Category Archives: Change

Reset and Reconnect to Transform your World

1 Reply

Reset and Reconnect to Transform your World

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

Our blog, Reset and Reconnect in a Chaotic World was the first in a series of three, on the theme of reconnecting and resetting, to create, invent and innovate in an increasingly chaotic world. In this blog, we described how we have opportunities, to focus on being kinder to both ourselves and to others we interact with. To help us shift our mental states to transition effectively through the shock and pain of the pandemic, and rehabilitate in ways that transform our worlds.

We also outlined the range of key reasons as to why it is critical to take personal responsibility for understanding, helping, and supporting those we depend upon, and who depend upon us, to respond in ways that are respectful and compassionate, creative and courageous.

That enables and empowers people to recover and rehabilitate from the shock and pain they are experiencing from their elevated levels of stress, discomfort, and anxiety, occurring in our relentlessly uncertain and chaotic environments, through allowing, accepting, and acknowledging where people are at – and that it’s OK to not be OK!

Neither a time to panic nor languish

Right now, it is neither a time to panic, stall nor to languish in the face of change fatigue and mental lethargy.

It is a time to shift from making binary (either/or) judgements towards making linear (both/and) judgements to re-think and create a mental state, that is open and receptive to emerging possibilities and embraces change in ways that are fair and inclusive.

To transform your world through:

  • Choosing a range of constructive and positive responses to the rising levels of global economic, civic, and social uncertainty and unrest in our own local environments.
  • Generously and kindly demonstrating care, respect, and appreciation for the value everyone brings, and by being collaborative, appreciative, helpful, and supportive.
  • Being unconditionally willing to take the “sacred pause” that allows ourselves, teams, organizations, and to reconnect and reset, through intentionally using constraints and developing a mental state that supports them to become adaptive, creative, inventive, and innovative.

Transforming your world involves co-creating a deeper sense of belonging and a more optimistic outlook, to enhance our collective intelligence toward discovering and navigating new ways of thriving, flourishing, and flowing in the face of ongoing disruption.

Integrating and balancing chaos and rigidity

Dr. Dan Siegal, in Mindsight, applies the emerging principles of interpersonal neurobiology to promote compassion, kindness, resilience, and well-being in our personal lives, our relationships, and our communities.

In our global coaching practice at ImagineNation™ we have observed that many of our clients are experiencing mental states that embody varying levels of discord, dissonance, and dis-order, which are deeply unconscious and are impacting them neurologically.

Dr. Dan Siegal states:

“At the heart of both interpersonal neurobiology and the mindsight approach is the concept of ‘integration’ which entails the linkage of different aspects of a system – whether they exist within a single person or a collection of individuals. Integration is seen as the essential mechanism of health as it promotes a flexible and adaptive way of being that is filled with vitality and creativity.

The ultimate outcome of integration is harmony. The absence of integration leads to chaos and rigidity—a finding that enables us to re-envision our understanding of mental disorders and how we can work together in the fields of mental health, education, and other disciplines, to create a healthier, more integrated world.”

We have seen a vast range of evidence of peoples’ internal and external, mental chaos, and self-imposed internal rigidity in many of our clients’ coaching sessions.

Knowing that when chaos and rigidity are prolonged – it creates unproductive or dysfunctional mental states and inflexible thought processing.

This makes people non-adaptive and mostly inflexible because their natural well-being is impaired (dis-order).

Our approach is to partner with clients to co-create a relationship, that supports and helps facilitate a set of more integrated mental states. This entails each person’s being respected for his or her autonomy and differentiated self through deep empathic communication, which creates the space and an opening for shifting mindsets and behaviors, to ultimately pull them towards a new possibility that may transform their world.

Allowing, accepting, and acknowledging

When we allow, accept, acknowledge and support people to recover and rehabilitate from the shock and pain they are experiencing as a result of recent global events and conflicts, including feelings of overwhelm, isolation, loneliness, and disconnection, we can enable them to initiate making these shifts.

According to Gallops Global Emotions 2022 Report – these are considered “negative emotions – the aggregate of the stress, sadness, anger, worry and physical pain that people feel every day” and have reached a new record in the history of their tracking.

Jon Clifton, CEO of Gallop stated in the report that their data reveals that unhappiness has been rising for more than a decade and that the world is also struggling from a silent pandemic – loneliness.

“Gallup finds that 330 million adults go at least two weeks without talking to a single friend or family member. And just because some people have friends, it doesn’t mean they have good friends. One‑fifth of all adults do not have a single person they can count on for help.”

No emotion or mental state is permanent!

It’s time to focus on exploring how to better help ourselves, our clients, people, and teams by paying deep attention and being intentional as to how we might experiment and collaborate, with three key steps, to make these shifts:

  1. Co-create relationships focused on supporting integration, by being respectful and empathic in all communications, to open space of possibility, and pull people towards what creative ideas and breakthroughs might transform their world.
  2. Artfully and masterfully generatively listen, inquire, question, and disagree, to evoke, provoke and create ideas for thinking and acting differently both today and in the future.
  3. Maximize people’s strengths, differences, and diversity, to sense, see and solve problems and be creative and inventive in delivering breakthrough ideas and innovative solutions that add value to the quality of people’s lives, in ways they appreciate and cherish.

Rehabilitate with intention

At the same time, paradoxically, extending options and choices that help them shift and transition through the shock and pain of the past two and half years.

Enabling and empowering people to rehabilitate, with intention rather than regret, adopting a systemic lens through:

  • Creating safe collective holding spaces, that embrace presence, empathy, and compassion.
  • Helping people get grounded, become mindful, and fully present, enables them to make quality connections, rebuild their confidence and recreate a sense of belonging.
  • Enabling, equipping, and empowering people with new mindsets, behaviors, and skills through unlearning, learning, and relearning so they can adapt, grow and be resourceful and resilient in the face of the range of emerging problems, opportunities, and challenges.
  • Amplifying people’s strengths, reinforcing positive emotions, mitigating and reducing the way they filter information to re-ignite their intrinsic motivation and re-engage them in what they can control, what care deeply about value, or need, to survive and thrive.

A decade of both transformation and disruption

As most of us are aware, we are currently experiencing a decade of both transformation and disruption, where chaos and order are constantly polarizing, making it imperative to support, mentor, and coach people to integrate and find their balance.

To help them become more flexible and open to being adaptive, and effectively “dance in dis-equilibrium” between the constant and consistent states of chaos and order.

To enable people to see themselves as the cause in actively unlearning and letting go of old mental models, unresourceful mental states, and thinking patterns, to reimagine and redesign how they work to transform their world and create a more compelling, inclusive, and sustainable future.

Find out more about our work at ImagineNation™

Find out about our collective, learning products and tools, including The Coach for Innovators, Leaders, and Teams Certified Program, presented by Janet Sernack, is a collaborative, intimate, and deeply personalized innovation coaching and learning program, supported by a global group of peers over 9-weeks, starting Tuesday, February 7, 2023.

It is a blended and transformational change and learning program that will give you a deep understanding of the language, principles, and applications of an ecosystem focus, human-centric approach, and emergent structure (Theory U) to innovation, and upskill people and teams and develop their future fitness, within your unique context. Find out more about our products and tools.

This is the second in a series of three blogs on the theme of reconnecting and resetting, to create, invent and innovate in an increasingly chaotic world.

You can also check out the recording of our 45-minute masterclass, to discover new ways of re-connecting through the complexity and chaos of dis-connection to create, invent and innovate in the future!

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How COVID-19 Has Exposed Us

Leave a reply

How COVID-19 Has Exposed Us

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

The moon landing in 1969 was, in many ways, the high point of the American century. Since then, we’ve been beset by scandals like Watergate, Iran-Contra and two presidential impeachments, mired in never-ending wars that we don’t win, while increasingly encumbered by rising debts and income inequality amid falling productivity growth. Incomes have stagnated while education and healthcare costs have soared.

