Category Archives: culture

Cultural Shifts Required for Agile Success

Cultural Shifts Required for Agile Success

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In an era of rapid technological evolution and market dynamism, Agile has emerged as the go-to methodology for organizations seeking agility and resilience. However, the successful adoption of Agile is not just about implementing new processes or tools. At its core, Agile requires profound cultural shifts—a transformation in how individuals and teams think, interact, and operate.

The Imperative of Cultural Change

Agile methodologies promise speed, flexibility, and customer-centric approaches. However, many organizations fail to reap these benefits, primarily because they overlook the critical role of culture. For Agile to truly take root and flourish, organizations must embrace several key cultural shifts:

  • From Control to Empowerment: Agile thrives in environments where teams are empowered to make decisions. This requires a shift away from command-and-control management styles.
  • From Silos to Collaboration: Cross-functional collaboration is vital. Agile demands breaking down silos and fostering open communication and teamwork.
  • From Planning to Experimentation: Agile values iterative learning and adaptation over rigid planning.
  • From Risk Avoidance to Embracing Failure: Creating a culture where failure is seen as a learning opportunity is crucial for innovation.

Case Study 1: Spotify

Spotify’s success with Agile practices is well-documented and provides a compelling case study of cultural transformation. At Spotify, the organization is designed around cross-functional “squads,” each with end-to-end responsibility for their portions of the product. Here’s how Spotify navigated the cultural shifts:

  • Empowerment: Squads at Spotify are autonomous, empowering team members to experiment and make decisions without needing constant approval from higher management.
  • Collaboration: Cross-functional nature of squads ensures deep collaboration across disciplines, promoting knowledge sharing and holistic problem-solving.
  • Experimentation: Spotify encourages a “fail-friendly” culture where trying new ideas is embraced, and projects can pivot or stop based on what they learn quickly.

As a result, Spotify maintains a high capacity for innovation and adaptability, relevant to their fast-moving digital landscape.

Case Study 2: General Electric (GE)

General Electric, a company known for its traditional bureaucratic structure, embarked on an Agile transformation journey in its software development division to keep pace with technological changes and market demands.

  • From Control to Empowerment: GE overhauled their managerial approaches by adopting Lean Startup principles, which gave teams more autonomy to develop innovative solutions quickly.
  • Silos to Collaboration: GE’s Agile journey involved creating collocated, cross-functional teams tasked with tackling specific customer challenges, breaking down traditional silos.
  • Embracing Failure: Teams were encouraged to experiment and iterate, fostering a culture of learning from failure without the fear of repercussions.

While challenges existed, this cultural shift allowed GE to accelerate innovation and better respond to customer needs in their software products.

Navigating the Transition

Transitioning to an Agile culture is not without its challenges. Resistance to change, entrenched habits, and existing power dynamics can hinder progress. Here are strategies to navigate these challenges:

  • Leadership Buy-In: Securing support from leadership is crucial. Leaders must model Agile behaviors and champion cultural changes.
  • Change Agents: Identify and empower change agents who can advocate for and facilitate cultural shifts within teams.
  • Continuous Learning: Promote a culture of ongoing education and training to equip staff with the skills and mindset needed for Agile success.
  • Feedback Loops: Create mechanisms for regular feedback and reflection, allowing teams to learn and adapt continually.

Conclusion

Agile is not just a process but a mindset—a culture. The organizations that successfully navigate the transition to Agile do so by fundamentally reshaping their organizational culture. As seen in the examples of Spotify and GE, the journey to Agile success is challenging but ultimately rewarding, leading to more innovative, responsive, and resilient organizations.

To truly thrive in today’s fast-paced world, organizations must embrace the cultural shifts that Agile demands, fostering environments where empowerment, collaboration, experimentation, and learning from failure are not just encouraged, but ingrained into the very fabric of daily operations.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Managing Cross-Cultural Remote Teams

Closing the Virtual and Cultural Gap

Managing Cross-Cultural Remote Teams

GUEST POST from Douglas Ferguson

Learning to connect a culturally diverse virtual workforce is an essential part of managing cross cultural remote teams. Faced with the challenge of virtual team building, remote team managers also have to unite their virtual teams across any cultural differences, time zones, and other unique elements.

Recent studies show that 62% of virtual teams are comprised of workers from three or more cultures. Surprisingly, only 15% of team leaders have successfully led cross cultural remote teams. Such statistics show the dire need for improving cross cultural remote teams management.

In the following article, we’ll discuss managing cross cultural remote teams as we cover topics such as:

  • What Are Cross Cultural Remote Teams?
  • The Challenges of Cross Culture Remote Work
  • Closing the Virtual Gap for Culturally Diverse Teams
  • Essential Skills for Managing Cross Cultural Remote Teams
  • Improving Cross Cultural Leadership Skills

What Are Cross Cultural Remote Teams?

With the rise of remote work, it comes as no surprise that cross culture remote teams are the reality of today’s working world. Cross culture remote teams are teams made up of the global talent pool. Whether a company pulls freelancers from various parts of the world or hires remote team members within the same country, effectively working together requires a strategic approach to managing such a diverse group of workers.

Remote work experts suggest that culture is defined as the social expectations, customs, and achievements unique to a nation or region. One’s idea of culture frames the way they approach work, life events, and communication. While distributed teams composed of members from various cultures are an effective way to diversify the workforce, the difference in cultures and time zones can lead to collaborative and communication challenges.

The Challenges of Cross Culture Remote Work

Managing cross cultural remote teams come with unique benefits and challenges. Being able to fill your team with the world’s greatest minds is an incredibly powerful way to shore up your company’s talent pool. However, each team member will have their practices, preferences, and ideas of company culture, and as a result, may have trouble gelling with the rest of the team.

Moreover, team managers will experience the challenges of building a team in the virtual world. Without the face-to-face interaction of a shared workplace, cross-culture remote teams are more vulnerable to conflict and communication problems.

