Tag Archives: wearables

Scanning the Horizon to Identify Emerging Trends and Human Needs

Scanning the Horizon to Identify Emerging Trends and Human Needs

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the fast-paced world of innovation, it’s easy to get caught up in the immediate, to react to the latest competitor move or market blip. But the most impactful innovators aren’t just responding to the present; they are anticipating the future. They have a panoramic view, constantly scanning the horizon for the subtle signals that reveal emerging trends and, more importantly, the underlying human needs driving them. This is the art of strategic foresight, and it is the single greatest competitive advantage in a world of constant change.

The distinction between a trend and a fad is crucial. A fad is a fleeting novelty—a temporary spike in popularity with no lasting impact. A trend, however, is a longer-term shift in consumer behavior, technology, or culture that is driven by a fundamental change in human needs or values. While a fad can be a fun distraction, a trend is a powerful current that will shape the future of markets, industries, and society itself. The challenge for innovators is to identify these currents and understand what they mean for the people we serve.

Scanning the horizon is a deliberate, multi-faceted practice. It goes beyond simple market research and requires a blend of curiosity, empathy, and strategic thinking. It involves:

  • Observing Anomalies: Paying attention to the small, strange things that don’t fit the current narrative. The early adopters of a new technology, the unexpected success of a niche product, or a new social movement. These are often the first whispers of a major trend.
  • Connecting Disparate Fields: Looking at what is happening in seemingly unrelated industries or domains. A breakthrough in materials science might be a signal for a future innovation in retail or healthcare.
  • Engaging with Lead Users: Identifying and deeply engaging with the customers who are ahead of the curve. These “lead users” often have unmet needs that the mass market will develop in the future. Their struggles and workarounds are a goldmine of innovation opportunities.
  • Synthesizing Data with Empathy: Combining quantitative data (what people are doing) with qualitative insights (why they are doing it). The data can show you the “what,” but a deep, human-centered understanding will reveal the “why,” which is where true innovation is born.

Case Study 1: The Rise of the Sharing Economy

The Challenge: Shifting Human Needs and Asset Utilization

Before the emergence of companies like Airbnb and Uber, the concept of a sharing economy was not a mainstream idea. The world was dominated by an ownership-based model, where owning a car or a home was the primary goal. However, beneath the surface, a number of social and economic trends were quietly changing human needs. Younger generations were increasingly prioritizing experiences over ownership, urban populations were growing, and people were looking for ways to generate extra income from underutilized assets. These were the subtle signals of a massive shift in how people valued and accessed resources.

The Innovation:

Innovators at Airbnb and Uber didn’t invent the concept of sharing a room or a ride. They saw the emerging human needs and built platforms that leveraged technology to make it easy, trustworthy, and scalable. They addressed the core human needs for **flexibility, connection, and economic empowerment**. Airbnb tapped into the desire for authentic, local travel experiences and a new source of income for homeowners. Uber addressed the need for convenient, on-demand transportation and created a flexible work opportunity for drivers. They built trust into their systems through ratings and reviews, which was a critical component of their success.

The Results:

By connecting these disparate trends—the rise of mobile technology, changing generational values, and the desire for economic flexibility—these companies created entirely new industries. They didn’t just compete with existing hotels or taxi companies; they created a new paradigm for how people think about asset utilization and human-centered services. The result was not just a successful business, but a fundamental change in how we live, work, and travel.

Key Insight: The most transformative innovations often emerge from connecting seemingly unrelated trends and building a trusted platform to meet a new, underlying human need.

Case Study 2: Personalized Health and Wellness

The Challenge: The Shift from Reactive to Proactive Health

For a long time, healthcare was a largely reactive industry. We went to the doctor when we were sick. However, innovators began to notice a growing trend: people were becoming more proactive about their health. The increasing awareness of diet, exercise, and mental health was creating a new human need for **personalization, agency, and prevention**. The rise of digital technology, from wearables to at-home genetic testing, was a powerful enabler of this trend, but the core driver was a fundamental desire for more control and information about one’s own well-being.

