Tag Archives: empathy

Are Innovation and Empathy in the Cards?

As part of the leadership team for a new human-centered problem-solving offering for select Oracle customers, I’m always on the lookout for new tools to integrate into our flexible problem-solving process to help clients innovate, grow or transform.

Because our dynamic team of experienced professionals has a diverse range of knowledge, skills and abilities we’re able to co-create solutions to a wide range of business challenges and leverage a wide variety of tools. This means I’m always on the lookout for new tools to better serve our clients, in addition to pursuing my hobby of creating new tools and methodologies in my spare time throughout my career.

My passion for empowering others to succeed in overcoming their business challenges has led to the publishing of two business best-sellers Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire (John Wiley & Sons, 2010) and Charting Change (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), and the creation of the powerful, visual and collaborative Change Planning Toolkit™, my Nine Innovation Roles™ card deck, and the Human-Centered Innovation Toolkit™ (featuring tools like The Experiment Canvas™).

I create new tools, methodologies and frameworks when I see opportunities to make people more efficient and effective in their jobs and leverage the work of others when I find others have created good solutions. I leverage the Business Model Canvas for business model prototyping, I leverage The Play-to-Win Strategy Canvas v3.0 to help people work through strategic choices, along with other tools when the challenge is appropriate.

Recently I have been looking at a variety of card decks to evaluate their suitability to use alongside design thinking and other methodologies that form the basis of the Oracle FUEL approach.

Here are a few I’ve been evaluating lately:

1. Killer Questions – Volume 1 from Phil McKinney, author of Beyond the Obvious and CEO of CableLabs
(More info at https://innovation.tools/)

Brainstorming is a fairly useless exercise the way that most people facilitate it. There are much more effective ways to get ideas and most of the approaches that work better share at their core a more targeted and collaborative approach. The Killer Questions card deck is composed of just that, a collection of questions if left unanswered or unexplored, could lead to blind spots and disruption opportunities for new entrants (or your competition). The questions are categorized into three types:

Who
What
How

And the questions include things like:

Who does not use my product because of my assumptions about their skill or ability
What emotional, psychological, or status benefits could people derive from using my product?
How could users avoid interacting with my product or service but still get the same value?

But the cards don’t just contain a single question. These are examples of guiding questions on the front of a few cards, but on the back of each card you will also find 3-5 supporting questions to help your team explore the guiding question more fully.

Overall, I consider the cards a useful tool for groups including: product teams wanting to continuously stretch themselves as they revaluate product direction, or for expanded innovation teams looking to broaden their search horizons.

2. The Innovation Deck by Andrey Schukin, CTO at Interprefy AG
(More info at http://www.innovationfast.com/)

Where the Killer Questions deck is organized around questions, The Innovation Deck is organized around topics/tactics and triggers. For each topic/tactic there is either a set of instructions or a set of questions.

The Innovation Deck is composed of three different types of cards that will help you:

Examine
Explore
Evaluate

Examine Card example:

EMOTION

People don’t buy things they need. They buy things they want.
How do you make sure that the product will trigger an emotional response from the customer?
What elements of your product will make the customer want to use it?

I would almost include the triggers cards as a fourth card type, because instead of a topic and questions the cards have a collection of words to see if any of the words inspire thought or conversations rather than giving people a guiding topic or tactic.

Overall, I consider these cards as a useful tool for product teams looking at a product to challenge or stretch the existing product direction for the future.

3. Nine Innovation Roles – a card deck by Braden Kelley, author of Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire
(More info at http://9roles.com)

The following is an excerpt from my book that explains some of the thinking behind The Nine Innovation Roles™:

“Too often we treat people as commodities that are interchangeable and maintain the same characteristics and aptitudes. Of course, we know that people are not interchangeable, yet we continually pretend that they are anyway — to make life simpler for our reptile brain to comprehend. Deep down we know that people have different passions, skills, and potential, but even when it comes to innovation, we expect everybody to have good ideas.

