Category Archives: Leadership

AI and Employee Engagement

Improving Productivity and Job Satisfaction

AI and Employee Engagement: Improving Productivity and Job Satisfaction

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s fast-paced work environment, employee engagement plays a crucial role in driving productivity and job satisfaction. With the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, organizations have a unique opportunity to leverage AI tools to enhance employee engagement and create a more productive and fulfilling workplace.

Case Study 1: Chatbots as Virtual Mentors

One innovative way organizations are using AI to improve employee engagement is through the use of virtual chatbots as mentors. These chatbots are programmed to provide guidance, support, and feedback to employees in real time, helping them navigate challenges and develop their skills.

For example, a large tech company implemented a virtual mentor chatbot for its customer service team. The chatbot was programmed to provide on-the-job training, answer questions, and offer personalized feedback based on the employee’s performance. As a result, employees felt more supported and engaged in their roles, leading to an increase in productivity and job satisfaction.

Case Study 2: AI-Driven Performance Management

Another way AI is transforming employee engagement is through AI-driven performance management systems. These systems use algorithms and data analytics to provide real-time insights into employee performance, leading to more personalized feedback and development opportunities.

A leading financial services firm implemented an AI-driven performance management system that analyzed employee data, such as productivity metrics and feedback, to identify areas for improvement and growth. The system then provided targeted feedback and recommendations to help employees enhance their skills and performance.

As a result, employees felt more engaged and empowered to take ownership of their development, leading to higher levels of job satisfaction and productivity across the organization.

Conclusion

AI has the potential to revolutionize employee engagement by providing personalized support, feedback, and development opportunities. By leveraging AI tools like virtual mentors and performance management systems, organizations can create a more engaging and fulfilling workplace that drives productivity and job satisfaction. It is essential for organizations to embrace AI as a tool to enhance employee engagement and create a more productive and successful work environment.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Gamification in the Workplace

Using Game Elements to Boost Engagement and Creativity

Gamification in the Workplace: Using Game Elements to Boost Engagement and Creativity

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In today’s fast-paced and competitive business environment, companies are constantly looking for innovative ways to engage and motivate their employees. One method that has gained popularity in recent years is gamification – the use of game elements and principles in non-game contexts to drive desired behaviors. By incorporating elements such as points, badges, leaderboards, and rewards into everyday tasks and processes, organizations can increase employee engagement, productivity, and creativity.

Case Study 1: Salesforce

One company that has successfully implemented gamification in the workplace is Salesforce. The global customer relationship management software company uses a gamified platform called “Trailhead” to train and motivate its employees. Trailhead allows employees to earn points, badges, and rewards for completing training modules and challenges, creating a sense of accomplishment and friendly competition among teams. As a result, employees are more invested in their learning and development, leading to increased productivity and retention.

Case Study 2: Microsoft

Another example of gamification in the workplace is Microsoft’s “The Ribbon Hero” game. Designed to help employees improve their skills in using Microsoft Office applications, the game challenges players to complete tasks and challenges within the programs, earning points and moving up levels as they progress. By making learning fun and interactive, Microsoft has seen a significant increase in employee engagement and proficiency with their software tools.

Conclusion

Incorporating gamification into the workplace can have numerous benefits for organizations, including increased employee engagement, motivation, and creativity. By tapping into employees’ natural desire for competition, recognition, and achievement, companies can create a more dynamic and fulfilling work environment. As technology continues to advance and the workforce becomes increasingly diverse and digital, gamification will play an essential role in driving innovation and success in the modern workplace.

SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Change Management Needs to Change

Change Management Needs to Change

GUEST POST from Greg Satell

In 1983, McKinsey consultant Julien Phillips published a paper in the journal, Human Resource Management, that described an ‘adoption penalty’ for firms that didn’t adapt to changes in the marketplace quickly enough. His ideas became McKinsey’s first change management model that it sold to clients.

But consider that research shows in 1975, during the period Phillips studied, 83% of the average US corporation’s assets were tangible assets, such as plant, machinery and buildings, while by 2015, 84% of corporate assets were intangible, such as licenses, patents and research. Clearly, that changes how we need to approach transformation.

When your assets are tangible, change is about making strategic decisions, such as building factories, buying new equipment and so on. Yet when your assets are intangible, change is connected to people—what they believe, how they think and how they act. That’s a very different matter and we need to reexamine how we approach transformation and change.