Remote team leaders face unique challenges such as:

1. Work Style

When managing cross cultural remote teams, be sure to address the individual work style of your team members. When working with team members from different cultures, it’s essential to acknowledge each person’s work style. This is especially true for team members that are of vastly different cultures. For example, certain work cultures prioritize individual opinions while others expect to follow a leader’s course of action.

2. Information Gaps

In the virtual world, information gaps are a huge threat when managing cross cultural remote teams. Any information gaps can negatively affect processes and data flows. All team members need access to the most appropriate resources to successfully collaborate.

3. Motivation Factors

Team leaders should do their best to analyze how each person’s culture may affect their motivations to better manage their team. Motivation factors for cross culture remote teams are vastly different than that of a traditional company. For example, while some team members may be motivated by a range of tangible benefits like bonuses, others focus on intangible benefits like encouragement and job satisfaction.

4. Influences

When managing cross cultural remote teams. Managers face the challenges of certain factions attempting to influence the rest of the group. If part of the team has the same cultural identity, they may use that to dominate a conversation or outcome, leading to conflict and contentious work environments.

Closing the Virtual Gap for Culturally Diverse Teams

Navigating virtual cross-cultural teams starts with first addressing virtual team building. While your team’s cultural background may play a role in the unique challenges you face, everything comes back to your ability to work together as a team. Level the playing field with an effective strategy to close the gaps and facilitate stronger personal relationships among team members.

By making an effort to strengthen connections between your team members, you’ll be able to bridge initial gaps created by remote work. Moreover, team members that share a common bond will be able to better navigate any cross-cultural challenges that may arise. Consider using intentionally designed games and activities like icebreakers to help strengthen connections between team members.

Essential Skills for Managing Cross Cultural Remote Teams

In the virtual world, company culture is constantly changing. To effectively run a diverse group of remote workers, team leaders must be open to learning the most appropriate skills to bring the best out of their team.

Lead your remote team to success by honing skills such as:

1. Adaptability

Cross cultural management hinges upon the leader’s ability to understand each team member’s work style and make the necessary adjustments. While you shouldn’t completely abandon your leadership style, you will need to integrate other behaviors, worldviews, commonalities, and perspectives to find more relatable ways to manage your team.

2. Self-Awareness

Self-awareness is a key skill for leaders of cross-culture teams. Conflicts can arise quickly in a virtual workspace, so it’s important for you to regularly monitor and manage your own biases as you exercise patience and grace in your communications. Make an effort to frequently challenge your perspective and take a step back in your interactions with team members. This will help you navigate complex cultural challenges as you take note of where your perspective and behavior may require adjustment.

3. Articulation

When working with a virtual team from different cultural backgrounds, clear communication is essential. By prioritizing articulation and careful and deliberate conversation, team leaders will be better able to ensure that every member of their team understands what they’re saying. Similarly, if other team members tend to speak too quickly, don’t hesitate to ask them to repeat themselves or speak at a slower pace.

4. Writing Proficiency

In virtual meetings, calls, or voice notes, words can easily get lost in translation. Team leaders should develop the habit of communicating in writing to make sure all their team members have access to a document they can refer to at a later point in time.

Improving Cross-Cultural Leadership Skills

Remote work opens a world of possibilities in the way of team leadership. As your team expands to include a more culturally-diverse group, your leadership skills should improve as well. At Voltage Control, we offer facilitation courses, remote collaboration resources, and team-building workshops to help you navigate the pitfalls of managing remote teams and connecting culturally diverse groups.

Work with our team of expert facilitators to learn more about managing cross cultural remote teams. With the help of workshops and resources, you’ll learn to expertly lead a virtual session, unite a distributed team, and appreciate and highlight the cultural differences that make your team a well-oiled virtual machine. Contact us to learn more about our custom programs for leadership development, master facilitation certification, and change management.

Article originally posted at VoltageControl.com

Image Credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Lost Tribe of Medicine

The Lost Tribe of Medicine

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers, M.D.

I can remember opening my medical school acceptance letter. I was, of course, excited to go down a lifelong career pathway, but also, felt joy at knowing that I was accepted into a tribe of international doctors that would welcome me anywhere in the world, who spoke a common language and had a common culture and ethos. A sense of community and belonging is important to mental health.

Research has shown that when employees feel that they belong to a team or organization, they will not only tend to perform better, but also experience higher levels of engagement and well-being. But our feeling of belonging at work has become challenged over the past year as we’ve shifted away from in-person interactions and found ourselves relying on video calls and screen activities to stay connected.

Here is the painting I passed under on my way to class for the first two years at Jefferson Medical College (The Surgical Clinic of Professor Gross/ Thomas Eakins):

Jefferson Medical College

Here is a painting I passed in the halls at the University of Pennsylvania (The Agnew Clinic/ Thomas Eakins):

University of Pennsylvania

Here is the painting of William Osler I passed in the halls of Philadelphia General Hospital:

Philadelphia General Hospital

Here is portrait of Florence Sabin where I work now.

Florence Sabin

One of the preeminent medical and scientific minds of the early twentieth century, Dr. Florence Rena Sabin (1871–1953) was a public servant devoted to improving public health. As the first woman to receive a full professorship at Johns Hopkins University, Sabin was also a successful woman in the medical field at a time when the profession was still dominated by men. In addition to helping Colorado’s fight against polio and tuberculosis, Sabin championed legislation that created the State Health Department in 1947 and successfully lobbied for a variety of other public health improvements. She is regarded as one of the best scientists Colorado has ever produced, and her legacy is honored with a statue in the nation’s capital.

Patrick Hanlon, is his book “Primal Branding”, defines a brand as something people feel something about. He goes on to state that believing is belonging. When you are able to create brands, like the medical profession, that people believe in , you also create groups of people who feel that they belong.

