Category Archives: Creativity

Virtual Keynotes and Virtual Workshops Now Available

Virtual Keynotes and Virtual Workshops Now Available

The coronavirus (COVID-19) has inflicted untold pain and disruption on individuals, families, businesses and economies all around the world.

But, now that we all are obtaining a clearer understanding of what it means to live and work amongst the reality of COVID-19, people are going back to work (even if still remotely) and companies are turning their attention increasingly back to the future.

Now is the time for event producers and innovation leaders to restart their content pipelines to inspire and empower audiences and employees to stoke their innovation bonfires, plan their transformation journeys, or chart their course for change.

People are more ready than ever to engage with virtual content, and you can save on travel expenses at the same time. Whether we’re speaking about inspirational keynotes or empowering workshops that create new capabilities in the audience or bring teams together to co-innovate using design thinking and other tools, frameworks, and methods.

I would be more than happy to create and deliver a customized keynote or workshop to any audience anywhere in the world, on any of these broad topics:

  • Change
  • Innovation
  • Design Thinking
  • Digital Transformation

Or if want to do your own workshops inside your organization but need a little help transitioning these to the virtual world, I would be happy to assist you with this as well.

For more information, please see my speaker page or contact me.

Keep innovating!


Accelerate your change and transformation success

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Unlocking Creativity: Strategies and Techniques for Innovative Thinking

Unlocking Creativity: Strategies and Techniques for Innovative Thinking

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Creativity is a valuable asset in today’s fast-paced and competitive world. It is the key to finding new solutions, thinking outside the box, and pushing the boundaries of what is possible. Whether you are an entrepreneur, artist, or professional in any field, unlocking your creativity can lead to numerous benefits. In this article, we will explore strategies and techniques to enhance innovative thinking. We will also discuss two case study examples to demonstrate how these approaches can foster creativity.

1. Embracing Divergent Thinking:

Divergent thinking is a crucial aspect of creativity. It involves generating multiple ideas and exploring different possibilities. To unlock your creativity through divergent thinking, you can try the following strategies:

a. Mind mapping: Start by writing down your central idea or problem at the center of a blank page. Then, brainstorm related ideas and connect them with lines. This technique encourages free-flowing thinking and helps you see potential connections and patterns.

b. Random word association: Pick a word unrelated to your problem or idea and generate associations with it. This exercise prompts your brain to make unconventional connections, leading to novel ideas and possibilities.

Case study example 1: Pixar Animation Studios

Pixar is renowned for its creative storytelling and groundbreaking animations. In their pursuit of innovative ideas, they employ divergent thinking techniques. For instance, during brainstorming sessions for the movie “Finding Nemo,” the team used mind mapping to explore various themes, character traits, and underwater elements. This process helped them uncover unique storylines and create a captivating film.

2. Encouraging Constraints:

Contrary to popular belief, constraints can actually enhance creativity. When faced with limitations, our brains are forced to think more creatively and find innovative solutions. Here are two strategies to encourage creative thinking within constraints:

a. SCAMPER technique: SCAMPER is an acronym that stands for Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to another use, Eliminate, and Rearrange. This method prompts you to consider various modifications and possibilities with an existing idea or problem. By challenging yourself to think within these constraints, you can generate fresh and innovative concepts.

b. Forced connections: Take two seemingly unrelated ideas or concepts, and challenge yourself to find connections between them. This exercise forces your brain to think creatively within the given parameters, leading to unique and unexpected ideas.

Case study example 2: Google’s “20% Time”

Google famously implemented the “20% Time” policy, allowing employees to spend one-fifth of their work hours on personal projects unrelated to their assigned tasks. This constraint encouraged Google’s employees to explore their passions and come up with innovative ideas. This policy has led to groundbreaking initiatives such as Gmail and Google News, which originated from employees’ personal projects during their dedicated 20% time.

Conclusion

Unlocking creativity is essential for innovation and success in various domains. By embracing divergent thinking, encouraging constraints, and leveraging techniques like mind mapping and forced connections, individuals and organizations can unlock their creative potential. The case studies of Pixar Animation Studios and Google demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies in fostering innovation. By consistently implementing these strategies and techniques, you can enhance your creative thinking and achieve groundbreaking results in your endeavors.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of Open Innovation in Nurturing Creativity

The Role of Open Innovation in Nurturing Creativity

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s fast-paced and competitive world, fostering creativity and innovation has become a top priority for organizations seeking to stay ahead of the curve. Open innovation, a paradigm that emphasizes collaboration and knowledge sharing beyond the boundaries of a company, has emerged as a powerful tool in nurturing and fueling creativity. This article will explore the role of open innovation in fostering creativity and provide two case study examples highlighting its impact.

Open innovation breaks down the traditional barriers and silos that often hinder creativity within organizations. By opening up the innovation process to external partners, customers, and even the general public, companies are able to tap into a diverse range of perspectives and ideas that can spark creativity. This collaborative approach enables the pooling of resources, expertise, and insights, ultimately driving the development of novel and groundbreaking solutions.