The Persuasion Model Of Change

Phillips’ point of reference for his paper on organizational change was a comparison of two companies, NCR and Burroughs, and how they adapted to changes in their industry between 1960 and 1975. Phillips was able to show that during that time, NCR paid a high price for its inability to adapt to change while it’s competitor, Burroughs prospered.

He then used that example to outline a general four-part model for change:

  • Creating a sense of concern
  • Developing a specific commitment to change
  • Pushing for major change
  • Reinforcing and consolidating the new course

Phillips’ work kicked off a number of similar approaches, the most famous of which is probably Kotter’s 8-step model. Yet despite the variations, the all follow a similar pattern. First you need to create a sense of urgency, then you devise a vision for change, communicate the need for it effectively and convince others to go along.

The fundamental assumption of these models, is that if people understand the change that you seek, they will happily go along. Yet my research indicates exactly the opposite. In fact, it turns out that people don’t like change and will often work actively to undermine it. Merely trying to be more persuasive is unlikely get you very far.

This is even more true when the target of the change is people themselves than when the change involves some sort of strategic asset. That’s probably why more recent research from McKinsey has found that only 26% of organizational transformations succeed.

Shifting From Hierarchies To Networks

Clearly, the types of assets that make up an enterprise aren’t the only thing that has changed over the past half-century. The structure of our organizations has also shifted considerably. The firms of Phillips’ and Kotter’s era were vlargely hierarchical. Strategic decisions were made at the top and carried out by others below.

Yet there is significant evidence that suggests that networks outperform hierarchies. For example, in Regional Advantage AnnaLee Saxenian explains that Boston-based technology firms, such as DEC and Data General, were vertically integrated and bound employees through non-compete contracts. Their Silicon Valley competitors such as Hewlett Packard and Sun Microsystems, on the other hand, embraced open technologies, built alliances and allowed their people to job hop.

The Boston-based companies, which dominated the microcomputer industry, were considered to be very well managed, highly efficient and innovative firms. However, when technology shifted away from microcomputers, their highly stable, vertical-integrated structure was completely cut off from the knowledge they would need to compete. The highly connected Silicon Valley firms, on the other hand, thrived.

Studies have found similar patterns in the German auto industry, among currency traders and even in Broadway plays. Wherever we see significant change today, it tends to happen side-to-side in networks rather than top-down in hierarchies.

Flipping The Model

When Barry Libenson first arrived at Experian as Global CIO in 2015, he knew that the job would be a challenge. As one of the world’s largest data companies, with leading positions in the credit, automotive and healthcare markets, the CIO’s role is especially crucial for driving the business. He was also new to the industry and needed to build a learning curve quickly.

So he devoted his first few months at the firm to looking around, talking to people and taking the measure of the place. “I especially wanted to see what our customers had on their roadmap for the next 12-24 months,” he told me and everywhere he went he heard the same thing. They wanted access to real-time data.

As an experienced CIO, Libenson knew a cloud computing architecture could solve that problem, but concerns that would need to be addressed. First, many insiders had concerns that moving from batched processed credit reports to real-time access would undermine Experian’s business model.. There were concerns about cybersecurity. The move would also necessitate a shift to agile product management, which would be controversial.

As CIO, Libenson had a lot of clout and could have, as traditional change management models suggest, created a “sense of urgency” among his fellow senior executives and then gotten a commitment to the change he sought. After the decision had been made, they then would have been able to design a communication campaign to persuade 16,000 employees that the change was a good one. The evidence suggests that effort would have failed.

Instead, he flipped the model and began working with a small team that was already enthusiastic about the move. He created an “API Center of Excellence” to help willing project managers to learn agile development and launch cloud-enabled products. After about a year, the program had gained significant traction and after three years the transformation to the cloud was complete.

Becoming The Change That You Want To See

The practice of change management got its start because businesses needed to adapt. The shift that Burroughs made to electronics was no small thing. Investments needed to be made in equipment, technology, training, marketing and so on. That required a multi-year commitment. Its competitor, NCR, was unable or unwilling to change and paid a dear price for it.

Yet change today looks much more like Experian’s shift to the cloud than it does Burroughs’ move into electronics. It’s hard, if not impossible, to persuade a product manager to make a shift if she’s convinced it will kill her business model, just it’s hard to get a project manager to adopt agile methodologies if she feels she’s been successful with more traditional methods. .

Libenson succeeded at Experian not because he was more persuasive, but because he had a better plan. Instead of trying to convince everyone at once, he focused his efforts on empowering those that were already enthusiastic. As their efforts became successful, others joined them and the program gathered steam. Those that couldn’t keep up got left behind.

