DMAIC for Innovation

DMAIC for InnovationBelow is a rough draft of an article I wrote for the current issue iSixSigma magazine – to see the finished version – subscribe here.

Can the popular Six Sigma framework be adapted to look at innovation?

Much has been written about how a formal Six Sigma approach and a formal approach to innovation cannot co-exist. But is that really true?

On the surface these two formal approaches personify the natural tension between exploitation and exploration activities within any organization. Six Sigma is generally thought of as an exploitation activity, while innovation is usually associated with exploration. When I speak of exploitation, I’m not speaking of child labor and deforestation, but of optimizing the transformation of organization’s inputs into profitable outputs under its existing business model. And when I speak of exploration, I’m referring to the organization’s efforts to pursue new potential business models, new product or service areas, or both.

Let’s look back before we look forward.

Continue reading the rest of this article on Innovation Excellence

About Braden Kelley

Braden Kelley is a Human-Centered Design, Innovation and Transformation consultant, a popular innovation speaker, workshop leader, and creator of the Human-Centered Change™ methodology. He is the author of Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire from John Wiley & Sons and Charting Change from Palgrave Macmillan. Braden has been advising companies since 1996, while living and working in England, Germany, and the United States. Braden is a US Navy veteran and earned his MBA from top-rated London Business School. Follow him on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram.
This entry was posted in collaboration, Innovation, Management and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to DMAIC for Innovation

  1. Pingback: Six Sigma versus Innovation | Braden Kelley

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *