LAST UPDATED: November 30, 2025 at 7:32PM
GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato
In the age of exponential change, organizations are suffocated not by a lack of information, but by an abundance of obsolete information. Every firm champions Continuous Learning — the idea that employees must constantly acquire new skills. Yet, few acknowledge that the space in our cognitive and organizational structures is finite. New knowledge cannot take root if the old, comfortable certainties are still occupying the ground.
This is where the Skill of Unlearning becomes paramount. Unlearning is not about forgetting; it’s about choosing to discard the relevance of previously successful mental models and organizational processes that are no longer fit for the current context. It is the conscious, human-centered decision to create cognitive capacity for the new, disruptive ideas necessary for survival.
Unlearning is a strategic necessity. If you cannot unlearn the operating principles of the last decade, you will apply last decade’s solutions to this decade’s problems, and you will fail not from a lack of effort, but from a failure of release.
The Unlearning Imperative: Removing the Ruts of Success
The biggest blocker to unlearning is often past success. When a strategy or process works brilliantly for ten years, it hardens into dogma. This dogma creates three primary barriers that must be addressed through human-centered change:
1. The Organizational Identity Barrier
Many firms derive their identity from their history (“We are the best analog camera manufacturer,” or “We are the best provider of physical media”). When the market shifts, employees struggle to let go of the core competency that defined their professional value. Unlearning requires redefining the organizational mission from what we produce to what problem we solve for the customer, regardless of the technology.
2. The Procedural Rigidity Barrier
The “way we’ve always done things” acts as concrete, resisting new methodologies (e.g., trying to implement Agile development using a rigid waterfall budgeting process). Unlearning requires disrupting the processes that reward the old behavior. You can’t learn radical new product development if the budget cycle punishes every failed experiment. The process itself must be unlearned.
3. The Cognitive Comfort Barrier
For individuals, unlearning is emotionally taxing. It means admitting that a skill they spent decades mastering is now worth less than a skill they don’t yet possess. Leaders must create Psychological Safety where employees are allowed to be temporarily incompetent as they transition to the new model. The fear of looking foolish is the number one killer of unlearning.
Case Study 1: The Insurance Giant and the Digital Channel Shift
Challenge: Dominance of an Obsolete Sales Channel
A large, established insurance company (“LegacyInsure”) dominated its market through a massive, highly successful network of local, commissioned agents. When digital-native competitors offered instantaneous online quotes and sign-ups, LegacyInsure lagged. The problem wasn’t a lack of digital investment; it was the cultural inability of its regional managers to unlearn the value structure of the agent-led model.
The Unlearning Intervention: Mandatory Dual Operating Models
The leadership knew forcing a sudden shift would alienate key personnel. Instead, they mandated a Dual Operating Model for three years, creating a separate, digitally-focused division with zero dependence on the agent network. Critically, regional managers were assigned metrics that rewarded both the old and the new model, forcing them to:
- Unlearn the assumption that high-touch contact was required for every sale.
- Learn to value data from self-service customers (Learning).
The Human-Centered Lesson:
By separating the models, the company created a safe space for the new to grow without being suffocated by the old, profitable dogma. The regional managers who embraced the unlearning process transitioned into roles overseeing both digital and agent channels, becoming change champions. Those who couldn’t unlearn their previous success were gently transitioned out over time. The company unlearned its channel dependency and survived the digital wave.
Case Study 2: The Software Company and the Product Pivot
Challenge: Sticking to a Feature Set That No Longer Solved the Core Problem
A B2B software firm (“FeatureSoft”) built its reputation on a product with deep, complex, and highly customizable features. However, the market had shifted to favoring simple, intuitive, cloud-based solutions (the SaaS Revolution). FeatureSoft’s engineers were resistant to the pivot; their professional identity was tied to building complexity.
The Unlearning Intervention: The ‘Kill Your Darling’ Mandate
The CEO issued a direct mandate to unlearn complexity. They created an internal innovation challenge: “Build the simplest possible version of our product that delivers 80% of the customer’s value in a pure SaaS model, using only 20% of the original codebase.” The prize was funding for the team to become the new core product unit.
- Engineers were forced to unlearn the value of complexity and mastery of the legacy code.
- They had to learn the value of abstraction and minimal viable product (MVP).
The Human-Centered Lesson:
The challenge transformed the culture. By making the act of simplifying the primary goal, the company inverted the value hierarchy. The engineers, highly intelligent and competitive, embraced the new challenge. They successfully unlearned the need for feature depth and focused on solving the core user problem elegantly, facilitating a market-saving pivot that would have been blocked by the cognitive inertia of its legacy code experts.
Mastering the Unlearning Skill
Unlearning is an active, not passive, process. It requires leadership to institutionalize rituals that challenge the status status quo:
- The Pre-Mortem: Before launching any major project, assume the project failed spectacularly two years in. Discuss what old assumption was responsible for that failure.
- The Stop Budget: Allocate a percentage of budget not to R&D, but to identifying and stopping obsolete projects, processes, and products. Reward the teams that successfully kill their own initiatives and free up resources.
- Reverse Mentoring: Mandate senior leaders be mentored by new, entry-level employees specifically on their lack of knowledge — their fresh, unburdened perspective on customer friction.
Focusing on continuous learning fills the organizational tank; mastering unlearning ensures the tank can be properly emptied and refilled. This is the ultimate skill of human-centered change.
“The measure of intelligence is the ability to change. The measure of organizational intelligence is the ability to unlearn.”
Frequently Asked Questions About the Skill of Unlearning
1. What is the fundamental difference between Unlearning and Forgetting?
Unlearning is not about forgetting information; it is the conscious, deliberate act of discarding the relevance or applicability of a previously successful mental model, process, or assumption. It’s creating space for new knowledge, while forgetting is a passive failure of memory.
2. Why is past success the biggest barrier to Unlearning?
Past success creates dogma. When a process works for a long time, it becomes an entrenched part of the organizational identity and reward system, leading to procedural and cognitive rigidity. This comfort and certainty actively resist any new information that contradicts the profitable “way we’ve always done things.”
3. What is the “Stop Budget” and why is it important for Unlearning?
A Stop Budget allocates funds specifically to identifying and terminating obsolete projects, processes, or products. It’s important because it institutionalizes the reward structure for unlearning, shifting the focus from simply starting new things to actively clearing the internal roadblocks created by the old, allowing resources and attention to be intentionally freed up.
Your first step toward mastering Unlearning: Hold an “Assumption Audit” meeting for your next major project. Before discussing the solution, have everyone write down three ‘truths’ they hold about the market or the customer based on the last five years of success. Then, for 15 minutes, debate why each of those ‘truths’ might be completely false today.
Extra Extra: Because innovation is all about change, Braden Kelley’s human-centered change methodology and tools are the best way to plan and execute the changes necessary to support your innovation and transformation efforts — all while literally getting everyone all on the same page for change. Find out more about the methodology and tools, including the book Charting Change by following the link. Be sure and download the TEN FREE TOOLS while you’re here.
Image credit: Pixabay
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.