Category Archives: Creativity

You Can’t Innovate Without This One Thing

You Can't Innovate Without This One Thing

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

It just landed on your desk. Or maybe you campaigned to get it. Or perhaps you just started doing it. How the title of “Innovation Leader” got to your desk doesn’t matter nearly as much as the fact that it’s there, along with a budget and loads of expectations.

Of course, now that you have the title and the budget, you need a team to do the work and deliver the results.

Who should you look for? The people that perform well in the current business, with its processes, structures, and (relative) predictability, often struggle to navigate the constant uncertainty and change of innovation. But just because someone struggles in the process and structure of the core business doesn’t mean they’ll thrive creating something new.

What are the qualities that make someone a successful innovator?

70 answers

A lot of people have a lot to say about the qualities and characteristics that make someone an innovator. When you combine the first four Google search results for “characteristics of an innovator” with the five most common innovation talent assessments, you end up with a list of 70 different (and sometimes conflicting) traits.

The complete list is at the end of this article, but here are the characteristics that appeared more than once:

Curious
Persistent
Continuously reflective
Creative
Driven
Experiments
Imaginative
Passionate

It’s a good list, but remember, there are 62 other characteristics to consider. And that assumes that the list is exhaustive.

+1 Answer

It’s not. Something is missing.

There is one characteristic shared by every successful innovator I’ve worked with and every successful leader of innovation. It’s rarely the first (or second or third) word used to describe them, but eventually, it emerges, always said quietly, after great reflection and with dawning realization.

Vulnerability.

Whether you rolled your eyes or pumped your fist at the word made famous by Brene Brown, you’ve no doubt heard it and formed an opinion about it.

Vulnerability is the “quality or state of being exposed to the possibility of being attacked or harmed, either physically or emotionally.” Without it, innovation is impossible.

Innovation requires the creation of something new that creates value. If something is new, some or all of it is unknown. If there are unknowns, there are risks. Where there are risks, there is the possibility of being wrong, which opens you up to attack or harm.

When you talk to people to understand their needs, vulnerability allows you to hear what they say (versus what you want them to say).

In brainstorming sessions, vulnerability enables you to speak up and suggest an idea for people to respond to, build on, or discard.

When you run experiments, vulnerability ensures that you accurately record and report the data, even if the results aren’t what you hoped.

Most importantly, as a leader, vulnerability inspires trust, motivates your team, engages your stakeholders, and creates the environment and culture required to explore, learn, and innovate continuously.

n + 1 is the answer

Just as you do for every job in your company, recruit the people with the skills required to do the work and the mindset and personality to succeed in your business’ context and culture.

Once you find them, make sure they’re willing to be vulnerable and support and celebrate others’ vulnerability. Then, and only then, will you be the innovators your company needs.

Here’s the full list of characteristics:

Action-oriented, gets the job done
Adaptable
Ambitious
Analytical, high information capacity, digs through facts
Associative Thinker, makes uncommon connections
Breaks Boundaries, disruptive
Business minded
Collaborative
Compelling Leader
Competitive
Consistent
Continuously reflects (x3)
Courageous
Creative (x3)
Curious (x4), asks questions, inquisitive, investigates
Delivers results, seeks tangible outcomes
Disciplined
Divergent Thinker
Driven (x3)
Energetic
Experiments (x2)
Financially oriented
Flexible, fluid
Formally educated and trained
Futuristic
Giving, works to benefit others, wants to make the world better
Goal-oriented
Has a Growth mindset
Highly confident
Honest
Imaginative (x2)
Influential, lots of social capital
Instinctual
Intense
Iterating between abstract and concrete thinking
Learns through experiences
Likes originality, seeks novelty
Loyal
Motivated by change, open to new experiences
Networks, relates well to others
Observes
Opportunistic mindset, recognizes opportunities
Opportunity focused
Passionate (x2)
Patient
Persistent (x4)
Persuasive
Playful
Pragmatic
Proactive
Prudent
Rapidly recognizes patterns
Resilient
Resourceful
Respects other innovators
Seeks understanding
Self-confident
Socially intelligent
Stamina
Takes initiative
Takes risks
Team-oriented
Thinks big picture
Thrives in uncertainty
Tough
Tweaks solutions constantly
Unattached exploration
Visionary
Wants to get things right
Willing to Destroy

And the sources:

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

People Drive the World-Technology as a Co-Pilot via Center of Human Compassion

Leave a reply

People Drive the World-Technology as a Co-Pilot via Center of Human Compassion

GUEST POST from Teresa Spangler

People at the Center – Technology as a Co-Pilot

Are people at the center of your innovation and new product plans? Have we made people the center of all things digital? Are human’s and our environment the center of the new world entering the 4th Industrial Revolution? When innovation is during groundbreaking disruptive inventions or whether innovation is iterating into new products… what is placed at the center of your strategies? What are the reasons for these new inventions?

So much is at stake, as the world turns to being driven by AI, humanoids, rockets’ red glare searching for new lands to inhabit, games and more games feeding our brains with virtual excitement and stimulation, devices galore on our bodies, in our hands, in our homes helping us navigate our every move and in many ways directing us on how to think. The acceleration of digital permeating our lives is mind boggling. The news we are fed, seemingly unbiased, the product advertisements that sneak into our feeds, the connections via too many social and work-related networks that appear all too promising and friendly too is overwhelming. Technology is encompassing our lives!

The Power of Technology

Don’t get me wrong, I love technology for all the positive it contributes to the world. Technology is allowing individuals to create! To create and earn! To take control of their lives and build meaningful endeavors. The creation of TIME and SPACE to live how we to live has been a major outcome of

1. technology but also 2. the pandemic.

Let’s explore the creator economy which has experienced an explosion of late. As referenced in the Forbes article, The Biggest Trends For 2022 In Creator Economy And Web3, by Maren Thomas Bannon, Today, the total size of the creator economy is estimated to be over $100 billion and 50 million people worldwide consider themselves creators. Creators will continue to bulge out of the global fabric as individuals seek to augment their incomes or escape the confines or rigged corporate cultures. Technology is enabling creators no doubt!

