Tag Archives: Patagonia

Is Now the Time to Finally End Our Culture of Disposability?

Is Now the Time to Finally End Our Culture of Disposability?Quality used to mean something to companies.

A century ago, when people parted with their hard-earned money to buy something, they expected it to last one or more lifetimes.

Durability was a key design criteria.

But, as the stock market became more central to the American psyche and to executive compensation, the quality of available products and services began to decline in the name of profits above all else.

.

Ford Quality is job oneThere was a temporary consumer revolt decades ago that resulted in companies pretending that quality was more important than profits, but it didn’t last long. In the end, Americans accepted the decline in quality as outsourcing and globalization led to declining prices (and of course higher profits) and fewer goods carrying the “Made in the USA” label, quickly replaced by Japan, China, Mexico, Vietnam, Bangladesh and the rest.

An Inconvenient TruthAround the turn of the century we had the birth of the Cradle-to-Cradle (C2C) movement followed a few years later by Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. Perhaps people were beginning to wake up to the fact that our planet’s resources are not infinite and our culture of disposability was catching up to us.

But these movements failed to maintain their momentum and the tidal wave of stores stocking disposable goods continued unabated – dollar stores and party stores spread across the country like a virus. States like New York began shipping their garbage across borders as their landfills reached capacity. Unsold goods began being dumped on the African continent and elsewhere (think about all those t-shirts printed up for the team that didn’t end up winning the Super Bowl).

Is now the time for the winds to shift yet again in favor of quality and sustainability after decades of disposability?

Will more companies better embrace sustainability like Patagonia is attempting to do?

People have been complaining for years about the high cost to repair Apple products and the increasing difficulty of executing these repairs oneself. Recently Apple was FORCED by shareholder activists to allow people to repair their iPhones. Here is their press release that tries to put a positive spin on what they were pressured into doing.

This is the moment for shareholder activists and governments around the world to force companies to design for repairability, reuse and a true accounting of the costs of their products and services inflict upon the populace and the planet. The European Union and Mexico are working together towards this not just because the planet needs this, but because The Circular Economy Creates New Business Opportunities.

Meanwhile, Toyota recently announced that starting this year (2022) in Japan that they will retrofit late-model cars with new technology if the customer desires it. The company aims to let motorists benefit from new technology without having to buy a new car. The LoraxToyota calls this “uppgrading” and defines it as retrofitting safety and convenience functions, like blind spot monitoring, emergency braking assist, rear cross-traffic alert, and the addition of a hands-free tailgate or trunk lid. Remodeling will also be an option and will include replacing worn or damaged parts inside and out, such as the upholstery, the seat cushions, and the steering wheel.

Are these two companies voluntary and involuntary actions the beginning of a trend – finally?

Or will the culture of disposability continue unabated until our natural resources are exhausted?

Do we truly live in the land of the Lorax?

Image credits: Wikimedia Commons, OldHouseOnline

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Change Leadership and Building Resilience in Organizations

Change Leadership and Building Resilience in Organizations

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s rapidly changing business landscape, organizations need strong leadership and resilience to thrive. Change is inevitable, and effective change management requires leaders who can guide their teams through transitions and build resilience within the organization. This article explores the concept of change leadership and its impact on building resilience, using two case studies to illustrate successful strategies.

Case Study 1 – IBM

IBM, a global technology giant, faced a significant challenge in the early 1990s when it realized that its traditional mainframe business was becoming obsolete. The company recognized the need to shift its focus towards emerging technologies such as cloud computing and artificial intelligence. To lead this transformation, IBM appointed Gerstner as its CEO in 1993.

Gerstner implemented a change leadership approach that involved creating a sense of urgency, establishing a clear vision, and involving employees at all levels. He recognized the importance of building resilience in the organization by aligning the company’s culture with its new strategic direction. Through transparency and open communication, Gerstner instilled trust in his employees and motivated them to embrace the changes.

IBM’s transformation was successful, and the company not only survived but thrived in the technology industry. This case study demonstrates the critical role of change leadership in driving organizational resilience during periods of significant change.

Case Study 2 – Patagonia

Patagonia is an outdoor apparel company known for its commitment to sustainability and social responsibility. In 2011, the company faced a supply chain crisis when environmental organizations exposed the use of harmful chemicals in its products. This revelation threatened Patagonia’s reputation and market position as an eco-friendly brand.

In response, the company’s founder and CEO, Yvon Chouinard, took a proactive approach to address the issue. Chouinard implemented a change leadership strategy that involved owning up to the problem, conducting thorough research on alternative materials and manufacturing methods, and engaging with stakeholders to rebuild trust.

The change leadership approach also emphasized building resilience by fostering a learning culture and empowering employees to adopt innovative practices. Patagonia introduced its “Worn Wear” program that encouraged customers to repair, reuse, and recycle their garments, aligning with its sustainability values.

Patagonia’s commitment to change and resilience paid off. With its transparent approach and focus on sustainability, the company regained customer trust and attracted new environmentally conscious consumers. The case study demonstrates how change leadership and resilience can not only mitigate a crisis but also be a driver for long-term success.

Conclusion

Change leadership is essential for building resilience in organizations. The case studies of IBM and Patagonia demonstrate that effective change leaders create a vision, engage employees, and foster a culture that embraces and adapts to change. By proactively addressing challenges and building resilience within their organizations, both companies achieved significant success.

Leadership that guides organizations through change and builds resilience enables businesses to adapt to evolving market conditions, seize new opportunities, and navigate crises. In an era of constant change, organizations that prioritize change leadership and resilience are more likely to remain competitive and thrive.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.