Yet in an essay written back in February, just before the Covid-19 crisis, Ross Douthat wrote that these apparent woes are actually signs of success. In effect, he argued that we lack major technological breakthroughs because we become so technologically advanced, and we lack economic progress because we’ve become so prosperous.

Even then, it was a strange and somewhat maddening position to take. Why would Douthat, an intelligent and insightful man, write such things? Because he so wanted to believe them that he went in search for facts to support them. Many of us have been doing the same. Yet the Covid-19 crisis has unmasked us and it’s time to start facing up to the truth.

A Failed Market Revolution

In 1954, the eminent economist Paul Samuelson, came across an obscure dissertation written by a French graduate student named Louis Bachelier around the turn of the century. The paper, which anticipated Einstein’s later breakthrough on Brownian motion, declared somewhat innocently that “the mathematical expectation of the speculator is zero.”

Samuelson’s discovery launched a revolution in mathematical finance models based on on Bachelier’s assumption, including the Efficient Market Hypothesis, portfolio theory, the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Black-Scholes model. The underlying assumption was that markets were rational, and risk could be quantified and managed effectively.

The flaws in these models should have been obvious even at the time and some, including the mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot, pointed out that markets were far more volatile than the financial engineering models predicted. Nevertheless, policymakers chose to ignore the warnings and put their faith in the “magic of the market.”

Probably the biggest failure of market fundamentalism is that, as economist Thomas Philippon points out in his book The Great Reversal, over the past 40 years markets in the United States have become significantly weaker. In a similar vein, a study published in Harvard Business Review that examined 893 industries found that two thirds had become more concentrated.

The truth is that we’ve chosen weaker markets and less competition, which has led to less dynamism and innovation. That’s no accident.

Digital Disruption

In Regional Advantage, AnnaLee Saxenian describes how Silicon Valley replaced Boston’s “Technology Highway” as the center of the digital universe. While Boston was corporate and hierarchical, Silicon Valley was freewheeling and networked. The Silicon Valley ethos was very much the counterculture.

So, it was no accident that when Steve Jobs flew to New York to recruit John Sculley, who was at the time President of Pepsi, to lead Apple he asked him,”Do you want to sell sugar water for the rest of your life, or do you want to come with me and change the world?” The implication being that selling computers was a higher calling than selling soft drinks.

That was nearly 40 years ago and while the Covid-19 crisis has certainly highlighted some benefits of digital technology, such as cheap and effective teleconferencing, it’s also become clear that the digital revolution has largely been a disappointment. Productivity growth, except for a relatively brief period in the late nineties and early aughts, has been depressed since the 1970s.

Compare the iPhone to the breakthroughs of the mid-twentieth century, such as Bell Lab’s transistor, Boeing’s 707 and IBM’s 360 and it becomes clear that while digital technology has done much to disrupt industries, it’s done relatively little to create significant new value, at least in comparison to earlier technologies.

The Uncertain Promise of Globalization

The aftermath of the fall of the Berlin Wall was a time of great optimism. With the Cold War over, books like Francis Fukayama’s The End of History predicted a capitalist, democratic utopia in which free markets would conquer the world making everyone more prosperous. Those that refused to reform would be unable to compete.

While there were genuine achievements, especially in lifting up the world’s poorest, it’s hard to see how globalization has made us significantly better off. In fact, rather than the triumph of freedom, we’ve seen a global rise in populist authoritarian movements, the polar opposite of what intellectuals like Fukayama predicted.

In the United States, the situation has become especially dire. Social mobility and life expectancy in the white working class are declining, while anxiety and depression are rising to epidemic levels. While wages have stagnated, the cost of healthcare and education has soared, squeezing the middle class. Income inequality is at its highest level in 50 years.

So, while it’s true that there have been real benefits from globalization, such as curbing inflation, we’ve done little to mitigate the costs to the average citizen. That didn’t just happen but was the result of choices that we made.

We Need to Choose Resilience and Grand Challenges Over Output and Disruption

The Covid-19 crisis has unmasked us. We thought that markets, technology and globalization would save us, that we could just set up some sensible rules of the road and everything would run on autopilot. That’s clearly untrue. We took short-term profits while ignoring long-term costs, loaded up on debt and hoped for the best.

The current crisis has followed the same pattern. We simply failed to prepare for known risks because it seemed expedient not to. George Bush warned about the possibility of a pandemic as did his Health and Human Services Secretary. Jay Leno mocked them. The Obama administration set up a step-by-step playbook and it was ignored. The long list of failures goes on.

Yet we don’t have to be victims of our failed choices. We can learn to make better ones. After the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic, we embarked on a 70-year productivity boom. Out of the ashes of World War II, we built a new era of peace and prosperity that was unprecedented in world history. We can do so again. We have that power.

New technologies, under development as we speak, will likely give us the power to cure cancer, create clean energy, save the environment and colonize space. We can rebuild the middle class, usher in a new era of peace and prosperity, increase life expectancy while improving quality of life. These are all things we may be able to achieve in the next decade or two.

Yet those possibilities are merely potential that we can succeed or fail to actualize. We can, as we did after World War II, choose to invest in the future and tackle grand challenges. We can build new infrastructure, spawn new industries and create an educated workforce. Or we can, as we did after the end of the Cold War, choose disruption over construction.

What’s clear is that nothing is inevitable. The digital revolution didn’t have to be a dud. The Great Recession didn’t have to happen. The Covid-19 Pandemic could have been, at the very least, greatly mitigated. We are responsible for the choices we make. Now is the time to shoot for the moon (and Mars), not to grade ourselves on a curve.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Meet me in Manhattan – Innovation and Change Advisory

Leave a reply

Meet me in Manhattan - Innovation and Change Advisory

As the title of the site says, I focus on human-centered change and innovation, bringing in elements of design thinking, customer experience, employee experience and digital transformation as needed.

On November 18, 2022 I will be in New York City (Midtown Manhattan) and available to connect for any of the following purposes:

  • Private keynote or workshop for your organization

  • Certification session on the Change Planning Toolkit™ and/or FutureHacking™ sets of tools for your team

  • Featured keynote speaker or workshop for a sales event or conference

  • Advisory session to provide input on your innovation or transformation program, or a specific innovation project

  • Audio or video podcast appearance

  • Grab a coffee or a meal — to connect or reconnect

If you work in Manhattan or are willing to travel in from elsewhere in the greater New York City metropolitan area (or the world) and are looking to increase the innovation or transformation capabilities of your organization or to de-risk an innovation project by getting an outside perspective, please contact me.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Reality

4 Replies

Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Reality

by Braden Kelley

Recently I had the opportunity to interview Whynde Kuehn, author of the new book Strategy to Reality.

Whynde Kuehn is the Founder and Managing Director of S2E Transformation. Whynde is a recognized global thought leader and a long-time pioneer, practitioner and educator in digital transformation, strategy execution and business architecture, a foundational discipline for enabling end-to-end transformation and organizational agility. She regularly speaks, writes and chairs/co-chairs events with a mission to advance best practices and facilitate community and advocacy across the globe. Whynde is Co-Founder, Vice President, and Academic Committee Chair of the Business Architecture Guild®, a not-for-profit organization focused on the advancement of the business architecture discipline.

The interview dives into how to move big ideas into action, along with exploring several business architecture, strategy and digital transformation topics.

Without further ado, here is the transcript of that interview:

1. What is the difference between an enterprise architect and a business architect?

We can generally think of enterprise architects as professionals who facilitate the development and usage of enterprise architecture to enable effective strategy execution, decision-making, and macro-level design for their organization and the ecosystem in which it operates.
For reference, the Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations (FEAPO) characterizes enterprise architecture as “a well-defined practice for conducting enterprise analysis, design, planning, and implementation, using a holistic approach at all times, for the successful development and execution of strategy. Enterprise architecture applies architecture principles and practices to guide organizations through the business, information, process, and technology changes necessary to execute their strategies. These practices utilize the various aspects of an enterprise to identify, motivate, and achieve these changes.”

