Ten Reasons Every B2B Company Needs an Evangelist

by Braden Kelley and Art Inteligencia

The importance of evangelists in organizations around the world is often misunderstood or underestimated, and too few organizations have made the incredibly rewarding investment into one or more of the valuable types of evangelists – who are particularly valuable in B2B organizations for reasons I hope will be obvious by the end. Let’s set the stage.

An evangelist in a B2B company is a passionate advocate for a brand, product, service or innovation. Their role involves spreading the word about the company’s offerings, building relationships, and inspiring others to become customers or supporters. They are often seen as the face of the company, engaging with the community, attending events, and creating content to promote the brand. So, without further delay, let’s look at the top ten reasons every B2B company needs an evangelist:

Increased Brand Awareness: Evangelists help spread the word about the brand, reaching new audiences and increasing visibility.
Improved Reputation: Having passionate advocates can enhance the company’s reputation and build trust with potential customers.
Higher Customer Loyalty: Evangelists are often the most loyal customers, and their enthusiasm can inspire others to stay loyal as well.
Cost-Effective Marketing: Evangelists can provide valuable marketing support without the high costs associated with traditional advertising.
Enhanced Customer Relationships: Evangelists build strong relationships with customers, providing personalized support and fostering a sense of community.
Increased Sales: By promoting the brand and its products, evangelists can drive sales and generate leads.
Valuable Feedback: Evangelists often provide insightful feedback on products and services, helping the company improve and innovate.
Thought Leadership: Evangelists can position the company as a thought leader in the industry, sharing expertise and insights.
Employee Morale: Having a dedicated evangelist can boost employee morale by showcasing the company’s strengths and successes.
Competitive Advantage: A strong evangelist can differentiate the company from competitors, highlighting unique selling points and creating a loyal customer base.

Finding an Evangelist to Hire

If your B2B company doesn’t already have at least one evangelist (see the five types at the bottom), there is no better time than the present to make that first hire, or to hire additional types of evangelists to maximize your success. There is nothing wrong with hiring an evangelist from outside, especially when you don’t want to pull existing employees out of roles they’re already excelling at or when an external hire brings higher levels of skill than the internal resources you think might be best suited to such a role. Here is how to get started with that next hire:

Identify Key Traits: Look for candidates who are passionate, knowledgeable, authentic, influential, and committed. These traits are essential for an effective evangelist.
Leverage Networks: Utilize professional networks like LinkedIn, industry events, and conferences to find potential evangelists. Look for individuals who are already advocating for similar products or services.
Engage with Communities: Participate in online communities, forums, and social media groups related to your industry. Engage with active members who demonstrate a genuine interest in your field.
Job Listings: Post job listings on relevant job boards and websites, clearly outlining the role and its importance. Highlight the impact the evangelist will have on the company’s growth.
Referrals: Encourage your employees and industry contacts to refer potential candidates. Referrals often lead to finding passionate and dedicated individuals.

Cultivating an Evangelist from Within

If you don’t feel comfortable hiring an evangelist from outside, either with or without some level of rotational exposure to all of the different parts of organization, or if you know you have some really skilled and passionate internal resources you think are ready to step into a new role, that’s fine too.

Identify Potential Evangelists: Look for employees who are already passionate about your brand and products. These individuals often go above and beyond in their roles and are enthusiastic about sharing their experiences.
Provide Training and Resources: Offer training programs to help employees develop their evangelism skills. Provide resources such as marketing materials, product information, and access to industry events.
Create a Supportive Environment: Foster a culture of evangelism within your company. Encourage employees to share their ideas and experiences, and recognize their efforts publicly.
Offer Incentives: Provide incentives for employees who actively promote the brand. This could include bonuses, recognition programs, or opportunities for career advancement. (Editor’s Note: Sorry CoPilot I’m not sure I agree with this one)
Engage with Employees: Regularly engage with employees to understand their needs and motivations. Create opportunities for them to share their feedback and ideas.

Whether you hire your evangelists internally or externally it is important to think through how to best introduce and integrate them into every part of the organization relevant to the type of evangelism role they are filling. At this point you might be wondering how there might be more than one type of evangelist, so let’s look at briefly and if you follow the link you’ll learn more details about each.

Here are Five Types of Evangelists to Consider Hiring

In my previous article Rise of the Evangelist I defined five different types of evangelists that organizations may already have, or may want to hire, including:

Chief Evangelist
Brand Evangelists
Product Evangelists
Service Evangelists
Innovation Evangelists

This specialization occurs when the evangelism an organization needs become too big for one evangelist to handle. At that point, a Chief Evangelist creates the evangelism strategy and manages the execution across the team of brand, innovation, and other evangelism focus areas.

I dive more into the role and considerations for companies on how An Innovation Evangelist Can Increase Your Reputation and Innovation Velocity.

What Are You Waiting For?

Evangelism isn’t just a marketing activity. Evangelists are incredibly important to enhancing not just the customer experience, but the employee and partner experiences as well. Not everyone may have main character energy but almost everyone still appreciates main character level credit, and this can be incredibly impactful for all three main constituencies – customers, employees and partners. Tell those stories, translate that value and make the investment into an evangelist today!

Content Authenticity Statement: Some of the lists and paragraphs in the article were created with the help of Microsoft CoPilot, but there are also some paragraphs created by me along with content from some of my previous articles.

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Stop Doubling Down on Bad Ideas

Leave a reply

Stop Doubling Down On Bad Ideas

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

Over the course of my career, I’ve had the opportunity to lead a number of organizations and each one involved a series of steep learning curves. Even the most successful operations do some things poorly, so managing an enterprise involves constant improvement. You always want to figure out where you can do things better.

One way to do that is to identify other organizations that do something well and adopt best practices. Copying what others do won’t make you world class, but it will get you started on the right road. Over time, you can learn which practices are a good fit for your organization and which are not. As you progress, you can begin to develop your own capabilities.

What you don’t want to do is to take bad ideas that have failed try and force them through, yet it happens all the time. Business pundits and consultants don’t stop selling zombie ideas just because they don’t work and people don’t stop getting taken in by slick sales jobs. We need to be much more discerning about the ideas we adopt. Here are some to watch out for.

The War On Talent

When some McKinsey consultants came up with the idea of a war for talent in 1998, it made a lot of sense. In a knowledge economy, your people are your greatest resource. Creating a culture of excellence, rewarding top employees and pruning out the laggards just seemed like such an obvious formula for success that few questioned it.

However, even early on some began to see flaws. Just a few years after McKinsey launched the concept, Stanford’s Jeffrey Pfeffer explained how study after study refuted the “War for Talent” hypothesis. He found that firms who followed the “talent war mind set” ended up actually undermining their people and overemphasizing recruiting from outside.

Even worse, McKinsey’s approach often creates a corrosive culture. By valuing individual accomplishment over teamwork, leaders set up a competitive dynamic that discourages collaboration while sabotaging the knowledge transfer that promotes learning new skills and improves performance. In a New Yorker article, Malcolm Gladwell explained how that kind of competitive dynamic contributed to Enron’s downfall.

The truth is that you don’t need the best people, you need the best teams and that requires a very different approach. Fostering collaboration requires an environment of psychological safety, not a series of performance review cage matches. Talent isn’t something you attract and bid for, it is something you build.

The Cult Of Disruption

It’s become fashionable to say that we live in a VUCA world (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous). The term first arose in the aftermath of the Cold War, when a relatively stable conflict between two global superpowers fragmented into a multipolar multiethnic clash of civilizations. Today, however, it has become so firmly entrenched in the business lexicon that nobody even thinks to question it. Change has become gospel.

If you see the world in turmoil, the only sensible strategy is to constantly change and adapt. Perhaps just as importantly, in a corporate setting you need to be seen as changing and adapting. In this environment, managers have significant incentives to launch multiple initiatives aimed at transforming every aspect of the enterprise.

Yet do businesses really face a VUCA environment? The evidence seems to point in the opposite direction. A Brookings report showed that business has become less dynamic, with less churn among industry leaders and fewer new entrants. Research from the National Bureau of Economic Research found decreased competitive environments. A report from the IMF also suggests that these trends have worsened during the pandemic.

Make no mistake, all of the happy talk about change has a real cost. A study undertaken by PwC found that 65% of executives surveyed complained about change fatigue, and only about half felt their organization could deliver change successfully. 44% said that they don’t understand the change they’re being asked to make, and 38% say they don’t agree with it.

Perhaps not surprisingly, it found that most people have come to view new transformation initiatives suspiciously, taking a “wait and see” attitude undermining the momentum and leading to a”boomerang effect” in which early progress is reversed when leadership moves on to focus other priorities. In other words, we’re basically talking change to death.

Marching On Washington

The March on Washington remains one of the most iconic moments in American history. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have A Dream” speech continues to inspire people around the world. The events of that day surely contributed to the successful passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1965 and made the world a better place.

So it’s no wonder that it seems like every time someone has an idea for change they plan a march. Yet the most salient aspect of over 100 years of marches on Washington is that none, except that one in 1963, have really accomplished much. In fact the very first one, in support of women’s suffrage in 1913, was a full blown disaster.

It’s not just social revolutionaries that make this mistake. Corporate change advocates have their own version of marching on Washington. They set up a big kickoff event to “create a sense of urgency” around change and use stark language like “innovate or die” and “burning platform” to make change seem inevitable.

The problem is that if a change is important and has real potential to impact what people believe and what they do, there will always be those who will hate it and they will work to undermine it in ways that are dishonest, underhanded and deceptive. Creating a lot of noise at the beginning of an initiative, before any real progress has been made, just gives your opposition a head start in their efforts to kill it off.

Closing The Knowing-Doing Gap

Business today moves fast. So we like simple statements that speak to larger truths. It always seems that if we can find a simple rule of thumb—or maybe 3 to 5 bullet points for the really big picture stuff—managing a business would be much easier. Whenever a decision needs to be made, we could simply refer to the rule and go on with our day.

Unfortunately, that often leads to cartoonish slogans rather than genuine managerial wisdom. Catchy ideas like “the war for talent,” “a VUCA world” and “creating a sense of urgency around change” end up taking the place of thorough analysis and good sense. When that happens, we’re in big trouble.

