Tag Archives: trust

Productive Disagreement Requires Trust

Productive Disagreement Requires Trust

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

When there’s disagreement between words and behavior, believe the behavior. This is especially true when the words deny the behavior.

When there’s disagreement between the data and the decision, the data is innocent.

When there’s agreement that there’s insufficient data but a decision must be made, there should be no disagreement that the decision is judgment-based.

When there’s disagreement on the fact that there’s no data to support the decision, that’s a problem.

When there’s disagreement on the path forward, it’s helpful to have agreement on the process to decide.

When there’s disagreement among professionals, there is no place for argument.

When there’s disagreement, there is respect for the individual and a healthy disrespect for the ideas.

When there’s disagreement, the decisions are better.

When there’s disagreement, there’s independent thinking.

When there’s disagreement, there is learning.

When there’s disagreement, there is vulnerability.

When there’s disagreement, there is courage.

When there’s disagreement, there is trust.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of April 2023

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of April 2023Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are April’s ten most popular innovation posts:

  1. Rethinking Customer Journeys — by Geoffrey A. Moore
  2. What Have We Learned About Digital Transformation Thus Far? — by Geoffrey A. Moore
  3. Design Thinking Facilitator Guide — by Douglas Ferguson
  4. Building A Positive Team Culture — by David Burkus
  5. Questions Are More Powerful Than We Think — by Greg Satell
  6. 3 Examples of Why Innovation is a Leadership Problem — by Robyn Bolton
  7. How Has Innovation Changed Since the Pandemic? — by Robyn Bolton
  8. 5 Questions to Answer Before Spending $1 on Innovation — by Robyn Bolton
  9. Customers Care About the Destination Not the Journey — by Shep Hyken
  10. Get Ready for the Age of Acceleration — by Robert B. Tucker

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in March that continue to resonate with people:

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last three years:

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Power of the Trust Network

The Power of the Trust Network

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

The members of the Trust Network have worked together for a long time. And over that time together they’ve developed trust-based relationships that are more powerful than almost anything in the universe.

The Trust Network knows the work intimately and can do it in their sleep. They intuitively know the work should be started, the work should come next, the work should come after that, and the work should be scuttled.

In meetings, members of the Trust Network represent each other’s positions and protect each other’s interests. They’ve worked so long together that they know what each other think and can anticipate each other’s moves. The Trust Network communicates so quickly you’d think they’re telepathic. In truth, they’re only almost telepathic.

Members of the Trust Network don’t wear team jackets or advertise their membership status in any way. In fact, they never even call the network by name. You don’t know who they are, but they do. They hold regular meetings, though those meetings look like every other regular meeting. The Trust Network hides in plain sight.

When a project slowly emerges from the ether and blossoms into something special, that’s the workings of the Trust Network. When there’s no money to pay for an important purchase, yet the money mysteriously finds its way to the person who needs it, that’s the workings of the Trust Network. When a highly utilized piece of equipment suddenly comes available to support a seemingly unimportant project, that’s because the Trust Network knows it is truly an important project.

When a Vice President starts a pet project and tries to push it over the finish line, it’s the Trust Network that creates the resistance. When resources are slow to start the work, that’s the Trust Network. When emergency-type problems conveniently pull resources from the critical path, that’s the Trust Network. When the technical people stand up and say “this won’t work,” it’s the Trust Network that made it safe for them to say it.

When the formal org chart can’t get it done, the Trust Network engages to get it done. They simply come together to get the right people working on the right work, get the right analyses done, and invoke the right processes and tools right tools. The Trust Network doesn’t ask permission.

In an arm-wrestling match between the formal organizational network and the informal Trust Network, the formal network doesn’t stand a chance.

When the Trust Network sees organizational shenanigans, it turns the volume up to eleven. When the Trust Network sees people being mistreated, they get angry and swarm the troublemakers. And though it’s an invisible swarm, it’s a swarm that stings. And because its prime directive is to protect the hive, it’s a swarm that will not stop until the mistreatment stops. And because they know the work so well, they know how to sting in the most painful way.

If you want to be tapped for membership in the Trust Network, here’s what you should do. When there’s a big problem, run toward that problem like your hair is on fire and fix the problem. Don’t ask permission. Just fix it. When there’s a project that’s in trouble, donate resources and your time. Don’t ask. Just get the project back on the rails. When you see someone that’s suffering or having difficulty, help them. Don’t ask them if they want your help. Just help them. When you see someone that is about to make a big mistake, invite them to coffee, and help them make a better decision or take a better approach. Don’t ask, just help.

