Tag Archives: challenges

The Biggest Challenge for Innovation is Organizational Inertia

Leave a reply

The Biggest Challenge for Innovation is Organizational Inertia

GUEST POST from Stefan Lindegaard

I often talk about organizational inertia being the biggest obstacle for innovation but if this is true for your organization what should you look out for? Here’s my take.

  1. Aligning with organizational goals and strategy: Innovation teams need to ensure that their ideas and initiatives are aligned with the broader goals and strategy of the organization. This can be challenging if there is a lack of clear communication or alignment between the innovation team and other parts of the organization.
  2. Gaining support and buy-in: Innovation teams often need to gain support and buy-in from others within the organization in order to move forward with their ideas. This can be difficult if there is resistance to change or a lack of understanding of the value of the team’s ideas.
  3. Overcoming cultural barriers and resistance to change: Many organizations have entrenched cultures and practices that can be resistant to change. This can make it difficult for innovation teams to gain support and buy-in for their ideas, and can even lead to resistance or pushback from others within the organization.
  4. Navigating organizational structure and processes: Innovation teams may face challenges related to the structure and processes of their organization, such as bureaucratic red tape or a lack of clear decision-making processes.
  5. Generating new and creative ideas: Innovation teams need to constantly come up with fresh ideas, which can be a challenging and pressure-filled task.
  6. Delivering results quickly: In today’s fast-paced business environment, innovation teams often face pressure to deliver results quickly, which can be difficult if their ideas require a significant amount of time and resources to develop.
  7. Communicating and collaborating effectively: Innovation teams often need to work closely with others, including other teams, departments, and even external partners. This can be challenging if team members have different backgrounds, perspectives, and communication styles.
  8. Operating within constraints: Innovation teams often have to work within the constraints of limited budgets, resources, and other factors, which can make it difficult to pursue new ideas and initiatives.

Overall, these challenges can make it difficult for innovation teams to be effective and successful in driving innovation within their organizations.

How to address this is very much related the specific situation of an organization and in particular the root causes they deal with.

There is, however, no doubt that this has to dealt with from the top down in order to release the full potential of innovation for the organization.

Image Credit: Stefan Lindegaard, Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Top 5 CX Strategies, Objectives, and Challenges

Leave a reply

Top 5 CX Strategies, Objectives, and Challenges

GUEST POST from Shep Hyken

Reuters Events puts on a series of global leadership conferences that focus on key topics & challenges within particular industries, such as pharma, energy, automotive, and more. Their mission is to “offer help in the sectors where it’s needed most, using specialist industry knowledge to promote development.” Their upcoming Conference in San Diego, Customer Service & Experience 2023, caters to service & experience professionals from across industry lines.

I had a chance to interview Josh Wheeler, strategic events director, customer service & experience, to discuss their recent research titled State of Experience and Service Report 2023. In this report are some fascinating findings that we can all learn from. They surveyed 321 global business leaders from various industries. The first big question:

Why should you invest in CX and customer service?

  • 93% of the executives said it’s a key brand differentiator.
  • 86% said it’s the bedrock of profitability.
  • 79% said it’s the foundation of customer loyalty.

More and more, the concept of CX (which includes customer service) is becoming as important – if not more so – as any other important strategic initiative. In a world where most of us have direct competitors who might sell exactly what we sell, the only thing to differentiate us from the competition is the CX we deliver.

With that in mind, here are five of the top objectives, challenges, and strategies from the project’s findings, along with my commentary:

1. The Biggest CX Investment Challenges

You have an idea to improve CX, but you must get buy in from the C-Suite and other stakeholders. It turns out the number one challenge is demonstrating ROI. While we all want happy customers, our leaders are often concerned with the cost to do so. I’ve always preached that CX shouldn’t cost. It should pay. When asking for new technology, more people, training, etc., you must show the return. It must go from a “nice to have” to a “must have” based on the benefits to customers, employees, and the bottom line.

2. The Top Customer-Centric Objectives

The number one objective of the 321 executives surveyed was analyzing and using customer feedback. Often a company will ask for feedback, and they get it. Then what do they do with it? Many times, not enough. Feedback is the best opportunity for improvement. Get it and use it.

