Category Archives: Innovation

600 Free Innovation, Transformation and Design Quote Slides

600 Innovation, Transformation and Design Quote Slides on Innovation, Change and Design

Free Downloads for Keynote Speeches, Presentations and Workshops

Looking for a compelling quote for a keynote speech, workshop or presentation on any of these topics?

  • Innovation
  • Digital Transformation
  • Design
  • Change
  • Creativity
  • Leadership
  • Design Thinking

I’m flattered that people have been quoting my keynote speeches and my first two books Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire and Charting Change.

So, I’m making some of my favorite quotes available from myself and other thought leaders in a fun, visual, easily shareable format.

I’ve been publishing them on Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.

But now you can download twelve (12) volumes of fifty (50) quote posters, for a total of 600, for FREE from my store:

You can add them all to your shopping cart at once and download them for FREE.

Print them, share them on social media, or use them in your presentations, keynote speeches or workshops.

They are all Adobe PDF’s and the best way to add them to your presentation is to:

  1. Put the PDF into FULL SCREEN MODE
  2. Take a screenshot
  3. Paste it into your presentation
  4. Crop it and adjust the size to your liking
  5. Change the background color of the slide to a suitable color (if necessary)

Contact me with your favorite innovation, design thinking, change, transformation, or design quotes and I’ll consider adding them to my library of future downloads.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Fun Ways to Foster Innovation with Gamification

Fun Ways to Foster Innovation with Gamification

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s rapidly changing business landscape, fostering innovation is not just advantageous — it’s essential. But how can organizations kindle this spirit of innovation in a way that is engaging and sustainable? Enter gamification: the art of applying game-design elements in non-game contexts. By infusing work with fun, gamification has the power to drive motivation, encourage creativity, and ultimately, foster innovation. This article explores how two companies successfully employed gamification to boost their innovation efforts.

Case Study 1: Microsoft’s Language Quality Game

Microsoft faced a challenge that is common to global technology companies: ensuring the quality and consistency of translated content across different languages. The process of identifying and fixing errors in translations can be tedious and time-consuming. To combat this, Microsoft implemented a gamified approach known as the “Language Quality Game.”

The game involved users and employees who could earn points, badges, and visual accolades by identifying errors or suggesting improvements to translation strings. Not only did this encourage more participation, but it also created a sense of competition and engagement among users and employees. As a result, Microsoft was able to improve the accuracy of its translations while also fostering a sense of ownership and contribution among its linguistically diverse user base.

Case Study 2: SAP’s Quiz-Based Idea Competition

SAP, a leader in enterprise software solutions, faced the internal challenge of stimulating innovative ideas from its global workforce. To tackle this, SAP turned to gamification by creating a quiz-based idea competition known as “InnoJam 48.” Participants were grouped into teams and tasked with solving real-world challenges by creating innovative software solutions within 48 hours.

The incorporation of gamified elements like quizzes, real-time feedback, and virtual leaderboards infused a competitive spirit into the event and motivated employees to put forward their best ideas. This approach not only inspired creative problem-solving but also cultivated a culture of continuous innovation. The best ideas were recognized and rewarded, encouraging more employees to participate in future events.

Conclusion

Gamification has emerged as a powerful tool for driving innovation in organizations. By leveraging the intrinsic human desire for fun, competition, and achievement, companies like Microsoft and SAP have successfully harnessed the power of gamification to foster innovation. It effectively transforms mundane tasks and challenges into engaging, rewarding experiences. As businesses strive to innovate in ever-evolving markets, gamification presents itself as an enticing strategy to consider.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Leader’s Role in Innovation

From Vision to Execution

The Leader's Role in Innovation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the rapidly evolving business landscape, innovation is the bridge that connects customer needs with future-ready solutions. Yet, moving from vision to execution is often fraught with challenges. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I believe that the success of this transformation hinges on effective leadership. Leaders play a pivotal role in navigating the complexities of innovation, driving the alignment of their teams, and ensuring the diligent execution of ideas. In this article, we will delve into the responsibilities of leaders during the innovation journey and illustrate these points with two insightful case studies.

The Leader’s Role in Innovation

Leading innovation isn’t just about having a great idea or setting ambitious goals. It requires a strategic approach and a deep commitment to fostering a culture of innovation. Leaders must be visionaries and executors, guiding their teams through the sometimes uncertain terrain of taking an idea to market. This involves:

  • Creating a Shared Vision: Leaders must articulate a clear and compelling vision that inspires and aligns the team towards a common purpose.
  • Fostering a Culture of Creativity: Encouraging experimentation, accepting failures as learning opportunities, and creating an enabling environment where creativity can thrive.
  • Empowering Teams: Empowering team members with the autonomy and resources needed to innovate effectively.
  • Ensuring Strategic Alignment: Ensuring that innovation efforts align with overall business strategies and customer needs.
  • Facilitating Cross-functional Collaboration: Breaking down silos to enable diverse teams to collaborate and co-create effectively.
  • Measuring and Iterating: Establishing metrics for success and being agile in iterating solutions based on feedback and results.