Enterprise architecture is comprised of multiple architecture domains, which we can think of as business architecture + IT architecture, where IT architecture includes application architecture, data architecture, and technical architecture. In practice, some organizations structure with architects practicing within each architecture domain specialty who collaborate with each other (with no overall enterprise architect role) while other organizations have both an overall enterprise architect role in addition to the specialized architect roles. In the latter case, while an enterprise architect focuses across all architecture domains, they often tend to be T-shaped or V-shaped where they are deeper in one specialty over another.

So, what is the difference between an enterprise architect and a business architect? The answer is somewhat dependent on the context of an organization’s structure and practice, but generally speaking, an enterprise architect practices across all architecture domains, where a business architect focuses just on the business architecture domain (and partners with other architects). Additionally, here are a few important things to keep in mind:

  • All architects should share a base set of competencies as well as those specific to their area of specialization
  • All architects should be fluent in their organization’s business architecture
  • Close partnership and integration across all architecture domains and architect roles is critical for success, this includes cohesiveness of the architecture knowledgebase as well as how architects work together (and with other roles) to deliver value to the organization
  • To maximize value, the business architect role should be business-focused and strategically positioned
  • Business architects can focus on different scopes, from the full enterprise to a set of capabilities to a specific business domain; they always consider the bigger picture though regardless of scope

2. Why do organizations need business architects?

We know that organizations are going through a time of tremendous transformation, and that change and disruption are part of our new normal. A business architecture is most useful in the context of change, which is why we have seen an increase in adoption of the discipline worldwide. Business architects help organizations to create a clear and shared macro level understanding of where the organization is today, where it is going in the future, and how it will get there.

Business architects play a unique (and often missing) role to help inform and translate strategy into the cohesive set of changes needed across people, process, and technology to make that direction real (using value streams and capabilities as a key means to organize changes). They also help to ensure alignment across an organization. This includes both ensuring that the initiatives and solutions delivered meet the original business and architectural direction as well as ensuring that investments in capabilities (implemented through people, process, and technology) are appropriately harmonized across business units, products, and geographies.

Beyond their unique role in helping to inform, translate, and align strategy to execution, business architects also help to steward their organization’s business architecture knowledgebase. A business architecture is like a blueprint that provides a shared language and mental model for an entire organization, and it is owned by the business. A business architecture can and should be used by anyone in an organization for decision-making and an important part of the business architect role is to support others in doing so.

The diagram below reflects the contemporary practice of business architecture as context for questions 1 and 2. Business architecture lives in two worlds, first as part of the enterprise architecture umbrella (right) but also as a key contributor in a strategic management context (left).

Whynde Kuehn Business Architecture Diagram

3. What does it take to be a good business architect?

There are a few characteristics that encapsulate how good business architects think and act. For example, they are value-driven and focus on business value, outcomes, and results for their organization and its customers or constituents. Business architects are business-minded with a strong command of how business works, how to evolve business models and formulate strategies to win, and how to design an organization for effectiveness and agility (this includes having a command of technology and how to leverage it strategically). They are enterprise advocates, always bringing people together across organizational silos and back to the bigger picture of the enterprise. Business architects are bridge builders, knowing that it takes an ecosystem of teams to translate strategy into action and run an organization successfully. While business architects perform unique responsibilities, they also build close partnerships with others because they realize their own success – and the success of the organization – depends on making other people successful. Business architects are also visualizers and storytellers to create clarity and common understanding and they serve as change agents for new ideas. Business architects help to simplify, visualize, and explain complex concepts and show new connections.

Beyond these characteristics, a great business architect needs a depth of knowledge and experience including building a business architecture baseline (capabilities, information concepts, and value streams) at the enterprise level architecting change initiatives, and working across the life cycle from strategy to execution.

Becoming a great business architect is a journey that takes time, but a very rewarding one along the way. A truly successful business architect majors in business architecture, but minors in other disciplines and frameworks. The most adept business architects think strategically and architecturally to facilitate strategy execution and solve complex problems, leveraging business architecture as the foundation, blended seamlessly with many other approaches and abilities. This means that great business architects continually develop and leverage a wide range of knowledge and experiences – much of it beyond the realm of business architecture.

4. What are the key components of a business architecture?

Whynde KuehnThe foundation of a business architecture is comprised of capabilities (i.e., the reusable building blocks that describe what an organization does to deliver its products and services and support its operations), value streams (i.e., the high-level flows that deliver value to an external or internal stakeholder), and a cross-mapping between them (to depict where reusable capabilities are leveraged to deliver business value). In addition, a set of information concepts underpin the capabilities and value streams – and the entire business and IT architecture – and give people a truly shared definition of key terms such as customers, partners, products, assets, and so forth.

In addition to these three fundamental business architecture domains, there are seven additional business domains that are represented through an organization’s business architecture including business units (internal business units and external partners), products (the goods and/or services an organization offers to its customers/constituents), policies (external regulations and internal polices), stakeholders, strategies, metrics, and initiatives.

In addition, business architecture connects to the domains within other disciplines as well such as to journeys from the customer experience discipline, processes from the business process management discipline, requirements from the business analysis discipline, and applications and software services in the application architecture.

A business architecture is essentially an interconnected and multidimensional set of views, stored in a reusable knowledgebase, that can be used to inform many different business scenarios.

5. Who are the key stakeholders for a business architecture?

While the overall value proposition for business architecture is to enable effective strategy execution, business architecture is a bit like a Swiss army knife in that it can be used for a broad range of business usage scenarios and decision-making.

As a result, each organization needs to define its goals for leveraging the discipline for value. For example, while many organizations leverage business architecture for informing, translating, and aligning strategies and transformations, other organizations focus on leveraging the discipline for macro level simplification and effectiveness, business and IT alignment, or even a repeatable way to approach acquisitions.

As a result, the key stakeholders for business architecture within an organization can vary based on how the discipline is being used. However, some of the most common stakeholders for business architecture include strategy and transformation leaders and their teams along with portfolio managers, strategic planners, and technology leaders from CIOs and CTOs and down. Other key stakeholders include C-level business leaders, business unit leaders, product leaders, innovation leaders, risk managers, compliance managers, program and project managers, data management leaders, human-centered designers, organization designers, organizational change managers, business process professionals, business relationship managers, business analysts, IT architects, and many more.

6. How does one “use” a business architecture?

Generally, there are three categories of usage for a business architecture: to (1) facilitate effective strategy execution as mentioned earlier, to (2) help organizations design or redesign for effectiveness and agility, and to (3) inform a wide variety of business and technology decision-making scenarios.

For organization design and redesign, consider that we can assemble capabilities in different ways to deliver new value, products, and services. We can also design our organizations with increased efficiency, for example, by reducing the number of systems needed to automate the same capability.
For decision-making, consider that a business architecture knowledgebase is the go-to place for information about an organization at a macro level. As a result, we can get holistic answers framed in a shared business context to support decision-making around strategic alignment, customer experience, product management, investments, cost, risk, compliance, outsourcing, business and IT alignment, application portfolio management, technical debt, cloud strategy and migration, sustainability, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, and more.

7. Why is it so challenging for organizations to move big ideas into action?

Organizations may formulate excellent strategies, but the challenge often occurs in the translation of those ideas across a large organization with many business units, products, and regions. I believe there are a few foundational challenges that contribute to this.

First, organizations do not always have a formalized, cohesive approach to strategy execution that knits together all the teams from end-to-end to develop strategies, architect changes, plan initiatives, execute solutions, and measure success. We may do this for parts of the process, but we do not necessarily look at the whole of strategy execution with the same criticality and accountability as we do with other functions such as sales, marketing, or finance.

Second, large organizations are still siloed in many ways, which shapes the behavior, thinking, and priorities of individuals. For example, when it comes to investments or problem solving, we may default to what is best for our business area versus thinking about what is best for the customer and the enterprise – especially when organizational structures, motivation mechanisms, and inertia enforce the status quo.

