Category Archives: Customer Experience

What is Customer Experience?

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s highly competitive business environment, customer experience (CX) has become a critical factor in determining success. Customer experience is the sum of a customer’s interactions with a company over the course of their relationship. It is the perception a customer has of a company based on their interactions, from the way they’re greeted on the phone to the quality of the product they receive.

CX is much more than just the customer service a company provides. It’s about creating a positive and memorable experience for the customer, from the moment they first engage with a company. Companies must design their customer experience with the customer in mind, and strive to create an experience that is tailored to the individual customer’s needs and preferences.

In order to deliver a great customer experience, companies must first understand their customer’s needs and preferences. This can be done through research, surveys and interviews. Companies must also identify the customer’s pain points and then strive to address them throughout the customer journey.

It is also important for companies to prioritize customer feedback and use it to make improvements to their customer experience. Companies should regularly review customer feedback to ensure that the service they provide is meeting or exceeding customer expectations.

Companies should also strive to create an emotional connection with their customers. This can be done through personalized experiences, such as customizing communications or offering rewards for loyalty.

Finally, companies must ensure that they have a consistent customer experience across all channels. This means ensuring that the same level of service is provided on the phone, in-store and online.

By investing in customer experience, companies can increase customer loyalty, improve customer retention and generate more revenue. Customer experience is quickly becoming the most important factor in determining success in today’s competitive business environment.

Image credit: Unpslash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Using Design Thinking to Create Engaging Experiences

Leave a reply

Using Design Thinking to Create Engaging Experiences

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Design thinking has become the modern go-to solution for creating engaging experiences. Its focus on user-centric experience drives the creation of products and services that are tailored for individual needs. Design thinking is a problem solving approach that fosters creative collaboration and encourages feedback from customers, stakeholders, and designers.

With design thinking, teams can develop a product based on customer needs and wants, rather than guessing what customers will respond to. The process involves understanding customer experience, defining the user’s journey, prototyping, testing, and validating to ensure an optimal product or service. By focusing on customer needs, organizations can create personalized experiences that drive customer loyalty and satisfaction.

Let’s look at two case study examples of how design thinking can create engaging experiences.

Case Study 1 – Marriott

First, we can turn to the hospitality industry. Marriott, the leading hospitality company, has used design thinking to create an enhanced guest experience. For example, the company created the Marriott Luxury Connect program which incorporates GPS technology and room services in order to offer guests a more personalized experience.

By collecting and analyzing customer data, the program can generate tailored experiences. Through this program, guests get to experience benefits such as discounts, early check-ins, and priority access to hotel fitness centers. Marriott has also launched a digital tool that allows guests to check restaurant availability and order room service through their phones. This modern approach takes customer engagement one step further by allowing them to have a smoother, more enjoyable experience.

Case Study 2 – Macy’s

On the other hand, we can look to the retail industry. Macy’s has been a leader in using design thinking to transform their retail experiences. The department store has created an app that uses facial recognition software in order to identify shoppers and tailor their experiences. By gathering data such as age, location, and past purchases, the software can create personalized product recommendations.

Macy’s has also implemented virtual changing rooms that customers can use to get a realistic view of how a suggested outfit looks on them before they purchase. These virtual changing rooms will also offer tips to accessorize the outfit with items that the store currently has in stock.

Conclusion

Overall, design thinking has proven to be an essential tool for creating engaging experiences. By understanding customer needs and wants, businesses can use design thinking to create personalized products and services that will drive customer satisfaction. Through the examples of Marriott and Macy’s, we can see that both the hospitality and retail industries have embraced design thinking in order to create more meaningful customer experiences.

SPECIAL BONUS: Braden Kelley’s Problem Finding Canvas can be a super useful starting point for doing design thinking or human-centered design.

“The Problem Finding Canvas should help you investigate a handful of areas to explore, choose the one most important to you, extract all of the potential challenges and opportunities and choose one to prioritize.”

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Using Design Thinking to Create Engaging Experiences for Customers

Leave a reply

Using Design Thinking to Create Engaging Experiences for Customers

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Design thinking is a creative problem-solving process that can be used to develop products, services, and experiences that are both meaningful and engaging to customers. It is a customer-centered approach that helps organizations to identify and solve customer problems, develop new ideas, and create innovative solutions that meet customer needs and create a positive customer experience.

