Tag Archives: design thinking workshops

Collaborative Design: Involving Users in Development

Why Collaborative Design is No Longer Optional

The shift from a product-centric to a human-centric approach is not a trend; it’s an imperative. Digital transformation, increased competition, and heightened customer expectations mean that intuitive, valuable, and delightful user experiences are the bedrock of success. Collaborative design achieves this by:

Reducing Risk: Early user involvement helps identify flaws, unmet needs, and potential pain points long before significant investment is made, saving costly rework and potential failure.
Increasing Adoption & Satisfaction: When users feel a sense of ownership and contribution, they are far more likely to embrace and advocate for the final product, leading to higher customer satisfaction scores and potentially increased market share.
Fostering Innovation: Users often present novel perspectives and unexpected use cases that internal teams might never conceive, leading to truly groundbreaking solutions.
Building Empathy: Direct interaction with users cultivates a deeper understanding of their world, challenges, and aspirations within the development team.
Accelerating Time to Market: By getting it right the first time, or at least closer to right, iterations become more focused, streamlining the development cycle and reducing overall development costs.

Putting Collaborative Design into Practice

So, how do organizations effectively integrate users into their design process? It starts with a mindset shift and then moves into adopting practical methodologies. Critically, selecting a diverse and representative sample of users is vital, and maintaining their engagement through transparent communication and recognizing their contributions ensures long-term commitment.

Empathy Mapping & Persona Creation: Before building anything, deeply understand who your users are. Workshops involving cross-functional teams and actual users can create rich, actionable personas. Modern tools like Miro or FigJam can facilitate these collaborative sessions remotely.
Co-creation Workshops: Bring users directly into brainstorming and ideation sessions. Tools like design thinking workshops, LEGO® Serious Play®, or even simple whiteboard sessions can facilitate this. Encourage a safe space for all ideas.
Prototyping & User Testing: Move beyond static mock-ups. Create low-fidelity prototypes quickly and get them into the hands of users for rapid feedback. Observe their interactions, ask open-ended questions, and iterate. Platforms like Figma or Adobe XD, coupled with user testing services, streamline this process.
Feedback Loops & Iteration: Establish continuous channels for feedback. This isn’t a one-time event; it’s an ongoing dialogue that informs continuous improvement. Agile development methodologies inherently support this iterative, user-centered approach.
Community Building: For ongoing products, foster online communities or user groups where users can share ideas, report issues, and contribute to future roadmaps, effectively becoming extended members of your innovation team.

While challenges like organizational resistance, time constraints, and managing divergent feedback can arise, they are surmountable. Start small, demonstrate early wins, and consistently communicate the tangible benefits of user involvement to build internal champions.

Case Studies in Collaborative Success

Case Study 1: Healthcare.gov (Post-Launch Fixes)

While the initial rollout of Healthcare.gov was famously problematic due to a lack of user-centered design, its subsequent turnaround serves as a powerful testament to collaborative design. After the disastrous launch, a team of tech experts, user experience designers, and government officials worked collaboratively, crucially involving real users and front-line healthcare navigators in iterative redesigns. They simplified workflows, improved navigation, and addressed pain points based on direct user feedback and testing. This collaborative effort, driven by urgent need, transformed a failing system into a functional and widely used platform, demonstrating that even significant missteps can be corrected through a focused, user-centric approach and direct user engagement.

Case Study 2: IDEO and the Shopping Cart

Perhaps one of the most famous examples of collaborative design is IDEO’s redesign of the shopping cart. Instead of just asking people what they wanted, IDEO’s designers observed shoppers, store employees, and even manufacturers interacting with existing carts. They conducted brainstorming sessions with a diverse group, including a former olympic fencer (for agility), a structural engineer, and a materials specialist. They rapidly prototyped dozens of concepts, involving potential users in hands-on testing in simulated retail environments. The result was not just an aesthetically pleasing cart, but one that addressed real-world problems like maneuverability, child safety, and ease of use for both customers and store staff, showcasing the power of diverse perspectives and rapid iteration with constant user involvement.

The Future is Co-Created

In a world where change is the only constant, the ability to adapt and evolve your offerings in lockstep with user needs is paramount. Collaborative design is not just a methodology; it’s a philosophy that empowers organizations to create solutions that are truly desired, truly useful, and ultimately, truly successful. It transforms users from passive consumers into active partners in innovation, forging stronger relationships and building products that not only meet expectations but delight and inspire. The future of innovation isn’t just about what you build, but with whom you build it. Are you ready to invite your users to the table?

Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.

Image credit: Dall-E

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Design Thinking Workshops – A Step-by-Step Guide

Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting a Design Thinking Workshop

Step 1: Empathize

Begin by understanding the users you’re designing for. Use observation, interaction, and immerse yourself in their experiences to glean insights.

Step 2: Define

Clearly articulate the problem you’re aiming to solve. This stage helps in narrowing the focus and addressing the right challenge.

Step 3: Ideate

Brainstorm a plethora of ideas without judgment. Encourage wild thinking and shelve feasibility questions. Capture as many ideas as possible.