The problem is, as Ludwig Wittgenstein pointed out, “no course of action can be determined by a rule, because any course of action can be made out to accord with the rule.” Rules often appear to make sense on the surface, but when we try to apply them in the real world we run into trouble. We live in a complex universe and oversimplifying it leads us astray.

We need to stop worshiping the cult of ideas and start focusing on the problems we need to solve. The truth is that the real world is a confusing place. We have little choice but to walk the earth, pick things up along the way and make the best judgments we can. The decisions we make are highly situational and defy hard and fast rules. There is no algorithm for life. You have to actually live it, see what happens and learn from your mistakes.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credits: Unsplash

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

3 Keys to Improving Leadership Skills

Leave a reply

3 Keys to Improving Leadership Skills

GUEST POST from David Burkus

Great leaders aren’t born, they’re made. While it’s tempting to look at stories of great leaders and just assume they’re received some divine or genetic gift that turned them into exemplars, the truth is much more nuanced. Leadership is a skill that can be honed and improved with practice and the right guidance. This article will explore three key habits that can significantly enhance your leadership skills: creating clarity, establishing safety, and speaking purpose. These habits are not just theoretical concepts but are based on well-researched findings on what constitutes an outstanding team culture.

Creating clarity involves setting clear goals, milestones, and expectations for the team. This is crucial in a world where teams often operate in an unclear and volatile environment. Establishing safety, on the other hand, means creating a climate where team members feel comfortable taking interpersonal risks, such as disagreeing or sharing ideas. Finally, speaking purpose involves regularly communicating the importance of the team’s work and how it benefits others. This is not just about performance objectives or bonuses but about connecting the team’s work to a greater good.

Let’s take a deeper look at all three.

1. Creating Clarity

In a world where teams often operate in an unclear and volatile environment, providing clarity is a vital leadership skill. This involves setting clear goals and milestones that the team can work towards. It’s not just about setting a big goal, but also about breaking it down into manageable milestones that the team can achieve.

Moreover, creating clarity also involves ensuring that individual roles and expectations are clear. Each team member should know what is expected of them and how their role contributes to the overall goal. This not only helps in avoiding confusion but also ensures that everyone is on the same page, working towards the same objective.

2. Establishing Safety

Establishing safety in a team is about creating a climate where team members feel comfortable taking interpersonal risks, such as disagreeing or sharing ideas. This leadership skill results in teamwide psychological safety. When team members feel psychologically safe, they are more likely to share their ideas, disagree constructively, and contribute to the team’s success.

Leaders play a crucial role in establishing this safety. They can do this by modeling active listening and asking questions when disagreeing, rather than dismissing ideas outright. Furthermore, leaders should enforce respectful behavior and teach team members how to respect each other. This creates a culture of mutual respect and trust, which is essential for a team’s success.

3. Speaking Purpose

Speaking purpose is about regularly communicating the importance of the team’s work and how it benefits others. This leadership skill goes beyond just focusing on performance objectives or bonuses. Leaders should speak to the individual about the meaningful contribution of their work and how it connects to a larger purpose.

By connecting the team’s work to a greater good or benefit for others, leaders can inspire and motivate their team members. This focus on pro-social purpose can drive engagement and commitment, leading to better performance and a more positive team culture.

Conclusion

None of these skills come from genetics, they’re learned. Leaders can significantly improve their leadership skills by focusing on creating clarity, establishing safety, and speaking purpose. These habits are not just theoretical concepts but are based on well-researched findings on what constitutes an outstanding team culture. By focusing on these three areas, leaders can create an environment where everyone can do their best work ever.

Image credit: Pixabay

Originally published on DavidBurkus.com on November 20, 2023

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Why Arguing About Names Matters

Leave a reply

Why Arguing About Names Matters

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

If you want to move in a new direction, you can call it disruption, innovation, or transformation. Or, if you need to rally around an initiative, call it Industrial Internet of Things or Digital Strategy. The naming can help the company rally around a new common goal, so take some time to argue about and get it right. But, settle on a name as quickly as you can so you can get down to business. Because the name isn’t the important part. What’s most important is that you have an objective measure that can help you see that you’ve stopped talking about changing course and started changing it.

When it’s time to change course, I have found that companies error on the side of arguing what to call it and how to go about it. Sure, this comes at the expense of doing it, but that’s the point. At the surface, it seems like there’s a need for the focus groups and investigatory dialog because no one knows what to do. But it’s not that the company doesn’t know what it must do. It’s that no one is willing to make the difficult decision and own the consequences of making it.

Once the decision is made to change course and the new direction is properly named, the talk may have stopped but the new work hasn’t started. And this is when it’s time to create an objective measure to help the company discern between talking about the course change and actively changing the course.

Here it is in a nutshell. There can be no course change unless the projects change.

Here’s the failure mode to guard against. When the naming conventions in the operating plans reflect the new course heading but sitting under the flashy new moniker is the same set of tired, old projects. The job of the objective measure is to discern between the same old projects and new projects that are truly aligned with the new direction.

And here’s the other half of the nutshell. There can be no course change unless the projects solve different problems.

To discern if the company is working in a new direction, the objective measure is a one-page description of the new customer problem each project will solve. The one-page limit helps the team distill their work into a singular customer problem and brings clarity to all. And framing the problem in the customer’s context helps the team know the project will bring new value to the customer. Once the problem is distilled, everyone will know if the project will solve the same old problem or a new one that’s aligned with the company’s new course heading. This is especially helpful the company leaders who are on the hook to move the company in the new direction. And ask the team to name the customer. That way everyone will know if you are targeting the same old customer or new ones.