The Trust Network is always looking for new members and will reach out to you after you make a habit of demonstrating the right behavior.

Here are two more posts on the Trust Network — The Trust Network and Trust Network II.

Image credit: MarilynJane on Flickr

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

The Trust Network – Part Two

The Trust Network - Part Two

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

I stand by my statement that trust is the most important element in business (see The Trust Network.)

The Trust Network are the group of people who get the work done. They don’t do the work to get promoted, they just do the work because they like doing the work. They don’t take others’ credit (they’re not striving,) they just do the work. And they help each other do the work because, well, it’s the right thing to do.

Sometimes, they use their judgement to protect the company from bad ideas. But to be clear, they don’t protect the Status Quo. They use their good judgement to decide if a new idea has merit, and if it doesn’t, they try to shape it. And if they can’t shape it, they block it. Their judgement is good because their mutual trust allows them to talk openly and honestly and listen to each other. And through the process, they come to a decision and act on it.

But there’s another side to the Trust Network. They also bring new ideas to the company.

Trying new things is scary, but the Trust Network makes it safe. When someone has a good idea, the Network positively reinforces the goodness of the idea and recommends a small experiment. And when one installment of positivity doesn’t carry the day, the Trust Network comes together to create the additional positivity need to grow the idea into an experiment.

To make it safe, the Trust Network knows to keep the experiment small. If the small experiment doesn’t go as planned, they know there will be no negative consequences. And if the experiment’s results do attract attention, they dismiss the negativity of failure and talk about the positivity of learning. And if there is no money to run the experiment, they scare it up. They don’t stop until the experiment is completed.

But the real power of the Trust Network shows its hand after the successful experiment. The toughest part of innovation is the “now what” part, where successful experiments go to die. Since no one thought through what must happen to convert the successful experiment to a successful product, the follow-on actions are undefined and unbudgeted and the validated idea dies. But the Trust Network knows all this, so they help the experimenter define the “then what” activities before the experiment is run. That way, the resources are ready and waiting when the experiment is a success. The follow-on activities happen as planned.

The Trust Network always reminds each other that doing new things is difficult and that it’s okay that the outcome of the experiment is unknown. In fact, they go further and tell each other that the outcome of the experiment is unknowable. Regardless of the outcome of the experiment, the Trust Network is there for each other.

To start a Trust Network, find someone you trust and trust them. Support their new ideas, support their experiments and support the follow-on actions. If they’re afraid, tell them to be afraid and run the experiment. If they don’t have the resources to run the experiment, find the resources for them. And if they’re afraid they won’t get credit for all the success, tell them to trust you.

And to grow your Trust Network, find someone else you trust and trust them. And, repeat.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

The Trust Network

The Trust Network

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

Trust is the most important element in business. It’s not organizational authority, it’s not alignment, it’s not execution, it’s not best practices, it’s not competitive advantage and it’s not intellectual property. It’s trust.

Trust is more powerful than the organizational chart. Don’t believe me? Draw the org chart and pretend the person at the top has a stupid idea and they try to push down into the organization. When the top person pushes, the trust network responds to protect the company. After the unrealistic edict is given, the people on the receiving end (the trust network) get together in secret and hatch a plan to protect the organization from the ill-informed, but well-intentioned edict. Because we trust each other, we openly share our thoughts on why the idea is less than good. We are not afraid to be judged by members of trust network and, certainly, we don’t judge other members of the network. And once our truths are shared, the plan starts to take shape.

The trust network knows how things really work because we’ve worked shoulder-to-shoulder to deliver the most successful new products and technologies in company history. And through our lens of what worked, we figure out how to organize the resistance. And with the plan roughed out, we reach out to our trust network. We hold meetings with people deep in the organization who do the real work and tell them about the plan to protect the company. You don’t know who those people are, but we do.

If you don’t know about the trust network, it’s because you’re not part of it. But, trust me, it’s real. We meet right in front of you, but you don’t see us. We coordinate in plain sight, but we’re invisible. We figure out how things are going to go, but we don’t ask you or tell you. And you don’t know about us because we don’t trust you.