Case Study 1: Procter & Gamble’s Innovation Factory

Procter & Gamble (P&G) is renowned for its methodical approach to innovation. Guided by leaders who understand the value of systematic innovation, P&G built an ‘Innovation Factory’—a scalable platform that connects internal and external innovators to collaboratively solve problems. Leaders at P&G shifted their role from decision-makers to facilitators who guide and support these collaborations.

Key Takeaways:

  • P&G’s leadership encouraged open innovation by breaking down the traditional boundaries of R&D, allowing new ideas to flow in from different industries and cultures.
  • Their leaders empowered employees with the tools and resources necessary to explore innovative projects, carefully balancing guidance with creative freedom.
  • Through constant iteration and a focus on unmet consumer needs, P&G’s leadership ensures that innovation is strategically aligned with its business goals.

Case Study 2: Tesla’s Visionary Leadership

Tesla, under the leadership of Elon Musk, has distinguished itself as a leading innovator in the automotive industry. Musk’s leadership style demonstrates a clear vision combined with calculated risk-taking, propelling Tesla from an ambitious startup into a market leader.

Key Takeaways:

  • Elon Musk’s vision for sustainable energy and transport is deeply embedded in Tesla’s mission, energizing employees and stakeholders alike.
  • Tesla’s leadership embraces an iterative development process, dubbed ‘rapid iteration,’ that challenges traditional automotive development cycles.
  • Musk empowers his teams through high expectations and innovative work environments, ensuring that they are aligned with Tesla’s vision even when facing substantial challenges.

Conclusion

As seen in the cases of Procter & Gamble and Tesla, effective leadership is critical in the journey of innovation from vision to execution. By creating a shared vision, fostering a culture of creativity, and empowering their teams, leaders can overcome the obstacles inherent in the innovation process. As organizations navigate the complexities of the modern world, those with leaders who inspire, guide, and execute on innovative visions will be the ones to thrive.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovative Tools for Enhancing User Research

Innovative Tools for Enhancing User Research

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the fast-paced world of innovation, understanding the needs and behaviors of users has never been more crucial. As organizations strive to create products and services that truly resonate, effective user research becomes indispensable. Fortunately, a suite of innovative tools is now available to enhance the way we conduct user research. This article explores some of these tools and illustrates their impact through real-world case studies.

Innovative Tools for User Research

In the digital age, a plethora of user research tools has emerged, offering user researchers unprecedented insights into consumer behavior. Among these tools, augmented reality (AR) user testing, AI-driven sentiment analysis, and real-time collaboration platforms have gained prominence. These tools facilitate deeper understanding and engagement with users, often leading to breakthroughs in product and service design.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: XYZ Inc. Leverages Augmented Reality for User Testing

XYZ Inc., a tech company focused on smart home solutions, incorporated augmented reality (AR) into their user research strategy. By utilizing AR for user testing, they allowed participants to interact with virtual prototypes of their new home-automation system in a realistic environment. This approach not only reduced the costs associated with physical prototyping but also provided users with a more intuitive experience.

Through AR, XYZ Inc. gathered valuable feedback on user interactions with interfaces, uncovering usability issues that traditional methods would have overlooked. As a result, the company was able to refine its user experience design significantly before launching the product, leading to higher customer satisfaction and adoption rates.

Case Study 2: ABC Corp. Utilizes AI-driven Sentiment Analysis

ABC Corp., a financial services firm, implemented AI-driven sentiment analysis to interpret user feedback on their mobile banking app. By integrating AI algorithms that processed thousands of feedback entries, they were able to detect not only the content but also the emotional tone of user comments.

This tool provided insights that went beyond what conventional surveys and interviews could capture. ABC Corp. discovered specific pain points related to security and navigation and identified that sentiments were particularly negative among users aged 50 and above. Armed with this knowledge, they prioritized user-friendly designs and security enhancements tailored to meet the needs of this demographic, resulting in a significant uptick in positive user feedback and app engagement.

Conclusion

The integration of innovative tools in user research is transforming the landscape of user-centered design. As illustrated by the case studies of XYZ Inc. and ABC Corp., adopting new technologies such as AR user testing and AI-driven sentiment analysis can lead to profound insights and significantly enhance product design and user satisfaction. Embracing these tools not only strengthens the research process but also places organizations at the forefront of innovation, ultimately fostering a deeper connection with the end-users.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Bureaucracy and Politics versus Innovation

Bureaucracy and Politics versus Innovation

Innovation in military hardware is really hard.

I wanted to call this article “Corruption versus Innovation” but I sailed back from the precipice to a more forgiving title to give the government and military contractors the benefit of the doubt that the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program – aka Little Crappy Ships – was not corporate welfare but merely a poorly executed military contract.

Back in 2004 the Bush administration decided it wanted to increase military spending.

One of the ways they decided to do this was to initiate a new shipbuilding program that benefited Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics. The initial phase of the project called for two ships of each design to be built at an estimated cost of $220 million each. The initial phase of this suspect shipbuilding program went so poorly that congress canceled the second ship each company was scheduled to build and re-opened bidding.

