Tag Archives: metrics

You Just Got Starbucked

Layoffs, Store Closures & What It Means for Customer Service

Exclusive Interview with Mario Matulich

In a world where corporate decisions often prioritize efficiency, the human element can be the first to suffer. The recent layoffs and restructuring at Starbucks, a brand synonymous with a unique, human-centered “third place” experience, have sent a tremor through the industry. In a wide-ranging interview, we will unpack the strategic and operational implications of these changes. Together, we will explore the difficult balance between trimming corporate fat and maintaining a brand built on emotional connection, diving into how these decisions could affect everything from in-store morale to the long-term loyalty of its customers. Central to the conversation is the following strategic question:

How can a company that has undergone significant corporate restructuring and layoffs maintain and restore a premium, human-centered customer experience?

Today we will explore this question, along with its various aspects with our special guest Mario Matulich, a practice lead at the Customer Management Practice with a diverse commercial understanding in a variety of industry verticals across the customer management sector. He is well versed in market research, product development, sales, marketing, and operations in addition to cross functional management and leadership development.

Without further ado, here is the Q&A I had with Mario on a range of topics regarding the recent Starbucks’ store closures and layoffs and their implications:

The Strategic Context of the Layoffs

Q: Starbucks’ leadership framed the recent restructuring as a necessary step for efficiency and a return to their core mission. From your perspective in customer management, how do these internal changes directly affect the external customer experience in the short and long term?
A: In the short term, layoffs, especially in corporate roles, can create gaps in innovation, brand narrative, and strategic support for store-level teams. Employees on the front lines may feel increased pressure, which can impact morale and the human connection customers expect. In the long term, if these gaps aren’t addressed, the result can be a more transactional experience that erodes both loyalty and trust.

Q: In many companies, layoffs are a last resort. Do you believe this restructuring reflects a failure of previous strategies, or is it a forward-thinking move to adapt to a changing market? What specific market trends do you think are driving these decisions?
A: I don’t view this restructuring as purely a failure of previous strategies, but rather as an attempt to adapt to a changing market. That said, Starbucks’ bigger challenge is restoring its customer experience. Trends such as rising demand for personalized, convenient, and high-value experiences, along with increased competition in the premium coffee market, make it clear that customers are evaluating Starbucks not just on price, but on the overall experience delivered.

Q: The layoffs primarily targeted corporate roles in marketing, technology, and creative. How does the loss of talent in these specific areas impact the company’s ability to innovate and maintain its brand narrative?
A: These areas are critical for innovation, storytelling, and digital experiences that connect customers to the brand. Losing talent here makes it more challenging to maintain a consistent, differentiated experience and risks further disengagement from customers.

Impact on the Human-Centered Experience

Q: Starbucks has long prided itself on the “third place” concept. How does restructuring and potential employee demoralization affect the in-store experience and the emotional connection customers have with the brand?
A: The “third place” experience relies on motivated and supported employees. Restructuring can disrupt this, as uncertainty and low morale may trickle down to in-store interactions. Customers may perceive a decline in warmth, attentiveness, and consistency, which can undermine the emotional connection.

Q: With fewer people in corporate roles, who now owns the responsibility for a seamless customer journey? Does this push more responsibility onto store-level partners, and if so, are they equipped to handle it?
A: While partners remain at the front line, the burden shouldn’t fall solely on them. Leadership must provide tools, guidance, and support to ensure a seamless experience, even as corporate teams shrink.

Q: Customer management is about building long-term loyalty. Do you believe this restructuring risks eroding the trust and loyalty of both employees and customers, and what would your practice recommend to mitigate that risk?
A: Yes, there’s definitely a risk. The key is to go back to the basics and make the experience personal, easy, and fast. Nail those, and customers’ trust and loyalty will .,¬./come back, and the layoffs won’t linger in their minds.

Measuring and Recovering from the Impact

Q: How would you advise Starbucks to measure the real-time impact of these changes on customer satisfaction? Beyond traditional metrics like NPS, what holistic experience measures should they be tracking?
A: Starbucks should look beyond NPS to measure speed of service, personalization, emotional connection, and overall experience consistency. These metrics provide a more comprehensive view of the customer journey and help identify gaps that layoffs may create.

Q: Layoffs can create a perception of instability. What is the most effective way for a company to communicate its recovery plan and rebuild confidence with its customer base after such a significant change?
A: Clear communication focused on restoring the core pillars of customer experience, personalization, ease, and speed, is key. Customers respond when they see tangible improvements in the experience they receive every day.

