Author Archives: Julie Anixter

About Julie Anixter

Julie Anixter is an innovation and design strategist with decades of experience helping organizations navigate change. She is co-founder of New Scenario and an Operating Partner at Orchid Black, and previously served as Executive Director of AIGA. A frequent writer and speaker, she has collaborated with leaders including Tom Peters and Seth Godin.

Weekend Mashup 9-18-11

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

Confidence is a mystical thing.”  I don’t know who said it but I know that I heard it on NPR as I headed out to work Friday and listened to their report on consumer confidence and the market.  It struck me as not just true, but a place — geographically, economically and emotionally speaking — that innovators can, and must, make their mark.  Is innovation the antidote or at least the point-counterpoint to depression?  I think  yes.  This week’s mashup shows how some companies and countries are facing hard situations with novel and or counterintuitive approaches:

The good, the bad, and the ugly of demand creationTarget’s event-sale of Missoni over delivered on buzz and undelivered on supply, generating ill will that even some junior analyst might have modeled and predicted, right?  Clearly after decades of making whimsical zig zag outlier fashion – Missoni is missing an opportunity to go mass.

Labor won’t like it! But what might our economy learn from  German’s “mini jobs” and the counterintuitive work of allowing workers and employers to “date” (and think of all the first dates you went on that made you say no to a second!) that Germany’s Hartz Commission for Modernizing the Labor Market gave to Germany and lowered unemployment through the reforms that flipped the German employment model on its head.  Thanks Planet Money.

Whither P&G? Many of us in the innovation community have worked with them and watch them.   A Wall Street Journal story this week captured the company’s pessimism about the middle class and move towards readjusting its portfolio strategy to the top and bottom strata.  Why don’t the big “I” innovators like P&G, IBM, Apple, and Google just admit that they could shape shift and put University of Phoenix and give every executive education program a real challenge if they ever got into the business of selling capability building.  Because they could.

Don’t go too low…because you can look forward to our exclusive interview with Tom Peters tomorrow on Excellence NOW, also the name of his new book…just in time to back into the work week with a head of steam and the ranting energy of  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

One Man's View – The 9-11 Neighborhood

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

Editors Note:  It seemed fitting to us to begin this day with an example of post 9-11 innovation that is about us responding to and taking care of each other.

Fellow Meetuppers,

I don’t write to our whole community often, but this week is special because it’s the 10th anniversary of 9/11 and many people don’t know that Meetup is a 9/11 baby.

Let me tell you the Meetup story. I was living a couple miles from the Twin Towers, and I was the kind of person who thought local community doesn’t matter much if we’ve got the internet and tv. The only time I thought about my neighbors was when I hoped they wouldn’t bother me.

When the towers fell, I found myself talking to more neighbors in the days after 9/11 than ever before. People said hello to neighbors (next-door and across the city) who they’d normally ignore. People were looking after each other, helping each other, and meeting up with each other. You know, being
neighborly.

A lot of people were thinking that maybe 9/11 could bring people together in a lasting way. So the idea for Meetup was born: Could we use the internet to get off the internet — and grow local communities?

We didn’t know if it would work. Most people thought it was a crazy idea — especially because terrorism is designed to make people distrust one another.

A small team came together, and we launched Meetup 9 months after 9/11.

Today, almost 10 years and 10 million Meetuppers later, it’s working. Every day, thousands of Meetups happen. Moms Meetups, Small Business Meetups, Fitness Meetups… a wild variety of 100,000 Meetup Groups with not much in common — except one thing.

Every Meetup starts with people simply saying hello to neighbors. And what often happens next is still amazing to me.

They grow businesses and bands together, they teach and motivate each other, they babysit each other’s kids and find other ways to work together. They have fun and find solace together. They make friends and form powerful community. It’s powerful stuff.

It’s a wonderful revolution in local community, and it’s thanks to everyone who shows up.

Meetups aren’t about 9/11, but they may not be happening if it weren’t for 9/11.

9/11 didn’t make us too scared to go outside or talk to strangers. 9/11 didn’t rip us apart. No, we’re building new community together.

The towers fell, but we rise up. And we’re just getting started with these Meetups.