Technology is also allowing forward acting organizations to scale growth at unprecedented speeds. Let’s look at a recent survey conducted by Accenture

Curious about the effects of the pandemic, we completed a second round of research in early 2021 and discovered the following:

Technology Leaders have moved even further ahead of the pack and have been growing at 5x the rate of Laggards on average in the past three years.
Among the “Others” there is a group of organizations—18% of the entire sample—that has been able to break previous performance barriers—the Leapfroggers.

Let’s look at a recent survey conducted by Accenture

Curious about the effects of the pandemic, we completed a second round of research in early 2021 and discovered the following:

Technology Leaders have moved even further ahead of the pack and have been growing at 5x the rate of Laggards on average in the past three years.
Among the “Others” there is a group of organizations—18% of the entire sample—that has been able to break previous performance barriers—the Leapfroggers.

Of course, so much technology is doing good things for the world. 3-D printing is emerging at the center of homelessness. As reported in the #NYTIMES, this tiny village in Mexico is housing homeless people. The homes were built using an oversized 3-D printer.

Another example positive outcomes of technology is the emergence of over-the-counter hearing devices. Fortune Business Insights estimates the global hearing aids market is projected to grow from $6.67 billion in 2021 to $11.02 billion by 2028 at a CAGR of 7.4% in forecast period, 2021-2028.

These devices, until this year, were regulated to being sold by medical professionals at, for the majority of population in need, very high prices $2000 to $5000+ per hearing aid. Yes typically you need two. But recent innovations in ear buds and bluetooth are allowing other technology companies into the game! Take Bose for example, the FDA recently approved Bose SoundControl Hearing Aids to be purchased on their website for $895/pair. No need for a hearing professional. This significantly changes the playing field and opens the doors for so many that have put off purchases (of these not covered by insurance by the way) devices.

Entertainment & leisure travel is going to a whole new level with the help of technology. It’s wonderful that anyone with connectivity and travel the world and explore via Virtual Reality. Here are 52 places you can explore in the comfort of your home shared by NY Times. Many of us attended conferences and events over the past two years virtually. We’ll see an exponential growth in virtual reality experiences in the coming year.

So why am I talking about creating a Center for Human Compassion if so much good is really coming out of technology? Because many of the outcomes are also unrealized and not anticipated or at least publicized to prepare people. It is essential for companies, technologists, and product teams to consider the consequences of new technologies. Not as an afterthought but at the forethought, from inception of ideas we must ask what are the downsides? How will people be affected? What could happen?

The quote below is taken from the World Economic Forum report, Positive AI Economic Futures

machines will be able to do most tasks better than humans. Given these sorts of predictions, it is important to think about the possible consequences of AI for the future of work and to prepare for different scenarios. Continued progress in these technologies could have disruptive effects: from further exacerbating recent trends in inequality to denying more and more people their sense of purpose and fulfillment in life, given that work is much more than just a source of income.

WeForum brings 150 thought leaders together to share thoughts on how we create an AI world we want. For all of AI’s good, there are potentials for negative outcomes.

Let’s take the military’s fight again hobbyists and drones. In the recent article from WSJ, The Military’s New Challenge: Defeating Cheap Hobbyist Drones, how much energy was placed on Human Compassion if drone technologies, IoT and AI got in the wrong hands?

The U.S. is racing to combat an ostensibly modest foe: hobbyist drones that cost a few hundred dollars and can be rigged with explosives. @WSJ

I feel certain there was some consideration but not enough to draw out possible negative impacts and how to mitigate them before they could even start. Did we really put people at the center of what is possible with drone technologies? What do you think?

This is no easy task. We know what is good for us can turn to bad for us when in the wrong hands, or if it’s not moderated to healthy limits. How do we help facilitate a more compassionate relationship with technology and put people at the center?

Here are four strategies to ensure you are keeping people at the center of your innovation, new products and technology development efforts.

Create a Center of Human Compassion, or People Centered Technology Consortium, or what ever you wish to brand your initiative. Select trusted advisors from external (customers, partners…) and a select group of internal stake holders to join your collaborative to gather input, feedback and push back!
Discuss with your trusted group very early on. Gamify initiatives around gathering what ifs! Anticipating the worst you will plan better for the best! (leaving the hope out)
Build a continuous feedback loop. It is important that insights and scenarios are revisited and rehashed over and over again.
Join other consortiums and get involved with AI and tech for good initiatives. If you can’t find ones you feel are of value to you and your company, start one!

Mantra for the year: #lucky2022 but not without work and placing people front and center of plans will good fortune and luck come for the masses.

As always, reach out if you have ideas you’d like to share or questions you’d like to discuss!

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Beyond Automation: How AI Elevates Human Creativity in Innovation

Leave a reply

Beyond Automation: How AI Elevates Human Creativity in Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The chatter surrounding Artificial Intelligence often paints a picture of stark dichotomy: either AI as a tireless automaton, displacing human roles, or as an ominous, sentient entity. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I find both narratives profoundly miss the point. The true revolution of AI isn’t in what it *replaces*, but in what it **amplifies**. Its greatest promise lies not in automation, but in its unparalleled ability to act as a powerful co-pilot, fundamentally elevating human creativity in the complex dance of innovation.

For centuries, the spark of innovation was viewed as a mystical, solitary human endeavor. Yet, in our hyper-connected, data-saturated world, the lone genius model is becoming obsolete. AI steps into this void not as a rival, but as an indispensable cognitive partner, liberating our minds from the tedious and augmenting our uniquely human capacity for empathy, intuition, and truly groundbreaking thought. This isn’t about AI *doing* innovation; it’s about AI empowering humans to innovate with unprecedented depth, speed, and impact.

