Category Archives: Psychology

How will humans change in the next 10,000 years?

Future evolution: from looks to brains and personality

GUEST POST from Nicholas R. Longrich, University of Bath

READER QUESTION: If humans don’t die out in a climate apocalypse or asteroid impact in the next 10,000 years, are we likely to evolve further into a more advanced species than what we are at the moment? Harry Bonas, 57, Nigeria

Humanity is the unlikely result of 4 billion years of evolution.

From self-replicating molecules in Archean seas, to eyeless fish in the Cambrian deep, to mammals scurrying from dinosaurs in the dark, and then, finally, improbably, ourselves – evolution shaped us.

Organisms reproduced imperfectly. Mistakes made when copying genes sometimes made them better fit to their environments, so those genes tended to get passed on. More reproduction followed, and more mistakes, the process repeating over billions of generations. Finally, Homo sapiens appeared. But we aren’t the end of that story. Evolution won’t stop with us, and we might even be evolving faster than ever.

This article is part of Life’s Big Questions

The Conversation’s new series, co-published with BBC Future, seeks to answer our readers’ nagging questions about life, love, death and the universe. We work with professional researchers who have dedicated their lives to uncovering new perspectives on the questions that shape our lives.

It’s hard to predict the future. The world will probably change in ways we can’t imagine. But we can make educated guesses. Paradoxically, the best way to predict the future is probably looking back at the past, and assuming past trends will continue going forward. This suggests some surprising things about our future.

We will likely live longer and become taller, as well as more lightly built. We’ll probably be less aggressive and more agreeable, but have smaller brains. A bit like a golden retriever, we’ll be friendly and jolly, but maybe not that interesting. At least, that’s one possible future. But to understand why I think that’s likely, we need to look at biology.

The end of natural selection?

Some scientists have argued that civilisation’s rise ended natural selection. It’s true that selective pressures that dominated in the past – predators, famine, plague, warfare – have mostly disappeared.

Starvation and famine were largely ended by high-yield crops, fertilisers and family planning. Violence and war are less common than ever, despite modern militaries with nuclear weapons, or maybe because of them. The lions, wolves and sabertoothed cats that hunted us in the dark are endangered or extinct. Plagues that killed millions – smallpox, Black Death, cholera – were tamed by vaccines, antibiotics, clean water.

But evolution didn’t stop; other things just drive it now. Evolution isn’t so much about survival of the fittest as reproduction of the fittest. Even if nature is less likely to murder us, we still need to find partners and raise children, so sexual selection now plays a bigger role in our evolution.

And if nature doesn’t control our evolution anymore, the unnatural environment we’ve created – culture, technology, cities – produces new selective pressures very unlike those we faced in the ice age. We’re poorly adapted to this modern world; it follows that we’ll have to adapt.

And that process has already started. As our diets changed to include grains and dairy, we evolved genes to help us digest starch and milk. When dense cities created conditions for disease to spread, mutations for disease resistance spread too. And for some reason, our brains have got smaller. Unnatural environments create unnatural selection.

To predict where this goes, we’ll look at our prehistory, studying trends over the past 6 million years of evolution. Some trends will continue, especially those that emerged in the past 10,000 years, after agriculture and civilisation were invented.

We’re also facing new selective pressures, such as reduced mortality. Studying the past doesn’t help here, but we can see how other species responded to similar pressures. Evolution in domestic animals may be especially relevant – arguably we’re becoming a kind of domesticated ape, but curiously, one domesticated by ourselves.

I’ll use this approach to make some predictions, if not always with high confidence. That is, I’ll speculate.

Lifespan

Humans will almost certainly evolve to live longer – much longer. Life cycles evolve in response to mortality rates, how likely predators and other threats are to kill you. When mortality rates are high, animals must reproduce young, or might not reproduce at all. There’s also no advantage to evolving mutations that prevent ageing or cancer – you won’t live long enough to use them.

When mortality rates are low, the opposite is true. It’s better to take your time reaching sexual maturity. It’s also useful to have adaptations that extend lifespan, and fertility, giving you more time to reproduce. That’s why animals with few predators – animals that live on islands or in the deep ocean, or are simply big – evolve longer lifespans. Greenland sharks, Galapagos tortoises and bowhead whales mature late, and can live for centuries.

Even before civilisation, people were unique among apes in having low mortality and long lives. Hunter-gatherers armed with spears and bows could defend against predators; food sharing prevented starvation. So we evolved delayed sexual maturity, and long lifespans – up to 70 years.

Still, child mortality was high – approaching 50% or more by age 15. Average life expectancy was just 35 years. Even after the rise of civilisation, child mortality stayed high until the 19th century, while life expectancy went down – to 30 years – due to plagues and famines.

Then, in the past two centuries, better nutrition, medicine and hygiene reduced youth mortality to under 1% in most developed nations. Life expectancy soared to 70 years worldwide , and 80 in developed countries. These increases are due to improved health, not evolution – but they set the stage for evolution to extend our lifespan.

Now, there’s little need to reproduce early. If anything, the years of training needed to be a doctor, CEO, or carpenter incentivise putting it off. And since our life expectancy has doubled, adaptations to prolong lifespan and child-bearing years are now advantageous. Given that more and more people live to 100 or even 110 years – the record being 122 years – there’s reason to think our genes could evolve until the average person routinely lives 100 years or even more.

Size, and strength

Animals often evolve larger size over time; it’s a trend seen in tyrannosaurs, whales, horses and primates – including hominins.

Early hominins like Australopithecus afarensis and Homo habilis were small, four to five feet (120cm-150cm) tall. Later hominins – Homo erectus, Neanderthals, Homo sapiens – grew taller. We’ve continued to gain height in historic times, partly driven by improved nutrition, but genes seem to be evolving too.