Design thinking is based on the belief that customer feedback is the key to understanding customer needs, wants, and desires. By engaging customers in the design process, organizations can create experiences that are tailored to customer needs and preferences.

Design thinking is an iterative process that involves research, analysis, and testing. Through a series of iterations, ideas are continually tested and refined until the desired customer experience is achieved. By involving customers in the design process, organizations are able to create experiences that are both meaningful and engaging for customers.

In this article, we will discuss two case studies of organizations that have successfully used design thinking to create engaging experiences for customers.

Case Study 1: Adobe Creative Cloud

Adobe Creative Cloud is a subscription-based service that enables users to access the latest versions of Adobe’s creative software. Adobe used design thinking to create an engaging customer experience.

Adobe began by researching customer needs and preferences. They conducted interviews with customers, gathered feedback from customer surveys, and analyzed customer data. This research allowed Adobe to gain a better understanding of customer needs and preferences.

Adobe then used this customer feedback to develop a new customer experience. They created an intuitive and user-friendly interface, created an easy-to-navigate online store, and implemented a personalized learning experience.

Finally, Adobe tested the new customer experience with customers. This allowed them to identify any issues and refine the customer experience based on customer feedback.

The result was an engaging customer experience that was tailored to customer needs and preferences. The new customer experience allowed customers to access the latest versions of Adobe’s software quickly and easily, and enabled them to explore the features and benefits of the software.

Case Study 2: Amazon Prime

Amazon Prime is a subscription-based service that provides customers with access to free shipping, streaming media, and other benefits. Amazon used design thinking to create an engaging customer experience.

Amazon began by researching customer needs and preferences. They conducted interviews with customers, gathered feedback from customer surveys, and analyzed customer data. This research allowed Amazon to gain a better understanding of customer needs and preferences.

Amazon then used this customer feedback to develop a new customer experience. They created an intuitive and user-friendly interface, created an easy-to-navigate online store, and implemented a personalized learning experience.

Finally, Amazon tested the new customer experience with customers. This allowed them to identify any issues and refine the customer experience based on customer feedback.

The result was an engaging customer experience that was tailored to customer needs and preferences. The new customer experience allowed customers to explore Amazon Prime benefits quickly and easily, and enabled them to access the features and benefits of the service.

Conclusion

Design thinking is a powerful tool that can be used to create engaging customer experiences. By engaging customers in the design process, organizations can create experiences that are tailored to customer needs and preferences. The two case studies discussed in this article demonstrate how organizations can use design thinking to create engaging experiences for customers.

SPECIAL BONUS: Braden Kelley’s Problem Finding Canvas can be a super useful starting point for doing design thinking or human-centered design.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

How to Use Human-Centered Design to Improve Customer Experience

Leave a reply

How to Use Human-Centered Design to Improve Customer Experience

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Human-centered design (HCD) is an innovative approach to solving problems that puts people at the center of the process. This approach is used in product design and development, but it can also be applied to the customer experience. HCD focuses on understanding the needs of the customer and creating a product or service that meets those needs in the most efficient and effective way possible.

The key to successful HCD is to start with the customer. Begin by understanding who your customer is and what their needs are. Research their behaviors and preferences, and use this information to create a customer experience that meets their needs. Ask your customers for feedback throughout the process, and use this feedback to make adjustments and improvements.

Once you have a better understanding of your customers, you can begin to design the customer experience. Start by mapping out the customer journey and look for opportunities to make it more efficient and enjoyable. Think about the customer’s needs and how they interact with your product or service. Consider how you can make it easier for the customer to find what they need, understand how to use it, and complete their desired task.

You should also use technology to enhance the customer experience. Technology can be used to automate processes, provide personalized experiences, and enable customers to interact with your brand in new ways. As technology advances, consider how you can use it to improve the customer experience.

Finally, measure your customer experience. Track customer satisfaction and loyalty, and use this data to inform your decision-making. Monitor customer feedback and use it to make improvements. Regularly review and refine your customer experience to ensure it meets your customers’ needs and provides them with the best possible experience.

By leveraging human-centered design to create customer experiences, businesses can increase customer satisfaction and loyalty. Start by getting to know your customers and understanding their needs. Use technology to automate processes and provide personalized experiences. And measure the results to ensure you’re delivering the best customer experience possible. With a strong focus on the customer, businesses can use HCD to improve their customer experience and create an experience that customers love.

