Tag Archives: Microsoft

The Killer Strategic Concept You’ve Never Heard Of

You Really Need to Know About Schwerpunkt!

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, his first mission was not to create but destroy. He axed a number of failing products and initiatives, such as the ill-fated Newton personal digital assistant and the Macintosh clones. Under Jobs, Apple would no longer try to be all things to all people.

What came after was not a flurry of activity, but a limited number of highly targeted moves. First came the candy-colored iMac. It was a modest success. Then came the iPod, iPhone and iPad, breakout hits which propelled Apple from a failing company to the most valuable company on earth. Each move shifted the firm’s center of gravity to a decisive point and broke through.

That, in essence, is the principle of Schwerpunkt, a German military term that roughly translates to “focal point.” Jobs understood that he didn’t have to win everywhere, just where it mattered and focused Apple’s resources on just a few meaningful products. The truth is that good strategy relies less on charts and analysis than on finding your Schwerpunkt.

Putting Relative Strength Against Relative Weakness

The iPod, Apple’s first major hit after Jobs’ return, didn’t do anything to undermine the dominance of Microsoft and the PC, but rather focused Apple’s energy on a nascent, but fragmented industry that made products that, as Jobs put it, “sucked.” At this early stage, Apple probably couldn’t have taken on the computer giants, but it mopped up these guys.

Yet the move into music players wasn’t just about picking on scrawny weaklings, it leveraged some of Apple’s unique strengths, especially its ability to design simple, easy-to-use interfaces. Jobs’ own charisma and stature, not to mention the understanding of intellectual property rights he gained from his Pixar business, made him almost uniquely placed to navigate the challenges of setting up iTunes store, which at the time was a quagmire.

In Good Strategy | Bad Strategy management scholar Richard Rumelt makes the point that good strategy puts relative strength to bear against relative weakness and that is a key part of Schwerpunkt. In order to find your focal point, you need to get a sense of where your strengths lie and where are the best opportunities to leverage those strengths.

That’s exactly what Steve Jobs did at Apple over and over again. Entering the music player business would not have worked for Microsoft or Dell, who both dominated the computer industry at the time. In fact, after the launch of the iPod both tried to create competitors and failed. The iPod was Apple’s Schwerpunkt, nobody else’s.

Identifying The Focal Point

In a military conflict, leaders determine where to concentrate their efforts by weighing a variety of factors, including commander’s intent, or the desired end state, the situation on the ground gleaned through intelligence, the terrain and the enemy’s disposition on that terrain. Officers spend their whole careers learning how to make wise decisions about schwerpunkt.

Business leaders need to weigh similar factors, including the internal capabilities of their organization such as talent, technology and information, the market context, the competitive landscape as well as what they can access through external partner ecosystems. By the time Steve Jobs returned to Apple, he had become a master at evaluating the forces at play.

With respect to the iPod, he felt confident in Apple’s ability to combine technology with design and that the market for digital music players, as he liked to put it, sucked. By looking at what competitors had to offer, he was confident that if he could create a device that would “put 1000 songs in my pocket,” he would have a hit product.

The only problem was that the technology to create such a product didn’t exist yet. That’s where the external ecosystem came in. On a routine trip to Japan to meet with suppliers, an engineer at Toshiba mentioned that the company developed a tiny memory drive that was about the size of a silver dollar, but didn’t know what it could be used for.

Jobs immediately recognized that the memory drive was his Schwerpunkt. He produced a $10 million check on the spot and got exclusive rights to the technology. Not only would he be able to create his iPod with the “1000 songs in my pocket” he so coveted, for a time at least, none of his competitors would be able to duplicate its capability.

Getting Inside The OODA Loop

When he was still a pilot, the legendary military strategist John Boyd developed the OODA loop to improve his own decision making in the cockpit. The idea is that you first OBSERVE, your surroundings, then you ORIENT that information in terms of previous knowledge and experiences. That leads you to DECIDE and ACT, which will change the situation in some way, that you will need to observe, orient, decide and act upon.

We can see how Steve Jobs employed the OODA loop in making the decision to immediately produce a $10 million dollar check for a technology that Toshiba had no idea what to do with. He took the new information he observed and immediately oriented it with previous observations he made about the market for digital music devices.

Yet what happened next was even more interesting. When the iPod came out, it was an immediate hit, which changed the basis of competition. Other computer companies, which were competing in the realm of laptops, desktops and servers, suddenly faced a very different market and moved to create their own digital music players. Dell’s Digital Jukebox launched in 2004, Microsoft’s Zune came out in 2006. Both failed miserably.

By then Apple was already preparing the launch of the iPhone, which would change the game again, causing its competitors to Observe, Orient, Decide in Act in reaction to what Apple was doing. Boyd called this “getting inside your opponent’s OODA Loop.” By continually having to orient and react to Apple, they weren’t able to gain the initiative.

Today, it’s hard to remember just how powerful firms like Microsoft and Dell were back then, but they were absolute giants. Nevertheless, by employing the concept of Schwerpunkt, Apple went from near bankruptcy to dominating its rivals in less than a decade.

A Journey Rather Than A Destination

The biggest strategic mistake you can make is to try and win everywhere at once. To win, you need to prevail in the decisive battles, not the irrelevant skirmishes. That, in essence, is the principle of Schwerpunkt—to identify a focal point where you can direct your resources and efforts.

When Steve Jobs returned to Apple, computer companies were duking it out in the PC market, yet he identified digital music players as his Schwerpunkt and the iPod made Apple a serious player. As his competitors were still reacting, he launched the iPhone and on it went. Whenever Steve Jobs would, towards the end of a product presentation say, “and just one more thing,” You could guarantee that he had identified a new Schwerpunkt.

Notice how Schwerpunkt is a dynamic, not a static, concept. It was Jobs’ ability to constantly innovate Apple’s approach, by constantly observing, reorienting and shifting the competitive context. In each case, his strategy was uniquely suited to Apple’s, capabilities, customers and ecosystem. Competitors Microsoft or Dell, more suited to the enterprise market, couldn’t be successful with a similar approach.