Q: In your experience, what is the typical timeline for a company to recover from the brand and cultural damage that can follow widespread layoffs? What are the critical milestones they should be focused on achieving?
A: Recovery timelines vary, but visible improvements in customer experience can begin within months if executed strategically. Critical milestones include reestablishing operational consistency, restoring employee morale, and relaunching key brand initiatives that reinforce the premium experience promise.

Future-Proofing for Long-Term Growth

Q: Looking ahead, how can Starbucks utilize this moment of disruption to adopt a more resilient and human-centered organizational model? What key lesson should other companies learn from their experience to avoid similar pitfalls?
A: Starbucks has a chance here to get back to what really made it successful: combining innovative, tech-forward solutions with a human touch, every time. The bigger lesson for any company is clear. Growth and cost-cutting shouldn’t come at the expense of the customer experience. People are willing to pay a premium, but only if the experience feels worth it.

Q: What message does it send that the popular Starbucks Roastery location in Capitol Hill in Seattle is being closed as part of this layoff and restructuring initiative? Why do you think they chose to do it?
A: Closing the Roastery signals a prioritization of efficiency over experiential destinations. While it may make financial sense in the short term, it also serves as a cautionary reminder that iconic, high-touch experiences are critical to maintaining brand differentiation and customer loyalty.

Conclusion

Thank you for the great conversation Mario!

Ultimately, the Starbucks case study is a powerful lesson for every organization. As Matulich’s insights make clear, the pursuit of efficiency and growth cannot come at the expense of the human experience that defines your brand. The true measure of a company’s resilience is not in its stock price, but in the trust it has built with its employees and customers. A single-minded focus on traditional metrics is insufficient; a holistic approach that values emotional connection and employee morale is the only path to sustainable growth. The greatest challenge for Starbucks now is to move beyond reacting to a difficult market and begin proactively shaping its future—not just through cost-cutting, but by recommitting to the core narrative that made it a cultural institution in the first place. The future of any business is not found in a spreadsheet; it’s built on a foundation of human connection, one interaction at a time.

Image credits: Pexels, Mario Matulich

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Is Your Innovation Strategy on Track?

Leave a reply

Is Your Innovation Strategy on Track?

GUEST POST from Stefan Lindegaard

A solid innovation strategy is key to setting your organization up for long-term success. But how do you know if you’re on the right path? Here are a few signs that your innovation strategy is sound – and some KPI/metrics tips to guide you along the way.

1. Alignment with Corporate Strategy

A strong innovation strategy doesn’t stand alone—it’s integrated with the overall corporate strategy. While innovation teams often lean more visionary, the core business balances daily execution with future growth. Finding the “sweet spot” between these perspectives helps shape an innovation strategy that is bold yet achievable.

KPI/metrics: Strategic alignment score. Are innovation initiatives aligned with overall business goals and timelines? Does the strategy push far enough to create the future, but close enough to today’s realities?

2. Clarity on Innovation Type

It’s critical to know what type of innovation your organization is pursuing. Incremental innovation? Breakthrough or radical? Or perhaps you’re aiming for “in-between” innovation – meaningful advancement without the high stakes of disruptive change.

KPI/metrics: Track innovation project distribution across types (incremental, in-between, breakthrough). Are you focusing on the sweet spot for your capabilities?

3. Understanding of Ecosystem Dynamics

In-between innovation, where companies push beyond small improvements but not into complete market disruption, often benefits from ecosystem collaboration. This means tapping into external assets and building alliances that complement internal capabilities.

KPI/metrics: Number and quality of ecosystem partnerships. How many productive partnerships are helping you access needed assets or knowledge?

Six Innovation Models by BCG

4. Balance Between Vision and Reality

The innovation team may lean toward bold, future-shaping ideas, while the core business focuses on today’s realities. A sound strategy balances both perspectives – pushing boundaries while staying feasible within current business structures.

KPI/metrics: Time-to-market for innovation projects. Are projects moving efficiently from concept to market, indicating a practical balance between vision and execution?

5. Talent and Skills Alignment

A clear innovation strategy should inform talent requirements. Are the right skills and roles in place to support the type of innovation you’re aiming for?

KPI/metrics: Skills gap analysis for innovation-related roles. Does your team have the capabilities needed to bring your strategy to life?

6. Adaptability and Resilience

Innovation doesn’t follow a straight line. A sound strategy allows for flexibility and quick pivots based on market feedback, technology shifts, and emerging opportunities.

