Category Archives: Leadership

Building a Vision for Innovation

Leadership Lessons

Building a Vision for Innovation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s rapidly evolving world, organizations that foster a culture of innovation tend to stand out and achieve sustained success. However, the journey towards innovation is not always clear-cut. It requires bold leadership, strategic vision, and an openness to change. As a thought leader in human-centered change and innovation, I believe that building a vision for innovation requires more than a mere declaration of intent—it necessitates actionable leadership lessons that can guide organizations to transform ideas into reality.

The Essence of Visionary Leadership

Visionary leadership is about setting a clear, inspiring, and audacious direction for the future. It’s about seeing beyond the current horizon and rallying the organization around a shared purpose. Here are some distilled leadership lessons to help build a vision for innovation:

“The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” – Alan Kay

Define a Compelling Why: Before embarking on an innovation journey, articulate why it matters. The purpose of innovation should resonate with all stakeholders and provide a compelling reason to invest time and resources.
Create a Culture of Curiosity and Experimentation: Encourage questions and curiosity. Provide safe spaces for experimentation and accept failure as part of the learning process.
Empower Cross-Functional Collaborations: Break down silos within the organization. Leverage diverse teams and their collective expertise and creativity.
Lead with Empathy: Understand the needs and emotions of employees and customers. Empathize with their challenges and design solutions that meet real human needs.
Foster Continual Learning: Accelerate knowledge sharing and learning at all levels. Keep up with trends and technology, and ensure ongoing employee development.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: LEGO’s Rebirth through Open Innovation

In the early 2000s, LEGO faced a crisis with declining sales and rising competition. Leadership recognized the need for a turnaround, but conventional strategies seemed inadequate. By re-envisioning its innovation approach, LEGO tapped into the power of open innovation. The company embraced collaboration with fans, encouraged customer-driven development, and leveraged digital platforms to co-create products.

This shift towards open innovation became a pivotal leadership lesson. By using LEGO Ideas, a platform inviting users to propose new ideas, the company transformed the innovation process from a closely guarded secret to an inclusive movement. This approach led to the creation of popular products like the LEGO Minecraft series, directly initiated by users. LEGO’s renewed success teaches us the value of openness, collaboration, and co-creation in driving innovation.

Case Study 2: Tesla’s Visionary Pursuit of Clean Energy

Tesla under the leadership of Elon Musk has redefined the automobile and energy sector with its ambitious vision for a sustainable future. Musk’s leadership lesson centers on bold risk-taking and a relentless pursuit of a grand vision. From the start, Tesla positioned itself not just as a car manufacturer but as a pioneer of a clean energy revolution.

Tesla’s unwavering commitment to its vision is evident in its continuous investments in gigafactories, battery technology, and even solar energy products. It has disrupted traditional automotive paradigms and brought electric vehicles into the mainstream. Tesla’s journey exemplifies how a concrete, aspirational vision coupled with strategic leadership can galvanize teams and revolutionize industries.

Conclusion

Building a vision for innovation is both an art and a science. It requires leaders to be dreamers and doers, visionaries and pragmatists. The essential leadership lessons highlighted in this article, together with real-world examples, demonstrate that successful innovation requires a clear vision, unyielding determination, and the courage to engage with the unknown. As leaders, we must envision the impossible, pursue it relentlessly, and inspire others to join us on this transformative journey.

SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovation and the Scientific Method

Leave a reply

Innovation and the Scientific Method

GUEST POST from Jesse Nieminen

Most large organizations are led and managed very systematically, and they pride themselves on that. Managers and leaders within those organizations are usually smart, educated, and want to make data-driven, evidence-based decisions.

However, when it comes to innovation, that can be a part of the problem as Clayton Christensen famously pointed out.

Many leaders these days are well aware of the problem, but even if they are, they may still have a hard time leading innovation because the approach is so different from what most of them are used to in their day-to-day. The mindset, mental models and frameworks needed are just fundamentally different.

So, to get it right, you need to pick out the right frameworks and mental models and use those to lead both your own thinking, as well as your teams. Because innovation has become such a hot topic, there’s been an explosion in the number of these. So, how do you know which ones to adopt?

Well, in these situations, it’s often beneficial to take a step back and go to the roots of the phenomenon to figure out what the timeless fundamentals are, and what’s just part of the latest fad.

So, in this article, we’ll look at arguably the oldest innovation framework in the world, the scientific method. We’ll first explore the concept and briefly compare it to more modern frameworks, and then draw some practical takeaways from the exercise.

What is the scientific method and how does it relate to innovation?

Most of us probably remember hearing about the scientific method, and it’s generally seen as the standard for proving a point and for exploring new phenomena. Having said that, given that even to this day, there still isn’t a clear consensus on what the scientific method actually is, it’s probably a good idea to explore the term.

The scientific method is a systematic, iterative, and primarily empirical method of acquiring knowledge.

Some of the key ideas behind the scientific method actually date back to ancient times and several different cultures, perhaps most famously to Ancient Greece. The initial principles evolved gradually throughout the years, but it took until the Enlightenment before the term “scientific method” began to be used, and these principles became popularized.

With that background we can safely call the scientific method the oldest innovation framework in the world. In the end, applying this method is where most of the big technological innovations and breakthroughs we all now know and benefit from every day, have come from throughout history.

But enough about history, what does the process actually look like? Well, as mentioned, that depends on whom you ask, but the key principles everyone agrees on are that it is a systematic, iterative, and primarily empirical method of acquiring knowledge.

Again, there’s no consensus on the exact steps used in the process, and there are also minor variances in terminology, but the four steps practically every version seems to have can be seen from the chart below.

Scientific Method Chart

While traditionally the scientific method has been used primarily for basic research, it’s been the inspiration for many recent, popular processes and frameworks around business innovation.

Just look at Lean Startup, Design Thinking, Growth Hacking, Discovery Driven Growth, and the list goes on.

At a high level, most of these are very similar to the scientific method, just applied to a more specific domain, and that come with some practical guidelines for applying said methods in practice.

With so many similarities, there’s clearly something there that’s worth paying attention to. Let’s next dive deeper to understand why that is the case.

Why are the frameworks so similar?

By definition, innovation is about creating and introducing something new. Sometimes that can mean small, incremental changes, but often we’re talking something much bigger.

And, in today’s globalized, hyperconnected and rapidly moving world, a lot of volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA) will always be involved, especially when you’re moving into these uncharted waters.

This leads to two fundamental problems:

You usually can’t have all the information before making a decision
Whatever plans and assumptions you initially make will likely be wrong

What that in turn means is that many of the practices and frameworks leaders have applied for years in managing people and projects as they’ve risen through the ranks of the business, will not be applicable here. In fact, they can even be counterproductive as we pointed out in the introduction. Some leaders have a hard time accepting this and adapting to the new reality, and that usually doesn’t end well.