3. Two More Customer-Centric Objectives

The second and third most important objectives, improving the quality of the customer support experience, and creating frictionless cross channel experience. Whether you’re making a purchase, gathering information, or reaching out for customer support, quality and ease – as in low or no friction – are important. This is what customers want and expect. Anything less may have them looking elsewhere to do business with a company that is easier and more customer-focused.

4. KPIs Make the Case for Investing in CX

The C-Suite and leadership live and die by met KPIs. When it comes to CX, two tied as most important; CSAT (Customer Satisfaction) score and NPS (Net Promotor Score). Both of these numbers give you similar information. They let you know if your customers are happy (or not). A high score in either of these measurements is like a grade in school. Our leadership is grading us on our CX. Right behind these two are two more that are tied; ROI and Customer Lifetime Value (CLV). Both of these numbers are tied to profitability. We all want to put more money to our bottom line. One way to do so is to increase the CLV. Once we have a customer that loves us, nurture that relationship to keep them loyal. Loyal customers not only keep coming back, they typically spend more than other customers.

5. Focus on the Employee Experience and Not Just the Customer Experience

The executives were asked, “How important is a good employee experience when looking to achieve a world class customer experience?” A staggering 87% said it was important, with more than half of those saying it was extremely important. Brilliant! If you want to have a good customer experience, start with a good employee experience. There’s an old saying that it costs less to keep existing customers than to keep finding new ones. It’s the same with good employees. The cost of hiring and training to replace good people can be a big expense on a company. Give employees a reason to stay, which starts with the culture of the organization. They will work harder, engage better with customers and colleagues, and they will stay.

This article was originally published on Forbes.com.

Image Credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

Human-Centered Design in the Digital Age

Leave a reply

Navigating Challenges and Opportunities

Human-Centered Design in the Digital Age

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s digitally advanced era, businesses progressively rely on technology to connect with customers, optimize processes, and enhance products and services. However, amidst this rapid digitization, it is crucial to remember that humans should remain at the core of all design and development efforts. Human-centered design (HCD) principles guide us to create meaningful and intuitive solutions that truly address the needs and expectations of users. This article explores the challenges and opportunities of human-centered design in the digital age, emphasizing the importance of empathy and two compelling case studies that exemplify its effectiveness.

Challenges of Human-Centered Design in the Digital Age:

While human-centered design principles promise significant benefits, implementing them in the digital age comes with unique challenges. Some of these challenges include:

1. Big Data Overload: In the digital landscape, businesses are inundated with vast amounts of data about their users. It can be overwhelming to sift through this data effectively to truly understand user needs and preferences. Distilling relevant insights from the sea of information becomes crucial to designing user-centric solutions.

2. Rapid Technological Advances: The pace at which technology evolves poses challenges in keeping up with user expectations. Designers must not only adapt to the evolving technological landscape but also anticipate potential user challenges and preferences that emerge with new technologies.

Opportunities presented by Human-Centered Design in the Digital Age:

Human-centered design offers numerous opportunities for businesses to excel in the digital age. Some key opportunities include:

1. Enhancing User Experience (UX): User experience is the cornerstone of success in the digital realm. By understanding users intimately through human-centered design practices, businesses can craft seamless, intuitive, and immersive experiences that exceed user expectations. A well-designed UX fosters loyalty, advocacy, and differentiates a brand in an intensely competitive market.

2. Driving Digital Transformation: Human-centered design enables organizations to drive digital transformation effectively. By consistently placing humans at the center of strategic decision-making, businesses can create digital products and services that drive productive, efficient, and meaningful outcomes.

Case Study 1: Airbnb – Transforming Travel Experiences:

Airbnb’s success is deeply rooted in the implementation of human-centered design principles. By aligning their platform with the needs, desires, and pain points of both hosts and guests, Airbnb created a transformative experience in the travel industry. The platform offers personalized recommendations, user reviews, intuitive search features, and streamlined booking processes, centered around user needs. Airbnb’s human-centered approach revolutionized the travel industry and disrupted traditional accommodation providers.