The Cognitive Co-Pilot: AI as a Creativity Catalyst

To grasp how AI truly elevates human creativity, we must reframe our perspective. Imagine AI not as a separate entity, but as an extension of our own cognitive capabilities, allowing us to think bigger and explore further. AI excels at tasks that often bog down the initial, expansive phases of innovation:

Supercharged Sensing & Synthesis: AI can rapidly sift through petabytes of data—from global market trends and nuanced customer feedback to scientific breakthroughs and competitor strategies. It identifies obscure patterns, correlations, and anomalies that would take human teams decades to uncover, providing a rich, informed foundation for novel ideas.
Expansive Idea Generation: While AI doesn’t possess human “creativity” in the emotional sense, it can generate an astonishing volume of permutations for concepts, designs, or solutions based on defined parameters. This provides innovators with an infinitely diverse raw material, akin to a boundless brainstorming partner, for human refinement and selection.
Rapid Simulation & Prototyping: AI can simulate complex scenarios or render virtual prototypes with incredible speed and accuracy. This accelerates the “test and learn” cycle, allowing innovators to validate assumptions, identify flaws, and iterate ideas at a fraction of the time and cost, minimizing risk before significant investment.
Liberating Drudgery: By automating repetitive, analytical, or research-intensive tasks (e.g., literature reviews, coding boilerplate, data cleaning), AI frees human innovators to dedicate their invaluable time and cognitive energy to higher-order creative thinking, empathic problem framing, and the strategic foresight that only humans can provide.

Meanwhile, the irreplaceable human element brings the very essence of innovation:

Empathy and Nuance: AI can process sentiment, but it cannot truly *feel* or understand the unspoken needs, cultural context, and emotional drivers of human beings. This deep empathy is paramount for defining meaningful problems and designing solutions that truly resonate.
Intuition & Lateral Thinking: The spontaneous “aha!” moments, the ability to connect seemingly disparate concepts in genuinely novel ways, the audacious leap of faith based on gut feeling honed by experience—these remain uniquely human domains.
Ethical Judgment & Purpose: Determining the “why” behind an innovation, its intended impact, and ensuring its alignment with human values and ethical considerations demands human wisdom and foresight.
Storytelling & Vision: Articulating a compelling vision for a new product or solution, inspiring adoption, building coalitions, and weaving a resonant narrative around innovation is a distinctly human art form, essential for bringing ideas to life.

Case Study 1: BenevolentAI – Igniting Scientific Intuition

Accelerating Drug Discovery with AI-Human Collaboration

Traditional drug discovery is a famously protracted, exorbitantly expensive, and often dishearteningly unsuccessful process. BenevolentAI, a pioneering AI-enabled drug discovery company, provides a compelling testament to AI augmenting, rather than replacing, human creativity.

The Challenge: Sifting through billions of chemical compounds and vast scientific literature to identify promising drug candidates and understand their complex interactions with specific diseases.
AI’s Role: BenevolentAI’s platform employs advanced machine learning to digest colossal amounts of biomedical data—from scientific papers and clinical trial results to intricate chemical structures. It uncovers hidden patterns and proposes novel drug targets or molecules that human scientists might otherwise miss or take years to find. This significantly narrows the focus for human investigation.
Human Creativity’s Role: Human scientists, pharmacologists, and biologists then leverage these AI-generated hypotheses. They apply their profound domain expertise, critical thinking, and scientific intuition to design rigorous experiments, interpret complex biological outcomes, and creatively problem-solve the path towards viable drug candidates. The AI provides the expansive landscape of possibilities; the human provides the precision, the ethical lens, and the iterative refinement.

**The Lesson:** AI liberates human scientists from data overwhelm, allowing their creativity to focus on the most intricate scientific challenges and accelerate breakthrough medical solutions.

Case Study 2: Autodesk – Unleashing Design Possibilities

Generative Design: Expanding the Horizon of Sustainable Products

Autodesk, a global leader in 3D design software, has masterfully integrated AI-powered generative design into its offerings. This technology beautifully illustrates how AI can dramatically expand the creative possibilities for engineers and designers, especially in critical fields like sustainable manufacturing.

The Challenge: Designing components that are lighter, stronger, and use minimal material (e.g., for aerospace or automotive sectors) while adhering to stringent engineering and manufacturing constraints.
AI’s Role: Designers input specific performance requirements (e.g., maximum weight, material types, manufacturing processes, stress points). The AI then employs complex algorithms to explore and generate thousands, even millions, of unique design options. These often include highly organic, biomimetic structures that would be beyond conventional human conceptualization, automatically optimizing for factors like material reduction and structural integrity.
Human Creativity’s Role: The human designer remains unequivocally in the driver’s seat. They define the initial problem, establish the critical constraints, and, most importantly, critically evaluate the AI-generated solutions. Their creativity manifests in selecting the optimal design, refining it for aesthetic appeal, integrating it seamlessly into larger systems, and ensuring it meets human-centric criteria like usability, manufacturability, and market appeal in the real world. AI provides the unprecedented breadth of possibilities; the human brings the discerning eye, the artistry, and the practical application.

**The Lesson:** AI provides an explosion of novel design options, freeing human designers to elevate their focus to aesthetic refinement, functional integration, and real-world impact.

Leading the Human-AI Innovation Renaissance

For forward-thinking leaders, the imperative is clear: shift the narrative from “AI will replace us” to “How can AI empower us?” This demands a deliberate cultivation of human-AI collaboration:

Upskill for Synergy: Invest aggressively in training your teams not just in using AI tools, but in the uniquely human skills that enable effective partnership: critical thinking, ethical reasoning, empathetic design, and advanced prompt engineering.
Design for Augmentation: Implement AI systems with the explicit goal of amplifying human capabilities, not merely automating existing tasks. Focus on how AI can enhance insights, accelerate iterations, and free up valuable human cognitive load for higher-value activities.
Foster a Culture of Play and Experimentation: Create safe spaces for teams to explore AI, experiment with its limits, and discover novel ways it can support and spark their creative processes. Encourage a “fail forward fast” mindset with AI.
Anchor in Human Values: Instill a non-negotiable principle that human empathy, ethical considerations, and purpose always remain the guiding stars for every innovation touched by AI. AI is a powerful tool; human values dictate its direction and impact.

The innovation landscape of tomorrow will not be dominated by Artificial Intelligence, nor will it be solely driven by human effort. It will be forged in the most powerful partnership ever conceived: the dynamic fusion of human ingenuity, empathy, and vision with the analytical power and scale of AI. This is not the end of human creativity; it is its most magnificent renaissance, poised to unlock solutions we can barely imagine today.