I’m of the opinion that all people are creative, in their own way. That is not to say that all people are creative in the sense that every single person is good at creating lots of really great ideas, nor do they have to be. I believe instead that everyone has a dominant innovation role at which they excel, and that when properly identified and channeled, the organization stands to maximize its innovation capacity. I believe that all people excel at one of nine innovation roles, and that when organizations put the right people in the right innovation roles, that your innovation speed and capacity will increase.”

The Nine Innovation Roles™ are:

Revolutionary
Conscript
Connector
Artist
Customer Champion
Troubleshooter
Judge
Magic Maker
Evangelist

To make my Nine Innovation Roles™ framework accessible to as many people as possible inside organizations all around the world to explore and improve innovation team dynamics and success, I am happy to announce that I have now made the print-ready files for the cards available here for FREE download, and you can either work with the vendor I use – adMagic – or work with a local printer in your part of the world.

4. LPK Roadblocks by LPK, a brand and innovation consultancy
(More info at https://roadblocks.lpklab.com/)

The LPK Roadblocks deck is focused on innovation roadblocks and helping organizations whose innovation efforts might have stalled, get unstuck. There are six kinds of cards in the deck:

Voting cards
Question cards
Create Your Own Roadblock cards
Organization Roadblocks
Project Roadblocks
Idea Roadblocks

There are two main ways to use the cards, with selection and voting integrated into both:

Root Cause Discovery
Beginning, Middle and End

Organization Roadblocks include things like “Unrealistic Revenue Hurdles” and “Lip-Service Leadership,” while Project Roadblocks including things like “Untested Assumptions” and “Unclear Objectives”, while Idea Roadblocks include things like “Risk/Reward Imbalance” and “No Route to Market.”

Overall, I find these cards to be a useful tool when you run into a client that says they are struggling to innovate or that they’re not innovating as much as they’d like.

5. Questions & Empathy – a card deck by SubRosa, a brand strategy and design practice
(More info at https://www.questionsandempathy.com/)

SubRosa’s Questions & Empathy cards are composed of seven empathy archetype cards and a set of exploratory questions for each archetype. The seven archetypes are:

Sage
Inquirer
Convener
Alchemist
Confidant
Seeker
Cultivator

Overall, I find these cards to be a useful tool for better understanding yourself and your own empathetic style and over time they could help you approach empathy from more angles than you would without them, but I struggle to see as is how they can actually help you practice applied empathy. The archetypes are useful, but I think I might create my own question cards to help my team better apply empathy within the empathize/understand phase of design thinking.

Conclusion

Whether you’re trying to innovate or just to build up your empathy muscles, I hope you see that there are some great, extremely portable resources to help with either. Of course, there are other card decks out there, but these will give you a few to explore and see whether there is a fit for your design thinking or innovation undertakings. If you’re pursuing a digital transformation or business transformation you can:

If you missed the links to the cards decks above, here they are again:

Killer Questions – Volume 1
The Innovation Deck
Nine Innovation Roles (English/Spanish/Swedish)
LPK Roadblocks
Questions & Empathy

Accelerate your change and transformation success

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of Empathy in Human-Centered Design

Leave a reply

The Role of Empathy in Human-Centered Design

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The concept of empathy has gained traction in recent years. Empathy is typically defined as the capacity to understand or feel what another person is experiencing and to share their feelings. In the design world, empathy is often heralded as the one tool that can help create truly human-centered designs. This article looks at the role of empathy in the context of human-centered design (HCD) and provides case study examples of companies that have successfully leveraged empathy to design user experiences that truly resonated with their users.

The concept of HCD is built on understanding the user on a deeper level. It is more than just understanding a user’s demographic characteristics or their technical needs. HCD seeks to understand the user’s emotions, their values, and their aspirations. It is an approach that seeks to craft user experiences that are not only practical, but also emotionally rewarding. Empathy is the key tool for unlocking the potential of HCD.

At its heart, empathy is about understanding and caring deeply for users and their experiences. Designers must be willing to go beyond just understanding the technical requirements of a user and instead strive to understand the value they add to their lives. To effectively leverage empathy for HCD, designers must have an understanding of the user that goes beyond just demographics or data points. They must be willing to dive deep into the holistic user experience – from their beliefs to their motivations, their joys and their fears – and create designs that acknowledge all these different facets of a user.