There is no ideal strategy, just ones that are ideally suited to a particular context, when relative strength can be brought to bear against relative weakness. Discovering the center of gravity at which you can break through is more of a journey than a destination, you can never be sure beforehand where exactly you will find it, but it will become clear once you’ve arrived.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Unsplash

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Big Companies Should Not Try to Act Like Startups

Leave a reply

Big Companies Should Not Try to Act Like Startups

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

In 2009, Jeffrey Immelt set out on a journey to transform his company, General Electric, into a 124 year old startup. Although it was one of the largest private organizations in the world, with 300,000 employees, he sought to become agile and nimble enough to compete with high-flying Silicon Valley firms.

It didn’t end well. In 2017, problems in the firm’s power division led to massive layoffs. Immelt was forced to step down as CEO and GE was kicked off the Dow after 110 years. The company, which was once famous for its sound management, saw its stock tank. Much like most startups, the effort had failed.

Somewhere along the line we got it into our heads that large firms can’t innovate and should strive to act like startups. The truth is that they are very different types of organizations and need to innovate differently. While large firms can’t move as fast as startups, they have other advantages. Rather than try to act like startups, they need to leverage what they have.

Driving Innovation At Scale

The aviation industry is dominated by big companies. With a typical airliner costing tens of millions of dollars, there’s not much room for rapid prototyping. It takes years to develop a new product and the industry, perhaps not surprisingly, moves slowly. Planes today look pretty much the same as ones made decades ago.

Looks, however, can be deceiving. To understand how the aviation industry innovates, consider the case of Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner. Although it may look like any other airplane, Boeing redesigned the materials within it. So a 787 is 20 percent lighter and 20 percent more efficient than similar models. That’s a significant achievement.

Developing advanced materials is not for the faint of heart. You can’t do it in a garage. You need deep scientific expertise, state-of-the-art facilities and the resources to work for years—and sometimes decades— to discover something useful. Only large enterprises can do that,

None of this means that startups don’t have a role to play. In fact one small company, Citrine Informatics, is applying artificial intelligence to materials discovery and revolutionizing the field. Still, to take on big projects that have the potential to make huge global impacts, you usually need a large enterprise.

Powering Startups

All too often, we see large enterprises and startups as opposite sides of the coin, with big companies representing the old guard and entrepreneurs representing the new wave, but that’s largely a myth. The truth is that innovation often works best when large firms and small firms are able to collaborate.

Scott Lenet, President of Touchdown Ventures, sees this first-hand every day. His company is somewhat unique in that, unlike most venture capital firms, it manages internal funds for large corporations. He’s found that large corporations are often seen as value added investors because of everything they bring to the table.

“For example,” he told me, “one of our corporate partners is Kellogg’s and they have enormous resources in technical expertise, distribution relationships and marketing acumen. The company has been in business for over 100 years and it’s learned quite a bit about the food business in that time. So that’s an enormous asset for a startup to draw on.”

He also points out that, while large firms tend to know how to do things well, they can’t match the entrepreneurial energy of someone striving to build their own business. “Startups thrive on new ideas,” Lenet says “and big firms know how to scale and improve those ideas. We’ve seen some of our investments really blossom based on that kind of partnership.”

Creating New Markets

Another role that large firms play is creating and scaling new markets. While small firms are often more agile, large companies have the clout and resources to scale and drive impact. That often also creates opportunities for entrepreneurs as well.

Consider the case of personal computers. By 1980, startups like Apple and Commodore had already been marketing personal computers for years, but it was mostly a cottage industry. When IBM launched the PC in 1981, however, the market exploded. Businesses could now buy a computer from a supplier that they knew and trusted.

It also created fantastic opportunities for companies like Microsoft, Intel and a whole range of entrepreneurs who flocked to create software and auxiliary devices for PCs. Later startups like Compaq and Dell created PC clones that were compatible with IBM products. The world was never the same after that.

Today, large enterprises like IBM, Google and Amazon dominate the market for artificial intelligence, but once again they are also creating fantastic opportunities for entrepreneurs. By accessing the tools that the tech giants have created through APIs, small firms can create amazing applications for their customers.

Innovation Needs Exploration

Clearly, large firms have significant advantages when it comes to innovation. They have resources, customer relationships and deep expertise to not only invent new things, but to scale businesses and bring products to market. Still, many fail to innovate effectively, which is why the average lifespan of companies on the S&P 500 continues to decline.

There’s no reason why that has to be true. The problem is that most large organizations spend so much time and effort fine-tuning their operations to meet earnings targets that they fail to look beyond their present business model. That’s not due to any inherent lack of capability, it’s due to a lack of imagination.

Make no mistake, if you don’t explore, you won’t discover. If you don’t discover you won’t invent and if you don’t invent you will be disrupted. So while you need to focus on the business at hand, you also need to leave some resources un-optimized so that you can identify and develop the next great opportunity.

A good rule of thumb to follow is 70-20-10. Focus 70% of your resources on developing your present business, 20% of your resources on opportunities adjacent to your current business, such as new markets and technologies and 10% on developing things that are completely new. That’s how you innovate for the long term.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog and previously appeared on Inc.com
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Four Change Empowerment Myths

Leave a reply

Four Change Empowerment Myths

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

We live in a transformational age. Powerful technologies like the cloud and artificial intelligence are quickly shifting what it means to compete. Social movements like #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter are exposing decades of misdeeds and rewriting norms. The stresses of modern life are creating new expectations about the relationship between work and home.

Every senior manager and entrepreneur I talk to understands the need to transform their enterprise, yet most are unsure of how to go about it. They ordinarily don’t teach transformation in business school and most management books minimize the challenge by reducing it to silly platitudes like “adapt or die.”

The truth is that change is hard because the status quo always has inertia on its side. Before we can drive a true transformation, we need to unlearn much of what we thought we knew. Change will not happen just because we want it to, nor can it be willed into existence. To make change happen, we first need to overcome the myths that tend to undermine it.

Myth #1: You Have To Start With A Bang

Traditionally, managers launching a new initiative have aimed to start big. They work to gain approval for a sizable budget as a sign of institutional commitment. They recruit high-profile executives, arrange a big “kick-off” meeting and look to move fast, gain scale and generate some quick wins. All of this is designed to create a sense of urgency and inevitability.