KPI/metrics: Percentage of innovation projects adapted or redirected based on feedback. How adaptable is your team in responding to change?

Your innovation strategy should guide you in defining what’s possible, aligning with your corporate strategy, and fostering a collaborative yet grounded approach. The right KPIs help you measure progress and ensure alignment with your strategic vision.

I hope this shorter post can help spur some reflection and raise some guiding questions for your efforts and initiatives.

Image Credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Unblocking Change

Leave a reply

Unblocking Change

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

If you want things to change, you have two options. You can incentivize change or you can move things out of the way that block change. The first way doesn’t work and the second one does. For more details, click this link at it will take you to a post that describes the late Danny Kahneman’s thoughts on the subject.

And, also from Kahneman, to move things out of the way and unblock change, change the environment.

Change Blocker 1 – Metrics

When you measure someone on efficiency, you get efficiency. And if people think a potential change could reduce efficiency, that change is blocked. And the same goes for all metrics associated with cost, quality and speed. When a change threatens the metric, the change will be blocked. To change the environment to eliminate the blocking, help people understand who the change will actually IMPROVE the metric. Do the analysis and educate those who would be negatively impacted if the change reduced the metric. Change their environment to one that believes the change will improve the metric.

Change Blocker 2 – Incentives

When someone’s bonus could be negatively impacted by a potential change, that change will be blocked. Figure out whose incentive compensation are jeopardized by the potential change and help them understand how the potential change will actually increase their incentives. You may have to explain that their incentives will increase in the long term, but that’s an argument that holds water. Until they believe their incentives will not suffer, they’ll block the change.

Change Blocker 3 – Fear

This is the big one – fear of negative consequences. Here’s a short list: fear of being judged, fear of being blamed, fear of losing status, fear of losing control, fear of losing a job, fear of losing a promotion, fear of looking stupid and fear of failing. One of the best ways to help people get over their fear is to run a small experiment that demonstrates that they have nothing to fear. Show them that the change will actually work. Show them how they’ll benefit.

Eliminating the things that block change is fundamentally different than pushing people in the direction of change. It’s different in effectiveness and approach. Start with the questions: “What’s in the way of change?” or “Who is in the way of change?” and then “Why are they in the way of change?” From there, you’ll have an idea what must be moved out of the way. And then ask: “How can their environment be changed so the change-blocker can be moved out of the way?”

What’s in the way of giving it a try?

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Transforming Metrics into Action

Leave a reply

Customer Experience (CX) Leaders At Verizon, Autodesk And Prudential Are Going Beyond NPS

Transforming Metrics Into Action

GUEST POST from Shep Hyken

Is Net Promoter Score (NPS) still relevant? How can you transfer insights and data into meaningful actions? And how do you hire the right people to meet your Keep Performance Indicators (KPIs) and success metrics? Those were the questions I asked a panel of esteemed executives at a LinkedIn Live interview.

The guests were Brian Higgins, chief customer experience officer at Verizon Consumer, Elisabeth Zornes, chief customer officer at Autodesk, and Abhii Parakh, head of customer experience at Prudential. Their answers are important to any leader making decisions that impact the customer experience.

NPS Is A Foundational Metric, But Its Role Is Evolving

NPS is a powerful metric when used properly. It’s a simple question that determines whether a customer likes you enough to recommend you. From that single question, a follow-up question could seek further insight or action can be taken to improve what’s not working and elevate what is working. So, the first question I asked was about using NPS as a primary metric.

Parakh led off by saying, “No metric is perfect. Whether it’s NPS or something else, it’s always about a combination of tactics and measurements to get the insights on what our customers and advisors want. … We run the numbers on how much more value is being driven by our promoters or passives versus detractors, and we see a very meaningful connection between the two.” He cited three key benefits: effectively tracking long-term relationships, correlation with growth metrics and providing actionable insights.
Higgins said that Verizon uses NPS to benchmark in two important places. He said, “I want to look at how we are benchmarking against the competition and then against ourselves.” He looks at three areas: one, is Verizon growing or churning? The second is measuring interaction, both digital and with their reps. The third is taking a look at the overall health of the business. And in addition to measuring customer satisfaction, Verizon also uses NPS for employee satisfaction. If employees aren’t happy, the customer is going to feel it.
Zornes uses the measurement to strike a balance between Autodesk’s long-term relationships and direct engagement. She explained, “NPS is a great, long-lasting customer impression measurement for services, solutions and products, but we are in the age of digital first engagements, so we, of course, also measure specific moments in the digital journey along with customer effort scores.” While NPS is a foundational metric at Autodesk, they also use the Deloitte Trust ID to assess transparency, capability, reliability and care.