Empathy can be used to create experiences that are tailored to the individual user. Just as different users have different needs and values, different designs can be crafted to address different users’ needs and aspirations. Through this approach, designers can create experiences that are truly tailored to each individual user, and this is the heart of HCD.

To better illustrate how empathy can be used to create human-centered designs, here are two case study examples:

Case Study 1 – Airbnb

Airbnb’s success is largely attributed to its ability to create user experiences that are both practical and emotionally engaging. Through their empathy-driven approach, they have created a platform that deeply connects users with each other and allows for personalized experiences. For example, Airbnb’s “Experience” service provides users the opportunity to explore the cities they visit with unique experiences tailored to their individual interests.

Case Study 2 – Apple

Apple is a company that understands the importance of empathy in design. Their products have long been known for their user-friendly interfaces and thoughtful user experience design. Through their empathy-driven design approach, they have crafted products that are so intuitive to use that they have become a household name.

These case studies demonstrate how the use of empathy in design can result in user experiences that users truly love. By taking the time to understand and honor the individual user, designers can create designs that truly resonate with their users.

Conclusion

Empathy is a powerful tool for design that can be used to create user experiences that are both practical and emotionally rewarding. It is the key to unlocking the potential of human-centered design, and companies such as Airbnb and Apple have demonstrated the immense potential of empathy for creating truly user-centric experiences.

SPECIAL BONUS: Braden Kelley’s Problem Finding Canvas can be a super useful starting point for doing design thinking or human-centered design.

“The Problem Finding Canvas should help you investigate a handful of areas to explore, choose the one most important to you, extract all of the potential challenges and opportunities and choose one to prioritize.”

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Measuring Competencies Like Empathy and Collaboration

Leave a reply

Certifying Soft Skills

Measuring Competencies Like Empathy and Collaboration

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
LAST UPDATED: January 19, 2026 at 12:29PM

For decades, the corporate world has operated on a convenient fiction: that “hard skills” — coding, accounting, engineering — are the solid bedrock of business, while “soft skills” are the fuzzy, unenforceable garnishes. We hire for the hard, and we fire for the lack of the soft.

As we navigate an era defined by rapid technological disruption and the rise of Artificial Intelligence, this distinction is not just obsolete; it is dangerous. When machines can crunch numbers faster and generate code cleaner than any human, the true differentiator for an organization — the engine of sustainable innovation and successful change management — becomes the intensely human capacity to connect, understand, and co-create.

The problem has never been that organizations don’t value empathy or collaboration. The problem is that they haven’t known how to measure them with rigor. If we cannot measure it, we cannot manage it, and we certainly cannot certify it. To build truly human-centered organizations, we must crack the code on credentialing the very competencies that make us human.

“We are entering an age where your technical expertise gets you in the room, but your ability to empathize and collaborate determines your impact once you are there. Innovation is a social endeavor; if we can’t measure the quality of our connection, we can’t improve the quality of our creation.”

— Braden Kelley

Moving Beyond the “Vibe Check”

The historical skepticism toward certifying soft skills stems from a reliance on self-assessment. Asking an employee, “How empathetic are you on a scale of 1 to 10?” is useless data. True measurement requires moving from sentiment to demonstrated behavior in context.

We must shift our focus from assessing internal states (how someone feels) to external applications (what someone does with those feelings to drive valuable outcomes). A certification in empathy, for example, shouldn’t signify that a person is “nice.” It should signify that they possess a verified toolkit for uncovering latent user needs and the emotional intelligence to navigate complex stakeholder resistance during change initiatives.

Case Study 1: The “Applied Empathy” Badge in Service Design

The Challenge

A prominent financial services firm found that its digital transformation efforts were stalling. Their product teams were technically proficient but were building solutions based on assumptions rather than user realities, leading to poor adoption rates. They needed to embed deep user understanding into their development lifecycle.