Case Study 1 – Lego Ideas

One notable example of open innovation’s role in nurturing creativity is the LEGO Group. Facing tough market competition and declining sales during the early 2000s, LEGO embraced open innovation to revitalize its brand and reignite creativity. The LEGO Ideas platform was launched, allowing fans and enthusiasts to submit their own designs for potential LEGO sets. Users could vote for their favorite designs, and the ones receiving enough support would be considered for production. This open approach not only engaged customers more deeply but also provided a constant stream of new ideas for LEGO to leverage. The result was a resurgence in creativity, with sets like the LEGO Ideas Exo Suit and LEGO Ideas Saturn V becoming highly popular. This open innovation not only reinvigorated the brand but also significantly expanded the creative possibilities in the LEGO universe.

Case Study 2 – Microsoft Garage

Another compelling case study highlighting the impact of open innovation on creativity is the software giant Microsoft. In a bid to encourage innovation through open collaboration, Microsoft launched the Microsoft Garage initiative in 2009. The Garage encourages employees from different departments to collaborate on side projects and experiment with innovative ideas. Through this open innovation platform, employees are provided with time, resources, and a supportive environment to explore new concepts and technologies. One notable success story from Microsoft Garage is the development of the Microsoft HoloLens, a groundbreaking augmented reality device. Initially a side project of a few employees, the HoloLens gained significant traction within the company and ultimately became a flagship product, revolutionizing industries like healthcare, gaming, and architecture. The open innovation culture fostered by Microsoft Garage nurtures creativity within the company, leading to groundbreaking products that have a profound impact on the industry.

Conclusion

Open innovation’s role in nurturing creativity goes beyond specific case studies. By embracing collaboration, knowledge sharing, and external input, organizations can create an environment where new ideas thrive. Through platforms like crowdsourcing, innovation challenges, and co-creation initiatives, companies can tap into the collective wisdom and creativity of a diverse range of stakeholders. Such open approaches to innovation foster a culture of creativity and enable organizations to continuously adapt, evolve, and stay ahead of the competition in a rapidly changing world.

Open innovation plays a pivotal role in nurturing creativity within organizations. Through collaboration, knowledge sharing, and the inclusion of external stakeholders, companies can tap into a wealth of diverse perspectives and ideas. The case studies of LEGO and Microsoft demonstrate the transformative power of open innovation in driving creativity and innovation. By embracing an open approach, companies can unlock the full creative potential of their employees and stakeholders, leading to the development of innovative solutions that shape industries and define the future.

Image credit: Misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Co-Creation and Innovation

Co-Creation and Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Co-creation has become a major part of the innovation process, allowing companies to develop new products and services while engaging their customers in a meaningful way. By allowing customers to have a direct input in the product development process, companies can ensure that the end result meets their exact needs and preferences.

The concept of co-creation has been around for some time, but it has become increasingly important in recent years as companies recognize the need to stay ahead of the competition and provide customers with the best possible experience. By leveraging co-creation, companies can ensure that their products and services are tailored precisely to their customers’ needs, rather than guessing what those needs may be.

One of the most common forms of co-creation is crowdsourcing, which allows companies to solicit ideas from a large group of people. This can be done through online platforms that allow customers to submit their ideas, or by engaging customers directly in the design process. This process can take place in a variety of ways, such as online surveys or workshops, allowing customers to provide direct input into the product or service they’re looking for.

Using co-creation can also help companies to increase customer loyalty. By giving customers a direct say in the design process, companies can create a sense of ownership, and customers may feel more invested in the product or service they’ve helped create. This can lead to increased customer loyalty, as customers may be more likely to purchase the product or service and recommend it to others.

Finally, co-creation can help companies to gain valuable insights into customer preferences and trends. By engaging customers directly in the design process, companies can gain an intimate understanding of what customers want and need, which can be invaluable when it comes to developing new products and services.

In short, co-creation is a powerful tool in the innovation process that allows companies to stay ahead of the competition and ensure their products and services are tailored precisely to customer needs. By leveraging co-creation, companies can open up a dialogue with customers, increase customer loyalty, and gain valuable insights into customer trends. All of these benefits make co-creation an essential part of the innovation process.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Design Thinking for Innovation: Strategies to Generate New Ideas

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Innovation is the driving force behind the success of any organization. In a rapidly evolving world, businesses need to constantly generate new ideas and find creative solutions to stay ahead of the competition. Design thinking has emerged as a powerful approach to encourage innovation by putting the user at the center of the problem-solving process. By empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing, design thinking enables organizations to come up with innovative solutions that meet user needs and exceed expectations. In this article, we will explore two case study examples that showcase the effectiveness of design thinking in generating new ideas and fostering innovation.

Case Study 1: Airbnb

Airbnb, an online marketplace for vacation rentals, revolutionized the hospitality industry by utilizing design thinking principles. In the early stages, the founders faced the challenge of building trust between strangers to ensure the success of their platform. Understanding the user’s perspective, the founders discovered that potential guests were hesitant to stay at someone else’s home due to the lack of trust and a fear of the unknown.