When the trust network is on your side, everything runs smoothly. The right resources flow to the work, the needed support somehow finds the project and, mysteriously, things get done faster than imagined. But when the trust network does not believe in you and your initiative, the wheels fall off. Things that should go smoothly, don’t, resources don’t flow to the work and, mysteriously, no one knows why.

You can push on the trust network, but you can’t break us. You can use your control mechanisms, but we will feign alignment until your attention wanes. And once you’re distracted, we’ll silently help the company do the right thing. We’re more powerful than you because you’re striving and we’re thriving. We can wait you out because we don’t need the next job. And, when the going gets tough, we’ll stick together because we trust each other.

Trust is powerful because it must be earned. With years of consistent behavior, where words match actions year-on-year, strong bonds are created. In that way, trust can’t be faked. You’ve either earned it or you haven’t. And when you’ve earned trust, people in the network take you seriously and put their faith in you. And when you haven’t earned trust, people in the network are not swayed by your words or your trendy initiative. We won’t tell you we don’t believe in you, but we won’t believe in you.

The trust network won’t invite you to join. The only way in is to behave in ways that make you trustworthy. When you think the company is making a mistake, say it. The trust network likes when your inner thoughts match your outer words. When someone needs help, help them. Don’t look for anything in return, just help them. When someone is about to make a mistake, step in and protect them from danger. Don’t do it for you, do it for them. And when someone makes a mistake, take the bullets. Again, do it for them.

After five or ten years of unselfish, trustworthy behavior, you’ll find yourself in meetings where the formal agenda isn’t really the agenda. In the meeting you’ll chart the company’s path without the need to ask permission. And you’ll be listened to even when your opinion is contrary to the majority. And you’ll be surrounded by people that care about you.

Even if you don’t believe in the trust network, it’s a good idea to behave in a trustworthy way. It’s good for you and the company. And when the trust network finally accepts you, you’ll be doubly happy you behaved in a trustworthy way.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

The Loyalty Gap

The Difference Between Repeat Customers and Loyal Customers

The Loyalty Gap

GUEST POST from Shep Hyken

In a recent Shepard Letter, I discussed the Trust Gap, which is the difference between an organization’s belief that their customers trust them and the percentage of customers who actually do. I’ve covered different gap concepts in the past, and it’s time to add yet another to the list, and that is the Loyalty Gap.

By the way, this is a perfect time to mention International Customer Loyalty Month, which happens every year in April. It is a time to focus some extra care and attention on your loyal customers. You can learn more at www.CustomerLoyaltyMonth.com.

So, back to the Loyalty Gap. This is the gap between the percentage of customers you think are loyal and customers who actually are loyal. If you’ve been following my work, you may remember that I preach there is a big difference between a repeat customer and a loyal customer. A customer that comes back again and again could be mistakenly labeled as a loyal customer. Before we can call someone a loyal customer, we must find out why they keep coming back and buying from us. And there are many reasons why customers might return that have nothing to do with being loyal. For example:

1. The Price Is Lowest: Customers who buy based on low price aren’t loyal to you. They are loyal to the price. The moment a competitor has a lower price, the customer disappears. And you thought they were loyal!

2. The Location Is More Convenient: Does the customer buy from you because you are closer than your competition? You don’t know if you don’t ask. As soon as a competitor moves into the area, if their location happens to be more convenient, the customer moves on. Again, you thought they were loyal!

3. The Customer Is Satisfied: This one is super important. There’s a big difference between a satisfied customer and a loyal customer. Satisfied customers are just … satisfied. The experience is good, but not great. It’s enough to get them to come back until they find another brand or organization that satisfies them just a bit more.

A loyal customer not only comes back but also spends more than a typical customer and evangelizes your brand by sharing word-of-mouth referrals. This is because there is an emotional connection. Maybe it’s the way the customer is treated. Or maybe there is an employee the customer loves to work with. Maybe it’s the confidence that’s created when a customer interacts with the brand. There are many reasons, but they all evoke an emotional connection.

So, what’s the Loyalty Gap in your business?

Do you understand your customers’ buying patterns?

Do you know why they come back?

In a perfect world, there shouldn’t be a gap. But that’s not reality. There will always be customers who don’t have the emotional connection needed to drive loyalty. There’s nothing you can do but keep trying. For the rest of your repeat customers, understand why they return, then keep delivering the experience that makes them want to return.