Humility and pragmatism are key for innovation

On the other hand, some leaders that have realized this have decided to go to the other extreme. They’ve heard stories of these great visionaries and innovators that had a dream of the future and just refused to take no for an answer. While there is a lot to like in that approach, the mistake that often happens is that once these leaders embark on that journey, they refuse to adapt their vision to meet the reality.

Finding the right balance is always tricky, but what helps with that is adapting the iterative, exploratory, and empirical approach of the scientific methodand the other frameworks and processes we mentioned before.

This doesn’t mean that it would be a free-for-all, on the contrary. These processes are in fact systematic and usually quite structured.

The purpose of the scientific method is to create structure and understanding from what seems like an incomprehensible mess.

To put it in another way, the purpose of the scientific method is actually to create structure and understanding from what initially seems like an incomprehensible mess – and that is the foundation that most great innovations are built on.

What can we learn from that?

Let’s now reflect on what that means for the day-to-day job of innovators and leaders managing innovation.

For me, it essentially boils down to three main takeaways. We’ll next cover each of them briefly.

Innovation is a learning process, just like the scientific method

As we just covered, most innovation processes abide by the same key principles as the scientific method. They are iterative, empirical, and exploratory. But they are also systematic, evidence-based, and most importantly, focused on learning and solving problems.

With innovation, your first priority is always to be skeptical of your initial plan and question your assumptions. When you do that and look at the data objectively to try figure out how and why things work the way they do, you’ll unlock a deeper level of understanding, and that level of understanding is what can help you solve problems and create better innovations that make a real difference for your customers and your organization.

To sum up, when you’re trying to build the future, don’t assume you’re right. Instead, ask how you’re wrong, and why. Often the hardest part about learning is to unlearn what you’ve previously learned. This is what’s often referred to as first principles thinking.

“Trying things out” isn’t unscientific or non-evidence-based

We still see leaders in many organizations struggle to admit that they, either as a leader or as an organization, don’t know something.

There’s often resistance to admitting a lack of understanding and to “trying things out” because those are seen as amateurish and unscientific or non-evidence-based, approaches. Rational leaders naturally want to do their homework before choosing a direction or committing significant resources to an initiative.

The scientific method is about learning

However, with innovation, often doing your homework properly means that you understand that you don’t know all the answers and need to figure out a way to find out those answers instead of just trusting your gut or whatever market research you might have been able to scrape together.

“Trying things out” is how more or less every meaningful innovation has ever been created. By definition, there’s always an amount of trial and error involved in that process.

So, if you recognize yourself struggling to embrace the uncertainty, take a hard look in the mirror, be more pragmatic and have the courage to make yourself vulnerable. If you have the right talent in your team, being vulnerable is actually a great way to gel the team together and improve performance.

On the other hand, if you understand all of this, but your boss doesn’t, it might be a good idea to politely remind them of how the scientific method works. While it’s not a silver bullet that would be guaranteed to convert everyone into a believer at once, I’ve found this to be a good way to remind leaders how science and progress really gets made.

Essentially, you need to convince them that you know what you’re doing and have a rational, evidence-based plan purpose-built to combat the VUCA we already talked about.

It requires a different management style

As you’ve probably come to understand by now, all of that requires a very different style of management than what most managers and leaders are used to.

To make innovation happen in an organization, leaders do need to provide plenty of structure and guidance to help their teams and employees operate effectively. Without that structure and guidance, which good innovation processes naturally help provide, you’re essentially just hoping for the best which isn’t exactly an ideal strategy.

However, managing innovation is more about setting direction and goals, questioning assumptions, as well as removing obstacles and holding people accountable, than it is about the way most people have learned to manage as they’ve risen in the ranks, which is by breaking a project or goal into pre-defined tasks and then simply delegating those down in the organization.

The traditional approach works well when you have a straightforward problem to solve, or job to accomplish, even if it’s a big and complicated project like building a bridge. These days, the laws of physics related to that are well understood. But if you’re entering a new market or innovating something truly novel, the dynamics probably won’t be as clear.

Building bridges is complicated, not complex

Also, when it comes to capital allocation for innovation, you can certainly try to create a business plan with detailed investment requirements and a thorough project plan along with precise estimates for payback times, but because odds are that all of your assumptions won’t be right, that plan is likely to do more harm than good.

Instead, it’s usually better to allocate capital more dynamically in smaller tranches, even if your goals are big. This can help stay grounded and focus work on solving the next few problems and making real progress instead of executing on a grandiose plan built on a shaky or non-existent foundation.

Conclusion

The scientific method is arguably the oldest innovation framework in the world. While it has naturally evolved, it’s largely stood the test of time.

The scientific method has allowed mankind to significantly accelerate our pace of innovation, and as an innovator, you’d be wise to keep the key principles of the method in mind and introduce processes that institutionalize these within your organization.

Innovation is an iterative process of learning and solving problems, and succeeding at it takes a lot of humility, pragmatism, and even vulnerability. With innovation, you just can’t have all the answers beforehand, nor can you get everything right on the first try.

When you’ve been successful on your career, it’s sometimes easy to forget all of that. So, make sure to remind yourself, and the people you work with, of these principles every now and then.

Fortunately, there’s nothing quite like putting your most critical assumptions to test and learning from the experiment to bring you down to earth and remind yourself of the realities!

This article was originally published in Viima’s blog.

Image credit: Unsplash, Viima

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Everyone hates to fail, why do you?

2 Replies

Everyone hates to fail, why do you?

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

If you have ever had a significant setback, made a serious mistake, or failed at completing an important task, you will have experienced some kind of deep emotional and visceral, largely unconscious, negative, reactive response to it.

By becoming passively or aggressively externally defensive and blaming and punishing others for the outcome, or by withdrawing internally, and attributing self-blame and self-punishment for what may have happened.

Everyone hates to fail because either type of reactive response stings and causes discomfort, dissonance, sorrow, suffering, and pain since you are feeling ashamed, judged, and shamed by yourself and by others. We need to re-think how we approach and digest failure, to scale and leverage it as one of our 21st-century superpowers.

Sabotaging your chances of success

According to a recent article in Psychology Today, this reactive response triggers your avoidance motivation, which then often exceeds your motivation to succeed!

Describing that the fear of failure causes us to then unconsciously sabotage our chances of success, as well as our ability to cultivate and manifest the superpowers necessary to thrive in the 21^st century.