To tackle this challenge, Airbnb employed design thinking methodologies to generate innovative ideas. They conducted extensive research, interviewing potential users to understand their concerns and needs. This empathetic approach allowed them to identify the key issues users faced and guided their problem-solving process.

One innovative idea that emerged from this process was the concept of a verified host and guest system. By implementing a robust identity verification process, Airbnb reassured users about the trustworthiness of hosts and guests. This solution helped build trust and elevated the user experience, resulting in increased adoption rates and rapid growth for the company.

Case Study 2: IDEO’s Shopping Cart Project

IDEO, a global design and innovation company, undertook a unique design thinking project aimed at reimagining the shopping cart experience for customers. The project began with deep empathy research, where IDEO’s designers immersed themselves in the customers’ environment, observing their shopping behaviors, and interviewing them to understand their pain points.

After identifying the key challenges, IDEO’s design team brainstormed numerous ideas to improve the shopping cart. They came up with concepts like “the cart as a companion” and “smart shopping carts” which featured innovative functionalities such as personalized shopping recommendations, quick check-out options, and even mobile charging stations.

Prototyping and testing played a vital role in refining the ideas. IDEO created physical prototypes and simulated shopping experiences, allowing real users to test and provide feedback. This iterative process helped IDEO narrow down the design options and eventually develop a more user-centric shopping cart that better aligned with customers’ needs and preferences.

Conclusion

Design thinking has proven to be an effective strategy for generating new ideas and fostering innovation. By prioritizing empathy, defining the problem, brainstorming concepts, prototyping, and testing, companies like Airbnb and IDEO have been able to create transformative solutions that push the boundaries of traditional thinking. By adopting design thinking methodologies, organizations can unlock their creative potential, adapt to changing market demands, and gain a competitive edge in today’s dynamic business landscape.

Bottom line: Futurists are not fortune tellers. They use a formal approach to achieve their outcomes, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to be their own futurist.

Image credit: Pexels

References:
– Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
– Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All. Crown Business.
– Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Toolkit for Managers. Columbia University Press.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Creative Leadership: Strategies for Inspiring and Motivating Teams

Creative Leadership: Strategies for Inspiring and Motivating Teams

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

As a leader, nothing is more rewarding than inspiring a team to success. Creative and effective leadership can be the difference between a team that works well and one that fails. Fortunately, there are specific strategies that leaders can deploy to ignite creativity and motivation in their teams.

Communication

Great communication is the foundation of creative leadership. Leaders should strive to be transparent, consistent, and encouraging with communications. This helps to ensure that teams have a well-defined purpose, are motivated to reach their goals, and understand exactly what is expected of them. Additionally, leaders should encourage team members to express their own ideas and challenges in order to foster collaboration and innovation.

Goal-Setting

One of the most important responsibilities of a leader is to help set and communicate achievable goals for the team. Goals should be time-sensitive, realistic, and measurable, so that team members have a clear target to strive for. Additionally, leaders should recognize and celebrate accomplishments, big and small, to boost morale and foster a sense of motivation within the team.

Incentives

Incentives are a powerful way to motivate the team. Monetary rewards or recognition for a job well done can be highly motivating. Leaders can also offer incentives such as extra vacation time, flex-time, employee-development programs, or other rewards that align with the team’s culture and values.

Case Study 1 – Ryan’s Auto Body

Ryan ran a successful auto body shop. To motivate his team, he provided incentives and rewards for a job well done. He offered bonus vacation time as well as employee-development programs. Ryan also set team goals and was sure to recognize and celebrate their successes. As a result, his team was motivated and creative, resulting in increased efficiency and productivity.

Case Study 2 – Cuisine of the Future

Patrick was the head chef of a high-end catering company. He communicated clearly with his team and encouraged them to express their own ideas and challenges. He also created a goal-setting system with time-sensitive criteria for success. As a result, Patrick’s team was inspired to come up with innovative dishes and techniques that elevated the company’s reputation even further.

Conclusion

Leadership is an important part of any team’s success. By utilizing effective strategies such as properly communicating expectations, setting achievable goals, and offering incentives, leaders can inspire and motivate their teams to greatness. With the right strategy, any leader can empower their teams to reach extraordinary heights.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Designing Work for Deep, Collaborative Focus

Flow State for Teams

Designing Work for Deep, Collaborative Focus

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
LAST UPDATED: January 7, 2026 at 12:26PM

In our current world, the noise of the digital world has reached a deafening crescendo. We have more tools than ever to “connect,” yet we find ourselves more fragmented than at any point in history. As an innovation speaker and practitioner of Human-Centered Innovation™, I consistently remind leaders that innovation is change with impact. However, impact is impossible if your team’s most valuable resource – their collective attention – is being harvested by the Corporate Antibody of constant interruption.