Image Credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Rise of the Chief Trust Officer

Rise of the Chief Trust Officer

GUEST POST from Shep Hyken

Do your customers trust you?

Are you sure?

According to PwC’s 2022 Consumer Intelligence Series Survey on Trust, 87% of executives think customers highly trust their companies, but only about 30% of customers do. That’s a 57% gap!

The PwC survey also found 71% of consumers say they’re unlikely to buy if a company loses their trust, and 71% of employees say they’re likely to leave if they lose trust. The lack of trust can result in huge problems.

Deloitte reports that of more than 260 C-suite executives surveyed, 61% claimed their organizations would work to improve trust with customers and employees. However, just 19% have a leader in the C-suite to oversee the effort, and less than 14% have a way to track trust. Ashley Reichheld, principal and trust leader at Deloitte Consulting LLP, says, “Building trust is among the most powerful ways brands can earn loyalty, drive differentiation and create competitive advantage.”

According to David Horsager, global authority on trust, “A lack of trust is your biggest expense in business.” His research has found that when a leader is untrusted, both employee and customer satisfaction decreases. Conversely, if a brand is trusted, revenue and employee retention increase.

The goal is to narrow the trust gap. Ideally, you want to eliminate the gap altogether. Here are ten ways to make that happen:

  1. Be Transparent – Being open and honest about your policies, delivery times, processes and more builds trust and confidence with your customers. You want them to know you and how you operate.
  2. Do What You Say You Will Do – Deliver on whatever you promise. There are many ways to lose a customer’s trust, but the fastest may be to break a promise. In short, a broken promise is a lie.
  3. Provide Excellent Customer Service – Our customer experience research found that 84% of consumers trust a company or brand more if it provides an excellent customer service experience.
  4. Protect Your Customer’s Privacy – Data protection is a hot topic. With all the data breaches, customers need to know you make a great effort to protect any information they share with you.
  5. Don’t Abuse Your Customer’s Data – This goes right along with protecting your customer’s privacy. If they are willing to give you information about themselves, even if it is just payment information and an email address, don’t abuse it by spamming the customer or selling the information to others.
  6. Be Reliable – A customer expects that what they buy from a company does what it is supposed to do. Products must be reliable and dependable. In addition, they also expect the company to stand behind what it sells with the right level of customer service.
  7. Fast Response – Customers have different tolerances for how long they will wait on hold, wait for a return phone call, an email response, etc. When it comes to customer service, fast means meeting a customer’s expectations.
  8. Be Accessible – Start with being easy to reach. Easy-to-find contact information on a website is important. Hours of operation, at least for customer service, must also meet your customer’s needs and expectations.
  9. Act on Customer Feedback – It’s one thing to gather feedback. It’s another to act on it. And once you act on the feedback, let the customers know they were heard. Always thank customers for their feedback, and follow up if it is appropriate to do so.

Create a Chief Trust Officer Role (or Something Similar) – This goes back to the finding from Deloitte at the beginning of this article. Just 19% of companies have a leader in the C-suite to oversee the effort of creating trust with customers.

Now that we understand more about the importance of trust, we might say those companies with a dedicated “trust officer” are a step ahead, taking advantage of a somewhat overlooked aspect of customer service. Seems like a great opportunity for any company to step up and focus on building trust—and the business that is sure to follow.

This article was originally published on Forbes.com.

Image Credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Psychological Safety: The Foundation of a Thriving and Innovative Culture

Psychological Safety: The Foundation of a Thriving and Innovative Culture

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world defined by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA), the old rules of leadership no longer apply. For too long, we have celebrated organizational cultures built on a foundation of intense competition, relentless efficiency, and a drive for individual brilliance. The implicit message was simple: success belongs to the most competent, the most certain, and the most productive. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I am here to argue that this approach is fundamentally flawed. The most resilient, innovative, and high-performing teams are not the ones with the most talent, but the ones with the most trust. Their secret weapon is a concept known as **psychological safety**, the shared belief that the team is a safe place for taking interpersonal risks.

Psychological safety is not about being “nice” or creating a “safe space” for mediocrity. It’s about building a foundation of trust where people feel safe enough to be vulnerable. It’s the feeling that you can admit a mistake, ask a “stupid” question, or challenge the status quo without fear of being ridiculed, shamed, or punished. This is a crucial distinction. When psychological safety is absent, our natural human instinct to self-preserve kicks in. We self-censor, we withhold critical information, and we stick to the known, a recipe for stagnation and eventual failure. But when it’s present, something magical happens: individual intelligence transforms into collective genius. Teams learn faster, innovate more freely, and adapt to change with a level of agility that is impossible in a fear-based environment.