Scott Heiferman (on behalf of 80 people at Meetup HQ)
Co-Founder & CEO, Meetup
New York City
September 2011


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Weekend Mashup 9-10-11

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

As this week wraps up on the tenth anniversary of 9-11 we are deluged and provoked by reflection and remembrance — especially here in New York and D.C.   To quote Kurt Anderson quoting Freud — there are three ways to deal with loss: inebriating substances, satisfying activities, and deflection. This week’s mashup includes some of all of the above:

  1. Ben Bernanke, Fed Chief, in Friday’s New York Times said that U.S. consumers are “depressed beyond reason or expectation.” An innovation opportunity if there ever was one, though an Irish tourist told me in D.C. this week that “you just aren’t used to bad economies, like the rest of the world.”
  2. Reason not to be depressed: Innovation Excellence blogger discovery of the week: Venessa Miemis’s Emergent by Design where she welcomes “fellow travelers, visionaries, and agents of change” examining our global society in transition. Miemis has a poignant and fresh take:  “Many of our traditional institutions are failing or just broken. The narrative is broken. The idea of ‘us verse them’ doesn’t work when the realization is made that we are all co-existing in an interdependent set of systems. We are now in the process of telling a new story about how civilization can function in a way that incorporates sustainable practices and leads to resilient and thrivable societies.” Like I said.  Not depressing.
  3. From The Department of  Narrative NPR Three Minute Fiction Competition judge Danielle Evans, author of Before You Suffocate Your Own Fool Self, says there are only two:  “Guy rides into town.  Guy leaves town.” And those are the topics of the competition.  Listen to more here.
  4. Alec Baldwin, drunk apparently on love, declares he’d rather travel the world with new girlfriend than be “hand-cuffed to the emergency command center in Maspeth during a hurricane.”  A defacto ‘I am not running for mayor’ moment. Too bad — his ability to do the narrative would have been wonderful to watch.
  5. Opening tonight at the San Francisco Opera,  The Heart of a Solider. A tribute and rite of passage for one of the many who died on 9-11, Rick Rescorla, (seen in the photo above) was a British-born adventurer who fought in Vietnam before becoming head of security for a brokerage firm at the World Trade Center.  “On September 11, 2001, his extraordinary courage and calmness in a crisis paid off: Rescorla led all of the 2,700 people under his care to safety—literally singing them down the stairs—before heading back into the burning building for one last check.”  He, like so many that are being remembered this weekend, never emerged.  Listen here.

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Haque's "Lessons of Jobs" Stirs Debate on HBR

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

The outpouring of commentary post-Jobs’ resignation has been daunting.  You could feel the business world shudder, pause and reflect.  Like a shot going off in an echo-chamber.  One of the best of the best pieces to my taste is Umair Haque’s last HBR post   “Steve’s Seven Insights for 21st Century Capitalists” because, well, he not only crisply summarizes Jobs’ impact like so many choice morsels, through his own words, but he inspired one interesting debate — 33 comments worth reading — that gets at the paradox that is Jobs’ leadership.

Steve took on the challenge of proving that the art of enterprise didn’t have to culminate in a stagnant pond of unenlightenment — and won.   In doing so, he might just have built something approximating the modern world’s most dangerously enlightened company.”  vs.  (one of the commenter’s — who worked for Apple! — responses:)

I think we make a mistake by extrapolating from Steve’s genius to draw general conclusions about how to conduct business. A genius like Steve Jobs is exceedingly rare and may come along only once in a generation. At the same time, most company cultures are incapable of (and are in fact systematically opposed to) supporting exceptionalism.”

We all find voices that we resonate with…that stimulate us…that we turn to when we want to think a bit harder.  I tend towards irreverent lightning rods like Haque, who is the Director of the Havas Media Lab and author of The New Capitalist Manifesto: Building a Disruptively Better Business.   Read the whole piece, and add your comments should you be provoked,  here.


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Weekend Mashup 9-4-11!

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

Here’s a new feature — a quirky list of news from around the blogosphere that entertained, inspired, and provoked us:

1.  Seth Godin’s precise observational generosity: particularly his sharing of “a fascinating, generous and over-the-top-in-a-good-way article on infographics by Ed Fry.” We’d loved it too! Worth bookmarking!

2. Karl Rove’s OpEd piece in the Wall Street Journal In the US we love it when Republicans and Democrats agree! So Rare! So Important! Especially on a non-partisan topic like Veterans’ Transition. Veterans from all militaries are an untapped source of innovation, and the American Corporate Partners are taking a great step to help connect them to companies.

