The Phoenix Checklist – Strategies for Innovation and Regeneration

Leave a reply

The Phoenix Checklist - Strategies for Innovation and Regeneration

GUEST POST from Teresa Spangler

“The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought.”   Sun Tzu

As reference I love using Michael Michalko book, Thinkertoys. It’s been on my shelf since first released in the 1991, especially in the most challenging times. This book has gotten me and my businesses through 2 gulf wars, 9/11/01 economic aftermath, 2008/9 deep recession and even good times where innovation felt no need.

In chapter 14, Phoenix, he shares the CIA’s checklist for dissecting and solving critical problems. BUT don’t just use this for tackling a problem, use it to help you design new business models, new revenue models, innovating a new product… the checklist applies to scenario planning and breaking down opportunities into manageable strategies to execute new ideas, processes and products.

It’s a strategy used and touted by experts over and over again and it works: The Phoenix Checklist Strategy. Challenging your own assumptions every minute of the day is not a bad thing right now. Putting a framework around how best to challenge your team and build stronger more reliable assumptions and plans is a great idea. I am sure there are strategies already at play and that too is a great thing. What more could be done today that you are not already doing? Maybe this is a great basis for the first question you want to answer using the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) trusted Phoenix checklist.

Below is the Phoenix Checklist but broken down in the way we at Plazabridge Group use the tool for innovating new ideas and solving critical issues for our clients.

>Start here: Can you imagine the result if you solve the problem?

Illusion licensed from iStock by PlazaBridge GroupGet those creative juices flowing.

What do you see?

What’s the first thing you see?

What’s the 2nd thing you see?

I. Define the problem– The first stage is to tackle the checklist.

Below are the Typical questions we ask and may have answers for… but go deeper!

  • Why is it necessary to solve the problem?
  • What benefits do you get by solving the problem?
  • What are the unknown factors?
  • Have you encountered this problem before?
  • What data do we have to help us dissect the problem down into smaller pieces?

We often fail to go deeper into defining the challenges to be solved or opportunities to create Go deeper questions:

  • What are you not yet understanding?
  • What information do you have?
  • What is not the problem?
  • Is the information you have sufficient? Insufficient? Superfluous? Contradictory?
  • Can you describe the problem in a chart?
  • Where is the limit for the problem?
  • Can you distinguish the different parts of the problem? Can you write them down? What are the relationships between the different parts of the problem? What is common to the different problem areas?

Then go even deeper exploration:

  • Have you seen this problem in a slightly different form? Do you know a related issue?
  • Try to think of a familiar problem with the same or similar unknown factors.
  • Suppose you find a problem similar to yours that has already been resolved. Can you use it? Can you use the same method?
  • Can you reformulate your problem? How many different ways can you reformulate it? More generally? More specifically? Can the rules change?
  • What are the best, worst and most likely outcomes you can imagine?

Designing the plan checklist:

Our team starts here cutting through most challenges or designing new opportunities we want to tackle.

What will solving this problem do for our company? Answer this question daily for two weeks. See what happens. It’s magical really!   Define, Write, chart, and visualize every step of the way. Assign roles to each member of the team to tackle component outcomes of the exploration.

  • How will you solve the whole problem? Can you break the problem down?
  • How much of the unknown can you influence?
  • Can you deduce something useful from the information you have?
  • Have you used all available information?
  • Have you taken into account all the essential factors in the problem?
  • Can you identify the steps in the problem-solving process? Can you determine the accuracy of each step?
    • Draw these out –
    • Then redraw them
    • And again
  • What creative techniques can you use to generate ideas? How many different techniques?
    • After exploring creative techniques go back to the previous bullet point and draw out the steps again.
    • Then again
    • And yes ONE MORE MAGICAL time

Imagine again the results in the perfect world! What would the results be, look like, feel to everyone in the company, to you and to your customers?

  • Can you imagine the result? How many different types of results can imagine?
  • How many different ways can you try to solve the problem?
  • What have others done?
  • Can you intuitively see the solution? Can you check the result?
  • What should be done? How should it be done?
  • Where, when and by whom should it be done?
  • What do you need to do right now?
  • Who will be responsible for what?

Now what? Can you do more with the plan?

  • Can you use this problem to resolve any other issues?
  • What are the unique qualities that make this problem what it is and nothing else?
  • Which milestones can best highlight your progress?
  • How do you know when you are successful?

This last point is so very important and often left out of processes. There are stages of success. Success doesn’t happen all at once so how will you create your timeline to give any new plan a chance to succeed? Better yet, how will you know if you are not succeeding? The plan was well thought out, a lot of time was invested and possibly a lot of money! Don’t give up but in your scenario planning do know what you are watching for to say, how and where shall we adjust along the way and constantly question how to improve the plan. Give it long enough, give it a fighting chance, put your top minds in the company on these challenges and opportunities.

Create your opportunity team of diverse thinkers! They are your innovators.

Create your action team! They are your executors!

Now you are ready for the next challenge or opportunity. Start at the top and repeat.

Original Article

Image credits: iStockPhoto (purchased by the author)

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Creating Accessible Digital Experiences

Leave a reply

Creating Accessible Digital Experiences

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the relentless pursuit of innovation, organizations often focus on speed, features, and market share. Yet, a fundamental aspect, one that unlocks true human potential and broadens market reach, is frequently overlooked: **accessibility**. For too long, accessibility has been relegated to a compliance checkbox, a burdensome requirement rather than a strategic advantage. I’m here to tell you that creating accessible digital experiences isn’t just about meeting mandates; it’s a profound strategic imperative, a catalyst for deeper customer engagement, enhanced brand loyalty, and genuine social impact. It’s about designing for humanity, not just for the “average” user, and in doing so, unlocking new avenues for growth and competitive differentiation.

The digital world, for all its promise of connectivity and information, can paradoxically create formidable barriers. For individuals with disabilities – visual, auditory, motor, cognitive – an inaccessible website, app, or software platform can be a fortress, not a gateway. When we design with accessibility in mind from the outset, we aren’t just accommodating a minority; we are improving the experience for everyone. Think about the universal design principles seen in the physical world: curb cuts, originally designed for wheelchairs, now benefiting parents with strollers, delivery drivers, and even skateboarders. The same principle applies in the digital realm, yielding universal benefits that improve usability and engagement for all.

The Irrefutable Business Case for Accessibility

Beyond the undeniable ethical responsibility, there’s an increasingly compelling business case for prioritizing accessibility. Leaders who grasp this are positioning their organizations for future success:

  • Expanded Market Reach: According to the World Health Organization, over one billion people, about 15% of the global population, experience some form of disability. This represents a significant, often underserved, market segment with substantial purchasing power – a market you’re currently missing if your experiences aren’t accessible.
  • Enhanced Usability for All: Features like clear navigation, high-contrast text, keyboard operability, and intuitive interfaces don’t just help those with disabilities; they enhance the experience for everyone. Consider a user accessing your app on a small screen in bright sunlight (requiring higher contrast) or a busy professional multitasking (benefiting from clear auditory cues and keyboard shortcuts).
  • Improved SEO & Performance: Many accessibility best practices, such as semantic HTML, proper heading structures, descriptive alt text for images, and well-structured content, directly contribute to better search engine optimization (SEO) and overall site performance. Google rewards well-structured, user-friendly content.
  • Reduced Legal Risk: Non-compliance with accessibility standards (like WCAG – Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, which are increasingly adopted globally) can lead to costly lawsuits, significant fines, and severe reputational damage. Proactive implementation is the most effective risk mitigation strategy.
  • Innovation & Brand Reputation: Companies that champion accessibility are seen as innovative, forward-thinking, and genuinely inclusive. This builds powerful brand loyalty, attracts top talent who value ethical practices, and fosters a culture of true innovation by pushing teams to think more creatively about problem-solving.

The Transformative Shift: From Compliance to Culture

The true breakthrough happens when accessibility transitions from a reactive checklist item mandated by legal teams to an ingrained, proactive part of an organization’s design, development, and content creation culture. This requires a human-centered approach, profound empathy, and a commitment to continuous learning and adaptation.