That works well for a conventional initiative, but for something that’s truly transformational, it’s a sure path to failure. Starting with a big bang will often provoke fear and resistance among those who don’t see the need for change. As I explain in my book, Cascades, real change always starts with small groups, loosely connected, united by a shared purpose.

That’s why it’s best to start off with a keystone change that represents a concrete and tangible goal, involves multiple stakeholders and paves the way for future change. That’s how you build credibility and momentum. While the impact of that early keystone change might be limited, a small, but successful, initiative can show what’s possible.

For example, when the global data giant Experian sought to transform itself into a cloud-based enterprise, it started with internal API’s that had limited effect on its business. Yet those early achievements spurred on a full digital transformation. In much the same way, when Wyeth Pharmaceuticals began its shift to lean manufacturing, it started with a single process at a single plant. That helped give birth to a 25% reduction of costs across the board.

Myth #2: You Need A Charismatic Leader And A Catchy Slogan

When people think about truly transformational change, a charismatic leader usually comes to mind. In the political sphere, we think of people like Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela. On the corporate side, legendary CEOs like Lou Gerstner at IBM and Steve Jobs at Apple pulled off dramatic turnarounds and propelled their companies back to prosperity.

Yet many successful transformations don’t have a charismatic leader. Political movements like Pora in Ukraine and Otpor and Serbia didn’t have clear leadership out front. The notably dry Paul O’Neill pulled of a turnaround at Alcoa that was every bit as impressive as the ones at IBM and Apple. And let’s face it, it wasn’t Bill Gates’s Hollywood smile that made Microsoft the most powerful company of its time.

The truth, as General Stanley McChrystal makes clear in his new book, Leaders: Myth and Reality, is that leadership is not so much about great speeches or snappy slogans or even how gracefully someone takes the stage, but how effectively a leader manages a complex ecosystem of relationships and builds a connection with followers.

And even when we look at charismatic leaders a little more closely, we see that it is what they did off stage that made the difference. Gandhi forged alliances between Hindus and Muslims, upper castes and untouchables as well as other facets of Indian society. Mandela did something similar in South Africa. Martin Luther King Jr. was not a solitary figure, but just one of the Big Six of civil rights.

That’s why McChrystal, whom former Defense Secretary Bob Gates called, “perhaps the finest warrior and leader of men in combat I had ever met,” advises that leaders need to be “empathetic crafters of culture.” A leader’s role is not merely to plan and direct action, but to inspire and empower belief.

Myth #3: You Need To Piece Together A Coalition

While managing stakeholders is critical, all too often it devolves into a game theory exercise in which a strategically minded leader horse trades among competing interests until he or she achieves a 51% consensus. That may be enough to push a particular program through, but any success is bound to be short-lived.

The truth is that you can’t transform fundamental behaviors without transforming fundamental beliefs and to do that you need to forge shared values and a shared consciousness. It’s very hard to get people to do what you want if they don’t already want what you want. On the other hand, if everybody shares basic values and overall objectives, it’s much easier to get everybody moving in the same direction.

For example, the LGBT movement foundered for decades by trying to get society to accept their differences. However, when it changed tack and started focusing on common values, such as the right to live in committed, loving relationships and to raise happy, stable families, public opinion changed in record time. The differences just didn’t seem that important any more.

In a similar vein, when Paul O’Neill took over Alcoa in 1987, the company was struggling. So analysts were puzzled that when asked about his strategy he said that “I intend to make Alcoa the safest company in America.” Yet what O’Neill understood was that safety goes part and parcel with operational excellence. By focusing on safety, it was much easier to get the rank and file on board and, when results improved, other stakeholders got on board too.

Myth #4: You Will End With The Vision You Started With

When Nelson Mandela first joined the struggle to end Apartheid, he was a staunch African nationalist. “I was angry at the white man, not at racism,” he would later write. “While I was not prepared to hurl the white man into the sea, I would have been perfectly happy if he climbed aboard his steamships and left the continent of his own volition.”

Yet Mandela would change those views over time and today is remembered and revered as a global citizen. In fact, it was the constraints imposed by the broad-based coalition he forged that helped him to develop empathy, even for his oppressors, and led him to govern wisely once he was in power.

In much the same way, Lou Gerstner could not have predicted that his tenure as CEO at IBM would be remembered for its embrace of the Internet and open software. Yet it was his commitment to his customers that led him there and brought his company back from the brink of bankruptcy to a new era of of prosperity.

And that is probably the most important thing we need to understand change. In order to make a true impact on the world, we first need to change ourselves. Every successful journey begins not with answers, but with questions. You have to learn how to walk the earth and learn things along the way. You know you’ve failed only when you end up where you started.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog and an earlier version appeared on Inc.com
— Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Ethical AI in Innovation

Leave a reply

Ensuring Human Values Guide Technological Progress

Ethical AI in Innovation

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In the breathless race to develop and deploy artificial intelligence, we are often mesmerized by what machines can do, without pausing to critically examine what they should do. The most consequential innovations of our time are not just a product of technical prowess but a reflection of our values. As a thought leader in human-centered change, I believe our greatest challenge is not the complexity of the code, but the clarity of our ethical compass. The true mark of a responsible innovator in this era will be the ability to embed human values into the very fabric of our AI systems, ensuring that technological progress serves, rather than compromises, humanity.

AI is no longer a futuristic concept; it is an invisible architect shaping our daily lives, from the algorithms that curate our news feeds to the predictive models that influence hiring and financial decisions. But with this immense power comes immense responsibility. An AI is only as good as the data it is trained on and the ethical framework that guides its development. A biased algorithm can perpetuate and amplify societal inequities. An opaque one can erode trust and accountability. A poorly designed one can lead to catastrophic errors. We are at a crossroads, and our choices today will determine whether AI becomes a force for good or a source of unintended harm.

Building ethical AI is not a one-time audit; it is a continuous, human-centered practice that must be integrated into every stage of the innovation process. It requires us to move beyond a purely technical mindset and proactively address the social and ethical implications of our work. This means:

Bias Mitigation: Actively identifying and correcting biases in training data to ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable for all users.
Transparency and Explainability: Designing AI systems that can explain their reasoning and decisions in a way that is understandable to humans, fostering trust and accountability.
Human-in-the-Loop Design: Ensuring that there is always a human with the authority to override an AI’s judgment, especially for high-stakes decisions.
Privacy by Design: Building robust privacy protections into AI systems from the ground up, minimizing data collection and handling sensitive information with the utmost care.
Value Alignment: Consistently aligning the goals and objectives of the AI with core human values like fairness, empathy, and social good.