Bring Numbers To Life Through Employees

Competition turns companies and their products into commodities. All three companies represented on the panel have competition. Assuming the products and services do what they are supposed to do and meet their customers’ needs, what differentiates them from competitors is experience. Often, that experience is driven by employees. The next question focused on the hiring criteria that align with CX KPIs.

Zornes said, “The internal team and culture are really what determines the customer experience for our customers. So it’s absolutely critical we bring the right talent on board and foster it accordingly.”
Higgins focuses on three big areas for hiring. First, Verizon wants a wide range of experience and knowledge. Second, they want employees to act as “CX detectives,” meaning they never let small details get by. Listen and pay attention to the customer feedback and recognize the power of the details. Third, and what Higgins says is most important, is empathy. “A little voice in the back of your head says, ‘I don’t know if the customer is right, but that doesn’t matter. You’ve got to believe in them and make it right for them.’”
Parakh says, “It’s super important for any customer-facing role. But I would also say that in addition to customer experience roles, I think that a customer-obsessed mindset is important for any business role. It’s not just the CX team. I think customer experience is everybody’s job. So, across the company, we need to be looking for folks who have empathy for the customer, a growth mindset and familiarity with CX, as well as business knowledge.”

Rethinking How Technology And People Support CX

As the CX landscape evolves with new technology, so do the roles of employees. How do these three iconic brands rethink talent development to support the team’s ability to deliver an exceptional experience?

Higgins kicked off with a call back to Parakh’s comment about CX being everyone’s job. “If everyone owns CX across the company, it also means they have to get comfortable with the new sets of tools we’re putting in place. I think about AI, gen AI and agentic AI. You have to make sure employees are comfortable with these new tools that are engaging directly with customers.”
Parakh emphasized the importance of keeping up and changing with the times. “You can’t survive for 150 years by doing what you’ve always done. We’ve been through multiple stock market crashes and multiple pandemics, and we’ve done that by constantly reinventing, so when it comes to talent, we have to have the same mindset. Everybody in the company, starting from the top leadership, has to understand where things are going because everything is changing so fast.”
Zornes believes that the future is now. “AI is not coming. AI is here. And with that, there is a huge opportunity to really convert those transactions that we might have done in the past to a more smooth and self-service experience. … Some of the profiles of what jobs looked like in the past, what they look like now and what they will look like in the future continue to evolve.”

The future of customer experience lies at the intersection of meaningful metrics, empathetic teams and evolving technology. As Higgins, Zornes and Parakh shared in their answers, success comes not from any single measurement tool but from creating integrated systems that consistently detect, analyze and improve the interactions customers have with the brand. And when you add the right people who are able to demonstrate empathy, curiosity and adaptability, you have a winning combination of KPIs, technology and people that gets customers to say, “I’ll be back!”

Image Credit: Pexels

This article was originally published on Forbes.com

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Getting Back to Measuring What Matters

Leave a reply

Getting Back to Measuring What Matters

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

“Not everything that can be counted counts and not everything that counts can be counted,” is a quote often attributed to Albert Einstein, which I think aptly sums up the past 40 years. Since the 80s, we’ve been laser-focused on numbers and missed the underlying math. We’ve become finance-obsessed but lost track of economics.

Consider Jack Welch, who Fortune magazine named “Manager of the Century.” In the article explaining why he deserved such an honor, it lauded the CEO’s ability to increase the stock price and deliver consistent earnings growth, but nowhere did it refer to a breakthrough product or impact on society.

There’s a good reason for that. As NY Times columnist David Gelles explains in, The Man Who Broke Capitalism, Welch increased profits largely by firing workers, cutting investment and ‘financializing’ the firm. During his 20 year reign, innovation faltered and the company produced less, not more. Clearly, we need to reevaluate what we consider valuable.

What’s The Purpose Of A Company?

In a famous 1937 paper, Ronald Coase argued that the economic function of a firm was to minimize transaction costs, especially information costs. For example, it makes sense to keep employees on staff, even if you might not need them today, so that you don’t need to search for people tomorrow when important work needs to be done..