Case Study 2: Apple – Revolutionizing Digital Communication:

Apple’s dominance in the smartphone market is a testament to its adherence to human-centered design principles. Through exquisite hardware and software integration, intuitive interfaces, and seamless connectivity, Apple prioritizes a superior user experience. By keenly understanding user emotions, wants, and needs, Apple revolutionized digital communication and became a symbol of exceptional human-centered design in the digital age.

Conclusion

In the digital age, human-centered design remains instrumental in overcoming challenges and capitalizing on opportunities. By genuinely understanding users, their struggles, and preferences, businesses can create innovative and meaningful digital solutions. As demonstrated by Airbnb and Apple, human-centered design has the power to transform industries and build strong connections with users. Embracing human-centered design in the digital age is not only an ethical decision but also a strategic choice that fosters long-term success and establishes an organization as a leader in its domain.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Mitigating risks and overcoming challenges during a digital transformation

Leave a reply

Mitigating risks and overcoming challenges during a digital transformation

GUEST POST from Chateau G Pato

As organizations continue to undergo digital transformations, they are faced with a myriad of risks and challenges that can potentially hinder the successful implementation of new technologies. From legacy systems that are resistant to change to cybersecurity threats that put sensitive data at risk, businesses must navigate through these obstacles to achieve their goals. In this thought leadership article, we will explore how organizations can mitigate risks and overcome challenges during a digital transformation by examining two case studies.

Case Study 1: Company A

Company A, a manufacturing firm with a history of using traditional paper-based processes, decided to digitize their operations to increase efficiency and streamline production. However, during the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, they encountered several challenges that threatened the success of their digital transformation.

One of the primary risks faced by Company A was the resistance from employees who were accustomed to their manual processes. To mitigate this risk, the organization implemented a comprehensive change management strategy that included training sessions, workshops, and continuous support for staff members. By engaging with employees and addressing their concerns, Company A was able to successfully transition to the new digital system with minimal disruptions.

Another challenge faced by Company A was the potential vulnerability to cyber threats as they moved sensitive data to a cloud-based ERP system. To address this risk, the organization invested in robust cybersecurity measures, including encryption, multi-factor authentication, and regular security audits. By prioritizing data security and implementing best practices, Company A was able to safeguard their information assets and mitigate the risk of breaches during their digital transformation.

Case Study 2: Company B

Company B, a retail organization looking to enhance their customer experience through digital channels, embarked on a digital transformation journey that included the implementation of an omnichannel marketing strategy. However, their efforts were hampered by the challenge of integrating disparate systems and data sources to create a seamless shopping experience for customers.

To overcome this challenge, Company B adopted an integration platform that allowed them to connect their CRM, e-commerce platform, inventory management system, and other applications in real-time. This streamlined data flow enabled the organization to gain a comprehensive view of their customers and deliver personalized marketing campaigns across all channels. By investing in a robust integration solution, Company B was able to overcome the challenge of siloed data and create a unified customer experience during their digital transformation.

Conclusion

Mitigating risks and overcoming challenges during a digital transformation requires proactive planning, stakeholder engagement, and investment in the right technologies. By learning from the experiences of companies like Company A and Company B, organizations can navigate through obstacles and achieve successful outcomes in their digital journey. Embracing change, prioritizing data security, and investing in integration solutions are crucial steps towards ensuring a smooth transition to a digital future.

Bottom line: Futurology is not fortune telling. Futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

Navigating the Challenges of Leading Change in a Remote Work Environment

Leave a reply

Navigating the Challenges of Leading Change in a Remote Work Environment

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

In today’s fast-paced and ever-evolving world, remote work has become more prevalent than ever before. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, organizations worldwide have been forced to embrace remote work as the primary mode of operations. However, leading change in a remote work environment can bring forth a unique set of challenges. In this article, we will explore these challenges and provide insights from two case studies to help leaders navigate this shift successfully.

Case Study 1: Company X – Introducing a New Project Management Software

Company X, a medium-sized marketing agency, decided to implement a new project management software to enhance collaboration and streamline workflows. However, they faced significant challenges in making this transition in a remote work environment.