The truth is that today we can’t transform organizations unless we transform the people in them and that’s why change management has got to change. It is no longer enough to simply communicate decisions made at the top. Rather, we need to put people at the center and empower them to succeed.

— Article courtesy of the Digital Tonto blog
— Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Lead Innovation, Don’t Manage It

Lead Innovation, Don't Manage It

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Chief Innovation Officers are growing like weeds. Some think their job is to manage innovation.

Some even go so far as to define their desirable traits.

Here is yet another article on how to manage innovation.

Here are some ideas on what it takes to be an innovation manager.

You can tell the CHINOs (Chief Healthcare Innovation Officer) in your office by the chinos and polo shirts they wear. But, just because they wear the same uniforms doesn’t mean they think and work the same. You see, there is no CHINO school.

They might as well quit since managing innovation will take them in the wrong direction. Instead, they should be leading innovators. Here’s why:

1. Everyone seems to have a different definition of innovation. Be sure you are leading people who have the same understanding and objectives.

2. Managing innovation implies that the core competence of an innovative enterprise is their system or culture. While that is important, successful innovation comes from living, breathing humans who innovate or try to repeatedly despite big obstacles.

3. Managing is about optimizing the efficacy and efficiency or resources. Entrepreneurs or intrapreneurs, some of whom are innovators, pursue opportunity with limited resources with the goal of creating user defined value through the deployment of innovation.

4. Leaderpreneurs are different than managers and have a different role. They provide vision, direction and inspiration. Unfortunately, most “leaders” provide motivation, not inspiration. Here are the differences:

  1. External vs. Internal: The first key difference is while motivation is typically accomplished through external factors, inspiration is an internal force. Wayne Dyer puts it this way: “If motivation is when you get hold of an idea and carry it through to its conclusion, inspiration is the reverse. An idea gets hold of you and carries you where you are intended to go.”
  2. Duration and Effectiveness: Since inspiration is an internal force, it lasts longer and is more effective. Motivation, particularly when connected to a system of external rewards, is only effective as long as you are able to keep the system of rewards consistent. Inspiration has deeper roots; its influence sticks with you and propels you further than mere motivation can.
  3. People’s Responses: People respond to inspirational leadership exponentially better than they do to compensation or coercion. People are always more eager to do something when it is an idea they feel connected to and invested in. While external forces can be a key motivator, people will react far better to a personal investment.

The goal is to release the innerpreneur, not use carrots and sticks.

5. Managing is about preserving or building the status quo. Innovating is about making the status quo obsolete.

6. Managers rarely assume the roles of intrapreneurial sponsors. Leaderpreneurs have to to be successful.

7. Managers get in the way by controlling. Leaderpreneurs get out of the way by inspiring.

8. Leaderpreneurs create innovation management systems that can be scaled with the goal of making themselves obsolete as quickly as possible. Managers create systems to protect their jobs.

9. Leaderpreneurs organize chaos and serendipity. Managers strive to standardize.

10. Managers think short term costs. Innovation leaderpreneurs measure things as longer term investments.

A recently released Conference Board report showed a strong link between leadership and innovation. The authors identified nine behaviors that are key to getting results:

  1. Leaders jointly created a vision with their colleagues.Some have thought leadership to be about coming up with a grand strategy, and then enticing the troops to follow you up the hill. But our data showed leaders creating a vision collaboratively, not in a directive manner.
  2. They build trust. We interviewed leaders who were in the top 1% of their organization on creativity. One quality stood out. These leaders trusted their people and in turn their colleagues had an enormous trust in them. One person noted, “To take a risk demands that you feel really safe.” “She always has our back,” said another.
  3. Innovation champions were characterized by a willingness to constantly challenge the status quo.People described innovative leaders as fearless and doing what’s right versus what may be politically correct. Some highly effective leaders of innovation were characterized as being “inverse to the environment.”
  4. Leaders who fostered innovation were noted for their deep expertise.Colleagues noted that it was this “T” quality that defined these leaders. These leaders had a wide range of intellectual curiosity on a horizontal axis, while at the same time were grounded deeply in their knowledge of the technology at the center of what their group did.
  5. They set high goals. Leaders who created innovative teams were noted for setting the bar extremely high, and giving their colleagues the challenge and opportunity to achieve what they believed would be beyond their reach.
  6. Innovative leaders gravitate toward speed. These leaders move at a quick pace. They believe things can be accomplished sooner, not later. They gravitate toward the quick prototype that is put together with duct tape and paper clips in one day over a more perfect result they could create in six months. The graph below shows 360 results for 57,113 leaders who were rated on their speed of execution and their ability to innovate. Note that leaders who move slowly are on average rated at the 12th percentile on their ability to innovate while those who are in the top 10 percent are at the 89th percentile.
  7. They crave information. Innovative leaders keep the team on the same page by flooding them with relevant facts. They excel at asking good question and then being exceedingly good listeners. The combination of “catch and pitch” helps the team to excel at innovation.
  8. They excel at teamwork. The next characteristic of the most innovative leaders was excelling at teamwork and collaboration. It was never about “me.” It was always about the team creating something of value.
  9. They value diversity and inclusion. The most innovative leaders recognize that the creative process feeds on bringing people together who possess sharply differing views and experience. It is the blending of these elements that creates highly innovative solutions.