“The future of work is not human vs. machine, but human + machine.”
– Ginni Rometty

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Balancing Creativity and Feasibility in Innovation

Leave a reply

Balancing Creativity and Feasibility in Innovation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Innovation. The very word pulsates with the promise of progress, often conjuring visions of breakthroughs that reshape industries and improve lives. Yet, beneath the glamour of the “aha!” moment lies a truth often overlooked: a brilliant idea, no matter how disruptive, is merely a whisper in the wind until it can be brought to tangible reality. This is the central paradox, the vital tension, at the heart of truly impactful innovation: the intricate dance between unbridled creativity and grounded feasibility.

Far too often, organizations stumble by overemphasizing one aspect at the expense of the other. Some become playgrounds for “innovation theater,” where whiteboard sessions brim with fantastical concepts, yet none ever see the light of day. These companies generate a flurry of ideas but lack the rigor to assess and execute them. Conversely, others are so risk-averse and steeped in pragmatism that their innovation becomes painfully incremental. They prioritize what’s immediately achievable, effectively stifling any truly transformative thinking and missing the larger opportunities that emerge from challenging the status quo.

“Ideas are easy. Execution is everything.” – John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins

The Indispensable Partnership: Creativity & Feasibility

Imagine creativity as the boundless ocean – vast, deep, and full of unexplored possibilities. It’s the engine of divergent thinking, pushing us to challenge assumptions, question norms, and explore uncharted territories. It asks, “What if? What else could we do? How might we completely reimagine this?”

Feasibility, then, is the experienced navigator and the robust ship. It represents convergent thinking, meticulously evaluating constraints, assessing available resources, and charting a realistic, sustainable course. It asks, “Can we truly build this? Is it sustainable at scale? Do we have the necessary resources and capabilities? What are the inherent risks, and how can we mitigate them?”

The magic happens not when one dominates the other, but when they engage in a continuous, iterative dialogue. An initial creative spark is immediately subjected to a feasibility lens. This check doesn’t kill the idea; rather, it often sparks *new* creative solutions to overcome identified obstacles, refine the concept, or pivot towards an even stronger, viable solution. It’s a cyclical process, a perpetual feedback loop where each refines and strengthens the other.

Case Study 1: Apple’s iPhone – Synthesizing Vision with Viability

Apple’s iPhone – Synthesizing Vision with Viability

When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in 2007, it wasn’t just another mobile phone. It was a audacious creative leap – a seamless convergence of a phone, a widescreen iPod, and a breakthrough internet device, all controlled by a revolutionary multi-touch interface. The vision was to eliminate physical buttons, create an intuitive operating system from scratch, and integrate a vast, extensible application ecosystem.

However, the true genius of Apple wasn’t just in the audacious creative vision; it was in their unparalleled mastery of feasibility. They didn’t just dream big; they possessed the engineering prowess, supply chain expertise, and manufacturing discipline to turn that dream into a polished, mass-market reality. They painstakingly solved immense technical hurdles: perfecting the responsive multi-touch screen, miniaturizing powerful processors, optimizing battery life for constant connectivity, and building a robust, scalable software platform (iOS) that could attract developers. This wasn’t merely invention; it was the meticulous synthesis of creative foresight with an unwavering commitment to practical execution and scalability. Apple understood that for the creative vision to truly disrupt, it had to be undeniably *feasible*.

Case Study 2: Blockbuster vs. Netflix – The Peril of Myopic Feasibility

Blockbuster vs. Netflix – The Peril of Myopic Feasibility

Consider the stark contrast between Blockbuster and Netflix. Blockbuster, once the reigning king of video rentals, was deeply anchored in the feasibility of its existing physical store model. Their enormous physical infrastructure, established supply chains, and predictable revenue from late fees represented a very profitable, tangible business. When a nascent Netflix proposed a mail-order DVD service (a creative new approach), Blockbuster famously dismissed it, seeing it as a niche, unfeasible threat to their dominant brick-and-mortar empire.

Netflix, on the other hand, embraced a creative vision of convenience and accessibility that challenged the norm. They started with a relatively simple, feasible model (DVDs by mail) and continually iterated, demonstrating the feasibility of streaming and eventually content production. Blockbuster’s fatal flaw was allowing the perceived short-term feasibility and profitability of their existing model to blind them to the disruptive creative potential of a new one. Their inability to pivot and invest in a new, feasible model for digital distribution, even when the market signals were clear, led to their eventual demise. Netflix, by continuously balancing its creative vision for entertainment delivery with the evolving feasibility of technology, conquered the market.

Cultivating the Innovation Sweet Spot

So, how can organizations consciously foster this crucial balance? It demands a deliberate, integrated approach:

Embrace Structured Ideation & Rigorous Filtering: Encourage boundless brainstorming sessions, but immediately follow with structured evaluation frameworks that assess both creative potential (novelty, value proposition) and practical viability (technical feasibility, market fit, resource requirements).
Assemble Cross-Functional Catalysts: Break down silos. Bring together diverse perspectives – creative thinkers (designers, strategists), technical experts (engineers, data scientists), and operational pragmatists (finance, supply chain). This diversity ensures ideas are challenged and refined from all angles.
Prototype and Test Relentlessly (Lean & Agile): Don’t strive for perfection upfront. Build Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) and prototypes quickly to test core assumptions about both user desirability (creative validation) and technical/business feasibility. Iterate rapidly based on real-world feedback, making feasibility an ongoing learning process, not a final gate.
Develop Clear Innovation Pathways: Establish transparent stages in your innovation funnel where ideas are not just generated but rigorously evaluated and refined against both creative aspiration and practical viability criteria. This ensures a healthy pipeline of both breakthrough and incremental innovations.
Cultivate a Culture of Psychological Safety: People must feel empowered to propose radical ideas without fear of immediate dismissal, and equally safe to voice genuine concerns about feasibility without being labeled as negative or unsupportive. Open, honest dialogue is paramount.