Why we got big is unclear. In part, mortality may drive size evolution; growth takes time, so longer lives mean more time to grow. But human females also prefer tall males. So both lower mortality and sexual preferences will likely cause humans to get taller. Today, the tallest people in the world are in Europe, led by the Netherlands. Here, men average 183cm (6ft); women 170cm (5ft 6in). Someday, most people might be that tall, or taller.

As we’ve grown taller, we’ve become more gracile. Over the past 2 million years, our skeletons became more lightly built as we relied less on brute force, and more on tools and weapons. As farming forced us to settle down, our lives became more sedentary, so our bone density decreased. As we spend more time behind desks, keyboards and steering wheels, these trends will likely continue.

Humans have also reduced our muscles compared to other apes, especially in our upper bodies. That will probably continue. Our ancestors had to slaughter antelopes and dig roots; later they tilled and reaped in the fields. Modern jobs increasingly require working with people, words and code – they take brains, not muscle. Even for manual laborers – farmers, fisherman, lumberjacks – machinery such as tractors, hydraulics and chainsaws now shoulder a lot of the work. As physical strength becomes less necessary, our muscles will keep shrinking.

Our jaws and teeth also got smaller. Early, plant-eating hominins had huge molars and mandibles for grinding fibrous vegetables. As we shifted to meat, then started cooking food, jaws and teeth shrank. Modern processed food – chicken nuggets, Big Macs, cookie dough ice cream – needs even less chewing, so jaws will keep shrinking, and we’ll likely lose our wisdom teeth.

Beauty

After people left Africa 100,000 years ago, humanity’s far-flung tribes became isolated by deserts, oceans, mountains, glaciers and sheer distance. In various parts of the world, different selective pressures – different climates, lifestyles and beauty standards – caused our appearance to evolve in different ways. Tribes evolved distinctive skin colour, eyes, hair and facial features.

With civilisation’s rise and new technologies, these populations were linked again. Wars of conquest, empire building, colonisation and trade – including trade of other humans – all shifted populations, which interbred. Today, road, rail and aircraft link us too. Bushmen would walk 40 miles to find a partner; we’ll go 4,000 miles. We’re increasingly one, worldwide population – freely mixing. That will create a world of hybrids – light brown skinned, dark-haired, Afro-Euro-Australo-Americo-Asians, their skin colour and facial features tending toward a global average.

Sexual selection will further accelerate the evolution of our appearance. With most forms of natural selection no longer operating, mate choice will play a larger role. Humans might become more attractive, but more uniform in appearance. Globalised media may also create more uniform standards of beauty, pushing all humans towards a single ideal. Sex differences, however, could be exaggerated if the ideal is masculine-looking men and feminine-looking women.

Intelligence and personality

Last, our brains and minds, our most distinctively human feature, will evolve, perhaps dramatically. Over the past 6 million years, hominin brain size roughly tripled, suggesting selection for big brains driven by tool use, complex societies and language. It might seem inevitable that this trend will continue, but it probably won’t.

Instead, our brains are getting smaller. In Europe, brain size peaked 10,000—20,000 years ago, just before we invented farming. Then, brains got smaller. Modern humans have brains smaller than our ancient predecessors, or even medieval people. It’s unclear why.

It could be that fat and protein were scarce once we shifted to farming, making it more costly to grow and maintain large brains. Brains are also energetically expensive – they burn around 20% of our daily calories. In agricultural societies with frequent famine, a big brain might be a liability.

Maybe hunter-gatherer life was demanding in ways farming isn’t. In civilisation, you don’t need to outwit lions and antelopes, or memorise every fruit tree and watering hole within 1,000 square miles. Making and using bows and spears also requires fine motor control, coordination, the ability to track animals and trajectories — maybe the parts of our brains used for those things got smaller when we stopped hunting.

Or maybe living in a large society of specialists demands less brainpower than living in a tribe of generalists. Stone-age people mastered many skills – hunting, tracking, foraging for plants, making herbal medicines and poisons, crafting tools, waging war, making music and magic. Modern humans perform fewer, more specialised roles as part of vast social networks, exploiting division of labour. In a civilisation, we specialise on a trade, then rely on others for everything else.

That being said, brain size isn’t everything: elephants and orcas have bigger brains than us, and Einstein’s brain was smaller than average. Neanderthals had brains comparable to ours, but more of the brain was devoted to sight and control of the body, suggesting less capacity for things like language and tool use. So how much the loss of brain mass affects overall intelligence is unclear. Maybe we lost certain abilities, while enhancing others that are more relevant to modern life. It’s possible that we’ve maintained processing power by having fewer, smaller neurons. Still, I worry about what that missing 10% of my grey matter did.

Curiously, domestic animals also evolved smaller brains. Sheep lost 24% of their brain mass after domestication; for cows, it’s 26%; dogs, 30%. This raises an unsettling possibility. Maybe being more willing to passively go with the flow (perhaps even thinking less), like a domesticated animal, has been bred into us, like it was for them.

Our personalities must be evolving too. Hunter-gatherers’ lives required aggression. They hunted large mammals, killed over partners and warred with neighbouring tribes. We get meat from a store, and turn to police and courts to settle disputes. If war hasn’t disappeared, it now accounts for fewer deaths, relative to population, than at any time in history. Aggression, now a maladaptive trait, could be bred out.

Changing social patterns will also change personalities. Humans live in much larger groups than other apes, forming tribes of around 1,000 in hunter-gatherers. But in today’s world people living in vast cities of millions. In the past, our relationships were necessarily few, and often lifelong. Now we inhabit seas of people, moving often for work, and in the process forming thousands of relationships, many fleeting and, increasingly, virtual. This world will push us to become more outgoing, open and tolerant. Yet navigating such vast social networks may also require we become more willing to adapt ourselves to them – to be more conformist.