When you have a one-page description of the problem to be solved for each project in your portfolio, it will be clear if your company is working in a new direction. There’s simply no escape from this objective measure.

Of course, the next problem is to discern if the resources have actually moved off the old projects and are actively working on the new projects. Because if the resources don’t move to the new projects, you’re not solving new problems and you’re not moving in the new direction.

Image credits: Pexels

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Experience Audits Are Crucial for 2025 Success

Leave a reply

Experience Audits Are Crucial for 2025 Success

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In an ever-evolving business landscape, companies striving for success in 2025 and beyond must focus on creating exceptional experiences for their employees, customers, and partners. The traditional approaches to delivering value are no longer sufficient; organizations must re-imagine their strategies to remain competitive. One pivotal approach is conducting thorough INDEPENDENT experience audits, which are not merely about evaluation but about discovering new pathways to elevate interaction and engagement by having a third party actually walk and document the performance of the different aspects of your experiences.

Understanding Experience Audits

Experience audits are systematic evaluations designed to assess and understand the quality of interactions across different stakeholder groups—employees, customers, and partners. They provide a structured approach to examining every touchpoint and interaction, allowing organizations to identify areas for improvement and innovation. These audits focus on enhancing intuitive and delightful experiences, which play a significant role in an organization’s success.

Benefits of Conducting Experience Audits

1. Enhanced Employee Experience

Employees are the heart of any organization, and their experience significantly affects productivity and morale. Conducting INDEPENDENT employee experience audits can uncover pain points related to workplace culture, communication, technology, and work-life balance that internal audits miss or rationalize.

Increased Engagement: When employees feel heard and valued, engagement levels increase, leading to higher productivity and retention. Experience audits illuminate areas where improvements can lead to a more engaged workforce.
Fostering Innovation: By identifying bottlenecks and friction in daily operations, organizations can create environments that foster creativity and innovation.
Improved Well-being: Understanding employee needs and stressors helps tailor benefits and wellness initiatives that improve overall well-being, reducing burnout and absenteeism.

2. Enhanced Customer Experience

Customer experience is a critical differentiator in today’s market. Through independent experience audits, companies can gain a comprehensive and unbiased understanding of the customer journey and identify opportunities for enhancement.

Personalization: By understanding customer preferences and behaviors, businesses can deliver more personalized and relevant experiences that increase loyalty and satisfaction.
Consistency: Experience audits help ensure consistency across all touchpoints, from first contact to after-sales service, building trust and brand reliability.
Innovation in Service Delivery: Recognizing gaps in service allows for innovative solutions that elevate the customer experience, potentially leading to new market opportunities.

3. Enhanced Partner Experience

In a globalized economy, organizations often rely heavily on partnerships to deliver their products and services. Experience audits in this area focus on optimizing collaboration and synergy by identifying which parts of the experience works well for partners and which elements are full of friction or lacking in value.

Streamlined Processes: Identifying and removing inefficiencies in partnership interactions can lead to smoother operations and reduced time-to-market.
Strengthened Relationships: Understanding partner needs and pain points helps cultivate stronger, more beneficial relationships, enhancing cooperation and mutual growth.
Co-Innovation Opportunities: Comprehensive audits can reveal possibilities for co-innovation, where partners work together creatively to develop new offerings or enter new markets.

Implementing Experience Audits

For independent experience audits to be successful, they must be implemented thoughtfully with a structured approach that respects and supports their independence:

Define the Scope: Determine which experiences you aim to audit and the specific objectives that each audit should achieve.
Engage Stakeholders: Involve employees, customers, and partners early in the audit process to gather diverse insights and foster buy-in.
Utilize Diverse Metrics: Employ both qualitative and quantitative metrics to gain a comprehensive understanding of experiences across different touchpoints.
Prioritize Actionable Insights: Focus on insights that can drive immediate and impactful improvements, aligning with overall strategic goals.
Iterate and Improve: Audits should be an ongoing process, with regular evaluations and improvements, to adapt to changing needs and expectations.

Conclusion

As 2025 begins, the importance of independent experience audits in securing organizational success cannot be overstated. By fostering a deep understanding of the interactions that define employee, customer, and partner relationships, businesses are better equipped to create meaningful, positive experiences that set them apart from the competition. In embracing these audits as a fundamental component of their strategy, organizations are not just preparing for the future, they are actively shaping it, and getting unbiased perspectives from the outside the organization to do so.

If you would like to engage me to do an independent experience audit for you across your customer, partner or employee experiences (or all three), please let me know.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Beyond the AI Customer Experience Hype

1 Reply

Beyond the AI Customer Experience Hype

GUEST POST from Shep Hyken

I’ve been writing a lot about artificial intelligence (AI) and the digital customer experience (CX). Many of the executives I interview and the articles I refer to are all about how AI is revolutionizing, changing, helping and sometimes hurting CX. So we’ve heard from experts. How about if we heard from the customers?