Finally, I believe that both of these challenges are also underpinned by a need to enhance business education to teach a more comprehensive approach from strategy to execution, and normalize the idea of business and IT architecture to supplement strategic thinking and decision making.

8. Digital transformation has become an overused phrase. What is a true digital transformation?

Strategy to RealityA true digital transformation is strategic and customer-driven, leveraging technology to establish business models and ecosystems that unlock new value for organizations to thrive in the digital economy. In other words, automation alone does not constitute a digital transformation. The Institute for Digital Transformation gives us clear guidance in the Digital Transformation Manifesto – that it should “lead to metamorphic change among an organization’s products, services, systems, operations, and culture – amplified by technology.”

I believe that collectively many organizations are now coming to terms with what digital transformation really means and are starting to move beyond the hype. I also think we are reaching the point where digital business is now just regular business – where digital is no longer something separate, but just part of how an organization delivers value, strategizes, and operates.

9. Where does a successful transformation begin?

A successful transformation starts with why. What does the business want to achieve and how will we know when we have achieved it? Clear business direction and outcomes provide the critical starting point so that people across an organization can accurately determine the change that is needed, both to people, processes, technology, assets, and locations – as well as the human side of change. Clear business direction also helps to inspire people to action on a collective vision that is greater than themselves.

10. Why do so many organizations fail to succeed at both strategy and execution?

Organizations can be challenged in formulating strategy, in ultimately executing upon a strategy, or both as suggested here. From a strategy formulation perspective, much has been written by strategy experts, but from my perspective, I see organizations challenged in a few key ways. For example, some organizations lack rigor in the definition of strategy itself, where the strategy does not reflect specific choices or specifies broad (and non-strategic) goals such as to improve operational effectiveness. I also see challenges with articulating strategy where different parts of an organization describe and decompose the strategy in different ways, making goals, objectives, and courses of action difficult to understand and reconcile from an enterprise perspective. Additionally, I see challenges with communicating strategy as it filters through the layers of an organization and becomes diffused – especially without a shared understanding of the courses of action and collective changes that help people relate to the direction and what it means for them.

From a strategy execution perspective, as shared in question #7, the challenges with execution (e.g., building solutions that do not meet business needs or are duplicative) often begin upstream without a well-defined translation through a common blueprint like an organization’s business architecture. This does not mean that improvements are not necessary to execution (and many shifts are happening worldwide today such as around agile delivery), but an organization should assess each major activity from strategy to execution both individually and together as a cohesive end-to-end process.

Achieving a strategy requires clear intent translated into organized effort and the structured methods from strategy management frameworks as well as business architecture and other design disciplines can help. Hopefully the increasing awareness of the opportunity – and necessity – for effective end-to-end strategy execution will inspire and enable organizations to take further action to prepare for an increasingly disruptive and exciting business landscape for years to come.

Conclusion

Thanks to you Whynde for sharing your insights with our global human-centered change and innovation community!

To learn more about Whynde’s views on making your strategy a reality, grab yourself a copy of her new book Strategy to Reality.

Image credits: Whynde Kuehn, Unsplash

 

Accelerate your change and transformation success

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

America is in Desperate Need of a Shared Purpose

Leave a reply

America is in Desperate Need of a Shared Purpose

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

In 1993, after being named IBM’s CEO as it was quickly careening toward insolvency, Lou Gerstner said, “There’s been a lot of speculation as to when I’m going to deliver a vision of IBM, and what I’d like to say to all of you is that the last thing IBM needs right now is a vision.” It was a peculiar thing to say, especially for an executive renown for his strategic acumen, and people took note.

What Gerstner meant was that IBM was broken internally. It had lost sight of itself and fallen into infighting. It no longer sought to serve the customer. Instead of collaborating, executives engaged in endless turf battles. Until IBM’s culture and values could be brought back into harmony with the market, it didn’t matter what the vision was.

Today, America has a similar plight. We are undergoing profound shifts in our racial makeup, urban concentration and generational demography in the midst of great geopolitical and technological disruption. We need to build a new social contract based on shared values that align with those shifts and, until we do that, any vision for the future will be irrelevant.

The Racial Divide

The recent incidents involving Amy Cooper and George Floyd outraged people across the world. In the former, a white woman leveraged her sense of privilege to threaten a black man in the most despicable way. In the latter, a black man was senselessly murdered at the hands of a police officer, while his colleagues sat back and watched.

What was notable about both incidents is that they were filmed and that the subjects involved knew they were being filmed but proceeded with their behavior anyway. How many times have they acted similarly off camera? There’s no way of knowing, but given the air of confidence they had in their actions, it’s hard to believe it was the first time for either.

At the same time, life expectancy for the white working class is actually declining, mostly because of “deaths of despair” due to drugs, alcohol and suicide. For those struggling and who see their friends and families undergoing similar travails, assertions of “white privilege” fall hollow. In fact, the very idea of “white privilege” intensifies the feeling that they are under attack.

The racial divide in America is wide and encompasses gaps in economic circumstances as well as values and attitudes. It doesn’t show signs of closing anytime soon. Yet until it does it’s hard to see how we can move forward as a nation.

The Urban-Rural Divide

In addition to the racial divide in America, we have a stark urban-rural divide that seems to keep widening. While having some gap between city and country dwellers is quite common all over the world, in America that gap is almost uniquely vast and encompasses a number of political and economic forces.

Politically, the fact that each state has two senators gives rural states with small populations an advantage in determining federal policy. On the other hand, because capitals tend to be in cities, those who work in government tend to be more liberal than their rural counterparts. Voting data has long shown that the urban and suburban areas tend to vote Democrat and exurban and rural areas tend to prefer Republicans.

On the economic side, cities wield enormous power. Most major corporations are headquartered in urban areas and large industries tend to agglomerate around specific cities, such as finance in New York, entertainment in Los Angeles and technology in San Francisco. Some observers have also noted that, as housing costs in key cities rise they are beginning to hemorrhage mid and low skill workers who tend to be less educated.

Much like the racial divide, the urban-rural divide is heavily rooted in values and attitudes. While city dwellers often dismiss rural areas as “fly-over country,” those who live in rural areas feel disrespected and unrecognized. They often complain that their communities are being dictated to by people in other places who live other kinds of lives, which leaves them angrily seeking political redress.

The Demographic Divide

In addition to the racial and urban-rural divides, we are also beginning to see a massive generational shift. Over the next decade, baby-boomers, many of whom came of age during the Reagan revolution, will be replaced by millennials, whose experiences with the Great Recession, debilitating student loan debt and rising healthcare costs, have very different priorities.

The main drivers of the Baby Boomer’s influence have been its size and economic prosperity. In America alone, 76 million people were born in between 1946 and 1964, and they came of age in the prosperous years of the 1960s. These factors gave them unprecedented political and economic clout that continues to this day.

Yet now, Millennials, who are more diverse and focused on issues such as the environment and tolerance, are beginning to outnumber Baby Boomers. Much like in the 1960s, their increasing influence is driving trends in politics, the economy and the workplace and their values often put them in conflict with the baby boomers.

However, unlike the Baby Boomers, Millennials are coming of age in an era where prosperity seems to be waning. With Baby Boomers retiring and putting further strains on the economy, especially with regard to healthcare costs, tensions are on the rise

A Problem of Identity and Dignity

In 1989, standing on Kosovo Polje, in a ceremony commemorating the Battle of Kosovo, in which the Serbian army was annihilated by the Ottomans in 1389, Slobodan Milošević told his followers, “No one should dare to beat you again!” Since then, we have seen a wide array of leaders, from Vladimir Putin to Donald Trump, leverage our innate need for recognition and collective identity to whip us into a frenzy.