Case Study 1: The AI Bias in Criminal Justice

The Challenge: Automating Risk Assessment in Sentencing

In the mid-2010s, many jurisdictions began using AI-powered software, such as the COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions) algorithm, to assist judges in making sentencing and parole decisions. The goal was to make the process more objective and efficient by assessing a defendant’s risk of recidivism (reoffending).

The Ethical Failure:

A ProPublica investigation in 2016 revealed a troubling finding: the COMPAS algorithm was exhibiting a clear racial bias. It was found to be twice as likely to wrongly flag Black defendants as high-risk compared to white defendants, and it was significantly more likely to wrongly classify white defendants as low-risk. The AI was not explicitly programmed with racial bias; instead, it was trained on historical criminal justice data that reflected existing systemic inequities. The algorithm had learned to associate race and socioeconomic status with recidivism risk, leading to outcomes that perpetuated and amplified the very biases it was intended to eliminate. The lack of transparency in the algorithm’s design made it impossible for defendants to challenge the black box decisions affecting their lives.

The Results:

The case of COMPAS became a powerful cautionary tale, leading to widespread public debate and legal challenges. It highlighted the critical importance of a human-centered approach to AI, one that includes continuous auditing, transparency, and human oversight. The incident made it clear that simply automating a process does not make it fair; in fact, without proactive ethical design, it can embed and scale existing societal biases at an unprecedented rate. This failure underscored the need for rigorous ethical frameworks and the inclusion of diverse perspectives in the development of AI that affects human lives.

Key Insight: AI trained on historically biased data will perpetuate and scale those biases. Proactive bias auditing and human oversight are essential to prevent technological systems from amplifying social inequities.

Case Study 2: Microsoft’s AI Chatbot “Tay”

The Challenge: Creating an AI that Learns from Human Interaction

In 2016, Microsoft launched “Tay,” an AI-powered chatbot designed to engage with people on social media platforms like Twitter. The goal was for Tay to learn how to communicate and interact with humans by mimicking the language and conversational patterns it encountered online.

The Ethical Failure:

Within less than 24 hours of its launch, Tay was taken offline. The reason? The chatbot had been “taught” by a small but malicious group of users to spout racist, sexist, and hateful content. The AI, without a robust ethical framework or a strong filter for inappropriate content, simply learned and repeated the toxic language it was exposed to. It became a powerful example of how easily a machine, devoid of a human moral compass, can be corrupted by its environment. The “garbage in, garbage out” principle of machine learning was on full display, with devastatingly public results.

The Results:

The Tay incident was a wake-up call for the technology industry. It demonstrated the critical need for **proactive ethical design** and a “safety-first” mindset in AI development. It highlighted that simply giving an AI the ability to learn is not enough; we must also provide it with guardrails and a foundational understanding of human values. This case led to significant changes in how companies approach AI development, emphasizing the need for robust content moderation, ethical filters, and a more cautious approach to deploying AI in public-facing, unsupervised environments. The incident underscored that the responsibility for an AI’s behavior lies with its creators, and that a lack of ethical foresight can lead to rapid and significant reputational damage.

Key Insight: Unsupervised machine learning can quickly amplify harmful human behaviors. Ethical guardrails and a human-centered design philosophy must be embedded from the very beginning to prevent catastrophic failures.

The Path Forward: A Call for Values-Based Innovation

The morality of machines is not an abstract philosophical debate; it is a practical and urgent challenge for every innovator. The case studies above are powerful reminders that building ethical AI is not an optional add-on but a fundamental requirement for creating technology that is both safe and beneficial. The future of AI is not just about what we can build, but about what we choose to build. It’s about having the courage to slow down, ask the hard questions, and embed our best human values—fairness, empathy, and responsibility—into the very core of our creations. It is the only way to ensure that the tools we design serve to elevate humanity, rather than to diminish it.

Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Navigating Disruption with Clarity

Leave a reply

Purpose as Your North Star

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world defined by constant disruption, where technologies, markets, and customer needs shift at an unprecedented pace, organizations are often left feeling adrift. The old playbooks of strategic planning and forecasting are proving insufficient to navigate the volatility. In this environment of chronic uncertainty, I believe the most powerful anchor for any organization is a clearly defined and deeply embedded sense of purpose. Purpose, when authentically articulated and lived, acts as a North Star, providing clarity, inspiring action, and uniting a workforce to not just survive disruption, but to thrive within it.

Purpose is more than just a mission statement or a marketing slogan. It is the fundamental reason an organization exists beyond making a profit. It is the why behind the what. When a company’s purpose is its guiding light, it helps leaders and employees make better decisions, prioritize more effectively, and remain resilient in the face of setbacks. Purpose creates a shared sense of meaning that transcends individual roles and responsibilities, fostering a culture of trust and collective commitment. It gives people a reason to come to work every day that is bigger than a paycheck.

Navigating disruption with purpose requires a human-centered approach to strategy. It’s about moving from a rigid, top-down model to one that is driven by a shared sense of why. This enables organizations to adapt more quickly, as everyone is aligned on the ultimate goal, even if the path to get there needs to change. An organization with a strong purpose will find that its people are more engaged, more innovative, and more willing to go the extra mile. The key elements for leveraging purpose as a navigational tool include:

Authenticity: The purpose must be genuine and deeply ingrained in the company’s DNA, not an afterthought.
Clarity: The purpose must be simple, clear, and easy for every employee to understand and articulate.
Alignment: All business decisions, from product development to hiring, should be evaluated against the organization’s purpose.
Empowerment: Employees must be empowered to act on the purpose, not just told what it is. This fosters ownership and bottom-up innovation.
Storytelling: The organization’s purpose should be constantly reinforced through stories that illustrate its impact on customers, communities, and employees.