Primal branding is about delivering the primal code. Unlike the four elements of the code in DNA, though, there are seven: the creation story, the creed, the icons, the rituals, pagans, the sacred words and the leader.

Researchers have lumped tribes into 5 stages:

The reality is something else. Unfortunately, in many ways, the medical tribe has become fractious and unaccepting. The results are burnout, depression, suicide, disenchantment and fragmentation of power.

Examples include:

1. Medical education and training that some have described as abusive
2. Turf wars
3. Jealousy, greed and resentment for those who want to upset the apple cart, potentially threatening the cash cow and status quo
4. Marginalizing disruptive doctors
5. Subconscious or implicit bias against colleagues based on race, gender or other factors.
6. Hostility between MD and non-MD “providers”
7. Pushback against scope of practice creep
8. Specialists v generalists
9. Grunts v physician executives and administrators
10. Conflicts in interprofessional relations and care teams.
11. Racism. Is your doctor a racist?
12. Gender pay gaps

Here are 10 reasons why doctors don’t play nice with others.

Plus, all doctors have multiple affiliations and are more engaged with some than others. For example, they have varying levels of engagement with their employer, their specialty association or their local, regional or national medical association. Most tend to go where they are treated best and drop or ignore the others. Mentors,sponsors,coaches and colleagues help with burnout.

Many of us recall with fondness, particularly those who have served in the military, those times we shared with “foxhole buddies” e.g residency training, project teams, shock and trauma units and circumstances, like following mass killings or natural disasters, when the community comes to together. Even the doctor’s lounge is a thing of the past because the real estate is “too valuable” and doughnuts and coffee costs too much.

In many places, doctors have lost their sense of community and attachment to the tribe. The dark underbelly of medicine has damaged the brand.

When was the last time you visited the Museum of Physician Happiness?

Some solutions are:

1. Physician leadership academies that emphasize monitored experiential learning throughout medical school and residency
2. Reform the toxic culture of medical education and residency
3. Hold department chairs and deans accountable
4. Empower physicians to regain control of their destiny
5. Save private practice
6. Regulate overreach of private equity and corporate consolidation
7. Physician innovation and entrepreneurship fellowships
8. Kill most MD/MBA programs
9. Demand interprofessional cooperation or coopetition
10. Teach doctors how to rebuild the medical brand

We should also show more appreciation for each other.

Doctors have lost their sense of belonging. They don’t need a therapist. They need an anthropologist.

Image Credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Strategies for Boosting Employee Engagement

Strategies for Boosting Employee Engagement

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, employee engagement is more critical than ever. Engaged employees are not just happier, but they are also more productive, more innovative, and more loyal. Yet, fostering genuine engagement is a challenge that requires deliberate strategies and effort.

Understanding Employee Engagement

Employee engagement is not merely about job satisfaction. It’s about creating an emotional commitment to the organization and its goals. Engaged employees understand their role in the bigger picture, feel valued, and are inspired to contribute to organizational success.

Key Strategies for Boosting Engagement

Below are actionable strategies designed to bolster employee engagement within organizations:

  • Foster Open Communication: Encourage a culture of transparency where employees feel safe to express ideas and concerns. Regularly update teams on company goals and achievements.
  • Offer Professional Growth Opportunities: Invest in training, mentorship, and development programs. A clear path for advancement engages employees and reduces turnover.
  • Recognize and Reward Contributions: Create a recognition program to celebrate achievements and show appreciation. Tailor rewards to individual preferences wherever possible.
  • Cultivate a Positive Work Environment: Ensure a healthy work-life balance, create comfortable workspaces, and promote a supportive and inclusive culture.
  • Empower Employees: Encourage autonomy and resourcefulness by giving employees ownership of their projects and trusting their judgement.

Case Study 1: Tech Innovators Inc.

At Tech Innovators Inc., a software development company, employee engagement was at an all-time low. High turnover and plummeting morale prompted leadership to take action.

Strategy Implementation:

  • Open Communication: Introduced bi-weekly town hall meetings and an anonymous digital suggestion box.
  • Growth Opportunities: Launched a comprehensive skills-building program and clear career progression plans.

Results: Within six months, the company saw a 30% increase in employee satisfaction scores and a significant reduction in turnover. Employees felt heard and valued, driving a surge in innovative project proposals.

Case Study 2: Green Horizon Solutions

Green Horizon Solutions, an environmental consulting firm, struggled with engagement as employees felt their efforts went unnoticed.

Strategy Implementation:

  • Recognition and Rewards: Developed a ‘Horizon Heroes’ monthly recognition program, where peer-nominated employees receive awards.
  • Positive Work Environment: Improved workspaces with ergonomic furniture and introduced wellness sessions, including yoga and mindfulness practices.

Results: The firm achieved an impressive 40% improvement in employee engagement metrics. The newfound positive atmosphere led to increased collaboration and creative solutions, driving business success.

Conclusion

Boosting employee engagement is a multifaceted endeavor that requires commitment from leadership and strategic action. By implementing the aforementioned strategies and adapting them to your organization’s unique culture, you can initiate transformative change that benefits both employees and the organization at large. Remember, engagement is an ongoing journey, and maintaining it demands continuous and conscious effort.

With these strategies, businesses can cultivate an engaged, motivated workforce, ultimately fostering a thriving organizational environment.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Creating an Environment that Fosters Innovation

Creating an Environment that Fosters Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Innovation, at its core, isn’t a magical spark that ignites in isolation. It’s the byproduct of a carefully cultivated environment – a fertile ground where ideas can germinate, cross-pollinate, and ultimately flourish. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I’ve witnessed firsthand the transformative power of intentionally designing such ecosystems. It’s not just about brainstorming sessions or suggestion boxes; it’s about weaving innovation into the very fabric of an organization’s culture, processes, and physical spaces.

