Category Archives: Psychology

Driving Innovation Through Empathy, Leadership and Understanding

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the rapidly evolving world of business, innovation stands as a critical driver for success. While processes, structures, and technologies play substantial roles, the human element—particularly empathy—holds profound potential. Empathy allows leaders to deeply understand and genuinely connect with their teams and customers, fostering an environment where innovation thrives. This article explores the intricate relationship between empathy and leadership, anchored by compelling case studies that illustrate transformative outcomes when empathy is prioritized.

Case Study 1: The LEGO Group

LEGO, the beloved toy company, experienced significant challenges in the early 2000s. The company was nearing bankruptcy due to a failure to adapt to the changing interests of its core audience—children. The leadership team at LEGO realized a need to step back and adopt a fresh perspective grounded in empathy.

The turnaround strategy, famously termed “LEGO’s Business Transformation,” required the leadership to immerse themselves in the world of their customers—children. By spending time observing and interacting with children during play sessions, LEGO’s leaders understood the emotional and creative needs of their audience. This led to innovations like the immensely popular LEGO Friends series, which was designed based on detailed feedback from young girls who were previously underserved by traditionally boy-oriented LEGO products.

The result was not only an incredible resurgence in profitability but also an innovation culture that prioritizes deep customer connection and iterative feedback—a testament to the power of empathy-driven leadership.

Case Study 2: Microsoft’s Cultural Transformation

When Satya Nadella became the CEO of Microsoft in 2014, the company was seen as a bureaucratic giant struggling to compete with more nimble tech innovators. Nadella’s leadership focused heavily on empathy, both internally across Microsoft’s vast workforce and externally toward customers.

Internally, Nadella encouraged a cultural shift from a “know-it-all” to a “learn-it-all” philosophy. He challenged teams to use empathy to transform customer engagement strategies and product development processes. A concrete example is the development of features for people with disabilities, inspired by Nadella’s personal experiences as a father of a child with special needs.

This empathy-first approach led to breakthrough innovations such as Seeing AI, an app that narrates the world for the visually impaired, exemplifying how deep understanding and leadership empathy could drive product innovation while simultaneously enhancing Microsoft’s brand value and market relevance.

Conclusion

Empathy enables leaders to connect deeply with their teams and customers, providing a compass that guides innovative practices. The stories of LEGO and Microsoft underscore the profound impact that empathy can have when it shapes leadership strategies. As businesses grapple with complex challenges, those that integrate empathy into the very fabric of their leadership are not only poised to innovate but to do so in a manner that genuinely resonates with human needs.

In embracing empathy, leaders unlock the key to sustainable innovation, transforming their organizations into environments where understanding, creativity, and impact coexist harmoniously.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Why Most Corporate Mindset Programs Are a Waste of Time

1 Reply

What to Focus on Instead

Why Most Corporate Mindset Programs Are a Waste of Time

GUEST POST from Alain Thys

You may know that I’m hunting for a Transformation Algorithm

Its goal is to help us move beyond the >70% failure rate of corporate transformations and create transformative experiences for employees, customers and society. Ambitious? Moi?

To get there, I’m walking around the problem.

Looking at it from all perspectives (Japan style). So without claiming expertise in any domain, I’m blending systems thinking with neuroscience, behavioral psychology, philosophy and my background in experience design. There’s even a little math (I couldn’t resist .

It’s a work in progress, but I’m getting there.

Meanwhile, here are some more thoughts as I put together the puzzle. The article starts a bit gloomy, but it ends more upbeat… I promise.

It’s all work in progress in which I’m still improving both language and content.
So don’t hold back on comments, compliments or corrections.

These days, every company wants to see a ‘mindset change’.

People need to be customer-centric. Digital. Agile. Sustainable. Innovative. More in love with the color blue. After all, the consultants, executive trainers and software vendors say this is the future. Not to mention Mark’s metaverse:

To make this happen, organizations unleash a barrage of initiatives

They do enthusiastic presentations. Introduce new KPIs and dashboards. Launch internal communication programs and training academies. Create new journey maps. Introduce AI. Get some fancy software.

Some even call me (obviously the smartest ones ).

At first, the signs are good.

After all, with enough pressure, you can get water to go uphill. Also, any decent third-party consultant or vendor will make sure that employees leave those workshops with a smile and some quick wins. Especially those that show progress in pretty graphs and numbers.

But then – one by one – the ‘old ways’ assert themselves

They raise dozens of practical, budgetary, emotional and IT concerns which are all valid and require the change program to be calibrated. After all, leaders need to be pragmatic. These thousand slight cuts erode the big transformative vision and expectations get lowered. Things might even become as they were.

#endofmindsetchange?