Not everyone is psychologically well-adapted to this existence. Our instincts, desires and fears are largely those of stone-age ancestors, who found meaning in hunting and foraging for their families, warring with their neighbours and praying to ancestor-spirits in the dark. Modern society meets our material needs well, but is less able to meet the psychological needs of our primitive caveman brains.

Perhaps because of this, increasing numbers of people suffer from psychological issues such as loneliness, anxiety and depression. Many turn to alcohol and other substances to cope. Selection against vulnerability to these conditions might improve our mental health, and make us happier as a species. But that could come at a price. Many great geniuses had their demons; leaders like Abraham Lincoln and Winston Churchill fought with depression, as did scientists such as Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin, and artists like Herman Melville and Emily Dickinson. Some, like Virginia Woolf, Vincent Van Gogh and Kurt Cobain, took their own lives. Others – Billy Holliday, Jimi Hendrix and Jack Kerouac – were destroyed by substance abuse.

A disturbing thought is that troubled minds will be removed from the gene pool – but potentially at the cost of eliminating the sort of spark that created visionary leaders, great writers, artists and musicians. Future humans might be better adjusted – but less fun to party with and less likely to launch a scientific revolution — stable, happy and boring.

New species?

There were once nine human species, now it’s just us. But could new human species evolve? For that to happen, we’d need isolated populations subject to distinct selective pressures. Distance no longer isolates us, but reproductive isolation could theoretically be achieved by selective mating. If people were culturally segregated – marrying based on religion, class, caste, or even politics – distinct populations, even species, might evolve.

In The Time Machine, sci-fi novelist H.G. Wells saw a future where class created distinct species. Upper classes evolved into the beautiful but useless Eloi, and the working classes become the ugly, subterranean Morlocks – who revolted and enslaved the Eloi.

In the past, religion and lifestyle have sometimes produced genetically distinct groups, as seen in for example Jewish and Gypsy populations. Today, politics also divides us – could it divide us genetically? Liberals now move to be near other liberals, and conservatives to be near conservatives; many on the left won’t date Trump supporters and vice versa.

Could this create two species, with instinctively different views? Probably not. Still, to the extent culture divides us, it could drive evolution in different ways, in different people. If cultures become more diverse, this could maintain and increase human genetic diversity.

Strange New Possibilities

So far, I’ve mostly taken a historical perspective, looking back. But in some ways, the future might be radically unlike the past. Evolution itself has evolved.

One of the more extreme possibilities is directed evolution, where we actively control our species’ evolution. We already breed ourselves when we choose partners with appearances and personalities we like. For thousands of years, hunter-gatherers arranged marriages, seeking good hunters for their daughters. Even where children chose partners, men were generally expected to seek approval of the bride’s parents. Similar traditions survive elsewhere today. In other words, we breed our own children.

And going forward, we’ll do this with far more knowledge of what we’re doing, and more control over the genes of our progeny. We can already screen ourselves and embryos for genetic diseases. We could potentially choose embryos for desirable genes, as we do with crops. Direct editing of the DNA of a human embryo has been proven to be possible — but seems morally abhorrent, effectively turning children into subjects of medical experimentation. And yet, if such technologies were proven safe, I could imagine a future where you’d be a bad parent not to give your children the best genes possible.

Computers also provide an entirely new selective pressure. As more and more matches are made on smartphones, we are delegating decisions about what the next generation looks like to computer algorithms, who recommend our potential matches. Digital code now helps choose what genetic code passed on to future generations, just like it shapes what you stream or buy online. This might sound like dark science fiction, but it’s already happening. Our genes are being curated by computer, just like our playlists. It’s hard to know where this leads, but I wonder if it’s entirely wise to turn over the future of our species to iPhones, the internet and the companies behind them.

Discussions of human evolution are usually backward looking, as if the greatest triumphs and challenges were in the distant past. But as technology and culture enter a period of accelerating change, our genes will too. Arguably, the most interesting parts of evolution aren’t life’s origins, dinosaurs, or Neanderthals, but what’s happening right now, our present – and our future.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Four Reasons the Big Quit Exists

Leave a reply

Four Reasons the Big Quit Exists

Turns out the pandemic prompted mass numbers of employees finally say, “take this job and shove it” to employers and careers they don’t like. Life is too short to be miserable at work.

In a recent NICE Webinar, we discussed how job quit rates have hit a historic high—even while the economy is still recovering from two years of furloughs and layoffs. This is often referred to as The Great Resignation.

Enlightening research from Gallup gathered in March of 2021 found that 48% of the working population in the United States is actively job-hunting or seeking out new opportunities.[1]

NICE Employee Churn word cloud

So, while we watch the labor market churn with no signs of settling, how can businesses avoid the costs of high turnover rates?

“How to Reduce the Risk of Employee Churn Amid the Big Quit”
(click to continue reading this article on the NICE blog)

Image credits: NICE

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Reducing Employee Churn During the Great Resignation

Leave a reply

For those of you struggling with your staffing levels or with finding talent during these exceedingly challenging times, I have exciting news to share!

My latest commissioned webinar is now available ON DEMAND:

Stop the Madness! How to reduce the risk of employee churn amid the Great Resignation

Synopsis from NICE CXone page:

It’s being called The Great Resignation: Millions of employees leaving their jobs every month! While the trend affects every industry, nowhere else is it felt more acutely than in contact centers. How do you keep agent churn from derailing your contact center?

Smart organizations know that it’s about more than salaries. Agents want work-life balance, and on the job, great tools and support to help them do their jobs well.