Here are five strengths of innovative leaders.

Here are some other thoughts on what it takes to lead innovators.

In general,  successful innovators primarily focus on four areas: creating a vision, building an organization that can achieve that vision, leading and empowering their team to succeed in that, as well as ultimately adapting their approach based on what they’ve learned along the way.

No alt text provided for this image

Here are 10 tips on how to create a lead successful innovation teams.

One author noted that “the first step in creating meaningful, long-term, sustainable innovation in any organization is to recognize that cultures cause outcomes.  And if this is true, bad cultures will cause bad outcomes. And if this is true, it further follows that bad leadership causes bad cultures, which in turn cause bad outcomes.”

Harvard Business School Professor Gary Pisano reminds us , though, that the innovation culture must balance easy to like behaviors with some that are less fun and designed to address the main dysfunctions of teams: an intolerance for incompetence, rigorous discipline, brutal candor, a high level of individual accountability and strong leadership.

There are many myths about organizational innovation cultures and how to create them. The truth is that cultures are the result of innovation strategy, structure, processes and people, not the cause. They are created by organizational leaders.

Another problem is that traditional approaches to leadership development no longer meet the needs of organizations or individuals and personal learning clouds are filling the gaps.

Innovation is not a nebulous concept tucked some where in a strategic plan. Like any combat team, it has a face, a heart and a soul and needs to nurtured and led, not managed. In the end, it’s the people, stupid.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Encouraging a Risk-Taking Mindset in Your Organization

Encouraging a Risk-Taking Mindset in Your Organization

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The rapid pace of change in today’s business environment demands agility and a willingness to take risks. However, fostering a risk-taking mindset in an organization is easier said than done. It requires deliberate strategy, clear communication, and a supportive culture. Here, we’ll explore practical steps to encourage this mindset by examining two case studies from companies that have successfully navigated this transformation.

Case Study 1: 3M

Overview

3M, a global innovation company, is often cited as a model for fostering a risk-taking culture. Known for its wide range of products and significant number of patents, 3M has embedded risk-taking in its corporate DNA.

Actions Taken

  • 15% Rule: 3M encourages its employees to spend 15% of their work time on ideas of their choosing. This policy gives employees the freedom to explore and experiment without the immediate pressure of delivering results.
  • Cross-Functional Teams: By forming cross-functional teams, 3M brings diverse perspectives together, promoting creative solutions and informed risk-taking.
  • Learning from Failure: 3M celebrates both successes and learnings from failures. They hold ‘failure parties’ to dissect what went wrong and how it can be avoided in the future, thereby destigmatizing failure.

Results

3M’s risk-taking culture has led to products like Post-it Notes and Scotch Tape, revolutionizing the stationery market. Their approach demonstrates that calculated risks, backed by support and learning, can lead to groundbreaking innovations.

Case Study 2: Google

Overview

Google, a pioneer in the tech industry, is another example of a company that thrives on a risk-taking ethos. Their rapid expansion into a variety of tech-related fields is a testament to their willingness to venture into the unknown.

Actions Taken

  • Psychological Safety: Google places high importance on creating environments where employees feel safe to take risks. Project Aristotle highlighted psychological safety as a key component of their high-performing teams.
  • Dedicated Innovation Labs: Google runs innovation labs like X (formerly Google X), which are dedicated to ‘moonshot’ projects with high risk and high reward.
  • Clear Metrics: For each experimental project, Google sets clear milestones and metrics, allowing for informed go/no-go decisions rather than arbitrary cuts based on gut feeling.

Results

Google’s approach to risk-taking has birthed revolutionary products like Google Search, Gmail, and self-driving car technology. By emphasizing psychological safety and creating dedicated spaces for risk, Google continues to lead in innovation.

