Category Archives: Uncategorized

Revolutions Never Begin with a Slogan

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenski has been compared to great orators like Winston Churchill. He vowed to the English House of Commons to fight “in the forests, in the fields, on the shores, in the streets.” In a speech to the US Congress he told President Biden, “Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace.”

While new to politics, Zelensky is no neophyte when it comes to delivering a line. A longtime actor and comic who was the voice of “Paddington” in the Ukrainian adaptations of the hit movie, his production company Kvartal 95 produced a series of hits. It would be easy to boil his effectiveness down to his communication skills.

That would be a mistake. Zelenski’s eloquence derives its power from the plight of his people, their passion for freedom and their unwillingness to return to an often troubled past. One reason why change so often fails is that we spend so much time focusing on wordsmithing that we neglect why the need for change arose in the first place. That is where we must start.

Gandhi’s Satyagraha

As a young man, Mohandis Gandhi wasn’t the type of person you would notice. Impulsive and undisciplined, he was also so shy as a young lawyer that he could hardly bring himself to speak in open court. With his law career failing, he accepted an offer to represent the cousin of a wealthy muslim merchant in South Africa.

Upon his arrival, Gandhi was subjected to humiliation on a train and it changed him. His sense of dignity offended, he decided to fight back. Yet he would do so not by attacking his enemies, but by targeting his own weaknesses. The aim, as he put it, was “the vindication of truth not by affliction of suffering on the opponent, but on one’s self.”

His method of Satyagraha was not passive resistance as commonly understood, which he considered a “weapon of the weak.” In fact, it was extremely strategic. Its aim was to undermine his opponents legitimacy and, in doing so, their freedom of action. He sought to back them into a corner in which both action and inaction would yield essentially the same result —an upending of the existing order.

At its core, Satyagraha is intended to be a quest for truth. The aim is to get your opponents to confront themselves. As the South African leader Jan Smuts would put it. “It was my fate to be the antagonist of a man for whom even then I had the highest respect… For me — the defender of law and order — there was the usual trying situation, the odium of carrying out the law, which had not strong popular support.”

Stalin’s Gift That Just Kept Giving

One of the first things a visitor to Warsaw will notice is the Palace of Culture. When arrived in the country in 1997, it dominated the skyline. A replica of the Seven Sisters buildings in Moscow, it was forced upon the Polish people by Stalin in 1955 and for decades it served as a reminder of Soviet domination.

I remember attending a business meeting there where my host pointed out that it had the best view in Warsaw, because it was the only place where you couldn’t see the Palace of Culture. Its tower had the feel of Sauron, the evil force in J. R. R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings series. It was more than just a foreign presence at the heart of the capital city. It was an all-watching eye, a reminder that Poles’ lives were not fully their own.

We remember the Solidarity movement in Poland as a struggle for labor against communism and economics were certainly part of it. But the larger grievance was encapsulated in the Palace of Culture, the feeling of being completely subjugated by another nation. Poles felt it deeply and never truly accepted Soviet rule.

Much like Gandhi on the train, it was that emotional sense of injury that pushed the Polish people to be passionate about change and it is similar forces that propel the Ukrainians now. Vladimir Putin, much like Stalin before him, has unwittingly empowered his own opposition by failing to recognize their identity and attempting to subjugate their identity,

Today, the Palace of Culture still stands, albeit enfeebled by the modern skyscrapers bustling with commercial activity, that surround and obscure it.

Steve Jobs and the Products That Sucked

Steve Jobs didn’t believe in market research. He once explained, “Our job is to figure out what they’re going to want before they do. I think Henry Ford once said, ‘If I’d ask customers what they wanted, they would’ve told me a faster horse.’ People don’t know what they want until you show it to them.” That’s why he didn’t start out with a product idea, but something that “sucked”

Computers sucked. They were ugly and hard to use. That’s what drove him to create the Macintosh. Music players sucked. He wanted something that would put 1000 songs in his pocket. That’s what drove him to create the iPod. Phones sucked. That’s what drove him to create the iPhone. Much like Gandhi’s humiliation and the Palace of culture, these things offended his sensibilities.