What if we were aiming at the wrong target?

If you look up mindset in a dictionary, you find it is a mental attitude or inclination. The combined set of assumptions, methods and notions with which each of us approaches problems and the world at large (our perspective). Something rooted in the way we view the world and our perception of reality (our paradigm).

This means that every mindset change is in fact a change in perspective or paradigm.

Let me illustrate with a consumer electronics company that wanted to go from product- to customer-centric value propositions. Digging deep, we found that from the engineer’s perspective, the requested mindset change meant letting go of their long held belief that as the world’s best technical experts they knew how to make the best products on the planet (and had the awards and accolades to prove it).

Instead, they had to embrace that the customer knew better what great looked like and their opinion didn’t matter as much as they thought.

If you’ve worked all your life to become that smart and esteemed technical expert, this is an existential pill to swallow. Especially if the only rationale from the top is that “our Net Promoter Score should improve”.

These shifts in perspective lurk in any transformation

Being agile means seeing that we live in a chaotic world where we can never really be sure of our best next step. True sustainability means accepting that there are limits to growth, also ours. Going digital means letting go of activities we have long considered to be uniquely human (ours?). Innovation requires unlearning the orthodoxies and beliefs we may have held since childhood. And so on.

For some people, these steps may be easy. But for most, they can challenge the core of who they are (even if they may not admit this to themselves).

Ignoring this deeper reality can doom your transformation from the start.

If the new KPIs, processes, systems and incentives you introduce do not match the worldview of the people you target, they will reject them. Sometimes they rebel. Sometimes they stand in the way without realizing it themselves. Either way, your culture will eat your strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

So what to do instead?

Frustration

If you want mindset change, focus on the paradigm shift first.

Before you expect people to approach problems differently (mindset), work on the way they perceive these problems and their context. Clearly describe the required paradigm shift in a FROM… TO… statement and make it as compelling as possible. All while acknowledging the uncomfortable bits head on.

Then, give people opportunities to embrace this new narrative through experiential programs (remember: the old brain doesn’t do PowerPoint).

Once they see the world with fresh eyes, the mindset and changes will follow.

Or as my ultimate change guru Antoine de Saint-Exupéry used to say: “if you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.”

But always remember that your perception as a leader is flawed too.

When you say: ‘I want a mindset change’, you are actually saying: ‘I want you to see the world as I do’.

This is often a big ask, as chances are you live in a world that is more affluent, more educated and more informed (I won’t mention diversity … oops, I did). You probably have a different education, live in a different social media bubble and even shop in different stores. You may even have the freedom to make your own decisions.

Seeing life your way, may not be as easy for someone who has grown up, works and lives in a different context (no value judgment here, just observation).

Inversely, unless you’ve done their jobs and lived their lives, you will have difficulties to imagine the world through the eyes of your people. No matter how you try.

So before you talk about mindset change.

Understand and start from your people’s perspective and then expand it in the direction you propose. And if the gap between the two is too big, consider adapting your strategy.

Perhaps your world view and sense of possibility need an update too.

Image Credits: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Re-Thinking for a New Era

3 Replies

Re-Thinking for a New Era

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

In our last blog, we proposed, rather than living in a world where everyone hates to fail, why not adopt a rethink, respond, regroup, thrive pattern, and experience failure as an opportunity for change, unlearning, and re-thinking? Adopting this approach supports your human-centricity and enables you to become future-fit through developing your set of 21st-century superpowers in the face of the acute disruption of COVID-19. This is reinforced by Adam Grant, in his book “Think Again” (the power of not knowing what you don’t know) where he states that we are living in a time vital for re-thinking to help us become adaptive and agile and develop our future fitness to thrive in a disruptive, uncertain world.

Critical Art of Re-Thinking

The critical art of re-thinking involves being actively open-minded, hearted, and willed:

To learning, and possibly re-learning how to effectively question your own beliefs, mindsets, assumptions, opinions, and habits;
Through connection, association, detachment, and discernment to these qualities in other people’s minds and hearts;
And to then put our “mental pliability” and “emotional agility” to the test by creating the time and space for re-thinking with a new “set of goggles” and revising our views based on what we learn.

This potentially benefits everyone because it allows us to upgrade and update our points of view and expand our understanding of the world, we are all living in today and build our future fitness.

It also positions us for change innovation and excellence in the way we transform our approach to work and share our wisdom in life.

Making time and space for re-thinking

The vital role of unlearning

Embracing human-centricity and a future-fit focus involves unlearning and letting go of many of our old beliefs, mindsets, assumptions, opinions, and habits embedded in our habitual feeling and thinking systems.

Being able to discern which of these are now incomplete, ineffective, and irrelevant as we adapt, and serve people, teams, and organisations to survive, grow, and develop future fitness to thrive in the post-Covid-19 world.