Step 4: Prototype

Create inexpensive, scaled-down versions of the product or features to investigate what works and what doesn’t.

Step 5: Test

Test the prototypes with users. Gather feedback, refine and redefine to ensure the solution meets user needs effectively.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: Revamping Customer Experience in Banking

Challenge: A leading bank wanted to improve its customer onboarding process to enhance satisfaction and reduce drop-offs.

Approach: Through a series of Design Thinking workshops, the bank invited frontline employees to empathize with customers. They mapped the entire customer journey, pinpointing stressful pain points.

Outcome: The bank devised a simplified onboarding mobile app with real-time assistance features, slashing drop-offs by 30% within six months.

Case Study 2: Educational Tools for Remote Learning

Challenge: With the rise of remote learning, an educational publisher needed a way to keep students engaged outside traditional classrooms.

Approach: Utilizing Design Thinking workshops, the team included educators, students, and tech experts. Empathy maps were crafted to understand both teachers’ and students’ struggles.

Outcome: The team created a gamified learning platform that used interactive storytelling, resulting in a 40% increase in student engagement rates.

Conclusion

Design Thinking workshops are not just sessions, but transformational journeys that reshape perspectives and cultivate innovative solutions. When executed well, they empower organizations to not just meet, but anticipate and exceed user expectations.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Scaling Design Thinking in the Enterprise

From Workshops to Widespread Impact

LAST UPDATED: November 23, 2025 at 12:01PM

Scaling Design Thinking in the Enterprise

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

Design Thinking has become the lingua franca of modern innovation. Millions of employees globally have attended multi-day workshops, enthusiastically sticky-noted their way through empathy maps, and built rudimentary prototypes. However, for most large organizations, the enthusiasm generated in the workshop vanishes the moment employees return to their desks, colliding with entrenched silos, risk-averse processes, and a lack of executive sponsorship. The result is a common disappointment: brilliant workshops, minimal widespread impact.

The failure isn’t with Design Thinking itself; it’s with the Change Management Strategy used to scale it. We’ve treated it as a training problem when it is fundamentally a cultural and structural one. True competitive advantage comes not from having a few Design Thinking experts, but from embedding a Human-Centered Mindset into every department, from Finance to Operations, making it a routine part of daily decision-making.

Scaling Design Thinking requires a deliberate shift from the isolated “Workshop Model” to an integrated Enterprise Capability Model. It moves the focus from facilitating a methodology to engineering a culture that automatically prioritizes empathy, rapid iteration, and co-creation across all functions.

The Three Barriers to Scaling Design Thinking

Before scaling, leaders must dismantle the internal barriers that cause Design Thinking efforts to stall:

The “Innovation Theater” Trap: Treating Design Thinking as a visible, feel-good event (the workshop) rather than a rigorous, measurable business practice. This leads to team burnout when the fun activities don’t translate to real P&L impact.
The Skill Silo: Confining the practice to specific units (e.g., the Innovation Lab or UX team). When Design Thinking is seen as “someone else’s job,” functional areas like HR, Legal, or IT revert to old, process-first mindsets, resisting human-centered solutions.
The Hand-Off Hurdle: The most critical failure point is the transition from the Design Thinking team’s validated prototype (the idea) to the Operations team’s execution (the build). Without shared language and metrics, the hand-off is often rejected due to cultural dissonance as “too risky” or “not scalable.”

The Three Steps to Achieving Enterprise Capability

To move beyond these barriers, human-centered change leaders must implement a phased approach focusing on structural and cultural enablement:

1. Establish the Center of Gravity (The Design Guild)

Create a small, cross-functional internal community of practice, often called a Design Guild or Innovation Coaches Network. This group’s mission is not to run all the workshops, but to train, coach, and govern the practice across the enterprise. They codify the methodology, create standard, context-specific tools, and ensure consistency. Crucially, they serve as internal consultants, helping functional leaders translate a vague business challenge into a structured Design Thinking project that matters to their unit.

2. Integrate into Decision Metrics (Operationalizing Empathy)

The methodology must be linked directly to how the company measures and rewards behavior. This involves two actions:

First, mandate that Stage Gate Reviews for all major product, process, or system changes must include verifiable evidence of user empathy (e.g., ethnographic field notes, validated low-fidelity prototypes with customer feedback loops). Second, tie incentive and bonus programs for mid-level managers to demonstrating behavioral commitment to the methodology (e.g., actively allocating time for customer interviews, funding small-scale rapid prototyping). This ensures Design Thinking is a required part of the Process of Innovation, not just an optional tool.

3. Embed into Functional DNA (The T-Shaped Workforce)

This is the final, essential step: making Design Thinking part of every function’s core competency. Design Thinking shouldn’t be a separate skill but the horizontal bar of a T-Shaped Professional. For example, a Finance analyst should be trained not just in spreadsheets, but in how to apply Design Thinking to simplify employee expense reports. An HR leader should use Design Thinking to map the employee experience when on-boarding. This widespread application transforms the methodology from an innovation tool into a Operational Improvement Framework.