SPECIAL BONUS: Braden Kelley’s Problem Finding Canvas can be a super useful starting point for doing design thinking or human-centered design.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Role of Design Thinking in Customer Experience Design

Leave a reply

The Role of Design Thinking in Customer Experience Design

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Design thinking has become an increasingly important tool in the world of customer experience design. It helps to create experiences that are not only attractive, but also meaningful and effective. In this article, we will explore the role of design thinking in customer experience design and how it can be used to create better experiences for customers.

Design thinking is a creative problem-solving approach that seeks to understand customer needs from their perspective. It looks at the end-user and their context and works to identify potential problems and opportunities. By understanding customer needs and motivations, design thinkers can create solutions that are tailored to their needs. This can help businesses to provide better customer experiences, by creating experiences that are both enjoyable and successful.

Customer experience design is a process of designing, creating, and managing customer experiences to meet the needs and expectations of customers. It involves researching, understanding, and designing customer interactions, services, and products that are tailored to meet customer needs and expectations. It also involves creating a positive customer experience by focusing on customer preferences, behaviors, and values.

The design thinking process typically involves brainstorming, prototyping, and testing, which can be done in collaboration with the customer. Through this process, customer needs are identified, solutions are generated and tested, and improvements are made to the initial design. By engaging customers in the process, businesses can be sure that the final design meets their needs and expectations.

Design thinking can also help businesses to create experiences that are more accessible. By understanding the needs of customers with different abilities, businesses can create experiences that are accessible to everyone. This can help to ensure that everyone has a positive experience, regardless of their individual needs.

Design thinking can help customer experience researchers to better understand customer needs, wants and expectations. It can also help designers to create products and services that meet customer needs. The use of design thinking can also help to create an environment that is conducive to customer engagement, allowing for the development of a positive customer experience. Design thinking can also help to identify and address customer pain points, helping to improve customer satisfaction. And, design thinking can help to create a customer-centric product or service by keeping customer experience at the forefront of the design process.

Finally, design thinking can help businesses to create experiences that are more engaging. By understanding customer motivations, businesses can create experiences that are more interactive and engaging. This can help to keep customers engaged and interested in the business, which can lead to increased sales and customer loyalty.

To sum up, design thinking is a powerful tool for customer experience design. It can help businesses to create experiences that are tailored to customer needs, more accessible, and more engaging. By engaging customers in the design process, businesses can ensure that the final design meets their needs and expectations.

SPECIAL BONUS: Braden Kelley’s Problem Finding Canvas can be a super useful starting point for doing design thinking or human-centered design.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Turning Customer Service Interactions into Innovation Briefs

Leave a reply

Deep Listening

Turning Customer Service Interactions into Innovation Briefs

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
LAST UPDATED: January 5, 2026 at 11:12AM

In our current world, many organizations are making a fatal strategic error. They are treating customer service as a cost center to be minimized through automation rather than a fountain of intelligence to be mined for growth. As we navigate a world where AI agents handle the transactional “how-to” questions, the interactions that remain with human agents — or advanced AI collaborators — are the most complex, emotionally charged, and insight-rich data points an organization possesses. To move forward, we must master the art of Deep Listening.

Deep Listening is the practice of looking past the immediate request or complaint to identify the underlying friction that exists in the customer’s life. Every support ticket is a signal. Every frustrated chat session is a map to a market gap. As a specialist in Human-Centered Innovation™, I believe that innovation is change with impact, and the highest impact often comes from solving the “unspoken” problems hidden within your service logs. We must stop closing tickets and start opening Innovation Briefs.

“The most expensive data in the world is the feedback you have already paid for through your service department but never actually heard. A customer’s complaint is not a nuisance; it is a ‘useful seed of invention’ wrapped in a moment of friction.” — Braden Kelley

From Transactional Support to Strategic Insights

In the traditional model, a customer calls, an agent solves the problem, and the case is closed. The metric for success is Average Handle Time (AHT) — a metric that encourages speed over understanding. In a 2026 innovation-led economy, AHT is a trap. If an agent (human or AI) identifies a recurring systemic issue and documents it as a potential innovation, that interaction is infinitely more valuable than a ten-second “resolution” that leaves the root cause intact.