The Innovation:

A new wave of companies emerged to meet this need. They developed products and services that moved beyond a one-size-fits-all approach. Wearable technology, like the Apple Watch, didn’t just tell time; it empowered users with continuous data about their heart rate, activity levels, and sleep patterns. At-home genetic testing companies offered insights into ancestry and health predispositions, satisfying a deep human curiosity and desire for self-knowledge. App-based wellness platforms provided personalized fitness plans, guided meditations, and nutrition advice, bringing professional-level wellness coaching to the palm of a user’s hand.

The Results:

By scanning the horizon and recognizing the shift from reactive to proactive health, these innovators created a massive new market for personalized health and wellness. They didn’t just sell a product; they sold a sense of **empowerment and control** over one’s own health journey. This has not only created billion-dollar companies but has also contributed to a broader societal change, making health and wellness a core part of our daily lives, rather than a periodic reaction to illness. The key was understanding that the technology was just a tool; the true innovation was meeting a human need for a more personalized and proactive approach to well-being.

Key Insight: True innovation lies in recognizing a fundamental shift in human values and building technology that serves a new, deeply felt need for control and personalization.

The Path Forward: From Trend-Spotting to Human-Centered Foresight

The practice of scanning the horizon is more than a predictive exercise; it’s an act of deep empathy. It requires us to listen carefully, to observe with an open mind, and to ask ourselves not just “what’s next?” but “what will people need next?” The most successful innovators understand that a great innovation isn’t just about a clever idea; it’s about a deep, resonant connection to a human need that is just beginning to emerge. By formalizing this process of strategic foresight and grounding it in a human-centered approach, we can move from being passive observers of the future to active creators of it. It’s time to put on our binoculars and start looking past the noise of today, toward the meaningful signals of tomorrow.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Rise of Digital Health: What Does it Mean for the Future?

The Rise of Digital Health: What Does it Mean for the Future?

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

The healthcare industry has taken a decidedly digital approach to patient care in recent years. The rise of digital health technologies, from telemedicine to wearables, is changing how patients are treated, how diseases are managed, and how doctors communicate with each other. But what does this trend mean for the future of healthcare? This article examines a few examples of digital health technology and their potential implications for the industry as a whole.

Case Study 1 – Telemedicine

The first example of digital health technology is telemedicine. Telemedicine is the use of video conferencing, the telephone, email, or other electronic means of communication for medical care. Telemedicine has been hailed as a way to help increase access to medical care, allowing patients to communicate with remote providers, saving time, and reducing costs associated with transportation and other factors. What’s more, telemedicine can also reduce patient wait times and provide care in areas where healthcare services may not be readily available. In rural areas, for example, telemedicine can offer much needed access to specialists or treatments that may not be available locally.

Case Study 2 – Wearables

Another area of digital health technology is wearables. Wearables are devices, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers, that measure and transmit real-time patient data. Used in conjunction with healthcare applications, wearables can help monitor and manage chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Additionally, wearables can be used to track and monitor patient activity, diet, and other lifestyle factors in order to provide useful insights. Furthermore, integrated with healthcare technologies, wearables can be used provide customized advice and treatments for patients, allowing providers to better understand and address patient needs.

Conclusion

Digital health technology is already proving to be a valuable asset to the healthcare industry, and its implications for the future are numerous. As the cost of care continues to rise and access to medical care remains limited in many areas, digital health technology can offer an effective and cost-effective solution to improve patient outcomes and bring greater efficiencies to medical care. From easier access to remote providers to better monitoring and management of chronic conditions, there is no doubt that digital health technologies will continue to shape the future of healthcare.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovating Beyond the Device to the Connected Life

Internet of Things (IoT) as a Service

LAST UPDATED: February 4, 2026 at 4:03PM

Innovating Beyond the Device to the Connected Life

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the early days of the Internet of Things (IoT), the conversation was dominated by the hardware. Engineers and executives obsessed over sensor precision, battery longevity, and connectivity protocols. We were, quite literally, enamored with the “thing.” But as we move into a more mature era of digital transformation, we are discovering that the true value of IoT lies not in the silicon, but in the human outcomes it enables.

The transition from selling a product to providing IoT as a Service (IoTaaS) represents a fundamental shift in business logic. It is the move from a transactional relationship — where the connection ends at the point of sale — to a continuous, relational model. When we innovate beyond the device, we begin to design for the “Connected Life,” where technology recedes into the background to facilitate seamless, human-centered experiences.