The government pushed for fixed price contracting, and despite agreeing to a fixed price of $432-437 million each, the first ship set sail at a price of $637 million and the second at a whopping $704 million. This for a ship that was initially envisioned to only need a crew of forty sailors (eight officers and 32 enlisted) to operate. This was later changed to a crew of 73 sailors and 20 airmen to operate helicopters, UAV’s or other special equipment.

After beginning the LCS program in 2004, it wasn’t until 2013 that the initial LCS achieved its first deployment – to Singapore. That’s nine years from initiation to product launch. Think about how much has changed in the last nine years – we’ll come back to this point later.

The continuing poor performance of both the program (never-ending cost overruns), and the ship itself, forced the US Navy to reduce its orders from 55 of the ships to 32. Despite this reduction in the number of ships, the Navy chose to still take delivery of all 120 of the helicopters designed to pair with the ships, deeming it more expensive to cancel the contract for the excess helicopters than to go ahead and take delivery.

You can probably see now why I was going to call this article “Corruption versus Innovation” as the billions of dollars siphoned from the taxpayers to the military contractors and their shareholders pile up.

What’s worse, not only have the ships proven to be THREE TIMES more expensive to acquire than advertised, but they break down all the time and cost nearly as much to operate annually as an Arleigh-Burke Destroyer AND they have still yet to deploy their mine countermeasure and anti-submarine warfare capabilities.

The situation is so bad that the Navy is abandoning the program and looking to replace its little crappy ships (LCS) with a new Frigate program – the FFG (X) to be constructed by an Italian shipbuilding firm.

So, what went wrong?

Through the eyes of both a U.S. Navy Veteran, and as an innovation professional, here are my thoughts about how the U.S. Government can require its contractors to leverage more innovation best practices in their provision of services on behalf of the American people. Here are five places to start:

1. Pick the Right Time Horizon for Your Design Challenge

One of the biggest mistakes that organizations make is not consider how long it takes to develop, launch and market a new product or service without considering how an identified customer insight might change over that timeframe. For example, if it takes you two years to launch a new product and you’re developing that product based on a customer insight identified today, there is a chance that two years from now the customer may no longer value the key elements of the solution you’re designing. So, you must make sure that you’re designing against a customer insight that will still be relevant at the end of your product development and launch timeline.

Innovating for the Future Present

For more, see my article Are You Innovating for the Past or the Future?

2. Make Sure You’re Solving a Problem Worth Solving

It is really easy to latch on to a single problem and decide to solve it. But is it the right problem to solve?

Smart organizations don’t jump to problem solving too soon, but instead start with problem finding in a divergent manner before converging via problem prioritization, then diverge again in a problem deep dive and finally converge into a problem summary and a research brief focused on a carefully chosen problem worth solving.

Preparing to Solve the Right Problem

For more, see my article Picking a Problem Worth Solving From a Sea of Problems

3. Identify Potential Fatal Flaws

No idea is perfect, and so when you can identify the potential fatal flaws or the high hurdles that have to be overcome, you can challenge them, you can solve for them, you can unleash the passion of your team on trying to find a way around them.

The fatal flaws are always there, and the wise innovator doesn’t ignore them or assume that they will overcome them at some point in the future, but instead invests energy upfront into both trying to identify the fatal flaws of their idea and into identifying whether they can isolate the solutions before moving the idea forward.

For more, see my article Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fatal Flaws

4. Create an Experimentation Strategy and a Plan for Learning Fast

When it comes to innovation, it is not as important whether you fail fast or fail slow or whether you fail at all, but how fast you learn. And make no mistake, you don’t have to fail to innovate (although there are always some obstacles along the way). With the right approach to innovation you can learn quickly from failures AND successes.

The key is to pursue your innovation efforts as a discrete set of experiments designed to learn certain things and instrumenting each project phase in such a way that the desired learning is achieved.

The central question should always be:

“What do we hope to learn from this effort?”

The Experiment Canvas

My Experiment Canvas is a great free tool you can download from this web site to help you design and execute a series of carefully selected experiments to help you get the right learning and to help identify early on whether or not you can realistically solve for the potential fatal flaws – as early as possible – while investments are low.

For more, see my article Don’t Fail Fast – Learn Fast and download your free Experiment Canvas poster to print or to use as a background to lock down and put virtual sticky notes on top of in online whiteboarding tools like Miro, Mural, LucidSpark or Microsoft Whiteboard.

5. Design for Modularity to Reduce Obsolescence

The LCS was promised to be a modular warship capable of performing multiple missions, but the contractors have failed to deliver on this promise.

It takes a really long time to put a new ship design to sea and into service. So, if you get it wrong, like with the LCS program, it will be many more years before you can replace a faulty design with a new design.

We rarely successfully predict the future, so it is important to design in the capability to adapt solutions as they are developed to match emerging realities. Otherwise, you can end up designing a solution for a problem that goes away.

To reduce the chances of designing a new ship for a mission that may no longer be needed by the time it is put to sea, it is imperative that each ship is designed to be intentionally modular. It is imperative that each ship is designed as a platform of platforms.

The automobile industry has gotten really good at designing in this way. Different trim levels have different stereo options, for example, or a dealer can install a spoiler or a luggage rack pretty easily if a customer desires it.