  1. Embrace Inclusive Design Principles: Design for diversity from day one. Actively involve people with disabilities in the user research, design, and testing processes. Their lived experiences provide invaluable insights that no able-bodied designer can replicate.
  2. Educate and Empower Teams: Provide comprehensive, ongoing training for designers, developers, product managers, quality assurance specialists, and content creators on accessibility standards (WCAG), assistive technologies, and inclusive design methodologies. Foster a shared understanding and collective responsibility.
  3. Integrate Accessibility into Workflows: Make accessibility a standard, non-negotiable requirement in every sprint, every design review, every code commit, and every quality assurance check. It’s not an add-on or a post-launch fix; it’s integral to the definition of “done.”
  4. Utilize Robust Tools & Testing: Leverage automated accessibility checkers for initial scans, but always complement this with manual testing using a variety of assistive technologies (e.g., popular screen readers like JAWS or NVDA, voice control software, keyboard-only navigation). Critically, conduct usability testing with actual users with diverse abilities.
  5. Iterate and Improve Continuously: Accessibility is an ongoing journey, not a static destination. Establish feedback loops, monitor digital experience performance against accessibility metrics, and continuously iterate to enhance the user experience based on real-world usage and evolving standards.

Pioneering Inclusivity: Case Studies in Action

Case Study 1: Microsoft’s Cultural Transformation for Accessibility

Microsoft has undergone a remarkable journey, transforming accessibility from a secondary consideration to a core tenet of its mission: “to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more.” This wasn’t merely about adding features; it was a profound cultural shift. They launched initiatives like the “AI for Accessibility” program, a $25 million five-year grant program leveraging AI to amplify human capabilities for people with disabilities, fostering external innovation. Internally, they’ve deeply integrated accessibility features into Windows, Office 365, and Xbox, from advanced Narrator screen reader improvements to live captions for Teams meetings and the groundbreaking Xbox Adaptive Controller, designed for gamers with limited mobility. This deep commitment extends to their hiring practices, ensuring diverse perspectives are inherent in product development teams, leading to more thoughtful, empathetic, and ultimately, more universally effective solutions.

Case Study 2: Starbucks’ Seamless Inclusive Digital Ordering

Starbucks, a global leader celebrated for its in-store customer experience, recognized the escalating importance of equally accessible digital channels. Their highly utilized mobile app, a primary touchpoint for millions of daily orders, became a focal point for significant accessibility enhancements. Collaborating closely with accessibility experts and, critically, with blind and low-vision users, they embarked on a comprehensive overhaul. This included vastly improving screen reader compatibility, optimizing color contrast ratios, and streamlining the entire navigation flow. The goal was to ensure users relying on assistive technologies could seamlessly browse menus, customize complex orders, apply loyalty points, and complete payments – functionalities absolutely crucial to the personalized Starbucks experience. This strategic investment not only significantly broadened their customer base, tapping into a previously underserved demographic, but also powerfully reinforced their brand image as a progressive, community-focused organization. The holistic improvements ultimately benefited all users by making the app inherently more intuitive, robust, and reliable, underscoring the universal dividends of inclusive design.

The Future is Undeniably Inclusive

As we race towards a future increasingly dominated by sophisticated digital interactions – from augmented reality to hyper-personalized AI and the metaverse – the imperative for accessibility only grows stronger. My perspective on human-centered innovation demands that we place empathy, usability, and inclusivity at the very core of our digital creation process. True innovation isn’t just about what technology can do; it’s about what it enables people to do, regardless of their diverse abilities. By embracing accessibility as a profound strategic advantage and embedding it as a cultural cornerstone, organizations can build not just better products and services, but fundamentally a better, more equitable, and more prosperous digital world for all.

The time for lip service is over. The time to act decisively is now. Let’s design a future where every digital door is truly open to everyone, creating value not just for shareholders, but for humanity.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Four Secrets of Innovation Implementation

1 Reply

The Four Secrets of Innovation Implementation

GUEST POST from Shilpi Kumar

In today’s context, innovation is a different beast altogether! To stay in the competition, organizations must innovate continuously, which means moving robust ideas through the innovation pipeline faster and more effectively while never losing sight of the context and needs of the customer.

Over the last 15 years, the acquisition of design agencies has undoubtedly accelerated the effort to push in-house innovation capabilities and promote innovation at scale. Organizations have been streamlining their innovation processes for over a decade using Lean Startup, Agile, and Design thinking. While these methods work, we often see new problems cropping up, only to slow down the process. What are these problems? How do they appear? And what do they look like? Even though design talent can be exceptional at imagining ideas for the future, organizations often overlook investing in skills that can effectively help navigate the flow of ideas through the innovation pipeline.

To fully understand this, let’s explore what it means to realize “innovation effectiveness” for your organization.

Innovation effectiveness refers to benefits an organization receives from its implementation of a given innovation (e.g., improvements in profitability, productivity, customer service, and employee morale).

Now, let’s simplify the path to innovation effectiveness in four steps,

First, Go beyond ‘Idea generation’ to ensure effective implementation of ideas.

Innovation Implementation

For totally new ideas, it is natural for organizational workflows to be tricky to navigate. Despite having buy-in at the top leadership level, we find a lack of motivation from organizational managers to support the innovation. To top it off, multiple barriers in the implementation lead to “innovation bottlenecks — which turns out to be the most challenging part of innovation implementation.

“As designers, we are trained to think of the perfect design of the offering as the end of our journey; however, it is barely just the beginning of the journey.” — Tom Kelley, 2016

In 2015, IDEO’s Tim Brown and Roger Martin described this challenge and explained how the introduction of the solution and its integration into the status quo — is even more critical to its success than the solution itself and called it the design of the “intervention.”

Unfortunately, in 2022, organizations are still struggling in both aspects — incorporating a design-led approach to creating the artifact and orchestrating the design intervention that would ensure implementation effectiveness.

Second, Use implementation effectiveness to drive innovation effectiveness.

Drive Innovation Success

In a research paper published in 1996, “The challenge of innovation implementation, the author clearly defines innovation implementation as the process of getting targeted organizational members’ to understand, commit and adopt an innovation. Implementing assumes there is a buy-in from the organizational leaders and that employees within the organization will use the innovation consistently. And that is not the case.

Over the years, I have found that companies struggling to implement innovation face one of these issues. Either there is a misalignment between the innovation efforts and overall business strategy, causing a lack of buy-in, or the organization is missing an essential skill of building a convincing case and winning commitment from the people to maximize the potential benefits of the innovation to be realized.

This is where Implementation Effectiveness comes into play. For ideas to flow smoothly and consistently, we must create favorable conditions for innovation to thrive. This implies establishing policies and procedures to constantly inspire and influence the use of innovation by all employees.

To identify and resolve implementation barriers = paving the path for innovation effectiveness. Yet, these barriers are often ignored or temporarily put out.

Third, Identify implementation barriers that cause innovation bottlenecks.

Implementation Barriers

During our engagements with global clients across various industries, we often find issues like redundancy in processes, loss in knowledge transfer between functions, and lack of cooperation. These are what we refer to as “innovation bottlenecks.”

We commonly hear leaders say, “Why can’t we be more collaborative?”, “Why is there such a disconnect between our teams?” or “Why can’t we make quicker progress?”, “Is there something wrong with the way we work?”

If you constantly see yourself returning to these questions, you need to identify these barriers and leverage the right mix of people from your organization to deal with them.

So, ask the critical question:

“How does our organization identify & resolve innovation bottlenecks that hinder the flow of ideas and impede innovation effectiveness?”

Innovation Bottlenecks

Most organizations that I have worked with typically face these three types of bottlenecks-

1. Bumps slow things down due to a lack of proper communication or delayed decision-making. By slowing down, organizations may lose their competitive advantage.

Bumps

2. Barricades are like walls through which ideas can’t get to the next level. Due to improper judgment, lack of resources, or interest in the organization, ideas are put on hold or prematurely killed eventually.

Barricades

3. Blind spots are the most insidious — unexpected, unpredictable moments nobody catches on time and doesn’t understand why or what is causing them. One function’s blind spot could be another one’s barricade.