Self-doubt settles us into a denying the need to experiment, and a reluctance, full of excuses, to experiment further with adopting, iterating, and testing new and novel ideas. Or in taking smart risks, that help you connect, explore and discover and design opportunities for making important and necessary, personal and professional changes.

Pivot and adapt to disruptive events

Yet, our ability to experiment, test, validate and iterate creative ideas is critical to surviving and thriving through the current decade of both disruption and transformation – which more of us are viewing as a series of relentless, continuous, and exponential changes, requiring unlearning and radically new learning processes.

In a 2021 Deloitte survey of 2,260 private – and public-sector CXOs in 21 countries, 60% of the respondents said that they believe disruptions like those seen in 2020 will continue. The resulting challenge is underscored by another of the survey’s findings:

Seventy percent of the CXOs do not have complete confidence in their organisation’s ability to pivot and adapt to disruptive events.

This confidence can be developed by re-thinking how we approach and digest failure, to scale and leverage it as a 21st-century superpower.

Developing 21st-century superpowers

Here are the four key superpowers, to be supported by digital technologies:

Nimbleness: The ability to quickly pivot and move. (“We used to do this, and now we do that.”)
Scalability: The ability to rapidly shift capacity and service levels. (“We used to serve x customers; we now serve 100x customers.”)
Stability: The ability to maintain operational excellence under pressure. (“We will persist despite the challenges.”)
Optionality: The ability to acquire new capabilities through external collaboration. (“Our ecosystem of partners allows us to do things we couldn’t do previously do.”)

Rethinking our fears of failure

None of these 21st-century superpowers can be developed without experimentation and collaboration.

Where you are able to self-regulate your fears of making mistakes and failure, by becoming a smart risk-taker who willingly, stretches the envelope and steps outside of your safety and comfort zones.

This helps maximise your potential and ability to learn and develop in the growth zone, where we stop self-sabotaging our chances of adapting and learning, succeeding, and growing in an uncertain and unstable world.

Everyone hates to fail because it’s hard to self-regulate the basic emotions of disappointment, anger and frustration, and deep shame. Resulting from and the distorted thinking patterns that accompany failure, often immobilising you which results in an unwillingness and inability to disrupt yourself and take intelligent actions.

Slow down to rethink, respond, regroup, play and thrive

It all starts with leading, teaching, mentoring, and coaching people to slow down, to learn, and appreciate the value of taking “time-out” for retreat and reflection.

At ImagineNation, in last week’s blog, we described how this involves developing regular reflective practices, where people can pay deep attention, and learn how to master these basic emotions and unresourceful thought patterns. How this allows them to be playful and experimental in developing new mindsets, rethinking habits, and resourceful emotional states, which are foundational for developing 21st-century superpowers.

Failure can become valued as a process and resource for effecting significant human-centric change, deepening learning, and improving your future fitness.

Consequences of avoiding failure

According to the same article in Psychology today – “shame is a psychologically toxic emotion because instead of feeling bad about our actions (guilt) or our efforts (regret) shame makes us feel who we are”.

By getting to the core of your egos, your identities, your self-esteem, and your feelings of emotional well-being and resourceful thinking habits.

Because everyone hates to fail, we all unconsciously seek ways of mitigating the implications of a potential failure – “for example, by buying unnecessary new clothes for a job interview instead of reading up on the company – which allows us to use the excuse, “I just didn’t have time to fully prepare.”

Benefits of embracing failure

Rather than succumbing to the notion that everyone hates to fail, it is much more useful to develop healthier ways of embracing and flowing with it which might:

Motivate you to reflect deeply to consider and deliberate as to what might be the most intelligent and brave actions to take under the range of circumstances you find yourself in.
Inspire you to risk-taking those intelligent actions through developing sound risk anticipation, management, and mitigation strategies that help boost your confidence.
Commit to doing just a bit more, in inventive ways that add value to the quality of people’s lives as well to your customer’s experience of your product or service.
Encourage you to access your multiple and collective intelligence, be more courageous, compassionate, and creative in co-sensing, co-discovering, co-designing, and co-creating innovative solutions to complex problems.
Enable you to learn from others, and harness people’s collective intelligence to adapt and grow, through teaming, in ways that serve the common good.

Tips for rethinking and self-regulating fears of failure

A few tips to support you to rethink, respond, regroup and thrive that we will explore more deeply, through real-life stories and examples, in our next two ImagineNation™ blog posts (November and December):

Be willing to redefine and reframe failure as what it means in your unique context, review past failures and see if you can find benefits that resulted from them.
Set approach goals and not avoidance goals to view failure as a challenge that can be mastered.
Control the controllable by intentionally managing your mindsets, shifting any negative perspective, and unpacking distortion and generalisations about failures and their negative consequences.
Imagine yourself doing well, achieving your goals by composing and painting a picture or image of a desirable and compelling future success.
Develop healthy self-compassion for when you do mess up, make mistakes and fail, by being kind and understanding, and empathic to your won humanness.
Focus on every experience, no matter what it brings is an opportunity for deep learning and creative and inventive change.

Rather than living in a world where everyone hates to fail, why not adopt the rethink, respond, regroup, thrive pattern, be future-fit and develop your set of 21st-century superpowers in the face of the acute disruption of COVID-19?

Where it is expected that the business environment, over the next three to five years, will be the most exciting and innovative period that many of us may learn from and experience in our lifetimes?

Want to know why you might have a fear of failure?

Participate in our online research study “Ten Signs you may have a fear of failure” which we adapted from the article “10 Signs That You Might Have Fear of Failure… and 2 ways to overcome it and succeed” by Guy Winch Ph.D. in Psychology Today. Click here to access the survey.

We will happily share the results and findings with you if you leave your name and email address on the form provided. By sharing these details, you will also qualify for a complimentary 30 minute one on one online innovation coaching session, with one of our global professionally certified coaches to help you overcome your own anxieties and fears about failure and develop your 21st-century superpowers.

Join our next free “Making Innovation a Habit” masterclass to re-engage 2022!

Our 90-minute masterclass and creative conversation will help you develop your post-Covid-19 re-engagement strategy. It’s on Thursday, 10th February at 6.30 pm Sydney and Melbourne, 8.30 pm Auckland, 3.30 pm Singapore, 11.30 am Abu Dhabi and 8.30 am Berlin. Find out more.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Scaling Agile in Large Organizations

Leave a reply

Scaling Agile in Large Organizations

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In an era where the technology landscape is constantly shifting, large organizations find themselves in a dilemma. How do they remain nimble and innovative while managing complex structures and processes? The answer for many is Agile—a methodology once the preserve of small teams, now being scaled to fit the groundwork of multi-layered businesses. But scaling Agile in large organizations isn’t just about implementing new processes and tools; it’s about fostering a culture shift that emphasizes collaboration, efficiency, and customer-centricity.