We have long understood individual “Flow” — that psychological state of optimal experience where time disappears and creativity peaks. But in 2026, the real competitive advantage lies in Team Flow. This is the ability of a group to synchronize their cognitive efforts, moving as a single, high-performance organism toward a shared outcome. To achieve this, we must stop leaving focus to chance and start designing for it as a core architectural requirement of the organization.

“Collective flow is the highest form of human-centered efficiency. When a team synchronizes their focus, they don’t just work faster; they inhabit the future together, turning the ‘useful seeds of invention’ into reality before the status quo even realizes the soil has been disturbed.” — Braden Kelley

The Architecture of Deep Collaboration

Many organizations fall into the Efficiency Trap, assuming that because information flows quickly through instant messaging and real-time dashboards, innovation must be happening. In reality, this “hyper-connectivity” often acts as a barrier to deep work. Team Flow requires a deliberate balancing act between high-bandwidth collaboration and uninterrupted cognitive solitude.

Now, the most successful firms are moving away from “Always-On” cultures toward “Rhythmic Focus” models. This involves aligning team schedules so that everyone enters deep work states at the same time, followed by structured, high-energy “bursts” of collaboration. By synchronizing the Cognitive (Thinking), Affective (Feeling), and Conative (Doing) domains like we do in Outcome-Driven Change, we reduce the friction of “context switching” that kills momentum.

Case Study 1: The “Silent Co-Creation” at Atlassian 2026

The Challenge: Despite being a leader in remote collaboration, Atlassian found that their cross-functional teams were suffering from “Meeting Fatigue,” where 70% of the day was spent discussing work rather than doing it.

The Human-Centered Shift: They implemented “Flow Blocks” — four-hour windows twice a week where all notifications are silenced, and teams engage in what they call “Silent Co-Creation.” During these blocks, team members work on a shared digital canvas without verbal interruption, using agentic AI to summarize changes in real-time for later review.

The Result: Project velocity increased by 45%. More importantly, employee engagement scores surged as engineers and designers felt they were finally being given the “permission to focus.” They successfully bypassed the Corporate Antibody of the “quick check-in” and fostered a culture of deep, impactful change.

Case Study 2: Designing Physical Focus at The LEGO Group

The Challenge: As LEGO expanded its digital services division, the physical open-office environment became a source of friction, preventing the deep concentration required for complex algorithmic and design work.

The Human-Centered Shift: Following the principles of Outcome-Driven Change, they redesigned their innovation hubs into “Library Zones” and “Marketplaces.” The Library Zones are zero-interruption areas designed for Group Flow, utilizing localized noise-canceling technology and visual signals to indicate when a sub-team is in a “Flow State.”

The Result: By physicalizing the boundaries of focus, LEGO reduced unintended interruptions by 60%. This environmental nudge helped teams move from transactional tasks to transformational innovation, ensuring that their useful seeds of invention had the quiet space necessary to take root.

Leading Companies and Startups to Watch in 2026

The infrastructure for Team Flow is being built by a new wave of visionary companies. Flow Club and Focusmate have evolved from individual tools into enterprise-grade “Deep Work Orchestrators,” using AI to match team members’ biological rhythms for peak focus. Humu, now more integrated than ever, uses behavioral science to “nudge” managers to protect their team’s flow windows. Keep a close eye on Reclaim.ai and Clockwise, which are shifting from simple calendar management to “Cognitive Load Balancing,” ensuring that no team is scheduled into a state of burnout. These organizations recognize that in the 2026 economy, attention is the ultimate currency.

Conclusion: Protecting the Human Heart of Focus

Ultimately, designing for Team Flow is an act of empathy. It is an acknowledgment that your people are not processors to be maximized, but creators to be protected. When we move beyond the Efficiency Trap and embrace Human-Centered Innovation™, we create environments where brilliance is not the exception, but the baseline.

We can and should be dedicated to helping our teams build a future where focus is the foundation of every breakthrough. We don’t just change for the sake of change; we change to create a world that works for humans.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How do you prevent Team Flow from becoming “groupthink”?

Team Flow is about the process of concentration, not the homogenization of ideas. By ensuring high levels of psychological safety and diverse perspectives before entering the flow state, the period of deep focus actually amplifies the unique contributions of each member rather than suppressing them.

2. Can Team Flow work in a fully remote or hybrid environment?

Yes, but it requires digital discipline. Remote teams must use “digital boundaries” — dedicated focus channels, synchronized Do Not Disturb modes, and “Office Hours” for interruptions. The technology must serve the focus, not the other way around.

3. What is the biggest barrier to achieving Group Flow?

The Corporate Antibody. This is the organizational reflex to prioritize immediate visibility and “busy-ness” over long-term impact. Leaders must be willing to sacrifice the illusion of constant accessibility to gain the reality of profound innovation.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credits: Google Gemini

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Neuroscience of Unlearning

Making Room for New Operating Systems

Why unlearning is the hidden challenge of transformation and how leaders can design environments that enable cognitive renewal.