The journey to fostering innovation begins with understanding the human element. People are the wellspring of new ideas, and unlocking their creative potential requires more than just asking them to be innovative. It demands a shift in mindset, a dismantling of fear, and the creation of psychological safety where experimentation and even failure are seen as learning opportunities, not career-ending mistakes.

The Pillars of an Innovative Environment

Several key pillars underpin a truly innovative environment:

  • Psychological Safety: Individuals must feel comfortable taking risks, voicing unconventional ideas, and challenging the status quo without fear of retribution. This requires leaders who actively encourage diverse perspectives and create a culture of trust and respect.
  • Open Communication and Collaboration: Silos stifle innovation. Creating opportunities for cross-functional teams to interact, share knowledge, and build upon each other’s ideas is crucial. This can be facilitated through shared workspaces, collaborative technologies, and intentionally designed interactions.
  • A Growth Mindset: Embracing the belief that abilities and intelligence can be developed through dedication and hard work is fundamental. This mindset encourages continuous learning, adaptation, and resilience in the face of challenges – all essential ingredients for innovation.
  • Empowerment and Autonomy: Giving individuals a sense of ownership and control over their work fosters creativity and engagement. When people feel empowered to explore new approaches and make decisions, they are more likely to generate innovative solutions.
  • Tolerance for Experimentation and Failure: Innovation inherently involves risk. An environment that penalizes failure will quickly stifle experimentation. Instead, organizations should celebrate learning from mistakes and view failures as valuable data points that inform future endeavors.
  • Access to Diverse Perspectives: Innovation thrives on the collision of different viewpoints and experiences. Actively seeking out and valuing diverse backgrounds, skills, and ways of thinking can lead to more creative and robust solutions.
  • Resources and Support: Providing the necessary time, tools, and resources empowers individuals and teams to pursue innovative ideas. This includes dedicated innovation budgets, access to experts, and supportive leadership.

Case Study 1: Google’s “20% Time”

Google’s famous “20% Time” policy, while having evolved over the years, exemplifies the power of providing autonomy and resources for innovation. This policy allowed engineers to spend 20% of their workweek on projects of their own choosing. This seemingly unstructured time led to the development of groundbreaking products like Gmail, AdSense, and Google News.

The success of “20% Time” highlights several key elements of an innovation-fostering environment: autonomy in choosing projects, trust in employees’ intrinsic motivation, and the allocation of resources (time) to explore novel ideas. While the formal policy may have shifted, the underlying principle of empowering employees to pursue their passions remains a cornerstone of Google’s innovative culture.

Case Study 2: IDEO’s Human-Centered Design Approach

IDEO, a renowned design and innovation consultancy, has built its reputation on a deeply human-centered approach. Their process emphasizes empathy, understanding the needs and desires of users, and rapid prototyping and iteration. Their environment fosters innovation through cross-functional teams working in open, collaborative spaces, a strong culture of experimentation where “fail early, fail often” is embraced, and a relentless focus on understanding the user.

IDEO’s success in designing innovative products and services across various industries demonstrates the power of integrating human needs into the innovation process and creating an environment that supports rapid iteration and learning. Their physical spaces are often designed to encourage spontaneous interaction and the sharing of ideas, further reinforcing a culture of collaboration and innovation.

Cultivating a Continuous Cycle of Innovation

Creating an environment that fosters innovation is not a one-time project; it’s an ongoing journey. It requires continuous attention, adaptation, and a commitment from leadership to champion a culture where new ideas are valued, nurtured, and brought to life. By focusing on the human element, building the right pillars, and learning from successful examples, organizations can unlock their collective creative potential and thrive in an increasingly dynamic world.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Taking Personal Responsibility – Seeing Self as Cause

Taking Personal Responsibility – Seeing Self as Cause

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

In our last two blogs on Taking Personal Responsibility, we stated that when people aren’t taking personal responsibility, they cannot be accountable, they will fail in their jobs, and their teams, and fail to grow as individuals and as leaders. Taking personal responsibility is an especially crucial capability to develop self-awareness and self-regulation skills in the decade of both disruption and transformation. It all starts with seeing self as the cause of what happens to us, rather than baling it on the effects events and problems have on us! Where people can learn to recognize the structures at play in their lives and change them so that they can create what they really want to create in their lives, teams, or organizations.

In the last two blogs, we shared a range of tips for shifting people’s location, by creating a line of choice, to help them shift from being below the line and blaming others for their reactive response, to getting above the line quickly.  Through shifting their language from “you, they and them” to “I, we and us” and bravely disrupting and calling out people when they do slip below the line. How doing this allows people to also systemically shift across the maturity continuum, from dependence to independence and ultimately towards interdependence.

In a recent newsletter Otto Scharmer, from the Presencing Institute states “Between action and non-action there is a place. A portal into the unknown. But what are we each called to contribute to the vision of the emerging future? Perhaps these times are simply doorways into the heart of the storm, a necessary journey through the cycles of time required to create change”.

Creating the place – the sacred pause

When I made a significant career change from a design and marketing management consultant to becoming a corporate trainer, one of the core principles I was expected to teach to senior corporate managers and leaders was taking personal responsibility.

Little knowing, that at the end of the workshop, going back to my hotel room and beating myself up, for all of the “wrongs” in the delivery of the learning program, was totally out of integrity with this core principle.

Realising that when people say – those that teach need to learn, I had mistakenly thought that I had to take responsibility for enacting the small imperfections I had delivered during the day, by berating myself, making myself “wrong” and through below the line self-depreciation!

Where I perfectly acted out the harmful process of self-blame, rather than rationally assessing the impact of each small imperfection, shifting to being above the line where I could intentionally apply the sacred pause:

  • Hit my pause button to get present, accept my emotional state,
  • Connect with what really happened to unpack the reality of the situation and eliminate my distortions around it,
  • Check-in and acknowledge how I was truly feeling about what happened,
  • Acknowledge some of the many things that I had done really well,
  • Ask myself what is the outcome/result I want for participants next program?
  • Ask myself what can I really learn from this situation?
  • Consciously choose what to do differently the next time I ran the program.