The Need for Scaling Agile

Large organizations traditionally operate in silos, with distinct departments managing their own priorities. This often leads to misalignment and inefficiency. Agile methodology helps break down these silos, promoting cross-functional collaboration and aligning teams with the organization’s overall goals. The key to scaling Agile successfully is not merely in extending Agile practices organization-wide, but in tailoring them to fit unique organizational contexts while maintaining the core Agile principles.

Case Study 1: Implementing Agile at Scaled Levels – The Spotify Model

Spotify’s scaling of Agile is widely regarded as a benchmark for large organizations. Recognizing the limitations of traditional hierarchies, Spotify created a new organizational framework that supports agile at scale. They introduced ‘Squads’, which are akin to Scrum teams, emphasizing autonomy and accountability. These Squads are powered by ‘Tribes’ to maintain coherence, and ‘Chapters’ and ‘Guilds’ to foster skill development and knowledge sharing.

By focusing on cultural values and providing a structure that emphasizes trust, transparency, and strong team identity, Spotify was able to enhance its ability to innovate while scaling its business. The success of this model lies in its flexibility, allowing other organizations to adapt it to their own needs and challenges.

Case Study 2: Scaling Agile at Microsoft – The Journey to Business Agility

Microsoft’s transition to Agile was driven by the need to better respond to customer needs in a rapidly evolving market. By adopting agile practices across various product teams, Microsoft sought to improve its development processes and enhance product quality. The journey was not without challenges; initial resistance was expected and encountered.

Microsoft tackled these by investing in comprehensive Agile training programs and fostering a culture of continuous feedback and improvement. They broke down traditional silos and championed cross-functional teamwork, resulting in quicker release cycles and increased innovation.

The transformation at Microsoft underscores the importance of persistence, leadership commitment, and a well-articulated vision in scaling Agile across a large organization.

Conclusion

Scaling Agile in large organizations is more about mindset shifts than merely adopting a set of practices. It requires embracing transparency, collaboration, and a focus on delivering value to customers. The experiences of Spotify and Microsoft highlight the adaptability and benefits of Agile methods but also illustrate the necessity of context-specific strategies and strong leadership.

For large organizations looking to scale Agile, it’s crucial to drive cultural change, empower teams, and remain adaptable to continually refine the approach as new challenges and opportunities arise.

I hope you have enjoyed my attempt to provide a structured and informative perspective on how large organizations can scale Agile methodologies effectively, illustrated with case studies of Spotify and Microsoft.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

All Leadership is Change Leadership

1 Reply

All Leadership is Change Leadership

GUEST POST from Randy Pennington

Taxi companies could have created a ride scheduling and payment app. They didn’t.

There are a number of reasons why it didn’t happen, but the biggest reason was reluctance to challenge the status quo.

The same goes for a host of other companies. Blockbuster’s failure to proactively innovate—or even take the opportunity to purchase Netflix—is one of the most notable. We can’t forget, however, Nokia, IBM, Kodak, BlackBerry, MySpace, and RadioShack.

We don’t know the exact conversations about change in any of these companies, but it is a very safe bet to assume that no one stood up and said, “Let’s do nothing because we want the company to fail.”

We all want our organizations to continually be better. If they are going to be better, we must do at least some things different. If things are going to be different, they have to change.

That makes all leadership, especially in today’s world, change leadership.

Change Leadership not Change Management

Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper famously said: “You manage things. You lead people.”

Unfortunately, the remainder of her statement is often omitted: “We went overboard on management and forgot about leadership.”

That happened with our approach to change, too.

We have gone overboard managing the immense amount of data, projects, and things to be coordinated and corralled in our attempts to “manage” change. It stems from our desire to remove the messiness and bring order to the process of change.

It is a worthwhile objective, but as historian Henry Adams reminded us, “Chaos was the law of nature. Order was the dream of man.”

Change—especially the transformational growth we need today—is always messy. Most important, it is more likely to fail because of faulty leadership rather than faulty management.

Leadership is about influence. Nothing more and nothing less. For our organizations and institutions to flourish in the future, we need more leaders who can influence others to disrupt the status quo.

Disrupting the Status Quo

We come by our desire for order honestly. The human brain appears is hard-wired to value certainty and view uncertainty as a potential threat.

The human application of Newton’s First Law also has an impact. We learned in high school physics that objects at rest tend to stay at rest, and objects in motion tend to remain in motion until they are acted upon by a greater force in the opposing direction.

That explains the why inertia of the status quo exists. It doesn’t actually help you overcome it. Here are four actions you can take right now.

1. Create Emotional Readiness to Counteract Fear

People, organizations, and industries change for one of two basic reasons: crisis pushes them to change, or opportunity pulls them to do so. You occasionally see a combination of both, but there is usually one primary diver. Most of us wait on crisis. If you find yourself there, don’t sugar coat or waste it. Just realize that you are likely to be playing from behind in the marketplace. It’s not that all of those failed and disrupted companies didn’t try anything. It is that they waited for crisis to generate emotional readiness. The best organizations seize opportunities. Netflix jumped from distributing DVDs to delivering its services through a streaming platform even though the company was not in crisis. It wasn’t an easy change, but Reed Hastings created a compelling vision of the future that focused on proactively creating value for the customer rather than playing catch up to survive.

While many people are hesitant to change, everyone wants to get better. The only way to maintain momentum and ensure long-term success in today’s marketplace is a relentless focus on making yourself indispensable to your customers.

2. Provide Involvement and Support

Sending a positive message about seizing the future does not ensure that people will embrace or pursue it. You cannot rely solely on a change communication plan if the goal is to inspire people to take new action. Get everyone involved early and often. People support what they help create, and no one ever argues with their own ideas. Likewise, your team will need training and support. Becoming proficient and comfortable with new ways of thinking and working take time even when there is complete support. Knowing that coaching, training, and support are available helps overcome the fear of incompetence.

3. Tell Positive Stories Early and Often

Facts impart knowledge. Stories create connections and feeling, and feelings inspire people to stick with a change even when doing so is uncomfortable. The elements of a great storyare the same if you are making a successful movie or leading organizational transformation. You need a character with which everyone can identify, a believable plot with a conflict to overcome, struggle, and resolution. Sharing positive stories about real people achieving results helps overcome resistance. More important, it provides a respected counterbalance to naysayers that might try to sabotage your change efforts.

4. Go First

Ross Perot, founder of EDS and Perot Systems, once told me that Leaders eat last, but they go first.His meaning was more than a pithy play on words. Your team is watching. It is more difficult for them to get excited about where the organization is going if they sense reticence from you. Your influence is highest when you model the willingness to pursue change that you want from others.

