Author Archives: Arlen Meyers

About Arlen Meyers

Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA is an emeritus professor at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, an instructor at the University of Colorado-Denver Business School and cofounding President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs at www.sopenet.org. Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ameyers/

Fundamentals of Digital Health Entrepreneurship

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Bioscientists, engineers, non-sick care entrepreneurs and health professionals have many ways to practice biomedical and clinical entrepreneurship e.g. in biopharma, medical device and diagnostics, small business medical practice, educational technologies, social entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. Digital health entrepreneurship is another pathway.

Digital health is the application of information and communications technologies to exchange medical information. Like all other areas of biomedical entrepreneurship, digital health entrepreneurs pursue opportunities with scarce resources with goal of creating user/patient/customer/stakeholder defined value through the design, development, testing, validation and deployment of digital health products and services.

In some instances, digital health products and services can be stand alone offerings, usually providing the intended user with information, a communications interface and education, that are not defined as drugs or devices and therefore not subject to regulatory clearance requirements. Some, on the other hand, become a new part of a drug or device e.g.a remote sensor in an orthopedic implant or a “smart” pill or other innovative drug delivery device.

Much like the medtech innovation roadmap, the digital health innovation roadmap has several stops along the way including :

Early stage or prototype product development, customer discovery and development and validating the parts of the business model canvas. If you don’t do his right, there is not much point in moving to the next steps. In fact, not having a viable business model is the main reason companies, including digital health companies, fail.

Design and reduction to practice using established quality system controls, including technical validation and verification

The terms Verification and Validation are commonly used in software engineering to mean two different types of analysis. The usual definitions are:

  • Validation: Are we building the right system?
  • Verification: Are we building the system right?

In other words, validation is concerned with checking that the system will meet the customer’s actual needs, while verification is concerned with whether the system is well-engineered, error-free, and so on. Verification will help to determine whether the software is of high quality, but it will not ensure that the system is useful.

The distinction between the two terms is largely to do with the role of specifications. Validation is the process of checking whether the specification captures the customer’s needs, while verification is the process of checking that the software meets the specification.

Following the appropriate regulatory approval pathway, when appropriate

Following the appropriate intellectual property protection pathway, when appropriate

Following the appropriate business model

Translational and human subjects research, when appropriate

Launch, marketing and sales 

Post market surveillance

Exit

While the path may be clear, the journey is difficult and filled with hazards. Here are some posts, blogs and commentaries that might help you find your way:

1.Here’s how digital health entrepreneurship is different from other types of biomedical and clinical entrepreneurship.

2.Here are 12 trends in physician digital health entrepreneurship.

3.Here are 10 bumps along the digital health innovation road

4.Here are 10 digital health gaps and how to close them

5.Here is how to measure your digital health cluster

6.Here is how and why we need to get real about digital health

7. Not enough bioscientists, engineers and health professionals have an entrepreneurial mindset.

8. Too many sick care entrepreneurs are problem solvers, not problem seekers

9. Here are 10 reasons why non-sick care entrepreneurs fail

10. Here are the problems with data, data everywhere.

11. T2V is the new normal

12. Why your idea is not investor ready

13. How to create a flawed business model

14. Horizon 3 sick innovation

15. When will Google be in the clinic

16. How to measure a digital health cluster

17. The elusive medical business model

18. Prototype and simulate to verify and validate

19. How to build a VAST business model

20. How to close the doctor-patient eCare gap

21. How to overcome regulatory market barriers

Digital health entrepreneurs have a big challenge. Digitizing sick care, while inevitable, has already seen its share of failed products. bad rules and dysfunctional ecosystems. Most have failed because they did not achieve the 3Vs of sick care innovation, they set the bar too low or they quit too soon.

We are in the early stages of digital health entrepreneurship , trying to figure out what works and what won’t, what rules and regulations we need and which we should revise and the impact on society and the medical profession. I have confidence that digital health entrepreneurs will get it right soon, despite the efforts of many who are getting in the way.

 

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Make it personal, but don’t take it personally

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

There are a lot of things that motivate (bio)entrepreneurs. Some come from inside (intrinsic) and others come from outside (extrinsic). Most think that it’s a good idea to have passion for your cause, product, technology or objective. Others think that that “passion” can cloud your judgement, further obscure your blind spots, and lead you to be pig headed or obstinate in the face of truth.

Creativity is what happens when mood has sex with thinking.

Sometimes, though, it is a good idea to hide your ugly side, even though that’s what keeps you going.

Many entrepreneurs create products because of personal circumstances or that of a family member. They are driven by the desire to solve a problem that eats at them and they do not want others to have to deal with same thing. Its personal.

As recently reported, when Jeff Dachis suddenly and unexpectedly learned he had Type 1 diabetes at the age of 46 in September 2013, he was stunned. After all, he ran marathons, followed a healthy diet and never had an inkling of any medical troubles during previous annual physicals.