Designing with modularity and upgradeability in mind to change out key components to different mission needs that may emerge over time or new technologies that may create new or enhanced capabilities, is an incredibly powerful way to extend the usefulness and lifespan of each new maritime defense hull.

Conclusion

The U.S. Navy is in a quandary about what to do with the Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) it already has.

So much so that it has reached out to fleet commanders to inquire what missions the ships should be deployed against – according to Naval Surface Forces Vice Adm. Roy Kitchener.

The Navy should consider opening up their queries for help even wider, perhaps to the global innovation community.

But, with that said, as a U.S. Navy veteran I think the perception of the success or failure of this program would be seen much differently if they had successfully deployed the Anti-Mine Countermeasure and Anti-Submarine Warfare capabilities BEFORE the Surface Warfare capabilities.

Frigates and Destroyers are much more capable surface warfare platforms, and in hindsight the billions of dollars wasted on this program could have been much better spent for the benefit of the American people.

So, I hope that military contractors and the U.S. Government will improve their ability to deliver increased value at a decreased price as they pursue future shipbuilding programs and leverage some of the innovation best practices above.

Grabbing a copy of Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire would also be a great place to start.

Go Navy!

Image credit: Wikimedia Commons (ship photo)
All other images: Braden Kelley (All Rights Reserved)

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Overcoming Common Challenges in Innovation Measurement

Overcoming Common Challenges in Innovation Measurement

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Innovation is both an art and a science, requiring an ability to measure progress and impact accurately. Yet, many organizations struggle with this aspect of innovation management. With the right insights and tools, these challenges can be transformed into opportunities for growth.

Understanding the Challenges

At its core, innovation measurement is about assessing not only the outcomes but also the process of generating new ideas. Common challenges include defining relevant metrics, addressing the subjectivity of success criteria, and the difficulty in quantifying intangible benefits.

Case Study 1: TechCorp’s Innovation Metric Overhaul

TechCorp, a leading technology company, faced difficulties in linking their innovation activities with overall business performance. Their existing metrics focused too heavily on short-term financial returns, ignoring longer-term strategic value. As a result, many potentially groundbreaking projects were starved of resources too early in their development.

To address this, TechCorp adopted a holistic innovation measurement framework. They introduced a balanced scorecard approach, incorporating non-financial measures such as customer satisfaction, employee engagement, and patent activity. Over the next two years, the company witnessed a 25% increase in successful project transitions from development to market, as well as improved alignment of innovation efforts with long-term strategic goals.

Case Study 2: InnovateSoft’s Journey to Quantifying Intangibles

InnovateSoft, a software development firm, struggled with capturing the intangible benefits of their innovation programs, such as brand reputation and knowledge sharing. These benefits were acknowledged qualitatively but lacked quantitative support, making it difficult to justify spending to stakeholders.

InnovateSoft tackled this challenge by developing an “innovation impact scorecard” that included metrics for brand mentions, industry recognition, and internal knowledge transfer sessions. The introduction of these new metrics allowed InnovateSoft to visibly connect their innovation practices with market presence and internal culture enrichment. As a result, the company gained increased budget approvals and, crucially, experienced an uplift in employee morale and creativity.

Concluding Thoughts

Measuring innovation is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor, but the success stories of TechCorp and InnovateSoft demonstrate that with the right framework and commitment, the inherent challenges can be effectively navigated. Organizations must be willing to adapt their measurement approaches to align more closely with their unique strategic objectives while embracing both qualitative and quantitative metrics.

Ultimately, mastering innovation measurement empowers organizations to not only track and report progress but also to foster a culture of innovation that is sustainable and impactful.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Teaching Old Fish New Tricks

Teaching Fish New Tricks

We used to assume that the world was flat.

We used to assume that the sun orbited around the earth.

We used to assume that it was impossible to go faster than the speed of sound.

These assumptions were all challenged and proved to be wrong, fundamentally extending the boundaries of potential innovation and exploration in the decades that followed.

Challenging orthodoxies or questioning your assumptions is one of the key techniques to use with your innovation teams to uncover new insights to form the seeds of future innovation.

This isn’t always easy to do, and in workshops it can be a challenge to put people in the right frame of mind for questioning assumptions and challenging orthodoxies.

I find that having a stable of short videos can help in setting the stage for the very important innovation work.

Now, let’s have a look at one of my new favorite assumption-challenging videos…

Who says you can’t teach old fish new tricks?

Yes, I said fish, not dog – which challenges an orthodoxy in and of itself.

I was intrigued to hear recently that scientists in Israel have managed to teach goldfish how to drive a car.

Don’t believe me?

Check out the video:

Gradually, we are finding out that humans aren’t as special as we like to believe.

We’ve learned that trees can communicate via root systems, research is progressing into plant sentience and yes apparently, goldfish can be taught to drive.

Now that you’ve seen this video, you can now see that the assumption that fish can’t navigate vehicles through physical space – is incorrect.

What other assumptions do we make about goldfish and other living creatures that might be incorrect.

How might we set up experiments to test these assumptions?