I still often find myself struggling with creating the Sacred Space between Stimulus and Response and have noticed in my global coaching practice, that many of my well-intentioned clients struggle with this too.

The impact of the last two and a half years of working at home, alone, online, with minimal social interactions and contact, has caused many of them to languish in their reactivity, and for some of them, into drowning in a very full emotional boat, rather than riding the wave of disruptive change.

Being the creative cause

In our work at ImagineNation, whether we help people, leaders and teams adapt, innovate and grow through disruption, their ability to develop true self-awareness and be above the line is often the most valuable and fundamental skill set they develop.

It then enables us to make the distinction that creating is completely different from reacting or responding to the circumstances people find themselves in by applying the sacred pause.

When people shift towards seeing self as the cause they are able to create and co-create what they want in their lives, teams or organization by learning to create by creating, starting with asking the question:

  • What result do you want to create in your life?
  • What is the reality of your current situation?

This creates a state of tension, it is this tension that seeks resolution.

In his ground-breaking book The Path of Least Resistance Robert Fritz, goes on to describe and rank these desired results as “Fundamental Choices, Primary Choices, and Secondary Choices.”

Because there is one thing that we can all do right and is totally in our control – is to shift towards seeing self as the cause and make a set of conscious choices, with open hearts, minds, and wills, as to how we think, feel and choose to act.

“We are the creative force of our life, and through our own decisions rather than our conditions, if we carefully learn to do certain things, we can accomplish those goals.”

We all have the options and choices in taking responsibility, empowering ourselves and others to be imaginative and creative, and using the range of rapid changes, ongoing disruption, uncertainty, and the adverse pandemic consequences, as levers for shifting and controlling, the way we think, feel.

Benefits of seeing self as the cause and being above the line

Applying the sacred pause to make change choices in how we act – and being brave and bold in shifting across the maturity continuum, will help us to cultivate the creativity, interdependence, and systemic thinking we all need right now because it:

  • Helps people self-regulate their reactive emotional responses, be more open-hearted and emotionally agile, and helps develop psychologically safe work environments where people can collaborate and experiment, and fail without the fear of retribution or punishment.
  • Enables people to be more open-minded, imaginative, and curious and creates a safe space for continuous learning, maximizing diversity and inclusion, and proactive intentional change and transformation.
  • Promotes ownership of a problem or challenging situation and helps develop constructive and creative responses to problems and an ability to take intelligent actions.
  • Gives people an opportunity to impact positively on others and build empowered trusted and collaborative relationships.
  • Enables entrepreneurs and innovators to invent creative solutions and drive successful innovative outcomes.
  • Building the foundations for accountability, where people focus their locus of control on what they promise to deliver, enables them to be intrinsically motivated, and take smart risks on negotiating outcomes that they can be counted on for delivering.

Tips for seeing self as the cause and operating above the line

Taking personal responsibility and seeing self as the cause involves:

  • Acknowledging that “I/we had a role or contributed in some way, to the fact that this has not worked out the way “I/we wanted.”
  • Clarifying the outcome or result in you want from a specific situation or a problem.
  • Seeking alternatives and options for making intelligent choices and actions, and using the language of “I/we can” and “I/we will” to achieve the outcome.
  • Replacing avoiding, being cynical and argumentative, blaming, shaming, controlling, and complaining with courageous, compassionate, and creative language and acts of intention.
  • People become victors who operate from “self as cause” where they are empowered to be the creative forces in their own lives by making fundamental, primary, and secondary change choices.
  • Trust your inner knowing and deep wisdom that everything has a specific and definable cause and that each and every one of us has the freedom to choose how to respond to it.

Back to leadership basics

As Stephen Covey says, people need to deeply and honestly say “I am what I am today because of the choices I made yesterday” because it’s not what happens to us, it’s our reactive response to what happens that hurts us.

Being willing to step back, retreat, and reflect on the gap between the results you want, and the results you are getting all starts with stepping inward, backward, and forwards, using the sacred pause, to ask:

  • What happened? What were the key driving forces behind it?
  • How am I/we truly feeling about it?
  • What was my/our role in causing this situation, or result?
  • What can I/we learn from it?
  • What is the result/outcome I want to create in the future?
  • What can I/we then do to create it?

As a corporate trainer, consultant and coach, I found out the hard way that developing the self-awareness and self-regulation skills in taking personal responsibility and seeing self as the cause is the basis of the personal power and freedom that is so important to me, and almost everyone else I am currently interacting with.

It’s the foundation for transcending paralysis, overwhelm, and stuck-ness and activating our sense of agency to transform society and ourselves.

This is the third and final blog in a series of blogs on the theme of taking responsibility – going back to leadership basics. Read the previous two here:

Find out about our learning products and tools, including The Coach for Innovators, Leaders, and Teams Certified Program, a collaborative, intimate, and deeply personalized innovation coaching and learning program, supported by a global group of peers over 9-weeks, starting Tuesday, October 18, 2022. It is a blended and transformational change and learning program that will give you a deep understanding of the language, principles, and applications of an ecosystem focus,  human-centric approach, and emergent structure (Theory U) to innovation, and upskill people and teams and develop their future fitness, within your unique context.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Taking Personal Responsibility – Creating the Line of Choice

Taking Personal Responsibility - Creating the Line of Choice

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

In our last blog, we described how people’s personal power is diminished when they don’t take personal responsibility for the impact of their behaviors and actions and the results they cause. Where many people are feeling minimized and marginalized, anxious as a result of being isolated and lonely, worrying about losing their security and freedom, and dealing with the instability in their working environments.  Resulting in many people disengaging from the important conversations, job functions, key relationships, workplaces, and in some instances, even from society. Where managers and leaders lack the basic self-awareness and self-regulation skills to control the only controllable in uncertain and unstable times, is to choose how to respond, rather than react to it.

