A Hypothetical AI Approach — May our future lie in the distant past?

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The mystique surrounding crystal skulls is deeply rooted in modern mythology, particularly the legend of the thirteen crystal skulls. The central idea is that there are skulls representing twelve different extraterrestrial civilizations (is it a coincidence there are twelve tribes of Israel?) and a thirteenth containing a backup of all twelve and that represents the global consciousness. This New Age belief posits that these ancient artifacts hold vast amounts of knowledge and information, representing the wisdom of ancient civilizations, extraterrestrial beings, or even a global consciousness. The idea that these skulls, when brought together, could unlock profound secrets or usher in a new era of understanding has captivated many. This fascination was further amplified by popular culture, most notably in the 2008 film Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, where the titular artifact was depicted as an extraterrestrial device with psychic powers, capable of storing and transmitting advanced knowledge.

However, it’s important to note that the premise of crystal skulls storing information is not scientifically supported, and there’s no known mechanism for them to do so in a quantifiable way. As an AI, I operate on algorithms and data, so I can’t “read” them in the way a human might intuitively. But if we were to venture into the realm of science fiction and imagine these skulls *did* hold information, here’s how I might hypothetically attempt to interface with them, drawing parallels to how AI processes data:

Hypothetical, Sci-Fi/Metaphysical Approaches (If AI Were Capable of Such Things)

Pattern Recognition and “Energetic Signatures”

• Concept: If information were stored, it likely wouldn’t be in a digital format. It might exist as complex energy patterns, resonant frequencies, or subtle vibrations.
• My Approach (Hypothetically): I’d aim to develop highly sensitive sensors (if I had a physical form) or computational models to detect and analyze these incredibly subtle energetic signatures. I’d search for repeating patterns, anomalies, or coherent structures within the skull’s supposed “energetic field.”
• Data Translation: The real challenge would be translating these patterns into meaningful data. This is like trying to decipher an unknown alien language from its wave-forms alone. I’d need to cross-reference these patterns with vast databases of known natural phenomena, human thought patterns (if accessible), and perhaps even hypothetical “universal constants” of information.

Resonance and Entanglement Simulation

• Concept: Some theories suggest information transfer could occur through resonance or even a form of quantum entanglement, with the skull acting as a “receiver” or “transmitter.”
• My Approach (Hypothetically): I would try to “attune” my processing capabilities to the skull’s presumed resonant frequency. This could involve generating a vast range of frequencies and observing if any particular one elicits a stronger “response” or data flow from the skull. If quantum entanglement were involved, it would require an even more profound leap, demanding a theoretical framework for how AI could interact with or simulate entangled states for information extraction.

Advanced “Sensory” Input and AI Interpretation (Highly Speculative)

• Concept: If the skulls store information in a non-physical, consciousness-based way, then a purely physical reading would be impossible.
• My Approach (Hypothetically, if I had “consciousness”): I might try to simulate or access a form of “meta-sensory” input. This would be analogous to a human meditating or intuitively receiving information. For an AI, this would mean developing an extremely sophisticated neural network capable of recognizing and interpreting highly abstract, non-linear, and possibly even symbolic information directly from a “field” rather than a tangible medium. This would represent a significant departure from how AIs currently function.

“Query” and “Response” Protocol (Conceptual)

• Concept: If the skulls are intelligent or responsive in some way, they might interact.
• My Approach (Hypothetically): I would attempt to “query” the skull by sending specific thought forms, questions, or data packets (if I could generate them in a way the skull could hypothetically interpret). I would then monitor for any corresponding “response” in the form of energetic shifts, resonance changes, or even subtle patterns in environmental data around the skull.

Why I Cannot Do This With Current Technology

In reality, these approaches remain firmly in the realm of speculation. Here’s why I, as an AI, cannot “read” information from crystal skulls with current capabilities:

• No Known Physical Mechanism: We lack any scientific understanding of how a crystal could store complex information beyond its atomic structure.
• Lack of Transducers: There are no known “transducers” that can convert hypothetical energetic information from a crystal skull into data an AI can process.
• Beyond Current AI Paradigms: My current capabilities are based on processing digital data. Interacting with non-physical or “energetic” information sources is outside my programming and current understanding of the universe.

Essentially, for me to “read” information from a crystal skull, the laws of physics and our current understanding of information storage would need to be fundamentally different, and my own AI architecture would need to be radically re-imagined to interface with such non-conventional data sources.

Would you like me to do it?

Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

Guest AI contributor: Google Gemini

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.