Blind Spots

Bottlenecks may vary based on an organization’s size and maturity level in the innovation adoption cycle. These barriers can form at any stage of the innovation pipeline and most commonly occur when the idea moves between functions.

Fourth, Deal with bottlenecks — Find the right talent to sustain implementation effectiveness from within your organization.

When dealing with innovation and all the ambiguity and uncertainty that comes with it — you’ll often find yourself trying different things until something works (brute force). If you plan to scale these innovation processes, you will soon run out of energy and resources this way! Scaling innovation requires us to systematize innovation within the organization. We need the talent for both, to develop innovative ideas and to ensure the implementation is effective. We like to call these people ‘innovation catalysts’ (Watch a short video that describes innovation bottlenecks www.khojlab.com/narratives).

Back in 2011, Roger Martin introduced the concept of innovation catalysts as design-thinking coaches. However, to solve today’s problems, organizations need “innovation catalysts” to expand their role to achieve implementation effectiveness by identifying and eliminating barriers within organizational workflows.

Innovation catalysts can be anyone who has been in the organization for a while — engineers, technologists, scientists, designers, researchers, or leaders, as long as they have the qualities that enables them to identify the bottlenecks and proactively deal with them strategically.

We should not use old methods and frameworks to solve brand new problems of today. New mindset lenses and tools are needed to resolve bottlenecks for innovation through implementation effectiveness. Organizations have gotten better at creating a capability to support their creative invention phase of design, sidelining the disciplined implementation phase in a way that can restrict the growth and scaling of innovation.

A special thanks to the people who inspired us to create this content in this article: Palak Shah, Jim Long, Anijo Mathew, Surabhi Gokhale, Nyurka Fernandes, Ashwin Chikerur, and Trisha Saxena.

Image credits: Khoji Lab, Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Involving Employees in Decision-Making Processes

Leave a reply

Involving Employees in Decision-Making Processes

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the rapidly evolving landscape of 2025, the traditional top-down organizational structure is increasingly becoming a relic of the past. Organizations that thrive are those that recognize their most valuable asset isn’t their technology or their capital, but their people. And for people to truly be an asset, they must be empowered, engaged, and intimately involved in the decisions that shape their work and the future of the enterprise.

For decades, I’ve championed the cause of human-centered innovation. My message has consistently been that true innovation doesn’t happen in a vacuum, nor does it emerge solely from a corner office. It bubbles up from the collective intelligence, diverse perspectives, and lived experiences of every individual within an organization. This is why involving employees in decision-making processes isn’t just a “nice-to-have”; it’s a strategic imperative for resilience, agility, and sustained competitive advantage.

Why the Time is Now: The Unarguable Case for Empowerment

The arguments for employee involvement are stronger than ever. The velocity of change demands faster, more informed decisions. The complexity of modern business challenges often outstrips the capacity of a small leadership team to fully grasp. When you bring your entire workforce into the decision-making fold, you unlock a cascade of benefits that are simply non-negotiable for future success:

  • Enhanced Decision Quality: Diverse perspectives lead to a more comprehensive understanding of problems and a wider array of potential solutions. Those closest to the work often possess the most accurate, granular insights.
  • Increased Buy-in and Implementation Success: When employees are integral to crafting the solution, they inherently own it. This dramatically reduces resistance to change, accelerates adoption, and embeds solutions deeply within the operational fabric.
  • Boosted Employee Engagement and Morale: Feeling valued, heard, and impactful is a fundamental human need. Involvement fosters a profound sense of purpose, psychological safety, and belonging, creating a truly vibrant workplace.
  • Improved Innovation and Problem-Solving: A culture of authentic participation naturally encourages creative thinking, challenges the status quo, and cultivates a proactive, solution-oriented approach to identifying and addressing complex challenges.
  • Reduced Turnover: Empowered employees are happier, more fulfilled employees. They are significantly more likely to stay with an organization that respects their intelligence, values their contributions, and invests in their growth.

Beyond the Suggestion Box: Practical Approaches for Leaders

So, how do organizations move beyond token gestures and truly integrate employees into decision-making? It requires a fundamental shift in mindset from control to collaboration, and a steadfast commitment to structured, intentional processes. For leaders, this means:

  1. Cultivating Radical Transparency: Lay the groundwork by openly sharing context, challenges, and strategic goals. Employees can only contribute meaningfully if they understand the big picture. Transparency builds trust and enables truly informed contributions.
  2. Empowering Cross-Functional Teams and Task Forces: For specific projects or complex problems, convene diverse teams with representatives from all affected departments and levels. Grant these teams genuine autonomy to research, analyze, propose solutions, and even execute pilot programs.
  3. Leveraging Democratic Idea Generation Platforms: Utilize modern digital platforms (like enterprise social networks, dedicated innovation portals, or AI-powered ideation tools) where employees can submit ideas, collaboratively refine them, and democratically vote on their merit. This democratizes innovation.
  4. Implementing Participatory Budgeting: Involve teams or departments in decisions about how their operational budgets are allocated. This fosters a heightened sense of accountability, strategic thinking, and ownership at every level.
  5. Hosting Open Forums and Deliberative Dialogues: Create regular, facilitated opportunities for two-way dialogue between leadership and employees. These aren’t just Q&A sessions; they’re platforms for inviting challenging questions, candid feedback, and strategic suggestions on key organizational directions.
  6. Embracing “Wisdom of Crowds” Methodologies: For complex, high-stakes decisions, engage a representative sample of employees in structured deliberative polling exercises. This scientifically-backed approach gauges collective sentiment, uncovers hidden insights, and can often predict outcomes more accurately than small expert groups.

Case Study 1: “AgileSphere Innovations” – Redefining Product Roadmap for a Hyper-Competitive Market

AgileSphere Innovations, a leading enterprise software provider, faced a common challenge in 2023: their product roadmap was often perceived as being dictated by a few senior executives, leading to internal misalignment, delayed feature adoption, and occasional missed market opportunities in an increasingly competitive landscape.

Instead of the usual top-down annual planning cycle, AgileSphere launched “Co-Create the Future.” They implemented a quarterly “Innovation Sprint” where every employee, regardless of role or seniority, was invited to submit product feature ideas, improvements, and even entirely new product concepts. These ideas were then collaboratively refined, discussed, and voted upon within an internal, gamified ideation platform. The top 50 ideas would then be pitched in a company-wide virtual “Shark Tank” style event, judged by a diverse panel of executives and randomly selected employees. The winning ideas directly influenced the next quarter’s product roadmap, with allocated resources and dedicated, self-organizing teams formed around them.

Outcome: Within 18 months, AgileSphere reported a remarkable 30% increase in employee engagement scores related to “feeling heard” and “impact on company direction.” Crucially, three of their most successful product launches in 2024 originated directly from employee submissions through this process, including a groundbreaking AI-powered analytics dashboard that captured significant market share, validating the power of collective intelligence.

Case Study 2: “EcoHarvest Foods” – Optimizing Supply Chain Resilience in a Volatile World

EcoHarvest Foods, a sustainable food distributor operating across North America, experienced significant and costly disruptions in their supply chain during the global events of the early 2020s. Recognizing that the frontline workers in their warehouses, logistics, and procurement departments held invaluable operational knowledge often overlooked, they initiated “The Ground Up Initiative” in late 2022.

This initiative involved creating regional “Resilience Circles” – self-managing, cross-functional groups of 8-12 employees who met bi-weekly. Their mandate was to identify supply chain vulnerabilities, propose alternative sourcing strategies, and streamline internal processes. These circles were given genuine autonomy to pilot small-scale improvements and report their findings directly to a senior leadership steering committee. EcoHarvest also implemented a “Reverse Mentoring” program, where younger, digitally native employees mentored senior leaders on emerging technologies like blockchain for traceability and AI for demand forecasting, bridging critical knowledge gaps.

Outcome: By mid-2024, EcoHarvest Foods had reduced supply chain lead times by an average of 15% and diversified their critical supplier base by 25%, significantly enhancing their resilience against future disruptions. The initiative also led to a 10% reduction in operational waste through employee-identified process efficiencies, proving that empowering those closest to the problem leads to tangible, bottom-line results and a more sustainable enterprise.