We have a unique moment in time to shift their defensiveness through being compassionate, creative, and courageous towards helping managers and leaders unfreeze and mobilize to exit our comfort zones.  To take intelligent actions catalyze and cause positive outcomes, that deliver real solutions to crises, complex situations, and difficult business problems.

Why do people avoid taking personal responsibility?

People typically avoid taking personal responsibility for reasons ranging from simple laziness, risk adversity, or a fear of failure, to feeling change fatigued, overwhelmed, or even victimized by the scale of a problem or a situation.

Resulting in a range of different automatic defensive, and a range of non-productive reactive responses including:

  • Avoidant behavior, where feel victimized and targeted, people passively “wriggle” and the buck gets passed onto others, and the real problem or issue does not get addressed or resolved.
  • Controlling behavior, where people ignore their role in causing or resolving the real problem or issue, and aggressively push others towards their mandate or solution, denying others any agency.
  • Argumentative behavior, where people play the binary “right-wrong” game, and self-righteously, triggered by their own values, oppose other people’s perspectives in order to be right and make the other person wrong.

Creating the line of choice

At Corporate Vision, we added a thick line of “choice” between “personal responsibility” and “blame, justification and denial” to intentionally create space for people to consider taking more emotionally hygienic options rather than:

  • Dumping their “emotional boats” inappropriately onto others, even those they may deeply care about,
  • Sinking into their habitual, and largely unconscious default patterns when facing complex problems, which results in the delivery of the same results they always have.
  • Not regulating their automatic reactive responses to challenging situations, and not creating the vital space to pause and reflect to think about what to do next.

To enable them to shift towards taking response-ability (an ability to respond) and introducing more useful options for responding in emotionally agile, considered, constructive, inclusive, and creative ways to the problem or the challenge.

Noticing that when we, or others we interact with, do slip below the line to notice whether to “camp” there for the long term or to simply choose to make the “visit” a short one!

Doing this demonstrates the self-awareness and self-regulation skills enabling people to take personal responsibility. Which initiates ownership and a willingness to be proactive, solutions, and achievement orientated – all of which are essential qualities for 21st century conscious leadership that result in innovative outcomes that result in success, growth, and sustainability.

Shifting your location – from “you, they and them” to “I, we and us”

Developing the foundations for transformational and conscious leadership involves:

  • Supporting people to acknowledge and accept that the problem or challenge is not “out there” and is within their locus of control or influence.
  • Shifting the “Maturity Continuum” to enable leaders and managers to be both independent and interdependent.
  • Creating a line of choice to think, act and do things differently.
  • Calling out people when they slip below the line.

It involves supporting people to let go of their expectation that “they” or someone else, from the outside, will fix it, and supporting them to adopt a stance where:

  • “I” or “we” can and are empowered to do it,
  • “I” or “we” are responsible for getting above the line,
  • “I” or “we” can choose a different way of being, thinking, and acting intelligently in this situation.

Developing conscious leadership

At any time, everyone is either above or below the line because it is elemental to the type of conscious leadership we all need to survive and thrive, in a world where people are seeking leaders, managers, and working environments that require interdependence.

To operate in the paradigm of “we” – we can do it; we can cooperate; we can combine our talents and abilities and create something greater together.

We cooperate together by creating the line of choice where we call out to ourselves and others when we slip below it, to get above the line as quickly as possible.

Where interdependent people and communities combine their efforts, and their self-awareness and self-regulation skills with the efforts of others to achieve their growth and greatest success by increasing:

  • Transparency and trust,
  • Achievement and accountability,
  • Diversity and inclusion,
  • Experimentation and collaboration.

All of these are founded on the core principle of taking personal responsibility, which is an especially crucial capability to develop self-awareness and self-regulation skills in the decade of both disruption and transformation.

Bravely calling out self and others

When we take responsibility for managing our own, “below the line” reactive responses, by habitually creating the line of choice, we can bravely call out ourselves and others when we slip below it.

Because when we don’t call ourselves and others we interact with, we are unconsciously colluding with their emotional boats, default patterns, and automatic reactive responses, which inhibit their ability to effect positive change.

When we safely awaken ourselves and others, we can get back above the line quickly and choose different ways of being, thinking, and acting intelligently in the situation.

Alternately, people aren’t taking personal responsibility, they cannot be accountable, they will fail in their jobs, and their teams, and fail to grow as individuals and as leaders.

In fact, developing a habitual practice of emotionally intelligent and conscious leadership by safely and bravely disrupting ourselves and our people, in the face of ongoing uncertainty, accelerating change, and continuous disruption.

This is the second in a series of three blogs on the theme of taking responsibility – going back to leadership basics.

Find out about our learning products and tools, including The Coach for Innovators, Leaders, and Teams Certified Program, a collaborative, intimate, and deeply personalized innovation coaching and learning program, supported by a global group of peers over 9-weeks, starting Tuesday, October 18, 2022. It is a blended and transformational change and learning program that will give you a deep understanding of the language, principles, and applications of an ecosystem focus,  human-centric approach, and emergent structure (Theory U) to innovation, and upskill people and teams and develop their future fitness, within your unique context.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Cultural Change Goes Beyond Structures and Processes

Cultural Change Goes Beyond Structures and Processes

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the realm of organizational transformation, many leaders focus predominantly on altering structures and processes. While these elements are critical, true cultural change transcends mere mechanics. It permeates the essence of human interactions and the underlying beliefs within an organization. To achieve sustainable cultural change, one must delve deeper into the nuances of human-centered design and leadership.