“I went to the doctor, got about six minutes with a nurse practitioner, an insulin pen, a prescription and a pat on the back, and I was out the door,” Mr. Dachis said. “I was terrified. I had no idea what this condition was about or how to address it.”

Feeling confused and scared, he decided to leverage his expertise in digital marketing, technology and big data analytics to create a company, One Drop, that helps diabetics understand and manage their disease.

The One Drop system combines sensors, an app, and a Bluetooth glucose meter to track and monitor a diabetic’s blood glucose levels, food, exercise and medication. It uses artificial intelligence to predict the person’s blood glucose level over the next 24 hours and even suggests ways the person can control fluctuations, such as walking or exercising to offset high sugar levels — or eating a candy bar to raise low glucose levels. Users can also text a diabetes coach with questions in real time.

Patient entrepreneurs join engineers, healthcare professionals and service providers leading the 4th sick care industrial revolution.

Fundamentally, entrepreneurs are driven by emotions, not thinking. At its core, it is about feelers who happen to think . The range of emotions can be encyclopedic, or they can be reduced to a few categories.

No alt text provided for this image

Of course, describing an emotion and the triggers that evoke it and the entrepreneurial behaviors, be they constructive or desctructive, that result are the lore of capitalism.

On the other hand, they have to maintain an objective distance from the realities they confront. It is a common mistake to have blind spots when creating and running a business. They can’t take it personally.

When entrepreneurs face the inevitable rejection, here’s how they cope with it.

One of the enduring factors in creating an agile and innovative business is purpose. Purpose answers the question: why do we do what we do? It gives a sense of determination to your ambition and direction. It gives a different flavour to your work then a vision, mission or strategy. To me a vision provides a point on the horizon, the guiding light for your ambition. A mission directs the task that will lead you to your vision. And a strategy is a process or road map to realize your vision.

Entrepreneurial psychopathology is a fickle beast. Controlling what drives you, accepting the truth and not letting it get the best of you is a key part of entrepreneurial emotional intelligence. Be sure you know the difference when you feel it.

and Co-editor at Digital Health Entrepreneurship

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Mentors, Sponsors, Coaches and Colleagues Help with Burnout

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Physician burnout is pervasive and appears to be worsening. In fact, in some specialties, residents are burned out even before they have spent their first day in practice. But, they are not alone since burnout happens in many industries other than medicine.

Burnout is considered to have a range of symptoms. There is no agreement which of those are part of it and which ones are not. But all definitions given so far have in common that the symptoms are regarded as being the consequence of stressful activities in or outside the job. One possible source of stress outside the job is caring for a family member, for example.

Three main areas of symptoms are considered to be signs of burnout syndrome:

  • Emotional exhaustion: People affected feel drained and exhausted, overloaded, tired and low, and do not have enough energy. Physical symptoms include pain or problems with the stomach or bowel.
  • Alienation from (job-related) activities: People affected find their jobs increasingly negative and frustrating. They may develop a cynical attitude towards their work environment and their colleagues. They may, at the same time, increasingly distance themselves emotionally, and disengage themselves from their work.
  • Reduced performance: Burnout mainly affects everyday tasks at work, at home or when caring for family members. People with burnout regard their activities very negatively, find it hard to concentrate, are listless and experience a lack of creativity.

Burnout can also be described as “the extinction of motivation or incentive, especially where one’s devotion to a cause or relationship fails to produce the desired results,” and is a stress-related state and there are multiple causes.

Burn out interventions and prevention programs both at the personal and organizational level are successful 80% of the time. However, both personal and organizational interventions are better than either alone, and the results tend to fatigue over time.

Mentors, coaches, sponsors and colleagues might help, but , you need to understand the roles each one plays and when and how to engage them. Here is what to do when your boss refuses to be your sponsor.

Mentors are accountability partners who help you stay on track to meet your goals. They are hard to find and the lack of a mentor is an oft quoted reason for entrepreneurial failure. Many entrepreneurs have a hard time finding the right mentor for various reasons. Mentors help your personal development.

Here are some tips on being a good mentor. It starts with building a genuine relationship.

Sponsors are different from mentors. Their job is to run cover for you in your organization and help you find the scarce resources intrapreneurs need to succeed. They are making an investment in your idea, and, like every investor, they expect a return within a defined time.

They are also called “rabbis” and you should find and be one yourself. Many who consider themselves to be sponsors are acting more like mentors. To claim the title of sponsor, a senior leader should be an active advocate for their protégé — a more junior professional who the sponsor sees as a top performer, with tons of potential, who deserves to move up in their career. A sponsor has three primary responsibilities: to believe in and go out on a limb for their protégé; to use their organizational capital, both publicly and behind closed doors, to push for their protégé’s promotion; and to provide their protégé with “air cover” for risk-taking.

Colleagues are people you work with that you admire and can emulate. They are not friends, but rather a honest sounding board. They set an example by their actions. There are many reasons why colleagues make good mentors or confidantes.