The Business Case for Safety: Why Trust is Your Greatest Asset

The argument for psychological safety isn’t just a philosophical one; it’s a strategic imperative with a clear business case. Research from a wide range of fields—from organizational psychology to neuroscience—confirms its power. In a landmark study, Google’s “Project Aristotle,” researchers set out to find the secret to the company’s most effective teams. They analyzed everything from individual skills to personality types, but the data revealed a surprising truth: the single most important factor was not talent, but psychological safety. This finding cemented psychological safety as the ultimate foundation for high-performance.

When psychological safety is high, a team can:

  • Embrace a Learning Mindset: Mistakes are seen as data points for learning, not failures to be punished. This enables rapid iteration and a “fail-fast” culture.
  • Unlock Creativity and Innovation: When people are free from the fear of looking foolish, they are more likely to share unconventional ideas, leading to genuine breakthroughs.
  • Improve Problem-Solving: Team members are more likely to speak up about potential problems, raise red flags, and engage in constructive conflict, allowing the team to address issues before they become crises.
  • Increase Employee Engagement and Retention: People want to work in an environment where they feel valued, respected, and safe. A culture of psychological safety fosters deep loyalty and reduces turnover.

“Talent gets you on the field, but psychological safety is what allows you to win the game.”


Case Study 1: Pixar’s “Braintrust” – A Masterclass in Candor and Trust

The Challenge:

In the high-stakes world of animated filmmaking, a single creative misstep can lead to a disastrous flop. For Pixar, the challenge was to create a mechanism for frank, honest, and even brutal feedback on films in progress without crushing the creative spirit of the director and their team. A typical corporate review process would be too political and hierarchical for the level of candid feedback needed.

The Psychological Safety Solution:

Pixar’s solution was the **Braintrust**, an exclusive group of the company’s most accomplished directors and storytellers. This wasn’t a formal committee; it was a culture built on psychological safety. The core rules of the Braintrust are simple yet powerful: a director is never obligated to act on the feedback, and the group’s purpose is to help the film succeed, not to assert power. The feedback is always on the work, never the person. This deep, shared belief that everyone is there to help and that no one is judging personal worth allowed for a level of open, candid criticism that is almost unheard of in other creative industries. Directors could present their half-finished, deeply flawed films and receive honest input without fear of professional harm.

The Result:

The Braintrust is a key reason for Pixar’s long-term, unprecedented creative success. It is a living testament to the power of psychological safety. By building an environment where candor and vulnerability were not just tolerated but celebrated, Pixar created a collective intelligence that consistently elevated the quality of every film. They proved that honest feedback, delivered with a foundation of trust, is the ultimate driver of creative excellence.


Case Study 2: The Boeing 737 MAX Crisis – The Catastrophic Cost of Silence

The Challenge:

In the years leading up to the two fatal crashes of the Boeing 737 MAX, the company was under immense pressure to compete with Airbus and deliver a new, fuel-efficient aircraft on an aggressive timeline. Internally, a culture of cost-cutting and a rigid, top-down hierarchy created a fear-based environment. Engineers and employees were aware of potential issues with the new flight control software (MCAS), but they felt unable to raise their concerns.

The Psychological Safety Failure:

In this culture of fear, with an emphasis on meeting deadlines at all costs, employees chose silence over speaking up. A damning report by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee found that a lack of psychological safety prevented whistleblowers from coming forward. Engineers felt that raising safety concerns would not only fall on deaf ears but could also lead to retaliation or professional damage. Instead of a collaborative problem-solving approach, the culture fostered a dangerous “don’t ask, don’t tell” mentality. The very people who could have prevented the tragedy were silenced by an environment that prioritized speed and cost over human lives.

The Result:

The absence of psychological safety at Boeing led to one of the most devastating corporate crises in modern history. The two fatal crashes killed 346 people and resulted in a massive financial and reputational blow. The case of the 737 MAX serves as a powerful cautionary tale, demonstrating that a lack of psychological safety is not just a cultural problem; it is a critical strategic risk with potentially catastrophic consequences. It’s a stark reminder that when people are afraid to speak up, the cost can be measured in both lives and livelihoods.