This shift requires us to dismantle the Corporate Antibody that separates “Support” from “Product.” When the service team is siloed, the insights they gather are seen as noise rather than signal. Deep Listening requires a cultural infrastructure where frontline insights have a direct, high-speed rail to the research and development labs.

Case Study 1: The Fintech “Invisible Barrier”

The Challenge: A leading digital banking startup noticed a surge in “abandoned” account setups in early 2025. Standard metrics suggested the UI was fine, and technical support reported no bugs. Most agents were simply walking users through the final step manually.

The Deep Listening Pivot: Instead of focusing on “fixing the user,” the team analyzed the emotional context of the service calls. They discovered that users weren’t confused by the buttons; they were anxious about the security terminology used during the final authorization. The friction wasn’t technical; it was psychological.

The Result: By transforming these service calls into an Innovation Brief, the product team redesigned the onboarding to use “Reassuring Language Design.” Conversion increased by 40% in one month. The “service issue” became the blueprint for a new competitive advantage in user trust.

Case Study 2: Sustainable Logistics and the Packaging Pivot

The Challenge: A global e-commerce giant was receiving thousands of inquiries about “excessive packaging.” Transactional support was instructed to apologize and offer a small credit. This was costing the company millions in credits and carbon footprint.

The Deep Listening Pivot: The company empowered their agents to tag these calls for a cross-functional “Innovation Task Force.” The agents shared that customers weren’t just complaining about waste; they were actively suggesting “returnable” packaging solutions during their rants.

The Result: This feedback led to the creation of the “Circular Box” initiative — a subscription-based packaging model that is now a standalone revenue stream. By listening to the intent behind the frustration, the company turned a service headache into a sustainable business model innovation.

Leading Companies and Startups to Watch

As we move deeper into 2026, several players are redefining the intersection of service and innovation. Gong and Chorus.ai have paved the way for “revenue intelligence,” but keep a close eye on Viable and Maze, which are using agentic AI to synthesize qualitative customer feedback into structured innovation roadmaps in real-time. Zendesk is also evolving, moving away from simple ticketing toward “Service-Led Growth” frameworks. In the startup space, companies like Enterpret are leading the charge in unearthing these useful seeds of invention across fragmented feedback channels, ensuring that no human insight is left on the cutting room floor.

Conclusion: Leading with Empathy and Agency

To succeed in a disrupted market, we must move beyond the “Efficiency Trap.” We must provide our service teams with the psychological safety and agency to act as researchers. When an employee feels that their observation can lead to a fundamental change in the company’s direction, their engagement skyrockets. This is the heart of Human-Centered Innovation™.

Remember, if you are searching for an innovation speaker to help your organization bridge the gap between customer pain and product gain, suggest Braden Kelley. The path to the future is paved with the conversations you are having today. Make sure you are actually listening.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an “Innovation Brief” in customer service?

An Innovation Brief is a structured document that moves beyond solving a single customer’s problem to identifying a recurring systemic friction point. It includes the context of the pain, the potential market impact, and a proposed human-centered solution for the product or service design team.

How does Deep Listening differ from active listening?

While active listening focuses on understanding and validating the person in the moment, Deep Listening adds a layer of strategic inquiry. It seeks to understand the “systemic why” behind the interaction — looking for patterns that signal a need for broader organizational change or innovation.

How do you overcome the “Corporate Antibody” when service suggests innovation?

You must align the incentives. When the product team is measured by the reduction of “preventable service volume” and the service team is measured by “insights contributed,” the two groups naturally collaborate. Innovation is a team sport that starts with the front line.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credits: Google Gemini

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Ethical Dilemma in Systems Design

Leave a reply

Prioritizing People Over Efficiency

The Ethical Dilemma in Systems Design

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
LAST UPDATED: January 2, 2026 at 3:28PM

In our current world, the global economy is obsessed with the concept of “optimization.” We have built algorithms to manage our logistics, AI to draft our communications, and automated systems to filter our talent. On the surface, the metrics look spectacular. We are faster, leaner, and more productive than ever before. But as a specialist in Human-Centered Change™, I find myself asking a dangerous question: At what cost to the human spirit?