Coaches The goal of the coach is to facilitate learning, focus, and results. Coaches are trained in the strategies for achieving the results specific to their domain of coaching. Although they may not have experience generating the results you are looking for in themselves, they should have experience generating these results in other people or organizations. Coaches teach you a skill.

Many of you who are reading this don’t have a mentor. But, here are some ways to change that.

Here are some best practices for mentors and mentees.

You might be a member of the miserable professional class. Whether you are an employed physician, a community practitioner, a budding CEO of a biomedical or health startup or an intrapreneur, you need help as an antidote to the stress. Take the time to cultivate the right relationship with the right person in the right role and thank your lucky stars you found them.

 

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Fundamentals of medtech biodesign and commercialization

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Much like drug development and commercialization, medical device design, development and commercialization follows a defined pathway to patients. While less expensive and less time consuming than getting a drug to market, getting a device to market requires the same regulatory, IP, market-product mix, reimbursement and business model rigor.

Here’s the secret sauce, at least according the director of the Stanford Biodesign Program.

There are several differences between biomedical (biopharma and medtech) innovation compared to clinical innovation.

Here are the Cliff’s Notes. Read them before reading the rest of this article. Yes, it will take more than the usual 2 minutes to read the post so prepare yourself.

Now, let’s move on.

Here are the stages:

Understanding customer needs and designing a product to satisfy them

Here’s how to do that

Biodesign: Once you have identified a customer need and created a solution to solve their problem, reducing an idea to practice involves following the standards set by international regulatory agencies. An investigational device exemption (IDE) allows the investigational device to be used in a clinical study in order to collect safety and effectiveness data. Clinical studies are most often conducted to support a PMA. Only a small percentage of 510(k)s require clinical data to support the application. Investigational use also includes clinical evaluation of certain modifications or new intended uses of legally marketed devices. All clinical evaluations of investigational devices, unless exempt, must have an approved IDE before the study is initiated.

For more information about how to get an IDE, go to the FDA website.

Here are the parts of the design control process.

Creating a prototype is one thing. Being able to manufacture it at scale is another. Here are the issues and some caveats.

Following the appropriate regulatory approval pathway: There are two primary pathways for medical device clearance or approval-the 510(k) pathway or the PMA (premarket approval) pathway. 

Medical devices that do not require FDA review before the devices are marketed are considered “510(k) exempt.” These medical devices are mostly low-risk, Class I devices and some Class II devices that have been determined not to require a 510(k) (named for a section in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.

These devices are exempt from complying with premarket notification requirements subject to the limitations on exemptions; however, they are not exempt from certain general controls. For example, 510(k) exempt devices must

  • be suitable for their intended use
  • be adequately packaged and properly labeled
  • have establishment registration and device listing forms on file with FDA
  • be manufactured under a quality system (with the exception of a small number of class I devices that are subject only to complaint files and general recordkeeping requirements)

Premarket approval (PMA) is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices. Class III devices are those that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury.

Here are 10 regulatory traps that kill valuation.

Did you know that 69 percent of 510(k) submissions were rejected the first time between January and June of 2015? Here are some tips to prevent that from happening.

Here is a useful link describing the differences between the US and European clearance processes.

Getting a CPT code, coverage and enough payment to generate a profit

Translational and human subjects research

Launch, marketing and sales after regulatory clearance: Medtech, like biopharma, is facing many challenges that is forcing them to reconsider their business models and sales and marketing approach.

Here are some differences between marketing and selling drugs and marketing and selling devices.

Post market surveillance: Here are the requirements

Here is the milestone map for developing a medical device.

In some instances, your product might be a hybrid of a drug and a device and a digital health product. Having such a combined product has a somewhat different pathway. Here are the basics.

For every stage of device development, there are career opportunities for biomedical, engineering and medical entrepreneurs and ways to add value.

You will also need to have partners and service provider relationships to help you. Here are the main ones. Don’t forget your reimbursement strategy.

Here are 5 Steps To Faster-To-Market, More Profitable Medical Devices

Here is my list of the top medtech entrepreneur mistakes:

1. They don’t think they have a “device” as defined by the FDA so they forgo the process. A new category of digital therapeutics, sitting somewhere between drugs and devices, has introduced a new set of commercialization challenges

2. They don’t incorporate a reimbursement strategy from the beginning

3. They create something that is not patentable

4. They miscalculate the total addressable market

5. They don’t price the product properly

6. They start selling without a marketing or strategic communcations plan

7. They grossly underestimate the time and money it will take to sell their product

8. They create a product that is really not that much better than the competition. It just costs a whole lot more.

9. They don’t have a supply chain, sales or distribution plan

10. They don’t pay attention to quality system and good manufacturing processes

https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/PostmarketRequirements/QualitySystemsRegulations/

Here are some tips on how to work with BIG DEVICE.

Getting a device from bench to bedside to boardroom requires careful planning and execution and simultaneous efforts to minimize not just clinical risk, but regulatory, IP, market and reimbursement risk as well.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

What if Private Equity Ran Medical Schools?

