Unlearning to Learn
GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia
In a world characterized by exponential change — where AI capabilities evolve every quarter and market demands shift before the quarterly report is filed — learning is often cited as the key to survival. Yet, leaders consistently overlook the prerequisite for true innovative learning: Unlearning. As a human-centered change and innovation thought leader, I contend that the greatest obstacle to embracing new possibilities isn’t a lack of knowledge or resources; it’s the weight of what we already know. Our past successes, entrenched processes, and deeply held technical expertise act as cognitive anchors, preventing us from navigating uncharted waters.
Unlearning is the deliberate process of discarding obsolete information, mindsets, and behavioral routines that are no longer relevant to the current reality. It is not forgetting, but rather making room for new knowledge by consciously retiring outdated, suboptimal habits. This is a profound human and organizational challenge. We are biologically wired to favor efficiency and certainty, meaning our brains prefer to use existing cognitive pathways. For organizations, this manifests as organizational memory bias, where past triumphs dictate future strategy, causing us to learn a new tool but insist on applying it using the old, linear process. The key is shedding the old process.
The Three Strategic Imperatives of Unlearning
For organizations to transform unlearning from an abstract concept into a strategic advantage, they must focus on three core imperatives:
- De-Crystallizing Core Assumptions (The ‘Why’): Challenge the sacred cows—the beliefs about customers, competitors, or processes that have been true for a decade but may be failing now. This includes unlearning technical assumptions, such as the belief that data must remain siloed, which prevents modern AI integration.
- Creating Friction for Automation (The ‘How’): Old habits are dangerous when they become automated and unquestioned. We must introduce controlled friction points—such as mandatory cross-functional rotation or requiring new-hire perspectives in legacy project reviews—to force teams to pause, reflect, and consciously choose a new path over the default path. This is a deliberate intervention against autopilot thinking.
- Decoupling Identity from Expertise (The ‘Who’): The most senior and successful employees often have the most to unlearn, as their identity is intrinsically linked to their obsolete expertise. Leaders must establish psychological safety where unlearning is framed not as an admission of individual failure, but as a continuous commitment to organizational relevance.
“Your past success is your organization’s greatest vulnerability. Don’t let yesterday’s win anchor you to tomorrow’s failure.” — Braden Kelley
Case Study 1: Netflix – Unlearning the Physical Asset Model
The Challenge:
In the early 2000s, Netflix achieved remarkable success by disrupting video rental with a superior mail-order, DVD-based model. Their core organizational competency was logistics — managing physical inventory, shipping, and returns. This success became a massive cognitive anchor when high-speed internet made streaming possible. Their deeply ingrained knowledge of the physical world actively worked against their digital future.
The Unlearning Solution:
Netflix’s leadership, led by Reed Hastings, made a conscious, painful decision to unlearn their core asset. They had to shed the identity of a logistics company and embrace the identity of a technology and content company. This meant separating the DVD business and the streaming business, forcing the streaming unit to build entirely new competencies and metrics focused on digital delivery and latency, rather than physical inventory and postal service efficiency. They had to unlearn the “perfect” physical delivery process.
The Innovation Impact:
This deliberate act of self-disruption and unlearning allowed Netflix to build the foundation for its streaming dominance. By voluntarily creating friction and letting go of the habits that made them successful, they freed capital, talent, and attention to master the new competencies required for the digital era, ultimately redefining an entire industry.
Case Study 2: Haier – Unlearning the Traditional Management Hierarchy
The Challenge:
Haier, a massive Chinese appliance manufacturer, faced the global challenge of becoming truly customer-centric in a bureaucratic, centrally managed corporate structure. Their organizational muscle was built on command-and-control and mass production efficiency—a model that stifled local innovation and responsiveness.
The Unlearning Solution:
Haier’s CEO, Zhang Ruimin, initiated the RenDanHeYi model, a radical exercise in organizational unlearning. They abolished nearly all traditional middle management and restructured the company into thousands of small, autonomous business units called Microenterprises (MEs). These MEs were forced to become self-governing, find their own customers, and manage their own P&L (profit and loss) against the market. They had to unlearn the security and structure of guaranteed corporate security and centralized decision-making.
The Innovation Impact:
This massive organizational unlearning forced responsiveness at the edge. By shedding the old habits of central planning and top-down control, Haier enabled its MEs to rapidly innovate and localize products (e.g., specialized washing machines for specific niche markets). The shift created an internal entrepreneurial ecosystem, proving that organizational structure itself is an outdated habit that must be unlearned to achieve true agility and customer-centricity.
Conclusion: The L&D Imperative and the Courage to Be Obsolete
Unlearning is the highest-leverage activity in a change-driven environment. It requires leaders to demonstrate courage to be obsolete — to admit that the ways that brought them success yesterday will likely be the source of their failure tomorrow.
The L&D function must pivot its focus from teaching new skills to facilitating the shedding of old, limiting beliefs and processes. This is done by actively building the three strategic imperatives—challenging core assumptions, creating friction for automated habits, and decoupling identity from expertise. Stop asking only, “What must we learn next?” and start by asking the harder, more critical question: “What must we willingly let go of first?” Only by creating empty cognitive and structural space can you truly plant the seeds of new, emerging possibilities.
Extra Extra: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.
Image credit: 1 of 950+ FREE quote slides available at http://misterinnovation.com
Sign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.