In this On-Demand webinar I explore what’s driving the Great Resignation and how to keep your agents engaged and satisfied.

Learn important strategies for keeping your agents from walking out the door:

How giving agents purpose creates job satisfaction.

How to create flexibility for agents to improve work-life balance.

How to keep hybrid workforces connected and engaged.

Click here to access the webinar

I hope you enjoy it!

Please post any questions below in the comments.

There will be an accompanying white paper available soon.

NOTE: Commissioned thought leadership (articles, white papers, webinars, etc.) to accelerate a company’s sales and marketing efforts (including lead generation) is one of the services I provide in addition to the speeches and workshops I deliver as an innovation speaker.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

It is Easier to Change People than to Change People

1 Reply

It is Easier to Change People than to Change People

GUEST POST from Annette Franz

The work that we do as customer experience professionals can often be summed up as change management – or change leadership. One of the key and critical parts of this change management effort is to ensure we have executive commitment for the work that lies ahead. As a matter of fact, in an article I wrote a couple months ago about some research that GetFeedback had released, I noted these findings:

Respondents shared what degree executives were invested in CX efforts, how much, and to what end. When executives invest in customer experience, brands are three times more likely to yield return on investment (ROI) than those who don’t have that commitment from executives.

So their commitment is important. (Their ROI will come!) It ensures that you get the resources – human, capital, financial, time, etc. – needed to move forward successfully with your transformation work. They should express commitment (to the CX team and to the company) that the entire executive team is all in and that they’ve accepted that building a customer-centric organization means we’re building a winning organization.

But what if that commitment is lacking? What if you’re executives don’t get it? What if every plea to explain why transforming the culture, the employee experience, and the customer experience lands on deaf ears? What if some get it and some don’t?

Let’s think about this…

Years ago, I had an interesting conversation with James Lawther about executives and their lack of understanding regarding their critical roles in the transformation and the importance of their commitment. He had commented on a post about executives “not getting it” with this: “In which case, rather than trying to change your executive, wouldn’t you be better moving on and changing your executive instead?” I was recently reminded of his comment when I saw the quote, “It’s easier to change people than to change people.”

Perhaps, sometimes we just need new executives. Sadly, those who get it are few and far between. It’s one of the reasons I wrote Built to Win, i.e., to inspire leaders to think differently about customer-centricity and building a winning organization through deliberately designing a customer-centric culture – from the top.

Back to the conversation with James. We weren’t too far off on this thinking, this idea of changing executives. Geoffrey Moore (author of Crossing the Chasm and Zone to Win) published an article on LinkedIn last month titled, Three Easy Mistakes to Make, which he actually referred to as compromises leaders shouldn’t make as the business grows and matures or evolves. One of those mistakes was this: Adjusting your organizational model to fit your people instead of the other way around. He writes:

People who have been with the team for a long time often feel entitled to the next promotion in their career path, and because we have all worked together during this time, we can feel obligated to accommodate them. Now, when your industry is not being disrupted, experience does matter, so promoting from within is often a good strategy. But when disruption strikes, organizations need to change, often dramatically, and the new leaders need to be grounded in the emerging paradigm. That is, they have to make quick decisions with little data based on pattern recognition and then course-correct them as the data comes in. If the person in place does not have that pattern recognition, if instead, they have to learn the new system even as they are in the midst of operating it, decision-making slows down dramatically, and an agile approach becomes impossible. For times like this, you need to bring in someone who already has the mindset needed to play the new hand. You already know that what got you here won’t get you there. Just remember that applies to people as well.

Why would you do that? Why wouldn’t you make sure you’ve got the right people on the bus to ensure success, to ensure that the organizational model (and, of course, in this case, I’m thinking about building out your customer-centric culture) has every chance to flourish? Why would you, instead, keep the same people to build a different organization, especially those who constantly say, “But we’ve always done it this way. This is how we do things here.”

I prefer to say, “Nothing changes if nothing changes.” Either the thinking has to change or the people have to change.

As Geoffrey says, “For times like this, you need to bring in someone who already has the mindset needed to play the new hand. You already know that what got you here won’t get you there. Just remember that applies to people as well.”

Maybe some of the up-and-coming leaders will bring a fresh perspective and find my open letter to CEOs an affirmation, as in, “No need to tell me all of that once, much less twice!” Be that person with the mindset to play the new hand. Or be the person who gets replaced.

People change over the years, and that changes situations for good and for bad. ~ Bobby Knight

This article originally appeared on CX Journey

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How Reward and Recognition Systems Boost Morale and Performance

Leave a reply

How Reward and Recognition Systems Boost Morale and Performance

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s competitive business environment, organizations continuously seek innovative ways to enhance employee motivation and performance. Integrating effective reward and recognition systems is a crucial strategy that can significantly improve workplace morale. By acknowledging their employees’ hard work and achievements, companies can foster a culture of appreciation and motivation, ultimately leading to enhanced productivity and performance.

Understanding Reward and Recognition Systems

Reward and recognition systems are structured approaches adopted by organizations to acknowledge, appreciate, and incentivize employees. While rewards might involve monetary incentives, recognitions usually encompass expressing appreciation through non-monetary means. Both elements are crucial in building employee morale and motivation.

Key Elements of an Effective System

Clear Objectives: Establishing transparent and achievable goals that align with organizational values and objectives.
Diverse Rewards: Offering various incentives that cater to the diverse needs and preferences of employees.
Timely Recognition: Ensuring that recognition is timely and relevant, which enhances the impact of the acknowledgment.
Inclusive Participation: Inviting feedback and participation from employees to ensure the system meets their expectations.