From Products to Outcomes

Most organizations suffer from a product-centric myopia. They ask, “How can we make this toaster ‘smart’?” instead of asking, “How can we help our customers enjoy a more frictionless morning?” The “smart” toaster is a gadget; the frictionless morning is a service. IoT as a Service is about capturing the data generated by devices to provide proactive, predictive, and personalized value.

To succeed here, leaders must overcome what I call Organizational Friction. This friction occurs when legacy departments — built for shipping boxes — try to manage a recurring service model. It requires a new metabolic rate for the company, shifting from annual product launches to daily software updates and continuous customer success management.

“Innovation isn’t about the gadget in the hand; it’s about the invisible threads of value that weave technology into the fabric of a person’s daily life. If your IoT strategy starts with a sensor and ends with a dashboard, you haven’t built a service — you’ve built a digital chore.”

— Braden Kelley


Case Studies: Transforming the Connected Experience

Case Study A: Predictive Maintenance as a Safety Service

A global elevator manufacturer realized that their customers — building managers — didn’t actually want to own complex machinery; they wanted guaranteed uptime. By transitioning to an IoTaaS model, the company equipped thousands of elevators with vibration and heat sensors. Instead of waiting for a breakdown (and the subsequent tenant complaints), the system uses Agentic AI to predict failures before they occur. The service model shifted from “Break-Fix” to “Continuous Mobility.” Result: A 25% increase in contract renewal rates and a significant reduction in emergency repair costs, as technicians are dispatched with the right parts before the elevator ever stops moving.

Case Study B: The “Connected Health” Lifestyle Ecosystem

A leading medical device company produced high-quality CPAP machines for sleep apnea. However, patient compliance was notoriously low. They pivoted from selling a breathing device to offering a “Restorative Sleep Service.” By connecting the device to a mobile app that tracked sleep quality and provided personalized coaching, they turned a sterile medical obligation into a lifestyle improvement tool. They integrated with smart home lighting to gradually brighten the room during the lightest phase of the patient’s sleep cycle. By focusing on the human-centered outcome (waking up refreshed) rather than just the airflow, patient adherence increased by 40%, and the company created a recurring revenue stream through premium coaching tiers.


Reclaiming Time through Connectivity

A core tenet of my work on Temporal Agency is that we should design conditions where time stops bullying us. IoTaaS is a primary tool for this. When a home ecosystem manages its own energy consumption, replenishes its own consumables, and schedules its own repairs, it returns “cognitive bandwidth” to the human occupant. We move from being managers of our things to being conductors of our lives. Innovation in this space should be measured by the time reclaimed by the user, not the minutes spent inside an app.

The promise of the Internet of Things was never about smarter objects. It was about better lives. Yet far too many IoT initiatives stall after launch, celebrated as technical achievements while failing to deliver meaningful, sustained value.

IoT as a Service (IoTaaS) represents the necessary evolution. It shifts innovation beyond the device and toward the connected life—where technology quietly adapts to human needs, continuously improves, and delivers outcomes people actually care about.

As I often say, “Technology earns its place in our lives not by being impressive, but by being indispensable.”

Why Devices Are the Wrong Finish Line

When organizations treat a connected device as the end product, they lock innovation into a moment in time. Needs change. Contexts shift. Software ages. Hardware depreciates.

IoT as a Service reframes the device as a starting point rather than a finish line. Sensors, connectivity, and analytics become ingredients in an ongoing relationship—one where value compounds through learning, adaptation, and trust.

This model aligns directly with human-centered design. People do not want more features; they want fewer worries. They do not want data; they want clarity. They do not want control panels; they want confidence.

Case Study C: Rolls-Royce and Outcome-Based Aviation

Rolls-Royce transformed aviation services through its Power by the Hour model, an early and enduring example of IoT as a Service.

Rather than selling jet engines and charging separately for maintenance, Rolls-Royce guarantees engine availability. Embedded sensors stream performance data continuously, enabling predictive maintenance and real-time optimization.

The airline buys certainty, not machinery. Rolls-Royce aligns revenue with uptime, not repairs.

The breakthrough was not technical. It was philosophical. By shifting from product ownership to outcome delivery, Rolls-Royce redefined its role from supplier to partner.