The Neuroscience of Unlearning

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
LAST UPDATED: January 1, 2026 at 12:54PM

In our current world, we are witnessing a phenomenon that most traditional business models were never designed to handle: the absolute necessity of erasure. For decades, the mantra of the corporate world was “continuous learning.” We built massive infrastructures dedicated to upskilling, reskilling, and the acquisition of new knowledge. But in 2026, as agentic AI and autonomous systems begin to handle the transactional “grunt work” of innovation, we are discovering that the true bottleneck to progress isn’t a lack of new information. It is the overwhelming presence of old information.

To move forward, we must understand the Neuroscience of Unlearning. We aren’t just updating software; we are attempting to overwrite deeply encoded biological “operating systems” that have been reinforced by years of success, survival, and habit. As a globally recognized innovation speaker, I frequently remind my audiences that innovation is change with impact, and you cannot have impact if your mental real estate is fully occupied by the ghosts of yesterday’s best practices.

“The hardest part of innovation is not the learning of new things, but the unlearning of old ones. We are trying to run a 2026 AI-driven OS on a 1995 hierarchical mindset, and the biological friction is what we misinterpret as resistance to change.” — Braden Kelley

The Biology of Cognitive Inertia

Our brains are masterpieces of efficiency. Through a process called Long-Term Potentiation (LTP), the neural pathways we use most frequently become “paved” with myelin, a fatty substance that speeds up electrical signals. This is why a seasoned executive can make a complex decision in seconds—their brain has built a high-speed expressway for that specific pattern of thought. However, this efficiency is also a cage. When the environment changes—as it has so drastically with the rise of decentralized work and generative collaboration—those expressways lead to the wrong destination.

Unlearning requires Long-Term Depression (LTD), the biological process of weakening synaptic connections. Unlike learning, which feels additive and exciting, unlearning feels like a loss. It is metabolically expensive and emotionally taxing. It requires us to activate our metacognition—our ability to think about our thinking—and consciously inhibit the dominant neural networks that tell us, “this is how we’ve always done it.” This is where the Corporate Antibody lives; it isn’t just a cultural problem, it is a neurological one.

Case Study 1: The Kodak “Comfort Trap”

The Challenge: Despite inventing the first digital camera in 1975, Kodak famously failed to capitalize on the technology, eventually filing for bankruptcy in 2012. Many attribute this to a lack of technical foresight, but the root cause was a failure of unlearning.

The Cognitive Friction: Kodak’s “Operating System” was built on the chemical process of film and the high-margin razor-and-blade model of silver-halide paper. Their leaders were neurologically “wired” to see the world through the lens of physical consumables. Digital photography wasn’t just a new tool; it required unlearning the very definition of their business. They couldn’t “depress” the neural pathways associated with film fast enough to make room for the digital ecosystem.

The Lesson: Knowledge is a power, but it can also create blind spots. Kodak’s experts were so good at the old game that they were biologically incapable of playing a new one.

Upgrading the Human OS

In 2026, the shift is even more profound. We are unlearning the concept of “work as a location” and “management as oversight.” Leading organizations are now focusing on Human-AI Teaming, where the human role shifts from originator to curator. This requires a radical unlearning of individual ego. To succeed today, a leader must unlearn the need to be the “smartest person in the room” and instead become the most “connective person in the network.”

Case Study 2: Microsoft’s Growth Mindset Transformation

The Challenge: Prior to Satya Nadella’s tenure, Microsoft was defined by a “know-it-all” culture. Internal competition was fierce, and silos were reinforced by a psychological contract that rewarded individual brilliance over collective innovation.

The Unlearning Strategy: Nadella didn’t just introduce new products; he mandated a shift to a “learn-it-all” (and “unlearn-it-all”) philosophy. This was a Human-Centered Change masterclass. By prioritizing psychological safety, he allowed employees to admit what they didn’t know. This lowered the “threat response” in the brain, making it neurologically possible for employees to dismantle old competitive habits and embrace a cloud-first, collaborative mindset.

The Result: By unlearning the “Windows-only” worldview, Microsoft reclaimed its position as a market leader, proving that cultural transformation is, at its heart, a massive exercise in neural rewiring.

Leading Companies and Startups to Watch

As we navigate 2026, watch companies like Anthropic, whose “Constitutional AI” approach is forcing us to unlearn traditional prompt engineering in favor of ethical alignment. BetterUp is another key player, using behavioral science and coaching to help employees “unlearn” burnout-inducing habits. In the productivity space, Atlassian is leading the way by unlearning the traditional office-centric model and replacing it with “Intentional Togetherness,” a framework that uses data to determine when physical presence actually drives value. Also, keep an eye on startups like Tessl and Vapi, which are redefining the “OS of work” by automating the transactional, forcing us to unlearn our reliance on manual task management and focus instead on high-value human creativity.