Communication was a major hurdle for Company X, as employees were used to in-person interactions. To overcome this obstacle, the company implemented regular virtual meetings to keep everyone informed about the software’s functionalities and benefits. They also encouraged open communication channels and used several digital tools to facilitate real-time discussions.

Another challenge was ensuring that all employees were equipped with the necessary tools and skills to use the new software effectively. Company X provided comprehensive training sessions and created a repository of resources accessible to all employees. Additionally, they designated internal champions who could provide assistance and guidance to their colleagues during the transition.

By effectively addressing the communication gap and providing adequate support, Company X successfully led the change and now enjoys improved project management and collaboration in their remote work environment.

Case Study 2: Company Y – Restructuring Teams

Company Y, a global technology company, decided to restructure their teams to align with their evolving business goals. This shift required employees to switch teams, work with new colleagues, and adapt to different roles. Such changes can be particularly challenging in a remote work environment where employees have limited face-to-face interactions.

To navigate this transition successfully, Company Y organized virtual team-building activities to foster connections and build rapport among team members. They also encouraged social interactions through digital platforms and created informal spaces for employees to share ideas and experiences.

To ensure a smooth transition, Company Y provided extensive training and resources to equip employees with the necessary knowledge and skills required for their new roles. Regular feedback and performance evaluations were conducted, helping employees feel supported and valued throughout the change process.

Thanks to these initiatives, Company Y successfully led the restructuring process, creating stronger, more agile teams that thrive in the remote work environment.

Conclusion

Leading change in a remote work environment poses unique challenges that require a thoughtful and proactive approach. By addressing communication gaps, providing training and resources, and fostering a sense of community and support, organizations like Company X and Company Y have successfully navigated these challenges. As remote work continues to shape our professional landscape, embracing change and effectively leading teams through such transitions will be crucial for long-term success.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Benefits and Challenges of Futures Research

Leave a reply

The Benefits and Challenges of Futures Research

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

As the world continues to evolve at a rapid pace, it becomes increasingly vital for individuals, businesses, and governments to anticipate future trends and develop effective strategies to navigate the uncertainties that lie ahead. Futures research, also known as futurology or foresight, is an interdisciplinary field that aims to uncover potential futures and provide valuable insights for decision-making processes. This article explores the benefits and challenges of futures research and highlights two case study examples that demonstrate its practical applications.

Benefits of Futures Research:

1. Anticipating and Planning for Change: One of the primary benefits of futures research is its ability to help individuals and organizations anticipate and plan for change. By employing various analytical methods and tools, futures researchers can identify potential trends, disruptions, and emerging issues that may shape the future landscape. This gives decision-makers a valuable advantage in understanding the scope of potential challenges and opportunities, allowing them to proactively adapt their strategies and make informed decisions accordingly.

Case Study Example: Shell’s Scenarios Planning

Shell, one of the world’s largest oil and gas companies, has successfully utilized futures research techniques to adapt to changing energy landscapes. In the 1970s, amidst the oil crisis and mounting environmental concerns, Shell developed a set of scenarios to explore alternative futures in the energy sector. These scenarios provided a framework for decision-making and helped Shell anticipate the rise of renewable energy, leading to investments in solar, wind, and biofuels. This groundwork enabled Shell to diversify its portfolio and transition to a more sustainable energy company over time.

2. Inspiring Innovation and Resilience: Futures research fosters a culture of innovation by encouraging individuals and organizations to explore new possibilities and challenge conventional thinking. By examining potential futures, researchers can identify gaps, unmet needs, and disruptive trends, stimulating creative thinking and novel approaches. This, in turn, enables the development of innovative products, services, and strategies that can lead to a competitive advantage.

Case Study Example: Xerox’s PARC Research Center

Xerox established the Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) in the early 1970s to focus on exploring the future of computing and technology. PARC researchers anticipated various advancements in personal computing, including graphical user interfaces, ethernet networking, and laser printing. These foresight-inspired innovations laid the foundation for Xerox’s success in the technology market and significantly influenced the development of modern computing as we know it today.