Case Study D: Philips and Lighting That Learns

Philips applied IoTaaS thinking to lighting, offering illumination as a service rather than fixtures as assets.

Connected lighting systems adapt automatically to occupancy, daylight, and usage patterns. Data informs energy efficiency, safety, and employee well-being. Customers pay for performance and experience, not infrastructure.

This approach allows lighting systems to evolve alongside organizational needs. As buildings change, so does the service. Innovation continues long after installation.

The device disappears. The experience remains.

Human-Centered Principles for IoT as a Service

Successful IoTaaS solutions are designed around people, not platforms. They prioritize:

  1. Trust, through transparency and responsible data use.
  2. Simplicity, by automating complexity instead of exposing it.
  3. Adaptability, ensuring the service improves as contexts change.

When these principles are ignored, connected systems feel invasive or fragile. When they are honored, IoT becomes quietly essential.

“The ultimate measure of a connected system is not how much data it collects, but how much effort it removes from human lives.”

The Strategic Payoff

For organizations, IoT as a Service delivers more than recurring revenue. It creates learning systems that strengthen over time. It fosters ecosystems instead of isolated products. It transforms innovation from a project into a capability.

Most importantly, it keeps companies anchored to what matters: evolving human needs in an unpredictable world.

The future of IoT will not be won by the most devices deployed. It will be won by those who design the most meaningful connected lives.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between IoT and IoT as a Service?

Traditional IoT focuses on the hardware and the data it collects. IoT as a Service (IoTaaS) focuses on the continuous value and outcomes delivered to the customer through that data, often shifting from a one-time purchase to a subscription or performance-based model.

How does human-centered design apply to IoT?

Human-centered design in IoT ensures that technology solves real human pain points rather than just adding digital complexity. It involves looking at the user’s journey and using connectivity to remove friction and increase the user’s agency over their time and environment.

What is “Organizational Friction” in the context of IoT?

Organizational Friction refers to the internal resistance a company faces when trying to move from a product-selling mindset to a service-providing mindset. This includes challenges in billing, customer support, and the rapid pace of software-driven innovation.


SPECIAL BONUS: Braden Kelley’s Problem Finding Canvas can be a super useful starting point for doing design thinking or human-centered design.

“The Problem Finding Canvas should help you investigate a handful of areas to explore, choose the one most important to you, extract all of the potential challenges and opportunities and choose one to prioritize.”

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Is there a market for Smartwatches? Can Apple create one?

Stikkee 3 - Apple Watch

Okay, it’s been a week since the Apple Watch was announced, and do you know what the world’s most popular wearable is likely to be for 2014/2015?

It’s not the iWatch, but the iPhone 6, which is breaking the pre-sales records of the iPhone 5.

No, it’s not an iWatch. Don’t you dare call it that!

We’re Apple and we’ve decided that it’s far too sophisticated and exclusive to be an iWatch.

Oh, and we’ve also decided that you must own at least an iPhone 5 to be privileged enough to wear an Apple Watch.

Okay, so instantly Apple has reduced the potential market size for the Apple Watch from 6 Billion people to about 100 million people (based on statisticbrain’s numbers).

Now, layer on top of this the fact that in a YPulse survey of millenials, only 32% stated that they wear a watch regularly.

$96 million of smartwatches were sold between October and July according to CNet at an average price of $189 (and dropping fast) – often bundled with a phone – and with Samsung wrapping up 78% of the market. If you do the math, that’s just over 500,000 units, less than 1% of the likely iPhone 5 sales over the same period.

The Apple Watch starts at $349.

But wait, we’re not done yet.

Consider that Samsung has become a faster, nimbler innovator in some ways than Apple and are shipping a new version of their smartwatch next month, up to six months before the Apple Watch is expected to be available – oh, and you’ll be able to use their new watch to make phone calls and run lots of wellness apps (including some from Nike). Plus Samsung will probably launch an even more capable version shortly after the Apple Watch starts shipping.

Apple’s already playing catchup in the smartphone market and they haven’t even shipped their first unit.

So if Apple is entering a small market with a declining average unit price against a more nimble competitor, what rabbit do they have up their sleeve to grow the market and increase their stock price?