Conclusion: The Ultimate Foundation for Innovation

Psychological safety is not a “nice-to-have” or a buzzword from a corporate retreat. It is the ultimate foundation for building teams that are resilient, adaptable, and ready for anything. It is the soil in which innovation grows, where creativity flourishes, and where people are empowered to be their best, most authentic selves. As leaders, our most important job is not to have all the answers, but to create the environment where our teams feel safe enough to find them together.

In a world of constant change, the ability to learn and evolve is paramount. And learning only happens when we are willing to admit what we don’t know, to experiment without fear of failure, and to speak our minds without fear of judgment. The future belongs to the psychologically safe. Let’s start building it, one conversation and one act of vulnerability at a time.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Striking the Right Balance Between Data Privacy and Innovation

Striking the Right Balance Between Data Privacy and Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

From my vantage point here in the United States, at the crossroads of technological advancement and community values, I often reflect on one of the most pressing challenges of our digital age: how do we foster groundbreaking innovation without compromising fundamental data privacy rights? There’s a pervasive myth that privacy and innovation are inherently at odds – that one must be sacrificed for the other. As a human-centered change leader, I firmly believe this is a false dichotomy. The true frontier of innovation lies in designing solutions where data privacy is not an afterthought or a regulatory burden, but a foundational element that actually enables deeper trust and more meaningful progress.

Data is the fuel of modern innovation. From AI and personalized experiences to healthcare advancements and smart cities, our ability to collect, analyze, and leverage data drives much of the progress we see. However, this power comes with a profound responsibility. The increasing frequency of data breaches, the rise of opaque algorithms, and growing concerns about surveillance have eroded public trust. When users fear their data is being misused, they become reluctant to engage with new technologies, stifling the very innovation we seek to foster. Therefore, balancing the immense potential of data-driven innovation with robust data privacy is not just an ethical imperative; it is a strategic necessity for long-term success and societal acceptance.

Striking this delicate balance requires a human-centered approach to data management – one that prioritizes transparency, control, and respect for individual rights. It’s about moving from a mindset of “collect everything” to “collect what’s necessary, protect it fiercely, and use it wisely.” Key principles for achieving this balance include:

  • Privacy by Design: Integrating privacy protections into the design and architecture of systems from the very beginning, rather than adding them as an afterthought.
  • Transparency and Clear Communication: Being explicit and easy to understand about what data is being collected, why it’s being collected, and how it will be used. Empowering users with accessible information.
  • User Control and Consent: Giving individuals meaningful control over their data, including the ability to grant, revoke, or modify consent for data usage.
  • Data Minimization: Collecting only the data that is absolutely necessary for the intended purpose and retaining it only for as long as required.
  • Security by Default: Implementing robust security measures to protect data from unauthorized access, breaches, and misuse, making security the default, not an option.
  • Ethical Data Use Policies: Developing clear internal policies and training that ensure data is used responsibly, ethically, and in alignment with societal values.

Case Study 1: Apple’s Stance on User Privacy as a Differentiator

The Challenge: Distinguishing in a Data-Hungry Tech Landscape

In an industry where many tech companies rely heavily on collecting and monetizing user data, Apple recognized an opportunity to differentiate itself. As concerns about data privacy grew among consumers, Apple faced the challenge of maintaining its innovative edge while explicitly positioning itself as a champion of user privacy, often in contrast to its competitors.

Privacy as Innovation:

Apple made data privacy a core tenet of its brand and product strategy. They implemented “Privacy by Design” across their ecosystem, with features like on-device processing to minimize data sent to the cloud, App Tracking Transparency (ATT) which requires apps to ask for user permission before tracking them across other apps and websites, and strong encryption by default. Their messaging consistently emphasizes that user data is not their business model. This commitment required significant engineering effort and, at times, led to friction with other companies whose business models relied on extensive data collection. However, Apple framed these privacy features not as limitations, but as innovations that provide users with greater control and peace of mind.

The Impact:

Apple’s strong stance on privacy has resonated deeply with a growing segment of consumers who are increasingly concerned about their digital footprint. This approach has strengthened brand loyalty, contributed to strong sales, and positioned Apple as a trusted leader in a sometimes-skeptical industry. It demonstrates that prioritizing data privacy can be a powerful competitive advantage and a driver of innovation, rather than a hindrance. Apple’s success proves that safeguarding user data can build profound trust, which in turn fuels long-term engagement and business growth.