Change is hard. Resistance, risk, and fear are real. The important decisions and strategies on which you need to execute can be scary. If, on the other hand, there is no resistance, there is no substantial change.

Change no longer influences the environment. It is the environment. Your job is to inspire and influence a culture that continuously challenges the status quo to remain relevant to your customers and stakeholders. That means all leadership is change leadership.

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

You Must Play and Experiment to Create and Innovate

3 Replies

You Must Play and Experiment to Create and Innovate

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

Growing up in the fashion industry, in 1980’s Paris, I forged an exciting global career and experienced, first hand, a diverse range of the most amazingly innovative fashion presentations ever. It was the dawn of an explosive era where fashion really mattered and wonderful events became really fantastic happenings featuring a lot of playful and experimental theatrical performances and fabulous guest stars on the catwalk. “From Claude Montana to Thierry Mugler, from Giorgio Armani to Franco Moschino, from Jean Charles de Castelbajac to Christian Lacroix, there were many designers who shaped the aesthetics of the era with their creations and shows” – whose creativity, still impact us across the arts and other key industries today.

Being playful and experimental

Reinforcing that in the arts and other industries, and in our professional and personal lives, newness, creativity, and innovation only happen through people being willing to be both playful and experimental.

This is useful to know, especially with the range of constraints and restrictions occurring globally as a result of fierce governmental reactive response to managing the Covid-19 pandemic. Coupling these with the challenges and limitations of a remote and hybrid workplace, are combining to cause many of us to achingly long for more freedom, fun, play, and adventure. Yet, many of us, are feeling bound to our laptops, TV’s and kitchens, and are locked within the boundaries of our homes and local neighbourhoods.

It is possible to shift the range of negative feelings that lockdowns produce by exploring possibilities and opportunities for expanding our knowledge and learning, by knowing how to be more playful and experimental, and especially by taking up a set of regular reflective practices.

A unique moment in time

Using this unique moment in time to take up a set of reflective practices to ignite our creative juices and expand our appetite and capacity for creativity.

At the same time, use this moment to explore opportunities to learn and expand our knowledge, because, knowledge plays an important role in the productivity and prosperity of economies, organisations, and individuals and the post-Covid-19 world is going to need a lot of new knowledge in the coming decade of both disruption and transformation.

Expanding our knowledge

Most of us are aware that, our desire to create, and actually be playful and experiential usually involves learning from some kind of direct experience. Like painting, where our hands are likely to get dirty, where we may produce a number of poor efforts (which we often hide) before we eventually create one, we can accept and live with.

Learning from a direct experience is more effective if coupled with reflection – that is, the intentional attempt to synthesize, abstract, and articulate the key lessons taught by experience.

Where research reveals that the effect of reflection on learning is mediated by a greater perceived ability to achieve a goal in that it improves your confidence, self-belief, and conviction that you can achieve it.

Learning from reflecting on experience

Making the learning experience a playful and experimental one allows us to have fun, in ways that engage our multiple intelligences – our cognitive brains, and heart and gut brains in ways that create meta-shifts that challenge our mental maps.

This also helps us develop our learning agility – “learning what to do when you don’t know what to do” especially important in a world of constant and disruptive change.

Which will especially be a very vital and critical skill set to cultivate in the post-Covid-19 world, where there is no playbook, or reliable template for long-term planning the results we might want, in a disruptive and uncertain future.

Starting with elastic thinking

It starts with developing our elastic thinking skills, where according to Leonard Mlodinow – it is now prime time for people to harness the power of “elastic thinking” to navigate an unstable world and underpins our ability to adapt and be creative.

And involves “developing the capacity to let go of comfortable ideas and become accustomed to ambiguity and contradiction; the capability to rise above conventional mindsets and to reframe the questions we ask; the ability to abandon our ingrained assumptions and open ourselves to new paradigms; the propensity to rely on imagination as much as on logic and to generate and integrate a wide variety of ideas; and the willingness to experiment and be tolerant of failure.”

At ImagineNation™ we developed a four-step cognitive process to help people stretch their mental maps, feelings, thinking, behaviours, and actions, enabling them to be playful and experimental by focussing on these key elements that enable reflective practice:

Discovering
Sensemaking
Internalising
Applying

Exploring the role of failing fast

Getting to the creative and innovative outcomes, when playing and experimenting with thinking or acting differently, usually involves some kind of failure, where we fail flat on our faces!

Yet when being brave playful and courageous, and experimenting, you have to be willing to make mistakes and fail. The key is to try out things, and experiment, like children, do, and not worry about what others think and say about you, when you make a mistake or fail.

At the same time, adopting a reflective practice supports our willingness to let go and come from a beginners mind, to unlearn what may have worked previously, whilst being vulnerable and open-hearted, minded and willed to deeply reflect on what happened and what knowledge you may gain and what you might learn from it.

Continuously learning from reflective practice

This means that “work must become more learningful” where an organisations’ or teams’ collective aspiration is set free and people have permission, safety, and trust to be playful and experimental.

To “learn by doing and reflecting” through being:

Encouraged to continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire,
Re-educated to elasticize their thinking and develop new mental maps and where expansive patterns of feeling and thinking are nurtured,
Committed to continuously learning how to learn together, at a speed faster than the competition.

Resulting in the intelligence of the organisation or team exceeding the intelligence of individuals in the team and in the organisation, and by harnessing the collective’s capacity to create, invent and innovate through enacting a set of habitual reflective practices.

CCS Cards for play and critical reflection:

As a side note, it’s worth mentioning a tool we like to use that can provide both a sense of play and an opportunity for critical reflection. As many of you may know, CCS Cards are image cards containing a special set of photos, illustrations, and words. Just holding them, sorting them, and talking about what particular cards might mean for you, is an enjoyable, playful activity that often leads to fresh, creative responses.

Furthermore, as a tool for reflective practice, CCS Cards give people a powerful way to recall and recreate their lived experiences by incorporating their feelings and emotions. The cards provide participants with self-selected representations that they can link to all the associated concepts, feelings, words, and actions that were part of the lived experience. Armed with this clearer picture, they are better able to reflect upon and learn from their experience. The cards also provide an easy way to share and compare their reflections with others, which is vital for effective collaboration.

Bringing together theory and practice

Enacting a set of reflective practices helps us effectively bring together and integrate theory and practice, where through reflection, people are able to:

Discover new mental maps, feelings, thoughts, and ideas,
Make sense of these in their own context or situation,
Internalize and assimilate the impact of these mental maps, thoughts, feelings, and actions by introducing options and choices for being, thinking, and acting differently,
Apply that information to add to their existing knowledge base and reach a higher level of understanding,
Adapt how they feel, think and act as resources in new, unknown, unexpected, and disruptive situations, as well as in how they plan, implement, and review their actions.