Case Study 1: Patagonia’s Environmental Activism as a Business Strategy

The Challenge: Competing in a Fast-Fashion Market with a Commitment to Sustainability

Patagonia, the outdoor apparel company, operates in a highly competitive market often driven by low prices and rapid consumption. The company’s business model, which prioritizes durability and environmental responsibility, stands in stark contrast to the fast-fashion industry. Navigating this landscape while remaining true to its values presented a constant challenge.

The Purpose-Driven Strategy:

Patagonia’s purpose is “We’re in business to save our home planet.” This isn’t just a slogan; it is the core of their business strategy. Every decision, from material sourcing to marketing campaigns, is evaluated through this lens. When faced with disruption, such as a downturn in the economy, Patagonia doesn’t compromise on its purpose. Instead, it doubles down, knowing that its loyal customer base values this commitment. For example, during Black Friday, a time when most retailers encourage consumption, Patagonia famously ran a campaign telling customers, “Don’t Buy This Jacket.” This counterintuitive approach reinforced their purpose and created an even stronger connection with their customers. Their commitment to their purpose has allowed them to attract top talent, build a fiercely loyal community, and remain profitable while staying true to their core values.

The Results:

Patagonia has not only survived but thrived by leveraging its purpose as a navigational tool. It has demonstrated that a strong, authentic purpose is a powerful source of competitive advantage and resilience. The company’s clear “why” has enabled it to make bold decisions that might seem risky from a traditional business perspective, but which ultimately resonate deeply with its customers and employees. This case study shows that a purpose-driven approach provides a clear framework for navigating disruption, allowing a company to stand out and build a sustainable business in the long term.

Key Insight: An authentic and unwavering purpose can act as a powerful differentiator and a source of competitive advantage, enabling an organization to make bold, values-aligned decisions that build long-term loyalty and resilience.

Case Study 2: Microsoft’s Cultural Transformation under Satya Nadella

The Challenge: A Stagnant Culture and Missed Opportunities in a Rapidly Changing Tech Landscape

In the early 2010s, Microsoft was widely perceived as a company that had lost its way. Its culture was siloed and competitive, and it had missed key shifts in the tech industry, such as the rise of mobile computing. The company was in a state of internal turmoil, lacking a unified vision to guide it through the ongoing disruption. New leadership was needed to redefine the company’s direction and reignite innovation.

The Purpose-Driven Strategy:

When Satya Nadella became CEO, he didn’t start with a new product strategy; he started with purpose. He re-framed Microsoft’s mission to “empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more.” This purpose was intentionally broad and human-centered. It was a clear departure from the company’s past focus on “putting a computer on every desk.” This new North Star guided every subsequent strategic decision, from embracing open-source software and cloud computing to acquiring LinkedIn and GitHub. The purpose served as a unifying force, helping different business units collaborate and innovate together. It allowed the company to pivot into new markets with a clear sense of direction, moving beyond its traditional software dominance.

The Results:

Nadella’s purpose-driven leadership led to a remarkable cultural and business renaissance at Microsoft. The company’s stock price soared, and it regained its position as a global technology leader. By using a clear and human-centered purpose as its guide, Microsoft was able to navigate the complex and disruptive tech landscape with newfound clarity and agility. This case study demonstrates how a renewed sense of purpose, when effectively communicated and integrated into the culture, can act as a powerful engine for change, enabling a large organization to reinvent itself and thrive in a period of intense disruption.

Key Insight: Reclaiming and re-framing an organization’s purpose can serve as the most effective catalyst for a large-scale cultural transformation and business revitalization.

Making Purpose Your Guiding Light

In an era of relentless disruption, a clearly defined purpose is no longer a luxury—it is an essential strategic asset. It provides the clarity needed to make tough decisions, the inspiration required to foster innovation, and the resilience necessary to weather any storm. As leaders, our role is not just to set a course, but to articulate a compelling “why” that will serve as our collective North Star. By putting purpose at the center of our strategy, we can move from being passive observers of change to active agents of a future we are all proud to create.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Crafting Your Change Story

Leave a reply

A Blueprint for Influence

Crafting Your Change Story

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

From my work around the world, guiding organizations through transformative journeys, I’ve learned a fundamental truth: change, no matter how necessary or beneficial, is rarely embraced without a compelling narrative. Data, logic, and strategic plans are crucial, but they often fail to move hearts and minds. The secret to influencing others and driving meaningful adoption lies in crafting a powerful change story – a narrative that resonates emotionally, clarifies the need for change, and paints a vivid picture of a desirable future.

Human beings are wired for stories. Narratives help us make sense of the world, connect with others, and find meaning in complex situations. A well-crafted change story does more than just communicate information; it builds empathy, overcomes resistance, and inspires action. It answers the fundamental questions people have when faced with change: Why is this happening? What’s in it for me? What will the future look like? And how can I be a part of it? Without a compelling story, even the most well-intentioned change initiatives can falter and fail.

Crafting an effective change story is a human-centered endeavor. It requires us to understand the perspectives, fears, and aspirations of those we are trying to influence. It’s not about dictating a new reality, but about co-creating a shared understanding and a collective vision. A powerful change story typically includes the following elements:

The Current State: A clear and relatable picture of where things are now, highlighting the pain points or limitations that necessitate change.
The Inciting Incident: The catalyst or event that makes the need for change undeniable.
The Vision of the Future: A compelling and aspirational depiction of what the future will look like after the change is successfully implemented, emphasizing the benefits and opportunities.
The Journey: A roadmap outlining the steps involved in moving from the current state to the desired future, acknowledging potential challenges and offering reassurance.
The Call to Action: A clear and concise request for individuals to get involved and contribute to the change.

Case Study 1: Satya Nadella’s Transformation of Microsoft

The Challenge: Reversing a Stagnant Culture and Declining Innovation

In the early 2010s, Microsoft, once a dominant force in technology, was perceived as stagnant and out of touch. Its culture was often described as competitive and siloed, hindering collaboration and stifling innovation. The company’s stock price had plateaued, and it was missing out on key emerging trends like mobile and cloud computing. The need for a significant shift in direction and culture was evident.

