souls to the innovation we believe in and then comes the justifications, the financial modeling and the new potential business models.

If you tell yourself no one will listen, or my ideas are worthless then they will manifest in your gut creating even more anxiety and your greatness may be lost in fear.

Speak now and for NEVER, hold your peace.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Storytelling as a Strategic Asset

Leave a reply

Building a Culture of Shared Vision

Storytelling as a Strategic Asset

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the complex, data-saturated landscape of modern business, leaders often mistake communication for connection. We blast out metrics, strategy decks, and endless transformation roadmaps, yet struggle to achieve true alignment. Why? Because facts inform, but stories inspire. As a proponent of Human-Centered Change, I believe that Storytelling is not a soft skill reserved for the marketing department; it is the single most powerful strategic asset a leader possesses for knitting together a culture of shared purpose and driving difficult, lasting innovation.

Innovation requires people to leave the certainty of the present for the ambiguity of the future. No spreadsheet can bridge that gap; only a compelling narrative can. Storytelling provides the emotional context that turns a complex 10-point plan into a simple, unforgettable journey. It is the necessary fuel for lighting your Innovation Bonfire.

The Anatomy of a Strategic Narrative

A strategic story is not just a recounting of events. It is a structured tool designed to achieve three non-negotiable goals:

1. Establishing Context and the “Why”

Every great story starts with a clear call to action or, in business, a clear articulation of the challenge (the villain) and the opportunity (the treasure). The narrative must define why the change is necessary — not just for the bottom line, but for the customer, the employee, and the broader world. This anchors the change in a higher purpose, making sacrifice feel meaningful.

2. Defining the Hero (It’s Not You)

Effective leaders understand they are the narrator, not the hero. The heroes of the transformation story must be the employees, the customers, or the front-line innovators. When you center the narrative on the team’s potential to overcome the challenge, you foster psychological ownership. People are far more likely to commit to a vision in which they play the starring role.

3. Creating Emotional Residency

Data is processed in the prefrontal cortex; stories are processed across the brain, activating areas linked to emotion and memory. A compelling narrative creates emotional residency — the feeling that the future state is already real and deeply desirable. This emotional connection is what sustains momentum when the inevitable project setbacks occur.

Case Study 1: The NASA “Janitor” Story

One of the most enduring stories of strategic vision involves President John F. Kennedy visiting NASA headquarters in 1962. During his tour, he encountered a janitor carrying a broom and simply asked him what he did at NASA. The janitor’s response was legendary: “Mr. President, I’m helping put a man on the moon.”

This is a masterclass in strategic storytelling. The janitor’s answer wasn’t a product of an operations manual or an HR training deck. It was evidence that the highest organizational mission — the “Why” — had successfully permeated every single level of the organization. The story of landing on the moon was the shared vision, and every employee understood their specific, vital role in that narrative. By anchoring the organization’s purpose in a powerful, common goal, NASA fostered an internal culture of innovation and dedication that transcended job titles and silo boundaries. The story became the operating system.

Case Study 2: Leading Change Through Artifacts

I once worked with a large, traditional manufacturing firm attempting a massive digital transformation, but the mid-level managers were entrenched in the old way of working. The strategy was too abstract — a deck of slides called “Digital 2.0.” To make the change real, we shifted to Human-Centered Storytelling through Artifacts.

Instead of presenting the “Digital 2.0” slides, the leadership team created a simple, physical Customer Pain Map — a large, visual representation highlighting the three most frustrating, friction-filled touchpoints for the customer that the current systems created. Crucially, they accompanied this map with three laminated printouts of customer complaints — actual, raw feedback taken from the call center — that were so painful they were almost impossible to read without wincing.

These artifacts became the new narrative. The purpose of the transformation instantly became clear: it wasn’t about saving money; it was about ending the customer’s pain. The team wasn’t “building Digital 2.0”; they were “fixing the red dots on the pain map.” By making the strategy tangible, emotional, and centered on the customer-as-hero, the leadership bypassed logical resistance and activated empathy, accelerating the shift in operational priorities far faster than any quarterly report could have.