Amy Cooper threatened a black man because he refused to recognize her privilege and she immediately called the police, with whom she obviously felt a shared identity. The Tea Party was driven, in large part, by older Americans who felt that younger Americans, who they did not feel a shared identity with, wanted to “freeload” off the country they worked their lives to build.

We can expect that as long as these divisions remain, there will be politicians and others who will seek to exploit them for personal gain. If we were still a white, Christian country in a simpler world, things would be easier, but we would lose all of the incalculable benefits that come with diversity, including more dynamism, innovation and culture. Much like IBM in the 90s, we cannot move forward until we heal our internal divisions.

Nothing about a multi-ethnic, multicultural society is simple. Building anything worthwhile takes work and no small amount of pain. Still, we need to try harder. We need to rebuild our society, culture and values based on a new basis of shared purpose. Until we do that, nothing else will really matter.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Anticipatory Organization

Leave a reply

Building Agility Through Foresight

The Anticipatory Organization

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world defined by the relentless pace of change, the very concept of building an agile organization has become a non-negotiable cornerstone of modern business strategy. But what if true agility wasn’t just about speed or adaptability in the face of change? What if it was about the profound capacity to anticipate, prepare for, and proactively shape the future? This is the defining characteristic of what I call the Anticipatory Organization, and its secret lies in the powerful, symbiotic relationship between foresight and agility.

Most organizations treat agility as a reactive muscle—a means to respond quickly when a crisis hits or a new trend emerges. While this reactive agility is undoubtedly valuable, it’s often born from a necessity to catch up. The Anticipatory Organization, however, operates on a different plane. It practices proactive agility, built on a foundation of strategic foresight. This allows leaders and teams to look beyond the immediate horizon, identify emerging signals, understand potential disruptions, and strategically position themselves for success. It’s about being ready for what’s next, not just reacting to what just happened.

The Indispensable Partnership: Foresight Fuels Agility

Strategic foresight isn’t about attempting to predict the future with perfect accuracy—that’s a fool’s errand. Instead, it’s a systematic, human-centered discipline that explores alternative futures, identifies the driving forces of change (technological, social, political, economic), and uncovers potential opportunities and threats. When this discipline is combined with an agile operational model, it fundamentally transforms an organization’s capacity to:

  • Anticipate & Prepare: By understanding plausible future scenarios, organizations can develop contingency plans, identify necessary skill sets, and allocate resources more effectively before disruption becomes a reality.
  • Proactively Innovate: Foresight reveals unmet human needs and emerging market spaces, guiding innovation efforts towards creating future-proof products, services, and business models, rather than merely optimizing existing ones. This is about building the future, not just adapting to it.
  • Mitigate Risk: Identifying potential threats early allows for the development of robust strategies to reduce their impact or even pivot to turn them into new opportunities.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: Foresight provides a richer, more robust context for current decisions, ensuring they are not just optimized for today, but are also aligned with plausible future states.
  • Build Resilience: Organizations that systematically engage with foresight are better equipped to weather unforeseen challenges, bounce back faster, and even emerge stronger, because they have already mentally and strategically explored what a major disruption might entail.

Without foresight, agility can devolve into aimless thrashing; without agility, foresight remains a purely academic exercise. Together, they create a powerful engine for sustained competitive advantage in turbulent times.

“Agility without foresight is merely fast reaction; foresight without agility is just wishful thinking. The true power lies in their synergy, creating a truly anticipatory organization.”

Integrating Foresight into Your Organizational DNA

Shifting towards an anticipatory, foresight-driven agile culture isn’t a simple task; it requires intentional effort and a deep, systemic integration across the organization:

  1. Establish a Foresight Capability: This could be a dedicated team, cross-functional working groups, or leveraging external expertise. The key is to have a structured, ongoing process for scanning the horizon for weak signals.
  2. Democratize Futures Thinking: Do not confine foresight to the executive suite. Train employees at all levels to identify early signals of change, question core assumptions, and think critically about the long-term implications of their work.
  3. Develop Scenarios, Not Predictions: Instead of trying to pinpoint ‘the future,’ build multiple plausible future scenarios. This helps organizations think in terms of possibilities and prepares them to be agile in a range of potential outcomes.
  4. Link Foresight Directly to Strategy & Innovation: Ensure that insights gleaned from foresight directly inform your strategic planning, R&D roadmaps, and portfolio decisions. This is how ideas become action.
  5. Foster an Experimentation Culture: Foresight identifies promising areas for exploration. Agility provides the crucial framework to quickly prototype, test, and learn from these explorations in a low-risk environment, turning a potential future into a tangible reality.

Case Study 1: Nokia’s Missed Opportunity – A Cautionary Tale of Foresight Without Agility

The Challenge:

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Nokia was the undisputed global leader in mobile phones. They were agile in manufacturing, supply chain, and hardware innovation, dominating market share with their feature phones. However, despite conducting extensive research into future mobile trends, including internet-enabled devices and touchscreens, their internal structure and core assumptions prevented them from acting on these insights effectively.

Foresight’s Glimmer, Agility’s Blindness:

Nokia’s research teams, in many ways, did possess foresight. They explored concepts that predated the iPhone and had a deep understanding of evolving consumer needs. However, their organizational agility was fundamentally constrained by several factors:

  • The Incumbent’s Dilemma: An overpowering focus on optimizing their existing, highly successful business model (hardware sales, a proprietary OS, and strong operator relationships) overshadowed the need for the radical, transformative shifts that were clearly on the horizon.
  • Internal Silos: Different divisions often operated independently, hindering the necessary cross-functional integration of hardware, software, and services needed for a true smartphone experience.
  • Organizational Inertia: The company’s established decision-making processes were too slow and hierarchical to respond to the rapid market shift initiated by Apple and Google.

The Result:

Nokia possessed fragments of foresight but lacked the organizational agility to translate those insights into decisive, coordinated action. They saw the icebergs but couldn’t steer the ship fast enough, ultimately losing their market dominance to more anticipatory and agile competitors. This serves as a powerful reminder that foresight without the ability to act on it is ultimately ineffective.

Case Study 2: Netflix’s Continuous Reinvention – Foresight as a Compass for Agile Growth

The Challenge:

Netflix started as a DVD-by-mail service, a business model that, while innovative at the time, had a clear technological and human-centric expiration date. To survive and thrive, they needed to navigate seismic shifts in technology, content consumption, and competitive landscapes.

Foresight-Driven Agility in Action:

Netflix consistently demonstrated an exceptional ability to integrate foresight into its agile operating model, becoming the quintessential Anticipatory Organization:

  • Anticipating Streaming (Early 2000s): Even while dominating DVD rentals, Netflix saw the internet’s potential for content delivery. They began investing in streaming infrastructure and licensing content years before it became mainstream, showing incredible foresight and proactive preparation. They were building the future, not waiting for it.
  • Embracing Original Content (Early 2010s): Recognizing the future value of proprietary content and the rising costs of licensing, Netflix made a bold, foresight-driven move into original programming, transforming from a mere distributor into a global content powerhouse. This required massive investments and a fundamentally agile approach to content creation and production, all based on a future-focused bet.
  • Global Expansion & Localization: Foresight into global market potential and the need for localized content and user experience drove their aggressive, yet agile, international expansion strategy. They didn’t simply enter markets; they tailored their offerings to each region’s unique preferences.
  • Data-Driven Adaptation: Netflix uses vast amounts of data to continually understand viewer preferences, predict trends, and agilely adapt its content recommendations, production strategy, and platform features. Their A/B testing culture is a testament to their agile execution on foresight-driven hypotheses.

The Result:

Netflix’s journey from a DVD rental company to a global streaming and content production giant is a masterclass in building agility through foresight. They didn’t just react to market changes; they anticipated them, made bold strategic bets, and used their agile operational model to execute on those bets with remarkable speed and effectiveness. Their sustained success stems from a culture that actively scans the horizon, embraces potential futures, and then rapidly iterates and adapts to bring those futures to fruition.