The Essence of Cultural Change

Structural and procedural changes often provide the framework for transformation, but the real challenge lies in reshaping the mindset and behaviors of individuals. Culture is not just “the way we do things around here”; it is a dynamic entity influenced by shared values and the collective identity of an organization.

Human-centered change emphasizes empathy, active listening, and ongoing engagement. Leaders must recognize that individuals need to feel seen, heard, and valued to embrace change genuinely. Building trust and facilitating open dialogues are essential steps toward this holistic approach.

Case Study 1: Zappos – Delivering Happiness Through Culture

Zappos, the renowned online retailer, offers a compelling example of cultural transformation beyond structures and processes. When CEO Tony Hsieh took the helm, he prioritized company culture as a driver of success. His philosophy was simple yet profound: happy employees lead to happy customers.

To embed this cultural philosophy, Zappos introduced a “cultural fit” interview during its hiring process, ensuring alignment with its core values. Hsieh also championed transparency and open communication between all levels of staff, fostering a family-like atmosphere. The company’s unique culture became its competitive edge, exemplifying that when employees are empowered and valued, they become passionate and innovative contributors.

Case Study 2: The Transformation of Microsoft

Under Satya Nadella’s leadership, Microsoft underwent a remarkable cultural shift from a know-it-all culture to a learn-it-all culture. Recognizing that innovation stems from curiosity and learning, Nadella inspired a move away from rigid hierarchies toward a culture that fosters collaboration and continuous learning.

Microsoft’s “Growth Mindset” initiative emphasized the importance of embracing challenges and valuing feedback as a tool for personal and professional growth. By cultivating a more inclusive and open environment, Microsoft saw increased innovation and revitalized its employee engagement and satisfaction, driving its resurgence as a tech leader.

Moving Forward: Steps for Leaders

For leaders striving to enact human-centered cultural change, it is vital to lead with empathy and clarity. Begin by identifying and articulating the core values you wish to see flourish in your organization. Model these values consistently and reward behaviors that align with them.

Encourage cross-functional collaboration and create opportunities for employees to connect on a personal level. These interactions build the social fabric that sustains a positive culture. Regularly gather feedback and be willing to pivot strategies based on the insights gained.

Ultimately, cultural change is a continuous journey rather than a destination. By focusing on the human experience beyond structures and processes, leaders can cultivate a resilient, innovative, and thriving organizational culture.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: 1 of 850+ FREE quote slides available at misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Taking Personal Responsibility – Back to Leadership Basics

Taking Personal Responsibility – Back to Leadership Basics

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

I was first introduced to the principle of Taking Personal Responsibility when I attended a number of experiential workshops facilitated by Robert Kiyosaki who is now well known globally as the successful entrepreneurial author of the “Rich Dad Poor Dad” book series. At that time, in the late 1980s, the concept simply involved taking personal responsibility for your role in getting the results you get, in both challenging and problematic situations.

This principle has since evolved as the most crucial foundation for developing our emotionally intelligent, conscious, and transformational leadership capabilities. Largely through focusing on the development of self-awareness and self-regulation skillsets, which are especially important skills to cultivate in times of extreme uncertainty.

Blaming, Justifying, and Denying

Taking personal responsibility involves encouraging people to step up and out of blaming themselves or others, out of justifying their position or denying what is really going on to largely avoid the cognitive, emotional, and visceral results and consequences of their actions.

Which are essentially, largely unconscious defensive reactions to the problem or situation. So, it sounds quite simple, yet, even now, it’s still largely a countercultural principle, and a neurologically challenging one, because we are wired to survive (fight/flight/freeze) in the face of what we perceive as danger!

Especially when many of us are living in an oppositional blaming and shaming political environment, or within a passively or aggressively defensive organizational culture. Where a large section of the community, has been forced by the constraints of the pandemic, into fearing that their security and survival needs will not be met. Alternately, the great resignation and the nature of the virtual hybrid workplace have increased some people’s fears about even being able to get their jobs done!

All of this creates distorted thoughts and language that focus on “scarcity” where many people are fearing that they are not “enough” and do not have “enough” to deal with their current circumstances. Rather than leaning towards exploring and eliciting the possibilities and opportunities available in our abundant world.  As there is no clear playbook about how people can effectively and responsibly lead and manage in this unique 21st-century context, many people are floundering, languishing into largely emotionally overwhelmed states.

Where it is easier, and sometimes safer, to be a victim, blame and shame others for their helpless or powerless situation, or to justify and deny any need to change their perspective about it, never mind their role in causing their own anxious and unresourceful emotional states.

Back to Leadership Basics

Yet, it is more important than ever, for leaders and managers to help people:

  • Take ownership of their consequences and be responsible for the emotional, cognitive, and visceral results of their actions,
  • Authentically connect, empower, and enable people and communities to flourish,
  • Provide safe, transparent, trusted environments and interdependence where people can dare to think differently and potentially thrive.

This means that the range of crises, uncertainty, and disruptions we are experiencing now is forcing us to go back to basic 101 management and leadership principles.

According to McKinsey & Co in a recent article “A Leaders Guide – communicating with teams, stakeholders and communities during Covid 19” – “Crises come in different intensities. As a “landscape-scale” event, the coronavirus has created great uncertainty, elevated stress and anxiety, and prompted tunnel vision, in which people focus only on the present rather than toward the future. During such a crisis, when information is unavailable or inconsistent, and when people feel unsure about what they know (or anyone knows), behavioral science points to an increased human desire for transparency, guidance, and making sense out of what has happened”.

The Maturity Continuum – Shifting to I and We

The principle of taking personal responsibility has evolved and been enhanced significantly through the work of Steve Covey, in the “Seven Habits of Effective People” and provides the core foundations for transformational and conscious leadership through the “Maturity Continuum”:

  1. Dependence is the paradigm of you – you take care of me; you come through for me; you didn’t come through for me; I blame you for the results. Dependent and approval-seeking people need others to get what they want.
  2. Independence is the paradigm of I – can do it; I am responsible; I am self-reliant; I can choose. Independent people get what they want through their own efforts.
  3. Interdependence is the paradigm of we – we can do it; we can cooperate; we can combine our talents and abilities and create something greater together. Interdependent people combine their efforts with the efforts of others to achieve their greatest success.