Key Takeaways

From these case studies, we can extract several key practices that any organization can implement to foster a risk-taking mindset:

  • Encourage Time for Exploration: Allocate time for employees to work on passion projects and explore new ideas.
  • Promote Cross-Functional Collaboration: Bring together diverse teams to fuel innovative thinking.
  • Create a Safe Environment for Failure: Celebrate learnings from failures to reduce the stigma and fear associated with taking risks.
  • Set Clear Metrics and Milestones: Provide clarity on what success looks like to make informed decisions.
  • Support from Leadership: Ensure that leaders actively support and model risk-taking behavior.

By embedding these practices into the fabric of your organization, you can create a dynamic environment where innovation thrives, and calculated risks lead to transformative successes.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Cultivating a Growth Mindset Among Your Team

Cultivating a Growth Mindset Among Your Team

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s ever-evolving business landscape, the ability of a team to embrace challenges, learn from setbacks, and continuously strive for improvement is paramount. This adaptability is rooted in what psychologists Carol Dweck and her colleagues have termed the “growth mindset.” It’s characterized by the belief that abilities and intelligence can be developed through dedication, hard work, and the right strategies. This article delves into the principles of fostering a growth mindset within your team and presents two real-world case studies that illustrate its transformative power.

Principles of a Growth Mindset

  • Embrace Challenges: Encourage your team to step out of their comfort zones and tackle difficult projects.
  • Learn from Criticism: Constructive feedback should be seen as a tool for improvement rather than a personal attack.
  • Persistence: Promote perseverance, even when tasks become tough, and celebrate small victories along the way.
  • Effort is Essential: Recognize hard work and effort as pathways to mastering new skills and achieving goals.
  • Celebrate Growth: Acknowledge progress and development, not just end results.

The Roadmap to Cultivating Growth Mindset

Implementing a growth mindset culture requires consistent effort and intention. Start by exemplifying the mindset yourself and follow through with coaching, training, and an environment that allows for experimentation and constructive failure.

Case Study 1: XYZ Tech Innovators

Background: XYZ Tech Innovators was a startup struggling with high employee turnover and stalling project deadlines. The leadership team identified a fixed mindset culture as the core issue.

Approach: The company implemented a series of workshops focused on the principles of a growth mindset. Managers were trained to deliver constructive feedback focused on effort and strategies rather than innate talent. The company also encouraged employees to set personal growth goals and paired them with mentors.

Outcome: The initiative transformed the workplace environment. Employees started taking on more ambitious projects, and team collaboration improved. Within a year, employee turnover decreased by 30%, and project completion rates soared by 50%.

Case Study 2: ABC Retail Group

Background: ABC Retail Group was facing stagnation in innovation and product development. Team members were hesitant to pitch new ideas, fearing failure and criticism.

Approach: To shift the cultural mindset, ABC Retail Group introduced an “Innovation Lab” where employees could experiment with new ideas without the pressure of immediate success. The lab was a failure-tolerant environment where learning from mistakes was encouraged and expected.

Outcome: Within six months, the lab produced several viable new products. Team members reported feeling more creative and less anxious about proposing ideas. The company’s innovation index, a measure of new product success, increased by 40% in the following year.

Conclusion

Instilling a growth mindset within your team is a dynamic and rewarding process. As evidenced by these case studies, the benefits extend beyond individual performance improvements to foster a culture of continuous learning, innovation, and resilience. By embracing the core principles of a growth mindset, your team can navigate challenges more effectively and unlock unprecedented levels of success.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

CEOs Say Creativity is the Most Critical Factor for Future Success

CEOs Say Creativity is the Most Critical Factor for Future Success

GUEST POST from Linda Naiman

According to the IBM 2010 Global CEO Study, which surveyed 1,500 Chief Executive Officers from 60 countries and 33 industries worldwide, CEOs believe that,

“More than rigor, management discipline, integrity or even vision — successfully navigating an increasing complex world will require creativity.”

IBM CEO Study: Creative Leadership

CEOs say creativity helps them capitalise on complexity

“The effects of rising complexity calls for CEOs and their teams to lead with bold creativity, connect with customers in imaginative ways and design their operations for speed and flexibility to position their organisations for twenty-first century success.”

Amen to that! If we are going to find solutions in a world that is becoming increasingly interconnected and complex, we cannot rely on traditional ways of leading and managing.