What are some of your favorite short videos to put people in the right mindset to challenge orthodoxies and question assumptions?

Add them to the comments!

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Four Innovation Ecosystem Building Blocks

Four Innovation Ecosystem Building Blocks

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

It’s hard to find anyone who wouldn’t agree that Microsoft’s 2001 antitrust case was a disaster for the company. Not only did it lose the case, but it wasted time, money and—perhaps most importantly—focus on its existing businesses, which could have been far better deployed on new technologies like search and mobile.

Today, Microsoft is a much different organization. Rather than considering open source software a cancer, it now says it loves Linux. Its cloud business is growing like wildfire and it is partnering widely to develop new quantum computers. What was previously a rapacious monopolist, is now an enthusiastic collaborator.

That’s no accident. Today, we need to compete in an ecosystem-driven world in which nobody, not even a firm as big and powerful as Microsoft, can go it alone. Power no longer comes from the top of value chains, but emanates from the center of networks. That means that strategy needs to shift from dominating industries to building collaborative ecosystems.

1. Connect to Startups

In its heyday, Microsoft enthusiastically followed Michael Porter’s five forces model. It saw threats coming not only from direct competitors, but also suppliers, customers, substitute products and new market entrants. Startups, in particular, were targeted for either acquisition or destruction if they were seen as posing a potential threat.

Today, however, Microsoft actively supports startups. Take, for example, its quantum development effort, in which it is partnering with more than a dozen entrepreneurial companies. These firms also get free access to Microsoft technologies, such as its Azure cloud platform and go-to-market resources and advice, through its Microsoft for Startups program.

Another approach that many firms take is corporate VC programs which actively invest in promising new companies. Unlike a typical investor, corporations bring a wealth of market and technical expertise, can help with things like distribution, supply chain management and marketing acumen. Corporations, for their part, get far more insight into new technologies than they could as an operating company.

Scott Lenet, President of Touchdown Ventures, which operates venture funds for corporations, told me that, “Startups thrive on new ideas and big firms know how to scale and improve those ideas. We’ve seen some of our investments really blossom based on that kind of partnership.”

2. Form Ties to the Academic World

When Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy said, “no matter who you are, most of the smartest people work for someone else,” he was explicitly referring to Bill Gates’s assertion that Microsoft was an “IQ monopolist.” Joy’s position was that “It’s better to create an ecology that gets all the world’s smartest people toiling in your garden for your goals. If you rely solely on your own employees, you’ll never solve all your customers’ needs.”

Make no mistake. Innovation is never a single event. It is a process of discovery, engineering and transformation and those three things almost never happen in the same place or at the same time. That’s why the most innovative companies work hard to build links to the best minds in the academic world.

Today Microsoft has an extensive academic program that extends grants to graduate students and faculty members that are pursuing research that is of interest to the company. Google takes it even a step further, inviting dozens of the world’s top minds to work alongside its scientists and engineers for a sabbatical year.

Microsoft and Google are, of course, firms with enormous resources. However, just about any business can, for example, support the work of a young graduate student or postdoc at a local university. For even a senior researcher to collaborate with your staff is rarely prohibitively expensive. Researchers care far more about genuine support of their work than the size of your investment.

3. Leverage Domain-Specific Consortia

By the mid-1980’s, the American semiconductor industry seemed like it was doomed. Tp respond to what it saw as a national security threat, the American government created SEMATECH in 1986. It was a consortium of government agencies, research institutions and private firms focused on making the industry more competitive. By the mid 1990’s, the US was once again dominating semiconductors.

Any significantly complex technology takes years—and often decades—to develop before it becomes mature enough to engineer into a marketable product. So there is great potential in collaborating, even with competitive firms, in the pre-competitive phase to figure out the basic principles of a nascent technology.

For example, Boeing and Airbus are arch-rivals in aviation, much like DowDupont and BASF are in chemicals. Yet all of these companies, along with many others, collaborate at places like the Composites Institute (IACMI). They do this not out of any altruism, of course, but self-interest, because it is at places like the Composites Institute that they can collaborate with academic scientists, National Labs and startups working in the space.

As technology becomes more complex, domain specific consortia are becoming essential to any ecosystem strategy. The Composites Institute is just one node in the network of Manufacturing Institutes set up under the Obama Administration to support this type of collaboration. In areas ranging from advanced fabrics and biofabrication to additive manufacturing and wide-gap semiconductors, firms large and small are working with scientists to uncover new principles.

And the Manufacturing Institutes are just the start. The Internet of Things Consortium is helping bring computation to the physical world, while the Partnership on AI focuses on artificial intelligence and the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research is helping to develop advanced battery technology. All are open to the largest multinationals and the smallest startups.

4. Move From Hierarchies to Networks

Back in the 90s, when Microsoft still dominated the tech world, markets were still based on linear value chains dominated by one or two industry giants. Yet as I explain in Cascades, we are quickly moving from a world of hierarchies, to one dominated by networks and ecosystems. That changes how we need to develop and grow.