Case Study 1: Tech Innovators Inc.

Background

Tech Innovators Inc., a leading software development company, experienced a downturn in employee engagement and productivity. The leadership team recognized the need to rejuvenate the work environment and boost morale.

Solution

The company implemented a comprehensive reward and recognition program, focusing on innovative and peer-based recognition. A digital platform was introduced, allowing employees to recognize one another’s contributions in real-time, alongside a points system that could be redeemed for various rewards.

Impact

The initiative resulted in a 30% increase in employee engagement scores and a noticeable improvement in project delivery times. Employees felt more appreciated and motivated, leading to a vibrant and supportive company culture.

Case Study 2: Greenfields Manufacturing

Background

Greenfields Manufacturing, a sustainable production company, faced challenges with high turnover rates and low employee satisfaction. Leadership realized the need for strategic intervention to retain talent and improve morale.

Solution

The organization introduced a multifaceted recognition system that celebrated milestones and daily achievements. Managers were trained to give personalized recognition during team meetings, and a monthly award ceremony was introduced for outstanding contributions.

Impact

Following the implementation, Greenfields experienced a 40% reduction in turnover rates and a substantial increase in employee satisfaction scores. Employees reported higher job satisfaction and a deeper commitment to the company’s mission and values.

Conclusion

Effective reward and recognition systems can profoundly influence organizational culture, morale, and performance. By strategically designing these systems to encompass diverse, timely, and inclusive approaches, organizations can create vibrant work environments that encourage innovation and commitment.

Both Tech Innovators Inc. and Greenfields Manufacturing demonstrate that carefully curated reward and recognition systems are powerful tools in driving employee engagement and improving overall organizational performance. Organizations striving for excellence must prioritize these systems to cultivate a motivated and dedicated workforce.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Shifting Mindset to Lead with Innovation in Mind

Leave a reply

Shifting Mindset to Lead with Innovation in Mind

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In our fast-paced world, continuous adaptation and innovation are crucial for success. The cornerstone of driving meaningful change is a shift in mindset. By fostering a culture of innovation, leaders can effectively guide their organizations through evolving landscapes. In this article, we explore the concept of human-centered change, focusing on two powerful case studies that illuminate the impact of mindset shifts in leading with innovation.

Understanding Human-Centered Innovation

The essence of human-centered innovation lies in recognizing the central role of people—employees, customers, and stakeholders—within the change process. By prioritizing empathy and inclusivity, organizations can design solutions that are not only innovative but also aligned with human needs and aspirations.

Case Study 1: Microsoft – Transforming Culture through Empathy

The Scenario

Microsoft, once perceived as a software behemoth lagging in innovation, needed a transformative approach to regain its competitive edge. Under the leadership of CEO Satya Nadella, a profound mindset shift was initiated with empathy at its core.

The Mindset Shift

Nadella prioritized a cultural transformation, encouraging a growth mindset across the organization. By valuing learning from failures and embracing diverse perspectives, Microsoft fostered a supportive and inclusive workplace.

The Impact

This cultural overhaul led to groundbreaking advancements, such as the remarkable success of Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform. The focus on empathy and collaboration not only reinvigorated innovation but also greatly improved employee satisfaction and retention.

Case Study 2: Airbnb – Designing with Users in Mind

The Scenario

Airbnb faced significant challenges as it sought to expand globally while facing regulatory hurdles and increasing competition. The company needed to innovate its approach to maintain its unique value proposition.

The Mindset Shift

Airbnb embraced a human-centered design approach. By deeply understanding their hosts’ and guests’ experiences, they crafted solutions that addressed key pain points, enhancing trust and safety within their platform.

The Impact

Implementing these insights led to the introduction of features like “Superhost” and improved review systems, which bolstered user confidence. This user-centered innovation enabled Airbnb to solidify its market position and drive sustainable growth.

Key Takeaways

These case studies highlight the transformative power of mindset shifts rooted in human-centered principles. From fostering empathy to prioritizing user experiences, organizations can cultivate a culture of innovation by embracing these practices:

Encourage a Growth Mindset: Nurture an environment where failures are viewed as learning opportunities, fostering innovation and resilience.
Empathize with Stakeholders: Actively engage with the needs and concerns of employees and customers to ensure solutions are impactful and human-centric.
Promote Collaborative Environments: Break down silos and encourage cross-functional collaboration to harness diverse perspectives and drive creative solutions.

Conclusion

The journey toward human-centered innovation requires a fundamental shift in mindset. By leading with empathy, inclusivity, and a commitment to understanding human needs, organizations can unlock new levels of creativity and competitive advantage. As demonstrated by Microsoft and Airbnb, such transformation not only fuels innovation but also strengthens connections with those who matter most—people.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Emotional Well-being as a Pillar of Employee Experience

Leave a reply

Emotional Well-being as a Pillar of Employee Experience

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the ever-evolving landscape of work, organizations are increasingly recognizing that fostering a positive employee experience is crucial. Traditionally, companies focused on tangible benefits like compensation and office perks. However, it is becoming clearer that emotional well-being is fundamental to a holistic employee experience. As a thought leader in change and innovation, I am committed to exploring how organizations can integrate emotional well-being into their core strategies for sustainable growth and employee satisfaction.

The Importance of Emotional Well-being

Emotional well-being refers to an individual’s ability to manage and express emotions healthily. In the workplace, it impacts productivity, creativity, and overall job satisfaction. Employees who feel emotionally supported are more engaged, motivated, and loyal. Thus, emotional well-being is not just a benefit but a strategic pillar in crafting an exceptional employee experience.

Case Study #1: Google’s Comprehensive Mental Health Program

Google, known for its pioneering employee policies, has been at the forefront of integrating emotional well-being into the employee experience. The company recognized that stress and mental health issues were affecting productivity and employee satisfaction.