Conclusion: Leading with Intentional Preparedness

In an unpredictable world, organizations cannot afford to merely be agile in reaction. True competitive advantage stems from intentional preparedness — the powerful combination of strategic foresight guiding proactive agility. By developing a robust foresight capability, democratizing futures thinking, and systematically linking insights to strategy and innovation, leaders can empower their organizations to not just survive change, but to actively shape the future for their customers and themselves.

Embrace foresight as your compass, and agility as your engine. Together, they will navigate your organization through the fog of uncertainty, positioning you to not just adapt to the future, but to create it. It’s time to build not just a faster ship, but one that knows where it’s going, long before the storm hits.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: One of 900+ FREE quote slides for your meetings and presentations at http://misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Using Storytelling to Galvanize Action

Leave a reply

From Vision to Reality

Using Storytelling to Galvanize Action

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the complex landscape of modern business, where data often reigns supreme, we sometimes overlook one of humanity’s oldest and most powerful tools for influence: storytelling. As a human-centered change leader, I’ve seen countless brilliant visions and innovative strategies gather dust because they failed to capture the hearts and minds of the people who needed to bring them to life. The gap between a visionary idea and its tangible implementation is often bridged not by spreadsheets and Gantt charts alone, but by compelling narratives. Storytelling is the essential ingredient that translates abstract concepts into emotional resonance, galvanizing individuals and teams to move from passive understanding to inspired action.

Think about it: our brains are hardwired for stories. From ancient myths to modern advertisements, narratives help us make sense of the world, connect with others, and remember information far more effectively than facts and figures alone. In a corporate context, a well-crafted story can do more than just inform; it can align, motivate, and inspire. It allows leaders to articulate a compelling future, explain the ‘why’ behind challenging changes, and create a shared sense of purpose that unites diverse stakeholders. When people see themselves as part of a larger, meaningful narrative, they are far more likely to embrace change, overcome obstacles, and commit their energy to achieving a common goal. This is the essence of human-centered leadership: connecting with people on an emotional level to drive tangible results.

To effectively use storytelling to galvanize action, consider these human-centered principles:

  • Identify Your Core Message: What is the single, most important idea you want to convey? This becomes the central theme of your story.
  • Know Your Audience: Tailor your story to resonate with the specific experiences, values, and concerns of your listeners. What are their challenges? What inspires them?
  • Craft a Compelling Arc: Every good story has a beginning (the current state/challenge), a middle (the journey/change), and an end (the desired future/impact). Build tension, introduce characters, and show transformation.
  • Emphasize Emotion and Empathy: Stories connect emotionally. Use vivid language, relatable characters, and appeals to shared values to evoke empathy and build a deeper connection.
  • Call to Action: Your story should naturally lead to a clear, actionable next step. What do you want people to do after hearing your story? Make it clear how they fit into the narrative.
  • Be Authentic: The most powerful stories come from a place of genuine belief and vulnerability. Share personal experiences or anecdotes that lend credibility and humanize your message.

Case Study 1: Steve Jobs and the “1,000 Songs in Your Pocket” Story

The Challenge: Introducing a Revolutionary Product in a Skeptical Market

When Apple launched the iPod in 2001, portable music players were not new. However, existing devices were often clunky, had limited storage, and were difficult to use. Steve Jobs faced the challenge of not just introducing another gadget, but convincing the world that this new device was fundamentally different and would change their relationship with music.

Storytelling in Action:

Jobs didn’t lead with technical specifications. Instead, he painted a vivid, relatable picture of a future where music was effortlessly accessible. His iconic phrase, “1,000 songs in your pocket,” wasn’t just a feature; it was a powerful narrative that spoke to a common human desire for convenience, abundance, and personal connection to music. He described a frustration (carrying CDs), then offered a magical solution (the iPod), making it easy for people to envision themselves experiencing this future. He framed the iPod as a gateway to personal freedom and enjoyment, not just a piece of hardware. This simple, elegant story immediately resonated, contrasting sharply with the technical jargon typically used in product launches.

The Impact:

The iPod became an instant sensation and revolutionized the music industry. Jobs’s ability to tell a compelling story about what the product meant for users, rather than simply what it did, was crucial to its adoption. It galvanized both consumers and developers, creating a powerful ecosystem around Apple’s vision for digital music. This case highlights how storytelling can transform a product launch into a movement, demonstrating that emotional connection, not just technical specifications, is key to galvanizing action and achieving market dominance.

Key Insight: Framing innovation as a solution to a relatable human problem, told through a simple yet powerful narrative, can create emotional resonance that drives widespread adoption and market transformation.

Case Study 2: Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” Speech

The Challenge: Uniting a Nation and Inspiring Action Towards Social Justice

In 1963, the Civil Rights Movement faced immense challenges, including systemic discrimination, violence, and deeply entrenched racial inequality. Martin Luther King Jr. needed to articulate a vision for a just future that could unite diverse groups, give hope to the oppressed, and galvanize an entire nation towards moral and political action.

Storytelling in Action:

King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is a masterclass in using narrative to galvanize action. He began by acknowledging the historical context and the “shameful condition” of racial injustice, creating a shared understanding of the problem. He then transitioned into a vivid, aspirational story of a future America where equality and freedom reigned. Using powerful metaphors, biblical allusions, and repetition, he painted a picture that was both deeply personal and universally resonant. His “dream” was not a policy paper; it was an emotionally charged vision of a better world that listeners could see, feel, and believe in. He skillfully evoked both the pain of the present and the promise of the future, compelling his audience to become active participants in fulfilling that dream.

The Impact:

The speech became a defining moment of the Civil Rights Movement, inspiring millions and contributing significantly to the legislative changes that followed, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. King’s storytelling didn’t just communicate a message; it ignited a shared sense of purpose and urgency. It demonstrated that by articulating a compelling vision through a narrative framework, leaders can inspire collective action on an unprecedented scale, transforming societies and achieving profound human-centered change.

Key Insight: A compelling, emotionally resonant narrative that bridges the gap between present struggles and an aspirational future can unite diverse groups and inspire collective action for profound societal change.

Bringing Your Vision to Life Through Story

Whether you’re launching a new product, leading organizational change, or advocating for a social cause, the ability to tell a compelling story is your most potent tool for human-centered innovation. Data provides the evidence, but stories provide the meaning. They transform abstract visions into vivid realities, allowing people to see themselves within the narrative and understand their role in bringing it to fruition. By mastering the art of storytelling, leaders can move beyond simply informing their audience to truly inspiring them, galvanizing the action necessary to turn even the boldest visions into tangible, impactful realities.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: One of 900+ FREE quote slides for your meetings and presentations at http://misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How Do You Judge Innovation: Guilty or Innocent?

1 Reply

How Do You Judge Innovation: Guilty or Innocent?

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

Several months ago, a colleague sent me a link to Roger Martin’s latest article, “The Presumption of Guilt: The Hidden Logical Barrier to Innovation.”  Even though the article was authored by one of the preeminent thinkers in the field of innovation and strategy (in 2017, Thinkers50 voted him the #1 most influential management thinker in the world), I didn’t have too much hope that I would read something new or interesting. After all, I read A LOT of articles, and 99 times out of 100, I’m disappointed (80 times out of 100, I roll my eyes so hard I give myself a headache).

This one blew my mind.

With just a few sentences and applying a well-known analogy, Martin explained a phenomenon that plagues every organization and kills most innovation.

Presumed Innocence is a fundamental human right

Martin begins by pointing out that in the legal systems of modern democracies, all citizens are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In 1948, the United Nations extended this concept to all nations (not just democracies) in Article 11.1 of their Declaration of Human Rights.

The presumption of innocence is so important because “the presumption of guilt (or even neutrality) puts an almost impossible burden on the defendant. The State is strong and has resources far beyond that of the individual.”

Presumed Innocence is not a fundamental innovation right

Now let’s apply this analogy and the lens of presumption of innocence or guilt to business, arguably a field where we spend much more time and make far more judgments.