If you want to create change in this world, you need to identify a grievance that people care about. Because if people don’t see a problem, they’re not going to care about your solution. It doesn’t matter if it’s in your team, your organization, your industry or throughout society as a whole. Change isn’t about ideas, it’s about solving meaningful problems.

When we begin to work with a leadership team on a transformational initiative, we always start out asking about what problem they are trying to solve. Often, they don’t know. There are so many wonderful things to adopt that it’s easy to fall into the trap of identifying a solution before you’ve actually defined a problem.

Don’t Let Talking About Change Undermine Your Ability to Achieve It

Every leader wants to be seen at the vanguard of change. The truth is, it’s relatively easy to announce a change initiative, hire vendors to implement new technologies and then bring in change consultants to hone messaging and arrange training, but these things are unlikely to bring about successful transformation.

In fact, evidence suggests that all of the talk about change may be undermining our ability to achieve it. One survey found that 44% of employees say they don’t understand the change they’re being asked to make, and 38% say they don’t agree with it. A clear majority, 65% of respondents complained of “change fatigue.”

Change doesn’t begin with an idea. It starts with identifying a meaningful problem. That’s why it’s so important that before you start an initiative you ask questions like, ask questions like, “What problem are we trying to solve? Is there a general consensus that it’s a problem we need to solve? How would solving it impact our business?

When we look at transformational leaders who achieved great things, the first thing we tend to notice is their words, not the cause that compelled them to act. The words are easy to replicate. Anyone can speak them. But If you want to create change in this world, you need to identify a grievance that people care about. Because if people don’t see a problem, they’re not going to care about your solution.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credits: Pexels

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Continuous Improvement vs. Incremental Innovation

Leave a reply

Are They the Same?

Continuous Improvement vs. Incremental Innovation

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

“Isn’t continuous improvement the same as incremental innovation? After all, both focus on doing what you do better, faster, or cheaper.”

Ooof, I have a love-hate relationship with questions like this one.

I hate them because, in the moment, they feel like a gut punch. The answer feels obvious to me – no, they are entirely different things – but I struggle to explain myself clearly and simply.

I love them because, once the frustration and embarrassment of being unable to offer a clear and simple answer passes, they become a clear sign that I don’t understand something well enough or that *gasp* my “obvious” answer may be wrong.

So, is Continuous Improvement the same as Incremental Innovation?

No. They’re different.

But the difference is subtle, so let’s use an analogy to tease it apart.

Imagine learning to ride a bike. When you first learn, success is staying upright, moving forward, and stopping before you crash into something. With time and practice, you get better. You move faster, stop more quickly, and move with greater precision and agility.

That’s continuous improvement. You’re using the same solution but using it better.

Now, imagine that you’ve mastered your neighborhood’s bike paths and streets and want to do more. You want to go faster, so add a motor to your bike. You want to ride through the neighboring forest, so you change to off-road tires. You want a smoother feel on your long rides, so you switch to a carbon fiber frame.

That’s incremental innovation. You changed an aspect of the solution so that it performs better.

It all comes down to the definition of innovation – something different (or new) that creates value.

Both continuous improvement and incremental innovation create value.

The former does it by improving what exists. The latter does it by changing (making different) what exists.

Got it. They are entirely different things.

Sort of.

Think of them as a Venn diagram – they’re different but similar.

There is evidence that a culture committed to quality and continuous improvement can lead to a culture of innovation because “Both approaches are focused in meeting customer needs, and since CI encourages small but constant changes in current products, processes and working methods its use can lead firms to become innovative by taking these small changes as an approach to innovation, more specifically, incremental innovation.”

Thanks, nerd. But does this matter where I work, which is in the real world?

Yes.

Continuous Improvement and Incremental Innovation are different things and, as a result, require different resource levels, timelines, and expectations for ROI.

You should expect everyone in your organization to engage in continuous innovation (CI) because (1) using CI helps the organizations change adoption and risk taking by evaluating and implementing solutions to current needs” and (2) the problem-solving tools used in CI uncover “opportunities for finding new ideas that could become incremental innovations.”