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Dear Miss. Robertson,

Thank you for responding to our solicitation for a new Dean of our medical school. We are intrigued by your past experience and background in private equity. As you are well aware, things are changing quickly in sick care and the medical education establishment has been slow to adapt. You’ve no doubt heard about large healthcare companies and hospital systems being purchased for staggering sums by private equity firms.We intend to shake things up and are seriously considering alternative, non-traditional candidates like yourself.

The most recently dust up is happening in the world of dermatology, where private equity firms are buying and rolling up highly profitable practices.

Given the uncertain trajectory of basic research funding, dwindling state support for higher education, a broken medical school business model and threats to our clinical enterprise, it is clear that the model of recruiting academic triple threats that excel in research, teaching and clinical care is a dying model. Instead, we are looking for a person with a combination of leadership, entrepreneurship and innovation skills- the new triple threat.

Private equity is fixing and flipping sick care and medical services at an astounding rate and we can see why your skills should be applied to medical education.

More specifically:

  • As pressure mounts on companies to maintain top-line organic growth and sharpen focus, more are looking to sell unwanted or noncore units. In certain situations, such as to win regulatory approval for a merger, companies are required to sell some assets. Divesting makes sense for companies; our research has shown that corporates that actively reallocate capital produce total returns to shareholders of 10 percent annually, versus 6 percent for companies that reallocate only infrequently. Healthcare companies seem to be catching on. Excluding businesses that were spun out as stand-alone companies, corporate companies divested a record $115 billion of healthcare assets in 2015. The value of such divestitures was twice as high in 2013–15 as in 2010–12.
  • Price is often not the only factor in divestitures, which often require the buyer and seller to negotiate two agreements, one governing the purchase and one the transition of services. Many buyers are not equipped to manage these types of complex deals; others are unwilling. Sellers also find it preferable to move quickly toward negotiation with a single bidder. Private-equity firms skilled in managing these negotiations have an advantage. Furthermore, private-equity firms can also cultivate relationships with healthcare companies that strategic buyers (that is, other healthcare companies) would find difficult to achieve. In this way, private buyers may get a head start on divestiture opportunities and avoid a multibidder auction.
  • Many private-equity firms have capabilities well suited to transform underperforming business units into stand-alone companies and improve their finances. Active private owners can add value through effective management changes (for example, adding leaders with a proven track record of success in running healthcare companies) and establishing regular and challenging dialogue with management through a new board of directors. Private-equity firms can introduce some discipline to the capital-allocation process and help their acquisitions pivot from capital preservation to funding ambitious growth and long-term strategic bets. These could include vertical integration (as seen, for example, in the acquisition of Nordion by GTCR’s Sterigenics in 2014) or growth through highly strategic acquisitions (for example, under JLL Partners ownership, Patheon acquired a series of companies to broaden its service offerings).

Some of the possibilities we envision include:

1. Divesting our medical school from state control since they provide miniscule financial support.

2. Cut costs to the bone

3. Re-examine our tuition model

4. Explore ways to securitize the future incomes of graduates to attract investment capital

5. Recruiting a new team with skill sets compatible with our financial objectives

6. Creating IT systems and innovation management systems that add value instead of costs

7. Looking to consolidate and roll up other medical schools that share our perspective and vision

8. Focusing on supporting those who are successful instead of wasting resources on trying to rehabilitate those who clearly do not have what it takes to succeed.

9. Using private equity networks to find the executive talent we need to scale our ventures

10. Using innovative financial products, like crowd funding and other securities instruments to assure an adequate return on investment at exit.

11. Offering online courses in a certificate program designed for potential biomedical entrepreneurs and others who want a more advanced understanding of basic and clinical sciences, medical technologies, innovation opportunities and healthcare systems.

12. A special program for veterans interested in acquiring advanced skills and training funding a new version of the GI bill

13. Integrating health policy, economics, innovation and entrepreneurship into our curriculum

14. Creating a second pathway for MD’s who do not want to practice clinical medicine.

15. Replacing our current MD/MBA program with an MD/MBE program

16. Rethinking our admissions process to improve equity, diversity and inclusion to include admissions by lottery, eliminating the MCAT requirement, eliminating admission interviews and eliminating bias against those who attend community colleges or foreign medical schools.

17. Educating our students to win the 4th industrial revolution

18. Creating a cyberczar to integrate computer and data science, engineering and sick care professional programs

19. Fixing the 5 big problems we have with our medical school

20. Graduating every student with an entrepreneurial mindset

21. Being textbook free to lesson the already onerous student debt burden and take advantage of open educational resources.

We might also be interested in a divestiture,which we define as the sale of a business unit or division from a corporate parent, such as our departments of family practice or rehabilitation medicine, which have always been a drag on our earnings

To that end, you should be aware that effective next semester, we will be eliminating the 4th year of medical school in an effort to make it better, cheaper and faster. We will be eliminating “audition rotations”, cutting back on non-essential basic science course requirements, making clinical rotations mandatory in the first year and making clinical skills competency a requirement for graduation. Simply put, we are changing the 100 year old model of medical education to conform to the times.