Creativity is the most important leadership quality

Facing a world becoming dramatically more complex, it is interesting that CEOs selected creativity as the most important leadership attribute. Creative leaders invite disruptive innovation, encourage others to drop outdated approaches and take balanced risks. They are open-minded and inventive in expanding their management and communication styles, particularly to engage with a new generation of employees, partners and customers.

High-performing CEOs practice and encourage experimentation and innovation throughout their organisations. Creative leaders expect to make deeper business model changes to realise their strategies. To succeed, they take more calculated risks, find new ideas and keep innovating in how they lead and communicate.

The most successful organisations co-create products and services with customers, and integrate customers into core processes.

They are adopting new channels to engage and stay in tune with customers. By drawing more insight from the available data, successful CEOs make customer intimacy their number one priority.

95 percent of top performing organizations identified getting closer to customers as their most important strategic initiative over the next five years – using Web, interactive, and social media channels to rethink how they engage with customers and citizens. They view the historic explosion of information and global information flows as opportunities, rather than threats.

Better performers manage complexity on behalf of their organisations, customers and partners.

They do so by simplifying operations and products, and increasing dexterity to change the way they work, access resources and enter markets around the world. Compared to other CEOs, dexterous leaders expect 20 percent more future revenue to come from new sources. 54 percent of CEOs from top performing companies indicated they are learning to respond swiftly with new ideas to address the deep changes affecting their organizations.

Source:

IBM 2010 Global CEO Study: Creativity Selected as Most Crucial Factor for Future Success — May 18, 2010

My reflection

As a practitioner in the world of business creativity and innovation over the past twenty years, I am heartened by this encouraging news. We’ve all been tracking the success of innovators at companies like Google and Apple, and now it looks like a second wave of creativity and innovation is penetrating C-level leadership. We truly have entered the Age of Creativity.

Whole Brain Creativity

Develop creative leadership in your business:

  • Discover your Creativity and Innovation styles
  • Leverage the four intelligences of creative thinking in your team
  • Develop a language and structure for managing the creative process
  • Create a climate conductive to fostering creativity and innovation
  • Design and conduct high-performance idea-generation/problem-solving sessions
  • Recognize when and how creativity is stifled and be able to prevent this
  • Build innovation and critical thinking into individual and teamwork processes.

Image credits: Pixabay and Linda Naiman

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Overcoming Change Resistance

Addressing Common Barriers to Change

Overcoming Change Resistance

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Change is the only constant in today’s fast-paced world. Despite this, organizations often encounter significant resistance to change from their employees. As a change and innovation thought leader, my aim is to provide actionable insights to navigate these barriers effectively. In this article, we will delve into the common barriers to change and present real-world case studies to illuminate practical solutions.

Understanding the Common Barriers to Change

Resistance to change is natural. It often stems from fear of the unknown, loss of control, bad timing, or previously unsuccessful change initiatives. By recognizing these barriers early, leaders can strategize on how to address them effectively.

Case Study 1: Transforming a Legacy Retail Company

Background: A well-established retail company with a legacy of over 70 years in the industry was facing declining sales due to increased competition and a shift towards e-commerce. They decided to undergo a digital transformation to stay relevant.

Challenges: The employees were resistant to change as they were comfortable with traditional business processes. There was a significant apprehension regarding the adoption of new technology.

Approach: The leadership team implemented a change management strategy focusing on communication, training, and involvement. They organized town hall meetings to explain the vision and benefits of digital transformation. Training programs were launched to upskill employees in new technologies, and an innovation lab was created, encouraging employees to contribute ideas and test new digital tools.

Outcome: The combination of transparent communication, ongoing training, and employee involvement helped in reducing fear and building a sense of ownership among the staff. Eventually, the company saw a successful transformation with a significant increase in online sales and improved overall efficiency.

Case Study 2: Revamping the Organizational Culture of a Manufacturing Firm

Background: A mid-sized manufacturing firm recognized the need to shift from a hierarchical culture to a more collaborative and innovative work environment in order to drive growth and improve employee satisfaction.

Challenges: Long-standing employees were resistant to this cultural shift, worrying about the loss of status and changes in their work roles.

Approach: The firm’s leadership took a phased approach, starting with the creation of cross-functional teams for specific projects. They encouraged open communication and feedback through regular workshops and surveys. Leadership also modeled collaborative behavior and rewarded teams for innovative solutions.

Outcome: Gradually, employees began to see the positive impact of a collaborative culture on their productivity and job satisfaction. As trust was built and employees felt more valued, resistance decreased. The firm reported an increase in innovation and employee engagement, which translated into business growth.