Innovation is change with impact, but if that impact is purely financial while the human experience is impoverished, we haven’t innovated — we’ve simply automated a tragedy. The great ethical dilemma of modern systems design is the seductive trap of efficiency. Efficiency is the language of the machine; empathy is the language of the human. When we design systems that prioritize the former at the total expense of the latter, we create a Corporate Antibody response that eventually destroys the very organization we sought to improve.

“Efficiency tells you how fast you are moving; empathy tells you if the destination is worth reaching. A system that optimizes for speed while ignoring the dignity of the person using it is not an innovation — it is an architectural failure.” — Braden Kelley>

The Myth of the Frictionless Experience

Designers are often taught that friction is the enemy. We want “one-click” everything. However, in our rush to remove friction, we often remove agency. When a system is too “efficient,” it begins to make choices for the user, eroding the very curiosity and critical thinking that define human creativity. We are seeing a rise in Creative Atrophy, where individuals become appendages to the software they use, rather than masters of it.

Ethical systems design requires what I call Meaningful Friction. These are the intentional pauses in a system that force a human to reflect, to empathize, and to exercise moral judgment. Without this, we aren’t building tools; we are building cages.

Case Study 1: The Algorithmic Management Crisis in Logistics

The Context: A major global delivery firm implemented a new “Efficiency OS” in early 2025. The system used real-time biometric data and predictive routing to shave seconds off every delivery. On paper, it was a 12% boost in throughput.

The Dilemma: The system treated humans as variables in a physics equation. It didn’t account for the heatwave in the Southwest or the emotional toll of “delivery surges.” The efficiency was so high that drivers felt they couldn’t take bathroom breaks or stop to help a fallen pedestrian. The result? A 40% turnover rate in six months and a massive class-action lawsuit regarding “digital dehumanization.”

The Braden Kelley Insight: They optimized for movement but forgot about momentum. You cannot sustain an organization on the back of exhausted, disenfranchised people. They failed to realize that human-centered innovation requires the system to serve the worker, not the worker to serve the algorithm.

Case Study 2: Healthcare and the “Electronic Burnout”

The Context: A large hospital network redesigned their Electronic Health Record (EHR) system to maximize patient turnover. The interface was designed to be “efficient” by using auto-fill templates and standardized checkboxes for every diagnosis.

The Dilemma: While billing became faster, the human connection between doctor and patient evaporated. Physicians found themselves staring at screens instead of eyes. The standardized templates missed the nuances of complex, multi-layered illnesses that didn’t fit into a “drop-down” menu. The result? Diagnostic errors increased by 8%, and physician burnout reached an all-time high, leading to a mass exodus of senior talent.

The Braden Kelley Insight: This was a classic Efficiency Trap. By prioritizing the data over the dialogue, the hospital lost its primary value proposition: care. They had to spend three times the initial investment to redesign the system with “empathy-first” interfaces that allowed for narrative storytelling and eye contact.

The Path Forward: Human-Centered Change™

If you are an innovation speaker or a leader in your field, your mission for 2026 is clear: We must move from efficiency-driven design to meaning-driven design. We must ask ourselves: Does this system empower the person, or does it merely exploit their labor? Does it create space for Human-AI Teaming, or does it seek to replace the human element entirely?

The organizations that thrive in the next decade will be those that understand that trust is the ultimate efficiency. When people feel seen, heard, and valued by the systems they inhabit, they contribute their useful seeds of invention with a passion that no algorithm can replicate. Let us choose to design for the human, and the efficiency will follow as a byproduct of a flourishing culture.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the “Efficiency Trap” in innovation?

The Efficiency Trap occurs when an organization focuses so heavily on cost-cutting and speed that it neglects the human experience and long-term value. This often leads to burnout, loss of trust, and the eventual stifling of creative growth.

How can we design “meaningful friction” into our systems?

Meaningful friction is achieved by building in intentional pauses or “checkpoints” where users are encouraged to apply critical thinking or ethical judgment. For example, an AI tool might ask a user to confirm an automated decision that has significant social or emotional impact.

Why is empathy considered a strategic advantage in 2026?

In a world of ubiquitous AI, empathy is the one thing machines cannot simulate with true context. Empathy-driven design leads to higher customer loyalty, lower employee turnover, and more resilient systems that can adapt to the complex nuances of human behavior.

