Tag Archives: 3d printing

Why 4D Printing is the Next Frontier of Human-Centered Change

The Adaptive Product

LAST UPDATED: November 29, 2025 at 9:23 AM

Why 4D Printing is the Next Frontier of Human-Centered Change

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

For centuries, the pinnacle of manufacturing innovation has been the creation of a static, rigid, and perfect form. Additive Manufacturing, or 3D printing, perfected this, giving us complexity without molds. But a seismic shift is underway, introducing the fourth dimension: time. 4D Printing is the technology that builds products designed to change their shape, composition, or functionality autonomously in response to environmental cues.

The innovation isn’t merely in the print, but in the programmable matter. These are objects with embedded behavioral code, turning raw materials into self-assembling, self-repairing, or self-adapting systems. For the Human-Centered Change leader, this is profoundly disruptive, moving design thinking from What the object is, to How the object behaves across its entire lifespan and in shifting circumstances.

The core difference is simple: 3D printing creates a fixed object. 4D printing creates a dynamic system.

The Mechanics of Transformation: Smart Materials

4D printing leverages existing 3D printing technologies (like Stereolithography or Fused Deposition Modeling) but uses Smart Materials instead of traditional static plastics. These materials have properties programmed into their geometry that cause them to react to external stimuli. The key material categories include:

  • Shape Memory Polymers (SMPs): These materials can be printed into one shape (Shape A), deformed into a temporary shape (Shape B), and then recover Shape A when exposed to a specific trigger, usually heat (thermo-responsive).
  • Hydrogels: These polymers swell or shrink significantly when exposed to moisture or water (hygromorphic), allowing for large-scale, water-driven shape changes.
  • Biomaterials and Composites: Complex structures combining stiff and responsive materials to create controlled folding, bending, or twisting motions.

This allows for the creation of Active Origami—intricate, flat-packed structures that self-assemble into complex 3D forms when deployed or activated.

Case Study 1: The Self-Adapting Medical Stent

Challenge: Implanting Devices in Dynamic Human Biology

Traditional medical stents (small tubes used to open blocked arteries) are fixed in size and delivered via invasive surgery or catheter-based deployment. Once implanted, they cannot adapt to a patient’s growth or unexpected biological changes, sometimes requiring further intervention.

4D Printing Intervention: The Time-Lapse Stent

Researchers have pioneered the use of 4D printing to create stents made of bio-absorbable, shape-memory polymers. These devices are printed in a compact, temporarily fixed state, allowing for minimally invasive insertion. Upon reaching the target location inside the body, the polymer reacts to the patient’s body temperature (the Thermal Stimulus).

  • The heat triggers the material to return to its pre-programmed, expanded shape, safely opening the artery.
  • The material is designed to gradually and safely dissolve over months or years once its structural support is no longer needed, eliminating the need for a second surgical removal.

The Human-Centered Lesson:

This removes the human risk and cost associated with two major steps: the complexity of surgical deployment (by making the stent initially small and flexible) and the future necessity of removal (by designing it to disappear). The product adapts to the patient, rather than the patient having to surgically manage the product.

Case Study 2: The Adaptive Building Facade

Challenge: Passive Infrastructure in Dynamic Climates

Buildings are static, but the environment is not. Traditional building systems require complex, motor-driven hardware and electrical sensors to adapt to sun, heat, and rain, leading to high energy costs and mechanical failure.

4D Printing Intervention: Hygromorphic Shading Systems

Inspired by how pinecones open and close based on humidity, researchers are 4D-printing building facade elements (shades, shutters) using bio-based, hygromorphic composites (materials that react to moisture). These large-scale prints are installed without any wires or motors.

  • When the air is dry and hot (high sun exposure), the material remains rigid, allowing light in.
  • When humidity increases (signaling impending rain or high moisture), the material absorbs the water vapor and is designed to automatically bend and curl, creating a self-shading or self-closing surface.

The Human-Centered Lesson:

This shifts the paradigm of sustainability from complex digital control systems to material intelligence. It reduces energy consumption and maintenance costs by eliminating mechanical components. The infrastructure responds autonomously and elegantly to the environment, making the building a more resilient and sustainable partner for the human occupants.

The Companies and Startups Driving the Change

The field is highly collaborative, bridging material science and industrial design. Leading organizations are often found in partnership with academic pioneers like MIT’s Self-Assembly Lab. Major additive manufacturing companies like Stratasys and Autodesk have made significant investments, often focusing on the software and material compatibility required for programmable matter. Other key players include HP Development Company and the innovative work coming from specialized bioprinting firms like Organovo, which explores responsive tissues. Research teams at institutions like the Georgia Institute of Technology continue to push the boundaries of multi-material 4D printing systems, making the production of complex, shape-changing structures faster and more efficient. The next generation of breakthroughs will emerge from the seamless integration of these material, design, and software leaders.