Unlearning is not about forgetting, it’s about paying deep attention and developing the awareness to see, and safely and courageously step outside of our old thinking systems, mental models, biases, and paradigms.

Being intellectually humble

Being intellectually humble involves “knowing what we don’t know” and being inquisitive and curious enough to explore new discoveries, and pay deep attention, and be consciously aware of the rich and valuable rewards to be found in the “unknown”.

Most of us are unconsciously motivated to move away from change and learning as a result of “blindness” to our learning or survival anxieties (Schein), and the need to cover up our “learning incompetence” (when people pretend to know things they don’t).

The willingness to be actively open-minded, hearted, and willed and embrace intellectual humility helps us see things clearly and moves us towards overcoming our blind spots and weaknesses.

Re-Thinking in a Disconnected and Disruptive Era

Thinking, fast and slow

Daniel Kahneman, in his book “Thinking Fast and Slow,” describes the “machinery of … thought,” dividing the brain into two agents, called System 1 and System 2, which “respectively produce fast and slow thinking.”

For our purposes, at ImagineNation™, in our group, leadership, and team coaching programs, these can also be thought of as intuitive and deliberate thought.

Introducing System 3 thinking

My colleague, Peter Webb (www.peterjwebb.com), has added to this work by researching and validating a System 3 which he describes as considerative, which is complementary to our approach to thinking differently at ImagineNation™.

System 1 operates automatically and quickly, with little or no effort and no sense of voluntary control. it is intuitive, quick, and emotional.
System 2 allocates attention to the effortful mental activities that demand it, including complex computations. The operations of System 2 are often associated with the subjective experience of agency, choice, and concentration. It is deliberative in that is rational and calculated.
System 3 thinking is more considerative, thoughtful, and consequential in that it enables you to focus on what really matters, discern what makes common sense, make small decisions and take small actions to find out what works best, be compassionate, regulate your emotions and develop a tolerance for divergent values.

You can explore more these three thinking systems, and initiate your own re-thinking process by contacting Peter at https://www.peterjwebb.com/

Initiating Your Re-Thinking Strategy

Developing a habit of reflective practices

Our innovation coaching, leading, and teaming learning programs involve developing a regular reflective practice –which according to Turner, Lucas & Whitaker, in the learning and coaching context is:

“the ability to step away from your work and identity patterns, habits, strengths, and limitations in your work, and/within the system you work in.”

Pause-retreat-reflect cycle to catalyse re-thinking

At ImagineNation™ to initiate the re-thinking process, through partnering with clients to be actively open-minded, hearted, and willed through our “pause-retreat-reflect-reboot” cycle.

To support the development of the new habit, we include:

A personal reflection practice involves initiating or continuing a mindfulness activity.
A set of regular reflection activities which include different sets of reflective and generative questions.
Journaling processes, incorporating the CCS Cards for play and critical reflection for our clients to experiment with.

This involves practicing a set of regular retreat and reflection activities involving safely and intentionally enabling people to deeply listen and question and paradoxically dance across the 3 thinking systems simultaneously.

Enhancing your own and your team’s capability to do this will transform your approach to work, harness people’s collective intelligence to share their wisdom in life with the world, and develop future fitness to master challenges and solve problems as they arise.

Shifting to re-thinking

Interrupt their habitual “do-feel-think” cycles (doing stuff that may not deliver the results you want, feeling the awful emotions that result from mistakes, imperfection, and failure, then thinking what to do about it).
Create “stop signals” to affect a pause, long enough to stop doing stuff and become present to the range of emotions to calm down their nervous system.
Connect, associate with and acknowledge how they might be feeling at this unique and specific moment in time.
Pay deep attention to observing their operating thought patterns, with detachment and discernment.
Intentionally choose a desired future state or outcome.
Consider the impact of their feelings and thoughts on the results they are getting.
Deliberate, consider and quickly choose more resourceful visceral and feeling states that compels (pulls) and mobilise them to achieve the desired future state or outcome.
Finally, deliberate, consider and quickly choose more resourceful thought and feeling patterns to choose the most intelligent actions to take to achieve the desired future state or outcome.

The result is usually the development of a re-thinking process that has evolved from “do-think-feel” to “feel-think-do” (connecting to a desirable outcome, feeling present, thinking about the most intelligent thoughts and actions to embody and enact to get there, saving both time and money on wasted activities, avoiding mistakes and failures, to get to their desired future state.)

A Final Word on the Benefits of Re-Thinking

Taking just a moment to pause-retreat-reflect catalyses our rethink, respond, regroup, thrive pattern and creates opportunities for change, unlearning, and re-thinking. It is also a vital ingredient towards developing peoples’ future fitness.