In 1976, Michael Jensen and William Meckling built on Coase’s work in their groundbreaking paper entitled The Theory of The Firm, which asserted that the purpose of the firm was to make money for its owners. They further argued that there is a fundamental principal-agency problem between managers and owners because their interests are not perfectly aligned.

These were brilliant works of economic theory, but as reflections of reality they are somewhat absurd. People start businesses for all sorts of reasons, profits being just one motivation. That’s why we have public benefit corporations and socially responsible investment funds. Heirs such as Abigail Disney have spoken out strongly against corporate greed.

There is simply no basis for the notion that owners of businesses care only about profits, much less the stock price over a given period. Yet during the 1970s and 1980s there was a growing conservative intellectual movement that argued that managers had a moral responsibility to increase shareholder value at the expense of pretty much everything else.

Today, many portray the conservative movement behind the nation of shareholder value as evil and greedy. Most of the evidence indicates that its leaders thought they were doing the right thing. It seems that there were more fundamental errors at play.

Management By Algorithm

In the 1920s , a group of intellectuals in Berlin and Vienna, became enamored by an idea that came to be known as logical positivism, that human affairs should be subjected to the same logical rigor as physical sciences. It failed miserably and, when Kurt Gödel published his incompleteness theorems in 1931, it was completely discredited.

Yet the strain of thought that arose in the 1970s that gave rise to Jack Welch’s brand of capitalism was essentially the same thing. It was, in effect, management by algorithm, in which human agency was eschewed and decisions were boiled down to a single variable to be optimized. Pretty much everything else could be blissfully ignored.

Does a particular action further the mission of the enterprise? It doesn’t matter as long as the stock price goes up. Will a merger of two companies undermine market forces and restrain trade? Unless regulators can prove that prices will go up, they have no right to step in. What should govern relations between nations? They should simply pursue their interests.

These ideas failed for the same reason that the original theory of logical positivism did. The world is a messy place, with lots going on. You can’t simply boil complex problems down to a single variable—or even a limited set—and not lose important information in the process. The notion that you could was naive and reckless.

The Cost Of Carelessness

To understand why the Welch era went so badly, let’s look at one common practice that took hold in the 1980s and 90s: Offshoring. From a shareholder value perspective, it has an intuitive logic. You move your factory from high wage countries such as the US to low wage countries such as China and pocket the savings. You lower costs and increase profits, at least in the short-term.

Yet that analysis omits some important factors. First of all, it undermines trust among employees, suppliers and other partners when relationships are treated as purely transactions. Also, a Harvard study found that moving the factory floor thousands of miles away from R&D reduces knowledge transfer and has a negative effect on innovation.

Looking back, it’s easy to see how this played out at GE. The company became more profitable, but less productive. For decades, it failed to innovate. Its last major invention was the CT scanner, which came out in the 1970s, before Jack Welch took the helm. Today the company is worth about $60 billion, roughly the same as back in the 90s.

The results for society are just as clear. Our economy has become markedly less productive, less competitive and less dynamic. Purchasing power for most people has stagnated. Life expectancy in the US has decreased in a number of years over the past decade. Anxiety and depression, which have been rising for a while, accelerated during the pandemic.

Creating Mission-Driven Organizations

The statistician George Box famously said, “All models are wrong, but some are useful” and that’s especially true of economic models. When Ronald Coase argued that the “nature of a firm” was to reduce transaction costs, he didn’t mean that was the only purpose of an enterprise. To argue that there is a principal-agent problem between owners and managers should not imply that it only applies to profits.

In fact, as Andrew Winston and Paul Polman explain in their book Net Positive, many practices that aren’t sustainable depress profits in the long run. Running an enterprise that dismisses the interests of customers, partners and communities is destined for trouble. Sooner or later, there will be a reckoning.

In the final analysis, the purpose of an enterprise is its mission. When we think of great founders such as Henry Ford, Sam Walton and Steve Jobs, they had vastly different purposes in mind, but it was fulfilling that purpose that drove profits. Ford was passionate about the power of transportation. Walton was fanatical about serving the customer. Can you imagine what Steve Jobs would have said about an ugly product that could make him a lot of money?

That’s what we’ve gotten wrong over the last 50 years. We’ve been counting the wrong things. Economics should serve people, not the other way around. The success of a society needs to be measured by the well-being of those who live in it. If companies profit, but our people are impoverished, our air and water are more polluted, our children less educated, we live unhappy lives and die deaths of despair, what have we really gained?