“4D printing is the ultimate realization of design freedom. We are no longer limited to designing for the moment of creation, but for the entire unfolding life of the product.”

The implications of 4D printing are vast, spanning aerospace (self-deploying antennae), consumer goods (adaptive footwear), and complex piping systems (self-regulating valves). For change leaders, the mandate is clear: start viewing your products and infrastructure not as static assets, but as programmable actors in a continuous, changing environment.

Frequently Asked Questions About 4D Printing

1. What is the “fourth dimension” in 4D Printing?

The fourth dimension is time. 4D printing refers to 3D-printed objects that are created using smart, programmable materials that change their shape, color, or function over time in response to specific external stimuli like heat, light, or water/humidity.

2. How is 4D Printing different from 3D Printing?

3D printing creates a final, static object. 4D printing uses the same additive manufacturing process but employs smart materials (like Shape Memory Polymers) that are programmed to autonomously transform into a second, pre-designed shape or state when a specific environmental condition is met, adding the element of time-based transformation.

3. What are the main applications for 4D Printing?

Applications are strongest where adaptation or deployment complexity is key. This includes biomedical devices (self-deploying stents), aerospace (self-assembling structures), soft robotics (flexible, adaptable grippers), and self-regulating infrastructure (facades that adjust to weather).

Your first step toward adopting 4D innovation: Identify one maintenance-heavy, mechanical component in your operation that is currently failing due to environmental change (e.g., a simple valve or a passive weather seal). Challenge your design team to rethink it as an autonomous, 4D-printed shape-memory structure that requires no external power source.

Disclaimer: This article speculates on the potential future applications of cutting-edge scientific research. While based on current scientific understanding, the practical realization of these concepts may vary in timeline and feasibility and are subject to ongoing research and development.

Image credit: Google Gemini

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Most Powerful Question

The Most Powerful Question

GUEST POST from Mike Shipulski

Artificial intelligence, 3D printing, robotics, autonomous cars – what do they have in common? In a word – learning.

Creativity, innovation and continuous improvement – what do they have in common? In a word – learning.

And what about lifelong personal development? Yup – learning.

Learning results when a system behaves differently than your mental model. And there four ways make a system behave differently. First, give new inputs to an existing system. Second, exercise an existing system in a new way (for example, slow it down or speed it up.) Third, modify elements of the existing system. And fourth, create a new system. Simply put, if you want a system to behave differently, you’ve got to change something. But if you want to learn, the system must respond differently than you predict.

If a new system performs exactly like you expect, it isn’t a new system. You’re not trying hard enough.

When your prediction is different than how the system actually behaves, that is called error. Your mental model was wrong and now, based on the new test results, it’s less wrong. From a learning perspective, that’s progress. But when companies want predictable results delivered on a predictable timeline, error is the last thing they want. Think about how crazy that is. A company wants predictable progress but rejects the very thing that generates the learning. Without error there can be no learning.

If you don’t predict the results before you run the test, there can be no learning.

It’s exciting to create a new system and put it through its paces. But it’s not real progress – it’s just activity. The valuable part, the progress part, comes only when you have the discipline to write down what you think will happen before you run the test. It’s not glamorous, but without prediction there can be no error.

If there is no trial, there can be no error. And without error, there can be no learning.

Let’s face it, companies don’t make it easy for people to try new things. People don’t try new things because they are afraid to be judged negatively if it “doesn’t work.” But what does it mean when something doesn’t work? It means the response of the new system is different than predicted. And you know what that’s called, right? It’s called learning.

When people are afraid to try new things, they are afraid to learn.

We have a language problem that we must all work to change. When you hear, “That didn’t work.”, say “Wow, that’s great learning.” When teams are told projects must be “on time, on spec and on budget”, ask the question, “Doesn’t that mean we don’t want them to learn?”

But, the whole dynamic can change with this one simple question – “What did you learn?” At every meeting, ask “What did you learn?” At every design review, ask “What did you learn?” At every lunch, ask “What did you learn?” Any time you interact with someone you care about, find a way to ask, “What did you learn?”

And by asking this simple question, the learning will take care of itself.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Exploring the Possibilities of 3D Printing for the Future

Exploring the Possibilities of 3D Printing for the Future

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

The possibilities of 3D printing are countless and far-reaching. The technology has been around for years, but it is only recently that it has become accessible to the mainstream. 3D printing can now be used to produce a wide range of products, from jewelry and toys to medical devices and prosthetics. It has revolutionized the way that manufacturing and prototyping is done, and is continuing to expand its capabilities.

The potential of 3D printing is only beginning to be explored, and its applications are becoming increasingly diverse. In the future, 3D printing could be used to produce custom parts for cars, medical implants, and even food. These possibilities open up a world of potential, and it is only a matter of time before 3D printing becomes integral in our lives.