Challenges of Futures Research:

1. Uncertainty and Complexity: Futures research is inherently confronted with uncertainty and complexity, making it challenging to accurately predict specific future outcomes. Multiple variables, unexpected events, and the interconnectedness of systems can often lead to inaccurate forecasts. The future is shaped by a multitude of factors, including political, social, economic, technological, and environmental influences, making it difficult to capture all possibilities comprehensively.

2. Perceived Lack of Relevance and Adoption: Another challenge of futures research lies in its perceived lack of relevance and adoption across various sectors. Many decision-makers tend to prioritize short-term goals and immediate challenges, overlooking the long-term view that futures research provides. Overcoming this challenge requires a shift in mindset that recognizes the value of investing time, resources, and attention in long-term foresight, as it offers unique insights and strategic advantages.

Conclusion:

Futures research holds immense value as a tool for planning, inspiring innovation, and enabling better decision-making by anticipating potential future trajectories. Through case study examples like Shell’s Scenarios Planning and Xerox’s PARC Research Center, we have seen how futures research can lead to successful adaptations to changing landscapes and the development of groundbreaking innovations. However, it is essential to acknowledge the challenges inherent in such endeavors, including the inherent uncertainty and the need for widespread adoption. By embracing futures research and embedding it into decision-making processes, individuals, organizations, and societies can proactively prepare for the unknowns and shape a more resilient and sustainable future.

Bottom line: Futurists are not fortune tellers. They use a formal approach to achieve their outcomes, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to be their own futurist.

Image credit: Pixabay

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.

The Benefits and Challenges of Using Futurology to Predict Future Trends

Leave a reply

The Benefits and Challenges of Using Futurology to Predict Future Trends

GUEST POST from Art Inteligencia

Futurology is the study of predicting future trends and advances in technology, economies and social structures. It is a field of research that has been gaining traction over the past few years, and many believe that it can help us better understand the future and make better decisions. While futurology can provide us with insight into what is to come, there are both benefits and challenges associated with using futurology to anticipate future trends.

Benefits

1. Improved Decision Making: By using futurology to anticipate future trends, businesses, governments and other organizations can make more informed decisions that are based on a greater understanding of the environment they will be operating in.

2. Greater Anticipation: Futurology allows us to better understand the future and anticipate potential changes before they occur. This can help us to prepare for these changes and be better prepared for whatever lies ahead.

3. Increased Efficiency: By understanding the future, organizations can more effectively plan and allocate resources. This can lead to increased efficiency and productivity.

4. More Accurate Forecasts: By using futurology, organizations can make more accurate predictions and forecasts. This can help them make better decisions and adjust their strategies accordingly.

5. Enhanced Planning: Futurology can help organizations develop better plans for the future. This can help them better anticipate and prepare for changes in their environment.

Challenges

1. Unpredictability: Futurology is not a perfect science and can be subject to errors and inaccuracies. This can lead to incorrect predictions and forecasts that can have a negative impact on decision making.

2. Limited Data: Data is often limited when it comes to predicting future trends. This can lead to inaccurate predictions and a lack of understanding of what is to come.

3. Technology Dependence: Futurology is heavily reliant on technology, and changes in technology can have an impact on predictions. Therefore, futurologists must be aware of this and be able to adapt to the changing environment.

4. Costly: The cost of researching and predicting future trends can be costly for organizations. This can lead to a reluctance to invest in futurology, which can limit its potential.

5. Time Intensive: Futurology can be very time intensive, as it requires extensive research and analysis. This can be difficult for organizations to manage, especially if they have limited resources.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while futurology can be a valuable tool for understanding and anticipating future trends, it is important to be aware of the benefits and challenges associated with using it. By understanding the potential benefits and challenges, organizations can better prepare for the future and make more informed decisions.

Bottom line: Futurology and future studies are not fortune telling. Skilled futurologists and futurists use a scientific approach to create their deliverables, but a methodology and tools like those in FutureHacking™ can empower anyone to engage in futurology themselves.

Image credit: Pexels

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to join 17,000+ leaders getting Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to their inbox every week.