“Data tells, but narrative sells. If you want people to commit to an ambiguous future, you must give them a vivid, emotional story they can step into and own.”

Building Your Storytelling Muscle

How does a leader evolve from a communicator of facts to a champion of vision through narrative? It requires deliberate practice:

Embrace Vulnerability: Start with your own story. Leaders who share their personal “Why” — their own journey and the failure they overcame — build trust and give permission for their team members to be vulnerable, too. This is the foundation of psychological safety.
Gather Front-line Narratives: The most powerful stories live on your company’s front-line. Dedicate time in town halls or team meetings to have employees share a “Hero Moment” — a recent example where they solved a problem that perfectly embodied the company’s stated values.
Simplify the Vision: Can you summarize your entire transformation strategy in a single, three-sentence narrative that your janitor could repeat? If not, the story is too complex. Strip away the jargon until the core conflict and resolution are crystal clear.

Your ability to narrate the future is the core competency of Human-Centered Leadership. By turning your strategic plan into a compelling, human-centric story, you move past mere communication. You create a shared reality, galvanize collective action, and unlock the massive reservoir of human potential needed to win the future.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Cultivating a Culture of Ethical Awareness

Leave a reply

Beyond Regulation

Cultivating a Culture of Ethical Awareness

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s fast-paced digital economy, compliance is often treated as a checklist — a hurdle to clear before launching the next product or technology. We invest heavily in systems to meet GDPR, HIPAA, or emerging AI guidelines. But here is the critical distinction: compliance is a floor, not a ceiling. True, enduring innovation is not just about legality; it’s about legitimacy. As a champion of Human-Centered Change, I contend that the future belongs to organizations that proactively foster a deep-seated Culture of Ethical Awareness, moving beyond regulation to anchor their decisions in shared, proactive moral purpose.

Why does this matter now? Because the speed of technological change — particularly with Generative AI — has outpaced the speed of legislative change. We are in a strategic gap where organizations must choose their own ethical high ground. Ethical failure is no longer just a legal risk; it is an existential threat that can destroy brand trust, talent retention, and market valuation almost overnight. Ethical leadership must become an active design discipline, not a passive compliance exercise.

The Three Pillars of Proactive Ethical Culture

Building an ethically aware culture requires dismantling the belief that “ethics” is solely the job of the legal or risk department. It must be integrated into the innovation mindset through three key pillars:

1. Embedding Ethical Friction in Design

Innovation methodologies often celebrate speed and frictionless iteration. The human-centric leader, however, purposefully injects ethical friction at the design stage. This means making sure the team includes an explicit “Ethical Guardian” or “Customer Advocate” whose job is to pause, challenge assumptions, and ensure that the “can we do this?” question is always followed by, “should we do this?” We must mandate diverse perspectives in the room during prototyping to proactively detect bias and potential societal harm before launch.

2. Making Values a Verb, Not a Noun

Many companies have beautifully phrased values posters. A Culture of Ethical Awareness translates these values into concrete behaviors and decision-making filters. Ethical values must be explicitly tied to performance reviews, promotion criteria, and reward structures. If a team is penalized for delaying a launch due to ethical concerns discovered during testing, the culture fails. Conversely, if a team is celebrated for pausing an initiative to address fairness, the culture strengthens. Ethics must be a verb — something you actively do — not just a noun hanging on a wall.

3. Fostering a Culture of “Courageous Transparency”

Ethical breaches often start small and are exacerbated by internal fear and secrecy. Leaders must cultivate psychological safety that allows employees to raise ethical red flags without fear of retribution. This requires Courageous Transparency — the willingness of senior leaders to publicly acknowledge their own ethical blind spots and the difficulty of complex decisions. When leaders model vulnerability and prioritize the ethical investigation over speed, they reinforce the cultural mandate.