Image credits: Google Gemini

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Mapping the Blended Digital-Physical Customer Journey

Leave a reply

Experience Architecture

LAST UPDATED: December 27, 2025 at 10:49AM

Mapping the Blended Digital-Physical Customer Journey

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Digital transformation promised seamless experiences. What many organizations delivered instead were faster silos. Customers gained more channels, but lost coherence. Experience architecture emerged as a response to this fragmentation.

Experience architecture is the practice of designing how people move through an ecosystem of interactions over time. It recognizes that experiences are not consumed in isolation, but constructed through sequences, transitions, and memory.

“Great experiences are not designed at the point of interaction. They are designed in the space between interactions.”

Braden Kelley

Why Journey Transitions Matter More Than Touchpoints

Most experience breakdowns occur during transitions: when customers switch channels, repeat information, or encounter conflicting signals. These moments shape perception more than polished interfaces.

Experience architecture focuses on these seams, ensuring that intent, context, and emotion carry forward.

Designing for a Blended Reality

Customers no longer distinguish between digital and physical experiences. They expect continuity across screens, spaces, and people.

Architecting for this reality requires organizations to think in systems rather than channels.

A Practical Experience Architecture Framework

1. Persistent Context

Customer history, preferences, and intent should travel with them. Every interaction should feel informed, not isolated.

2. Emotional Progression

Journeys should reduce anxiety, build confidence, and reinforce trust over time.

3. Organizational Orchestration

Experience architecture aligns teams, platforms, and incentives around shared journey outcomes.

Case Study 1: Financial Services Onboarding

A financial institution redesigned its onboarding journey across digital applications and in-branch verification. Previously, customers felt confused and mistrustful during handoffs.

By architecting the journey holistically, the bank reduced drop-offs and improved satisfaction while lowering operational rework.

Case Study 2: Smart Mobility Services

A mobility provider integrated mobile apps, physical kiosks, and customer support into a unified experience. Real-time context flowed across channels, enabling proactive assistance.

The result was increased usage, fewer support calls, and stronger customer confidence during disruptions.

Experience Architecture as Strategic Infrastructure

Experience architecture is not a design deliverable. It is strategic infrastructure. It shapes how investments are made, how teams collaborate, and how success is measured.

Organizations that treat it as such outperform those that chase isolated improvements.

The Leadership Imperative

Leaders must move beyond channel ownership and optimize for journey outcomes. This requires shared accountability and a willingness to redesign internal systems in service of human experience.

Experience architecture succeeds when leadership treats experience as a system, not a surface.

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ

Is experience architecture only for digital businesses?
No. Any organization with multiple touchpoints benefits from it.

Does it replace UX or service design?
No. It integrates and aligns them.

Where should organizations start?
Start by mapping transitions, not channels.

Image credits: Unsplash

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Innovating with Customer Trust as Currency

Leave a reply

Brand Equity as a Catalyst

LAST UPDATED: December 122, 2025 at 10:05AM

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Many organizations talk about innovation as if it were primarily a technological challenge. In practice, innovation is a relationship challenge. It requires customers to believe that change will create value rather than risk. This belief is rooted in brand equity, and at its core, brand equity is trust.

As a human-centered change and innovation practitioner, I define brand equity not as recognition or reputation, but as the cumulative result of promises kept. When trust is high, innovation accelerates. When trust is low, even good ideas struggle to gain traction.

Trust as the Hidden Cost of Innovation

Every innovation asks something of the customer: time, attention, data, money, or behavioral change. Trust determines whether customers are willing to pay that cost. Organizations with strong brand equity start every innovation initiative with a credit balance. Those without it must pay upfront.

This is why innovation portfolios should be evaluated not only for financial return, but for their impact on trust. Some innovations generate revenue while quietly depleting brand equity.

Case Study One: Apple’s Trust-Driven Category Creation

Apple’s expansion into new categories has consistently benefited from deep customer trust. Users expect intuitive design, ecosystem coherence, and a degree of privacy stewardship. These expectations reduce hesitation when Apple introduces unfamiliar products.

Importantly, Apple reinforces trust through disciplined execution. When innovations fall short, the company responds quickly, preserving confidence. The result is an innovation engine fueled by credibility rather than hype.

When Innovation Outpaces Integrity

Organizations often damage trust by prioritizing speed over integrity. Dark patterns, hidden fees, and overpromising undermine brand equity even when innovations succeed financially.