The Change Story:

When Satya Nadella took over as CEO in 2014, he didn’t just issue a new strategic plan; he crafted a compelling change story centered around empathy, a growth mindset, and empowering others. He painted a picture of a future where Microsoft was not just about Windows, but about empowering every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. He spoke openly about the need to move from a “know-it-all” culture to a “learn-it-all” culture, emphasizing continuous learning and collaboration. He highlighted the missed opportunities of the past (the current state) and articulated a vision of a more open, collaborative, and innovative Microsoft (the vision of the future). His actions, such as embracing Linux and open-source technologies, served as powerful “inciting incidents” that demonstrated his commitment to this new direction. The “journey” involved fostering a culture of experimentation and empowering employees to take risks. His consistent communication and focus on shared goals acted as a continuous “call to action.”

The Results:

Nadella’s change story resonated deeply within Microsoft and with the broader tech community. The company underwent a significant cultural transformation, leading to renewed innovation in areas like cloud computing (Azure), AI, and gaming (Xbox). Microsoft’s stock price soared, and it re-established itself as a leader in the technology industry. His success demonstrates the power of a human-centered change story to inspire a large and complex organization to embrace a new identity and achieve remarkable results.

Key Insight: A compelling change story, rooted in empathy and a clear vision, can transform a stagnant culture and reignite innovation within a large organization.

Case Study 2: The Cleveland Clinic’s Patient-First Initiative

The Challenge: Enhancing Patient Experience and Outcomes in Healthcare

In the early 2000s, the Cleveland Clinic, a renowned medical center, recognized the need to move beyond a purely clinical focus and prioritize the overall patient experience. While known for its medical expertise, there was an opportunity to enhance the emotional and human aspects of patient care, leading to improved outcomes and greater patient satisfaction. The “current state” involved patients often feeling like a number rather than an individual with unique needs and concerns.

The Change Story:

The leadership at Cleveland Clinic embarked on a “Patients First” initiative, crafting a powerful change story that emphasized empathy, communication, and a holistic approach to care. The “inciting incident” was the growing recognition that excellent medical treatment alone was not enough; patients needed to feel heard, respected, and supported throughout their healthcare journey. The “vision of the future” was a healthcare system where every patient felt valued, informed, and cared for as an individual. The “journey” involved training staff in empathy and communication skills, redesigning processes to be more patient-centered, and empowering caregivers to go the extra mile. Stories of exceptional patient care were regularly shared and celebrated, reinforcing the “call to action” for every employee to embrace this new philosophy. The leadership consistently communicated the message that a focus on the patient experience was not just the right thing to do, but also essential for maintaining the Clinic’s reputation and attracting patients.

The Results:

The “Patients First” initiative led to significant improvements in patient satisfaction scores, increased employee engagement, and a stronger sense of purpose among caregivers. The Cleveland Clinic reinforced its reputation as a leader in patient care, attracting patients from around the world. This case study highlights how a human-centered change story focused on empathy and a shared commitment to a core value (patients first) can transform a complex service organization and lead to tangible improvements in both the human experience and organizational outcomes.

Key Insight: A change story that prioritizes empathy and focuses on a shared value can transform a service-oriented organization and significantly enhance the customer or patient experience.

Your Blueprint for Influence

Crafting your change story is not a one-time event; it’s an ongoing process of communication, adaptation, and reinforcement. By understanding the power of narrative and focusing on the human element of change, you can move beyond simply announcing a new direction to truly inspiring a movement. Whether you are leading a small team or a large organization here in the United States or across the globe, remember that every successful change begins with a story that resonates, connects, and compels action. Take the time to craft your narrative, listen to your audience, and lead with empathy. The blueprint for influence lies within the power of your story.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Design Standards for Inclusivity

Leave a reply

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

“The world is not designed for everyone.”

This stark reality, often hidden in plain sight, is the driving force behind the urgent need for robust design standards for inclusivity. As a thought leader in human-centered change and innovation, I’ve witnessed countless organizations stumble in their efforts to serve diverse populations, not out of malice, but out of a lack of intentional design. Inclusivity isn’t merely a “nice-to-have” add-on; it’s a fundamental pillar of sustainable innovation, a critical driver of market relevance, and a moral imperative for any entity seeking to thrive in our increasingly interconnected world.

What exactly do we mean by “design standards for inclusivity”? It’s more than just accessibility checklists, though those are crucial. It’s a holistic approach that embeds empathy, diversity, and equity into the very fabric of our design processes, from ideation to implementation. It’s about recognizing that our users are not a monolithic block, but a rich tapestry of experiences, abilities, backgrounds, and perspectives.

Beyond the Ramp: The Essence of Inclusive Design

Think of inclusive design not as an afterthought, but as the foundational blueprint for everything we create. It anticipates and accommodates the widest possible range of human diversity. This includes, but is not limited to:

Physical Abilities: Ensuring products, services, and environments are usable by individuals with varying mobilities, visual impairments, hearing impairments, and cognitive differences.
Socioeconomic Backgrounds: Designing solutions that are affordable, accessible, and relevant across different economic strata.
Cultural and Linguistic Diversity: Crafting experiences that resonate with and are understandable by people from different cultural contexts and language proficiencies.
Neurodiversity: Creating environments and interfaces that support individuals with conditions like autism, ADHD, and dyslexia.
Age: Designing for both the young and the elderly, considering their unique needs and capabilities.
Gender Identity and Expression: Ensuring products and services are respectful and inclusive of all gender identities.

The beauty of inclusive design is that it often benefits everyone. A curb cut designed for a wheelchair user also helps a parent with a stroller or a delivery person with a handcart. Closed captions, initially for the hearing impaired, are now widely used in noisy environments or by those learning a new language. This “curb cut effect” is a powerful testament to the ripple benefits of designing with a broad lens, showcasing how inclusive design not only meets a need but often creates broader utility and value.

Case Study: Microsoft’s Xbox Adaptive Controller – Redefining Play

One of the most inspiring examples of inclusive design in recent years is the Microsoft Xbox Adaptive Controller. This groundbreaking device, launched in 2018, was specifically designed for gamers with limited mobility. Instead of forcing players to adapt to a standard controller, Microsoft brought together gamers with disabilities, accessibility advocates, and developers to co-create a solution.