Key Takeaways

These case studies underscore the importance of addressing resistance to change through clear communication, active involvement, and ongoing support. By understanding and mitigating the emotional and practical concerns of employees, organizations can facilitate smoother transitions and foster a culture of continuous improvement.

Embrace change as a journey rather than a destination, and remember—empathy, patience, and perseverance are your allies in making lasting transformations.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Introduction to Agile: Principles and Practices

Introduction to Agile: Principles and Practices

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

What is Agile?

Agile is not just a methodology, but a holistic approach to project management and software development. It emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and rapid iteration. The core of Agile lies in its set of principles and practices designed to advance productivity and responsiveness to changing customer needs.

The Core Principles of Agile

  1. Customer Satisfaction through Early and Continuous Delivery: Deliver valuable software frequently, with a preference for shorter timescales.
  2. Welcome Changing Requirements: Even late in the development process, Agile processes harness change for the customer’s competitive advantage.
  3. Deliver Working Software Frequently: Prefer shorter timescales from a couple of weeks to a couple of months.
  4. Collaborate Daily with Business People and Developers: Ensure a close, daily cooperation between business stakeholders and developers.
  5. Build Projects around Motivated Individuals: Provide support and trust to the team, allowing them to get the job done.
  6. Face-to-Face Conversation: The most efficient method of conveying information to and within a development team is direct communication.
  7. Working Software is the Primary Measure of Progress: Focus on functional software to gauge how well the project is advancing.
  8. Maintain a Sustainable Pace: Agile processes promote sustainable development — the team should maintain a constant pace indefinitely.
  9. Continuous Attention to Technical Excellence: Enhances agility by focusing on good design and technical details.
  10. Simplicity is Essential: Maximize the amount of work not done, which is important.
  11. Self-Organizing Teams: The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams.
  12. Regular Reflection and Adjustment: Periodically, the team reflects on how to become more effective and adjusts their behavior accordingly.

Case Study 1: Pixar’s Agile Film Making

Many might be familiar with Agile in software development, but Pixar, a leading animation studio, has effectively applied Agile principles in film making. Pixar’s process is not linear. Instead, they iterate on pieces of the film, from storyboarding to final animation, with constant feedback loops.

One key Agile principle Pixar uses is “early and continuous delivery of valuable increments.” This is evident where they focus on delivering short, rough sequences of the film for team and stakeholder review. These rough animations, or ‘reels,’ are iterated upon until the final movie emerges. Pixar also promotes a culture where it’s safe to fail early, as their focus is on rapid prototyping and feedback cycles.

Case Study 2: Spotify and Agile Scaling

Spotify, the global music streaming service, provides a stunning showcase of scaling Agile. Instead of traditional teams, Spotify uses “squads” — small, cross-functional, and self-organizing teams. Each squad operates much like a mini-startup, with accountability for a particular aspect of the service.

Spotify has scaled Agile by structuring squads into Tribes, which work on related areas of the service, allowing for collaboration and alignment. Governance is decentralized, and autonomy is high, which aligns with the Agile principle of self-organizing teams. Another critical aspect is Spotify’s use of “guilds” — groups of individuals with shared interests spanning across different squads, facilitating knowledge sharing and continuous improvement across the organization.

Agile Practices to Implement

Below are several Agile practices to consider implementing in your organization:

  • User Stories: Captures requirements from the perspective of the end-user.
  • Sprint Planning: Prioritize and plan work in time-boxed iterations.
  • Daily Stand-ups: Short, focused meetings to synchronize the team and address obstacles.
  • Sprint Reviews: Demonstrate and inspect the product after each iteration.
  • Retrospectives: Reflect on the process to identify improvements.
  • Kanban Boards: Visualize workflow and limit work in progress to optimize efficiency.

Conclusion

The adoption of Agile introduces a paradigm shift in how teams approach project management and execution. By embracing its principles and practices, organizations can enhance flexibility, foster innovation, and better respond to evolving customer needs. The case studies of Pixar and Spotify illustrate the versatile application of Agile across different domains, highlighting its potential to drive success whether in film making or global software services.

SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Innovation Leader’s Playbook

Key Skills and Strategies

The Innovation Leader's Playbook

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In a world where change is the only constant, the role of the innovation leader has never been more critical. As organizations navigate an ever-evolving landscape of technology, consumer behavior, and market dynamics, the need for visionary leaders capable of steering innovation is paramount. This article delves into the essential skills and strategies every innovation leader should master, while highlighting case studies of successful innovation leadership in action.