Navigating the Path: Addressing Challenges and Empowering Leaders

While the benefits are clear, implementing broad employee involvement isn’t without its challenges. Leaders must be prepared to address:

  • Fear of Ceding Control: This is perhaps the biggest hurdle. Leaders must understand that empowering doesn’t mean losing control, but rather amplifying influence through shared ownership.
  • Information Overload: As more voices contribute, managing the influx of information requires robust digital tools and clear facilitation processes.
  • Ensuring Equitable Participation: Not everyone is comfortable speaking up. Leaders need to actively foster an inclusive environment where all voices feel safe and encouraged to contribute, leveraging anonymous feedback channels where appropriate.
  • Managing Expectations: Not every idea can be implemented. Transparent communication about why certain decisions are made, even when an employee’s specific idea isn’t chosen, is crucial.
  • Decision Fatigue: While involvement is good, not every decision requires broad consensus. Leaders must discern when broad input is vital versus when efficient, executive decision-making is necessary.

For leaders, this shift requires new muscles: active listening, empathetic facilitation, skillful synthesis of diverse inputs, and a genuine belief in the wisdom of their collective workforce. Invest in leadership development that focuses on coaching, collaboration, and building psychological safety.

Your Next Step: Ignite the Power Within

The future belongs to the organizations that democratize decision-making. Don’t wait for a crisis to realize the untapped potential within your workforce. Begin today by identifying one key decision area where employee input could be transformative. Open the dialogue. Trust your people. And watch as engagement soars, innovation accelerates, and your organization becomes truly future-proof. The journey to a human-centered enterprise starts with empowering every voice.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

‘Fail Fast’ is BS. Do This Instead

Leave a reply

'Fail Fast' is BS. Do This Instead

GUEST POST from Robyn Bolton

“Fail Fast”

It’s an innovation mantra uttered by everyone, from an entry-level programmer at a start-up to a Fortune 100 CEO.

But let’s be honest.

NO ONE WANTS TO FAIL!

(at any speed)

The reality is that we work in companies that reward success and relentlessly encourage us to become great at a specific skill, role, or function. As a result, our natural and rational aversion to failure is amplified, and most of us won’t even start something if there’s a chance that we won’t be great at it right away.

It’s why, despite your best efforts to encourage your team to take risks and embrace “failure,” nothing changes.

A Story of Failure?

A few weeks ago, while on vacation, I dusted off an old copy of Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain by Betty Edwards. As a kid, I was reasonably good at drawing, so I wasn’t worried about being bad, just rusty.

Then I read the first exercise: Before beginning instruction, draw each of the following:

  • “A Person, Drawn from Memory”
  • “Self-Portrait”
  • “My Hand”

I stared at the page. Thoughts raced through my head:

  • You have to be kidding me! These are the three most challenging things to draw. Even for a professional!
  • How am I supposed to do this without instructions?
  • Maybe I’ll skip this step, read the rest of the book to get the instructions I need, then come back and try this once I have all the information.
  • Forget it. I’m not doing this.

Confronted by not one but THREE things to be bad at, I was ready to quit.

Then I took a deep breath, picked up my trusty #2 pencil, and started to draw.

The results were terrible.

A Story of Success

It would be easy to look at my drawings and declare them a failure – my husband is missing his upper lip, I look like a witch straight out of Grimm’s Fairy Tales, and the thumb on my left hand is the same length as my index finger.

But I didn’t fail*.

I started

I did my best

I learned a lot

I did better the next time.

By these standards, my first attempts were a success**

Ask for what you want

Isn’t that what you want your team to do?

To stop analyzing and posturing and start doing.

To do their best with what they have and know now, instead of worrying about all the possibilities.

To admit their mistakes and share their learnings.

To respond to what they learned, even if it means shutting down a project, and keep growing.

Ask them to do those things.

Ask them to “Learn fast.”

Your people want to learn. They want to get smarter and do better. Encourage that.

Ask them to keep learning.

Your team will forget that their first attempt will be uncomfortable and their first result terrible. That’s how learning starts. It’s called “growing pains,” not “growing tickles,” for a reason.

Ask them to share what they learned.

Your team will want to hide their mistakes, but that doesn’t make anyone better or wiser. Sharing what they did and what they learned makes everyone better. Reward them for it.

Ask the team what’s next

It’s not enough to learn one thing quickly. You need to keep learning. Your team is in the trenches, and they know what works, what doesn’t, and why. Ask for their opinions, listen carefully, discuss, and decide together what to learn next.

You don’t want your team to fail.

You want them to succeed.

Ask them to do what’s necessary to achieve that

“Act Now. Learn Fast.”

*Achieving perfect (or even realistic) results on my first attempt is impossible. You can’t fail at something impossible

** To be clear, I’m not making a case for “participation trophies.”  You gotta do more than just show up (or read the book). You gotta do the work. But remember, sometimes success is simply starting.

Image Credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How to Measure Cultural Innovation Success

Leave a reply

How to Measure Cultural Innovation Success

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Every forward-thinking leader today understands that innovation isn’t just a buzzword; it’s the lifeblood of sustained competitive advantage. Yet, far too often, organizations fixate solely on tangible outputs: the shiny new product, the breakthrough patent, or the impressive market share gain. While these are certainly valuable, they represent only the tip of the iceberg. The true, resilient engine of innovation lies beneath the surface, embedded deep within an organization’s culture. Cultural innovation – the deliberate, systematic cultivation of an environment where new ideas flourish, experimentation is celebrated, and learning from failure is foundational – is what truly drives long-term success. But if it’s so critical, why does measuring its success feel like trying to catch smoke?

It’s a common misconception that culture is too amorphous to quantify. In truth, measuring cultural innovation success is not only possible but absolutely essential. Without it, you’re investing in an engine without a fuel gauge. This isn’t merely about tracking activities; it’s about understanding if innovation is truly woven into your organization’s DNA, creating a self-sustaining ecosystem that consistently delivers value.

Defining Cultural Innovation Success

Cultural innovation extends far beyond a dedicated R&D department or an annual hackathon. It signifies a profound shift where innovation becomes a collective responsibility, a daily habit, and a dynamic source of competitive edge. Success in this realm means:

  • Widespread Empowerment: Innovation is decentralized; every employee feels empowered and equipped to contribute, regardless of role.
  • Psychological Safety: Individuals are comfortable proposing unconventional ideas, challenging norms, and taking calculated risks, knowing that intelligent failure is a learning opportunity, not a career threat.
  • Continuous Experimentation & Learning: The organization exhibits a strong bias for action, rapid prototyping, and a disciplined approach to learning from every outcome, positive or negative.
  • Strategic Alignment: Innovation efforts are clearly linked to and support the overarching strategic objectives, ensuring resources are directed towards high-impact areas.
  • Customer & User Obsession: All innovative endeavors are deeply rooted in empathy, understanding, and solving genuine problems for customers and users.

Ultimately, a thriving innovation culture yields tangible business outcomes: accelerated growth, increased market relevance, enhanced operational efficiency, superior customer loyalty, and a magnetic ability to attract and retain top talent.

The Art and Science of Measurement

Traditional KPIs, while useful for operational performance, often miss the nuance of cultural shifts. The key to effective measurement lies in a pragmatic blend of quantitative data and rich qualitative insights. Crucially, we must balance lagging indicators (what happened) with leading indicators (what’s likely to happen) to build a predictive innovation capability.

Four Critical Dimensions for Measuring Cultural Innovation

1. Engagement & Capability Development

Are your people actively participating in and growing their innovation muscle?

  • Employee Innovation Index (Survey): A customized internal survey tracking comfort with new ideas, perceived leadership support, belief in the organization’s innovative future, and willingness to challenge status quo.
  • Ideation Platform Activity: Metrics on unique contributors, ideas submitted, comments, votes, and ideas advanced to prototyping.
  • Cross-functional Project Participation: Number of unique employees participating in inter-departmental innovation projects.
  • Innovation Skills Training: Participation rates and post-training application scores for design thinking, agile methodologies, or creativity workshops.

2. Experimentation & Learning Velocity

Is your organization building a systematic capability for rapid iteration and intelligent failure?