You should designate specific people and teams to work on incremental people because (1) what “better” looks like is less certain, (2) doing something different or new increases risk, and (3) more time and resources are required to learn your way to the more successful outcome.

What do you think?

How do you answer the question at the start of this post?

How do you demonstrate your answer?

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovativeness = Effectiveness

1 Reply

Innovativeness = Effectiveness

GUEST POST from Dennis Stauffer

What makes you effective? Is it your knowledge and experience? Is it your commitment? Is it perhaps luck sometimes? Simply put: Being effective is about making what you want to happen, happen. It’s about shaping the world around you to fit your hopes and dreams, and aspirations. About creating your desired future. That means something needs to change, or why bother, right? And when something needs to change, what you’re really doing is a form of innovation.

Your innovativeness and your effectiveness are closely intertwined. Becoming more innovative makes you more effective and therefore more successful. Both personal attributes are enhanced as you become more creative, imaginative, resourceful and observant. As you become more skilled at managing the inevitable changes we all confront, you’re better positioned to find—and lead—your way through them.

Innovation and effectiveness both demand that you’re able to somehow account for the realities you face, while at the same time shifting those realities. This world is a dynamic place, it’s always fluid and evolving. You need to align with those changes, even as you attempt to make changes.

Whether you’re launching a new product or venture, trying to advance your career, or maybe start—or repair—a personal relationship, your challenge is not to just go do what needs to be done. It’s to figure out what needs to be done, to get to where you want to be. In other words, effectiveness and innovativeness are complementary. To be effective, you need to be innovative, and the more innovative you are, the more effective you’re likely to be.

Here is a video version of this post:

The Innovator Mindset YouTube channel brings you weekly tips, tricks and insights into how to be more creative, innovative, resourceful imaginative and open–all the things that innovation requires, and that you need to be effective.

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Other Experiences Exist Beyond Customer Experience

Leave a reply

Other Experiences Exist Beyond Customer Experience

GUEST POST from Shep Hyken

CX is the abbreviation for customer experience. Somehow, someone decided X is a better abbreviation for experience than E is. Regardless, I’ve started seeing the X being used in other ways. For example, there is UX, or user experience, which is the experience the customer has with your products and services. Here are some others that you may have heard of:

EX is to employees as CX is to customers. The employee experience is an important experience to manage. What’s happening on the inside is felt by customers on the outside.
WX stands for web experience. What experience do your customers have with your website? The WX is a very important part of the UX.
DX stands for digital experience. This is what customers experience when they interact with your company online. This could be on a website, on the Internet or with a bot. We must manage the DX if we want our customers to have a good CX.

Shep Hyken CX Jargon Cartoon

These got my imagination going, and I decided to share a few others that I’ve come up with:

NX is for the nap experience. This is the comfortable place employees might enjoy a short nap during a stressful day.
YX is for the yawn experience. On a scale of one to 10, how likely are customers and employees to yawn during a meeting or presentation?
PX stands for the procrastination experience, in which we rate our frustration when people don’t get things done on time.
RX is currently recognized as the abbreviation for a prescription. It originates from the Latin word “recipe,” meaning “to take,” as in a prescription. But, I’m assigning RX to the restroom experience. When I was looking for office space, I always checked out the restroom to see how well it was maintained. I assumed if they took good care of the restrooms, they would take care of the building.

You get the idea. The X’s—or experiences—in our lives can be labeled. Here’s an assignment for you. What are the different experiences your customers and employees have? Label them. Create an acronym. Have fun with them. And they don’t have to be just two words. Like CXE, which stands for customer experience excuse, the reason someone failed to deliver a good CX.

Once you come up with these abbreviations, don’t use them with your customers unless there is an obvious reason to do so. Using company jargon, acronyms and abbreviations the customer might not understand can be frustrating for them. However, if there is a fun one that, once you explain, will make your customers smile, go ahead and share. You’ll get a smile and your customers will know that you are thinking of them and always looking for ways to improve their eXperience.

Image Credits: Shep Hyken, Pexels

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Do you ever admit you don’t know?

