Tag Archives: GM

Lifelong Learning as a Business Imperative

Investing in Your People’s Future

Lifelong Learning as a Business Imperative

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

In an era of unprecedented technological advancement and market disruption, the skills that made a company successful yesterday are not enough to guarantee its survival tomorrow. The traditional model of a single, intensive education followed by a career of static application is obsolete. The most forward-thinking, resilient organizations understand that lifelong learning is no longer a personal preference—it’s a critical business imperative. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I argue that investing in your people’s continuous growth is the most powerful strategy for building a future-proof, adaptable, and innovative enterprise. It’s a shift from viewing training as a cost center to seeing learning as a core driver of business value.

The pace of change, from the rise of AI to the evolution of global supply chains, demands a workforce that is not just skilled, but learnable. This means cultivating a culture where curiosity is celebrated, experimentation is encouraged, and continuous skill development is woven into the very fabric of daily work. By empowering employees to become perpetual learners, organizations gain a profound competitive advantage. They build a well of internal expertise, boost employee engagement and retention, and, most importantly, create the intellectual flexibility necessary to pivot and innovate in the face of uncertainty.

Why Continuous Learning is Your Best Strategic Investment

Viewing lifelong learning as a strategic business function unlocks several key benefits:

  • Enhanced Adaptability and Agility: A workforce that is constantly learning is inherently more adaptable. They can quickly acquire new skills, embrace new technologies, and pivot their roles as market demands shift, making the entire organization more agile.
  • Innovation from Within: When employees are empowered to learn and experiment, they are more likely to generate innovative ideas and solutions from the ground up. New knowledge fuels new perspectives, leading to breakthrough products, services, and processes.
  • Improved Employee Retention & Engagement: Investing in your people’s growth sends a powerful message: “We value you, and we are committed to your future here.” This recognition is a primary driver of employee loyalty, reducing turnover and making the company a magnet for top talent.
  • Building a Knowledge Repository: As employees acquire new skills and share their knowledge, the organization’s collective intelligence grows. This creates a valuable internal resource that reduces reliance on expensive external consultants and provides a source of competitive advantage.
  • Closing the Skills Gap: Instead of struggling to hire for specialized roles in a tight labor market, organizations can proactively upskill their existing workforce, building the capabilities they need from the inside out.

“The greatest investment a company can make is not in technology, but in the human capacity to understand, use, and create with that technology.”

Practical Steps to Cultivate a Learning Culture

Creating a culture of lifelong learning requires more than just offering a training budget. It demands a systemic approach from leadership:

  1. Lead by Example: Leaders must visibly engage in their own learning journeys, sharing what they’ve learned and modeling a growth mindset.
  2. Allocate Dedicated Time: Make learning a formal part of the workday. Allow employees a set number of hours per week or month to dedicate to self-directed learning, online courses, or workshops.
  3. Create a Learning Ecosystem: Provide access to a diverse range of learning resources, including online platforms (Coursera, LinkedIn Learning), mentorship programs, and internal knowledge-sharing sessions.
  4. Measure & Reward Learning: Track and celebrate the acquisition of new skills. Tie learning milestones to career progression and performance reviews, showing that continuous growth is a valued part of the job.
  5. Encourage Experimentation: Create psychologically safe spaces for employees to apply new knowledge to real-world projects, even if they fail. This hands-on application solidifies learning.

Case Study 1: AT&T’s Workforce 2020 Program – Proactive Reskilling

The Challenge:

In the mid-2010s, AT&T’s core business was shifting dramatically from a legacy phone company to a software-driven, digital services provider. The company’s vast workforce, many with expertise in traditional telecom infrastructure, lacked the skills needed for this new era of 5G, AI, and cloud computing. The alternative—mass layoffs and a massive new hiring effort—was both costly and demoralizing.

The Learning-Driven Solution:

Instead of a reactive approach, AT&T launched a massive, proactive reskilling initiative called “Workforce 2020.” The program was designed to preemptively train employees in the skills the company would need in the future. They partnered with universities and online learning platforms to create a learning ecosystem that allowed employees to self-direct their education.

  • Investment in People: AT&T committed over $250 million a year to the program, signaling a profound investment in its existing workforce.
  • Data-Driven Approach: They used data analytics to forecast future skill needs, allowing employees to choose from courses and certifications that were directly relevant to the company’s strategic direction.
  • Cultivating a New Mindset: The program was more than just training; it was about fostering a culture of continuous learning and growth, making employees the drivers of their own professional development.

The Result:

AT&T successfully reskilled tens of thousands of employees, transforming its workforce from one with legacy skills to one fluent in the language of the digital age. This initiative not only saved the company millions in recruitment and onboarding costs but also dramatically improved employee morale and retention. It proved that a large, established enterprise could successfully navigate a monumental shift by making a strategic bet on its people’s capacity for lifelong learning.


Case Study 2: General Motors and the Future of Automotive – From Manufacturing to Mobility

The Challenge:

General Motors (GM) is at the epicenter of a major disruption: the shift from internal combustion engines to electric and autonomous vehicles. This requires a completely new set of skills in software engineering, battery technology, data science, and AI—skills that are not traditionally core to a legacy automaker’s workforce. The challenge was to bridge this massive skills gap to become a leader in the new mobility landscape.