That’s exactly what we did in our annual customer service and CX research sponsored by RingCentral. We asked more than 1,000 U.S. consumers about their experiences with AI and digital customer support, and here are the basic findings for 2024:

The Good

Sixty-two percent of U.S. consumers expect that AI (and related technologies) will be the primary mode of customer service in the future. But how about today? As you will see in some of the findings below, not everyone feels AI is ready for primetime customer service and CX.
Thirty-eight percent believe AI and related technologies will lead to more personalized customer experiences. Personalization has been a hot topic for marketing and CX leaders. AI is giving companies and brands far greater capabilities to use customer data to create a personalized experience. Customers enjoy doing business with companies that recognize them and use the information they have to create a better experience.
Forty-nine percent think AI technologies have the potential to improve the overall customer experience. This is good news, however, the next group of findings shows that companies still have an uphill battle to get customers to adopt and embrace a CX fueled by AI.

The Bad

Only 32% of customers have successfully resolved a customer service issue using AI or ChatGPT technologies. That number is low. One theory is that customers often don’t realize AI is what’s behind what they are doing. Some think AI is chatbots and automated voice response systems that interact with them like a human would or should.
Fifty-six percent of customers admit to being scared of technologies like AI and ChatGPT. Some of these customers may have watched movies where computers take over the world or robots go rogue, none of which are grounded in reality. However, some customers simply don’t trust the technology because of past bad experiences.
Sixty-three percent of customers are frustrated with self-service options using AI, ChatGPT and similar technologies. Frustration is different than being scared, but it has the same impact: customers would rather avoid technology and talk to a live human for support and service.

As I studied the significance of these findings as a whole, the overarching theme of why AI has not caught on as a viable and reliable customer support option is inconsistency. Included in the annual study is a finding that 70% of customers choose talking to a live customer service agent on the phone as their primary channel for customer service.

Why? It’s easier, and customers know what to expect when they talk and interact with live agents. What they don’t want to experience is a self-service solution powered by AI that takes them through a series of prompts that eventually lead to a dead end, where they end up having to call the company anyway.

There’s good reason for the fear and frustration. As more customers are exposed to AI and start to understand it, their inconsistent experiences from one company to the next are creating a confidence problem. The latest technology, which is very cost-effective for even small businesses, has not been purchased and implemented by a majority of businesses.

As of the beginning of this year, just 27% of customers think self-service or automated customer support using AI-powered technology can deliver as good of a customer experience as a live agent. That number will eventually go up, although not as quickly as it needs to. Once companies recognize that bad service equates to lost business, they will make the investment to do it right. It’s not an option if they want their customers to say, “I’ll be back!”

This article was originally published on Forbes.com

Image Credits: Unsplash

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Motivate Innovation with These Three Frames

Leave a reply

Motivate Innovation with These Three Frames

GUEST POST from Howard Tiersky

You want to innovate, to drive change in your organization. New products, new processes, new markets, new technologies, new ways of working together.

People in any organization have a tendency to resist change. This is for many reasons including fear of the unknown, fear about how it might impact their role or their empire, or their job security, and the natural tendency that people get comfortable with and attached to the way things are.

More often than not, change requires buy-in from others in your organization, and you will need to be able to communicate a strong reason to change. It’s important to identify the outcome you are seeking, of course. Let’s say you want to improve customer satisfaction. Great! In order for people to really be ready to change, they have to see that outcome as important. Ideally, as essential. If we want people to focus on getting from Point A to Point B, we need to help them understand why that change is so important that it overcomes their natural resistance. Just improving the share price or reducing turnover might not be enough to get someone to be willing to embrace what they may perceive as the personal pain of change.

The question is, “Why is making this change absolutely essential?” Of course, there are an unlimited number of reasons, but in our experience they fall into three primary strategies. The individual details are going to vary situationally, but these are the three basic strategies for igniting that burning platform for change.

If you’ve driven change before or been part of an organization going through change, most likely the change was communicated using one of these three frames. We present them here to make you aware of these three diverse approaches and to give you the opportunity before you communicate your next change to step back and decide deliberately which frame you will choose because each one had its own power and its own drawbacks. Let’s introduce the three frames, and then we’ll explain them. The three frames are number one, we suck. Number two, constant improvement. Number three, environmental change. Let’s review these.

1. The “We Suck” Frame

Let’s start with we suck. That’s a fun one. A company is at the bottom of its industry in sales or share price or both. Customer satisfaction scores are through the floor. The new product which will change the game in the marketplace is three years late. Who am I talking about? Doesn’t matter. When things are bleak, sometimes it seems necessary to just tell the truth and admit that the results you’re getting are bad, unacceptable, and must change. Holding up an honest mirror and pointing out the reality of the situation can create a strong motivation for some kind of change. As I said, everyone wants to get out of a situation where they’re failing. It’s highly motivating to get away from suckiness. It doesn’t have to be the entire company that’s going down the tubes like in my example. It might just be one capability, one product, one process, one geography.

If the facts are on your side, using the frame that, “We have to improve customer satisfaction because right now our customers hate us,” will probably get people’s attention. Often, the pain of failure is enough to overcome resistance to change. The problem with the we suck approach, however, is not hard to guess. It can be highly demotivating, even depressing. It can drive people away from your company. It can be hard to get excited about change when building on a belief that we suck. If we suck so much, how will we be able to improve? How will we make this change successful?