“Unlearning feels like failure to the brain, even when it is the smartest move available.” — Braden Kelley

Conclusion: Making Room for the Future

To get to the future first, you must be willing to travel light. The “useful seeds of invention” are often buried under the weeds of outdated assumptions. As you look at your own organization or career, ask yourself: What am I holding onto because it made me successful in 2020? What “best practices” have become “worst habits” in a 2026 economy? The Neuroscience of Unlearning tells us that while it is difficult to change, it is biologically possible. We simply need to provide our brains—and our teams—with the safety, time, and intentionality required to clear the path for a new operating system.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is unlearning harder than learning?

Learning is additive and often triggers the reward centers of the brain. Unlearning requires weakening existing, myelinated neural pathways (Long-Term Depression), which the brain perceives as a loss or a threat. It is more metabolically expensive and emotionally difficult to “delete” than to “save.”

What is a “Corporate Antibody”?

It is the natural organizational resistance to change. Just as a biological antibody attacks a foreign virus, an organization’s existing culture, processes, and “successful” mental models will attack new ideas that threaten the status quo. Successful unlearning requires “disarming” these antibodies through psychological safety.

How can a leader encourage unlearning in their team?

Leaders must model vulnerability. By moving from a “know-it-all” to a “learn-it-all” mindset, they create a safe space for others to question outdated habits. Using frameworks like the Change Planning Toolkit™ helps make this transition structured rather than chaotic.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credits: Google Gemini

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Future-Proofing Human Creativity in the Age of Algorithmic Output

LAST UPDATED: December 30, 2025 at 2:51PM

Future-Proofing Human Creativity in the Age of Algorithmic Output

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Innovation has always been about change with impact. But as we navigate the late 2025 landscape, a new threat has emerged: the AI Creativity Trap. Organizations are rushing to replace human ideation with algorithmic output, lured by the siren song of “infinite content” and “zero-cost drafts.” However, we must be vigilant. If we are not intentional, a myopic focus on this technology will take us down the path of least resistance — the path where our creative energy moves to where it is easiest to go, rather than where it is most meaningful.

The truth is that Artificial Intelligence is superhuman at pattern recognition but fundamentally “backward-looking.” It is trained on yesterday’s data. To get to the future first, we need analogical thinking — the ability to connect unrelated domains and find the “Aha!” moments that a database of the past simply cannot predict. We are not just building tools; we are managing a transition of the human spirit.

“The algorithm can find the pattern, but only the human can find the purpose. Innovation isn’t just about what is possible; it is about what is purposeful and how it transforms the quality of people’s lives in ways they cherish.”

Braden Kelley

The Corporate Antibody vs. The Generative Ally

When we introduce AI into the creative workflow, the corporate antibody — the natural organizational resistance to disruption — often manifests in two ways: total rejection or total abdication. Both are fatal. Future-proofing your organization requires Human-AI Teaming, where the machine handles the computational complexity and the human provides the emotional resonance and cultural nuance.

Case Study 1: The Empathy Engine in Global Contact Centers

The Challenge: A major global utility provider was seeing a “Trust Deficit” as their automated IVR systems frustrated customers, leading to high churn. Their initial instinct was to use Generative AI to replace agents entirely to save costs.

The Human-Centered Solution: Following the Cautious Adoption Framework, they shifted strategy. Instead of replacing agents, they deployed AI as a “Co-Pilot” that synthesized customer history and emotional sentiment in real-time. When a customer called in frustrated, the AI didn’t speak for the agent; it provided the agent with a three-bullet emotional dossier and suggested empathetic pathways. The Result: Resolution speed increased by 30%, but more importantly, agent job satisfaction rose because they were empowered to solve complex human problems rather than digging through data. They moved from being transactional clerks to high-value relationship managers.

Case Study 2: Breaking the ‘Average’ in Architectural Design

The Challenge: An urban planning firm found that using standard AI design tools led to “Architectural Homogenization” — every building proposal started to look like a blend of the most popular designs from the last five years. Their creative edge was evaporating into the “commodity of the average.”

The FutureHacking™ Approach: The firm implemented a rule: AI could only be used for stress-testing and rapid iteration, never for the initial “seed” of the idea. Architects were tasked with finding analogies from biology and music to create the initial concept. Only after the human “soul” of the building was defined did the AI step in to optimize for structural integrity and light efficiency. The Result: They won three consecutive international competitions because their designs possessed a distinctive cultural thumbprint that purely algorithmic competitors lacked. They proved that AI “collapses” when context changes, but human intuition thrives in the cracks of the unknown.

Leading Companies and Startups to Watch

In the current 2025 landscape, we must look beyond the “Big Tech” giants to find the true architects of human-AI collaboration. Anthropic continues to lead with their “Constitutional AI” approach, ensuring Claude remains aligned with human ethical frameworks. Adobe has set the gold standard for IP-friendly creativity with the Firefly Video Model, which empowers creators rather than scraping them. Startups like Anysphere (the team behind Cursor) are redefining “vibe coding,” allowing developers to stay in a flow state while the AI handles the boilerplate. Meanwhile, Cerebras Systems is building the “wafer-scale” hardware that will allow us to move beyond the limitations of current GPUs, potentially opening the door for AI that understands physics and three-dimensional context more deeply than ever before.