Surely, these might comprise a helpful set of strategies to embrace to help you thrive in these challenging times?

Isn’t there an inherent opportunity for all of us to discover and explore new ways of having more fun, by being playful and experimental?

Perhaps we might discover new ways of adapting and thriving individually and collectively co-create more individual freedom, wonderful fun, and exciting adventures that we are all craving, and become future-fit, in our constantly changing, uncertain, and unstable world.

Find out more about our work at ImagineNation™

Find out about our learning products and tools, including The Coach for Innovators Certified Program, a collaborative, intimate, and deep personalized innovation coaching and learning program, supported by a global group of peers over 9-weeks, starting Tuesday, February 1, 2022. It is a blended and transformational change and learning program that will give you a deep understanding of the language, principles, and applications of an ecosystem focus, human-centric approach, and emergent structure (Theory U) to innovation, to upskill people and teams and develop their future fitness, within your unique context.

Join our next free “Making Innovation a Habit” masterclass to re-engage 2022!

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Decision-Making Under Uncertainty

Leave a reply

Lessons from Top Innovators

Decision-Making Under Uncertainty

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a rapidly changing world, the ability to make robust decisions under uncertainty has become a defining trait of successful innovators. This capability does not merely hinge on intuition or foresight; it draws from a calculated approach that blends informed risk-taking, flexibility, and an acute sense of opportunity. As we delve into the stories of leading innovators, we uncover key lessons that can bolster decision-making amid ambiguity and turbulence.

Key Principles of Innovative Decision-Making

Embrace Ambiguity: Innovators thrive by accepting that the absence of complete information is not a barrier but a gateway to opportunity.
Prototype and Iterate: Learning through rapid prototyping and iteration helps gauge what works, reducing risks in the process.
Rely on Diverse Perspectives: Diverse teams bring a range of insights, fostering comprehensive decision-making that anticipates various outcomes.
Value of Failure: Treating failure as a stepping stone rather than a setback is essential in refining strategies and inspiring breakthroughs.

Case Study: SpaceX – Launching Dreams Amidst Uncertainty

Elon Musk’s SpaceX is a prime example of decision-making under extreme uncertainty. In the company’s early days, the prospects of commercial spaceflight were riddled with unknowns. The use of Falcon 1 rocket was met with skepticism, three consecutive failures, and dwindling finances. However, Musk demonstrated a profound belief in a calculated approach to risk-taking; he reinvested in refining technologies with a fourth successful launch as the outcome.

The SpaceX team embraced iteration with rigor. Every failure was meticulously analyzed, and the resultant insights were applied to subsequent designs. This culture of resilience and learning has enabled SpaceX to not only survive repeated adversities but also lead in reusable rocket technology, fundamentally changing the dynamics of aerospace sectors. Their unwavering commitment illustrates that embracing failure and preserving a vision are crucial elements of navigating uncertainty.

Case Study: Airbnb – Redefining the Travel Industry

Airbnb’s journey began at a time when the notion of home-sharing was largely unrealized. Founders Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia faced significant uncertainties ranging from legal issues to trust deficits among users. Despite these challenges, they saw potential in leveraging the untouched resource of spare rooms to forge a new market.

Their decision-making process was heavily influenced by flexibility and listening to users. The founders prioritized user feedback, transforming invaluable insights into functional platform changes. To tackle trust issues, Airbnb introduced a review system and a range of host/guest assurances, which significantly increased user confidence and adoption.

This case underscores the importance of responsive pivoting and incremental innovation, which eventually helped Airbnb disrupt the travel industry and establish a new modality of travel accommodation amid initial market skepticism.

Conclusion

Top innovators, like those at SpaceX and Airbnb, exemplify decision-making under uncertainty through their strategic approaches to experimentation, collaboration, and adaptation. By embodying the principles of embracing ambiguity, valuing diverse insights, and fostering an iterative mindset, they navigate uncertainties not as obstacles but as part of the growth process.

As industry leaders continue to face unpredictable environments, adopting these lessons will be central to cultivating robust innovation strategies, sustaining growth, and crafting transformative impacts on the world.

In this article, I’ve featured two case studies — SpaceX’s use of iteration and resilience in rocket development and Airbnb’s strategic adaptation in the hospitality sector. Both scenarios highlight the importance of calculated risk, flexibility, and the readiness to learn from both successes and setbacks, providing valuable lessons on decision-making under uncertainty.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Discipline Has a Role in Innovation

Leave a reply

Discipline Has a Role in Innovation

GUEST POST from Jesse Nieminen

Innovation is, without a doubt, a creative endeavor. However, many people still think it’s all about creativity. There’s a magical a-ha moment, and the rest is history.

Well, as we’ve explained before, that’s just not true. Those that have really been trying to innovate know that there is much more hard work than there is fun and games in the process of creating and scaling an innovation.

Thus, discipline plays a huge role in innovation. In fact, I’d argue that discipline is one of the least spoken about, yet most important factors determining whether individuals and organizations succeed at creating innovations.

So, in this article, we’ll dive deeper into the topic and discuss the role discipline plays in innovation to hopefully help you and your organization do a better job at it.

What is discipline?

As a term, discipline is commonly used to just refer to being strong-willed enough to put in a lot of hard work. In other words, self-discipline.

However, if we look at a dictionary, there are a few distinct but connected uses for the word. One refers to it as a branch of science, skill or type of work, another as the practice of regulating the behavior of people in a system, and the third as a synonym for punishing people for undesirable behavior in that system.

Well, innovation is certainly a discipline in the first meaning of the word, but it’s also one that takes a lot of discipline to succeed at, in the second meaning of the word.

“Innovation is a discipline that takes a lot of discipline to succeed at.”

Let’s dive a bit deeper on that second meaning for the word. For our purposes, we can further divide that it into two categories:

Self-discipline
Organizational discipline

There’s obviously a lot these have in common, but for an organization to succeed at innovation, you need both.

In a nutshell, you need self-disciplined individual willing to put their head down and persist. But you also need organizational discipline to focus on what matters, and to create the incentive structures needed to reinforce all of that.

Why is discipline so important for innovation?

So, with that covered, we can dive deeper into why discipline is so important for innovation and how that happens in practice.

We’ll next cover each of the main points briefly.

Viima Art of Discipline

It takes hard work, persistence, and focus to create an innovation

Because our software is centerer around ideas, we often have to explain that while every innovation starts from an idea, an idea is maybe 1% of the way there towards a real innovation. It still needs development, refinement, implementation, scaling, and so on.