Leave a reply

Do you ever admit you don't know?

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

When you are asked a question and you don’t know the answer, what do you say? What does that say about you?

What happens to people in your organization who say “I don’t know.”? Are they lauded or laughed at? Are they promoted, overlooked, or demoted? How many people do you know that have said: “I don’t know.”? And what does that say about your company?

When you know someone doesn’t know, what do you do? Do you ask them a pointed question in public to make everyone aware that the person doesn’t know? Do you ask oblique questions to raise doubt about the person’s knowing? Do you ask them a question in private to help them know they don’t know? Do you engage in an informal discussion where you plant the seeds of knowing? And how do you feel about your actions?

When you say “I don’t know.” you make it safe for others to say it. So, do you say it? And how do you feel about that?

When you don’t know and you say otherwise, decision quality suffers and so does the company. Yet, some companies make it difficult for people to say “I don’t know.” Why is that? Do you know?

I think it’s unreasonable to expect people to know the answer to know the answers to all questions at all times. And when you say “I don’t know.” it doesn’t mean you’ll never know; it means you don’t know at this moment. And, yet, it’s difficult to say it. Why is that? Do you know?

Just because someone asks a question doesn’t mean the answer must be known right now. It’s often premature to know the answer, and progress is not hindered by the not knowing. Why not make progress and figure out the answer when it’s time for the answer to be known? And sometimes the answer is unknowable at the moment. And that says nothing about the person that doesn’t know the answer and everything about the moment.

It’s okay if you don’t know the answer. What’s not okay is saying you know when you don’t. And it’s not okay if your company makes it difficult for you to say you don’t know. Not only does that create a demoralized workforce, but it’s also bad for business.

Why do companies make it so difficult to say “I don’t know.”? You guessed it – I don’t know.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

3 Flavors of Product-Service Shift

Leave a reply

Which One is Yours?

3 Flavors of Product-Service Shift

GUEST POST from Geoffrey A. Moore

The most profound change in enterprise computing in this century to date has been the shift in value delivery modality from product to service and the corresponding rise is XaaS or Everything-as-a-Service. The current bull market leaders in the tech sector take this for granted, and the prior generation of incumbents are still scrambling to get themselves onto the new model. For consumers this is an all-upside proposition; for enterprises, it is a balancing act of open fluidity versus secure compliance. But everyone seems to know their place in the new order—or do they?

As the product-service shift unfolds, it can manifest itself at three very different levels of value delivery, each of which has its own priorities. When you are looking to help your organization navigate the transition, it would be good to get clear as to which path you are on:

1. Infrastructure Model Transformation

This is the easiest to absorb, the impact for the most part contained on the vendor side within Finance and Legal and on the customer side within the IT organization itself. Basically, all you are doing is changing the contract from a license to a service level agreement, and staging a series of leasing payments out of op ex instead a one-time purchase out of cap ex. For clarity sake, think of this as a move to subscription, not yet to For most people in the organization, it is a non-event.

2. Operating Model Transformation

This move has the most impact on incumbent vendors and their installed base. As Todd Hewlin and J B Wood described in Consumption Economics, the shift is based on a change from the customer to the vendor as the one who must absorb goal attainment risk. In a product model, once the customer has bought and paid for it, the customer owns virtually all the risk. That can readily lead to a lot of drive-by selling, the sort of thing that built out empires of shelfware in the late 1990s. In a service model, by contrast, the vendor can never stop owning the success of the offering, not if they want to protect against their installed base churning out from underneath them. This is the true product-service shift, and even now it is sufficiently novel that both customers and vendors are still sorting out the implications for what staffing and expertise is needed on both sides of this relationship.

3. Business Model Transformation

This is the most impactful for venture-backed start-ups and the incumbent franchises they are looking to disrupt. Typically the former are re-architecting an established but aging value chain by substituting digital services for physical-world interactions. The biggest disruptions we have seen thus far are in retail, print media, financial services, transportation, hospitality, and communications, with lots more to come. They all represent daggers pointed at the heart of established enterprises because even when the latter can find ways to re-engineer their own offers to match the new paradigm, it is still painfully hard to bring the rest of their ecosystems up to speed to deliver the whole product. And to a lesser extent, the same goes for their customer bases. That is why disruption usually starts with targeting customers who have been disenfranchised by the old solution. It is only over time that the Innovator’s Dilemma bill comes to for the established vendors, but when it does, it hits with a wallop.