Ultimately, true innovation isn’t about conjuring magic; it’s about disciplined imagination. It’s understanding that the most brilliant ideas are only half the battle. The other, often more challenging half, is the art and science of transforming that brilliance into tangible value for customers and the organization. By consciously nurturing the dynamic interplay between creativity and feasibility, organizations can transcend mere ideation and consistently deliver impactful innovation that truly reshapes the future.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Battle Against the Half-Life of Learning

Leave a reply

The Battle Against the Half-Life of Learning

GUEST POST from Douglas Ferguson

Leading with learning in mind is a necessary skill to consistently innovate as a team. Continually learning and revisiting skill sets is crucial to combating the half-life of learning.

As leaders, it’s important to make time available to our employees to freshen up their skills and knowledge through programs and tools. It’s equally important to ask ourselves, “how am I helping to provide the right resources?”.

Below, we’ll discuss the following:

What is the half-life of learning?
How can we contribute as leaders?
Why should individual growth be the focus?

What is the half-life of learning?

Now, what is the half-life of learning? For one, it’s something that is not talked about frequently enough. It affects all of us, no matter what we specialize in and touch day-to-day. It lives within marketing campaigns, our bodies, the living things around us, our skill sets, and more.

Put succinctly, it’s the halfway point of one’s strength becoming ineffective. Regarding learning or knowledge, the half-life is the halfway point for a current skill set or facts to no longer be true or effective.

Ernest Rutherford discovered the concept of a half-life within the context of science. He deduced that it takes a certain period of time for an element to decay halfway.

For example, we can ask, “what’s the half-life of caffeine in a group of 100 people?“ Caffeine’s half-life is about five fours. By the fifth hour, the caffeine’s effects have fully diminished within half (50/100) of the people. Within the half-life period of the next five hours, the effects expire on half of the remaining 50 people (25/100), and so on. Like any other element, its effects vary per person, but the half-life serves as a comprehensible range for its lifespan.

We can also practically apply this to work. Within marketing, how long can a campaign represent relevant and effective information? Within learning, how long are someone’s learned skills still relevant?

Say that you’ve been operating with skills you learned years ago. Since then, your competitive advantage with those learned skills has diminished. The World Economic Forum claims that “the half-life of a job skill is about five years (meaning that every five years, that skill is about half as valuable as it was before).”

How can we contribute as leaders?

Suppose you consciously support your employees in real learning, educating themselves, participating in important programs within their specialty, etc… In that case, they remain relevant in their field and are significantly more valuable in their role. It’s a no-brainer when spelled out. As leaders, we need to make this a priority and hold ourselves and others accountable for staying ahead rather than playing catch-up.

We lose information without practice and reinforcement. Putting this concept into practice is critical to working against the half-life of learning.

How are we approaching accountability in this realm? These organizations offer structuring opportunities for learning and upkeep accountability. At Voltage Control, we have programs designed to keep organizations on track and sustain change.

Maintaining a competitive advantage requires this continual learning. An environment for innovation can only be cultivated by staying ahead of the curve with knowledge and skills.

What are the best resources for knowledge? Knowledge can be taught with content. Find the relevant educational content, and commit to time with it regularly. Are there education programs that employees can attend? Who in the space is in the business of educating others? We should be absorbing information that’s new to us.

It’s also key to observe trends within certain fields. What is changing within their expertise in the next ten years, and is knowledge or experience required?

What are the best resources for skills? They’ve learned through experience with others. The more we can encourage collaboration amongst individuals, the better our team. We develop skills by learning from those with more or different experiences, so it’s important to have confidence in your team’s structure and provide room for growth within the company, as well as to educate individuals about the half-life of learning so that they’re invested in their growth.

Setting aside time specifically for continuing education in both knowledge and skills is vital.

Where are we headed?

As innovators, not only do we need to be ready to address change. We need to expect it and get well ahead of it.

Within the workplace, demand does not match supply long-term. In 2020, the World Economic Forum claimed, “This lack of attention to upscaling will lead to an urgent disparity between workers and jobs. In the future, nine out of 10 jobs will require digital skills, yet today 44% of Europeans age 16 to 43 lack even basic digital abilities. In Europe, the impending skills gap will lead to 1.67 million unfilled vacancies for ICT professionals by 2025.”

The world around us is constantly evolving.

The half-life of learning is something to be embraced. It’s an opportunity to recognize that everyone’s skills fade and that innovation will always play a role in our lives. It’s a matter of whether we choose to continue learning or accept our past experience as the extent of it. Learning and management play equal roles in the workplace. To impact our work, leaders need to allow employees the time and resources to develop and learn information relevant to business goals.

Why should individual growth be the focus?

Keeping this half-life of learning in mind is crucial from a hiring perspective. Degrees from decades ago have little to nothing to do with the knowledge that’s relevant now. Thinking long-term, it’s also important to consider how roles need to evolve with time. Automation is likely to greatly impact needed skill sets in the current decade. For example, McKinsey claims, “6 of 10 current occupations have more than 30% of technically automatable activities.” They claim that while job opportunities will still exist, a significant portion of the population will need to learn new skill sets to remain relevant.

People need to feel that there’s room for groove within their rules and that their responsibilities can develop as they do. How are we allowing employees to explore their interests and strengths? Are we using them to our advantage within the organization? Are we allowing them the flexibility to understand their strengths and value?

Article originally published on VoltageControl.com

Image Credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Overcoming Creative Blocks in Problem Solving

Leave a reply

Overcoming Creative Blocks in Problem Solving

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Creative blocks are a common hurdle in the process of problem-solving. Whether you’re an individual seeking solutions or a company aiming for innovation, breaking through these barriers is crucial. Here, we’ll explore strategies to overcome creative blocks and illustrate them with real-world examples.

Understanding Creative Blocks

At its core, a creative block is a mental barrier that impedes the flow of ideas and solutions. These blocks can stem from various sources, such as fear of failure, excessive self-criticism, or lack of inspiration. Acknowledging that these challenges exist is the first step to overcoming them.