The Measurement Solution

Instead of a generic communications workshop, the firm worked to develop an “Applied Empathy Practitioner” certification. To earn this, candidates had to pass a rigorous, multi-stage evaluation:

Scenario-Based Simulation: Candidates engaged in role-play scenarios with “difficult customers,” evaluated not on appeasement, but on their ability to use active inquiry to uncover the root cause of frustration.
Portfolio of Evidence: Candidates had to submit documented examples of how an insight gained through empathetic interviewing directly altered a product roadmap or service feature. They had to prove the application of the skill.

The Outcome

The certification became a prerequisite for lead design roles. The company saw a 40% reduction in post-launch rework because consumer friction points were identified earlier. They moved empathy from a “nice-to-have” trait to a measurable, certifiable professional competency linked to reduced risk.

Case Study 2: Certifying Collaboration in a Siloed Tech Giant

The Challenge

A global software enterprise was struggling with innovation velocity. While individual departments were high-performing, cross-functional projects frequently died on the vine due to territorialism and a lack of psychological safety. They needed leaders who could act as bridges, not gatekeepers.

The Measurement Solution

The organization realized that certifying collaboration couldn’t be based on a multiple-choice test. They developed a “Master Collaborator” credential focused on network dynamics and team environment:

Organizational Network Analysis (ONA): Instead of just asking “Are you a team player?”, the company used anonymized metadata to map communication flows. They identified individuals who served as high-trust connectors between disparate groups.
360-Degree “Safety” Index: Peers and subordinates evaluated candidates specifically on their ability to create psychological safety—the environment where people feel safe to take risks and voice dissenting opinions without fear of retribution.

The Outcome

Leaders who achieved this certification were placed in charge of critical, high-risk innovation initiatives. The data showed that teams led by certified collaborators brought new products to market 25% faster, primarily because information flowed freely and failures were treated as learning opportunities rather than punishable offenses.

“In the symphony of innovation, empathy isn’t just a note — it’s the harmony that binds the orchestra together, allowing every voice to resonate.”

— Braden Kelley

Case Study 3: Google’s Project Oxygen

Google, a pioneer in data-driven decision-making, launched Project Oxygen in 2008 to identify what makes a great manager. Through extensive analysis of over 10,000 performance reviews, feedback surveys, and interviews, they discovered that technical skills ranked eighth on the list of top behaviors. Instead, top managers excelled in coaching, empowering teams, and showing genuine concern for team members’ success and well-being — hallmarks of empathy.

To certify these competencies, Google developed comprehensive training programs and certification pathways
integrated into their leadership development. Managers undergo rigorous assessments, including peer reviews, self-evaluations, and behavioral interviews focused on specific actions like “is a good coach” and “has a clear vision and strategy for the team.” Successful participants earn internal certifications that directly influence promotions, compensation, and leadership opportunities.

The impact has been profound. Teams led by certified managers report higher satisfaction scores, lower attrition rates, and up to 20% better performance metrics in areas like project delivery and innovation output. This case study illustrates how quantifying soft skills through structured, data-backed feedback can translate into measurable business outcomes, proving that empathy isn’t just nice — it’s a competitive advantage.

Case Study 4: IBM’s Digital Badge Program

IBM has been at the forefront of skills certification with their open badges initiative, launched in 2015. This program extends beyond technical proficiencies to include soft skills like collaboration, agility, and empathy. For instance, to earn a “Collaborative Innovator” badge, employees must complete real-world projects involving cross-functional teams, submit detailed evidence of their contributions, and receive endorsements from at least three peers or supervisors.

A particularly compelling application was during IBM’s transition to hybrid work models following the global pandemic. Employees pursuing certification participated in immersive virtual reality simulations where they navigated complex team conflicts, such as resolving disagreements in diverse groups. These scenarios tested empathy through active listening exercises, inclusive decision-making, and emotional support simulations. Performance is evaluated using AI analytics that score interactions based on predefined empathy and collaboration rubrics.