Google’s approach includes a comprehensive mental health program that offers resources such as counseling services, stress management workshops, and meditation classes. They also provide tools and platforms for ongoing peer support.

The results have been impressive. Google reports increased employee retention and engagement scores, along with a noticeable decrease in burnout-related issues. The company’s success underscores the importance of addressing emotional well-being proactively.

Case Study #2: Salesforce’s Ohana Culture

Salesforce has adopted the Hawaiian concept of “Ohana,” meaning family, to craft a nurturing and supportive workplace environment. This culture emphasizes empathy, mutual support, and open communication as central to the employee experience.

Salesforce’s initiatives include offering personalized mental health resources such as therapy sessions and wellness reimbursements. They also conduct regular mental health surveys to tailor support to employee needs effectively.

By treating employees like family, Salesforce has achieved remarkable results. Employee satisfaction scores are high, and the company has become recognized as one of the best places to work globally. Salesforce’s approach highlights how cultural integration of emotional well-being can lead to profound organizational benefits.

Integrating Emotional Well-being into Organizational Strategy

To successfully integrate emotional well-being into the employee experience, organizations must move beyond traditional benefits and adopt a holistic approach:

Leadership Commitment: Senior leaders must champion emotional well-being initiatives, demonstrating commitment from the top levels of management.
Tailored Programs: Programs should be adaptable to meet diverse employee needs, considering varying cultural and personal backgrounds.
Open Communication: Encourage open dialogue about mental health to de-stigmatize these discussions and foster a supportive environment.
Continuous Feedback: Regularly solicit employee feedback to adapt and improve emotional well-being initiatives.

Conclusion

As organizations strive to innovate and remain competitive, embedding emotional well-being into the employee experience is not merely an option but a necessity. The insights from Google and Salesforce demonstrate that when employees feel emotionally supported, companies benefit in terms of productivity, retention, and reputation.

Empowering employees to thrive emotionally creates a ripple effect that enhances business performance and contributes to a more humane and sustainable workplace culture. By prioritizing emotional well-being, companies can build a workforce that is not only successful but truly fulfilled.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Navigating Diverse Expectations of Inter-generational Workforces

Leave a reply

Navigating Diverse Expectations of Inter-generational Workforces

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s dynamic professional landscape, organizations are increasingly characterized by a unique composition of inter-generational workforces. This fusion of Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z in the workplace offers immense potential for innovation, provided that leaders understand and navigate the diverse expectations and work styles inherent to each generation.

Diverse Expectations in the Workplace

Each generation brings its distinctive perspective shaped by the world events, cultural shifts, and technological advancements they have experienced. Here are some condensed insights into the expectations and characteristics of each generation:

Baby Boomers: Value job security, loyalty, and are often motivated by position and titles.
Generation X: Appreciate work-life balance, are independent, and often act as a bridge between older and younger employees.
Millennials: Seek purpose-driven work, value collaboration, and prioritize digital communication.
Generation Z: Are digital natives, expect rapid feedback, and value diversity and inclusion highly.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Tech Innovators Inc.

Tech Innovators Inc. is a rapidly growing technology firm with a vibrant mix of employees across generations. The company noticed a frequent clash between the collaborative approach of millennials and the more structured communication style preferred by Baby Boomers.

To address this, the company initiated a mentorship program where employees from different generations were paired together. The aim was two-fold: older employees gained insights into digital collaboration tools, while younger employees learned about industry history and strategic planning.

The result was a harmonious blend of traditional experience and modern efficiency. Productivity saw a notable increase, and employee satisfaction metrics rose by 20%. The mentorship program became a cornerstone in fostering an inclusive and resilient workplace culture.

Case Study 2: GreenFuture Energy

GreenFuture Energy, a leader in sustainable solutions, faced challenges with inter-generational team dynamics, primarily the differing expectations around feedback and professional development.

In response, GreenFuture implemented regular “feedback forums” where real-time feedback was encouraged across all levels. Each forum was designed to be a safe space promoting open communication, facilitated by trained mediators to maintain respect and constructive dialogue.

This initiative empowered Gen Z employees to express their innovative ideas and receive guidance, while Baby Boomers and Gen X provided context and depth through their rich experience. As a consequence, team initiatives became more innovative and execution rates improved by 35%.

Strategies for Navigating Diverse Expectations

To harness the potential of an inter-generational workforce, organizations must adopt intentional strategies:

Foster Open Communication: Encourage transparent dialogues where all generations feel heard and valued.
Promote Inclusive Leadership: Develop leadership teams that reflect the generational diversity of the workforce.
Provide Tailored Professional Development: Offer training programs that cater to the distinct learning and career growth needs of each generation.
Leverage Technology: Use digital tools to bridge communication gaps and streamline collaboration across diverse teams.

Conclusion

Successfully managing an inter-generational workforce requires more than understanding generational stereotypes. It demands a genuine commitment to building a culture of inclusivity and adaptability, where diverse expectations are not just acknowledged but leveraged for organizational growth. Through strategic initiatives and open-minded leadership, companies can transform potential inter-generational hurdles into opportunities for innovation and enhanced team synergy.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Unlearning and Relearning Are Keys to Innovative Thinking

Leave a reply

Unlearning and Relearning Are Keys to Innovative Thinking

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the fast-paced world of the 21st century, the ability to think creatively and innovate is more critical than ever. However, a significant barrier often stands in the way of innovation: existing knowledge and beliefs. While knowledge is undoubtedly powerful, it can also create blind spots. Thus, the challenges of unlearning outdated concepts and relearning new approaches are essential to overcome for fostering innovation. Let’s delve into the art and science of unlearning and relearning, and explore how they serve as keys to innovative thinking.