Architecting the Future Present

Success in this age will not be defined by who has the most powerful LLM, but by who has the most resilient creative culture. We must tell our employees the truth: technology will change your job, but it doesn’t have to eliminate your value. By focusing on experience design and empathy-driven innovation, we can ensure that we aren’t just optimizing for obsolescence, but building a world where technology serves the human spark, not the other way around.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do we prevent AI from making all creative work look the same?

The key is to use AI as an iterative partner rather than an originative source. By forcing the “initial seed” of a project to come from human analogical thinking — finding connections across unrelated domains — you ensure the output has a unique “soul” that a pattern-matching algorithm cannot replicate.

What is the biggest risk of over-automating creativity?

I call this the AI Creativity Trap. When teams rely too heavily on AI for ideation, their “creative muscles” atrophy. Research shows that when context or constraints change unexpectedly, purely AI-driven solutions often “collapse,” whereas human-led teams can flex and adapt using their unique emotional intelligence.

How can leaders build trust during AI transitions?

Trust is built through behavior, not just words. Leaders must be transparent about why the change is happening and involve employees early in defining how the tools will be used. Following a Cautious Adoption Framework — starting with low-risk, high-utility tasks — helps people see the AI as an ally that removes “grunt work” to free them up for “soul work.”

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credits: Google Gemini

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Anchors & Biases – How Cognitive Shortcuts Kill New Ideas

LAST UPDATED: December 10, 2025 at 12:12PM

Anchors & Biases - How Cognitive Shortcuts Kill New Ideas

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Innovation is inherently messy, uncertain, and challenging. To navigate this complexity, our brains rely on cognitive shortcuts – heuristics — to save time and energy. While these shortcuts are useful for avoiding immediate danger or making routine decisions, they become the primary internal roadblocks when attempting to generate or evaluate truly novel ideas. These shortcuts are our anchors and biases, and they consistently pull us back to the familiar, the safe, and the incremental.

In the context of Human-Centered Innovation, we must shift our focus from just generating innovation to protecting it from these internal threats. The key is to recognize the most common biases that derail novel concepts and build specific, deliberate processes to counteract them. We must unlearn the assumption of pure rationality and embrace the fact that all decision-making, especially concerning risk and novelty, is tainted by predictable cognitive errors. This recognition is the first step toward building a truly bias-aware innovation ecosystem.

Anchors & Biases - How Cognitive Shortcuts Kill New Ideas

Visual representation: A diagram illustrating the innovation funnel being constricted at different stages (Ideation, Evaluation, Funding) by three key cognitive biases: Anchoring, Confirmation Bias, and Status Quo Bias.

Three Innovation Killers and How to Disarm Them

While hundreds of biases exist, three are particularly lethal to the innovation process:

1. Anchoring Bias: The Tyranny of the First Number

The Anchoring Bias occurs when people rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the “anchor”) when making decisions. In innovation, the anchor is often the budget of the last project, the timeline of the most recent success, or the projected ROI of the initial idea submission. This anchor skews all subsequent analysis, making it nearly impossible to objectively evaluate ideas that fall far outside that initial range.

  • The Killer: A disruptive idea requiring a tenfold increase in budget compared to the anchor will be instantly dismissed as “too expensive,” even if the potential ROI is twentyfold.
  • The Disarmer: Use Premortem Analysis (imagining the project failed and listing the causes) before assigning any financial figures. Also, use Three-Point Estimates (optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely) to establish a range, preventing a single number from becoming the dominant anchor.

2. Confirmation Bias: Seeking Proof, Not Truth

The Confirmation Bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms or supports one’s prior beliefs or values. In innovation, this leads teams to design market research that validates their pet idea and ignore data that challenges it. This results in the pursuit of solutions nobody wants, but which the team believes they want.

  • The Killer: A team falls in love with a solution and only interviews customers who fit their narrow ideal profile, ignoring a critical segment whose objections would save the project from failure.
  • The Disarmer: Institute a Red Team/Blue Team structure. Assign a dedicated “Red Team” whose only job is to rigorously critique the idea and actively seek disconfirming evidence and data. Leadership must reward the Red Team for finding flaws, not just for confirming the status quo.

3. Status Quo Bias: The Comfort of the Familiar

The Status Quo Bias is the preference for the current state of affairs. Any change from the baseline is perceived as a loss, and the pain of potential loss outweighs the potential gain of the new idea. This is the organizational immune system fighting off innovation. It’s why companies often choose to incrementally improve a dying product rather than commit to a disruptive new platform.