3. Fast Company’s reporting on an “Ebay for Science” On second thought, why can’t research be bought by the drink? Another shout out for aggregating global talent. Calling all unemployed scientists! Researchers! Science Fair leaders!

4. And, from the “what’s so funny bout peace love and understanding corner” we cannot end the week without noting that President Obama will go live Thursday in a prime-time address before Congress and the US public to outline a new round of “urgent” economic stimulus measures. With this week’s US jobs report (stalled at zero growth) we’re all ears!

5. Finally, in next week’s feature, Global Innovator and author Donna Sturgess (GSK, Buyology) will weigh in on the role of Anticipatory Thinking. Knowing Donna, we’re anticipating that!


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

DIY Manufacturing – Run Your Own Factory at Home

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

WIRED editor-in-chief Chris Anderson and Autodesk CEO Carl Bass discuss the future of 3D printing, and how amateur designers may soon be able to build resource-intensive products like furniture using remote but cost-effective tools.

The New Industrial Revolution: How Web Innovation Models Are Transforming Manufacturing. Featuring Carl Bass, President & CEO, Autodesk, in conversation with Chris Anderson.

Carl Bass is president and chief executive officer of Autodesk, the world’s leading maker of design software for the architecture, engineering, and entertainment industries. The company’s products range from its flagship AutoCAD program to digital modeling and prototyping tools for industry. Autodesk’s CG apps have been used on every movie that’s won the Academy Award for Visual Effects in the past 15 years, from Titanic to Avatar. Under Bass’ leadership the California-based firm has been repeatedly honored by Fast Company as one of the world’s most innovative companies.

Chris Anderson is editor in chief of WIRED magazine, a position he’s held since 2001. During his tenure, the magazine has received eight National Magazine Awards and seven additional nominations. It won the prestigious top prize for general excellence in 2005, 2007, and 2009. In 2009, Adweek honored WIRED as its Magazine of the Decade.


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

McQueen at the Met – A Lesson in Demand Creation

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

When the Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty exhibit closed on August 7 at New York City’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, it left a swath of unmet needs, unfulfilled consumer demand, and a transformation of the designer’s personal and corporate brand.  The late McQueen was elevated from fashion rebel/outsider to Artist/household name in the exhibit’s wake, but for thousands of New Yorkers – it was only hearsay because they could not get in.   The show opened with 5,100 visitors on its first day, more than popular shows like the Jacqueline Kennedy and Chanel exhibitions.  When it closed, the final attendance count had reached 661,509 visitors, making it the eighth biggest show on record in the history of Metropolitan Museum of Art. Not bad for the son of Cockney cab driver, and the one of the six children that was always a “misfit.” Today, as the summer of our US debt ceiling debate wanes, and economic doldrums continue around the world, Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty left behind some very compelling lessons about innovation economics and the pursuit of passion.

Lesson #1:  True innovation creates demand.

According to the New York Times:

“The exhibition also broke the attendance record for the Met’s Costume Institute, surpassing the 2008 show “Superheroes: Fashion and Fantasy,” which had 576,000 visitors. Nearly 80,000 people saw the McQueen show during its final week, as the museum stayed open until midnight for its final two nights.”

This is an example of consumers delighting in something they didn’t know was missing.  This is a clear cut case of a phenom.   McQueen’s work, and the Met’s packaging of it passed the law of demand test, which Melvin and Boye define as “the quantity of a well-defined good or service that people are willing and able to buy, during a particular period of time, that decreases/increases as the price of that good or service rises/falls.”

People were willing to buy Savage Beauty.  More than 23,000 people purchased membership to the museum during the exhibition, allowing them to skip the line, and 17,000 people bought $50 tickets to see it over the last eight Mondays, when the museum is normally closed.  The museum also sold more than 100,000 copies of the related catalog.  People just couldn’t get enough.  They were willing to stand in lines for up to four hours during one of the hottest summers in Manhattan history.   The show was so popular that both trustee and uber-Vogue Anna Wintour and the museum were “startled.”  To keep up with demand, the museum  extended the exhibit by a week and extra morning and night-time hours were added as well as the special Monday openings – “Mondays with McQueen” – when the rest of the museum was shut.

We knew [the Met exhibition] would do well, but we didn’t know how well,” said Wintour.  “One of the mailroom guys told me yesterday how much he enjoyed the show.  It just shows you how fashion now reaches so many different people.” We think what reached people went beyond even fashion.  What reached in and grabbed people by the throat was the intensity of his passion, manifested in an amazingly beautiful lifetime body of work.