For most companies, the path you want to double-click on is the Operating Model Transformation, and in the next post, I want to dig in a lot deeper there.

That’s what I think. What do you think?

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.3

Anticipating and Mitigating Innovation Risks

Leave a reply

The Unintended Consequences

Anticipating and Mitigating Innovation Risks

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the exhilarating rush of creation, we often celebrate innovation as an unmitigated good. We focus on the problem solved, the need met, and the market disrupted. But as a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I am here to challenge that narrow perspective. Every new product, every disruptive service, and every breakthrough technology casts a shadow — a trail of unforeseen consequences that can range from minor inconvenience to societal-level disruption. True innovation leadership is not just about solving today’s problems; it’s about anticipating the ripple effects of your solution and taking proactive steps to mitigate potential harm. The greatest innovators are not just brilliant creators; they are also responsible stewards of the future they are building.

The paradox of progress is that our focus on a single, positive outcome often blinds us to the broader systemic impact. We drop a stone in a pond, focused solely on the satisfying splash, and fail to see the ripples that wash up on distant shores. This lack of foresight is not a moral failing, but a cognitive one. Our brains are wired for a singular focus, which is excellent for solving complex problems but poor for considering the peripheral damage. To build a more resilient and ethical future, we must intentionally embed a new practice into our innovation process—one of anticipating and mitigating unintended consequences from the very beginning.

A Human-Centered Framework for Responsible Innovation

Moving beyond a naive optimism requires a new framework for innovation—one that is built on ethical foresight and systemic thinking. Here’s how you can proactively address the risks of your next big idea:

Conduct a “Worst-Case” Brainstorm: Gather your innovation team and intentionally brainstorm all the negative outcomes. What’s the worst-case scenario? Who could be harmed? How could this be misused? This exercise isn’t meant to stop the project, but to expose potential vulnerabilities and build resilience into the design.
Practice Systemic Empathy: Go beyond your direct user. Map out the entire ecosystem your innovation will enter. How will it affect competitors, adjacent industries, communities, and even the planet? The goal is to develop empathy for every stakeholder in the system, not just the one you’re designing for.
Design with a Moral Compass: Build ethical considerations into your design principles. Is your product a tool for connection or a platform for division? Is it creating value for everyone in the supply chain or just the end user? These questions should guide your decisions, not just be addressed in a post-mortem.
Build for Transparency and Control: Empower your users. Give them clear, easy-to-understand controls over their data and experience. When people feel a sense of agency, they are more likely to trust your platform and less likely to feel exploited by an unforeseen consequence.

“The best innovations are not just profitable; they are wise. They create the future without leaving a wake of unaddressed problems.”

Case Study 1: The Social Media Revolution – The Unforeseen Cost of Connection

The Intended Consequence:

In the early days, platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube were designed with a clear and noble purpose: to connect the world, give a voice to the voiceless, and foster a global community. The goal was to break down barriers and create a more open and connected society. This was the “splash” that captivated the world.

The Unintended Consequences:

As these platforms grew, a dark side emerged. The design choices, particularly the algorithms that prioritized engagement and virality, led to a cascade of unforeseen consequences: the proliferation of misinformation and fake news, increased social and political polarization, a rise in cyberbullying and online harassment, and a measurable negative impact on the mental health of users, particularly adolescents. These unintended consequences were not malicious; they were the direct result of a lack of ethical foresight and systemic thinking. The companies were so focused on optimizing for a single metric—user engagement—that they failed to consider the human and societal harm it would cause. The trust that was once a given for these platforms is now a major challenge.

The Lesson:

The social media story is a cautionary tale for all innovators. It teaches us that a single-minded focus on a positive outcome can create a new set of complex and damaging problems. It shows that the true measure of an innovation’s success is not just its adoption, but its long-term impact on the world. Ethical foresight is not a luxury; it is a fundamental requirement for building a responsible and sustainable technology.