In order for the we suck frame not to backfire, you have to combine it with a strong hope of victory. The team needs to have faith that they can correct the situation. A few tactics. First, highlight the problem in a measurable way and set clear goals. “Our satisfaction scores are at a 6 and they should be at least an 8.” That gives people a clear sense of where the line of victory is. Second, if things used to be better and then they got worse, be sure to highlight that. It creates hope that the organization is capable of better.

A third tactic, highlight the areas the organization is doing well as part of the message. If we’re doing great in four out of five areas, but we suck in the fifth area, be sure to make that point. Not just to be positive, to give sugar with the medicine, but to put the problem in context. “We’re a high-quality organization. We excel in many areas, but in this one respect, we aren’t operating at our own standard.” The key is to show the gap, but also to create confidence that it can be solved.

A fourth tactic, highlight recent changes in circumstance that can also increase confidence. Especially if the problem has existed for a long time. It’s easy for people to feel it’s unsolvable, so make sure part of the message conveys what is change that makes it solvable now? Whether it’s new leadership, a new technology, increased budget, or something else.

2. The “Constant Improvement” Frame

The second frame is constant improvement, an alternative to the we suck frame. This frame emphasizes the need to constantly strive to be better as a value in and of itself. It says, “We’re already at X level, but we can do more. We can drive even more value for our customers. We can lower our costs even more.” This is, of course, a much more positive message than the we suck frame. It doesn’t really on any admission that the current state is any form of failure. However, in order to be motivating, it relies on a certain alignment with the values of your audience.

In some corporate cultures, the value of constant improvement is embodied into the psyche. Places like Apple and Amazon hire people who love to constantly improve, but if your organization does not have this value in its DNA, it’s tough to create it overnight. The downside of the constant improvement frame, therefore, is that it might not be sufficiently powerful in many cultures. People might think, “Yeah, it’s nice to improve, but I kind of like my organization the way it is now.” If the change is not seen as a must, just a nice to have, and if it requires some pain or a scary change, people might not be sufficiently motivated. They’ll tend to embrace small-scale change that doesn’t upset the apple cart, but may still have significant resistance to significant change.

3. The “Environmental Change” Frame

The third and last frame is environmental change. This is my personal favorite frame. The environmental frame says, “Something major in our business environment has changed and we must respond and change in order to survive or thrive. Our customers have all gone mobile. Competitive pricing has dropped our price in half. The population is aging. The Asian market is opening up.” What’s great about this frame is that it excuses the past. We can say, “Hey, what we did in the past was great for the circumstances that existed then, but now we need to change to what will work now and in the future.” In this frame, we don’t suck, we’re just becoming a bit out-of-date and need to adjust to the external change, but the changes are truly a must. Not just to meet the standard of constant improvement as in frame two, but in order to survive. This sort of example is, of course, where the phrase “burning platform” comes from. Your house is all of a sudden on fire. The environment has changed. You have to move.

As I mentioned, I like this third one the best since it can be a positive message and still have urgency, but it may at first appear that this really only relevant in certain circumstances. Those where there really has obviously been a significant environmental change, but you can really leverage this frame or, in fact, any of these frames in almost any situation. The key to using this frame is to do one or both of two things. Either find an environmental change that you can focus on to justify the change, and usually there is almost always some form of environmental change or forecasted change that you can use to create change based on an environmental frame, or create an environmental change.

For example, a new boss coming in can be an environmental change. The new boss has new expectations. We as a department need to deliver in a different way than we have before. There are many other ways to create environmental change. A new brand promise, a new performance management protocol, even a new goal or initiative that the company has that must be met.

Here at FROM, we work with clients all the time to make change successful and part of the work we do is about developing the frame for and communication about the change. I can assure you that there are lots of ways to apply creativity, to utilize the best frame in just about any circumstance with all your digital innovation, for change, for innovation.

This article originally appeared on the Howard Tiersky blog

Image Credits: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Change Marketing versus Change Communications

Leave a reply

Change Marketing versus Change Communications

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the ever-evolving landscapes of business and organizational growth, the paradigms of change management play a crucial role in steering the ship towards success. Within this realm, two concepts frequently emerge as tools to navigate turbulent waters: Change Marketing and Change Communications. At first glance, they may appear synonymous, but understanding their distinct roles and synergies is essential for orchestrating impactful transformations. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I aim to dissect these terms and provide clarity on how they can be leveraged to drive meaningful change.

Understanding the Concepts

Change Communications

Change Communications is the strategic dissemination of information related to a specific change initiative within an organization. It aims to inform, educate, and engage the stakeholders by providing them with accurate, consistent, and timely information. The primary objective of Change Communications is to reduce uncertainty, clarify doubts, and streamline the transition process. A well-executed communication plan addresses the who, what, where, when, and why of the change initiative. It takes into account the different perspectives of stakeholders and ensures that messages resonate with their specific concerns and expectations.

Change Marketing

On the other hand, Change Marketing borrows principles from traditional marketing but adapts them to promulgate change initiatives within an organization. It applies marketing techniques such as segmenting, targeting, positioning, and promotion to make the change appeal to the organization’s internal audience. At its core, Change Marketing is about building buy-in, excitement, and advocacy for change among employees. It focuses on raising awareness about the benefits of the change, cultivating a positive perception, and driving behavioral commitment. By framing the change as a product or service, Change Marketing positions the change initiative into a more relatable and consumable format.