Thank you again for your interest and we look forward to hearing your thoughts.

and C0-editor of Digital Health Entrepreneurship

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Don’t confuse passion with anger

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

There are a lot of things that motivate (bio)entrepreneurs. Some come from inside (intrinsic) and others come from outside (extrinsic). Most think that it’s a good idea to have passion for your cause, product, technology or objective. Others think that that “passion” can cloud your judgement, further obscure your blind spots, and lead you to be pig headed or obstinate in the face of truth.

The problem is that passion can cause burnout.

Truth be TOLD, most entrepreneurs can attribute their success to talent, seeing opportunities, luck and determination or grit. The source of that grit comes from satisfying some subconscious or apparent psychic need. Best case, the results are positive. Worst case, it results in entrepreneurial psychopathologies.

Anger or revenge are other entrepreneurial hot buttons. You’ve heard it before. “Don’t tell me I can’t do something”. “Success is the best revenge”. “I’ll show you”. There are many examples of people who, frustrated at work, decide to buck the system, instead of fleeing or sabatoging it, with impressive results.

Some have ruminated on the differences. Here’s my take:

1. Entrepreneurial motivation resides in three places: the head (cognitive), the heart (emotional responses) and the soul ( where passion resides). In the Happiness Equation, author Neil Pasricha proposes that it comes from sales, society and self. Self-satisfaction is a much stronger motivator than sales (commercial) or social (peer acceptance and validation). Self satisfaction derives from self confidence.

2. There is an anatomy and physiology for each, driven by the fight or flight stress response and hormones, mostly in your brain and your adrenal glands.

3. Your biggest strength in any of these areas can be your biggest weakness and you need to control and balance when exercising one makes sense and is in your best interest.

4. Thoughts drive emotions and emotions drive behaviors. Toxic behaviors derive from toxic thoughts.

5. In most instances, how you think and how you respond to stress are learned behaviors that can be modified

6. When someone gives a pitch and the response is “I can hear the passion in your voice”, don’t confuse that with anger, lack of emotional intelligence, or worse, a personality disorder or entrepreneurial psychopathology.

7. There is a season for everything, including rational analysis, anger and passion.

8. Behaviors and passion are contagious so be sure you quarantine them if you don’t want injurious ones to spread.

9. Trying to extinguish someone’s passion is a fool’s errand and potentially dangerous.

10. If you get angry a lot, create a space between the stimulus and the response and be mindful of the triggers.

Now, it turns out, in a movement that some experts are calling “the second wave of positive psychology,” many psychologists are recognizing that negative feelings that make us uncomfortable or unhappy may sometimes be good for us. If we pay attention to them, they can help us identify what is wrong in our life and motivate us to seek change. Research even shows that people who have negative thoughts along with positive ones are healthier.

Adopting an entrepreneurial mindset, as the name implies, resides in the head, not the soul. Many times, though, the heart and the soul can determine, rightly or wrongly, technology adoption.

Anger is not the only one of the seven deadly sins that motivate entrepreneurs. There is more than enough greed and envy.

There’s nothing wrong with being angry about how things are and wanting to change them. In fact, recent research indicates that anger can be constructive in business and negotiations.For the most part, that is the history of the world. But, the key to building something new is more about using the right tool than being a carpenter who uses a hammer for every job. Doing something that you love can have many sources.

and Co-edotor of Digital Health Entrepreneurship

 

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Where are the Sick Care Leaderpreneurs?

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Leadership is in crisis and the command and control model is bankrupt. In healthcare, we will need a cadre of physicians to lead us to the promised land. However, doctors don’t seem interested and are pre-occupied mostly with keeping their heads above water or putting them in the sand.

Physician executives are not necessarily physician entrepreneurs.

Knowledge technicians are different from managers who are different from leaders who are different from entrepreneurs.

Coping, let alone thriving , in this turbulent sick care environment will require an attitude change. Consider:

1. Doctors need to evolve from technicians to managers to leaders to entrepreneurs to leaderpreneurs to thrive. Some call it practicing at the top of your license. In addition, filling the C-suite with more physician managers just makes it harder to innovate and adds further clutter to the organization.

2. Millenials have no interest in leading.

3. The large majority of “leaders” are managers with no leadership skills and are examples of the Peter Principle. At best, most are managing process, safety and quality improvement, not significant and meaningful sick care innovation.

4. Leadership is about communicating vision, direction and inspiration. It is not managing. Entrepreneurship is the pursuit of opportunity with uncontrolled resources with the goal of creating user defined value through the deployment of innovation. Innovation has both a qualitative and quantitative component and is measured by user defined multiples of both.

5. Most leaders fail because they have poor communications skills. They have poor communication skills because they don’t know how to listen, engage and motivate followers.