The Process of Unlearning

Unlearning is the process of letting go of old information or approaches that no longer serve us. It is not so much about forgetting but about stepping back from ingrained habits and assumptions. This requires an open mind and a willingness to challenge one’s own mental models. To unlearn, individuals and organizations must cultivate curiosity and humility, recognizing that what worked yesterday may not work today.

Embracing Relearning

Relearning goes hand in hand with unlearning. It involves adopting new perspectives, skills, and ideas that are more relevant to current challenges and future opportunities. Relearning equips individuals with the ability to adapt to emerging trends and technologies. It fosters a mindset of continuous growth and reinforces the importance of lifelong learning. By embracing relearning, we lay the groundwork for developing innovative solutions.

Case Study: Kodak – A Lesson in Unlearning

Kodak’s Missed Opportunity

Once a giant in the photography industry, Kodak provides a stark lesson in the importance of unlearning. In the early 1970s, Kodak engineer Steve Sasson invented the first digital camera. But the innovative idea was shelved due to the company’s strong belief in traditional film photography.

Kodak’s failure to unlearn its reliance on film technology and embrace digital photography eventually led to its downfall. By clinging to existing knowledge and market dominance, Kodak missed the opportunity to lead an emerging digital revolution. The case of Kodak highlights the critical need for companies to unlearn outdated business models to innovate and thrive.

Case Study: Microsoft’s Cultural Shift

Microsoft’s Transformation

In stark contrast, Microsoft’s story is one of successful unlearning and relearning. Under the leadership of Satya Nadella, who became CEO in 2014, Microsoft embarked on a cultural transformation that emphasized ‘growth mindset’ and innovation.

Nadella encouraged employees to unlearn combative work habits and embraced a culture of collaboration. He recognized the need to pivot towards cloud computing and artificial intelligence, investing heavily in these fields and shifting the focus away from the traditional Windows-centric model.

This shift resulted in a reinvigorated Microsoft that regained market leadership and opened new revenue streams. By unlearning its past and relearning new business strategies, Microsoft exemplified how adaptation and innovation can significantly alter a company’s trajectory.

Strategies for Unlearning and Relearning

Cultivate Curiosity: Encourage a culture where questions are welcomed, and continual learning is embraced. Curiosity leads to an openness that is fundamental to unlearning old paradigms.
Challenge Assumptions: Foster an environment where assumptions can be questioned and debated. This involves promoting diversity of thought and encouraging feedback.
Create Safe Spaces for Experimentation: Allow team members to explore new ideas without fear of failure. Learning from both successes and mistakes fosters a culture of innovation.
Invest in Continuous Learning: Provide learning opportunities that promote skill development in new areas. Encourage employees to stay up to date with industry trends and emerging technologies.

In conclusion, unlearning and relearning are crucial processes in cultivating an innovative mindset. They require individuals and organizations to embrace change, challenge old assumptions, and stay agile in the face of rapid transformation. By following the examples set by companies like Microsoft and learning from the missteps of others like Kodak, we can unlock new avenues of growth and creativity. It is through continuous learning and adaptation that we will find the keys to tomorrow’s innovations.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

You Must Be Comfortable with Being Uncomfortable

3 Replies

You Must Be Comfortable with Being Uncomfortable

GUEST POST from Janet Sernack

It’s been a tough two and a half for everyone since the COVID-19 crisis began. Some of us have been hit very, very hard, by the impact of the pandemic exacerbated by the rate of exponential change and now, by the impact of the conflict in Ukraine.

As result, many of us are feeling overwhelmed and exhausted and languishing in varying states of anxiety and discomfort. Some of us are struggling with “not knowing” how to deal with the extreme uncertainty existing within our business and personal environments, whilst many of us are optimistically seeking to prepare and manage for what might possibly come next.

At the same time, many of us are seeking collaborative partnerships to support us and explore options for keeping both ourselves, our people, and teams engaged in moving forward creatively in a constantly changing world. Where both the work environment and the nature of work are in a state of flux, where we are going through exceptional and extraordinary changes, and, where to both survive and thrive, we need to get comfortable with being uncomfortable with it all.

Safely stepping into the unknown

This creates an opening and a threshold to partner with others in resourceful and creative ways to support them, to safely and bravely step into the unknown.

To perceive this unique moment in time as an opportunity for growth, shape-shifting, and change – by empowering and equipping them to cautiously abandon and exit their comfort zones and get comfortable with being uncomfortable. Because the patterned worlds of our “business as usual” existences, which traditionally kept us get comfortable and calm, and helped us stay emotionally and mentally even, free from anxiety and worry to a great degree, are no longer certain, predictable or stable.

Where constant and accelerating change, coupled with uncertainty are the harsh realities of today, and of tomorrow, in the decade emerging as one of both disruption and transformation.

Impact of our neurological survival mechanisms

As humans, we have an internal need for consistency, represented by our internally mapped, largely unconscious, neurological comfort zones, our own unique places for getting comfortable, and amenable to what we habitually do. When we experience cognitive dissonance, in an extremely uncertain and disruptive operating environment, we unconsciously encounter apparent inconsistencies between what is really happening and what we believe to be really true.

As result, we often, mostly unconsciously, slip into our auto-pilot range of varied aggressive and passive defensive, reactive responses: including avoidance, denial, anger, opposition, and resistance to change. Often described as the “retreat, freeze, or take flight or fight” reactions to what is “seemingly” going on. This is because we distort and generalize our thoughts or feelings into believing that have no control over events. Which is a normal and natural neurological, yet primitive, survival mechanism that enables us to cope with the situation.