Going through that whole process takes a lot of hard work for pretty much every idea, even if the idea might seem trivial at first. The fact is that by the time you get an idea, hundreds, thousands or maybe even millions of people have probably had the same idea before. Most have just never bothered to implement it, or at least haven’t succeeded at it.

“Every innovator will face plenty of challenges on the way, and there will be plenty of times when things look dire, and you could give up.”

Every innovator will face plenty of challenges on the way, and there will be plenty of times when things look dire, and you could give up. Most do. But to succeed, you need to persevere and persist through these hardships.

To do that, you’re going to need a lot of discipline to avoid potential distractions, keep your head down and focus on what matter.

Trust the process and keep going

If you’ve ever been following a challenging fitness program, you know the feeling when it looks like you’re working your butt off and not making any progress.

The weights feel even heavier than they did the last time. That’s because you’ve been accumulating stress on your body, and it hasn’t yet had the opportunity to respond. Once you get some rest and recover from that stress caused by the exercise, the body will react to the stress and make you stronger.

Innovation takes hard work and trust in the process

Well, the journey is the same with innovation: facing those stressors will feel challenging, but if you don’t give up, that’s what will make both you and the innovation better.

To keep using the same metaphor, if you’d like to run a 3-hour marathon, your fitness program will obviously look very different from if you instead wanted to squat 500 pounds. Similarly, if your strategy calls for incremental innovation, your innovation processes will look very different from those aiming for disruptive innovation, but more on that here.

Regardless, the key in each of these situations is to just trust the process and keep going. Even when things don’t look great. The challenges you face will shape your innovation for the better, and the results will follow – or you’ll run out of money. Regardless, you just need the discipline to persist and stay on track.

While following the process is what will eventually get you there, you of course need to make sure you’re on the right path in the first place, and that is where disciplined thinking comes into play.

It’s easy to fool yourself without disciplined thinking

Our brain has a natural tendency to take mental shortcuts. We have an ability to recognize patterns and use those to make quick decisions efficiently and thus save energy. In most everyday situations, that ability is obviously very beneficial.

However, with innovation, this is often problematic. It’s these mental shortcuts that lead to many of the root causes behind issues that prevent organizations from innovating. This is perhaps easiest captured in common sayings like “This is how we’ve always done it” and “There’s no way that could work”.

“Our brain has a natural tendency to take mental shortcuts, which is the root cause behind many obstacles for innovation. Disciplined thinking is how you combat that.”

What’s more, if you’re an optimistic person, as most people working on innovation usually are, it’s easy to fool yourself to think that you have created something valuable even when you really haven’t. We often prematurely fall in love with that solution, instead of the problem.

Remaining highly analytical and rational in your decision-making while still being creative and aspirational is a tough combination for any person, or even for a team, to have.

Achieving that balance takes a lot of disciplined thinking. You need to stay grounded in reality, be willing to question yourself, and go back to first principleswhile still relentlessly moving forward. It’s a mindset anyone can learn, but that requires constant discipline to maintain.

Most organizations lack discipline

However, even if you are a good innovator, and have a great team that ticks all the boxes we’ve talked about above, it doesn’t mean that you’re automatically going to succeed.

One of the big barriers for that is the lack of organizational discipline. This is common for both startups and large organizations alike.

The idea is simple to understand. Just like an individual must remain focused to become great at something, so does an organization.

You need to make tough choices to have a clear strategy. That means saying no to a lot of things, so that you can focus on the things that will truly make a difference.

Clear focus and disciplined execution are necessary for innovation

Sometimes you might have to keep investing in these truly strategically important areas, even if there’s no quantifiable ROI in the near term. Again, at the same time, the organization needs the discipline to not think about sunk costs and ruthlessly kill innovation projects that have proven to not be able to live up to their potential to free up resources for the ones that have the best odds of success.

That might sound like a paradoxical combination, and to a certain extent, it is. But that’s what makes it interesting.

On the execution side, you need a lot of discipline to have clear roles and set clear goals so that people have the prerequisites for succeeding, but also leave innovators with enough freedom to explore the best way to reach those goals. Again, that is a difficult combination to achieve. It requires a lot of discipline at all levels of the organization.

In our experience, most organizations just aren’t there yet, even if many individuals within the organization would be, and that is a big barrier for innovation.

As a result, corporate innovators often end up burning out or losing their motivation just trying to navigate the maze of organizational hierarchy for one permission and approval after another before they even get to start working on an innovation. That is a clear sign of an organization that isn’t disciplined – or alternatively has chosen to not innovate.

Discipline in practice

We’ve covered a lot of ground, and most of that has been pretty abstract, so before we wrap up, I’ll share a more practical example with you.

It’s a cliché to use Steve Jobs and Apple as an example for innovation, so I don’t usually like to do that. However, for this specific topic, I think it’s the perfect illustration because people usually see Jobs as this creative visionary and the ultimate ideas guy who couldn’t care less about processes or discipline.

But in fact, the first thing he did when coming back to Apple in 1997 wasn’t to come up with cool new products. It was to introduce a ton of discipline in everything they did and ruthlessly cut back on anything that didn’t truly help them innovate and create better products going forward.

First, he cut 70% of the products the company offered, and as a result, had to lay off 3,000 employees.

Apple's innovations came from following a disciplined process

Jim Collins does a great job summarizing some of the other actions in his book Great by Choice:

“They cut perks, stopped funding the corporate sabbatical program, improved operating efficiency, lowered overall cost structure, and got people focused on the intense ‘work all day and all of the night’ ethos that’d characterized Apple in its early years. Overhead costs fell. The cash-to-current-liabilities doubled, and then tripled.”

That provided Apple with the financial stability needed to invest in innovation and allowed them to focus their leadership and top talent purely on creating new innovations that ended up shaping the future of the company.

Also, from the Walter Isaacson biography of Jobs (which I highly recommend), it becomes obvious how diligent and disciplined Jobs and the rest of the team at Apple were in perfecting every little detail of their products, processes, and even the look of their stores (sometimes to a fault).

Conclusion

To conclude, it takes a lot of discipline to succeed at innovation. That discipline is at least as important as the creativity we usually associate with the term innovation. And, because it’s so underrated, I’d argue it’s the part most of us need to focus on.

After all, it is that disciplined execution of an idea that usually makes the difference between those that succeed and fail.

Thomas Edison did a great job in summarizing discipline when asked about his failed attempts at a lightbulb:

“I have not failed. I have successfully found 10,000 ways that will not work.”