6. Listening fails for many reasons, not the least of which is not ignoring your internal conversation and changing the lenses through which you see and hear people.

7. Who is “the leader” is not something determined by the org chart. Get rid of it and take advantage of the leadership potential of those without the titles on their office door. Navy Seals do. Israeli army officers do. You can too and it won’t be nearly as dangerous but it usually involves having as much courage.

8. Require every manager to go to leadership boot camp before they can assume any leadership position. Assign them a mentor and get them coaching.

9. Value is the coin of the realm. Leaderpreneurs have to evolve and adopt an entrepreneurial mindset. In the new world of robotic infested work, everyone has to be an entrepreneur or run the risk of losing their jobs. Just ask Watson.

10. Hire, develop, promote and reward for innovation.

Leaderpreneurship development isn’t creating leaderpreneurs whether it be those who deliver are or those who manage and lead it.

Leadership development expert, Alan Patterson, describes the four stages of leadership at it applies to technical experts like physicians:

Stage 1: Expertise derived from technical competence

Stage 2: Credibility derived from people skills

Stage 3: Execution, alignment and engagement, derived from teaching, coaching and inspiring other people , focusing on the now

Stage 4: A strategic mindset focusing on the next (making existing products and services better) and the new (making existing products and services obsolete)

One key difference between management and leadership is that the former is about you and the latter is about coaching and teaching the people you lead.

Here are 10 principles of strategic leadership:

Leadership styles depend on the situation. Here are the six leadership styles Daniel Goleman uncovered among the managers he studied, as well as a brief analysis of the effects of each style on the corporate climate:

The pacesetting leader expects and models excellence and self-direction. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Do as I do, now.” The pacesetting style works best when the team is already motivated and skilled, and the leader needs quick results. Used extensively, however, this style can overwhelm team members and squelch innovation.

  1. The authoritative leader mobilizes the team toward a common vision and focuses on end goals, leaving the means up to each individual. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Come with me.” The authoritative style works best when the team needs a new vision because circumstances have changed, or when explicit guidance is not required. Authoritative leaders inspire an entrepreneurial spirit and vibrant enthusiasm for the mission. It is not the best fit when the leader is working with a team of experts who know more than him or her.
  2. The affiliative leader works to create emotional bonds that bring a feeling of bonding and belonging to the organization. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “People come first.” The affiliative style works best in times of stress, when teammates need to heal from a trauma, or when the team needs to rebuild trust. This style should not be used exclusively, because a sole reliance on praise and nurturing can foster mediocre performance and a lack of direction.
  3. The coaching leader develops people for the future. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Try this.” The coaching style works best when the leader wants to help teammates build lasting personal strengths that make them more successful overall. It is least effective when teammates are defiant and unwilling to change or learn, or if the leader lacks proficiency.

The coercive leader demands immediate compliance. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Do what I tell you.” The coercive style is most effective in times of crisis, such as in a company turnaround or a takeover attempt, or during an actual emergency like a tornado or a fire. This style can also help control a problem teammate when everything else has failed. However, it should be avoided in almost every other case because it can alienate people and stifle flexibility and inventiveness.

The democratic leader builds consensus through participation. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “What do you think?” The democratic style is most effective when the leader needs the team to buy into or have ownership of a decision, plan, or goal, or if he or she is uncertain and needs fresh ideas from qualified teammates. It is not the best choice in an emergency situation, when time is of the essence for another reason or when teammates are not informed enough to offer sufficient guidance to the leader.

Here is another way to slice the pie.

There is a growing acceptance of the practice of formally developing physician leaders to help navigate the increasingly turbulent health care landscape. Research points to the important role that clinical leadershipcan play in improving the performance of health care organizations. Growth in compensation for physician executives, particularly those with postgraduate management degrees, signals higher demand and appreciation of their value.

While satisfaction scores might be high, unfortunately, only about 10% of leadership development programs are successful. They fail for 3 basic reasons:

“The first is a gap in motivations. Organizations invest in executive development for their own long-term good, but individuals participate in order to enhance their skills and advance their careers, and they don’t necessarily remain with the employers who’ve paid for their training. The second is the gap between the skills that executive development programs build and those that firms require—particularly the interpersonal skills essential to thriving in today’s flat, networked, increasingly collaborative organizations. Traditional providers bring deep expertise in teaching cognitive skills and measuring their development, but they are far less experienced in teaching people how to communicate and work with one another effectively. The third reason is the skills transfer gap. Simply put, few executives seem to take what they learn in the classroom and apply it to their jobs—and the farther removed the locus of learning is from the locus of application, the larger this gap becomes. To develop essential leadership and managerial talent, organizations must bridge these three gaps.”

Politicians,whether in your company or in the upcoming elections, promise change. Leaders make it happen. They lead innovators, they don’t manage innovation. There just seems to be fewer and fewer of them wearing white coats and physician leadership and MBA programs are not working.

 

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Why are patients terrible consumers of sickcare services?