What will make the Apple Watch a must have?

The iPod was a must have because it allowed you to carry your entire music library around with you after easily organizing it on your PC and syncing it to the iPod. After that you could then easily navigate thousands of songs on the device with the handy click wheel.

The iPhone was a must have because it became the world’s most widely adopted personal, wearable computer. The iPhone disrupted the balance of power in the mobile phone industry and allowed device makers to start offering whatever applications they wanted (unencumbered by the carriers). The iPhone also disrupted the digital camera market, the Flip (super portable, simple video cameras), and the dedicated GPS market.

Other wearables are on the decline.

iPod sales in Q4 2013 were down 52% from Q4 2012.

Google Glasses got a lot of buzz early on, but interest has fizzled.

Fitbits and Nike Fuelbands have lost their luster and momentum.

Even the iPad, which became a must have after Apple solved the Value Translation riddle and properly highlighted its benefits as a more relaxing and accessible computing device, has seen sales fall the past two quarters as the large screen phones have started to become big enough to begin decreasing the need for a separate tablet. If you’re keeping score the iPad disrupted the gaming industry and challenged people to think deeply about their computing device preferences.

Now back to the Apple Watch…

Can a smartwatch really unseat the mother of all wearables, the smartphone?

In an era of declining interest in watches, can Apple change people’s behavior and lead a resurgence in watch wearing?

These are all very tough questions, but they are not tough challenges that Apple hasn’t faced before.

It’s easy to forget that the iPod didn’t become a runaway success until two years after its launch (with the launch of the PC version of iTunes), and that it took a year for Apple to really ramp up sales of the iPhone (after the launch of the App Store), or that Apple got killed in the press after the announcement of the iPad but figured out how to translate its value by the time they started shipping it.

So, is Apple up to the challenge this time?

After their recent string of game-changing innovations the pressure is on!

Please note the following licensing terms for Stikkee Situations cartoons:

1. BLOGS – Link back to https://bradenkelley.com/category/stikkees/ and you can embed them for free
2. PRESENTATIONS, please send $25 to me on PayPal by clicking the button 3. NEWSLETTERS & WEB SITES, please send me $50 on PayPal by clicking the button
License for presentations - $25
License for newsletters and web sites - $50

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Will Health Sensors Make iWatch the Must Have Wearable?

iWatch Concept with Health SensorsBack in the 1990’s NBC referred to Thursday night as must watch television, and when it comes to making the transformation from invention to innovation, an innovation often needs a ‘Must Have’ feature.

So, with rumors swirling about the potential introduction today of an Apple iWatch, will Health Sensors make the iWatch a ‘Must Have’ or a ‘Must Wear’?

Will the iWatch do to the Fitbit and Nike Fuelband what the iPhone did to the Flip video camera?

If so, it will be yet another example of how it is more important to build a product or service that moves people. Move them not in a spiritual way (although creating something akin to a spiritual experience can help), but in an emotional way where the product or service (through value creation, value access, and value translation) provides enough ‘Must Have’ (or at least ‘Must Try’) to move people to abandon their existing solution (even if it is the ‘Do Nothing’ solution) to try and ultimately adopt your new solution in large numbers.

Moving people in this way is what moves your product or service from being an invention, to being an innovation.

Will the purported ten sensors of the iWatch provide enough entertainment, functionality, and actionable information to make the iWatch a ‘Must Wear’, make it a device that you won’t want to take it off?

If Apple can pull that off, then they will have a huge hit on their hands.

Are they too early like Samsung?

Have they seeded an ecosystem to grow after the launch of the iWatch?

After all it was the ecosystem created around the App Store that turned the iPhone into the market leader, it was the ecosystem created around the iTunes Store (and a Windows version of the software to access it) that turned the iPod into the market leader.

Or is it too early for Apple to launch an iWatch?

What ten sensors would make an iWatch a ‘Must Wear’?

  1. Accelerometer
  2. Pulse monitor
  3. NFC
  4. Blood pressure monitor?
  5. Temperature sensor?
  6. Barometric pressure sensor?
  7. ?
  8. ?
  9. ?
  10. ?

I guess we’ll find out next year.

Image Credit: techradar


Build a common language of innovation on your team

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.