Lesson #2:  Demand is fueled by scarcity.

There is no one quite like McQueen. He was a constructor and a de-constructor simultaneously, a Saville Row trained tailor and a crafts movement devotee.  Just as Frank Gehry’s buildings have messed with our concept of what a building is – McQueen’s designs – particularly as they were shown in the romantic hero cave design of the Met galleries, challenge our idea of what fashion is, or can be.  McQueen had the courage to do things that no one else would do…“a blouse threaded with worms, a coat sprouting horns, shoes that devour feet.  A pert little jacket is printed with a crucifixion scene; the hair on a full-length hair shirt is carefully waved and combed; a corset has a cast-metal animal spine curling out from behind.” (New York Times, May 4, 2011)

No wonder such a broad cross-cutting demographic turned up.  In every place we work in, we meet people who would move closer on the scales towards McQueen level inquiry, if they could give their imagination voice.  McQueen set a gold standard for giving oneself permission to create.

Lesson #3  Demand Relies on Imagination and Knowledge Equally for Power.

Obviously, if you look at this work, you can tell that McQueen advocated free thought and free speech and championed “the authority of the imagination.”  In so doing, he exemplified the Romantic, the hero-artist who staunchly follows the dictates of his inspiration.”

At the same time, he respected and bent tradition.  According to the Metropolitan Museum’s curators “integral to the McQueen culture is the juxtaposition between contrasting elements: fragility and strength, tradition and modernity,  fluidity and severity.  An openly emotional and even passionate viewpoint is realized with a profound respect and influence for the arts and crafts tradition. Alexander’s collections combine an in-depth working knowledge of bespoke British tailoring, the finest skill of the French Haute Couture atelier and the impeccable finish of Italian manufacturing.”

What are fashion houses and museums if not hothouse climates for entrepreneurship and innovation (with their emphasis on R&D, design, partnerships and licenses) – both are businesses in the business of cyclical creativity.   That McQueen took his creativity to the edge  (“ethereal and gross, graceful and utterly manipulative, and poised on a line where fashion turns into something else.” – New York Times) was in part a tribute to the powerfully creative atmospheres of the ateliers, the collaborative spaces, he insisted on working within.  In addition to knowledge and inspiration, every innovator needs a really good lab.

Lesson #4  Creating Demand often Requires Clearing the Decks.

The economist Joseph Schumpeter argued that creative destruction (a term he popularized) is crucial to capitalism.  McQueen was the ultimate destroyer.  “What I am trying to bring to fashion is a sort of originality,” he said. For Schumpeter, innovation economies were based on evolving institutions, entrepreneurs, and technological change that are at the heart of economic growth.

At 16 McQueen landed an apprenticeship with a Savile Row tailoring firm that catered to the British royal family, and became a serious pupil.  Like Picasso’s early study of classical painting, McQueen received a virtuoso’s grasp of the mechanics of clothes making — cutting, sewing, constructing — and those became the cliffs from which he leapt.

Lesson #5 Demand Doubles Down.

Demand is generative.  The Met Show has not been the only McQueen moment this summer.  Kate Middleton’s wedding dress was designed by Sarah Burton – “McQueen’s right-hand woman in life, and the head designer of the McQueen label in death,”  and instantly became the main attraction – this time at Buckingham Palace –  since opening last month.   When the demand curves of all consumers are added up, the result is the market demand curve for that product.  Hence the lines that snaked around blocks in New York and London.

Innovation economics reformulate conventional economics theory so that knowledge, technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation are positioned at the center of the model rather than seen as independent forces that are largely unaffected by policy.   Alexander McQueen, in his short but intensely self-actualized creative life, embodied these qualities, and infused them into everything he did.

In the end, why did so many people line up?  Was it about Fashion?  I think it went deeper. His work spoke to people.  It highlights the huge, wealth creating opportunities that are possible when you have the courage to create something different and new, something important enough to spark the public’s imagination.  When that happens, traffic and word of mouth increase, the buzz begins, lines form and in all kinds of ways, cash flows to the sublime.

Special Bonus:

Check out this video interview with Andrew Bolton about Alexander McQueen and the collection:


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Tom Peters, Arie De Geus, and Roses

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

Sometimes life is like StumpleUpon. I was talking to Rowan Gibson today about Royal Dutch Shell and the work of Arie De Geus, memorialized in his book The Living Company and it turned out it had been important to both of us. Hearing Arie De Geus speak at a Senge Systems Thinking conference in Boston 20 years ago changed the way I viewed organizations. De Geus has had that effect on many people around the world. Including it seems, on Tom Peters. I clicked on Tom’s blog just now and found this:



Gospel!