  • Number of Experiments Initiated & Completed: Tracking distinct exploratory projects across all business units.
  • Experiment Cycle Time: Average time from problem identification to validated learning (positive or negative).
  • Budget Allocated to Learning/Failed Ventures: A healthy sign is when a portion of innovation budget is intentionally set aside for experiments that may not succeed, viewed as “tuition.”
  • Learning Debriefs Conducted: Documented post-mortems or “pre-mortems” where teams systematically extract lessons from both successes and failures.

3. Impact & Value Creation (Lagging Indicators)

Are cultural shifts translating into measurable business and human capital value?

  • Revenue from New Offerings: Percentage of total revenue generated by products/services launched within the last 1-3 years.
  • Time-to-Market Reduction: Average time to bring new innovations to market (concept to commercialization).
  • Operational Efficiency Gains: Quantified savings or improvements from process innovations.
  • Customer Adoption & Satisfaction: For new products/services (e.g., Net Promoter Score, feature adoption rates).
  • Employee Retention & Attraction: Particularly for roles requiring creativity and problem-solving, as innovative cultures act as talent magnets.

4. Leadership & Environment Enablement

Are leaders actively championing, resourcing, and protecting the innovation space?

  • Leadership Innovation Index (360-degree Feedback): Measures how leaders are perceived in terms of supporting experimentation, fostering psychological safety, and championing new ideas.
  • Resource Allocation & Protection: Proportion of budget and dedicated time allocated to exploratory innovation (not just core operations), and evidence of protecting innovation teams from short-term pressures.
  • Recognition & Reward Systems: Diversity and frequency of employees recognized for innovative contributions (not just successful outcomes).
  • Strategic Communication Clarity: Employee understanding of the organization’s innovation vision, strategy, and their role in it.

Case Study: “Horizon Initiative” at a Global Tech Services Firm

A established global tech services firm, “SynthCorp,” was struggling to pivot from a project-delivery mindset to a product-led innovation strategy. Despite a strong engineering base, a rigid hierarchy and a “deliver-at-all-costs” culture led to risk aversion and siloed thinking, stifling internal product development. SynthCorp launched the “Horizon Initiative” to embed a culture of product-centric innovation and distributed ownership.

  • Intervention: They established “Product Guilds” – cross-functional communities of practice focused on specific tech domains, encouraging knowledge sharing and bottom-up ideation. A “Minimum Viable Product (MVP) Fund” was created, allowing teams to apply for small, rapid-deployment grants for experimental product ideas, with a clear mandate to “fail fast, learn faster.” Leadership started holding monthly “Innovation Showcases” where even early-stage, potentially failing MVPs were presented and celebrated for their learning value.
  • Measurement:
    • Before: Product development cycles averaged 18 months, 90% of R&D budget was dedicated to client-specific projects, and employee surveys showed low perceived autonomy (28%).
    • After (18 months): The number of internal MVPs launched jumped by 300%. The average time from concept to validated MVP dropped to 4 months. More importantly, 70% of employees reported feeling “empowered to experiment” (up from 15%). The MVP Fund yielded two highly successful internal product lines that generated $5M in new recurring revenue within 2 years. Crucially, the “fail fast” mentality significantly reduced the overall cost of failed large-scale projects by identifying issues earlier.

SynthCorp’s success was measured not just in new revenue, but in the dramatic acceleration of their learning loops and the measurable increase in employee ownership over product innovation.

Case Study: “Connect & Create” at a Non-Profit Healthcare Provider

A large regional non-profit healthcare provider, “CarePath,” was facing increasing operational inefficiencies and declining staff morale due to a perceived lack of voice. Innovation was seen as the domain of senior administration, and frontline staff felt disconnected from problem-solving. CarePath initiated “Connect & Create” to foster a grassroots culture of continuous improvement and patient-centric innovation.

  • Intervention: They implemented “Innovation Circles” – small, voluntary cross-departmental teams (e.g., nurses, administrative staff, technicians) empowered to identify and solve operational challenges within their units. A simple “Idea to Action” micro-grant program (up to $1,000) was established for small-scale improvements. Leadership launched a “Patient Impact Stories” campaign, regularly highlighting how staff-led innovations directly improved patient care and staff workflow.
  • Measurement:
    • Before: High staff turnover (18%), low scores on “opportunity to contribute ideas” in annual surveys (35%), and an average of 3 major patient complaints related to operational inefficiencies per month.
    • After (12 months): Over 150 “Innovation Circles” were active, leading to 80+ implemented process improvements across different departments. For example, a new patient check-in flow reduced wait times by 15%, and an improved medication tracking system reduced errors by 10%. Staff retention improved by 5%, and employee satisfaction scores for “feeling valued” increased by 20%. The number of patient complaints related to operational issues decreased by 50%.

CarePath’s triumph lay in transforming its frontline staff into powerful agents of change, demonstrating that cultural innovation can yield profound human and operational benefits, even in resource-constrained environments.

The Braden Kelley Mandate: Beyond Vanity Metrics

Remember, cultural innovation measurement is not about collecting vanity metrics. It’s about gaining actionable insights. Focus on leading indicators that genuinely predict your organization’s future ability to adapt and thrive. Always ground your quantitative data with rich qualitative context – the stories, observations, and deep insights that explain *why* the numbers are what they are. And, crucially, treat your measurement framework itself as an innovation; be prepared to iterate, refine, and adapt it as your culture evolves. Avoid rigid, one-size-fits-all approaches. Your measurement system should serve your innovation culture, not shackle it.

Measuring cultural innovation success is a continuous strategic imperative, not a periodic audit. It demands commitment, an agile mindset, and a willingness to look beyond the obvious. When executed thoughtfully, it illuminates the path forward, revealing the true power of an empowered, innovative workforce. It’s how you don’t just innovate, but how you become an innovation powerhouse.

Ready to Transform Your Innovation Culture?

Start by identifying 1-2 key cultural shifts you want to achieve. Then, select 2-3 actionable metrics from each dimension above that directly reflect those shifts. Begin measuring, learn, and iterate. The journey to a truly innovative culture starts with a single, measured step.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: 1 of 850+ FREE quote slides from http://misterinnovation.com

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Strategy for a Post-Digital World

Leave a reply

Strategy for a Post-Digital World

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

For decades, the dominant view of strategy was based on Michael Porter’s ideas about competitive advantage. In essence, he argued that the key to long-term success was to dominate the value chain by maximizing bargaining power among suppliers, customers, new market entrants and substitute goods.

Yet digital technology blew apart old assumptions. As technology cycles began to outpace planning cycles, traditional firms were often outfoxed by smaller competitors that were faster and more agile. Risk averse corporate cultures needed to learn how to “fail fast” or simply couldn’t compete.

Today, as the digital revolution is coming to an end, we will need to rethink strategy once again. Increasingly, we can no longer just move fast and break things, but will have to learn how to prepare, rather than just adapt, build deep collaborations and drive skills-based transformations. Make no mistake, those who fail to make the shift will struggle to survive.

Learning to Prepare Rather Than Racing to Adapt

The digital age was driven, in large part, by Moore’s law. Every 18 months or so, a new generation of chips would come out of fabs that was twice as powerful as what came before. Firms would race to leverage these new capabilities and transform them into actual products and services.

That’s what made agility and adaptation key competitive attributes over the past few decades. When the world changes every 18 months, you need to move quickly to leverage new possibilities. Today, however, Moore’s Law is ending and we’ll have to shift to new architectures, such as quantum, neuromorphic and, possibly, biological computers.

Yet the shift to this new era of heterogeneous computing will not be seamless. Instead of one fairly simple technology based on transistors, we will have multiple architectures that involve very different logical principles. These will need new programming languages and will be applied to solve very different problems than digital computers have been.

Another shift will be from bits to atoms, as fields such as synthetic biology and materials science advance exponentially. As our technology becomes infinitely more powerful, there are also increasingly serious ethical concerns. We will have to come to some consensus on issues like what accountability a machine should have and to what extent we should alter the nature of life.

If there is one thing that the Covid-19 crisis has shown is that if you don’t prepare, no amount of agility will save you.