Case Study 2: The E-Scooter Boom – Navigating Urban Chaos

The Intended Consequence:

When companies like Lime and Bird launched their e-scooter services, their purpose was clear and positive: to provide an efficient, fun, and eco-friendly “last-mile” transportation solution for urban commuters. The goal was to reduce traffic congestion and carbon emissions. The initial reception was enthusiastic, and the model spread rapidly across cities worldwide.

The Unintended Consequences:

The sudden influx of thousands of scooters led to a wave of unforeseen problems. They were left haphazardly on sidewalks, creating accessibility hazards for people with disabilities and a safety nightmare for pedestrians. Injuries from falls and collisions soared. Cities were unprepared to regulate the new technology, leading to public outrage and, in many cases, a swift ban of the services. The innovators were so focused on the user experience of the ride itself that they failed to consider the broader system of the urban environment they were disrupting.

The Lesson:

The e-scooter case is a powerful example of how a failure of systemic thinking can derail a promising innovation. While the companies had a good intention, they did not adequately consider the impact on the public right-of-way, city regulations, and the safety of non-users. In response, they have since had to pivot and collaborate with cities to create designated parking zones, improve safety features, and build better relationships with local governments. This case demonstrates that proactively engaging with all stakeholders—not just your target consumer—is essential to mitigate risk and ensure long-term viability.

Conclusion: The Ethical Imperative of Innovation

Innovation is humanity’s greatest engine of progress, but it is not without its risks. The most powerful innovations of the future will be those that are not only technologically brilliant but also ethically wise. As leaders and innovators, our most critical role is to move beyond the narrow focus of problem-solving and embrace a broader responsibility to the systems and people we impact.

The next time you are building something new, take a moment to look at its shadow. Ask the difficult questions. Challenge your assumptions. And remember that the most profound and lasting change is not just about what you create, but how you create it—with foresight, with empathy, and with an unwavering commitment to leaving the world better than you found it. The future depends on it.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Emotional Well-being as a Pillar of Employee Experience

Leave a reply

Emotional Well-being as a Pillar of Employee Experience

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the ever-evolving landscape of work, organizations are increasingly recognizing that fostering a positive employee experience is crucial. Traditionally, companies focused on tangible benefits like compensation and office perks. However, it is becoming clearer that emotional well-being is fundamental to a holistic employee experience. As a thought leader in change and innovation, I am committed to exploring how organizations can integrate emotional well-being into their core strategies for sustainable growth and employee satisfaction.

The Importance of Emotional Well-being

Emotional well-being refers to an individual’s ability to manage and express emotions healthily. In the workplace, it impacts productivity, creativity, and overall job satisfaction. Employees who feel emotionally supported are more engaged, motivated, and loyal. Thus, emotional well-being is not just a benefit but a strategic pillar in crafting an exceptional employee experience.

Case Study #1: Google’s Comprehensive Mental Health Program

Google, known for its pioneering employee policies, has been at the forefront of integrating emotional well-being into the employee experience. The company recognized that stress and mental health issues were affecting productivity and employee satisfaction.

Google’s approach includes a comprehensive mental health program that offers resources such as counseling services, stress management workshops, and meditation classes. They also provide tools and platforms for ongoing peer support.

The results have been impressive. Google reports increased employee retention and engagement scores, along with a noticeable decrease in burnout-related issues. The company’s success underscores the importance of addressing emotional well-being proactively.

Case Study #2: Salesforce’s Ohana Culture

Salesforce has adopted the Hawaiian concept of “Ohana,” meaning family, to craft a nurturing and supportive workplace environment. This culture emphasizes empathy, mutual support, and open communication as central to the employee experience.

Salesforce’s initiatives include offering personalized mental health resources such as therapy sessions and wellness reimbursements. They also conduct regular mental health surveys to tailor support to employee needs effectively.

By treating employees like family, Salesforce has achieved remarkable results. Employee satisfaction scores are high, and the company has become recognized as one of the best places to work globally. Salesforce’s approach highlights how cultural integration of emotional well-being can lead to profound organizational benefits.