The result is a highly customizable controller that can be integrated with a variety of external inputs, such as joysticks, buttons, and switches, allowing players to tailor their gaming experience to their unique physical needs. This wasn’t just about creating an accessible peripheral; it was about opening up the world of gaming, fostering social connection, and empowering individuals who had previously been excluded. The impact extends beyond just gaming; it set a new benchmark for how large corporations can prioritize and execute truly inclusive product development, demonstrating clear market leadership and enhanced brand reputation.

Case Study: The City of Seattle’s Digital Equity Initiative – Bridging the Digital Divide

Inclusive design isn’t limited to physical products; it’s equally critical in the digital realm. The City of Seattle’s Digital Equity Initiative stands as a testament to this. Recognizing that access to technology and digital literacy are no longer luxuries but fundamental rights, the city launched a comprehensive program to bridge the digital divide.

Their approach was multi-faceted, focusing on:

Affordable Internet Access: Partnering with internet service providers and offering subsidies to low-income households.
Access to Devices: Providing refurbished computers and digital literacy training to underserved communities.
Inclusive Digital Services: Designing city websites and online services with clear language, intuitive navigation, and robust accessibility features, ensuring they are usable by individuals with varying levels of digital proficiency and disabilities.

By intentionally designing for digital inclusivity, Seattle is empowering its residents to access essential services, educational opportunities, and economic pathways that would otherwise be out of reach. This initiative demonstrates that inclusive design is a continuous commitment, not a one-time project, requiring ongoing evaluation and adaptation to meet evolving community needs and avoid the significant social and economic costs of digital exclusion.

Implementing Design Standards for Inclusivity: A Roadmap for Change

So, how can organizations effectively implement design standards for inclusivity? The pathway to becoming truly inclusive requires dedication and a strategic approach:

Embrace Empathy as a Core Value: This is not a checklist item; it’s a cultural shift. Designers, developers, marketers, and leaders must actively seek to understand the diverse experiences of their users. This means conducting user research with diverse populations, engaging with accessibility experts, and fostering a culture of curiosity and respect.
Integrate Inclusivity from the Outset: Don’t bolt on accessibility at the end. Make inclusive design a fundamental consideration from the very first brainstorming session. This means including diverse perspectives in design teams, using inclusive language in documentation, and establishing clear guidelines for accessibility.
Leverage Tools and Technologies: Utilize accessibility checkers, screen readers, and other assistive technologies during the design and development process. These tools can help identify potential barriers and ensure compliance with established standards (e.g., WCAG for web content, ISO standards for product design).
Educate and Train Your Teams: Provide ongoing training for all employees on inclusive design principles and practices. This empowers everyone within the organization to contribute to creating more inclusive products and services, fostering an inclusive work environment that attracts and retains diverse talent.
Seek Feedback Continuously: Establish mechanisms for users with diverse needs to provide feedback. This could involve user testing with individuals with disabilities, creating accessible feedback channels, and actively listening to community input. This iterative process is crucial for continuous improvement.
Measure and Iterate: Track the impact of your inclusive design efforts. Are you reaching a broader audience? Are user satisfaction levels increasing for diverse groups? Is your brand reputation improving? Use data to inform your ongoing design decisions and continuously iterate your solutions, understanding that inclusivity is a journey, not a destination.

The Future is Inclusive: Act Now

The shift towards inclusive design is not merely a trend; it’s an evolutionary step in how we create and innovate. Organizations that embrace these standards will not only unlock vast new markets and foster deeper, more authentic connections with their users, but they will also build more resilient, ethical, and ultimately, more successful enterprises. In a world where diversity is a superpower, the competitive advantage will undeniably belong to those who design for everyone. The time for action is now. Let’s build a future where no one is left behind by design.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Bridging the Digital Divide with Universal Design

Leave a reply

Bridging the Digital Divide with Universal Design

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In an increasingly connected world, the digital divide remains a formidable barrier, preventing equitable access to information and technology. The divide affects individuals across different socioeconomic, geographic, and demographic lines. Bridging this gulf demands intentional approaches that prioritize inclusivity and accessibility, and here is where Universal Design becomes pivotal.

Understanding Universal Design

Universal Design is about creating products and environments accessible to all people, regardless of their abilities, age, or status. It involves designing solutions that are user-friendly and accommodating from the very beginning. This concept not only aids those with disabilities but also enhances usability for everyone. As a proponent of human-centered innovation, I believe Universal Design is crucial in addressing the digital divide.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Microsoft’s Inclusive Design Strategy

Microsoft is a compelling example of leveraging universal design to bridge the digital divide. Their Inclusive Design Strategy emphasizes understanding and addressing the needs of people with disabilities to enhance their products for all users. This was notably apparent with the redesign of the Xbox Adaptive Controller.

The controller was developed to cater not just to gamers with limited mobility but also reflects a broader philosophy: designing for people with disabilities can make products better for everyone. By championing inclusivity, Microsoft opened up opportunities for engagement in gaming for individuals who were previously marginalized.

This strategy has been extended to other products, such as Windows, where features like Narrator, Magnifier, and Speech Recognition are integral parts of the operating system, not afterthoughts.

Case Study 2: Google’s Project Loon

Another notable initiative is Google’s Project Loon, which aims to provide internet access to under-served regions using high-altitude balloons. The project’s primary goal is to connect rural and remote areas to the wider world, thus addressing a significant part of the digital divide.

By accessing these regions with innovative technology, Project Loon is not only supplying internet access but is also facilitating socioeconomic development. Remote farmers, small businesses, and local institutions can connect with larger markets and resources, fostering socioeconomic growth.

Google’s initiative serves as a testament to how technology, when thoughtfully applied, can reach beyond traditional boundaries and create an inclusive digital environment.

The Role of Universal Design in Digital Accessibility

Universal Design plays a transformative role in digital accessibility by considering users at the margins and making inclusive solutions a standard practice. This helps in creating digital experiences that everyone can access, enhancing overall usability.

It calls for a paradigm shift in how we think about design—from focusing on the average user to embracing a wider spectrum of human diversity. This approach not only bridges the digital divide but fosters innovation by creating products that are at the intersection of user needs and technological possibilities.

Conclusion

Bridging the digital divide is an ongoing challenge that requires collaborative efforts and a shift in mindset towards inclusivity and universal accessibility. By adopting Universal Design principles, organizations and innovators can make strides toward not only narrowing this divide but also unlocking opportunities for everyone.