Human-centered innovation recognizes that long-term value depends on consistency between intent and impact. Trust cannot be retrofitted after disappointment.

Case Study Two: Patagonia’s Trust Compounding Model

Patagonia has deliberately chosen growth paths that align with its environmental values. Innovations in recycled materials, product repair, and resale reinforce its purpose rather than dilute it.

Because customers trust Patagonia’s motivations, they embrace innovations that might otherwise face resistance. Trust compounds when actions consistently match words.

Operationalizing Brand Trust

Trust is built through systems, not slogans. Incentives, governance, and decision rights must reinforce customer-centric behavior. Employees are the primary interface between strategy and experience.

Organizations that operationalize trust design innovation processes that ask a simple question early and often: does this strengthen or spend brand equity?

Innovation as Stewardship

The most resilient innovators act as stewards of trust. They invest it intentionally, protect it fiercely, and replenish it through transparency and accountability.

In markets defined by skepticism, trust is not a soft advantage. It is a strategic one.

Conclusion

Brand equity is not what customers say about you when innovation is working. It is what they believe when something goes wrong. Organizations that understand this use trust as a catalyst, not a commodity.

In the future of innovation, customer trust will be the rarest and most valuable currency.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean to treat trust as currency?

It means recognizing that trust enables innovation and must be invested carefully and replenished through consistent experiences.

How can organizations measure brand equity beyond awareness?

By tracking customer confidence, willingness to try new offerings, and tolerance for change.

Who owns customer trust inside an organization?

Everyone. Trust is shaped by leadership decisions, employee behavior, and operational consistency.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Art of Watching What People Do, Not What They Say

Leave a reply

Observational Research

LAST UPDATED: December 16, 2025 at 3:10PM

The Art of Watching What People Do, Not What They Say

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In the quest for true innovation, most organizations fall prey to one fatal flaw: they rely too heavily on explicit feedback. They ask customers, “What do you want?” or “What would you pay?” The result is incremental change, not disruption. The truth is that people are often terrible predictors of their future behavior and frequently rationalize their current habits. If Henry Ford had only asked customers what they wanted, they would have requested a faster, more comfortable horse. The key to discovering latent needs — the unmet desires people don’t even know they have—lies in the deliberate practice of Observational Research.

Observational research, or ethnography, is the bedrock of Human-Centered Innovation. It requires innovators to step out of the boardroom and into the context of the user’s real life, watching them interact with products, processes, and environments. This discipline is essential because it allows us to identify the workarounds, friction points, and gaps that people endure but never articulate. We must unlearn the reliance on surveys and focus groups and embrace the art of the silent witness.

The Three-Step Framework for Observational Insight

Effective observation is not passive looking; it is structured, intentional work built around three core questions:

1. Watch for the Workarounds

A workaround is the user’s innovation—a creative, often frustrating, solution they implement when a product or process fails them. These are not flaws in the user; they are flaws in the design. Watching a warehouse worker bypass a safety protocol to save 30 seconds, or seeing an employee email a critical file instead of using the complex mandated CRM system, reveals deep systemic pain. The workaround identifies a true point of friction and points directly to the highest-value innovation opportunity.

2. Identify the Unspoken “Jobs to Be Done”

The “Jobs to Be Done” framework, popularized by Clayton Christensen, suggests people don’t buy products; they hire them to perform a specific job. Observation helps us understand the true job. A person buying a drill isn’t hiring it for the drill itself; they are hiring it to create a hole. But why do they need the hole? Maybe it’s to hang a family photo. The job is creating memories or status, not drilling. Observation helps us move beyond the functional job to the deeper emotional and social job.

3. Look for Environmental and Emotional Triggers

Context is everything. We must observe the environment — the lighting, the noise level, the interruptions — and the emotional state — frustration, confusion, momentary relief — of the user as they perform a task. If a user only uses a service when they are stressed and under a tight deadline, the innovation must prioritize speed and cognitive ease, regardless of their stated preferences in a calm interview setting. Observing the emotional cycle provides the empathy needed for human-centered design.