I have about 3K slides in my “Master Presentation.” These are either “the most important,” or, surely, in the Top 1%:


Arie De Geus, The Living Company (father of “scenario planning” at Royal Dutch Shell): “Rose gardeners face a choice every spring. The long-term fate of a rose garden depends on this decision. If you want to have the largest and most glorious roses of the neighborhood, you will prune hard.

This represents a policy of low tolerance and tight control. You force the plant to make the maximum use of its available resources, by putting them into the rose’s ‘core business.’ Pruning hard is a dangerous policy in an unpredictable environment. Thus, if you are in a spot where you know nature may play tricks on you, you may opt for a policy of high tolerance. You will never have the biggest roses, but you have a much-enhanced chance of having roses every year. You will achieve a gradual renewal of the plant.

In short, tolerant pruning achieves two ends: (1) It makes it easier to cope with unexpected environmental changes. (2) It leads to a continuous restructuring of the plant. The policy of tolerance admittedly wastes resources—the extra buds drain away nutrients from the main stem. But in an unpredictable environment, this policy of tolerance makes the rose healthier in the long run.”


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

"Tanks Alot" and Other Words of Wisdom on the Situation

GUEST POST from Julie Anixter

Adults, Would-Be Adults and Kids Weigh In…

First, my favorite pot shot from the non-adult, the most adolescent of journalistic voices, The New York Post…

“Tanks Alot” with a picture of our president. Blaming someone else, in this case BAM as they punk-call him, versus being accountable. The very definition of non-adulthood.

People are going to feel less rich and that will make them hold back on spending, which will be a further blow to the economy.” Beth Ann Bovino, Senior U.S. Economist, Standard & Poors, Wall Street Journal, 8-9-11

I keep waiting for one wealthy, well-known figure to stand up and publicly say that he or she is willing to pay more in taxes as part of the shared sacrafice necessary to gain control of the country’s deficit. I know there are wealthy people who’ve had that thought — not just liberals like Warren Buffett, but old-fashioned, rocked-ribb Republicans who are worried aboutthe country’s debt problems. I even have a pretty good idea who some of them are. Come on folks. Your country needs to hear from you. ” Joe Nocera, New York Times, 8-9-2011

Wake up. We gotta suck it up. Pay this bill. And have a loooooong talk about how we never get here again, while still maintaining our identity as a great country made up of great, caring people.” Alec Baldwin, Huffington Post,
7-29-2011

The Treasury can cry foul all it wants, but the decision by Standard & Poors to downgrade America’s credit rating by one notch last Friday, and the subsequent plunge in the market, are serious symptoms of a loss of confidence that is fundamentally political, not economic.” — Menzie D. Chinn and Jeffry A. Frieden, New York Times, 8-9-11

My friends all generally share the same option that old-style companies – company town type companies – are completely a thing of the past in the Western World. I have a good friend who works at a start-up called ChartBeat. He associates with “Silicon Alley” types and frequently discusses how, despite the long hours and stressful circumstances, he loves it because he is building something. While he is prone to hyperbole, he has said that he (and most around him) believe that internet/high-tech related companies are the only companies creating jobs in the US. I think this is somewhat true, and in the spirt of your website I think you could easily substitute innovative for internet/high-tech. I think there is a general sense in my generation that, for the vast majority, it is no longer enough to simply get a job and “climb the ladder”; you have to create your own ladder. Even my friends in finance, which is traditionally a climb the ladder old-boys-club type industry in my view, have chosen a more entreprenual route by working for start-up funds rather than large established institutions.

It is my opinion that the world has changed in a fundamental way. Look at a company like Tata Steel. These days, such old school industrial institutions are only sustainable in countries with generally low costs and low quality of life. The United States need to look to more innovative and agile business models as a means of creating wealth and doing business in general.” – My 20-something nephew, who works for an internet company.

OK. It may BE a depressing economic moment. But it’s our moment. Reading, writing, posting the words of this community is reaffirming and humbling. We practice and believe in innovation as a discipline that unleashes possibility. We have a great opportunity to lead ourselves out of the collective global economic morass. Here’s hoping we have the guts.


Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.