You, and your fellow decision-makers, are judges and jury.

It is up to you to determine whether the projects in front of you are innocent (worthy of additional investment) or guilty (not worthy).

If you presume all defendants are guilty, you place the burden of proof on them. They must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they will succeed and are, therefore, worthy of investment.

If you presume all defendants are innocent, you place the burden of proof on yourself (or the business as a whole). You must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they will fail.

What type of judge are you? What kind of decision-making system do you preside over? Do you presume guilt or innocence?

In most boardrooms, projects are presumed guilty.

Presumptions in practice

Let’s consider the two “defendants” (types of projects) that appear before you – core business projects and innovation projects.

Each defendant has a team of advocates. The core business typically has a large team with ample resources and a history of success. Innovation has a much smaller team with far fewer resources and few, if any, “in-market” successes.

To be fair, you ask the same questions of both defendants – questions about market growth, performance versus competitors, and what the P&L looks like.

The team advocating for the core business produces data-filled slides, reports from reputable third parties, and financials blessed by Finance. In the deluge of facts, you forget that all the data is about the past, and you’re making decisions about the future. You find the evidence compelling (or at least reassuring), determine that the team met their burden of proof, declare the Core Business innocent, and allocate additional funds and people.

Innovation’s team also comes with slides, reports, and financials, but it’s not nearly as compelling as what you just saw from the current business team. But you are a fair judge, so you ask most questions like

  • We believe we can get X% of a Total Addressable Market estimated to be Y
  • There are no direct competitors, but consumers rated this better than current solutions
  • We don’t have a 5-year NPV or P&L for this business at scale because we’re not asking for permission to launch. We’re asking for $100,000 to continue testing.

Believe? We need to know!

No direct competitors? Perhaps there’s a reason for that!

No P&L? I’m not going to throw scarce money away!

“Guilty!” you declare, “no more resources for you! Try again!”

This example illustrates what Roger Martin considers corporate innovation’s fatal flaw. In his article, he argues,

“the status quo must play the role of the prosecutor and prove that the innovation is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The innovation asserts its case, laying out the future that it imagines is plausible and explains the logic that buttresses the plausibility. The onus is on the status quo to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the innovation’s logic is flawed — e.g., the proposed economics are unrealistic, customers haven’t shown a hint of caring about the unique selling features of the innovation, competitors already have a lead on us in the proposed area, etc.

If the status quo can do so, then the innovation is guilty. If it can’t, then the innovation is not guilty, and the organization should invest.”

As much as I love the idea of requiring the status quo (managers? Executives? Stockholders?) to prove that investments should not be made (i.e., the default answer is “Yes” to all requests), it’s just not a practical solution.

Burden of proof as barrier

There’s another fundamental principle in our legal system that Martin doesn’t touch on: the burden of proof shifts as the stakes increase.

Specifically, the State’s burden of proof increases from warrant to arraignment to grand jury to trial. For example, the State must provide probable cause based on direct or other reliable information to get a warrant. But the State must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt when the defendant goes to trial and risks losing their freedom or even their life.

But in the example above, the questions (proof required) remained the same.

The questions were appropriate for the Current Business because it’s already in the market, consuming massive resources, and its failure would have a catastrophic impact on the company.

But the questions aren’t appropriate for innovation in its early days. In fact, they were the business equivalent of demanding proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to get a search warrant. Instead, a judge evaluating a project in the early Design phase should ask for probable cause based on direct or other reliable information – observed consumer behavior, small-scale research findings, or simple prototypes.

The Verdict is In

I love the concept of Presumed Guilty vs. Presumed Innocent. I see it all the time in my work, and it is painfully prevalent in Innovation Council meetings and other boardrooms where managers sit as judge and jury over a project’s (ad a team’s) fate.

I want to flip the paradigm – To make “yes” the default instead of “No” and to require managers, the keepers of the status quo, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a project will fail.

But I don’t think it’s possible (if I’m wrong, PLEASE tell me!).

Instead, our best bet for true innovation justice is not to shift who bears the burden of proof but rather how heavy that burden is at various points. From probable cause when the stakes are low to beyond a reasonable doubt when they’re high. And certainly more than a ham sandwich at any point

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

What Great Transformational Leaders Learn from Their Failures

Leave a reply

What Great Transformational Leaders Learn from Their Failures

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

We tend to think of transformational leaders emerging fully actualized. We look for early indications of promise, sure that there must have been nascent signs of greatness from the start. It’s hard to imagine those that attain the highest level of achievement are anything less than destined for greatness.

While talent clearly plays an important role in success, most talented people live their lives without any great distinction. Some attain some moderate level of achievement, but simply go unnoticed. Others even fail miserably. A few hit on the right mix of luck, skill, time and place that catapults them to greatness.

What’s interesting about the stories behind so many of those of remarkable achievement is how they often begin with heartbreaking tales of desperation and failure. Yet, those failures didn’t define their path. In fact, very much the opposite. It is what they learned from their early struggles and failures that helped make them the historic figures we know today.

The Prelude to a Miracle Year

When we think of Albert Einstein, we inevitably conjure up images of the icon rather than the man. We see Einstein with his wild hair and his tongue sticking out or Einstein as a playful old man, riding a bicycle. We remember his cheerful confidence and his easy comfort with his own genius. He wasn’t always that way.

The younger Einstein, the one who actually came up with the ideas that established his place in history rather than the world-famous scientist he became, was far different. Reeling from chronic unemployment and a troubled marriage, he fell into a deep depression, became nearly suicidal and wrote to his sister in a letter:

What depresses me most is the misfortune of my poor parents who have not had a happy moment for so many years. What further hurts me deeply is that as an adult man, I have to look on without being able to do anything. I am nothing but a burden to my family…It would be better off if I were not alive at all.

His father would pass away a few years later. By that time, the young Albert Einstein did find work as a lowly government clerk. Soon after, in 1905, he unleashed four papers in quick succession that would change the world. It was an accomplishment so remarkable that it is now referred to as his miracle year.

Einstein’s years of struggle changed him. The brash, arrogant boy became a very different man, open to the ideas of others. In 1924, by this time world famous, he received a letter from an obscure Indian physicist named Satyendra Bose. Many would have simply ignored it, but he took interest, translated it from English to German himself and submitted it to a journal.

The paper proved to be a breakthrough and Bose was nominated for a Nobel Prize. Einstein, for his part, is remembered as much for his humanity as for his genius.

Gandhi’s Himalayan Miscalculation

In 1919, Mahatma Gandhi initiated a campaign of civil disobedience, including the sale of banned literature, fasting, prayer and work stoppages, to protest the oppressive Rowlatt Acts the British had recently passed. These were an immediate success, but soon turned disastrous and ultimately ended with the massacre at Amritsar.

He would later call this his Himalayan miscalculation. “I realized that before a people could be fit for offering civil disobedience, they should thoroughly understand its deeper implications,” he would later write. So, Gandhi spent a decade doing just that, training a cadre of followers in his philosophy of Satyagraha or ‘truth force’.

Another opportunity would present itself a decade later, when the Indian National Congress asked Gandhi to design a campaign of civil disobedience in support of independence. This time, rather than rashly calling for national action, he meditated for weeks before deciding to march 240 miles with a limited number of followers to defy the British salt laws.

Today, the Salt March is known as Gandhi’s greatest triumph. It was the first time that the British was forced to negotiate with the Indians and, because it demonstrated that the Raj could be defied, helped lead to Indian independence in 1947. Yet without that earlier failure, it would likely not have been possible.

Mandela’s Rivonia Trial

In 1964, Nelson Mandela stood in court at what is now known as the Rivonia Trial accused of sabotage, a crime for which he was surely guilty. Many believed he would be sentenced to death. Yet rather than succumb to his fate, he decided to use the trial to showcase his values in a speech that would be remembered as a key moment in South African history.