Discipline is, without a doubt, about putting in the work, but there’s a bit more to it than that. It’s also about staying focused and grounded in reality, both of which are well displayed in that quote.

“Being disciplined, both as an individual as well as an organization can be very challenging. The good thing is that it is a muscle that you can develop.”

Even if it might not be immediately obvious, lack of discipline either as an individual or as an organization, is the root cause behind a significant portion of challenges organizations face when trying to innovate.

To be frank, being disciplined, both as an individual as well as an organization, for extended periods of time can be very challenging. The good thing is that it is, figuratively speaking, a muscle that you can develop. Most would-be innovators and leaders just aren’t quite there yet.

If you recognize yourself or your organization from this article, there’s no need to hide that – and there’s nothing to be ashamed of. We’ve all been there. Each of us has areas in our life where we lack discipline, or at the very least, times when we’ve failed to keep that up.

In fact, as an individual or organization, you need to be honest and admit that this is a problem for you. Once you do, you can take steps to address that, and you’ll be much closer to becoming a successful innovator.

This article was originally published in Viima’s blog.

Image credits: Unsplash, Viima

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Transformational Leadership

Leave a reply

Inspiring Change from the Top

Transformational Leadership

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s rapidly changing world, organizations must adapt to new challenges and opportunities to remain competitive. Transformational leadership is a powerful approach that enables organizations to inspire change from the top. This leadership style focuses on inspiring and motivating employees, encouraging innovation, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Let’s delve into the essence of transformational leadership and how it can drive success, illuminated by two compelling case studies.

The Essence of Transformational Leadership

Transformational leadership is characterized by the ability to inspire and motivate followers to exceed their own self-interests for the sake of the organization. A transformational leader is visionary, charismatic, and empowers team members to unleash their full potential. The four components that define transformational leadership are:

Idealized Influence: Acting as a role model that followers admire and trust.
Inspirational Motivation: Inspiring employees with enthusiasm and a shared vision.
Intellectual Stimulation: Encouraging innovation and creativity by challenging beliefs and assumptions.
Individualized Consideration: Providing personalized coaching and mentorship to address individual needs.

Case Study 1: Satya Nadella at Microsoft

Revitalizing a Tech Giant

When Satya Nadella took the helm as CEO of Microsoft in 2014, the company was facing challenges with stagnant growth and a rigid organizational culture. Nadella embraced transformational leadership, prioritizing a growth mindset and collaboration across divisions. He shifted the company towards cloud computing and artificial intelligence, driving cultural and strategic transformation.

Nadella’s leadership style emphasized empathy, innovation, and learning. He encouraged employees to take risks, learn from failures, and strive for continuous improvement. Under his leadership, Microsoft experienced a remarkable turnaround, becoming a trillion-dollar company and a leader in cloud technology, with a renewed focus on products that empower individuals and organizations.

Case Study 2: Indra Nooyi at PepsiCo

Transforming with Purpose

Indra Nooyi’s tenure as CEO of PepsiCo from 2006 to 2018 serves as another exemplary instance of transformational leadership. Facing a market demanding more health-conscious products, Nooyi embarked on a strategy dubbed “Performance with Purpose.”

She drove the company’s focus towards sustainability and health by reshaping the product portfolio to include healthier options, reducing environmental impact, and enhancing resource efficiencies. Nooyi’s visionary approach and capacity to inspire her teams helped PepsiCo adapt to evolving consumer preferences while continuing to grow its core business. This transformational vision solidified PepsiCo’s position as a leader in the global food and beverage industry.

The Path Forward

Through the lens of these case studies, we see transformational leadership as a catalyst for change. It showcases how leaders with a strategic vision can not only adapt to the changing world but also inspire others to join them on the journey of innovation and progress. Leaders who embrace this style cultivate a work environment where creativity flourishes, individuals are uplifted, and collective goals are achieved.

As organizations continue to face unprecedented challenges, transformational leaders will play a pivotal role in steering them towards a resilient and prosperous future. Are you ready to become a transformational leader?

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Is Scrum or Kanban Right for Your Team?

Leave a reply

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the fast-paced world of software development and project management, two agile methodologies stand out: Scrum and Kanban. While both aim to improve efficiency and productivity, they each have unique attributes that make them suitable for different types of teams and projects. Understanding these differences is crucial in making an informed decision about which methodology to implement for your team.

Understanding Scrum

Scrum is a structured framework for managing complex projects. It divides work into set periods known as sprints, typically lasting 2-4 weeks. The hallmark of Scrum is its focus on regular, iterative progress and transparency. Key roles include the Scrum Master, who facilitates the process, and the Product Owner, who prioritizes the backlog of work items.

Key Features of Scrum

Time-boxed sprints
Daily stand-up meetings
Defined roles and responsibilities
Regular reviews and retrospectives

Understanding Kanban

Kanban, on the other hand, is a visual method for managing workflow. It doesn’t prescribe fixed iterations or roles but relies on a board (physical or digital) to visualize tasks as they move through different stages of completion. Kanban aims to optimize the flow and limit work in progress (WIP).

Key Features of Kanban

Visual workflow management
Continuous delivery
WIP limits
Flexibility and adaptability

Case Study 1: XYZ Software Development

The Challenge

XYZ Software Development was struggling with long development cycles, leading to delayed product launches and stakeholder dissatisfaction. The company needed a structured approach to manage their complex projects more efficiently.

The Solution: Scrum

Adopting Scrum allowed XYZ to break their projects into manageable sprints. The introduction of clear roles and regular stand-ups fostered better communication and accountability. After implementing Scrum, XYZ saw a 30% reduction in development time and an increase in stakeholder satisfaction.

Case Study 2: Alpha Marketing Agency

The Challenge

Alpha Marketing Agency faced difficulties in adapting to sudden project changes and managing a high volume of small tasks. Their team needed a flexible method to handle continuously incoming work without predefined time constraints.

The Solution: Kanban

Switching to Kanban enabled Alpha to visualize their workflow. The flexible approach allowed them to quickly adapt to changes and effectively manage small, incoming tasks. By implementing Kanban, Alpha improved their task completion rate by 25% and achieved greater flexibility in their operations.

Conclusion

Choosing between Scrum and Kanban largely depends on your team’s specific needs and the nature of your projects. If your team thrives on structure, clear roles, and regular iterations, Scrum may be the better choice. However, if your team needs flexibility and the ability to adapt on the fly, Kanban could be the way to go. By understanding the strengths and applications of each methodology, you can make an informed decision that will drive your team toward greater efficiency and success.

Remember, the goal of both methodologies is to improve productivity and facilitate better project management, so it may also be worth considering a hybrid approach that leverages the strengths of both Scrum and Kanban.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.