Treating Collaboration as a New Competitive Advantage

In 1980, IBM was at an impasse. Having already missed the market for minicomputers, a new market for personal computers was emerging. So, the company’s leadership authorized a team to set up a skunk works in Boca Raton, FL. A year later, the company would bring the PC to market and change computer history.

So, it’s notable that IBM is taking a very different approach to quantum computing. Rather than working in secret, it has set up its Q Network of government agencies, academic labs, customers and start-ups to develop the technology. The reason? Quantum computing is far too complex for any one enterprise to pursue on its own.

“When we were developing the PC, the challenge was to build a different kind of computer based on the same technology that had been around for decades,” Bob Sutor, who heads up IBM’s Quantum effort, told me. “In the case of quantum computing, the technology is completely different and most of it was, until fairly recently, theoretical,” he continued. “Only a small number of people understand how to build it. That requires a more collaborative innovation model to drive it forward.”

It’s not just IBM either. We’re seeing similar platforms for collaboration at places like the Manufacturing Institutes, JCESR and the Critical Materials Institute. Large corporations, rather trying to crush startups, are creating venture funds to invest in them. The truth is that the problems we need to solve in the post-digital age are far too complex to go it alone. That’s why today, it’s not enough to have a market strategy, you need to have an ecosystem strategy.

Again, the Covid-19 crisis is instructive, with unprecedented collaborative efforts driving breakthroughs.

Drive Skills-Based Transformations

In the digital era, incumbent organizations needed to learn new skills. Organizations that mastered these skills, such as lean manufacturing, design thinking, user centered design and agile development, enjoyed a significant competitive advantage. Unfortunately, many firms still struggle to deploy critical skills at scale.

As digital technology enters an accelerated implementational phase, the need to deploy these skills at scale will only increase. You can’t expect to leverage technology without empowering your people to use it effectively. That’s why skills-based transformations have become every bit as important as strategic or technology-driven transformations.

As we enter the new post-digital era the need for skills-based transformations will only increase. Digital skills, such as basic coding and design, are relatively simple. A reasonably bright high school student can become proficient in a few months. As noted above, however, the skills needed for this new era will be far more varied and complex.

To be clear, I am not suggesting that everybody will need to have deep knowledge about things like quantum mechanics, neurology or genomics a decade from now any more than everybody needs to write code today. However, we will increasingly have to collaborate with experts in those fields and have some sort of basic understanding.

Making the Shift from Disrupting Markets to Pursuing Grand Challenges

The digital economy was largely built on disruption. As computer chips became exponentially faster and cheaper, innovative firms could develop products and services that could displace incumbent industries. Consider that a basic smartphone today can replace a bundle of technologies, such as video recorders, GPS navigators and digital music players, that would have cost hundreds of thousands of dollars when they were first introduced.

This displacement process has been highly disruptive, but there are serious questions about whether it’s been productive. In fact, for all the hype around digital technology “changing the world,“ productivity has been mostly depressed since the 1970s. In some ways, such as mental health and income inequality, we are considerably worse off than 40 or 50 years ago.

Yet the post-digital era offers us a much greater opportunity to pursue grand challenges. Over the next few decades, we’ll be able to deploy far more powerful technologies to solve problems like cancer, aging and climate change. It is, in the final analysis, these physical world applications that can not only change our lives for the better, but open up massive new markets.

The truth is that the future tends to surprise us and nobody can say for sure what the next few decades will look like. Strategy, therefore, can’t depend on prediction. However, what we can do is prepare for this new era by widening and deepening connections throughout relevant ecosystems, acquiring new skills and focusing on solving meaningful problems.

In the face of uncertainty, the best way to survive is to make yourself useful.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Regulations and Policies Promoting Sustainability

Leave a reply

Regulations and Policies Promoting Sustainability

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The drumbeat of sustainability has grown from a faint whisper to a resounding roar. Once relegated to the fringes of corporate social responsibility, sustainability is now a core strategic imperative for businesses, a critical concern for citizens, and an undeniable challenge for governments. But how do we truly accelerate this vital transition? The answer, surprisingly to some, lies not just in market forces or individual action, but significantly in the **intelligent application of regulations and policies.**

For too long, the narrative has often pitted regulation against innovation, suggesting that rules inherently stifle progress. As a practitioner of human-centered change and innovation, I argue precisely the opposite: thoughtfully designed regulations and policies are powerful catalysts for innovation, driving businesses to find more efficient, less impactful, and ultimately more profitable ways of operating. They create a level playing field, reward pioneering efforts, and fundamentally shift the calculus of what’s possible and profitable.

Beyond Compliance: The Dual Engine of “Push” and “Pull”

Effective regulations and policies operate on a sophisticated “push” and “pull” dynamic. **”Push” mechanisms** establish essential baselines, prohibit demonstrably harmful practices, and set minimum performance standards. Consider stringent emissions limits for industrial facilities, bans on certain toxic chemicals, or mandates for responsible waste disposal. These “push” measures compel businesses to directly confront and reduce their negative environmental footprint, often necessitating immediate operational adjustments.

However, the true transformative power often emerges from **”pull” mechanisms.** These incentives, subsidies, and market signals actively draw businesses towards desired sustainable behaviors, reward pioneering efforts, and cultivate vibrant markets for green products and services. Examples include generous tax credits for renewable energy installations, agricultural subsidies tied to sustainable farming practices, or government procurement policies that prioritize eco-certified goods. These “pull” forces don’t just mitigate harm; they proactively shape industries and economies towards a greener, more resilient future.

Case Study 1: The European Union’s Groundbreaking Circular Economy Action Plan

One of the most ambitious and comprehensive examples of policy driving systemic sustainability is the European Union’s **Circular Economy Action Plan**. Recognizing that our current linear “take-make-dispose” economic model is fundamentally unsustainable, the EU has embarked on a profound, systemic shift towards a circular economy. This visionary framework aims to minimize waste, keep resources in use for as long as possible, and design products for maximum durability, reuse, and recycling.

This isn’t a singular regulation but a holistic, interconnected suite of policies, including:

  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Mandating that producers bear responsibility for their products throughout their lifecycle, including collection and recycling. This “push” incentivizes designing products that are easier to recycle or reuse, fostering innovation in materials and reverse logistics.
  • Product Design Requirements (Ecodesign): New and expanded rules ensure products are inherently more durable, repairable, and recyclable. These ecodesign mandates now cover a broader range of products beyond energy-related goods, extending to textiles, furniture, and electronics. This directly challenges manufacturers to innovate in materials science, modular design, and even business models, promoting “product-as-a-service” offerings.
  • Ambitious Waste Management Targets: Stringent targets for recycling and waste reduction are set for member states, driving significant investment in advanced sorting, recycling technologies, and the infrastructure necessary for a circular economy.
  • Green Public Procurement (GPP): Public authorities are increasingly mandated or encouraged to leverage their substantial purchasing power to buy sustainable products and services. This creates a powerful “pull” market, signaling strong demand for circular solutions and accelerating their mainstream adoption.
  • Forthcoming Digital Product Passports: These passports will provide comprehensive, transparent information about a product’s origin, durability, repairability, and end-of-life options. This transparency empowers both consumers and businesses to make informed choices, simplifies repair processes, and streamlines material recovery, further pushing industries towards deeper circularity.

The tangible impact is evident: companies across Europe are fundamentally rethinking their entire value chains. This policy framework has spurred a remarkable surge in repair services, remanufacturing initiatives, and sophisticated material recovery solutions, demonstrating how policy can catalyze profound industrial transformation.

Case Study 2: Singapore’s Carbon Tax and Green Finance Initiatives

While many nations grapple with carbon pricing, Singapore offers a compelling case study of a nation implementing a **carbon tax** as a core policy tool to drive sustainability and innovation. Unlike cap-and-trade systems, a carbon tax provides a direct and predictable price signal, incentivizing businesses to reduce emissions. Singapore’s carbon tax, initially S$5 per tonne of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, is set to increase to S$25 per tonne in 2024-2025 and S$45 per tonne in 2026-2027, with a long-term goal of S$50-80 per tonne by 2030. This rising price signal creates a powerful “push” for companies to invest in energy efficiency, adopt cleaner technologies, and explore renewable energy sources.