Integrating Emotional Well-being into Organizational Strategy

To successfully integrate emotional well-being into the employee experience, organizations must move beyond traditional benefits and adopt a holistic approach:

Leadership Commitment: Senior leaders must champion emotional well-being initiatives, demonstrating commitment from the top levels of management.
Tailored Programs: Programs should be adaptable to meet diverse employee needs, considering varying cultural and personal backgrounds.
Open Communication: Encourage open dialogue about mental health to de-stigmatize these discussions and foster a supportive environment.
Continuous Feedback: Regularly solicit employee feedback to adapt and improve emotional well-being initiatives.

Conclusion

As organizations strive to innovate and remain competitive, embedding emotional well-being into the employee experience is not merely an option but a necessity. The insights from Google and Salesforce demonstrate that when employees feel emotionally supported, companies benefit in terms of productivity, retention, and reputation.

Empowering employees to thrive emotionally creates a ripple effect that enhances business performance and contributes to a more humane and sustainable workplace culture. By prioritizing emotional well-being, companies can build a workforce that is not only successful but truly fulfilled.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Impacting Communities via Innovation Empowerment

Leave a reply

Impacting Communities via Innovation Empowerment

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s rapidly evolving world, innovation is much more than just a corporate buzzword; it is a foundational element for empowering people and transforming communities. When harnessed effectively, innovation can catalyze positive changes that generate long-term social, economic, and environmental benefits. This article explores how communities can be empowered through innovation by focusing on collaborative efforts that engage citizens as co-creators of sustainable solutions. We will delve into two inspiring case studies highlighting creative empowerment strategies that have yielded significant impacts.

Case Study 1: Solar Sister – Harnessing the Sun to Empower Women

Solar Sister is a remarkable case study demonstrating how innovation can empower an entire community. Founded with the mission of eradicating energy poverty while promoting women’s entrepreneurship, Solar Sister has become a beacon of hope across Sub-Saharan Africa. By equipping women with clean energy technology such as solar-powered lamps and phone chargers, this initiative not only addresses critical energy shortages but also provides economic opportunities.

Solar Sister’s approach is both simple and profound: train, support, and mentor women as they build clean energy businesses in their communities. This model not only ensures widespread access to affordable, reliable clean energy but also empowers women by providing them with leadership skills, financial independence, and increased social standing. The innovation lies in its grassroots-driven approach that turns beneficiaries into active participants in transforming their own communities.

“Solar Sister illuminates the lives of women and their communities through the power of the sun, demonstrating that sustainable energy solutions can come from the most unlikely innovators.”

The impact of Solar Sister has been widespread. Thousands of women entrepreneurs have joined the movement, providing clean energy to over one million people. The benefits extend beyond individual families, impacting the environment by reducing dependency on kerosene and diminishing carbon emissions, thus helping fight climate change.

Case Study 2: CityBee – Redefining Urban Mobility

In Lithuania, urban mobility innovation is revolutionizing how communities interact with their cities, thanks to CityBee. Recognizing the traffic congestion and pollution challenges faced by modern cities, CityBee devised a car-sharing service that blends technology, community involvement, and sustainable transportation solutions.

CityBee’s model is incredibly intuitive: through an app, users can locate and unlock cars or bikes, use them for short trips, and park them at strategic city locations. This service reduces the necessity for private vehicle ownership, alleviates parking demands, and decreases urban air pollution. CityBee reimagines mobility as a flexible, on-demand service that embraces technological innovation to meet the evolving needs of urban dwellers.

The community impact has been profound. By championing a shared economy model, CityBee has encouraged users to fundamentally change how they perceive transportation—shifting from ownership to access. This transformation not only positions cities as spaces designed for people rather than vehicles but also empowers communities to participate in more sustainable urban living practices.

“Innovative solutions like CityBee prove that rethinking and reshaping urban mobility isn’t just a possibility—it’s a necessity for sustainable, vibrant city landscapes.”