  • The Killer: A new business model that could unlock 5x revenue is rejected because it requires decommissioning a legacy product that currently contributes 10% of profit, even though that product is in terminal decline. The perceived certainty of the 10% trumps the uncertainty of the 5x.
  • The Disarmer: Employ Zero-Based Budgeting for Ideas. Force teams to justify the existence of current processes or products as if they were a new idea competing for resources. Ask: “If we didn’t offer this product today, would we launch it now?” If the answer is no, the status quo must be challenged.

Case Study 1: The Anchor That Sank the Startup

Challenge: Undervaluing Disruptive Potential Due to Legacy Pricing

A B2B SaaS startup (“DataFlow”) developed an AI tool that automated a complex, manual compliance reporting process, reducing the time required from 40 hours per month to 2 hours. The initial team, anchored to the price of the legacy human labor (which cost clients approximately $4,000/month), decided to price their software at a conservative $300/month.

Bias in Action: Anchoring Bias

The team failed to anchor their pricing to the value delivered (time savings, error reduction, regulatory certainty) and instead anchored it to the legacy cost structure. Their $300 price point led potential high-value clients to view the product as a minor utility, not a mission-critical tool, because the price was too low relative to the problem solved. They were competing on cost, not value.

  • The Correction: External consultants forced the team to re-anchor based on the avoided regulatory fine risk (a $100k-$500k loss). They repositioned the product as an insurance policy rather than a software license and successfully raised the price to $2,500/month, radically improving their perceived value, sales pipeline, and runway.

The Innovation Impact:

By identifying and aggressively correcting the anchoring bias, DataFlow unlocked its true market value. The innovation was technical, but the success was achieved through cognitive clarity in pricing strategy.

Case Study 2: The Confirmation Loop That Killed the Feature

Challenge: Launching a Feature Based on Internal Enthusiasm, Not Customer Need

A social media platform (“ConnectAll”) decided to integrate a complex 3D-modeling feature based on the CEO’s enthusiasm and anecdotal data from a few early-adopter focus groups. The development team, driven by Confirmation Bias, only sought feedback that praised the technical complexity and novelty of the feature.

Bias in Action: Confirmation Bias & Sunk Cost

The internal team, having invested six months of work (Sunk Cost Fallacy), refused to pivot when the initial Beta tests showed confusion and low usage. They argued that users simply needed more training. When the feature launched, user adoption was near zero, and the feature became a maintenance drain, detracting resources from core product improvements.

  • The Correction: Post-mortem analysis showed the team needed Formal Disconfirmation. The new innovation process mandates that market testing must include a structured interview block where testers are paid to actively try and break the new feature, list its flaws, and articulate why they wouldn’t use it.

The Innovation Impact:

ConnectAll learned that the purpose of testing is not to confirm success, but to disconfirm failure. By forcing teams to seek and respect evidence that contradicts their initial beliefs, they now kill flawed ideas faster and redirect resources to validated, human-centered needs.

Conclusion: Bias-Awareness is the New Innovation Metric

The greatest barrier to radical innovation isn’t a lack of ideas or funding; it’s the predictability of human psychology. Cognitive biases like Anchoring, Confirmation Bias, and Status Quo Bias act as unconscious filters, ensuring that only the incremental and familiar survive the evaluation process. Organizations committed to Human-Centered Innovation must make bias-awareness a core competency. By building systematic checks (Premortems, Red Teams, Zero-Based Thinking) into every stage of the innovation pipeline, leaders transform cognitive shortcuts from fatal flaws into predictable inputs that can be managed. To innovate boldly, you must first think clearly.

“The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled — and often, that fire is choked by the ashes of old assumptions.” — Braden Kelley

Build a Common Language of Innovation on your team

Frequently Asked Questions About Cognitive Biases in Innovation

1. What is the difference between a heuristic and a cognitive bias?

A heuristic is a mental shortcut used to solve problems quickly and efficiently — it is the process. A cognitive bias is a systematic pattern of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment — it is the predictable error resulting from the heuristic. Biases are the consequences of using mental shortcuts (heuristics) in inappropriate contexts, such as innovation evaluation.

2. How does the Status Quo Bias relate to the Sunk Cost Fallacy?

The Status Quo Bias is a preference for the current state (a passive resistance to change). The Sunk Cost Fallacy is the resistance to changing a current course of action because of resources already invested (an active commitment to past expenditure). Both work together to kill new ideas: the Status Quo protects the legacy product, and Sunk Cost Fallacy protects the legacy project that failed to deliver.

3. Can AI help eliminate human cognitive biases in decision-making?

Yes. AI can be a powerful tool to mitigate human bias by acting as an objective “Red Team.” AI can be prompted to ignore anchors (e.g., “Analyze this idea assuming zero prior investment”), actively seek disconfirming data, and simulate scenarios free of human emotional attachment, providing a rational baseline for decision-making and challenging the human team’s assumptions.

Your first step toward mitigating bias: Before your next innovation meeting, ask everyone to write down the largest successful project budget from the last year. Collect these, then start the discussion on the new idea’s budget by referencing the highest and lowest numbers submitted. This simple act of introducing multiple anchors diffuses the power of any single number and forces a broader discussion.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.