Putting the Maturity Continuum to Work

In the early 2000s I was an associate of Corporate Vision, Australia’s first culture change and transformation consultancy, now the globally successful Walking the Talk organisation, for fourteen years.

Where every culture, leadership, team development, or change program we designed and presented, introduced taking personal responsibility, as a fundamental, core learning principle. Aligning it with the principle of – For things to change first I must change, which deeply challenged and disrupted people’s belief systems, habitual mindsets, thinking styles, and ways of acting.

As a seasoned coach of twenty years, these two core principles seem to still profoundly challenge the majority of my coaching clients across the world, no matter how senior their role or position is, or how knowledgeable, skilled, and experienced they are!

Where many managers and leaders have failed to self-regulate, lack self-awareness, and have unconsciously slipped into feeling victimized, powerless, helpless, and in some instances, even hopeless about their futures where some are:

  • Feeling frozen, inert, paralyzed, overwhelmed, and immobilized in their abilities to affect any kind of positive change in both their work and home environments.
  • Unconsciously slipping into blaming and shaming others for their situations,
  • Justifying their inertia through a range of “reasonable reasons” and “elaborate stories” about how it’s “not their fault” or it’s not “up to them” to make any change.
  • Simply denying their current consequences, or the importance of needing to take positive actions, and make changes.
  • Unmotivated, lack any desire for control, or have the personal power to affect change in their situation.

Initiating Taking Personal Responsibility

To accept and share responsibility starts with being bravely willing to courageously connect with our whole selves and consciously stepping back to hit our internal pause button, retreat into silence and stillness, and compassionately ask:

  1. What happened?
  2. What can I/we learn from it?
  3. What can I/we then do to create it?

Taking personal responsibility becomes a compassionate, creative, and courageous exercise in continuous learning, self-awareness, and emotional self-regulation in ways that safely disrupt people’s defensiveness and awaken them to the possibility of being personally powerful in tough situations.

It is also the basis for taking intelligent actions catalyze and cause positive outcomes, that deliver real solutions to crises, complex situations, and difficult business problems.

This is the first in a series of three blogs on the theme of taking responsibility – going back to leadership basics.

Find out more about our work at ImagineNation™

Find out about our learning products and tools, including The Coach for Innovators, Leaders, and Teams Certified Program, a collaborative, intimate, and deeply personalized innovation coaching and learning program, supported by a global group of peers over 9-weeks, starting Tuesday, October 18, 2022. It is a blended and transformational change and learning program that will give you a deep understanding of the language, principles, and applications of an ecosystem focus,  human-centric approach, and emergent structure (Theory U) to innovation, and upskill people and teams and develop their future fitness, within your unique context. Find out more about our products and tools.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Celebrating Failure Via Lessons in Organizational Culture

Celebrating Failure Via Lessons in Organizational Culture

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations striving for innovation and transformation must foster a culture that embraces failure as a stepping stone to success. Failure is often stigmatized, yet it serves as one of the most potent learning tools available. By celebrating failure and extracting valuable lessons, organizations can adapt, grow, and build resilience.

Understanding the Value of Failure

Failure provides insights that success cannot. It highlights weaknesses in processes, gaps in knowledge, and areas for improvement. A culture that perceives failure as an opportunity rather than a setback encourages experimentation and bold ideas, paving the way for groundbreaking innovation.

Case Study #1: Pixar Animation Studios

The Journey of “Toy Story 2”

Pixar Animation Studios is renowned for its creative brilliance, yet even such an innovative company has faced significant challenges, most notably with the production of “Toy Story 2.” What began as a direct-to-video sequel turned into a major theatrical release, overwhelming the original project plan.

During production, a near-fatal data loss almost wiped out the entire film. The project was saved by a single employee who had a backup copy on her home computer, but the incident forced the team to reflect deeply on their processes and assumptions.

In response, Pixar embraced a culture of reviewing failures openly, investing in better data resilience and project management strategies. By turning this major setback into a learning moment, Pixar transformed its production approach, enhancing communication and collaboration across teams.

Case Study #2: Tata Group

The Nano Car Failure

Tata Motors, part of the Tata Group, launched the Tata Nano in 2008 with great anticipation. Positioned as the world’s cheapest car, the Nano was expected to revolutionize the Indian automotive market.

However, the car failed to meet sales expectations due to design flaws, marketing missteps, and a mismatch with consumer perceptions. Rather than viewing the Nano as a defeat, Tata leveraged its lessons learned to enhance market research processes and product development strategies.

The company has since implemented customer-focused design principles and improved stakeholder engagement in new projects, learning from the mistakes and challenges faced with the Nano.

Principles for Cultivating a Culture that Celebrates Failure

1. Establish Psychological Safety

Employees must feel safe to take risks without fear of judgment or reprisal. Encouraging open dialogue about mistakes and the insights gained from them is crucial for fostering psychological safety.

2. Encourage Experimentation

Create an environment where experimentation is not only allowed but encouraged. Allocate resources and time for innovation projects, and celebrate the learning that comes from both successes and failures.

3. Learn and Iterate

After a failure, conduct a thorough analysis to understand what went wrong and why. Use this information to iterate and improve processes. Document these lessons so future teams can benefit from past experiences.

Conclusion

By embracing failure and integrating its lessons into the organizational fabric, companies unlock pathways to innovation and long-term success. Celebrating failure as a learning opportunity rather than a defeat cultivates a resilient and forward-thinking workplace culture.

In a world where change is the only constant, let us actively seek out and learn from failures, transforming them into stepping stones for future achievements.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.