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Digital Customer Experience Drives Bottom Line Results

Leave a reply

Digital Customer Experience Drives Bottom Line Results

GUEST POST from Howard Tiersky

Several years ago, Jake Sorofman, from Gartner, Inc. wrote that “Customer Experience is the new battleground.”

This has been requoted numerous times by companies including Forbes, Altimeter and, McKinsey, etc. And now it looks like FROM.

Not to beat a dead horse, but are CEO’s convinced? In our experience, clients whose leadership is on board with investing in a great experience report greater financial advantages vs. those companies who are not focused on Customer Experience (CX) or are dabbling in it.

In fact, the Aberdeen Group conducted a detailed study on Aligning the Business Around a Customer. In the report, the Best in Class (BIC: defined as the top 20% of participants by reported performance) reported significant financial advantages. For example, the Year over Year (YoY) change in Company revenue is 35.4% for the BIC and 7.7% for all rest.

Other interesting findings include Customer Retention Rate: BIC 85% the rest 40%. YoY change in Customer profitability: BIC 18.2% the rest 2.9%.

Aberdeen Group Aligning Around the Customer

How do companies get results like these? Our clients don’t just fix touchpoints but use Journey Management to Innovate Exceptional Experiences that Customers Love. A simple 6 step process works:

Know your customers and their behaviors
Map their journey and identify friction points, gaps and enabling systems
Establish metrics and analytics based on your business strategy
Ideate and innovate based on new technologies, analytics, and trends
Blueprint the new experiences using a service design based method
Deploy new capabilities and implement the new journeys

6 Step Customer Journey Map Process

Of course, measurement against the metrics set up in step 3 allows us to optimize over time and keep the journey fresh. It also allows us to see potential new friction points that should be resolved. Many companies are looking at personalizing the experience, really understanding their customer behavior and building an environment for co-creation. Powered by ethnographic research, user-centered design can help to focus on what the customer wants to accomplish and how best to get the desired outcome.

So, this works for the rest of the companies, but what about the Best in Class group? Yep, the true innovation to deliver exceptional experiences is never really done. There will always be new tech, and of course, competitors and other companies are investing in their experiences and creating the next big thing.

Need more detail on the benefits of implementing a CX Operating Model and using journey management to deliver Exceptional Experiences? Here is another study that is about 15 months old, also by the Aberdeen group, that details some of the most common areas of value companies are reporting.

The Employee Engagement comparison is staggering. Companies that use Journey Management get almost 15% more employees engaged than companies who work on their journeys, but do not have a cross-silo mature management program. As you may know, engaged employees have a profound impact on the Customer experience. ROMI, Referrals and Sales Cycle Times are also areas that carry large financial rewards.

This article originally appeared on the Howard Tiersky blog

Image Credits: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Is it Time to ReLearn to Work?

1 Reply

Is it Time to ReLearn to Work?

GUEST POST from Geoffrey A. Moore

In white-collar industries where remote work is not only viable but often highly productive, we are still struggling to find a post-pandemic formula for integrating office attendance into our weekly routine. Continuing to waffle, however, does no one any good, so we need to get on with things. Part of what has been holding us back is that we have been talking about getting back to the office as an end. It is not. It is a means. The question it begs is, what is the end we have in mind? Why should we get back to the office?

Let’s start by eliminating one reason which gets frequent mention—we can manage better. This is not a good why. Supervision is an artifact of a prior era. Digitally enabled work logs itself, and we can hold each other accountable for all our KPIs, OKRs, and MBOs without having to be collocated. Managers may feel more in control with people in sight, but that is a poor return on the overall commute investment entailed.

A far better reason to return to the office is to reactivate learning. The biggest problem with remote work is that we do not learn. Specifically, we do not:

Learn anything new about ourselves, because we need the input of others to do so.
Learn new soft skills, because online courses don’t cut it.
Learn about our teammates, because video calls lack the needed intimacy.
Learn about our customers, because we need to go to their offices to do so (going to our offices would at least let us share the ride)
Learn about the current state of our company, because that kind of thing never gets published.

In short, just as our children experienced a learning gap at school, so we inherit the same dynamics with remote work. We consume the skills we have, but we do not develop the ones we need next. We are harvesting, but we are not seeding, and there will be a reckoning if we do not alter our course.

So, there is a good why for returning to the office, but that in turn begs the question of how? Here we need to be clear. We do not know how. We do not know what is the right formula. Unfortunately, waiting won’t help either, so now what?

Let me suggest that the best course of action is to implement a clear policy effective immediately with the following provisos.