Badges are issued on a blockchain platform, ensuring they are secure, verifiable, and portable across careers. Data from IBM indicates that employees with soft skill badges are 15% more likely to be promoted internally and report 25% higher job satisfaction levels. Moreover, teams with a higher density of certified collaborators exhibit faster problem-solving times and more innovative patent filings. IBM’s model showcases how blending technology with human-centric evaluation can standardize soft skill certification while preserving the authenticity of interpersonal dynamics.

The Future of Human-Centered Credentialing

Certifying these skills is not about creating a new layer of bureaucracy. It is about signaling value. By creating rigorous standards for empathy, collaboration, adaptability, and resilience, we provide a roadmap for employees to develop the skills that actually matter in a volatile future.

These certifications cannot be “one-and-done.” Just as technical certifications require renewal, soft skill credentials must be dynamic, requiring ongoing evidence of application in increasingly complex scenarios. This ensures that the skills are living capabilities, not just framed certificates.

As leaders in human-centered change, we must champion the idea that the “hardest” skills to master — and the most valuable to measure — are the ones that connect us.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is it difficult to measure soft skills like empathy?

Soft skills are inherently subjective and context-dependent. Unlike technical skills which have binary outcomes (the code works or it doesn’t), soft skills like empathy rely on behavioral indicators, the perception of others, and the ability to apply emotional intelligence in varied scenarios, making quantitative measurement challenging.

How can organizations effectively certify collaboration?

Effective certification moves beyond self-assessments and utilizes 360-degree feedback mechanisms, Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) to see who genuinely connects silos, and scenario-based evaluations that test a person’s ability to foster psychological safety and manage conflict constructively.

What is the business value of certifying soft skills?

Certifying soft skills provides a tangible framework for creating a human-centered culture. It leads to better innovation through diverse perspectives, faster adoption of change initiatives due to higher trust, and improved retention by valuing the human element of work.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credits: Google Gemini

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Combining Big Data with Empathy Interviews

Leave a reply

Triangulating Truth

Combining Big Data with Empathy Interviews

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
LAST UPDATED: January 15, 2026 at 10:23AM

Triangulating Truth: Combining Big Data with Empathy Interviews

By Braden Kelley

In the hallowed halls of modern enterprise, Big Data has become a sort of secular deity. We bow before dashboards, sacrifice our intuition at the altar of spreadsheets, and believe that if we just gather enough petabytes, the “truth” of our customers will emerge. But data, for all its power, has a significant limitation: it can tell you everything about what your customers are doing, yet it remains profoundly silent on why they are doing it.

If we want to lead human-centered change and drive meaningful innovation, we must stop treating data and empathy as opposing forces. Instead, we must practice the art of triangulation. We need to combine the cold, hard “What” of Big Data with the warm, messy “Why” of Empathy Interviews to find the resonant truth that lives in the intersection.

“Big Data can tell you that 40% of your users drop off at the third step of your checkout process, but it takes an empathy interview to realize they are dropping off because that step makes them feel untrusted. You can optimize a click with data, but you build a relationship with empathy.” — Braden Kelley

The Blind Spots of the Spreadsheet

Data is a rearview mirror. It captures the digital exhaust of past behaviors. While it is incredibly useful for spotting trends and identifying friction points at scale, it is inherently limited by its own parameters. You can only analyze the data you choose to collect. If a customer is struggling with your product for a reason you haven’t thought to measure, that struggle will remain invisible on your dashboard.

This is where human-centered innovation comes in. Empathy interviews — deep, open-ended conversations that prioritize listening over selling — allow us to step out from behind the screen and into the user’s reality. They uncover “Thick Data,” a term popularized by Tricia Wang, which refers to the qualitative information that provides context and meaning to the quantitative patterns.

Case Study 1: The “Functional” Failure of a Health App

The Quantitative Signal

A leading healthcare technology company launched a sophisticated app designed to help chronic patients track their medication. The Big Data was glowing initially: high download rates and excellent initial onboarding. However, after three weeks, the data showed a catastrophic “churn” rate. Users simply stopped logging their pills.