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Patients are terrible consumers of sick care services. Most attribute it to the lack of price and quality of care transparency and the incentives to make rational purchases. However, as behavioral economists have learned, consumers are not rational but, instead, are driven by strong psychological and emotional factors that explains patterns of consumption. What’s more, understanding personal spending v spending on the common good gets even more complicated and difficult to understand.

What’s more, a recent study shows that between 60 and 80 percent of patients aren’t forthcoming or even lie to their physicians. Consequently, they might be contributing to an incorrect diagnosis or treatment recommendations.

Some would argue that as value becomes more transparent to patient customers, we won’t need all the brokers, middlemen and intermediaries to do it for them. However, don’t be so optimistic. The trend is to make the cost of sick care services more transparent. Publicizing hospital prices didn’t help in New Hampshire.

Here are some basics of behavioral economics that might help frame the conversation:

1. Frames of reference matters a lot

2. Each person’s spending depends in part on what others spend

3. The costs of failure to keep pace with community spending norms go well beyond mere hurt feelings

4. Positional concerns spawn wasteful spending, even when everyone is well informed and rational

5. Private wasteful spending exceeds public wasteful spending

6. Life is graded on a curve

7. There is no Moore’s Law in sickcare

8. Cognitive ease and cognitive strain determines decision outcomes

9. People would rather do things the easy way instead of the hard way

10. Success in life depends on exercising delayed gratification. Most patients and doctors eat the one marshmellow instead of putting it off so they can get two later.

11. Like everyone else, patients buy emotionally and justify rationally

12. Patients are interested in paying less for more, regardless of the price.

Another consideration is that value factors differ from patient to patient. Some want convenience, others want “the best” and still others will take “good enough” as long as they don’t have to pay out of pocket for services.

We also need to rethink the IoT and “smart” environments.

Depending on informed, rational patients to bend the cost curve will fail without understanding the other, more subtle motivations that drive consumers. We all consume emotionally and justify rationally.

 and the Life Science Innovation Roadmap

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

How to Staff Your Startup Team

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

Every entrepreneur who has succeeded or failed (is there a difference?) has advice about how to get the right people on the bus. What questions should you ask at the interview? What character traits should you seek and how do you do that? How much is science and how much is just going with your gut and whether you click?

What Google found was that interview scores had no correlation with performance, of those who got hired.

Likewise, advisors or potential employees want to find the right fit as well. The rules are somewhat different when it comes to the board of directors, the management team, employees, consultants and advisors.

Maybe flipping a coin or a job lottery would save a bunch of time and money and get the same results.

I’ve been on both sides of the table so allow me share my two cents on how to staff your startup:

1. Hope for the best and expect to fire fast. Give yourself lots of wiggle room.

2. Don’t hire hood ornaments (doctors with fancy credentials that you parade on your website and pitch deck) unless you simply need one for credibility and really don’t expect them to do much more.

3. Clarify expectations, timelines and benchmarks

4. Rent advisors, don’t buy them

5. Barter, don’t rent, if possible

6. Expect most people to put a hand up, not show up

7. Define your next critical success factor (like raising 2M dollars in seed money) and find people who can help get it done. Once it’s done, stop and empty the bus, and reload. For example, suppose your company has achievements to date that include FDA 510(k) submission, provisional and non-provisional patent filing (there is no such thing as a non-provisional patent granted by the USPTO), and patent attorney freedom-to-operate letter (here’s what that is). You have raised $200,000 from angel investors and are currently raising $1.5M in the current seed round with a valuation of $10M. Who do you want to help, how and how much will you compensate them and for how long?

8. Don’t give away the store early in the game. If you are successful, you’ll have to give it away to get the money anyway so keep your powder dry

9. Hire people who are card carrying members of the Get Shit Done Club  

10. Evolve as fast as you can from a knowledge technician to manager, to leader, to entrepreneur to leaderpreneur i.e. work on the company, not in it.

11. Be careful about hiring interns since there are practical and labor law issues that can make your life more complicated than it already is or is going to be. Internships are supposed to be about helping the intern. You want people who primary purpose is to help your company as much and as soon as possible

12. Don’t overhire for quality or quantity. Do you really need to hire that expensive CFO when what you really need is someone to keep the books and do payroll at this stage of the game? What about business development, sales and marketing?

13. Figure out whether you are hiring someone, or joining someone, to help with strategy or tactics. At the beginning, it is usually a cacophany of both. As the company validates its model, though, there is the risk of the distraction of traction. For a surgical benefits management company, for example, you need to focus and define your SCOPE.

14. The single most important question you can ask yourself is, “Do I like and trust these people?” The second is, “Can I deliver what they want, or am I just doing this to stroke my ego and make some bucks?”

15. If you had one more day to live, would you spend it in a co-working space wearing a hoodie? How about training and hiring felons?

16. Promote intergenerational collaboration

17. Don’t hire doctors to sell your products. They don’t know how to do it.

18. Here’s some advice on who should be on your board

Here are some tips on hiring sales people and avoiding the mistakes.