Innovative Pathways to Empowerment

The profound lessons from these two case studies underscore the limitless potential of innovation as a mechanism for empowerment. By involving communities in innovation processes, leveraging locally driven solutions, and fostering inclusive environments that uplift underrepresented voices, we can ensure sustainable development and community well-being.

Communities empowered through innovation are better equipped to navigate the complexities of the modern world—transforming challenges into opportunities, sparking economic vibrancy, and nurturing social cohesion. As we continue to explore and harness the boundless potentials of innovation, our commitment to human-centered design should remain steadfast. By creating platforms for shared learning, meaningful engagement, and collaborative co-creation, we lay the foundation for empowered, resilient communities.

Conclusion

Empowerment through innovation is not just an ideal; it is a pragmatic strategy for fostering sustainable growth and collective responsibility across our diverse global communities. As demonstrated by Solar Sister and CityBee, the innovative forces that empower individuals simultaneously invigorate the communities they inhabit. By prioritizing people-centric innovation and nurturing community involvement, we catalyze positive changes that transcend generations. Together, let us embrace the transformative power of innovation as a conduit for empowerment and social good, nurturing a world where communities thrive, and hope flourishes.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Building an Adaptable Organization with Change Resilience

Leave a reply

Building an Adaptable Organization with Change Resilience

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations must cultivate the ability to adapt swiftly to change while remaining resilient. This adaptability is not just about surviving change but thriving through it. Leadership strategies and cultural transformation play crucial roles in shaping an adaptable organization. This article explores practical approaches and showcases case studies of organizations that have successfully integrated change resilience into their DNA.

Leadership Strategies: Guiding Through Change

Effective leadership is the cornerstone of any successful change management strategy. Leaders must not only drive change but also inspire their teams to embrace it. A key strategy involves developing change resilience among leaders themselves. This involves training them to manage uncertainty and equip their teams with the tools to navigate challenges.

A more in-depth exploration of how to develop these skills can be found in my article on Building Resilience in Change Leaders.

Case Study 1: Tech Innovators, Inc.

Tech Innovators, Inc. is a prime example of how leadership strategies can foster an adaptable organization. Facing the threat of obsolescence in a competitive market, the company embarked on a comprehensive leadership development program. This program focused on agility, equipping leaders with the skills to manage change proactively.

The result? A cultural shift that permeated the organization, enabling teams to innovate rapidly and respond to market shifts with unparalleled agility. Leadership became a collective endeavor, tapping into diverse insights to drive strategic decisions. By championing resilience at every level, Tech Innovators, Inc. fortified itself against future disruptions.

Cultural Transformation: Embedding Resilience

Beyond leadership, cultural transformation is critical in building an adaptable organization. A resilient culture is characterized by open communication, psychological safety, and a shared vision of change as an opportunity.

Embedding resilience into the company culture starts by nurturing it among employees. Encouraging employees to view change as a gateway to growth instills a sense of empowerment. For more insights on nurturing resilience in employees, consider reading Nurturing Resilience in Employees During Periods of Change.

Case Study 2: Global Retail Giant

The journey of a global retail giant illustrates the transformative impact of reshaping organizational culture. Confronted with an unpredictable market and a rapidly evolving consumer landscape, this retail giant prioritized building a culture of resilience.

By investing in continuous learning and fostering a collaborative environment, the company empowered its employees to spearhead innovation. Regular feedback loops and transparent communication bridged the gap between leadership and staff, creating a unified front poised to adapt seamlessly.

The outcome was a rejuvenated workforce, capable not only of managing change but leveraging it strategically to gain a competitive edge. The organization’s adaptive culture became a magnet for top talent, further reinforcing its market position.

Conclusion

In an era defined by volatility, building an adaptable organization requires a dual focus on leadership strategies and cultural transformation. As demonstrated by the experiences of Tech Innovators, Inc. and the global retail giant, resilience can be developed at both individual and organizational levels, positioning companies to thrive amidst change.

The path to becoming an adaptable organization is not without challenges. However, with the right strategies and cultural backbone, organizations can transform adversity into opportunity—emerging stronger and more resilient in the face of an uncertain future.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.