The Empathy Insight

The data team suggested a technical fix — more push notifications and gamified rewards. But the innovation team chose to conduct empathy interviews. They visited patients in their homes. What they found was heartbreakingly human. Patients didn’t forget their pills; rather, every time the app pinged them, it felt like a reminder of their illness. The app’s sterile, clinical design and constant alerts made them feel like “patients” rather than people trying to live their lives. The friction wasn’t functional; it was emotional.

The Triangulated Result

By combining the “what” (drop-off at week three) with the “why” (emotional fatigue), the company pivoted. They redesigned the app to focus on “Wellness Goals” and life milestones, using softer language and celebratory tones. Churn plummeted because they solved the human problem the data couldn’t see.

Triangulation: What They Say vs. What They Do

True triangulation involves three distinct pillars of insight:

Big Data: What they actually did (the objective record).
Empathy Interviews: What they say they feel and want (the subjective narrative).
Observation: What we see when we watch them use the product (the behavioral truth).

Often, these three pillars disagree. A customer might say they want a “professional” interface (Interview), but the Data shows they spend more time on pages with vibrant, casual imagery. The “Truth” isn’t in one or the other; it’s in the tension between them. As an innovation speaker, I often tell my audiences: “Don’t listen to what customers say; listen to why they are saying it.”

Case Study 2: Reimagining the Bank Branch

The Quantitative Signal

A regional bank saw a 30% decline in branch visits over two years. The Big Data suggested that physical branches were becoming obsolete and that investment should shift entirely to the mobile app. To the data-driven executive, the answer was to close 50% of the locations.

The Empathy Insight

The bank conducted empathy interviews with “low-frequency” visitors. They discovered that while customers used the app for routine tasks, they felt a deep sense of anxiety about major life events — buying a first home, managing an inheritance, or starting a business. They weren’t coming to the branch because the branch felt like a transaction center (teller lines and glass barriers), which didn’t match their need for high-stakes advice.

The Triangulated Result

The bank didn’t close the branches; they transformed them. They used data to identify which branches should remain as transaction hubs and which should be converted into “Advice Centers” with coffee-shop vibes and private consultation rooms. They used the app to handle the “what” and the human staff to handle the “why.” Profitability per square foot increased because they addressed the human need for reassurance that the data had initially misinterpreted as a desire for total digital isolation.

Leading the Change

To implement this in your organization, you must break down the silos between your Data Scientists and your Design Researchers. When these two groups collaborate, they become a formidable force for human-centered change.

Start by taking an anomaly in your data — something that doesn’t make sense — and instead of running another query, go out and talk to five people. Ask them about their day, their frustrations, and their dreams. You will find that the most valuable insights aren’t hidden in a server farm; they are hidden in the stories your customers are waiting to tell you.

If you are looking for an innovation speaker to help your team bridge this gap, remember that the most successful organizations are those that can speak both the language of the machine and the language of the heart.

Frequently Asked Questions on Insight Triangulation

Q: What is the primary danger of relying solely on Big Data for innovation?

A: Big Data is excellent at showing “what” is happening, but it is blind to “why.” Relying only on data leads to optimizing the status quo rather than discovering breakthrough needs, as data only reflects past behaviors and cannot capture the emotional friction or unmet desires of the user.

Q: How do empathy interviews complement quantitative analytics?

A: Empathy interviews provide the “thick data” — the context, emotions, and stories that explain the anomalies in the quantitative charts. They allow innovators to see the world through the user’s eyes, identifying the root causes of friction that data points can only hint at.

Q: What is “Triangulating Truth” in a business context?

A: It is the strategic practice of validating insights by looking at them from three angles: what people say (interviews), what people do (observations), and what the data shows (analytics). When these three align, you have found a reliable truth worth investing in.

Image credits: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Metrics for Systemic Human-Centered Design Success

Leave a reply

Measuring Empathy

LAST UPDATED: December 23, 2025 at 1:51PM

Metrics for Systemic Human-Centered Design Success

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Empathy is frequently praised and rarely operationalized. In too many organizations, it lives in sticky notes, inspirational posters, and kickoff workshops — disconnected from how decisions are actually made. As human-centered design matures from a project-level practice into an enterprise capability, empathy must become measurable, repeatable, and systemic.