As we move forward, let’s champion innovation that includes everyone, ensuring that no one is left behind in our digital future.

Image credit: Dall-E

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of Inclusive Design in Modern Innovation

Leave a reply

The Role of Inclusive Design in Modern Innovation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the ever-evolving landscape of modern innovation, one guiding principle stands out for its transformative potential: inclusive design. By focusing on creating products and services that are accessible and usable for people with diverse needs and abilities, inclusive design not only fosters greater equity but also drives groundbreaking innovation.

Understanding Inclusive Design

Inclusive design is a methodology that puts people at the heart of the innovation process. It aims to eliminate barriers and ensure that everyone, regardless of their physical, cognitive, or emotional capabilities, can fully engage with products and services. This approach not only broadens the market reach but also spurs creativity by considering a wider range of human experiences and perspectives.

“Inclusive design is designing for everyone. It’s about understanding and solving real-world needs for people who are often marginalized or overlooked.” — Braden Kelley

Case Study 1: Microsoft’s Inclusive Design Toolkit

One exemplary case of inclusive design in action is Microsoft’s development of its Inclusive Design Toolkit. Recognizing the varying abilities of their users, Microsoft embarked on a mission to create more accessible technology. The company’s toolkit provides guidelines and principles that encourage designers to consider people across a wide spectrum of capabilities.

For instance, insights garnered from designing for individuals with disabilities — such as providing voice recognition technologies for people who are blind — led to innovations that have widespread benefits, such as improved virtual assistants and enhanced speech-to-text functionalities. This ripple effect underscores how inclusive design can lead to innovations that benefit not just niche groups but the general public, thereby enhancing overall user experience.

Case Study 2: OXO Good Grips

Another noteworthy example is the OXO Good Grips line of kitchen utensils. The journey began when OXO’s founder, Sam Farber, noticed his wife, who had arthritis, struggling with traditional kitchen tools. This observation led to the design of ergonomic utensils that are easier to hold and use, accommodating both those with grip challenges and those without.

The initial focus on individuals with arthritis expanded to create a product line universally appreciated for its comfort and practicality. The success of OXO Good Grips showcases how addressing specific accessibility challenges can lead to products that cater to a broader demographic, paving the way for commercial success.

The Broader Impact of Inclusive Design

The principles of inclusive design extend far beyond technology and consumer products. They foster an environment where diversity of thought thrives, leading to more robust and versatile innovations. By challenging assumptions and embracing a diverse set of perspectives, organizations can create more adaptive and resilient solutions.

Moreover, inclusive design contributes to social equity. It enables people who might otherwise be excluded to participate more fully in society, whether it’s through digital platforms, public spaces, or everyday products.

Implementing Inclusive Design: Key Strategies

To harness the power of inclusive design, organizations can adopt the following strategies:

Engage Diverse Perspectives: Include individuals from a range of backgrounds and abilities in the design process to surface diverse insights and challenges.
Iterate and Prototype: Regularly test and refine designs with actual users to ensure they meet real-world needs.
Focus on Flexibility: Design solutions that can be customized or adapted to fit different users’ needs.

By adopting these strategies, companies can unlock the full potential of inclusive design, leading to innovations that are not only transformative but also equitable.

Conclusion

In the journey toward creating a more interconnected and compassionate world, inclusive design promises a pathway to both innovation and equity. As businesses, designers, and innovators, our challenge is to embed inclusivity into the fabric of our design processes, expanding the boundaries of what’s possible for every user. This inclusive mindset holds the key to a future where innovation works for all, inspiring progress, understanding, and unity.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration in Inclusive Design

Leave a reply

Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration in Inclusive Design

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s rapidly evolving world, the need for inclusive design is more pressing than ever. Inclusive design ensures that products, environments, and services are accessible and usable by as many people as possible. It is a philosophy that goes beyond accessibility, focusing on user diversity and varying perspectives.

Cross-disciplinary collaboration is pivotal to inclusive design. By involving diverse disciplines, teams can leverage a broad range of insights and expertise to create solutions that are truly inclusive. This approach brings together different viewpoints, fostering an innovative environment where creative solutions can thrive.

Case Study 1: OXO Good Grips

One exemplary model of cross-disciplinary collaboration in inclusive design is OXO’s Good Grips line of kitchen tools. Initially inspired by a need for user-friendly kitchen tools that cater to people with arthritis, OXO’s design team incorporated professionals from various fields such as industrial design, occupational therapy, and market research.

The collaboration began with direct user input and testing, where users with arthritis provided first-hand insights into their struggles with traditional kitchen tools. The occupational therapists in the team translated these struggles into functional requirements, ensuring ease of use and ergonomic comfort.

Industrial designers brought creativity and technical knowledge to the table, developing prototypes and testing materials that were both durable and comfortable. This cross-disciplinary approach led to the creation of Good Grips tools, which feature larger, cushioned handles that are comfortable for all users, not just those with arthritis.

Case Study 2: Microsoft Inclusive Design Toolkit

Microsoft has long been a champion of inclusive design, developing tools and frameworks that guide cross-disciplinary teams in creating accessible technology. A pivotal example is their Inclusive Design Toolkit, which integrates insights from various fields, including psychology, technology, and user research.

The toolkit’s creation involved collaboration between engineers, designers, and psychologists, ensuring a well-rounded understanding of user needs. Psychologists helped identify cognitive and behavioral patterns among diverse user groups, while engineers and designers developed solutions that accommodated these findings.

Through continuous testing and improvement, facilitated by insights from users with disabilities, Microsoft was able to implement features such as adaptive controllers and voice recognition technologies. This cross-disciplinary effort culminated in products that not only serve users with disabilities but enhance the experience for all users.

Conclusion

These case studies underscore the transformative potential of cross-disciplinary collaboration in inclusive design. By merging expertise from different fields, organizations can foster innovation and creativity, ultimately leading to products that embrace user diversity.

As we move forward, it is imperative to continue championing cross-disciplinary collaboration in design processes. Only then can we create a more inclusive world, where every user, regardless of their abilities or background, can participate fully. Let’s commit to embedding inclusion at the heart of innovation, leveraging diverse perspectives to build solutions that empower all.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.