“I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities,” Mandela said. “It is an ideal, which I hope to live for and to achieve. But if it needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”

He was sentenced to life in prison and would serve 27 years. During his incarceration, his statements were banned from public consumption. The Apartheid regime thought that by imprisoning both his body and his ideas that both would eventually die out. They were wrong on all counts. In prison, Mandela became a symbol of the injustice of the Apartheid system.

When Mandela was finally released and rose to become President of South Africa, he stayed true to the ideals he spoke of in that famous speech. Although many of his political allies urged him to seek retribution, he pushed for reconciliation. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993.

Transformation is Always a Journey, Never a Destination

Today, Einstein, Gandhi and Mandela have become iconic figures. Einstein has become synonymous with genius, Gandhi with dignity and Mandela with courage. Yet they didn’t simply emerge fully formed. It was, in large part, their struggles that shaped the men they would become.

Einstein, although clearly a genius, couldn’t find a job at a university. As a young lawyer, Gandhi was so shy he couldn’t bring himself to address the court. Mandela started out as an extreme black nationalist. “I was angry at the white man, not at racism,” he would later write. They would all evolve and grow over time.

As I wrote in Cascades, transformation is always a journey, never a destination. We don’t idolize Einstein just for his equations, but also for his humanity. We remember Gandhi not for the violence he unleashed in 1919, but for the peace he helped to bring about later on. Most people have never heard Mandela’s famous speech, but his ability to forgive and reconcile shaped an entire nation and inspired the world.

In a sense, it’s a shame that we hear so much about triumphs and so little about the dark times of our heroes. It was, to a large extent, those early struggles that led to their greatness, not the failures themselves, but finding the will and strength to see it all through. Clearly, we are going through some dark times ourselves right now, but our journey is not over. Our future is ours to make.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Helping Your Workforce Thrive Amidst Uncertainty

Leave a reply

From Resistance to Resilience

Helping Your Workforce Thrive Amidst Uncertainty

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world defined by constant change—where market shifts, technological disruptions, and economic volatility are the new normal—the traditional approach to managing change is failing. We often view employee resistance as a barrier to be overcome, a problem to be solved through better communication or more stringent mandates. But what if we re-frame the narrative? Instead of fighting resistance, what if we focused on building resilience? The most successful organizations today understand that their greatest asset is a workforce that can not only cope with uncertainty but thrive in it. This requires a human-centered approach that moves beyond simple change management to true human-centered transformation.

The natural human reaction to change is often fear, anxiety, and a feeling of loss of control. This isn’t resistance for its own sake; it’s a deeply human response to a perceived threat. Trying to push past this without addressing the underlying emotions is like trying to drive a car with the brakes on. A resilient workforce, by contrast, is one that has the psychological safety, emotional intelligence, and adaptive skills to navigate turbulent times. It’s a group of people who see uncertainty not as a threat, but as an opportunity to learn, grow, and innovate. Building this resilience requires a profound shift in leadership mindset and a focus on cultivating a culture of trust and support.

Helping your workforce move from resistance to resilience involves a strategic and empathetic approach. Key elements of this human-centered blueprint include:

  • Cultivating Psychological Safety: Creating an environment where employees feel safe to express concerns, admit mistakes, and experiment without fear of punishment. Psychological safety is the bedrock of resilience, enabling risk-taking and learning.
  • Empowering Autonomy: Giving employees a sense of control over their work and their schedules. Autonomy is a powerful antidote to the feeling of helplessness that often accompanies uncertainty.
  • Prioritizing Well-being: Recognizing that resilience is a product of physical and mental health. Providing resources and actively encouraging rest, mindfulness, and work-life balance are no longer optional—they are strategic necessities.
  • Fostering a Growth Mindset: Shifting the organizational narrative from one of fixed skills and outcomes to one of continuous learning and development. A growth mindset allows individuals to view challenges as opportunities for skill-building.
  • Communicating with Radical Transparency: Being honest and open about the reasons for change, the potential risks, and the vision for the future. Transparency builds trust, and trust is the currency of resilience.

Case Study 1: The Transformation of Adobe’s Performance Review System

The Challenge: A Rigid and Demoralizing Performance Management System

For years, Adobe, like many other large companies, relied on a traditional, annual performance review system. This process, often referred to as “stack ranking,” was time-consuming, demotivating, and created a culture of internal competition rather than collaboration. It was a source of fear and anxiety, especially during periods of company-wide change, and it stifled the very creativity and innovation that a company like Adobe depends on.

The Human-Centered Solution:

In 2012, Adobe’s leadership decided to scrap the traditional system entirely. They replaced it with a new, human-centered approach called “Check-ins.” This system prioritized continuous, informal conversations between managers and employees, with a focus on coaching, feedback, and goal alignment. The new model was designed to foster a growth mindset, empowering employees to take ownership of their development and focus on learning from mistakes. It was a direct response to a rigid system that was causing resistance and burnout. By eliminating the fear and stress associated with traditional reviews, Adobe aimed to build a more resilient workforce that could adapt and innovate more freely.

The Results:

The results were transformative. The new system led to a significant increase in employee engagement, a decrease in voluntary turnover, and a noticeable boost in productivity. Employees reported feeling more valued, and managers were able to provide more timely and constructive feedback. The shift demonstrates that by removing a source of fear and replacing it with a human-centered system built on trust and continuous learning, an organization can transform its culture and foster a profound sense of resilience among its employees. It was a clear case of designing a system that empowered people to thrive, rather than just survive, amidst a culture of change.

Key Insight: Removing rigid and fear-based systems and replacing them with human-centered, trust-based models can dramatically increase employee engagement and build organizational resilience.

Case Study 2: Patagonia’s Commitment to Employee Well-being and Activism

The Challenge: Navigating a Highly Competitive and Uncertain Retail Market

Patagonia, the outdoor apparel company, operates in a global retail market characterized by intense competition and significant supply chain uncertainties. To navigate this volatility, Patagonia has consciously chosen to build a resilient workforce by prioritizing employee well-being and a shared sense of purpose. Instead of pushing employees to their limits for short-term gains, the company invests in their long-term health and emotional connection to the brand’s mission.

The Human-Centered Solution:

Patagonia’s strategy for resilience is built on several key pillars. They offer on-site childcare, flexible work schedules, and a unique “environmental internship” program where employees can work for environmental non-profits for up to two months, all while receiving their regular pay and benefits. The company’s commitment to radical transparency is also a core part of its culture, openly communicating its supply chain practices, successes, and failures. This fosters a sense of trust and shared purpose, connecting the workforce to something bigger than their daily tasks. By empowering employees with autonomy and a sense of shared purpose, Patagonia has created a highly engaged and resilient team that is willing to adapt and innovate in the face of market shifts.

The Results:

Patagonia consistently ranks as one of the best companies to work for, and its employees are deeply loyal and committed to the brand. This high level of engagement translates into a strong ability to withstand market pressures. When faced with economic downturns or supply chain disruptions, Patagonia’s workforce is not only more resilient but also more creative and proactive in finding solutions. The case of Patagonia demonstrates that a focus on human well-being, purpose, and trust is not a trade-off for performance but is, in fact, the most powerful driver of long-term organizational resilience and success. It proves that by investing in people, you build a foundation strong enough to weather any storm.

Key Insight: Building a culture of purpose and well-being, rather than a culture of constant pressure, is the most effective way to foster a resilient and adaptable workforce.

The Path to a Resilient Future

The days of managing change through top-down mandates are over. The future belongs to leaders who understand that resilience is not a trait to be hired for, but a muscle to be developed through a human-centered approach. By cultivating psychological safety, prioritizing well-being, empowering autonomy, and communicating with transparency, you can move your workforce from a state of fear and resistance to one of strength and adaptability. The journey to resilience begins by putting people—and their needs—at the very heart of your change strategy. This is not just a better way to manage change; it is the only way to ensure your organization is equipped to thrive in the uncertain decades ahead.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.