Strategies to Overcome Creative Blocks

Here are essential strategies to navigate through creative barriers:

Change of Environment: Sometimes, a fresh perspective can be gained by simply stepping away from your usual surroundings.
Mindfulness and Reflection: Practices like meditation can help calm the mind and clear cognitive clutter.
Collaborative Brainstorming: Engaging with others can introduce new ideas and foster innovative thinking.
Embrace Constraints: Constraints can actually enhance creativity by forcing unique solutions.

Case Study 1: IDEO’s Human-Centered Design Approach

IDEO, a global design company, is renowned for its human-centered design process. When faced with creative blocks, IDEO leverages empathy to drive innovation. By deeply understanding the needs of the people they design for, IDEO can approach problems from the user’s perspective, unlocking new opportunities for creativity.

For instance, IDEO worked with a healthcare provider to redesign the patient experience. By conducting extensive field research and interviews, they identified pain points and developed solutions that were not only innovative but also catered directly to patient needs. This empathy-driven approach helped to dissolve creative blocks and generated actionable insights.

Case Study 2: Google’s 20% Time Policy

Google’s famous “20% time” policy allows employees to dedicate a portion of their time to projects they are passionate about, irrespective of their official job responsibilities. This freedom has led to the development of significant products like Gmail and Google News.

The opportunity to explore personal interests without the pressure of immediate results encourages experimentation and can help employees overcome creative stagnation. This illustrates the power of autonomy in enhancing creativity and problem-solving capabilities.

Reflection and Adaptation

Reflecting on past experiences and adapting strategies accordingly ensures continuous growth in creative problem solving. It is essential to remain flexible and open to change. The dynamic nature of creativity requires a mindset that is as adaptable as it is innovative.

Expanded Insights and Application

Let’s delve deeper into enhancing creativity across different contexts:

Encouraging Play and Exploration

Introducing elements of play can lead to unexpected breakthroughs. Play encourages risk-taking and diminishes fear of failure, fostering an environment where creativity thrives. Companies can introduce playful workshops or gamified brainstorming sessions to inspire creative thinking.

Nurturing a Diverse Mindset

Diversity goes beyond ethnicity or gender; it encompasses differing experiences, perspectives, and industries. Including diverse voices in brainstorming sessions ensures a wealth of ideas and can challenge conventional thinking patterns, leading to innovative solutions.

Feedback and Iteration

Consistent feedback loops and iterative processes play a crucial role in refining ideas. By embracing a culture of experimentation and viewing feedback as a development tool rather than criticism, organizations can foster a continuous cycle of improvement and ideation.

The Path Ahead: Building a Creative Culture

Creating an environment that values curiosity, embraces failure as learning, and supports diverse perspectives will help organizations and individuals navigate and overcome creative blocks effectively. Leaders must champion these values and provide the resources and frameworks necessary to support innovation at all levels.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Why Stupid Questions Are Important to Innovation

Leave a reply

Why Stupid Questions Are Important to Innovation

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

16 year-old girl Gracie Cunningham created a firestorm recently when she posted a video to TikTok asking “is math real?” More specifically, she wanted to know why ancient mathematicians came up with algebraic concepts such as “y=mx+b.” “What would you need it for?” she asked, when they didn’t even have plumbing.

The video went viral on twitter, gathering millions of views and the social media universe immediately pounced, with many ridiculing how stupid it was. Mathematicians and scientists, however, felt otherwise and remarked how profound her questions were. Cornell’s Steve Strogatz even sent her a thoughtful answer to her question.

We often overlook the value of simple questions, because we think intelligence has something to do with ability to recite rote facts. Yet intellect is not about knowing all the answers, but in asking better questions. That’s how we expand knowledge and gain deeper understanding. In fact, the most profound answers often come from seemingly silly questions.

What Would It Be Like to Ride on a Bolt of Lightning?

Over a century ago, a teenage boy not unlike Gracie Cunningham asked a question that was seemingly just as silly as hers. He wanted to know what it would be like to ride on a bolt of lightning shining a lantern forward. Yet much like Gracie’s, his question belied a deceptive profundity. You see, a generation earlier, the great physicist James Clerk Maxwell published his famous equations which established that the speed of light was constant.

To understand why the question was so important, think about riding on a train that’s traveling at 40 miles an hour and tossing a ball forward at 40 miles an hour. To you, the ball appears to be traveling at 40 miles an hour, but to someone standing still outside the train the ball would appear to be going 80 miles an hour (40+40).

So now you can see the problem with riding on a bolt of lightning with a lantern. According to the principle by which the ball on the train appears to be traveling at 80 miles an hour, the light from the lantern should be traveling at twice the speed of light. But according to Maxwell’s equations, the speed of light is fixed.

It took Albert Einstein 10 years to work it all out, but in 1905, he published his theory of special relativity, which stated that, while the speed of light is indeed constant, time and space are relative. As crazy as that sounds, you only need to take a drive in your car to prove it’s true. GPS satellites are calibrated according to Einstein’s equations, so if you get to where you want to go you have, in a certain sense, proved the special theory of relativity.

A bit later Einstein asked another seemingly silly question about what it would be like to travel in an elevator in space, which led him to his general theory of relativity.

Who Shaves the Barber’s Beard?

Around the time young Albert Einstein was thinking about riding on a bolt of lightning, others were pondering an obscure paradox about a barber, which went something like this:

If the barber shaves every man who does not shave himself, who shaves the barber?

If he shaves himself, he violates the statement and if he doesn’t shave himself, he also violates the statement.

Again, like Gracie’s question, the barber’s paradox seems a bit silly and childish. In reality it is a more colloquial version of Russell’s paradox about sets that are members of themselves, which shook the foundations of mathematics a century ago. Statements, such as 2+2=4, are supposed to be either true or false. If contradictions could exist, it would represent a massive hole at the center of logic.

Eventually, the crisis came to a head and David Hilbert, the greatest mathematician of the age, created a program of questions that, if answered in the affirmative, would resolve the dilemma. To everyone’s surprise, in short order, a young scholar named Kurt Gödel would publish his incompleteness theorems, which showed that a logical system could be either complete or consistent, but not both.

Put more simply, Gödel proved that every logical system would always crash. It was only a matter of time. Logic would remain broken forever. However, there was a silver lining to it all. A few years later, Alan Turing would build on Gödel’s work in his paper on computability, which itself would usher in the new era of modern computing.