We publicly acknowledge that we suspect this policy is wrong.
We are putting it in place for 90 days.
We want everyone to abide by it religiously so that we get the right signals.
We will review the policy publicly and transparently after 90 days and implement a new policy at that time.
We will put that policy in place for 90 days, following the same protocols as before.
We will rinse and repeat until no longer necessary.

The point is, we have to get on with getting on, and running the experiment is the fastest way to get there.

That’s what I think. What do you think?

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

5 Essential Customer Experience Tools to Master

Leave a reply

5 Essential Customer Experience Tools to Master

by Braden Kelley

There are so many different tools that customer experience (CX) professionals can use to identify improvement possibilities, that it can be quite overwhelming. Because CX is a human-centered discipline, it doesn’t require a lot of fancy software to do it well. Mastering these five (5) tools will help you and your customers:

1. Customer Research

Go beyond surveys and purely quantitative measures to include qualitative research that helps you uncover:

The jobs your customers are trying to get done
Insights across acquisition, usage and disposal
Their most frequently used interfaces
Their most frequent interactions
Where customers diverge from each other on these points

2. Customer Personas (Go beyond the demographics!)

Include THEIR business goals
What they need from the company
How they behave
Pain points
One or two key characteristics important for your situation (how they buy, technology they use, etc.)
What shapes their expectations of the company

3. Customer Journey Maps

Make sure you map not only the customer touchpoints and pain points, but any points where lingering actually creates value. Focus each journey map on a single customer persona.

4. Service Design Blueprints

Uncover the hidden layers of a service’s true potential. Service design blueprints can become a visionary force to steer the course of exceptional customer experiences. Weave a masterful tapestry of intricate details into a big picture that creates a clarity of execution.

5. Customer Experience Metrics

Every customer experience (CX) leadership team must decide how to measure changes in the quality of their customer experience over time. This could be customer churn, first-contact resolution, word-of-mouth, CSAT, customer effort (CES), or whatever makes sense for you.

Conclusion

The right set of customer experience (CX) tools will enable you to create a shared vision of what a better customer experience could look like and empower you to make the decisions necessary to create the changes that will realize the improvements you seek.

Great customer experience tools will also help you identify:

The moments that matter most
The tasks your employees need the most help with
The information, interactions and interfaces that are most important to your customers
Where different customer personas are the same and where you need to invest in accommodating their differences
How to efficiently prioritize your CX improvement investments

Let us help you supercharge your customer experience!

Reach out to us at:

https://www.hcltech.com/contact-us/customer

Download the Customer Experience Tools Flipbook

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of September 2023

Leave a reply

Top 10 Human-Centered Change & Innovation Articles of September 2023 Drum roll please…

At the beginning of each month, we will profile the ten articles from the previous month that generated the most traffic to Human-Centered Change & Innovation. Did your favorite make the cut?

But enough delay, here are September’s ten most popular innovation posts:

The Malcolm Gladwell Trap — by Greg Satell
Where People Go Wrong with Minimum Viable Products — by Greg Satell
Our People Metrics Are Broken — by Mike Shipulski
Why You Don’t Need An Innovation Portfolio — by Robyn Bolton
Do you have a fixed or growth mindset? — by Stefan Lindegaard
Building a Psychologically Safe Team — by David Burkus
Customer Wants and Needs Not the Same — by Shep Hyken
The Hard Problem of Consciousness is Not That Hard — by Geoffrey A. Moore
Great Coaches Do These Things — by Mike Shipulski
How Not to Get in Your Own Way — by Mike Shipulski

BONUS – Here are five more strong articles published in August that continue to resonate with people:

Three Maps to Innovation Success — by Robyn Bolton
Aligning Your Culture for Digital Transformation — by Geoffrey A. Moore
Who is to Blame for Poor Customer Service? — by Shep Hyken
3 Secrets To Good Teamwork — by David Burkus
Innovation Management ISO 56000 Series Explained — by Diana Porumboiu

If you’re not familiar with Human-Centered Change & Innovation, we publish 4-7 new articles every week built around innovation and transformation insights from our roster of contributing authors and ad hoc submissions from community members. Get the articles right in your Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin feeds too!

Have something to contribute?

Human-Centered Change & Innovation is open to contributions from any and all innovation and transformation professionals out there (practitioners, professors, researchers, consultants, authors, etc.) who have valuable human-centered change and innovation insights to share with everyone for the greater good. If you’d like to contribute, please contact me.