Enabling us to appreciate the value of tuning into ourselves and into others, to leverage our emotional and mental muscles, towards actively creating the space for evoking and provoking different options and creative choices. Which better enable and empower us to re-think about being, thinking, and acting differently in a new age, impacted by the technologies created by accelerated digitization.

We can then perform at higher levels, achieve our desired outcomes and goals, interact, lead and team more effectively and develop functional and highly valued collaborative relationships with others, as well as with stakeholders and customers.

To leverage the current turning point, and develop our 21st-century superpowers, to co-create a more equitable, resilient, sustainable, human-centric, and future-fit environment, within an ever-changing landscape.

Join Our Next Free “Making Innovation a Habit” Masterclass to Re-Engage 2022!

Our 90-minute masterclass and creative conversation will help you develop your post-Covid-19 re-engagement strategy. It’s on Thursday, 10th February at 6.30 pm Sydney and Melbourne, 8.30 pm Auckland, 3.30 pm Singapore, 11.30 am Abu Dhabi and 8.30 am Berlin. Find out more.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Not Everyone Can Transform Themselves

1 Reply

Not Everyone Can Transform Themselves

Here’s What Makes the Difference

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

The conservative columnist John Podhoretz recently took to the New York Post to denounce the plotline of Disney’s new miniseries The Falcon and the Winter Soldier. In particular, he took umbrage with a subplot that invoked the Tuskegee experiments and other historical warts in a manner that he termed “didactic anti-Americanism.”

His point struck a chord with me because, in my many years living overseas, I always found that people in other countries were more than aware of America’s failures such as slavery, Jim Crow, foreign policy misadventures and so on. What they admire is our ability to take a hard look at ourselves and change course.

It also reminded me of something I’ve noticed in my work helping organizations transform themselves. Some are willing to take a hard look at themselves and make tough changes, while others are addicted to happy talk and try to wish problems away. Make no mistake. You can’t tackle the future without looking with clear eyes at how the present came into being.

A Pregnant Postcard

The genesis of shareholder capitalism and our modern outlook on how things are supposed to work can, in some sense, be traced back to Paris in 1900. It was there and then that an obscure graduate student named Louis Bachelier presented his thesis on speculation to a panel of judges including the great Henri Poincaré. It described the fluctuation of market prices as a random walk, a revolutionary, albeit unappreciated, idea at the time.

Unfortunately for Bachelier, his paper went mostly unnoticed and he vanished into obscurity. Then, in 1954, he was rediscovered by a statistician named Jimmie Savage, who sent a postcard to his friend, the eminent economist Paul Samuelson, asking “ever hear of this guy?” Samuelson hadn’t, but was intrigued.

In particular, Bachelier’s assertion that “the mathematical expectation of the speculator is zero,” was intriguing because it implied that market prices were essentially governed by bell curves that are, in many respects, predictable. If it were true, then markets could be tamed through statistical modeling and the economy could be managed much more effectively.

Samuelson, who was pioneering the field of mathematical finance at the time, thought the paper was brilliant and began to actively promote it. Later, Eugene Fama would build Bachelier’s initial work into a full-blown Efficient Market Hypothesis. It would unleash a flurry of new research into financial modeling and more than a few Nobel Prizes.

A Refusal to Reckon

By the 1960s, the revolution in mathematical finance began to gain steam. Much like had happened in physics earlier in the century, a constellation of new discoveries such as efficient portfolios, the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and, later, the Black-Scholes model for options pricing created a “standard model” for thinking about economics and finance.

As the things gathered steam, Samuelson’s colleague at MIT, Paul Cootner, compiled the most promising papers in a 500-page tome, The Random Character of Stock Market Prices, which became an instant classic. The book would become a basic reference for the new industries of financial engineering and risk management that were just beginning to emerge at the time.

However, early signs of trouble were being ignored. Included in Cootner’s book was a paper by Benoit Mandelbrot that warned that there was something seriously wrong afoot. He showed, with very clear reasoning and analysis, that actual market data displayed far more volatility than was being predicted. In essence, he was pointing out that Samuelson and his friends were vastly underestimating risk in the financial system.

In a response, Cootner wrote that Mandelbrot forced economists “to face up in a substantive way to those uncomfortable empirical observations that there is little doubt most of us have had to sweep under the carpet until now.” He then added, “but surely before consigning centuries of work to the ash pile, we should like to have some assurance that all of our work is truly useless.”

Think about that for a second. Another term for “empirical observations” is “facts in evidence,” and Cootner was admitting that these were being ignored! The train was leaving the station and everybody had to either get on or get left behind.