Why Can’t Our Immune System Kill Cancer Cells?

The idea that our immune system could attack cancer cells doesn’t seem that silly on the surface. After all, it not only regularly kills other pathogens, such as bacteria, viruses and, in some cases, such as with autoimmune disorders like multiple sclerosis, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, even attacks our own cells. Why would it ignore tumors?

Yet as Charles Graeber explains in his recent book, The Breakthrough, for decades most of the medical world dismissed the notion. Yes, there had been a few scattered cases in which cancer patients who had a severe infection had seen their tumors disappear, but every time they tried to design an actual cancer therapy based on immune response it failed miserably.

The mystery was eventually solved by a scientist named Jim Allison who, in 1995, had an epiphany. Maybe, he thought, that the problem wasn’t that our immune system can’t identify and attack cancer cells, but rather that the immune response is impeded somehow. He figured if he could block that process, it would revolutionize cancer care.

Today, cancer immunotherapy is considered to be the 4th pillar of cancer treatment and nobody questions whether our immune system can be deployed to fight cancer. Jim Allison won the Nobel Prize for his work in 2018.

The Power of a Question

Answers are easy. They resolve matters. Questions are harder. They point out gaps in our knowledge and inadequacies in our understanding. They make us uncomfortable. That’s why we are so apt to dismiss them altogether. So we can go about our business unhindered.

So it shouldn’t be surprising that young Gracie Cunningham’s TikTok garnered such strong reactions. It’s much easier to dismiss questions as silly than to take them on. That’s why Einstein was reduced to working in a patent office rather than at a university, why so many dismissed Russell’s paradox as meaningless and why Jim Allison had doors shut in his face for three years before he found a company willing to invest in his idea.

Yet what should also be obvious by now is that there is enormous value in raising questions that challenge things that we think we already know. Before questions were raised, it seemed obvious that time and space are absolute, that logical statements are either true or false and that our immune system can’t fight cancer.

The truth is that great innovators are not necessarily smarter, harder working or more ambitious than anyone else, but rather those who are constantly looking for new questions to ask and new problems to solve.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

AI-Powered Tools for Creative Industries

Leave a reply

AI-Powered Tools for Creative Industries

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

The creative industries are experiencing a transformation, thanks to artificial intelligence (AI) tools that enhance productivity, spark innovation, and expand creative possibilities. From content creation to design, AI-powered tools are reshaping the way artists, designers, and thinkers work. This article explores these advancements, featuring real-world case studies that illustrate the impact of AI on creative processes.

The Rise of AI in Creative Processes

AI is equipped to handle tasks that traditionally required significant human effort, such as pattern recognition and data analysis. However, its influence on creativity isn’t about replacing human artistry—it’s about augmenting it. AI can handle repetitive tasks, allowing creatives to focus on what they do best: innovating and ideating.

Case Study 1: AI in Music Composition

AI Platform: AIVA (Artificial Intelligence Virtual Artist)

AIVA is an AI-based composer that’s been used by artists and musicians around the world to enhance and inspire music production. Trained on a wide range of classical compositions, AIVA can create original scores and suggest enhancements to existing compositions. By iterating with composers, AIVA helps create music that resonates emotionally with audiences.

Outcome: AIVA was employed in film scoring, leading to a fusion of human creativity and AI precision. Composers reported a 30% reduction in time spent on initial drafts, allowing more time to focus on intricacy and expression.

Tools Transforming the Industry

Beyond music, AI tools are influencing numerous sectors within creative industries. They provide everything from generative design and content curation to audience engagement analytics. Let’s explore another example where AI tools have significantly impacted creativity.

Case Study 2: AI in Graphic Design

AI Platform: Adobe Sensei

Adobe Sensei uses AI to boost productivity and creativity for graphic designers by automating mundane tasks such as object detection and layering. Designers can create more complex visuals in less time with AI assistance. Tools like Adobe’s “Content-Aware Fill” leverage AI algorithms to enhance or alter images seamlessly.

Outcome: A marketing agency integrated Adobe Sensei into their workflow, reducing their design time for digital advertising campaigns by 40%. Designers reported feeling less creatively fatigued, leading to a rise in innovative concepts and overall client satisfaction.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence has carved out an invaluable role within the creative industries, not as a replacement, but as a powerful ally. The potential for AI to enhance creative output lies in its ability to handle intensive tasks, providing creatives with the freedom to push boundaries. As AI continues to evolve, so too will the possibilities for innovation, ensuring that the marriage between human creativity and machine precision leads to exciting new frontiers.

Image credit: Microsoft CoPilot

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Tools and Techniques for Measuring Creativity

Leave a reply

Tools and Techniques for Measuring Creativity

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Creativity is often considered the lifeblood of innovation. Yet, measuring creativity can be a daunting task. How do we quantify the unquantifiable? In this article, we will explore some robust tools and techniques designed to measure creativity within individuals and organizations. We’ll delve into two case studies that highlight successful applications of these methods.

Why Measure Creativity?

Before diving into the tools and techniques, it’s crucial to understand why measuring creativity is important. Organizations that can effectively identify and foster creative potential are better positioned to innovate and adapt in a rapidly changing world. Measuring creativity helps in setting benchmarks, identifying creative talents, and aligning them with business goals.

Tools and Techniques

There are several methods to measure creativity, ranging from psychometric tests to real-world observation and evaluation. Here are some of the most widely used:

The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)

The TTCT is one of the most broadly used creativity assessments. It evaluates divergent thinking and problem-solving skills across several dimensions, such as fluency, originality, and elaboration. Though primarily used in educational settings, many organizations leverage TTCT to gauge individual creativity.

Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT)

This technique involves expert judges evaluating the creativity of outputs within a certain domain. The idea is that experts in a given field are best positioned to assess the creativity of work produced in that area. CAT is particularly useful for organizations focused on specific industries like art, literature, or design.

Creative Climate Assessments

These assessments focus on measuring the organizational environment to evaluate how conducive it is to creative thinking. Tools like the KEYS Assessment evaluate workplace climate factors such as challenge, freedom, and support for ideas, which are crucial for fostering creativity.