Measuring empathy is not about stripping humanity from design. It is about ensuring that human understanding survives scale, complexity, and quarterly pressure.

Re-framing Empathy as a Capability

Empathy is often misunderstood as an individual trait. In reality, sustainable empathy is an organizational capability supported by structures, incentives, and feedback loops. The question leaders should ask is not “Are our designers empathetic?” but rather “Does our system consistently produce empathetic outcomes?”

Metrics provide the answer.

A Practical Empathy Measurement Framework

1. Human Insight Integrity

These metrics assess whether decisions are grounded in real human understanding:

Percentage of strategic initiatives informed by primary research
Recency of customer insights used in decisions
Inclusion of marginalized or edge users

Outdated or secondhand insights are a hidden empathy killer.

2. Experience Friction Reduction

Empathy should reduce unnecessary effort and stress:

Time-on-task improvements
Drop-off and abandonment rates
Emotion-based experience ratings

3. Organizational Behavior Change

Look for evidence that empathy is shaping behavior:

Frequency of cross-functional research participation
Leadership presence in customer interactions
Reuse of validated insights across teams

4. Long-Term System Health

At scale, empathy improves system resilience:

Reduction in rework and failure demand
Employee engagement and retention
Trust and loyalty over time

“Empathy is not proven by how deeply we feel in a workshop, but by how consistently our systems change behavior in the real world. If you can’t measure that change, empathy remains a belief instead of a capability.”

Braden Kelley

Case Study 1: Retail Banking Transformation

A large retail bank invested heavily in digital channels but continued to see declining trust. By introducing empathy metrics focused on customer anxiety and clarity, the bank discovered that customers felt overwhelmed rather than empowered.

Design teams simplified language, reduced choice overload, and measured success through emotional confidence indicators. Within eighteen months, complaint volume dropped while product adoption increased — a clear signal of systemic empathy at work.

Case Study 2: Public Transportation Services

A metropolitan transit authority applied empathy metrics to rider experience. Beyond punctuality, they measured perceived safety, clarity of wayfinding, and stress during disruptions.

By addressing emotional pain points and tracking their reduction, the authority improved satisfaction without major infrastructure investment, proving that empathy can outperform capital expenditure.

Embedding Empathy into Governance

Empathy metrics only matter if they influence decisions. Leading organizations embed them into:

Executive dashboards
Investment prioritization
Performance reviews

When empathy metrics sit alongside financial and operational metrics, they shape trade-offs instead of reacting to them.

The Future of Human-Centered Measurement

As AI and automation accelerate, empathy will become a primary differentiator. Organizations that can measure and manage it will design systems that are not only efficient, but humane.

The goal is not perfect empathy. The goal is continuous human understanding at scale.

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ

Why are empathy metrics necessary?
They ensure human needs remain visible and actionable as organizations scale.

Do empathy metrics replace qualitative research?
No. They amplify and sustain qualitative insights over time.

What is the first empathy metric to implement?
Track how often real customer insights directly inform decisions.

Image credits: Pixabay, Google Gemini

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovation Quotes of the Day – April 30, 2012

1 Reply

“Albert Einstein wrote, ‘Everybody is a genius! But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid!’
We are all capable of doing one thing better than any other person alive at this time in history!”

– Matthew Kelly

“In order for innovation to reliably happen at every level of the organization, it will be extremely useful for all members to have access to the voice of the customer.”

– Braden Kelley

“Imagination is not only the uniquely human capacity to envision that which is not, and therefore the fount of all invention and innovation. In its arguably most transformative and revelatory capacity, it is the power to that enables us to empathize with humans whose experiences we have never shared.”

– J.K. Rowling

What are some of your favorite innovation quotes?

Add one or more to the comments, listing the quote and who said it, and I’ll share the best of the submissions as future innovation quotes of the day!

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.