The Road to Shareholder Value

As financial engineering transformed Wall Street from a clubby, quiet industry to one in which dashing swashbucklers in power ties and red suspenders became “barbarians at the gate,” pressure began to build on managers. The new risk management products lowered the perceived cost of money and ushered in a new era of leveraged buyouts.

A new breed of “corporate raiders” could now get control of companies with very little capital and demand that performance—and “performance” meant stock performance— improve. They believed that society’s interest was best determined by market forces and unabashedly pursued investment returns above all else. As Wall Street anti-hero Gordon Gekko put it, the overall sentiment was that “greed is good.”

Managers were put on notice and a flood of new theories from business school professors and management consultants poured in. Harvard’s Michael Porter explained how actively managing value chains could lead to sustainable competitive advantage. New quantitative methods, such as six sigma, promised to transform management into, essentially, an engineering problem.

Today, the results are in and they are abysmal. In 2008 a systemic underestimation of risk—of exactly the type Mandelbrot warned us of—caused a financial meltdown. We are now in the midst of a second productivity paradox in which technological advance does little to improve our well-being. Income inequality, racial strife and mental health are at historic levels.

Since 1970, we have undergone three revolutions—financial, managerial and digital—and we are somehow worse off. It’s time to admit that we had the wrong theory of the case and chart a new course. Anything else is living in denial.

A Different Future Demands You Reject the Past

Underlying Mr. Podhoretz’s column is a sense of aggrievement that practically drips from each sentence. It’s hard to see the system in which you have succeeded as anything other than legitimate without tarnishing your own achievements. While he is clearly annoyed by what he sees as “didactic,” he seems unwilling to entertain the possibility that a large portion of the country desperately wants to come to terms with our history.

We often see the same thing with senior executives in our transformation work. Yet to chart a new path we must reject the past. As Thomas Kuhn pointed out in his classic, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, every model is flawed. Some can be useful for decades or even centuries, but eventually circumstances change and they become untenable. After a period of tumult, they collapse and a new paradigm emerges.

What Podhoretz misses about both The Falcon and The Winter Soldier is that they were able to make common cause around the values that they shared, not the history that divided them, and partner on a shared mission. That’s what separates those who are able to transform themselves and those who are not. You need to take a hard look and achieve a level of honesty and integrity with yourself before you can inspire trust in others.

In order to improve we first must look with clear eyes on what needs to be corrected in the first place. To paraphrase President Kennedy, we don’t do these things because they are easy, but because they are worthwhile.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Unraveling the Psychology of Pricing

Leave a reply

Enhancing Innovation Strategies

Unraveling the Psychology of Pricing

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

As businesses navigate the ever-evolving landscape of consumer behavior, one key factor that continues to play a pivotal role in driving purchasing decisions is pricing. The psychology of pricing is a fascinating field that delves into the intricate ways in which consumers perceive and react to different pricing strategies. By understanding these principles, businesses can effectively enhance their innovation strategies and drive sustainable growth.

One of the fundamental concepts in the psychology of pricing is price anchoring. This principle suggests that consumers tend to rely heavily on the first piece of information they receive about a product’s price as a reference point for subsequent price judgments. By strategically anchoring prices, businesses can influence the perceived value of their products and steer consumers towards making purchasing decisions in their favor.

A prime example of successful price anchoring can be seen in the case of Apple’s pricing strategy for its iPhone lineup. By introducing a high-priced flagship model such as the iPhone Pro, Apple effectively anchors the prices of its other models, making them appear more affordable by comparison. This strategy not only helps Apple drive sales of its premium models but also boosts the perceived value of its entire product range.

Another powerful concept in the psychology of pricing is price framing. This principle highlights the importance of how prices are presented to consumers in shaping their perceptions of value. For instance, presenting a product’s price as a monthly subscription fee rather than a lump sum can make it appear more affordable and appealing to budget-conscious consumers.

A standout example of effective price framing can be seen in the case of Netflix. By offering a variety of subscription plans at different price points, Netflix caters to a wide range of consumer preferences while also emphasizing the value and convenience of its streaming service. This pricing strategy has not only helped Netflix attract and retain a large customer base but has also positioned the company as a key player in the competitive streaming industry.

Conclusion

Understanding the psychology of pricing is essential for businesses looking to drive innovation and stay ahead in today’s dynamic marketplace. By leveraging principles such as price anchoring and price framing, businesses can enhance their pricing strategies, influence consumer behavior, and ultimately drive sustainable growth. By unraveling the psychology of pricing, businesses can unlock new opportunities for innovation and success in an ever-changing business landscape.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Maintaining Work-Life Balance in a Post-Pandemic Remote Work World

Leave a reply

Maintaining Work-Life Balance in a Post-Pandemic Remote Work World

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

The COVID-19 pandemic has reshaped the way we work, with many businesses transitioning to a remote work model. While this has brought about increased flexibility and convenience for employees, it has also blurred the boundaries between work and personal life, making it challenging to maintain a healthy work-life balance. In order to thrive in this new work environment, it is crucial for employees to prioritize their well-being and find strategies to effectively manage their time and energy.