Case Study 1: TechCorp’s Use of TTCT

TechCorp, a leading software company, implemented the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking to identify high-potential employees for their innovation lab. By focusing on fluency and originality scores, TechCorp was able to select a diverse group of individuals whose creative problem-solving abilities helped drive several successful projects. This method allowed them to form cross-functional teams with a strong balance of analytical and creative skills.

Case Study 2: Creative Marketing Solutions with CAT

Creative Marketing Solutions (CMS) specializes in advertising and creative campaigns. They implemented the Consensual Assessment Technique to evaluate the creativity of pitches. By utilizing panels of industry experts, CMS was able to refine their creative approach and enhance client satisfaction. This led to more innovative campaigns and a significant increase in client retention rates.

Conclusion

While creativity remains a complex trait to measure, the right tools and techniques can provide insights into an organization’s creative potential. Whether through traditional psychometric assessments like the TTCT or through nuanced evaluations such as the CAT, understanding and measuring creativity is key to fostering an innovative culture. Case studies like those from TechCorp and CMS reveal the transformative power of leveraging these methodologies. Embrace the challenge of measuring creativity, and your organization can unlock untapped innovative potential!

Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Can You Ever Be a Truly Independent Thinker?

Leave a reply

Can You Ever Be a Truly Independent Thinker?

GUEST POST from Tom Stafford, University of Sheffield

‘It’s important to me that I make my own decisions, but I often wonder how much they are actually influenced by cultural and societal norms, by advertising, the media and those around me. We all feel the need to fit in, but does this prevent us from making decisions for ourselves? In short, can I ever be a truly free thinker?’ Richard, Yorkshire.

There’s good news and bad news on this one. In his poem Invictus, William Ernest Henley wrote: “It matters not how strait the gate, How charged with punishments the scroll, I am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul.”

While being the lone “captain of your soul” is a reassuring idea, the truth is rather more nuanced. The reality is that we are social beings driven by a profound need to fit in – and as a consequence, we are all hugely influenced by cultural norms.

But to get to the specifics of your question, advertising, at least, may not influence you as much as you imagine. Both advertisers and the critics of advertising like us to think that ads can make us dance any way they want, especially now everything is digital and personalised ad targeting is possible in a way it never was before.

This article is part of Life’s Big Questions

The Conversation’s new series, co-published with BBC Future, seeks to answer our readers’ nagging questions about life, love, death and the universe. We work with professional researchers who have dedicated their lives to uncovering new perspectives on the questions that shape our lives.

In reality, there is no precise science of advertising. Most new products fail, despite the advertising they receive. And even when sales go up, nobody is exactly sure of the role advertising played. As the marketing pioneer John Wanamaker said:

Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don’t know which half.

You’d expect advertisers to exaggerate the effectiveness of advertising, and scholars of advertising have typically made more modest claims. Even these, though, may be overestimates. Recent studies have claimed that both online and offline, the methods commonly used to study advertising effectiveness vastly exaggerate the power of advertising to change our beliefs and behaviour.

This has led some to claim that not just half, but perhaps nearly all advertising money is wasted, at least online.

There are similar results outside of commerce. One review of field experiments in political campaigning argued “the best estimate of the effects of campaign contact and advertising on Americans’ candidates choices in general elections is zero”. Zero!

In other words, although we like to blame the media for how people vote, it is surprisingly hard to find solid evidence of when and how people are swayed by the media. One professor of political science, Kenneth Newton, went so far as to claim “It’s Not the Media, Stupid”.

But although advertising is a weak force, and although hard evidence on how the media influences specific choices is elusive, every one of us is undoubtedly influenced by the culture in which we live.

Followers of fashion

Fashions exist both for superficial things, such as buying clothes and opting for a particular hairstyle, but also for more profound behaviour like murder and even suicide. Indeed, we all borrow so much from those we grow up around, and those around us now, that it seems impossible to put a clear line between our individual selves and the selves society forges for us.

Two examples: I don’t have any facial tattoos, and I don’t want any. If I wanted a facial tattoo my family would think I’d gone mad. But if I was born in some cultures, where these tattoos were common and conveyed high status, such as traditional Māori culture, people would think I was unusual if I didn’t want facial tattoos.

Similarly, if I had been born a Viking, I can assume that my highest ambition would have been to die in battle, axe or sword in hand. In their belief system, after all, that was surest way to Valhalla and a glorious afterlife. Instead, I am a liberal academic whose highest ambition is to die peacefully in bed, a long way away from any bloodshed. Promises of Valhalla have no influence over me.

Vikings had different beliefs to most modern liberal academics.
Shutterstock

Ultimately, I’d argue that all of our desires are patterned by the culture we happen to be born in.

But it gets worse. Even if we could somehow free ourselves from cultural expectations, other forces impinge on our thoughts. Your genes can affect your personality and so they must also, indirectly, have a knock-on effect on your beliefs.

Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, famously talked about the influence of parents and upbringing on behaviour, and he probably wasn’t 100% wrong. Even just psychologically, how can you ever think freely, separate from the twin influences of prior experience and other people?

From this perspective, all of our behaviours and our desires are profoundly influenced by outside forces. But does this mean they aren’t also our own?

The answer to this dilemma, I think, is not to free yourself from outside influences. This is impossible. Instead, you should see yourself and your ideas as the intersection of all the forces that come to play on you.

Some of these are shared – like our culture – and some are unique to you – your unique experience, your unique history and biology. Being a free thinker, from this perspective, means working out exactly what makes sense to you, from where you are now.

You can’t – and shouldn’t – ignore outside influences, but the good news is that these influences are not some kind of overwhelming force. All the evidence is compatible with the view that each of us, choice by choice, belief by belief, can make reasonable decisions for ourselves, not unshackled from the influences of others and the past, but free to chart our own unique paths forward into the future.

After all, the captain of a ship doesn’t sail while ignoring the wind – sometimes they go with it, sometimes against it, but they always account for it. Similarly, we think and make our choices in the context of all our circumstances, not by ignoring them.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Image Credits: Pixabay, Shutterstock (via theconversation)

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.