P.S. Here are our Top 40 Innovation Bloggers lists from the last three years:

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Measuring Employee Engagement Accurately

Leave a reply

Measuring Employee Engagement Accurately

GUEST POST from David Burkus

Employee engagement has been a hot topic for several decades. And for good reason. Business teams with highly engaged employees have a 59 percent lower turnover rate than those with less engaged staff. Highly engaged teams are 17 percent more productive. Engaged teams receive 10 percent higher customer reviews. And yes, businesses with engaged employees have higher profit margins than non-engaged competitors.

But getting employees to feel engaged is no small feat. Even how to measure employee engagement can be a difficult question to answer for many leaders. But there are good reasons to try. Measuring employee engagement helps identify cultural strengths for the organization. Done well measuring employee engagement builds trust through the company. And measuring employee engagement helps understand and respond to potential trends, both in the organization and across the industry.

In this article, we’ll outline how to measure employee engagement through the most commonly used method and offer the strengths and weaknesses of each method.

Surveys

The first method used to measure employee engagement is surveys. And this is also the most commonly used method as well—mostly for commercial reasons. After the Gallup Organization launched their original Q12 survey of engagement, dozens of competing companies with competing surveys sprung up all promising a different and better way to measure employee engagement. Most of these surveys present a series of statements and ask participants to rate how much they agree or disagree on a 5- or 7-point “Likert” scale. Some include a few open-ended questions as well.

The biggest strength of the survey method is that it scales easily. For an organization with hundreds or thousands of employees, emailing out a survey invitation and letting the system do the rest of the work saves a lot of time. In addition, surveys allow for objective comparisons between teams and divisions, or between the company and an industry benchmark. But while the comparisons may be objective, the data itself may not be. That’s the biggest weakness of surveys, they most often rely on self-reported data. And as a result, those taking the survey may not be completely honest, either because they want to feel more engaged or because they don’t trust the survey to be truly anonymous.

Proxies

The second method used to measure employee engagement is proxies—meaning other metrics that serve as a proxy for engagement. Because we know that employee engagement correlates to other measurements, we can assume a certain level of engagement based off those measurements. For example, productivity has a strong correlation to employee engagement when looking at teams or entire organizations. So, if productivity is high, it’s safe to assume employee engagement isn’t low. Likewise, absenteeism and turnover tend to rise as employee engagement falls, so changes over time on those metrics point to changes over time in engagement. (And comparisons between engagement in departments/teams can sometimes be made based on these proxies.)

The big strength of proxies is that they’re usually measurements that are already being captured. Larger organizations are already tracking productivity, turnover, and more and so the data are already there. The weaknesses of proxy measurements, however, are that they’re not a perfect correlation. It’s possible to be productive but not engaged, and there are often other reasons certain roles have higher turnover than others beyond employee engagement. In addition, some of these proxies are lagging indicators—if turnover is increasing than engagement has already fallen—and so they don’t provide leaders a chance to respond as fast.

Interviews

The third method used to measure employee engagement is interviews. And this method is the least common one but it’s growing in usage. Sometimes these are called “stay” interviews, in contrast to the exit interviews that are common practice in organizations. The idea is to regularly interview employees who are staying about how the company (and leaders) are doing and how things could be improved. While the questions used should provide some structure, the open-ended nature allows leaders to discover potentially unknown areas for improvement.

The biggest strength of stay interviews is that they’re a useful method for team leaders who may not have senior leader support for measuring engagement. Conducting stay interviews with ones’ team doesn’t require senior leadership approval or data from Human Resources. So, it’s available to leaders at all levels. And while that’s true, the weakness of stay interviews is that they’re hard to scale. Training thousands of managers on conducting a stay interview isn’t as easy as emailing out a survey. Moreover, because different managers would conduct these interviews differently, cross-comparison would be subject to bias. Stay interviews are a powerful way to measure engagement on a team, but they’re most potent when they’re used by managers who truly want the feedback their team provides (and not merely because they were told to conduct interviews).

Conclusion

While all three methods are a way to measure employee engagement, it’s not enough to merely measure. We measure things so we can improve them. So once the measurement is done, leaders need to have a plan in place make progress. That plan should include sharing out the results of the measurement and sharing the lessons learned from analyzing those results. In addition, leaders should share what changes are planned based on those lessons. And while it doesn’t need to be shared, it’s worth thinking ahead of time how the effects of those changes will be themselves be measured.

Done well, these measurements and the resulting plans will create an environment where everyone can do their best work ever.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.