However, when we operate this way, we lose our personal power and question our abilities to shape and manifest the outcomes we want, or feel we lack the ability to influence others or constructively impact our environments.

Resistance is futile

Manifesting as feelings of discomfort, most of us will do anything to move away from – because we want to avoid pervasive, visceral, challenging thoughts and feelings, derived from our conflicting beliefs and values. Our auto-responses or neurological urges to remove the discomfort, and typically keep us in our comfort zones, where we procrastinate, make excuses, shift into denial, avoidance, and justification, resulting ultimately, in immobilisation and inaction.

The outcome is that we may feel paralysed, and become inert, inhibiting and preventing us from developing the mindsets, behaviours, and actions required to thrive in the future. Where our only “new normal” will depend on our abilities to flow with constant change, unpredictability, instability, and uncertainty and get comfortable with being uncomfortable.

Hidden costs of resistance

Resistance to change prevents us from:

Adapting to the current and future environment is not the survival of the fittest, it’s he or she who is the most adaptive, who ultimately survives, and thrives!

Exploiting this moment in time as an opportunity and threshold to improve our confidence, competence, and emotional capacity to effectively transition through the range of professional and personal crises, brought on by uncertainty and disruption.

Exploring possibilities and unleashing opportunities available in this moment in time as a turning point to learn and grow, as a coach, leader, or team.

Strategizing in the new global, hybrid, and virtual work environment to improve, competitiveness, productivity, and innovation grow our practices and help our members expand their roles, and grow their teams and businesses.

Breaking down silos that add to many of our member’s current states of disconnection and loneliness, and inhibit connection and collaboration.

Creating permission, tolerance, and safety for members to safely download and let go of their fears and anxieties, share their negativity and pessimism, fears of failure, and co-create positivity and optimism towards thriving in an uncertain future, together.

Embracing the new world of digitisation and experimentation, from implementing change, enhancing individual and organisational agility, and developing the mindsets, behaviours, and skills to be comfortable in constantly changing contexts.

What can we do about it?

Being agile and adaptive

In normal times, creating a comfort zone is a healthy adaptation for controlling much of our lives. Yet having the boldness, bravery, and courage in extreme uncertainty, to step up and out of our comfort zones helps us be agile and adaptive in transitioning, growing, and transforming through the enormous challenges, disruptions, and adversities many of us are confronting.

Entering the learning zone

In fact, once we do take the first baby steps out of our comfort zones and into our fear zone (fear of loss, blame, shame, envy, punishment, retribution, opposition, being controlled, humiliation, being envied or made wrong) we can safely enter the learning zone. Being in the Learning Zone is the first stopping point toward generating creative energy and expanding our comfort zones.

Facing the fear

Doing this builds the foundations for being more comfortable with being uncomfortable by facing, feeling, acknowledging, and letting go of some of our deepest fears by dealing with them rationally and realistically, with empathy and compassion, and without bias and distortion.

Reducing our levels of anxiety

By withdrawing, discerning, and deciding to let go of the need to be constantly in charge and in control and be willing to enter the Growth Zone, where everything that happens is a resource for being tolerant, and accepting, of the possibilities for making positive change.

Stepping into being comfortable

This is a great opportunity to co-create a new playbook for ourselves, our people, and their teams by enabling and empowering the mindset shift to the Growth Zone, to transform cognitive dissonance, and use it as the creative tensions toward being comfortable with being uncomfortable.

This involves engaging in a set of consistent and regular practices, to build and support a willingness to embrace change, disruption, and uncertainty, to take on even the impossible.

Hit your Pause Button: retreat from activity, get grounded in stillness and silence, and be fully present to your energetic state. Be mindful and pay deep attention to recognise your patterns, attune to what is really going on, and get unhooked from any internal chatter, stories, and unconscious default patterns.

Label Your Thoughts and Emotions: be fully present and get connected to yourself and to others you are interacting with, feel the feeling, knowing that it is transient.

Acknowledge and Accept: allow yourself to accept and embrace the range of feelings, be empathic, compassionate, and open-hearted with yourself and with others.

Detach from and Observe your Thoughts and Emotions: be willing to create and sustain an open mind, be inquisitive and curious, explore the non-judgemental space between your feelings and how to effectively respond to them.

Identify difficult feelings: as you experience them and find more appropriate ways of responding instead of reacting, be willing to become a “detached observer”.

Be emotionally agile: learn to see yourself as the operating system, filled with possibilities, knowing that you are more than one part of it and flow with it

Be courageous and brave: challenge the status quo, and your habitual thinking, feeling, and decision-making habits and build your confidence to reboot, consistently disrupt yourself and be comfortable with being uncomfortable.

Be imaginative and creative: reimagine your most desirable future state, be optimistic and positive about choosing the best ways to reset, and walk your way forward into the unknown.

Focusing your attention and being intentional

Being comfortable with being uncomfortable, enables us to re-think creates openings and thresholds for developing 21st-century superpowers, limitless possibilities for change, growth, learning, and innovation.

By empowering us to respond positively to uncertainty, and dynamic change that respects and engages people’s values and humanity, in co-creative and innovative ways that improve the quality of people’s lives in ways they value, appreciate, and cherish.

An opportunity to learn more

Find out about our learning products and tools, including The Coach for Innovators Certified Program, a collaborative, intimate, and deep personalized innovation coaching and learning program, supported by a global group of peers over 9-weeks, starting Tuesday, May 4, 2022.

It is a blended and transformational change and learning program that will give you a deep understanding of the language, principles, and applications of an ecosystem focus, human-centric approach, and emergent structure (Theory U) to innovation, and upskill people and teams and develop their future fitness, within your unique context.

Image Credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.