In a hierarchy-driven world, the optimal strategy was to build walls and moats to protect yourself against would-be invaders, which is why Microsoft fought tooth and nail to protect its operating system monopoly. Today, however, industry lines have blurred and technology moves too fast to be able to build effective barriers against disruption.

That’s why today “Microsoft loves Linux”, why it developed an academic program to collaborate with scientists at universities and why it often partners with startups instead of always trying to crush them. The technology being developed today is simply too complex for anyone to go it alone, which is why the only viable strategy is to actively connect to ecosystems of talent, technology and information.

Power today no longer sits at the top of hierarchies, but emanates from the center of ecosystems and you move to the center by widening and deepening connections. Closing yourself by erecting barriers will not protect you. In fact, it is an almost sure-fire way to hasten your demise.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Everyday Innovation

Everyday Innovation

GUEST POST from John Bessant

We’re all innovators, even if we never thought of calling ourselves that…

Here’s a challenge.

Close your eyes and try to visualize an entrepreneur.

There’s a good chance that what you’ve come up with will be one of the usual suspects — Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Jack Ma, perhaps some of the older versions like Steve Jobs or even Thomas Edison. Hopefully there’s a fair number of women represented, players like Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce or Ariana Huffington; after all statistics show that close to half of the entrepreneurs in the world are female.

But there’s an equally good chance that you won’t have come up with some of these characters, though they all have a strong claim to be featured in our ‘entrepreneur’s gallery’. They may not have become trillionaires but they certainly made an impact. People like Margaret Knight, back in the 19th century; a natural born inventor who was famous before she hit her teens for the wooden sledges she’d fashion for local kids. Working in a textile factory she witnessed an awful (but preventable) accident in which a worker was badly injured by a shuttle flying off a loom. It prompted her to develop a safety device to prevent this happening; she succeeded, her idea worked and it was widely adopted by other textile mills in the area. Unfortunately she was too young to hold a patent and in any case had little understanding of the legal mechanics of doing so. A hard lesson — but one which later served her well.

Margaret Knight Patent Illustration

She moved on through a series of jobs which gave her an appreciation of many different technologies and production processes and finally found herself at the Columbia Paper Company. Her job involved folding every paper bag by hand — a slow process and one with a high potential for human error. During her long working day (10 hour shifts, monotonously folding and gluing) she had ample opportunity to think about how to improve the process — and by night she’d sketch out her ideas in the boarding house where she was living. Within six months she’d managed to build a working prototype out of wood which could cut, fold and glue bags each time a crank was turned.

This time she tried to patent her idea, only to find someone had got there first, having stolen her concept. He’d seen the potential in the design and had decided to copy it and pass it off as his own. After all who would believe that a woman factory worker could produce something so clever and complex?

But Margaret Knight was tough as well as clever; she’d kept all her working drawings and was not going to surrender meekly. Although it cost her most of her savings she was vindicated; in 1871 she was granted US Patent 116842, the first woman in the country to hold a patent. It may have been an improvement innovation but its impact was radical. Her invention revolutionized the paper bag industry by replacing the work of thirty people with one machine. It provided the ‘dominant design’ around which others would innovate, and created the model for the paper shopping bags we still use today.

Or how about Betty Nesmith Graham, a single mother working as a secretary in the Dallas headquarters of the Texas Bank. Which meant spending much of her time typing (or to be more precise, correcting the mistakes she’s made by re-typing). In her frustration she wondered if there was a way to cover up the mistakes, somehow magically clean the paper and type over it once again. After all, when she was painting (her hobby when she got time for it) she’d not spend ages rubbing out or throwing away the canvas so she could start again. She’d just paint over what she’d done wrong, fix it, move on.
She began to experiment at home on the kitchen table. Took a small brush, mixed up some egg white and a little of her precious white tempera paint in the kitchen blender. Played around until the consistency felt right, then dipped her smallest water colour brush into the mixture and painted carefully over a line of typing on the polite letter informing her that her phone bill was overdue for payment. The black key strokes faded beneath the white, the page became blank again ready for someone to type a new line on it.

Back at work the next day it didn’t take her long to make another mistake, her fingers overstepping themselves as she tried to type faster. But this time she carefully wound the roller up a few notches, took a nail varnish pot filled with her concoction from her handbag and painted over the mistake. After a couple of minutes she picked up the mistaken page — and saw her mis-typed words erased, the letter ready for her to try again.

That was the birth of what became ‘Liquid Paper’; it wasn’t an easy journey from idea to successful business but by 1979 over 25 million bottles/year were being made and she employed over 200 people. At this high point she decided to sell the (by now very profitable) business to the Gillette Corporation for $47.5million.

Tupperware

Or Brownie Mae Wise, another single mother trying to keep her family afloat and working as a demonstrator for Stanley Home Products, selling door-to-door. They began experimenting with a new idea, hosting demonstration events in people’s houses and she took to it like a natural. Her social skills coupled with her sales gift meant that pretty soon she was the top agent with much of her success coming with a new product the company had just taken on for a client — Tupperware. She pioneered the idea of social marketing, turning the Tupperware party into a model which transformed the Tupperware business and led to her becoming a powerful role model for women of her time. In 1954 she was featured as the first woman on the cover of Business Week magazine.