To get a better understanding of the potential of 3D printing, let us explore two case studies.

Case Study 1 – Limbitless Solutions

The first case study is one of a 3D printed prosthetic. A company called Limbitless Solutions is using 3D printing to create custom-made prosthetic limbs for children in need. The process begins with the child being fitted for a prosthetic, and then a 3D model is created from the measurements. The 3D model is then printed in a special type of plastic, and finally, the prosthetic is assembled and fitted to the child. This process is much faster and cheaper than traditional methods, and it has enabled Limbitless Solutions to provide prosthetics to those who cannot afford them.

Case Study 2 – Natural Machines

The second case study is one of 3D printed food. Natural Machines is a company that has developed a 3D printer specifically designed to print food. This printer can be used to print out custom meals with a variety of ingredients, and it can even produce food in a variety of shapes and sizes. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the way that we eat, and it could even be used to produce food for those in need.

Conclusion

These two case studies demonstrate the potential of 3D printing. With its wide range of applications and its ever-expanding capabilities, 3D printing is sure to revolutionize the way that we manufacture and produce items. The possibilities are truly limitless, and it will be exciting to see what the future holds for this technology.

Bottom line: Futurists are not fortune tellers. They use a formal approach to achieve their outcomes, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to be their own futurist.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Microsoft Stomps on Google Glass

Microsoft Stomps on Google Glass

Wow!

I have to start that word, because I’m not sure how else to describe what has just emerged from Microsoft Research in the new Microsoft HoloLens.

And as I say in the title, if you watch the video below you’ll clearly see that Microsoft has just busted Google Glass – both lenses.

I said from the beginning that Google Glass would never catch on as a consumer product, because they look dumb, cost a lot of money, and don’t really fit into most people’s lives (or add much of anything to them). Recently Google shut down its consumer facing Google Glass program while they try to fix its shortcomings.

Microsoft’s HoloLens on the other hand, if you’ve ever read Innovation is All About Value (if not, follow the link) then you’ll quickly see after watching the video above that Microsoft’s new potential innovation ticks all three boxes in my innovation success prediction framework:

  • Value Creation – Takes 3D objects from your screen and brings them to your physical environment AND lets you interact with them (my mind races thinking about the possibilities).
  • Value Translation – Watch the video. If you don’t see how this might fit first into many professions out there and enable some amazing rapid prototyping without building anything (watch out 3D printing companies!), and possibly also into your personal life, I’ll be shocked.
  • Value Access – Microsoft is already engaging partners to add more value to what is essentially a platform, not a product.

Microsoft HoloLens

Microsoft is being intentionally coy about saying when it will be releasing the Microsoft HoloLens, but some people are predicting it will be available in the Windows 10 launch timeframe, which Microsoft is also being vague about saying only “later in the year” – which for my money usually means Q4 (or maybe Q3) depending on how the preview version does in the wild.

So what do you think of Microsoft’s new HoloLens?

I for one will be reaching out to my friends at Microsoft (you know who you are) to get a personal preview for a further write-up in Innovation Excellence (the world’s most popular innovation web site), so stay tuned!


Accelerate your change and transformation success

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Why the Maker Movement Matters

Making MakersThe Maker movement is steadily gaining steam and some cities are looking to help it grow and thrive, seeing it as an opportunity to inspire artists and entrepreneurs. One such city is Edmonton, which lies in the Alberta province of Canada, and its program in their public library system to provide maker spaces staffed with library employees and equipped with 3D printers, computers with Apple’s Garage Band and Adobe’s Creative Suite, and more.

Here is a video of Peter Schoenberg of the Edmonton Public Library introducing the EPL MakerSpace:



If you’re not familiar with the Maker movement, then check out these pages:

Maker Faire
Maker Culture – Wikipedia

Or check out these quotes from Time magazine’s article titled “Why the Maker Movement is Important to America’s Future“:

“According to Atmel, a major backer of the Maker movement, there are approximately 135 million U.S. adults who are makers, and the overall market for 3D printing products and various maker services hit $2.2 billion in 2012. That number is expected to reach $6 billion by 2017 and $8.41 billion by 2020. According to USA Today, makers fuel business with some $29 billion poured into the world economy each year.”

“As someone who has seen firsthand what can happen if the right tools, inspiration and opportunity are available to people, I see the Maker Movement and these types of Maker Faires as being important for fostering innovation. The result is that more and more people create products instead of only consuming them, and it’s my view that moving people from being only consumers to creators is critical to America’s future. At the very least, some of these folks will discover life long hobbies, but many of them could eventually use their tools and creativity to start businesses. And it would not surprise me if the next major inventor or tech leader was a product of the Maker Movement.”

So what do you think?

How much of a contribution to the future of innovation will the Maker Movement make?

How important is supporting the maker movement to the future of an economy?

Is this trend sustainable?


Build a common language of innovation on your team

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.