Key Insight: Embedding data privacy as a core value and design principle can become a powerful brand differentiator, building customer trust and driving sustained innovation in a data-conscious world.

Case Study 2: The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Its Global Impact

The Challenge: Harmonizing Data Protection Across Borders and Empowering Citizens

Prior to 2018, data protection laws across Europe were fragmented, creating complexity for businesses and inconsistent protection for citizens. The European Union faced the challenge of creating a unified, comprehensive framework that would empower individuals with greater control over their personal data in an increasingly digital and globalized economy.

Regulation as a Driver for Ethical Innovation:

The GDPR, implemented in May 2018, introduced stringent requirements for data collection, storage, and processing, focusing on principles like consent, transparency, and accountability. It gave individuals rights such as the right to access their data, the right to rectification, and the “right to be forgotten.” While initially perceived by many businesses as a significant compliance burden, GDPR effectively forced organizations to adopt “Privacy by Design” principles and to fundamentally rethink how they handle personal data. It compelled innovators to build privacy into their products and services from the ground up, rather than treating it as a bolt-on. This regulation created a new standard for data privacy, influencing legislation and corporate practices globally.

The Impact:

Beyond compliance, GDPR has spurred a wave of innovation focused on privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) and privacy-first business models. Companies have developed new ways to process data anonymously, conduct secure multi-party computation, and provide transparent consent mechanisms. While challenges remain, GDPR has arguably fostered a more ethical approach to data-driven innovation, pushing companies to be more thoughtful and respectful of user data. It demonstrates that robust regulation, rather than stifling innovation, can serve as a catalyst for responsible and human-centered technological progress, ultimately rebuilding trust with consumers on a global scale.

Key Insight: Strong data privacy regulations, while initially challenging, can act as a catalyst for ethical innovation, driving the development of privacy-enhancing technologies and fostering greater trust between consumers and businesses globally.

Building a Trustworthy Future through Balanced Innovation

Throughout the world, the conversation around data privacy and innovation is far from over. As we continue to push the boundaries of what technology can achieve, we must remain steadfast in our commitment to human values. By embracing principles like Privacy by Design, championing transparency, and empowering user control, we can create a future where innovation flourishes not at the expense of privacy, but because of it. Striking this balance is not just about avoiding regulatory fines; it’s about building a more ethical, trustworthy, and ultimately more sustainable digital future for all.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Empowering Employees Through Autonomy and Trust

The Flexible Workforce

Empowering Employees Through Autonomy and Trust

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

From my perspective here in the United States, where the blend of thriving tech companies and a strong sense of community highlights the importance of individual well-being, I’ve observed a fundamental shift in what employees expect from their work. The traditional model of rigid schedules and top-down control is increasingly outdated. Today’s workforce, driven by a desire for purpose, balance, and control over their lives, thrives in environments that embrace flexibility, autonomy, and trust. Building a flexible workforce is not just a perk; it’s a strategic imperative for attracting and retaining top talent, fostering innovation, and creating a resilient organization in an era of constant change.

The concept of a flexible workforce goes beyond just remote work. It encompasses a range of arrangements that empower employees to manage their time, their work location, and even the way they approach their tasks. This can include flexible start and end times, compressed workweeks, job sharing, and the freedom to choose where they work best. The underlying principle is a shift from managing inputs (hours worked, physical presence) to focusing on outputs (results achieved). This requires a significant leap of faith from traditional management, a move away from surveillance and towards a culture built on mutual trust and accountability. When employees are given autonomy, they are more likely to be engaged, motivated, and creative, leading to higher productivity and a stronger sense of ownership over their work.

Creating a truly flexible workforce requires a human-centered approach that considers the diverse needs and preferences of your employees. It’s not about a one-size-fits-all policy, but about creating a framework that allows for individual choices within clear guidelines. Key elements for building this empowering environment include:

  • Clear Communication and Expectations: Establishing clear goals, deadlines, and performance metrics is crucial when employees have more control over their work. Regular and transparent communication is essential to ensure everyone is aligned.
  • Investing in Technology and Infrastructure: Providing employees with the tools and resources they need to work effectively from any location is a fundamental requirement for successful flexibility.
  • Fostering a Culture of Trust and Accountability: Shifting the focus from monitoring time to evaluating results requires a strong foundation of trust. Employees need to feel empowered to make decisions and be accountable for their outcomes.
  • Providing Training and Support for Remote Teams: Ensuring that remote employees feel connected and have the support they need to collaborate effectively and maintain a strong sense of belonging.
  • Regularly Evaluating and Adapting Policies: Flexibility is not static. Regularly seeking feedback from employees and adapting policies to meet evolving needs is essential for long-term success.