The Learning-Driven Solution:

GM recognized that it couldn’t simply hire its way out of this problem. They embarked on a comprehensive upskilling and reskilling journey for their global workforce. They partnered with leading tech companies and academic institutions to provide training in critical areas. Key elements included:

  • Internal Knowledge Transfer: Creating programs for knowledge sharing between seasoned engineers and new software experts, blending deep domain expertise with cutting-edge tech skills.
  • Role Reinvention: Encouraging employees to envision new roles for themselves within the company, providing them with the educational resources to make that transition.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Collaborating with platforms like Udacity to launch nanodegree programs in areas like self-driving car engineering, directly targeting the skills needed for GM’s future.

The Result:

By investing in its people’s lifelong learning, GM has been able to accelerate its transition from a car manufacturer to a mobility company. The company has retained valuable institutional knowledge while acquiring new, critical skills from within. This has not only reduced the skills gap but also built a culture of innovation and adaptability that is essential for competing with agile tech companies entering the automotive space. GM’s success in this transition is a powerful testament to the idea that the workforce you have today can become the workforce you need tomorrow, with the right investment in learning.


Conclusion: The Ultimate Competitive Advantage

In a world where technology and markets are in a state of perpetual flux, the most resilient organizations will be those that prioritize continuous learning. Lifelong learning is not a perk; it is a fundamental business imperative and the ultimate competitive advantage. It’s an investment that pays dividends in adaptability, innovation, and long-term viability.

As leaders, our most critical role is to stop seeing our workforce as a fixed asset and start treating them as an infinite source of potential. By creating a culture that celebrates and enables continuous growth, we not only future-proof our organizations but also empower our people to thrive in a world that is constantly changing. It’s a win-win: we build a more resilient business, and our employees build a more relevant and fulfilling career. It’s time to make learning a cornerstone of our strategy, not an afterthought.

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Dumping Facebook Ads the Obvious Choice for GM

Dumping Facebook Ads the Obvious Choice for GMThe twittersphere erupted with news of GM’s announcement that it was refusing to pay for 2013 Super Bowl advertisements and $10 Million worth of advertising on Facebook.

Much of the popular press and self-proclaimed social media experts are jumping on the bandwagon and calling GM “idiots” for ending their advertising of Facebook and talking about how GM “doesn’t get” social media. If you listen to the amount of noise out there you would think that there was consensus that GM was wrong in making these moves.

I disagree. GM is making the right move.

Companies need to re-think how they spend money on marketing and advertising to make money in the showroom. Traditional advertising is becoming more expensive all the time and as the saying goes “I know I’m wasting half of the money I spend on advertising, only I don’t know which half.” The key here is that with advertising you pay to blast everyone that sees it with a single message – including people who just bought what you sell and those who will never buy what you sell just to hit the people who are considering a purchase of what you sell. As a result it is expensive and nearly impossible to place the right message with the right people at the time (and only those people). So I am not surprised at all that GM is re-evaluating its advertising spend, possibly investing more (not less) in the future in social media. Done well, you can be more impactful with pull marketing and social media than you can with push marketing and advertising.

So, personally it seems odd to me that so-called social media experts are in favor of a company spending money advertising on social networks. Wouldn’t it be smarter for them to advocate that GM spend money on build an interactive, engagement-driving social media campaign instead of spending money on advertising?

Something like the Chevy Game Time App?

Wait a minute, did the same company that doesn’t “get social media” launch an app built by hometown company – Detroit Labs – before Super Bowl 2012 that rocketed into the Top 10 free apps for the iPhone on Apple’s App Store (a top 10 that included Facebook and Instagram)?

“For all intents and purposes, all of the expectations that we had and that GM had were far exceeded… in a positive way!”

– Henry Balanon, Detroit Labs Co-Founder

Hmmmm…

First let’s be clear. Social networks and social media are two separate things, but people talk about them as is if they were one thing.

A social network is a place where people connect online and interact, whereas social media is content that is created to be shared. But, many so-called social media experts confuse the two, and confuse advertising with social media too. Advertising on a social network is not a social media strategy – it’s still advertising. Identifying the content that you should place on your Facebook page or other digital destination and creating a reason for people to tell others that they should come to that digital destination, well that’s a social media strategy.

Pre-Order Nine Innovation Roles Group Diagnostic Tool

Now, I must disclose that I specialize in helping companies creating pull marketing strategies to drive an increase in inbound sales leads by researching the customer purchasing journey online and then helping them attract and engage customers, partners, or employees by placing the right content in the right places at the right time. Part of this is achieved by using my proprietary single content input, multiple content output methodology and yes, that sometimes includes using social media. But social media is a tool not a religion, and it needs to be used only when appropriate.

I think GM made the right call in ceasing to advertise on the Super Bowl and Facebook and here’s why:

  1. Super Bowl advertisements are expensive and for GM much of the cost is allocated against people who will probably NEVER buy a GM car
  2. Facebook advertising is not very prominent or engaging
  3. Their Chevy Game Time App experience should have given GM an idea that next year they can drive huge engagement during the Super Bowl (without advertising)

If GM is so clueless at social media, then why does the Facebook page for Chevrolet look so much better than the Facebook page for Ford or Toyota or Dodge. Honda is the only one I looked at amongst the car companies that had a more social feel at first glance, oh and Honda has the most likes of these companies too – go figure. But the engagement of people on Facebook around these brands is tiny in comparison to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Harley-Davidson – both in terms of the numbers of likes and the number of people talking about them.

So, yes GM still has things to learn about engaging on social media (and about building better products too), but then so does every company. Social media and pull marketing are two new tools in the toolbox for every CMO, brand manager, and product marketer, but as long as we all continue to instrument for learning, as marketers we will continue to get better at utilizing these new tools to attract, engage, and retain the people who will love our products and services as much as we do.

Keep innovating!

Build a Common Language of Innovation

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.