Case Study 1: Setting Boundaries

One key aspect of maintaining work-life balance in a remote work world is setting boundaries. Without the physical separation between the office and home, it can be easy for work to spill over into personal time. This can lead to burnout and decreased productivity. One case study example is Sarah, a marketing manager who found herself working late into the evening and on weekends in order to keep up with her workload. After experiencing increased stress and exhaustion, she implemented a strict work schedule and designated a specific workspace in her home. By setting clear boundaries, Sarah was able to maintain a healthier balance between work and personal life.

Case Study 2: Self-Care and Work-Life Integration

In addition to setting boundaries, it is important for employees to prioritize self-care and work-life integration. This involves integrating activities that bring joy and relaxation into the daily routine, such as exercise, meditation, and spending quality time with loved ones. Another case study example is Alex, a software developer who struggled to unwind after long hours of coding. He began incorporating short breaks throughout the day to go for a walk or practice mindfulness, which helped him recharge and stay focused. By prioritizing self-care and integrating activities that bring balance into his day, Alex was able to improve his overall well-being and productivity.

Conclusion

As we navigate the challenges of working remotely in a post-pandemic world, it is important for employees to prioritize their mental and physical health in order to maintain a healthy work-life balance. By setting boundaries, prioritizing self-care, and integrating activities that bring joy and relaxation into their routine, employees can thrive in this new work environment and ensure long-term success. Remember, your well-being is just as important as your work – make time for yourself and prioritize what truly matters.

SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of Psychological Safety in Innovation

Leave a reply

The Role of Psychological Safety in Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the rapidly changing world of business, innovation is the lifeblood of sustained success. Harnessing creativity, collaboration, and experimentation is crucial, yet these elements can only thrive in an environment where team members feel psychologically safe. Psychological safety is the belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes. This article explores the vital role of psychological safety in fostering innovation and presents case studies to illustrate its impact in real-world scenarios.

Understanding Psychological Safety

Coined by Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, psychological safety describes a workplace culture where individuals feel secure enough to take interpersonal risks. This concept is critical for innovation because it encourages openness, where employees can freely share ideas, experiment without fear of failure, and embrace creative problem-solving processes.

Benefits of Psychological Safety for Innovation

Encourages Idea Generation: Team members are more likely to propose innovative ideas if they are confident they won’t be ridiculed or dismissed.</ li>
Facilitates Learning from Mistakes: A psychologically safe environment allows teams to learn and grow from failures, turning setbacks into stepping stones for future success.
Enhances Collaboration: When employees feel safe, they are more likely to share knowledge, ask for help, and work together effectively.
Increases Employee Engagement: Psychological safety fosters a sense of belonging and motivation, leading to higher levels of engagement and productivity.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Google’s Project Aristotle

Google embarked on a quest to understand what makes a team effective, which led to Project Aristotle in 2012. Through extensive research, they discovered that psychological safety was the most critical factor in high-performing teams.

Challenges Faced: Google identified that many of their teams struggled with collaboration due to fear of judgment or reproach.

Actions Taken: Google implemented practices to foster psychological safety. This included promoting open dialogue, encouraging risk-taking without penalization, and ensuring every team member’s voice was heard.

Results: Teams that embraced psychological safety showed significant improvements in innovation output, efficiency, and employee satisfaction. The project reinforced that fostering a safe environment for risk-taking and open communications was essential to driving innovation.

Case Study 2: W.L. Gore & Associates

W.L. Gore & Associates, the company behind Gore-Tex, is renowned for its unique organizational culture that emphasizes psychological safety.

Challenges Faced: As a company rooted in innovative product development, ensuring continuous creativity while managing market pressures posed significant challenges.

Actions Taken: W.L. Gore adopted a flat organizational structure and a philosophy called “lattices,” where associates have the freedom to speak up, propose ideas, and lead projects without hierarchical constraints.

Results: This approach led to groundbreaking products and technologies, such as the Gore-Tex fabric. By sustaining an environment where associates felt safe to experiment and potentially fail, Gore consistently maintained a pipeline of innovative products.

Conclusion

Innovation thrives where psychological safety is prioritized. Organizations that nurture an environment of trust and openness not only unlock their employees’ creative potential but also drive sustainable growth and success. Leaders must actively foster psychological safety to build dynamic, innovative teams ready to tackle the challenges of the future.