Case Study 1: Netflix’s Culture of Freedom and Responsibility

The Challenge: Scaling Innovation and Maintaining High Performance in a Rapidly Growing Company

Netflix, the streaming entertainment giant, has built a renowned culture based on “Freedom & Responsibility.” This philosophy permeates every aspect of their operations, including how they approach work and empower their employees. In a highly competitive and rapidly evolving industry, Netflix recognized that attracting and retaining top talent, and fostering a culture of innovation, required a departure from traditional hierarchical structures.

Embracing Autonomy and Trust:

Netflix provides its employees with significant autonomy in how they do their work. They have very few formal policies around things like vacation time or work hours. Instead, they emphasize results and trust their employees to manage their time effectively to achieve those results. The company’s “keeper test” – the question managers should ask themselves about whether they would fight hard to keep an employee – reinforces a focus on high performance and mutual respect. This high degree of freedom is coupled with a high degree of responsibility; employees are expected to be self-disciplined, proactive, and deliver exceptional work. The transparency around company goals and performance metrics ensures everyone understands the expectations and the impact of their contributions.

The Impact:

Netflix’s culture of freedom and responsibility has been instrumental in its success. It has enabled them to attract and retain some of the best talent in the world, foster a highly innovative environment, and adapt quickly to the ever-changing landscape of the entertainment industry. Employees feel empowered and trusted, leading to high levels of engagement and commitment. While this model requires a mature and high-performing workforce, it demonstrates the powerful results that can be achieved when an organization truly empowers its employees through autonomy and trust.

Key Insight: A culture built on freedom and responsibility, where employees are trusted to manage their work and are held accountable for results, can drive innovation and attract top talent in highly competitive industries.

Case Study 2: GitLab’s Distributed-First Approach to Work

The Challenge: Building a Global Company Without Physical Offices

GitLab, a company that provides a web-based DevOps platform, has embraced a fully distributed work model from its inception. With employees spread across over 65 countries, GitLab has intentionally designed its entire operating model around flexibility, autonomy, and asynchronous communication. For GitLab, flexibility isn’t just a perk; it’s the foundation of how they build and run their global business.

Empowering a Remote Workforce:

GitLab has developed comprehensive documentation and clear processes to enable effective collaboration across time zones and locations. They heavily rely on asynchronous communication tools and emphasize written communication to ensure clarity and transparency. Employees have significant autonomy over their work schedules and locations, as long as they deliver results. GitLab fosters a strong sense of trust by empowering individuals to make decisions and take ownership of their work. They also invest in regular virtual social events and encourage in-person meetups to build connections and maintain a strong company culture despite the lack of physical offices. Their “bias for asynchronous communication” empowers employees to work when and where they are most productive, maximizing individual autonomy while ensuring team alignment.

The Impact:

GitLab’s distributed-first approach has allowed them to tap into a global talent pool, build a diverse and inclusive workforce, and operate with significant efficiency. Their success demonstrates that a fully flexible work model, built on clear processes, trust, and effective communication, can not only work but can be a significant competitive advantage. By empowering employees with complete autonomy over their work environment, GitLab has fostered a highly engaged and productive workforce that is well-equipped to navigate the complexities of a global, distributed company.

Key Insight: A fully distributed work model, built on trust, clear communication, and a focus on asynchronous collaboration, can enable organizations to access global talent, enhance efficiency, and empower employees with maximum autonomy.

The Future is Flexible

Across the globe, the future of work is undoubtedly flexible. Organizations that recognize the power of autonomy and trust, and actively work to empower their employees with greater control over their work lives, will be the ones that attract the best talent, foster the most innovation, and build the most resilient and engaged workforces. The shift from a culture of control to a culture of trust requires a fundamental change in mindset, but the rewards—in terms of employee well-being, productivity, and organizational success—are well worth the journey. Embracing the flexible workforce is not just about adapting to the present; it’s about building a better future for work.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.