This on-demand talent model, dubbed SPEED by the author (Success, Plan, Execute, Evaluate, Decide), is good for the company, and good for all specialized, dedicated, and high performing people in the workforce today. Your company gets the flexibility to adapt quickly to the needs of a rapidly changing marketplace, and workers get to broaden their experience in the work they love.

One empirical analysis shows that companies that are equipped with both business and technical skills are disproportionately more likely to introduce new-to-the market innovations than firms that have only one of these skills. However, not all firms that are equipped with both types of skills are able to profit from them. Firms profit disproportionately from a mix of business and technical skills when the founder has technical knowledge and employs additional business experts. By contrast, we find no evidence of complimentary either when business and technical skills are balanced within a founding team, or when a founder with business skills hires employees with technical skills.

Entrepreneurial startup success is about entrepreneurial startup TEAMwork i.e.finding the people:

  1. Who have Talent
  2. Who can Execute
  3. Who can Articulate a vision, mission, values and strategy
  4. Who know how to raise, manage, protect and make large sums of Money

That means you will have to find people who play some skill positions like problem seeker, problem solver, money finder, score keeper, product developer, business builder, dot connector, risk manager and story teller.

The startup lineup should also have people in it with these skills and abilities.

How do you compensate these people without breaking the startup bank? Here are some ideas.

Hiring the right people makes the difference between fun and misery. Plan to make lots of mistakes and fire fast. Pivoting often means taking casualties.

 

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

How to close the doctor-patient digital divide

GUEST POST from Arlen Meyers

When it comes to eCare, patients are way ahead of their doctors.  During the summer of 2015 Neilsen surveyed 5014 patients and 626 physicians. Among the specific results found are that while 36% of patients would like 24/7 access to telephone advice, only 14% currently have it. Text reminders for appointments are desirable for 28% of the surveyed patients but only 9% can get reminders sent to their phones. Only 11% are able to ask questions online of their health care providers but 30% would like that ability. The numbers are higher for physician access to Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) themselves from the patients’ perspective: 61% say their doctors are able to access EMRs and 77% think doctors should have that capability. In surveying physicians, Neilsen found in general that doctors are very low users themselves of telemedicine and more than half don’t think it’s important or even good for their patients and they don’t recommend it often.

Since then, things haven’t changed much to close the doctor-patient digital divide.

Whether an individual physician is in a practice that uses telemedicine depends greatly on if that physician is a radiologist or a gastroenterologist. Specialty also significantly affects whether a physician uses telemedicine to interact with patients or with peers and which telemedicine modality is used.

That was a finding of a benchmark study by AMA researchers who looked at who is using telemedicine, how they are using it and what obstacles remain to its implementation.

A little more than 15 percent of physicians worked in a practice that uses telemedicine to interact with patients, while 11.2 percent worked in practices that use telemedicine to interact with other health care professionals, according to the study published in Health Affairs.

The doctor-patient adoption gap is but one of many. Here are 10 reasons why your doctor won’t text you.

Treatment for the problem, like most prescriptions, will vary from patient to patient, but there are some treatment guidelines

1. Focus on making digital health a subsegmented academic domain

2. Mandate digital health education in medical school and residency

3. Craft a specific value proposition for the scientists, engineers, lawyers, businesspeople, and health professionals

4. Create better networks and better products that have proven clinical efficacy that results in improved workflow that saves time, not wastes it.

5. Create better knowledge exchange programs

6. Offer better experiential learning opportunties

7. Focus on creating user defined value, not investor defined companies

8. Prototype and simulate to verify and validate

9. Expand bioentrepreneurship education and training programs.

10. Reward faculty digital health innovation scholarship

Most importantly, doctors don’t practice eCare mostly because they don’t have to. For them to practice eCare using state of the art digital health technologies, it needs to rise to the standard of care and doctors need to be held accountable for deviating from the standard. For that to happen, we need compelling value propositions that address a specific patient need, champions to innovate, teams to move it forward and organizations to align strategies, goals and incentives. Most of that will depend on changing the rules to catalyze ecosystems.

Doctors will use digital health technologies when it has been demonstrated to add value, improve workflow, generate revenue, reduce liability and allow them to spend more face time with patients. They are looking for a whole product solution, not stand alone add ons that are not integrated into the electronic medical record.

Doctors are not resisting eCare because they are lazy Luddites, uninformed or unwilling to help patients using state of the art medical and information technologies. They simply are not convinced that they should be part of the standard medical armamentarium, any more so than the latest robot or laser that is new and shiny. There is still a lot of irrational exuberance around digital health and docs don’t want to buy into the hype. Entrepreneurs need to check some boxes too.

While we are taking steps to introduce new digital health technologies, it takes years for medical standards to evolve and adopted and eCare will be no different. Don’t rush it. It took almost 50 years for doctors to use stethoscopes after they were invented. It might not take that long to kill it.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.