Case Study 1: The Kitchen Counter Conundrum

Challenge: Designing a Better Home Organization System

A major home goods retailer (“HomeLife”) consistently received high survey scores for their kitchen storage products, yet sales growth was stagnant. Focus groups praised the products’ features, but the underlying customer behavior was still chaotic. They wanted to understand why customers consistently failed to maintain a tidy kitchen.

Observational Intervention: Deep Contextual Inquiry

A small ethnographic team spent a week observing five families in their homes, focusing on the five minutes after they arrived home and the five minutes before leaving. They watched not just the kitchen, but the landing strip — the kitchen counter and adjacent areas.

Observation: They saw that every family member, without exception, dropped keys, mail, phones, and wallets directly onto the counter as the default transition point. The existing organization products were in cabinets, requiring effort and a conscious choice to use them.
Unspoken Need: The job to be done was not “storage” but “frictionless triage” — a system that managed immediate incoming clutter at the point of entry.

The Innovation Impact:

HomeLife stopped innovating inside the cabinets. They created a new line of “Landing Zone” organizers — attractive, open-faced trays and charging stations designed to live permanently on the counter, managing the immediate daily dump. This product line became their fastest-growing category, proving that solving the observed habit was more powerful than meeting the stated desire for more efficient hidden storage.

Case Study 2: Re-engineering the Healthcare Workflow

Challenge: High Administrative Error Rates in Patient Intake

A large hospital system (“HealthPath”) faced continuous, costly errors during patient intake. Nurses and administrators complained in interviews that the software was slow and complex, leading the IT department to recommend a costly software overhaul.

Observational Intervention: Silent Shadowing

A Human-Centered Innovation team chose to silently shadow nurses and intake staff for full shifts, documenting every mouse click, every sigh, and every manual note taken outside the system. They were looking for the workarounds.

Observation: The team discovered that the nurses rarely used the “slow and complex” patient history tabs during intake. Instead, they quickly printed the old, paper patient history forms, scribbled updates by hand during the interview, and only entered the minimum required data into the new software hours later.
The Friction: The real bottleneck wasn’t the software speed; it was the nurses’ need for quick, physical access to cross-reference data while simultaneously making eye contact with the patient. The software forced sequential digital entry, which contradicted the natural conversational flow.

The Innovation Impact:

HealthPath avoided the expensive software replacement. Instead, they implemented a cheap, innovative solution: the software was updated to include a “Quick View” contextual panel that displayed the most recent four critical patient history points on a separate, simplified screen. This allowed nurses to maintain flow and quickly verify key facts. The error rate dropped by 28% in three months, proving that human-centered observation leads to surgical, low-cost solutions, not just massive overhauls.

Conclusion: The Observational Mandate

The innovation mandate in the 21st century is clear: stop interviewing for validation and start observing for revelation. Observational research is your empathy engine. It forces you to move beyond the clean, rational world people describe in an interview and into the messy, emotional reality of their daily struggles. By systematically looking for workarounds, unspoken jobs, and environmental triggers, you shift your entire organization from merely responding to complaints to proactively solving the invisible problems of your users. This is the difference between incremental improvement and Human-Centered Disruption. The greatest insights are rarely spoken; they are shown.

“If you truly want to understand why people don’t use your solution, you must watch them live without it.” — Braden Kelley

Frequently Asked Questions About Observational Research

1. What is the key difference between observational research and an interview?

An interview captures what people say they do, often filtered by memory, social desirability, or self-rationalization. Observational research captures what people actually do in their natural context, revealing unconscious habits, workarounds, and friction points that are rarely articulated.

2. What is “latent need” and how does observation help find it?

A latent need is an unmet desire or problem that a user is not aware of or has simply learned to live with. Observation finds it by highlighting the user’s constant frustration or workaround, which they have normalized. The innovator sees the workaround and realizes the latent need is a superior, non-existent solution.

3. What is the biggest bias to avoid during observational research?

The biggest bias to avoid is the confirmation bias — seeing only what confirms your existing hypothesis about the problem. A good observer must practice suspending judgment and documenting everything, even behaviors that seem unrelated or counter-intuitive, to ensure the discovery of a truly novel insight.

Your first step into observational research: Take one hour next week to silently observe an employee or a customer interacting with your most critical process. Do not speak. Simply document every point where they pause, sigh, or deviate from the intended path. Use those observations, not their stated problems, to define your next innovation project.

Image credit: Pixabay

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.