Case Study 1: The Global Manufacturer and the Core Capability

Challenge: Inconsistent Product Quality and Adoption Across Regions

A global manufacturer faced a problem common to large, successful firms: R&D invented great products, but regional operations adapted or rejected them, leading to inconsistent quality and slow market adoption. The issue wasn’t the product; it was a lack of shared empathy for the regional user’s context and constraints.

Scaling Design Thinking Intervention:

The manufacturer strategically abandoned the corporate-led workshop model and created a decentralized Design Mastery Program. Instead of bringing hundreds of employees to HQ, they identified one or two high-potential leaders in 20 different regions and certified them as Design Coaches (Step 1). These coaches were then required to dedicate 25% of their time to running local, problem-specific Design Sprints focused on regional adoption challenges (e.g., “Why is Product X adoption 40% lower in Asia than Europe?”).

Key Benefits and Characteristics:

Decentralized Ownership: Ownership shifted from a central lab to local operational leaders, integrating the methodology into the regional P&L (Step 3).
Metrics Integration: Success was measured by the regional reduction in operational friction (fewer reworks, faster local adaptation time) resulting from the Design Sprints (Step 2).
The Human-Centered Lesson: By making the coaches accountable to their regional P&L and focusing the sprints on operational pain points, Design Thinking quickly became indispensable, transforming from a “nice-to-have” training to a core operational capability driving tangible efficiency gains and better user adoption.

Case Study 2: The Healthcare Insurer and the Back Office

Challenge: Employee Churn and Administrative Cost in Claims Processing

A large healthcare insurer suffered from extremely high employee turnover in its claims processing centers, which drove high costs and error rates. Management assumed the problem was pay or management style, but the root cause was systemic complexity (the “internal user experience”). Design Thinking was initially only used on customer-facing digital tools.

Scaling Design Thinking Intervention:

The insurer created a dedicated Process Innovation Team led by internal Design Thinking coaches (Step 1). Their mandate was to apply the Design Thinking methodology not to the customer, but to the employee journey (the internal user). Teams from Legal, Compliance, and IT were forced to sit with claims processors and literally map their daily tasks, focusing on points of frustration (the internal user’s empathy map).

Key Benefits and Characteristics:

Horizontal Application: The methodology was applied horizontally across traditionally siloed functions (HR, IT, Legal), forcing them to co-create solutions focused on the processor’s experience (Step 3).
Metric Shift: The success metric was shifted from “Claims Processed per Hour” to “Reduction in Processor Frustration Score (PFS),” derived from employee feedback post-sprint (Step 2).
The Human-Centered Lesson: By applying the empathy phase to internal employees, the teams discovered complex legacy system hurdles that wasted 40% of the processors’ time. The solutions co-created by the teams led to a 35% reduction in employee churn in those centers within a year, demonstrating the massive ROI of applying Design Thinking to the internal user experience. Design Thinking became synonymous with operational excellence, not just product innovation.

The Human-Centered Call to Action

Design Thinking is too powerful to be confined to a single team or a one-off event. It is the necessary framework for continuous, human-centered change. To achieve widespread impact, leaders must recognize that they are not buying a training session; they are engineering a culture of pervasive empathy and experimentation.

The scaling challenge is not a logistical one, but a leadership one. Are you ready to shift resources and rewards to make this methodology a non-negotiable part of how every function, from the front line to the back office, makes decisions?

“If Design Thinking is isolated to the innovation lab, your company is only doing innovation theater. True innovation happens when empathy becomes a non-negotiable pursuit for the whole enterprise.” — Braden Kelley

Frequently Asked Questions About Scaling Design Thinking

1. What is the biggest mistake organizations make when trying to scale Design Thinking?

The biggest mistake is treating Design Thinking as purely a training problem (the “Workshop Model”) rather than a cultural and structural change management challenge. This leads to isolated enthusiasm that quickly fades when confronted with risk-averse processes and a lack of accountability in daily work.

2. What is the role of the “Design Guild” in scaling the methodology?

The Design Guild serves as the internal center of gravity. Its role is not to run every workshop, but to standardize the methodology, certify and coach internal practitioners across functions, and govern the quality of the practice, ensuring consistency and integration into strategic projects enterprise-wide.

3. How do you measure the impact of Design Thinking beyond product innovation?

Impact must be measured using operational metrics tied to the specific problem being solved. For back-office functions, this can include metrics like “Reduction in Employee Frustration Score,” “Decrease in Process Cycle Time,” “Reduction in Rework,” or “Time Saved on Cross-Functional Handoffs.” The key is measuring the reduction of friction for the user, whether internal or external.

Your first step toward scaling Design Thinking: Identify a high-impact, non-product challenge in a back-office function (e.g., HR on-boarding, finance expense reporting, legal compliance documentation). Partner with the leader of that function and commit to running one small, highly focused Design Sprint to address the internal user experience of that process. Focus the success metric on reducing internal employee friction, not saving cost. Use this success story to model Design Thinking as a powerful operational tool, not just an innovation toy.

Image credit: Pexels

Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.