With examples like these we clearly need to expand our picture of what makes an entrepreneur. We should, for example, add Dr Govindar Venkataswamy who worked all his life as a surgeon in India specializing in cataract treatment; on retirement he set himself the goal of bringing this operation within the reach of the rural poor in his native state of Tamil Nadu. To do so he needed to find a way of bringing down the cost from around $300 in a city hospital to $30, without compromising safety. He found an answer not in the world of healthcare but by adopting ideas from McDonalds, the fast-food business. The model for his Aravind eye care system worked, the average cost of the operation today is $25, it has one of the best safety records in the world and around 15million people can see who would otherwise have gone blind.

Or how about students Andrea Sreshta and Anna Stork who founded Luminaid as a response to the 2010 Haiti earthquake? They realized that there was a requirement for something beyond food, water and basic first-aid supplies — light. For vulnerable communities, access to a safe, waterproof and transportable light source, which can be powered by the sun could be valuable. Accessible lighting provides a sense of security and community; beyond this, light facilitates study into the evening, providing much-needed access to education for disadvantaged children across settings around the world. Since 2010 over 250,000 LuminAID lanterns and chargers have been distributed by major aid agency partners to those in need, 50,000 of which were sponsored directly through their Give Light, Get Light program.

People like them are also change agents, driven by the desire not for money but for impact, making the world a better place.

And what about the quiet unsung heroes who work away in organizations and who come up with new ideas and take them forward — they too qualify as change agents. People like George Laurer, working for IBM in the early 1970s. One Sunday afternoon he walked across the lawn to tell his neighbor Paul McEnroe (who also happened to be his boss) “I didn’t do what you asked.”

What McEnroe had asked for was a circular bullseye optical scanning code which could be printed on labels. This needed to be compatible with the scanners being installed in supermarkets for which IBM was developing technology. But Laurer could see the problem — printed circles in a high speed press risked blurring at the edges and misinformation. So instead he devised his own code, a pattern of vertical stripes, readable even under difficult lighting conditions.

McEnroe told him to go ahead with preparing his presentation for the next day anyway but didn’t exactly offer warm support, telling Laurer “…there’s nothing I can do about it now….you make the presentation but if it’s not accepted it’s going to be your butt not mine”

Fortunately for George — and IBM — the idea was accepted; it was the bar code strip, formally known as the Universal Product Code — UPC — which provides us with a continuing reminder of the power of such ‘quiet innovation’.

Another group we ought to add into our (now very large) community — user innovators. For many people in all walks of life frustration is often the Mother of Invention. They want a solution to a problem which is bugging them and they’re not afraid to experiment and hack their way to a solution which works. Very often they aren’t particularly interested in spreading their ideas more widely but if someone else can benefit then that’s OK. Examples include farmers improvising add-ons and fixes to their equipment or patients and their carers coming up with solutions to make living with chronic disease more comfortable.

For housewife Valerie Gordon-Hunter back in 1947 the frustration was the endless process of washing nappies for her three children and her dream of finding some kind of disposable version. She developed her own solution– the Paddi — made out of old nylon parachutes, tissue wadding and cotton wool which she sewed together at her kitchen table.

At the same time across the Atlantic Marion Donovan came up with the idea of a cover which would stop the contents of a dirty nappy from soiling surrounding clothes or bed linen. Once again the target was reducing the superhuman effort involved in constantly washing clothing; her invention was called the ‘Boater’ because of its resemblance to a boat. It involved a shower curtain as raw material sewn into a pair of pants which, with the addition of snap fasteners to replace safety pins, kept the nappy in place without soiling the surrounding clothes or bed sheets. And she hit on the idea of some kind of absorbent insert which could be disposable — experimenting with various mixes of cotton wool and once again nylon parachute material.

Disposable Diapers

Today’s market for disposable nappies is estimated at around $10bn.

Sometimes it’s a matter of inspired improvisation. On a hot July day in 1904 at the St Louis World’s fair the ice cream seller next to Ernest Hamwi’s waffle stall hit the nightmare scenario — a queue of people wanting ice cream and no dishes left to sell it in. But Ernest came to the rescue — he had the idea of rolling one of his waffles into a cone shape, and one of the great ideas in the food world was born.

Improvisation of this kind is often something which is born out of crisis; it’s useful to remember the Apollo 13 space mission which had the world holding its breath in the aftermath of the radio message “Houston, we’ve had a problem.” At 2am on April 14, 1970 the failure of a major part of the electrical system suddenly put the crew’s lives at risk. With one of its main oxygen tanks ruptured and with the clock ticking away the teams on the ground and in the module had to improvise solutions fast. They needed to secure enough breathable oxygen for three men in a capsule only designed to take two — and so built an air purifier system using plastic covers from their flight plans, plastic bags, some sticky tape and a soggy sock!

The same kind of crisis-driven improvisation led Willem Kalff to develop the world’s first kidney dialysis machine. Because he was working during wartime under Nazi occupation in the Netherlands his was something of a ‘scrapyard challenge’; he built his machine out of salvaged car and washing machine parts, orange juice cans and sausage skins.