Case Study 1: The Algorithmic Fairness Gap

A major financial services client I worked with was developing an AI-driven lending platform to dramatically speed up small business loan approvals. The system performed brilliantly on efficiency metrics. However, our human-centered audit—focusing on equity as a core ethical value — revealed a systemic issue. The historical training data, collected over two decades, inadvertently penalized newer business models and businesses located in historically underserved zip codes, disproportionately affecting minority and female-led startups.

The system was compliant with current lending laws, but it was profoundly unethical in its outcome, perpetuating historical economic bias. The leadership made the courageous decision to pause the rollout, despite pressure. They didn’t scrap the AI; they redesigned the data intake and verification process to include forward-looking metrics (like projected revenue and business model viability) alongside historical data. By prioritizing the ethical value of fairness over speed, they not only built a better model but cemented their reputation as a community partner, turning a risk into a substantial market advantage.

Case Study 2: The Data Retention Dilemma

Consider a well-known global social platform that faced an internal debate regarding user data retention. The legal team advised that, under prevailing laws, they could legally retain certain anonymized user interaction data indefinitely for the purposes of “future product improvement.” This was compliant and highly valuable for training the next generation of recommendation algorithms.

However, a strong ethical awareness group, comprised of product designers, engineers, and privacy advocates, pushed back. Their argument was human-centered: retaining data indefinitely, even if legal, violates the users’ implicit and explicit expectation of privacy and control over their digital footprint. It created a “data hoard” that represented future vulnerability. The group successfully advocated for the principle of Data Minimalism — the ethical mandate to only retain data for as long as it is absolutely necessary to serve the user’s immediate need. This cultural win led to a high-profile privacy feature being released, reinforcing user trust and creating a significant competitive differentiator based on ethical choice, not just regulatory necessity.

“When technology moves faster than trust, trust always loses. Ethical leadership is the intentional act of slowing down the technological acceleration just enough to let human values catch up.”

Designing the Ethical Future

To transition from a culture of compliance to one of ethical awareness, leaders must make these actions habitual:

The Ethics Review Board is Mandatory: Integrate diverse, multi-disciplinary teams (engineers, ethicists, legal, frontline users) into a standing, empowered board that reviews new technologies and policies with an ethical lens.
Use Ethical Priming: Before major design sessions, start with a simple exercise: define the worst possible ethical outcome of this project. Priming teams to consider the negative consequences sharpens their focus on the proactive moral design.
Hire for Moral Courage: When hiring or promoting, evaluate candidates not just on competence, but on their demonstrated moral courage — their past willingness to speak up, challenge the status quo, and prioritize ethics over expediency.

The challenge of our time is to ensure that the innovations we celebrate don’t inadvertently erode the human values we cherish. The organization that champions Ethical Awareness as a core innovation discipline will not only avoid the inevitable regulatory headaches but will attract the best talent, earn the deepest trust, and build the most resilient business for the future.

Image credit: Google Gemini

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Charting Change for a Successful 2023

Leave a reply

Charting Change for a Successful 2023

Wow! Exciting news!

From now until December 31, 2022 you can get a 50% discount on my latest best-selling book Charting Change – plus FREE shipping!

OR you can also save on the eBook!

You must go to SpringerLink for this Cyber Sale:

The offer is valid until December 31, 2022
Please use HOL50 at check-out to get your discount on books & eBooks*
Free shipping

Click here and enter the code HOL50 before checkout

UPDATE! — SECOND OPTION – You may not get free shipping, but the code PALHC may be another option to try if you are getting the physical book – it’s for 70% off select hardcovers

*This offer is valid for English-language Springer & Apress books and eBooks and is redeemable on link.springer.com only. Titles affected by fixed book price laws, forthcoming titles and titles temporarily not available on link.springer.com are excluded from this promotion, as are reference works, handbooks, yearbooks, encyclopedias, subscriptions, or bulk purchases. The currency in which your order will be invoiced depends on the billing address associated with the payment method used, not necessarily your home currency. Regional VAT/tax may apply. Promotional prices may change due to exchange rates. This offer is valid for individual customers only. Booksellers, book distributors, and institutions such as libraries and corporations please visit springernature.com/contact-us. This promotion does not work in combination with other discounts or gift cards.