The Challenge of Autonomous Teaching Methods

The Challenge of Autonomous Teaching Methods

An estimated 250 million children around the world cannot read, write, or demonstrate basic arithmetic skills. Many of these children are in developing countries without regular access to quality schools or teachers. While programs exist to build schools and train teachers, traditional models of education are not able to scale fast enough to meet demand. We simply cannot build enough schools or train enough teachers to meet the need. We are at a pivotal moment where an innovative approach is necessary to eliminate existing barriers to learning, enabling the seeds of innovation to be imparted to every child, regardless of geographic location or economic status.

XPRIZE Chairman and CEO, Dr. Peter H. Diamandis announced the $15M Global Learning XPRIZE today to help solve these challenges. The Global Learning XPRIZE is a five-year competition challenging teams to develop an open source solution that can be iterated upon, scaled and deployed around the world, bringing quality learning experiences to children no matter where they live. Enabling children in developing countries to teach themselves basic reading, writing and arithmetic.

At the same time, XPRIZE will launch an online crowdfunding campaign to mobilize a global street team of supporters to get involved with the Global Learning XPRIZE. Every dollar pledged will go towards optimizing the success of the prize, specifically focusing on supporting team recruitment globally and expanding field testing.

The Global Learning XPRIZE will launch with a six-month team registration period followed by 18 months of solution development. A panel of third-party expert judges will then evaluate and select the top five teams to proceed in the competition, and award each of them a $1M award. Solutions will be tested in the field with thousands of children in the developing world, over an 18-month period. The $10M top prize will ultimately be awarded to the team that develops a technology solution demonstrating the greatest levels of proficiency gains in reading, writing and arithmetic.

The learning solutions developed by this prize will enable a child to learn autonomously. And, those created by the finalists will be open-sourced for all to access, iterate and share. This technology could be deployed around the world, bringing learning experiences to children otherwise thought unreachable, who do not have access to quality education, and supplementing the learning experiences of children who do.

The impact will be exponential. Children with basic literacy skills have the potential to lift themselves out of poverty. And that’s not all. By enabling a child to learn how to learn, that child has opportunity – to live a healthy and productive life, to provide for their family and their community, as well as to contribute toward a peaceful, prosperous and abundant world.

XPRIZE believes that innovation can come from anywhere and that many of the greatest minds remain untapped.

What might the future look like with hundreds of millions of additional young minds unleashed to tackle the world’s Grand Challenges?

The Global Learning XPRIZE is funded by a group of donors, including the Dick & Betsy DeVos Foundation, the Anthony Robbins Foundation, the Econet Foundation, the Merkin Family Foundation, Scott Hassan, John Raymonds and Suzanne West.

For more information, visit http://learning.xprize.org.

COMMENTARY

I am very excited about this new effort, as I am a big believer that we should live in a world where the next Einstein could come from anywhere, but I have a few of concerns:

  • It seems to be focused on the use of technology
  • Five years is a long time (will they get a five-year-old solution?)
  • It doesn’t engage the target users in co-creation throughout the whole process (it’s outside in)
  • It seems to ignore the infrastructure in place in areas of the greatest need (where students don’t even have desks)
  • The most capable solutions may be too expensive to implement in the target areas
  • The goal should be to build an autonomous learning system that can be used for reading, writing, and arithmetic, but also extended to do much more
  • Teaching students skills autonomously is fine as long as there is social practice as part of the curriculum
  • An over-reliance on autonomous teaching will lead to less innovation not more
  • We are already seeing negative effects in first-world society from too much reliance on technology
  • If we want more innovation, we need to be teaching our kids ICE skills not just STEM, ICE being Invention, Collaboration, and Entrepreneurship – these are all social skills that don’t need technology (but can use it)

For more on my views on improving education (which doesn’t require education reform or new technology), please see my article Stop Praying for Education Reform.

For those of you who are going to enter a team, I look forward to seeing what you come up with and I hope that you’ll keep some of the above in mind!


Build a common language of innovation on your team

Subscribe to Human-Centered Change & Innovation WeeklySign up here to get Human-Centered Change & Innovation Weekly delivered to your inbox every week.