Key Skills Every Innovation Leader Should Have

1. Visionary Thinking

Innovation leaders must possess the ability to envision the future and identify opportunities for transformative change. This requires a blend of creative thinking and strategic foresight to map out a path forward that breaks new ground.

2. Empathy

Understanding the needs, desires, and pain points of customers and team members is crucial. Empathy enables leaders to design solutions that truly resonate with users and create a culture where team members feel valued and understood.

3. Collaboration and Inclusivity

Great innovation rarely happens in isolation. Effective leaders foster a collaborative environment where diverse ideas can flourish. Inclusivity ensures that a broad range of perspectives are considered, leading to more robust and innovative solutions.

4. Risk Management

Innovation inherently involves risk. Successful innovation leaders are adept at balancing the need for risk-taking with prudent risk management. They create frameworks that allow for experimentation while safeguarding the organization’s core interests.

5. Adaptability

Adaptability is the ability to pivot strategies and approaches in response to changing conditions. Agile innovation leaders embrace flexibility, using iterative processes to refine their initiatives continuously.

Strategies for Leading Successful Innovation

1. Cultivating a Culture of Innovation

Creating an environment where innovation thrives is foundational. This involves empowering employees to experiment, encouraging cross-functional collaboration, and recognizing and rewarding innovative ideas.

2. Leveraging Technology and Data

Technology and data analytics can unearth insights and streamline processes. Leaders should harness advanced tools, from AI to big data, to drive decision-making and automate routine tasks, freeing up creative resources.

3. Strategic Partnerships

Partnering with external organizations, startups, or academic institutions can bring fresh perspectives and capabilities. Strategic alliances can accelerate innovation efforts and open up new avenues for growth.

4. Agile Methodologies

Adopting agile methodologies allows for iterative development and rapid prototyping. This enables teams to test ideas quickly, gather feedback, and make necessary adjustments in real time.

5. Continuous Learning and Development

Encouraging and providing opportunities for continuous learning ensures that team members are always up-to-date with the latest trends, tools, and best practices. Training programs, workshops, and conferences can be valuable investments.

Case Study 1: Tesla’s Electric Vision

At Tesla, innovation is a core component of the company’s DNA, driven by the visionary leadership of Elon Musk. Tesla’s mission to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy has resulted in groundbreaking advancements in electric vehicles, energy storage, and solar technology.

One key strategy employed by Musk is a relentless focus on long-term vision. Despite numerous challenges, including production bottlenecks and financial strain, Musk’s unwavering commitment to sustainable innovation has rallied the organization and captivated investors.

Additionally, Tesla has leveraged cutting-edge technology and data analytics to inform its design and manufacturing processes. For instance, the company’s use of over-the-air updates continually improves vehicle performance and user experience, keeping Tesla at the forefront of automotive innovation.

Case Study 2: LEGO’s Creative Rebirth

LEGO faced a severe crisis in the early 2000s. The iconic toy manufacturer was on the brink of bankruptcy due to overexpansion and a fragmented product line. The turnaround began with the appointment of Jørgen Vig Knudstorp as CEO, who embraced a culture of innovation to revive the brand.

One of Knudstorp’s pivotal strategies was the introduction of the “LEGO Ideas” platform, which crowdsources ideas from fans. This initiative not only generated a plethora of new product concepts but also deepened customer engagement and loyalty.

LEGO also focused on strategic partnerships, such as the collaboration with movie franchises like Star Wars and Harry Potter. These alliances expanded LEGO’s market reach and introduced the brand to new audiences.

By fostering a culture of collaboration, encouraging customer-driven innovation, and strategically leveraging partnerships, LEGO managed to reverse its fortunes, becoming one of the most beloved and profitable toy brands globally.

Conclusion

Innovation leadership is a multifaceted challenge that requires a combination of visionary thinking, empathy, collaboration, risk management, and adaptability. By cultivating a culture of innovation, leveraging technology, forming strategic partnerships, employing agile methodologies, and committing to continuous learning, leaders can navigate their organizations through the complexities of modern markets.

The case studies of Tesla and LEGO illustrate how these principles can be put into action effectively. The Innovation Leader’s Playbook is not just a guide for achieving success but a roadmap for creating a sustainable and dynamic future. As we move forward, the capacity to innovate will define the difference between organizations that thrive and those that merely survive.

SPECIAL BONUS: The very best change planners use a visual, collaborative approach to create their deliverables. A methodology and tools like those in Change Planning Toolkit™ can empower anyone to become great change planners themselves.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.