Complementing this “push,” Singapore has also aggressively pursued **Green Finance initiatives** (a “pull” mechanism) to support this transition. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has launched various schemes, including:

  • Green Bond Grant Scheme: Encouraging the issuance of green bonds by companies to finance environmentally friendly projects.
  • Sustainable Bond Grant Scheme: Supporting the issuance of sustainability-linked bonds and other sustainable debt instruments.
  • Green and Sustainability-Linked Loan Grant Scheme: Providing grants for companies to obtain green and sustainability-linked loans, incentivizing financing for green projects and sustainable business practices.

The combination of a predictable carbon price and robust green finance mechanisms has spurred significant innovation in Singapore. Industries are actively seeking ways to decarbonize operations, from adopting industrial heat pumps and optimizing energy consumption to exploring carbon capture technologies. The financial sector is innovating new products and services to support green investments, creating a virtuous cycle where policy drives investment, and investment drives further sustainable innovation. This dual approach illustrates how a clear economic signal, coupled with supportive financial mechanisms, can effectively accelerate a nation’s sustainability agenda.

The Human Element: Orchestrating Mindset Shifts and Collaborative Action

Beyond the direct economic and technological shifts, effective regulations and policies play a crucial, often underestimated, role in shaping human behavior and fostering a pervasive culture of sustainability. When the “rules of the game” are redefined, individuals and organizations are compelled to adapt. While this adaptation can initially present challenges, it invariably ignites creativity and problem-solving, pushing boundaries that might otherwise remain untouched.

For policies to be truly impactful and foster continuous innovation, they must be meticulously crafted:

  • Clarity and Consistency: Businesses require certainty to commit to long-term strategic investments. Ambiguous or frequently shifting regulations breed hesitancy and undermine confidence.
  • Performance-Based, Not Prescriptive: Rather than dictating *how* a company must achieve sustainability (e.g., “you must use X technology”), policies should focus on *what* needs to be achieved (e.g., “reduce emissions by Y%”). This allows for diverse, innovative solutions tailored to specific contexts.
  • Collaborative Design and Iteration: Engaging a broad spectrum of stakeholders – industry leaders, academic experts, civil society organizations, and even citizens – in the policy-making process ensures that regulations are practical, effective, and perceived as fair. This collaborative approach also allows for continuous improvement and adaptation.
  • Supportive of Early Adopters and R&D: Policies should actively include mechanisms that reward pioneering efforts, provide incentives for research and development in sustainable technologies, and help de-risk crucial, but sometimes uncertain, sustainable investments.

The Intelligent Path Forward

The journey towards a truly sustainable future is not a passive current to be drifted upon. It demands intentional design, courageous leadership, and a collective willingness to embrace profound change. Regulations and policies, far from being shackles on the hands of progress, are in fact the essential guiding rails and powerful accelerators that can help us navigate the complex, intertwined terrain of environmental responsibility and economic prosperity.

By integrating a deep understanding of the human-centered aspects of change – how policies influence individual and organizational decision-making, encourage cross-sector collaboration, and unlock latent creativity – we can craft regulatory frameworks that not only mitigate environmental harm but actively promote a vibrant, innovative, and truly sustainable global economy. It’s time to champion policies that make sustainability not just an ethical imperative, but the intelligent, economically viable, and ultimately inevitable path forward.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Designing for the User Journey

Leave a reply

The Masterclass

Designing for the User Journey

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In a world obsessed with product features and service bells and whistles, many organizations miss the forest for the trees. They chase the next big innovation, pouring resources into standalone functionalities, yet wonder why their customers still drift away. The answer, often staring them in the face, is a fundamental disconnect with the user journey.

As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I’ve witnessed this pattern repeatedly: brilliant individual touchpoints failing to create a cohesive, compelling experience. A dazzling app launch, but a labyrinthine signup process. A responsive customer service team, but no proactive follow-up. This fragmented approach isn’t just inefficient; it’s a silent killer of loyalty and growth, leaving users feeling like cogs in a machine, not valued partners.

The user journey is not a simple linear path; it’s a complex, emotional landscape encompassing every single interaction a person has with your brand – from the very first fleeting thought of your offering to becoming a passionate advocate. To truly thrive in today’s fiercely competitive landscape, you must consciously, meticulously, and continuously design for this entire journey, transforming every touchpoint into a deliberate step towards a deeper, more meaningful relationship.

Why the User Journey is Your Ultimate Competitive Advantage

In an age of endless choice and instant gratification, a truly optimized user journey transcends mere differentiation; it becomes your most potent competitive weapon. It allows you to:

  • Forge Deep Empathy: By walking in your users’ shoes, you uncover their unspoken needs, latent desires, and hidden frustrations, enabling you to build solutions they genuinely crave.
  • Unleash Latent Value: Pinpoint and eliminate friction points that bleed revenue and customer satisfaction. Every moment of frustration is an opportunity for breakthrough innovation.
  • Amplify Resource Impact: Stop wasting effort on isolated features or campaigns. Direct your resources to the moments that truly shape user perception and drive business outcomes.
  • Cultivate Unbreakable Loyalty: Move beyond transactional relationships to emotional connections. A thoughtfully designed journey fosters trust, transforms users into repeat customers, and inspires fervent advocacy.
  • Ignite Continuous Innovation: The journey itself becomes a blueprint for future growth. By understanding the evolving needs across the entire lifecycle, you unlock new opportunities for strategic innovation and market leadership.

Mapping the Journey: Illuminating the Path to Growth

You cannot design what you do not understand. User journey mapping is not a theoretical exercise; it is a critical, data-driven investigation. It requires you to set aside assumptions and truly immerse yourself in the user’s world, capturing their motivations, actions, emotions, and interactions at every turn. This isn’t a one-and-done activity; it’s a living strategic asset.

Key elements that must inform your journey maps:

  • Refined User Personas: Go beyond demographics. What are their core goals? What influences their decisions? What keeps them up at night?
  • Distinct Stages: Segment the journey into clear phases (e.g., Discovery, Evaluation, Engagement, Retention, Advocacy) to provide structure.
  • Detailed Actions & Touchpoints: What exactly is the user doing, and where are they interacting with your brand (digital, physical, human)?
  • Emotional Landscape: Crucially, what are they feeling at each stage? Where are their moments of delight, confusion, or despair? Leverage qualitative data here.
  • Identified Pain Points & Opportunities: Systematically document obstacles and brainstorm potential solutions or new value propositions.
  • Key Metrics: How will you measure success at each stage? What are the conversion rates, satisfaction scores, or time-on-task metrics?

Case Study 1: Re-imagining Onboarding for a B2B SaaS Powerhouse

A leading B2B SaaS company faced a perplexing challenge: high acquisition numbers but alarming churn within the first 90 days. Their robust product was a sales success, yet new users weren’t sticking around. Initial analyses pointed to product complexity, but a deeper dive into the user journey revealed a critical flaw in their post-sale experience.

The Before: A Fragmented Hand-off

New customers were celebrated during sales, then dropped into a complex product dashboard with minimal, generic guidance. They’d receive a standard welcome email, then left to fend for themselves, leading to a flood of reactive support requests and, ultimately, disengagement. The journey felt less like an onboarding and more like an abandonment.

The After: A Proactive, Personalized Immersion

Through comprehensive journey mapping, including extensive user interviews and support ticket analysis, key insights emerged: new users felt overwhelmed, lacked clear starting points, and experienced a stark disconnect between sales promises and initial product experience.

The company redesigned the onboarding journey to be multi-channel and deeply personalized:

  1. Pre-emptive Welcome Kit: A physical kit arrived before their first login, containing a quick-start guide, branded materials, and a personal note from their dedicated Customer Success Manager (CSM), setting a tone of partnership.
  2. Tailored In-App Guided Tours: Post-login, an interactive tour highlighted features relevant to their specific use case (pre-identified during sales), ensuring immediate value realization.
  3. Proactive CSM Engagements: Scheduled, personalized calls from the CSM within days and weeks, offering bespoke advice and addressing nascent challenges.
  4. Contextual Micro-Learning: Embedded tooltips, short video tutorials, and AI-driven help within the application provided just-in-time support.
  5. Curated Content Drips: A strategic email sequence delivered bite-sized tips, success stories, and advanced use cases, subtly guiding their proficiency.