This article features a thorough examination of the role of psychological safety in innovation, with practical insights conveyed through notable case studies from Google and W.L. Gore & Associates, reinforcing the concept’s critical importance in real-world applications.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Encouraging a Risk-Taking Mindset in Your Organization

Leave a reply

Encouraging a Risk-Taking Mindset in Your Organization

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The rapid pace of change in today’s business environment demands agility and a willingness to take risks. However, fostering a risk-taking mindset in an organization is easier said than done. It requires deliberate strategy, clear communication, and a supportive culture. Here, we’ll explore practical steps to encourage this mindset by examining two case studies from companies that have successfully navigated this transformation.

Case Study 1: 3M

Overview

3M, a global innovation company, is often cited as a model for fostering a risk-taking culture. Known for its wide range of products and significant number of patents, 3M has embedded risk-taking in its corporate DNA.

Actions Taken

15% Rule: 3M encourages its employees to spend 15% of their work time on ideas of their choosing. This policy gives employees the freedom to explore and experiment without the immediate pressure of delivering results.
Cross-Functional Teams: By forming cross-functional teams, 3M brings diverse perspectives together, promoting creative solutions and informed risk-taking.
Learning from Failure: 3M celebrates both successes and learnings from failures. They hold ‘failure parties’ to dissect what went wrong and how it can be avoided in the future, thereby destigmatizing failure.

Results

3M’s risk-taking culture has led to products like Post-it Notes and Scotch Tape, revolutionizing the stationery market. Their approach demonstrates that calculated risks, backed by support and learning, can lead to groundbreaking innovations.

Case Study 2: Google

Overview

Google, a pioneer in the tech industry, is another example of a company that thrives on a risk-taking ethos. Their rapid expansion into a variety of tech-related fields is a testament to their willingness to venture into the unknown.

Actions Taken

Psychological Safety: Google places high importance on creating environments where employees feel safe to take risks. Project Aristotle highlighted psychological safety as a key component of their high-performing teams.
Dedicated Innovation Labs: Google runs innovation labs like X (formerly Google X), which are dedicated to ‘moonshot’ projects with high risk and high reward.
Clear Metrics: For each experimental project, Google sets clear milestones and metrics, allowing for informed go/no-go decisions rather than arbitrary cuts based on gut feeling.

Results

Google’s approach to risk-taking has birthed revolutionary products like Google Search, Gmail, and self-driving car technology. By emphasizing psychological safety and creating dedicated spaces for risk, Google continues to lead in innovation.

Key Takeaways

From these case studies, we can extract several key practices that any organization can implement to foster a risk-taking mindset:

Encourage Time for Exploration: Allocate time for employees to work on passion projects and explore new ideas.
Promote Cross-Functional Collaboration: Bring together diverse teams to fuel innovative thinking.
Create a Safe Environment for Failure: Celebrate learnings from failures to reduce the stigma and fear associated with taking risks.
Set Clear Metrics and Milestones: Provide clarity on what success looks like to make informed decisions.
Support from Leadership: Ensure that leaders actively support and model risk-taking behavior.

By embedding these practices into the fabric of your organization, you can create a dynamic environment where innovation thrives, and calculated risks lead to transformative successes.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Cultivating a Growth Mindset Among Your Team

Leave a reply

Cultivating a Growth Mindset Among Your Team

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s ever-evolving business landscape, the ability of a team to embrace challenges, learn from setbacks, and continuously strive for improvement is paramount. This adaptability is rooted in what psychologists Carol Dweck and her colleagues have termed the “growth mindset.” It’s characterized by the belief that abilities and intelligence can be developed through dedication, hard work, and the right strategies. This article delves into the principles of fostering a growth mindset within your team and presents two real-world case studies that illustrate its transformative power.

Principles of a Growth Mindset

Embrace Challenges: Encourage your team to step out of their comfort zones and tackle difficult projects.
Learn from Criticism: Constructive feedback should be seen as a tool for improvement rather than a personal attack.
Persistence: Promote perseverance, even when tasks become tough, and celebrate small victories along the way.
Effort is Essential: Recognize hard work and effort as pathways to mastering new skills and achieving goals.
Celebrate Growth: Acknowledge progress and development, not just end results.

The Roadmap to Cultivating Growth Mindset

Implementing a growth mindset culture requires consistent effort and intention. Start by exemplifying the mindset yourself and follow through with coaching, training, and an environment that allows for experimentation and constructive failure.

Case Study 1: XYZ Tech Innovators

Background: XYZ Tech Innovators was a startup struggling with high employee turnover and stalling project deadlines. The leadership team identified a fixed mindset culture as the core issue.