Exploring the Differences

While both Change Marketing and Change Communications aim to facilitate change, their methodologies and focus areas differ in several key ways:

1. Objective

Change Communications is largely informative. Its purpose is to keep stakeholders informed and aligned throughout the change process. Change Marketing, meanwhile, takes a sales-oriented approach, persuading stakeholders to not only understand but also actively embrace and champion the change initiative.

2. Approach

Change Communications focuses on transparency and clarity, ensuring that the message is communicated consistently and accurately. Change Marketing employs creative and emotional appeals. It seeks to create a narrative or brand around the change, appealing to the emotional and psychological drivers of the stakeholders.

3. Tools and Channels

The tools and channels used in Change Communications typically include newsletters, emails, intranet updates, and formal meetings. These are factual and structured to ensure clarity. In contrast, Change Marketing may employ more dynamic and engaging tools such as storytelling, testimonials, videos, events, and interactive workshops, often leveraged through multiple platforms to create touchpoints.

4. Stakeholder Engagement

Change Communications tends to be more authoritative, with information flowing top-down from leadership to the employees. Change Marketing, however, is more collaborative. It encourages two-way communication and feedback loops, empowering stakeholders to be co-creators of the change narrative.

Synergizing Both Approaches

Leveraging Change Marketing and Change Communications together can create a more cohesive and comprehensive change strategy, enhancing the likelihood of successful transformation. Here’s how they can be integrated:

Create a Strong Narrative

Weave a compelling narrative that not only communicates the facts but also makes the change relatable and engaging. Use Change Communications to set the foundation and establish baseline understanding, and then layer on Change Marketing to breathe life into the story, making it resonate on a personal level.

Segment and Personalize

Different stakeholders have varying needs, concerns, and levels of influence. Change Marketing enables you to segment your audience and customize messages, while Change Communications ensures that these tailored messages are coherent and aligned with overall objectives.

Foster Participation and Ownership

Encourage a participatory culture where stakeholders feel they have a voice in the change process. Use Change Communications to set up structured feedback mechanisms, and leverage Change Marketing to create invitations and spaces for dialogue and co-creation.

Measure and Adapt

Both approaches require measurement to understand effectiveness and areas for improvement. Use analytics from communications channels to evaluate engagement levels and adjust strategies; similarly, use marketing metrics to assess buy-in and adapt campaigns to enhance impact.

Conclusion

Change Marketing and Change Communications are both pivotal elements of successful change management, each offering unique contributions towards achieving a transformative vision. By understanding the distinct roles they play and harnessing their complementary strengths, organizations can navigate change with agility and finesse. This dual-approach not only smooths the transition process but also builds a resilient and engaged workforce ready to face the future.

In embracing both pathways, leaders can foster a culture of empathy, insight, and innovation, where change is not merely communicated but sold as an exciting journey toward a better tomorrow.

In closing, I encourage all change leaders and enthusiasts to continuously pursue learning and adaptation. Engage with new methodologies, share your stories, and remain open to experimentation. The future of change management rests in our ability to be both innovative and empathetic facilitators of transformation. One great place to start is to get a copy of Braden’s best-selling book Charting Change, which is now in its Second Edition with several new chapters!

And, if you need help marketing your change, please let me know.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

We Need a New Language for Change

1 Reply

We Need a New Language for Change

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

If innovation (the term) is dead and we will continue to engage in innovation (the activity), how do we talk about creating meaningful change without falling back on meaningless buzzwords? The answer isn’t finding a single replacement word – it’s building a new innovation language that actually describes what we’re trying to achieve. Think of it as upgrading from a crayon to a full set of oil paints – suddenly you can create much more nuanced pictures of progress.

The Problem with One-Size-Fits-All

We’ve spent decades trying to cram every type of progress, change, and improvement into the word “innovation.” It’s like trying to describe all forms of movement with just the word “moving.” Sure, you’re moving but without the specificity of words like walking, running, jumping, bounding, and dancing, you don’t know what or how you’re moving or why.

That’s why using “innovation” to describe everything different from today doesn’t work.

Use More Precise Language for What and How

Before we throw everything out, let’s keep what actually works: Innovation means “something new that creates value.” That last bit is crucial – it’s what separates meaningful change from just doing new stuff for novelty’s sake. (Looking at you, QR code on toothpaste tutorials.)

But, just like “dancing” is a specific form of movement, we need more precise language to describe what the new value-creating thing is that we’re doing:

Core IMPROVEMENTS: Making existing things better. It’s the unglamorous but essential work of continuous refinement. Think better batteries, faster processors, smoother processes.
Adjacent EXPANSIONS: Venturing into new territory – new customers, new offerings, new revenue models, OR new processes. It’s like a restaurant adding delivery service: same food, new way of reaching customers.
Radical REINVENTION: Going all in, changing multiple dimensions at once. Think Netflix killing its own DVD business to stream content they now produce themselves. (And yes, that sound you hear is Blockbuster crying in the corner.)