It’s the same kind of spirit that led to ‘citizen innovators’ developing a wide range of apps to help deal with the aftermath of the 2010 Haiti earthquake; their solutions included crisis mapping, reuniting displaced families, mobilising an alternative banking system to help distribute aid and crowdsourcing design information to feed 3D printers creating urgently needed medical spare parts.

We could go on but the point is clear. Innovation– creating value from an idea — is something which all sorts of people do in many different contexts. Peter Drucker’s famous comment is helpful here; ‘innovation is what entrepreneurs do’. We’re familiar with the start-up but that’s only one of the many places in which we might find ‘entrepreneurs’ — people who make change happen.

In fact we are all potentially entrepreneurs — think about situations like these in your own life. Standing in a queue and turning over in your mind the thought that ‘there has to be a better way…’ You’re beginning the same kind of mental journey of innovation, frustration prompting you to think of alternative solutions. Or look around your home and list all the little hacks you’ve put in place to solve problems or make life easier. Innovation, once again.

We shouldn’t be surprised; after all this is something human beings have been doing for thousands of years. Our survival as a species rather depended on being able to come up with now solutions to the problem of not being eaten or having enough to eat ourselves. We’re not big or fast — but we do have half a kilogram of grey stuff inside our heads which is pretty useful at coming up with new ideas.

This isn’t just semantics. At a time when we need as much innovation as we can get (never mind trying to survive a pandemic we also have a planet whose future is in considerable doubt unless we change things pretty fast and radically) mobilizing the skills of innovation is an urgent priority. Not for nothing are efforts being made to introduce the core skills of entrepreneurial behavior to everyone from kindergarten kids through to care home residents.

And the good news is that we have learned a lot about what those skills involve; far from entrepreneurs being somehow magically different (like unicorns) we now understand the core elements in the craft. Turning ideas into value is about learning to make a journey and we have a map for that which has been drawn from over 100 years of experience of success (and failure) — a kind of supercharged ‘Trip Advisor’ or Hitchhiker’s Guide.

It still helps to have a growth mindset and plenty of ‘grit’ — being prepared to persevere in the face of obstacles and learning to manage failure as part of the process. But thinking about how to develop our skills as an ‘everyday entrepreneur’ might be a good resolution for kicking off the 2022 new year.

Image credits: Pixabay, USPTO, Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Collaborative Innovation for Social Good

Collaborative Innovation for Social Good

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s interconnected world, the challenges faced by society are multifaceted and demand solutions that are both innovative and inclusive. Collaborative innovation has emerged as a powerful approach to tackle such challenges, harnessing the collective expertise, creativity, and resources of diverse stakeholders. By working together, organizations, governments, and communities can co-create solutions that drive positive social change. This article explores the concept of collaborative innovation for social good and examines two inspiring case studies that demonstrate its potential.

Case Study 1: The Global Vaccine Alliance (Gavi)

Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, represents a quintessential example of collaborative innovation aimed at addressing global health disparities. Founded in 2000, Gavi brings together public and private sectors in a unique partnership model to improve access to vaccines for children in the world’s poorest countries.

By leveraging the strengths of a diverse array of partners—including the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—Gavi has successfully delivered vaccines to over 760 million children, preventing more than 13 million deaths. This collaborative effort showcases the power of aligning cross-sector agendas, sharing resources, and implementing a community-centered approach to achieve a common social good: improving global health outcomes.

Gavi’s success highlights the importance of sustainable financing, innovative supply chains, and data-driven strategies in achieving its mission. Through constant collaboration and adaptation, Gavi has proven that collective effort can overcome the most daunting of societal challenges.

Case Study 2: OpenIDEO’s Challenge Model

OpenIDEO, a collaborative platform created by the global design company IDEO, leverages human-centered design to tackle social issues through inclusive innovation challenges. OpenIDEO’s model invites individuals, organizations, and communities worldwide to contribute ideas and prototype solutions to pressing social challenges, fostering a culture of crowd-powered innovation.

One noteworthy project from OpenIDEO involved a challenge to find innovative solutions for enhancing economic opportunities for refugees. This challenge invited contributions from designers, NGOs, technologists, refugees themselves, and other stakeholders. The collaborative process not only generated a wealth of diverse ideas but also facilitated the formation of partnerships across sectors, leading to scalable impact through the development of job training programs, digital platforms, and supportive policy frameworks.

OpenIDEO’s model emphasizes the importance of iterative prototyping, feedback loops, and inclusive participation, demonstrating how crowdsourcing innovation can spark transformative change and drive social good.

Conclusion

Collaborative innovation for social good is not merely a trend but an essential strategy for addressing the complex challenges facing our global community. As demonstrated by Gavi and OpenIDEO, initiatives that harness the power of collective wisdom and effort can achieve remarkable outcomes. By fostering partnerships, breaking down silos, and embracing inclusivity, we can create solutions that not only meet immediate needs but also promote long-term societal well-being.

To further explore how you can get involved in collaborative innovation for social good, visit OpenIDEO and learn more about Gavi at Gavi’s website. Together, we can drive positive change and make a significant difference in the world.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.