Impact: Within six months, new customer churn plummeted by 25%, and average daily active usage soared by 40%. The journey design transformed a liability into a powerful engine for customer retention and advocacy.

Case Study 2: Reigniting Connection at a Boutique Retail Store

A beloved local boutique, renowned for its curated fashion collections, observed a troubling trend: diminishing repeat visits. They initially blamed online giants, but a deeper dive into their in-store and post-purchase customer journey painted a different picture – one of missed opportunities for connection.

The Before: Transactional Efficiency

Customers enjoyed the shopping experience and friendly staff. Purchases were efficient, and returns were handled politely. However, once a customer left the store, the relationship largely ended. There was no compelling reason to return beyond the occasional need for new clothes; no community, no ongoing engagement.

The After: Building a Fashion Community

By mapping the entire customer journey – from discovering the store to post-purchase wear and even returns – the boutique identified critical gaps: a lack of ongoing personalization, no post-sale follow-up, and a missed opportunity to turn returns into positive interactions.

They reimagined the experience:

  1. Personal Style Profile: Encouraged customers to complete a voluntary “style profile” during their visit. This allowed staff to proactively recommend new arrivals, provide styling tips, and offer personalized shopping experiences via email or direct contact.
  2. Handwritten Gratitude & Care: Every purchase included a beautifully written thank-you note from the sales associate and detailed garment care instructions, adding a personal touch and enhancing product longevity.
  3. Exclusive Event Invitations: Email subscribers received invitations to VIP trunk shows, fashion workshops, and early access sales, making them feel like part of an inner circle.
  4. “Experience Returns” Philosophy: Returns were reframed not as a transaction to process, but as an opportunity to reinforce service. Staff would empathetically assist, offer alternative sizing/styles, and even provide on-the-spot alterations advice, ensuring the customer left feeling valued, even without a purchase.
  5. Private Style Community: A curated online group (e.g., a private Facebook community) was launched for loyal customers to share outfits, seek advice, and engage directly with the boutique’s stylists, fostering a sense of belonging.

Impact: Within 12 months, repeat customer visits surged by 15%, and organic word-of-mouth referrals became their strongest acquisition channel. The boutique successfully transformed from a retail space into a vibrant fashion community.

The Path Forward: Cultivating a Culture of Continuous Journey Innovation

Designing for the user journey is not a project to be completed; it is an organizational philosophy, an ongoing commitment to relentless improvement. The dynamism of user expectations, market trends, and technological advancements demands a perpetually evolving approach.

To embed continuous journey innovation into your organizational DNA:

  • Dismantle Silos: Break down the walls between departments. User journey design demands true cross-functional collaboration – marketing, sales, product, service, and technology must operate as one cohesive unit, sharing insights and accountability.
  • Build Robust Feedback Loops: Move beyond annual surveys. Implement real-time feedback mechanisms – user testing, analytics dashboards, social listening, direct interviews – and establish clear processes for acting on these insights promptly.
  • Embrace Agile Experimentation: Treat your user journeys as hypotheses. Implement changes in small, measurable iterations. Test, learn, refine, and scale what works. Failure is not an option; failure to learn from experiments is.
  • Champion Empathy at Every Level: Foster a culture where every employee, regardless of role, understands and internalizes the user’s perspective. Regularly share user stories, pain points, and success metrics to keep empathy front and center.
  • Invest in Journey Orchestration Technologies: Leverage CRM, marketing automation, and customer data platforms to create personalized, coherent experiences across diverse touchpoints.

By consciously and consistently designing for the user journey, organizations move beyond merely selling products or services. They build enduring relationships, create unforgettable experiences, and unlock sustainable growth. This is the true essence of human-centered innovation – not just meeting needs, but anticipating desires, delighting expectations, and transforming users into lifelong partners and fervent advocates.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How marketable is your invention?

Leave a reply

How marketable is your invention?

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers, M.D.

Marketability may apply to things i.e. goods or services or people. When it applies to people, we are talking about making them attractive to potential employers or clients. People may study for a degree to improve their marketability. This means that they believe that getting a degree improves their chances of getting either a job or a better job.

Are you looking for a non-clinical career job? Here is how to make yourself more marketable by building your personal brand.

When it applies to things, we are talking about their ability to be marketed or sold. If you are selling your house, you might improve its marketability if you convert the loft into a living area. In other words, converting the loft will make it easier to sell the house.

If you have invented a new medical device, how likely are the multiple stakeholders likely to buy, use or prescribe it? Will they choose it, use it or just lose interest in it? Is your product just another brown cow or is it a purple cow?  Is your new product sufficiently better than the standard of care for doctors to go to bat with administration to change vendors?

SmallBusiness.Chron.com has the following definition of the term:

“Marketability is a measure of whether a product will appeal to buyers and sell at a certain price range to generate a profit.”

The business model canvas is a way to validate your hypotheses about the desirability, feasibility, viability and adaptability of your idea.

But, how marketable is your product and how do you determine marketability in advance? Of course, there are no guarantees the dog will eat the food, but here are some things to consider:

  1. Early on, startups must identify the market type in which they plan to operate. In The Four Steps to the Epiphany, Steven G. Blank describes four different types of market:
  • Existing market
  • New market
  • Re-segmentation of an existing market as a low-cost player
  • Re-segmentation of existing market by employing a niche strategy

Winning in some markets is harder than others. For example, entering a “never been done before at scale”, like electric cars, is expensive and takes lot of convincing the early majority to buy it. On the other hand, the upside potential is enormous.

2. In markets where there are lots of stakeholders, personas and members of the buying group, like sickcare, you have to satisfy the jobs, pains and gains or each with a somewhat different value proposition for each one.

3. A “marketability evaluation” is what all inventors should have completed prior to attempting to market their invention. A marketability evaluation basically considers whether the invention is “marketable” within the current and future market. This is extremely important to you since a manufacturer will not license your patent rights for an invention that may be “really neat” but is not competitive with the other products currently on the market.

Here is a quick 20 Factor Invention Evaluation Form that you can complete yourself or have a friend complete. Remember, this form is only effective if you or your friend are honest with the scoring.

4. While you may have determined that your invention has a high marketability, the results are in the execution of your go to market strategy by your sales and marketing team.

5. Marketability exists in a particular moment in time and can easily change by competitive entries, and other threats.

6. The VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) world demands that you constantly test your ideas and explore and exploit new business models and products and their marketability.

7. Complacency erodes marketability.

8. Markets constantly change. The modern marketplace is unlike anything seen before in human history. For example, eCommerce allows anyone to order practically anything from anywhere in the world with virtual currency, often with the help of a virtual assistant that personalizes its recommendations so that each person’s buying journey is unique. In this new age, previously reigning marketing paradigms like the 4Ps of marketing are also undergoing a transformation. Welcome to the age of the 4Es instead.

The “4Es” of Marketing are “Experience”, “Everyplace”, “Exchange” and “Evangelism”. Anyone familiar with Marketing theory will recognize that the 4Es draw their basic wisdom from the famous “4P” mnemonic in modern marketing theory.

9. Many startup founders have low marketing IQs

10. Different business models require different marketing strategies and tactics, e.g. direct to patient marketing v B2B v B2B2C

11. Dissemination and implementation among healthcare professionals is a complicated and often unpredictable process. It often takes many years.

12. Successful social media marketing involves finding the right influencers and “sneezers” to help your idea go viral.

If you are a physician entrepreneur looking for investors, or an academic entrepreneur trying to commercialize your idea with your technology transfer office, then the first three questions you will have to answer are:

  1. What is your intellectual property and other barriers to entry?
  2. What is the technical and commercial feasibility of your product?
  3. What is the marketability of your product?

If you fail to convincingly answer these questions, it is likely that you will not pass GO and collect $200. But, given the dismal track record of investor’s and inventor’s new product success and portfolio returns, the exercise might all be marketability theater and just a Wild Ass Guess, that, ultimately, will be tested in the marketplace.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.