Adopt More Sophisticated Words to Describe Why

Innovation collapsed because innovation became an end in and of itself. Companies invested in it to get good PR, check a shareholder box, or entertain employees with events.

We forgot that innovation is a means to an end and, as a result, got lazy about specifying what the expected end is. We need to get back to setting these expectations with words that are both clear and inspiring

Growth means ongoing evolution
Transformation means fundamental system change (not just putting QR codes on things)
Invention means creating something new without regard to its immediate usefulness
Problem Solving means finding, creating, and implementing practical solutions
Value Creation means demonstrating measurable and meaningful impact

Why This Matters

This isn’t just semantic nitpicking. Using more precise language sets better expectations, helps people choose the most appropriate tools, and enables you to measure success accurately. It’s the difference between saying “I want to move more during the day” and “I want to build enough endurance to run a 5K by June.”

What’s Next?

As we emerge from innovation’s chrysalis, maybe what we’re becoming isn’t simpler – it’s more sophisticated. And maybe that’s exactly what we need to move forward.

Drop a comment: What words do you use to describe different types of change and innovation in your organization? How do you differentiate between what you’re doing and why you’re doing it?

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Picking Your Future

Leave a reply

Picking Your Future

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Understanding the Spectrum of Futures

In the ever-evolving landscape of business, the ability to envision and navigate the future is increasingly a competitive advantage. Yet, the future is not a singular path but a spectrum of possibilities, each varying in probability, desirability, and preventability. To lead effectively, it is crucial for executives and innovators to understand these different futures: possible, probable, preferable, and preventable.

Possible Futures

The universe of possible futures encompasses everything that could happen, no matter how improbable. This is the realm of the imaginable, constrained only by the laws of physics and the boundaries of creativity. Within the context of business, possible futures include every potential evolution of markets, technologies, consumer preferences, and competitive landscapes.

Fostering a culture of innovation demands a deliberate dive into the pool of possible futures. By encouraging ‘what if’ scenarios, companies can identify seeds of new opportunities before they become obvious. This exploration is akin to maintaining a portfolio of diverse ideas, some of which may become instrumental in leading tomorrow’s markets.

Probable Futures

Probable futures are those that are likely to occur based on current trends, data, and trajectory analysis. They represent the linear extension of the present, framed by existing dynamics in the environment. These futures are extrapolations of known variables and are often the focus of traditional strategic planning.

Businesses often default to planning for probable futures as they seem the most tangible and secure. Metrics, trends analyses, and forecasts become key tools. However, being solely grounded in probable futures can lead to a kind of strategic myopia where emerging disruptions are overlooked. The challenge lies in balancing attention to prevalent trends while scanning the horizon for outliers and black swans.

Preferable Futures

Preferable futures are those that are aligned with an organization’s goals, values, and vision. They harness aspirations and ideals, focusing on what stakeholders desire to achieve rather than solely on what seems likely or possible. Building a preferable future involves intentional strategy making and often requires significant change and innovation.

Designing a preferable future necessitates a comprehensive understanding of organizational strengths, stakeholder aspirations, and societal impact. It involves setting ambitious goals and reverse-engineering the steps needed to achieve these aspirations. Cultivating a mindset oriented towards preferable futures requires organizations to embed vision-driven leadership and to empower employees to innovate in alignment with their collective goals.

Preventable Futures

Preventable futures are those undesirable outcomes that an organization seeks to avoid. These futures could stem from risk factors such as technological obsolescence, reputational damage, regulatory changes, or shifts in consumer sentiment. Identifying and mitigating preventable futures involves risk management and robust contingency planning.

A proactive approach to preventable futures requires resilience-building across the organization. Companies need to cultivate a deep understanding of potential threats, build adaptive strategies, and institute flexible processes to pivot rapidly when necessary. Scenario planning and regular stress-testing of systems and strategies become essential practices in this effort.

The Interplay of Futures in Business Strategy

While these classes of futures can be analyzed individually, the true power of foresight in business emerges from understanding their interplay. Strategic foresight involves dynamically engaging with all four types of futures, continually shifting focus according to the context and strategic needs of the organization.

Analysis of Possible Futures: Encourages broad ideation, innovation, and discovery of novel opportunities and threats.
Focus on Probable Futures: Provides a foundation for realistic planning and sets benchmarks and expectations.
Establishment of Preferable Futures: Aligns strategy with vision and values, guiding purposeful action and innovation.
Mitigation of Preventable Futures: Ensures preparedness, resilience, and sustainability by addressing potential risks and challenges.

As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I advocate for organizations to embrace all forms of futures thinking as an integral component of strategic planning. By doing so, they can cultivate adaptive resilience and align their trajectory with both pragmatic and bold aspirations.

Conclusion: Crafting a Futures-Ready Organization

In a world characterized by rapid change, the foresight discipline of distinguishing between possible, probable, preferable, and preventable futures is invaluable. This holistic approach to the future enables businesses to anticipate change, harness opportunities, and avoid pitfalls with agility and wisdom.

Ultimately, the goal is to craft an organization that is futures-ready—equipped to leverage the creativity of possible futures, grounded in the realism of probable futures, driven by the vision of preferable futures, and protected against the hazards of preventable futures. In achieving this balance, businesses can chart a path towards sustained success and meaningful impact in a world that never stands still.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.