Approach: The company implemented a series of workshops focused on the principles of a growth mindset. Managers were trained to deliver constructive feedback focused on effort and strategies rather than innate talent. The company also encouraged employees to set personal growth goals and paired them with mentors.

Outcome: The initiative transformed the workplace environment. Employees started taking on more ambitious projects, and team collaboration improved. Within a year, employee turnover decreased by 30%, and project completion rates soared by 50%.

Case Study 2: ABC Retail Group

Background: ABC Retail Group was facing stagnation in innovation and product development. Team members were hesitant to pitch new ideas, fearing failure and criticism.

Approach: To shift the cultural mindset, ABC Retail Group introduced an “Innovation Lab” where employees could experiment with new ideas without the pressure of immediate success. The lab was a failure-tolerant environment where learning from mistakes was encouraged and expected.

Outcome: Within six months, the lab produced several viable new products. Team members reported feeling more creative and less anxious about proposing ideas. The company’s innovation index, a measure of new product success, increased by 40% in the following year.

Conclusion

Instilling a growth mindset within your team is a dynamic and rewarding process. As evidenced by these case studies, the benefits extend beyond individual performance improvements to foster a culture of continuous learning, innovation, and resilience. By embracing the core principles of a growth mindset, your team can navigate challenges more effectively and unlock unprecedented levels of success.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Leveraging Diversity: Enhancing Creativity through Inclusive Workplaces

Leave a reply

Leveraging Diversity: Enhancing Creativity through Inclusive Workplaces

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s rapidly evolving and interconnected world, the success of organizations hinges on their ability to foster innovation and creativity. To achieve this, organizations must recognize the value of diversity and create inclusive workplaces that empower individuals from all backgrounds to contribute their unique perspectives. By leveraging diversity, organizations can unlock the full potential of their teams, drive creative problem-solving, and gain a competitive edge. In this article, we will explore the connection between diversity and creativity, and present two compelling case studies that demonstrate the transformative power of inclusive workplaces.

Case Study 1: Pixar Animation Studios

Pixar Animation Studios, renowned for creating beloved films like Toy Story and Finding Nemo, has long understood the importance of diversity in driving creativity. In 2012, Ed Catmull, President of Pixar, reflected on their journey towards building a diverse and inclusive workforce. He shared that while the company initially struggled with diversity, they recognized the need to tap into different voices to propel their storytelling forward.

Pixar embarked on a mission to actively seek out diverse talent and foster an inclusive environment where everyone’s ideas were valued. The result was a creative explosion, with films that resonated deeply and appealed to a wide range of audiences. Films such as Coco, which celebrated Mexican culture and traditions, showcased the power of diverse perspectives and became a global success.

Through intentional efforts to create an inclusive workplace, Pixar not only enhanced their creativity, but also fostered a culture that attracted top talent from diverse backgrounds. This case study demonstrates that by embracing diversity and eliminating barriers, organizations can create an environment where creativity thrives, leading to exceptional outcomes.

Case Study 2: Airbnb

The story of Airbnb’s journey towards embracing diversity and inclusivity offers another inspiring example of how organizations can enhance creativity. In 2016, Airbnb faced criticism for issues related to discrimination on its platform. In response, the company took immediate action, acknowledging the problem and committing to change.

With the belief that diversity leads to better decision-making and innovation, Airbnb took significant steps to address the issue and create a more inclusive platform. They implemented mandatory cultural competence training for all employees, established a non-discrimination policy, and expanded their efforts to recruit diverse candidates across all levels.

These initiatives had a profound impact on Airbnb’s organizational culture and empowered employees to embrace the concept of belonging. The company saw a surge in creativity, as employees from various backgrounds felt valued and comfortable sharing their unique ideas. This resulted in the creation of innovative features such as “experiences” on the Airbnb platform, which opened up new revenue streams and increased customer engagement.

Conclusion

The case studies of Pixar Animation Studios and Airbnb vividly demonstrate the immense benefits organizations can reap by leveraging diversity and creating inclusive workplaces. By fostering an environment that embraces different perspectives, organizations enable their teams to think outside the box, challenge conventional wisdom, and generate groundbreaking ideas.

Diverse teams bring a wealth of experiences, knowledge, and cultural insights, which fuel innovation and make organizations adaptable in an increasingly diverse world. To maximize creativity, organizations should prioritize diversity at all levels, ensure equal opportunities, invest in cultural competence training, and create a culture of inclusion where every voice is heard and respected.

As human-centered design professionals, our duty is to champion the cause of diversity and be at the forefront of creating inclusive workplaces that drive creativity, solve complex problems, and inspire positive change. By embracing diversity, we can harness the full potential of human creativity, paving the way for a brighter and more inclusive future.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.